Essay On Henry V: Explore The Complexity of The Character of Henry V
Essay On Henry V: Explore The Complexity of The Character of Henry V
Essay On Henry V: Explore The Complexity of The Character of Henry V
Question
Explore the complexity of the
character of Henry V.
Word count
1279+-
situation and many of his people have different views on him. His actions to the
common people are different than to his nobles and other men in his court,
displaying the lack of trust and love his commoners have for him, and the way
the king tries to gain his people’s trust. Henry V is easily enraged by the doings of
the people around him, however he manages to take that and use it for his own
At the beginning of the play in Act I Scene I (I.1), the Archbishop and the
Bishop are discussing the impacts a bill the king has passed will have on them. “It
must be thought on. If it pass against us / We lose the better half of our
possession.” (I.1, Page 6) The Archbishop fears this bill will strip the clergymen
of their highly valued lands and offered to the knights, earls and other post-
holders in the army. They decide to divert the King’s attention from this new law
make against your highness’ claim to France.” (I.2, Page 11) By saying this they
are condoning the King to wage war on France and forget about the laws he had
decided to apply in his own kingdom. This reaction clearly displays the extent to
which Henry V is naïve and easily manipulated by his own ‘loyal’ subjects.
“Then should the warlike Harry, like himself / Assume the port of Mars, and at
his heels / Leashed in like hounds, should famine, sword, and fire / crouch for
during times of battle. However these two sets of qualities – one being aggressive
and strategic and the other being over trusting and blind - raise a question as to
why such a skilled fighter can be so easily manipulated and fooled by his own
clergymen? Maybe its because King Henry in his court is a completely different
person than King Henry on the battlefield, allowing him to be baffled so easily.
Towards the end of Act I Scene 2, Henry V receives a gift from Lewis, the
Dauphin via the French Ambassadors. “He therefore sends you, meeter for your
spirit / This tun of treasure.” (I.2, Page, 18) As it turns out, the Dauphin has sent
the King of England a box full of tennis balls to mock him for claiming dukedoms
in France. The Prince’s rash actions vividly depict what he, the Dauphin thinks of
Henry V - nothing but a joke and a meaningless threat. “When we have matched
our rackets to these balls / We will in France, by God’s grace, play a set / Shall
strike his father’s crown into the hazard.” (I.2, Page 18) The King’s reply to the
ambassador’s message seems rather well thought and specifically worded, which
response (‘rackets’, ‘play a set’, ‘strike’ and ‘into the hazard’) just like the
Dauphin decided to do with the tennis balls. It almost seems like the King is
using the opportunity to send a threat in the form of a witty comeback for the
Dauphin’s ‘gift’.
However this quick show of wit contradicts the instance where the
Archbishop and the Bishop hoodwink the King; the difference between the two
instances being that the former was to his enemy and the latter to his subject.
This change in audience could mean that the King trusts his subjects blindly
without ever speculating any show of dishonesty and corruption, as he did in Act
I Scene 1, and that his subjects don’t respect him enough to not take advantage of
see the situation in his camps and ends up talking to some of his soldiers. “Ay, he
said so, to make us fight cheerfully: / but when our throats are cut he may be
ransomed, and / we ne’er the wiser.” (IV.1, Page 71) The two soldiers are
debating, with Henry V (under disguise), the dedication of the King towards his
soldiers and the high possibility of him deserting them in times of peril while
Henry V obviously has a different view. “Methinks I could not die anywhere so /
contented as in the King’s company, his cause being / just and his quarrel
honorable.” (IV.1, Page 69) He is trying to raise the respect and trust that runs
through his camps by going out and chatting with his men in order to better
understand their views and them. This is what a good king is supposed to do and
when Henry V does it, it just displays his growth as a king and as a person. It also
shows that his relationship with his men has been unstable from the start but as
the play progresses, Henry V attempts harder and harder to gain the trust of his
people.
Towards the end of Act IV in Scene 8, the number of casualties for both
sides is presented to the King to which he reacts like a good ruler. “Come, go we
boast of this, or take the praise from God / Which is His only.” (IV.8, Page 97)
This statement clearly shows how the King respects his fallen enemies and
warns his own men of the death penalty for boasting. This is a sign of a just king.
However the King is also heard giving credits to God for the win, which could
contradict his being respectful to the fallen French and in lieu, was praising the
doings of God himself; which could mean he was just a religious king.
After having won the battle against the French, King Henry V has a
meeting with the French King and his family, Henry V’s relatives. While
conversing with them Henry V demands Katherine to be left behind with him, so
that he may talk to her. “Yet leave our cousin Katherine here with us; she is our
capital demand.” (V.2, Page 105) He intends to take Katherine with him, as his
ultimate prize for the victory. He decides to talk to her, even though they cannot
speak the other’s language fluently but Henry V thinks language isn’t a barrier:
“If you will love me soundly / With your French heart, I will be glad to hear you
confess it brokenly with your English tongue.” (V.2, Page 105) Henry V
contradicts himself when he says the latter line of the dialogue where he states
he still needs to hear Katherine say the words while just prior to that he says its
okay if she loves him from her heart. As a king he always need yes for an answer
and cannot take anything else. Their relationship is a rather humorous one,
where each cannot fully understand the other and a translator is used to help the
two to converse. This suggests the weak bond in Henry V’s relationships or how
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Print.