Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 33 views

    SBM Scoring Matrix Blank

    Uploaded by

    Gloria Iya S. Enriquez
    This document outlines a scoring matrix used to validate a school's School-Based Management practices. It involves a 3-step process: 1) Determine the school's performance improvement in access, efficiency, and quality indicators; 2) Compute validated SBM assessment scores based on principles of leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management; 3) Calculate a final rating based on weights for performance improvement and SBM assessment scores. The school received a final rating of 2.796, indicating their SBM level of practice is at the "Maturing" level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    SBM Scoring Matrix Blank

    Uploaded by

    Gloria Iya S. Enriquez
    33 views3 pages
    This document outlines a scoring matrix used to validate a school's School-Based Management practices. It involves a 3-step process: 1) Determine the school's performance improvement in access, efficiency, and quality indicators; 2) Compute validated SBM assessment scores based on principles of leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management; 3) Calculate a final rating based on weights for performance improvement and SBM assessment scores. The school received a final rating of 2.796, indicating their SBM level of practice is at the "Maturing" level.

    Original Description:

    Form

    Original Title

    Sbm Scoring Matrix Blank (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines a scoring matrix used to validate a school's School-Based Management practices. It involves a 3-step process: 1) Determine the school's performance improvement in access, efficiency, and quality indicators; 2) Compute validated SBM assessment scores based on principles of leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management; 3) Calculate a final rating based on weights for performance improvement and SBM assessment scores. The school received a final rating of 2.796, indicating their SBM level of practice is at the "Maturing" level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    33 views3 pages

    SBM Scoring Matrix Blank

    Uploaded by

    Gloria Iya S. Enriquez
    This document outlines a scoring matrix used to validate a school's School-Based Management practices. It involves a 3-step process: 1) Determine the school's performance improvement in access, efficiency, and quality indicators; 2) Compute validated SBM assessment scores based on principles of leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management; 3) Calculate a final rating based on weights for performance improvement and SBM assessment scores. The school received a final rating of 2.796, indicating their SBM level of practice is at the "Maturing" level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    SBM SCORING MATRIX VALIDATION FORM

    Name of School: ________________ Division: NUEVA ECIJA


    Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)

    Performance Rating & Equivalent


    Thematic Area Computation Results
    Indicators Points
    Access (45%) Enrolment
    % of increase
    Increase
    1 – Marginal: At least 5% increase
    SY 2016-2017

    2 – Average: At least 7% increase


    SY 2017-2018
    3 – High: At least 10% increase
    3 x 0.45 1.350

    SY 2018-2019

    Ave. % of
    Increase
    Efficiency Dropout Rate Baseline: 7.06
    % of Decrease
    (25%) (DR): 1 – Marginal: At most 2% decrease
    SY 2016-17 0.00%

    SY 2017-18 0.00% 2 – Average: At most 4% decrease

    SY 2018-19 0.00%

    Ave. % of 3 – High: Has 0 DR


    Increase
    Completion Rate
    % of increase Baseline: 75%
    (CR):

    SY 2016-17 91.75% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase

    SY 2017-18 96.95% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase 2.33 x 0.25 0.583

    SY 2018-19 99.45% 3 – High: At least 10% Increase

    Ave. % of
    Increase

    Cohort Survival Baseline 76%:


    Rate (CSR): % of Increase
    1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
    SY 2016-17 91.49% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase

    SY 2017-18 96.89% 3 – High: At least 10% Increase


    SY 2018-19 99.47%

    Average:
    Sub-total: (DR +
    (3 + 2 + 2)/3 = 2.33
    SR + CSR)

    NAT MPS % of Increase 1 - Marginal : 26 - 50%

    Quality 3 x 0.3 0.900


    (30%)
    2 - Average : 51 - 75%
    SY 2013-2014 85.82%
    3 - High : 76 - 100%

    SY 2014-2015 86.55%
    Quality 3 x 0.3 0.900
    (30%)
    SY 2015-2016 88.97%

    Average % of
    Increase

    Sub-total: 2.833

    Interpretation Good
    Better
    / Best
    Legend:
    Numerical
    Description
    Rating Scale
    0.50 – 1.49 Good
    1.50 – 2.49 Better
    2.50 – 3.00 Best
    Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of “Better” can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.

    Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

    Cumulative Scores of Validators


    SBM Principles Weight per Principle Results
    Computation
    Leadership 30% 2.80 x 0.30 0.84

    Curriculum & Learning 30% 2.86 x 0.30 0.86

    Accountability 25% 2.60 x 0.25 0.65

    Resource Management 15% 2.60 x 0.15 0.39

    Subtotal 100% 2.74

    Interpretation Good
    Better
    / Best
    Legend:
    Numerical
    Description
    Rating Scale
    0.50 – 1.49 Good
    1.50 – 2.49 Better
    2.50 – 3.00 Best

    Step 3: Compute for Final Rating


    Areas Weight Computation Results
    A.
    Performance 60% 2.833 1.700
    Improvement
    B. SBM
    Assessment 40% 2.740 1.096
    Score (DOD)
    TOTAL 100% 2.796
    Interpretation:
    Developing (Level I)
    Maturing (Level II)
    Advanced (Level III)

    Description of SBM Level of Practice:


    Numerical Rating Scale Description
    0.50 – 1.49 Developing
    1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
    2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

    ROWENA M. CASTILLO, Ph.D. NAME OF SCHOL HEAD


    Monitor Respondent

    EPS - I Private Schools / Division SBM Coordinator Head Teacher III


    Desgination / Office Desgination / Office

    __________________
    Date Date

    You might also like