Raj
Raj
Raj
JABALPUR
Versus
To,
The Hon’ble Presiding Officer
Hon’ble Debts Recovery Tribunal
Jabalpur, M P
record. Till that point of time also need for filing rejoinder was
no felt.
3. Vide order dated 11/04/2019, this Hon’ble Tribunal after
been noted in the order. Those issues are; (i) 8(6) notice not
8. Fact remains that no notice has been sent to Shri Neeraj Jain
not sent to Shri Neeraj Jain the same goes to the root of the
13. In the circumstances the fact that Rs. 50 Lakhs was deposited
said huge amount just a day before account could not have
16. Let the bank demonstrate from the said circular that devolved
facility.
21. In para 5 blank has taken a summersault of its stand and has
22. All these submissions / pleadings prove one and one thing
important fact that after the applicants had demanded for the
applicant’s representative.
24. Thus, it is false to allege that blank documents were not used
By:
JABALPUR
Versus
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL,
JABALPUR
Versus
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Signed and verified on this ___ day of May, 2019 at Bhopal
that the contents of the foregoing affidavit are true and correct to my
knowledge and belief. No part of this affidavit is false and nothing
material has been concealed thereof.
DEPONENT
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL,
JABALPUR
Versus
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
JABALPUR
Versus
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL,
JABALPUR
Securitisation Application No. 96/2018
Versus
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL,
JABALPUR
Versus
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL,
JABALPUR
Versus
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Signed and verified on this ___ day of May, 2019 at Bhopal
that the contents of the foregoing affidavit are true and correct to my
knowledge and belief. No part of this affidavit is false and nothing
material has been concealed thereof.
DEPONENT