Metabolic Disease in Pregnancy
Metabolic Disease in Pregnancy
Metabolic Disease in Pregnancy
1530/EC-18-0130
1
Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Italy;
2
Diabetes Centre, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of
*Corresponding author:
ABSTRACT
Hormonal changes during pregnancy can trigger gestational diabetes (GDM), which is
constantly increasing. Its main characteristic is pronounced insulin resistance, but it appears
to be a multifactorial process involving several metabolic factors; taken together, the latter
lead to silent or clinically evident cardiovascular (CV) events. Insulin resistance and central
adiposity are of crucial importance in the development of metabolic syndrome and they
inconsistent evidence as to whether or not co-existent GDM and HDP have a synergistic
more accepted since both these conditions may promote endothelial inflammation and early
atherosclerosis. Regardless of the presence or absence of the synergism between GDM and
HDP, these conditions need to be dealt early enough, in order to reduce CV morbidity and to
Introduction
and human placental lactogen) that are implicated in the development of gestational diabetes
cases (GDM) (1). Epidemiological evidence has consistently shown that among mothers with
prior history of GDM, 30-84% of them had GDM recurrence in subsequent pregnancies (2),
20-40% developed metabolic syndrome (MetS) within 2-20 years (3,4), and 17-63%
developed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity within 5-16 years (5-7). Longitudinal
studies have shown that women with prior GDM and obesity were at higher risk to develop
MetS compared with those without such metabolic history (8), and these women with prior
GDM and obesity had relatively higher values of anthropometric parameters (such as body
mass index [BMI] and waist circumference), blood pressure, glucose, homeostatic model
assessment [HOMA], insulin, C-peptide and fibrinogen, together with lower HDL-C levels
(9).
Insulin resistance and central adiposity are of crucial importance in the development
of MetS, and they appear to correlate with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, including
of GDM is mainly pronounced insulin resistance (1). However, other factors, such as race,
ethnicity, environmental and genetic factors (10), appear to contribute to the development of
Indeed, both these gestational complications share common risk factors such as maternal age,
parity and pre-pregnancy BMI. Arguably, they may also share underlying mechanisms
1
Page 4 of 12
However, it may be also true that HDP and GDM are the result of inherent
susceptibility to CVD. Mothers who were obese or had a personal history of chronic
hypertension or diabetes before pregnancy are more likely to develop HDP or GDM (19-21),
It has been reported that there is a significant link between pregnancy complications
(GDM and HDP) and CVD later in life (18,24), since HDP and GDM may promote
(25-30). HDP and GDM also negatively impact on inflammatory biomarkers, including
higher levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, adiponectin, C-reactive protein, leptin, and
important role beyond their role in diabetes, insulin resistance, visceral obesity, CVD and
hypertension (32,33). Moreover, GDM and HDP are linked with elevated low-density
lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and small dense LDL particles, which are implicated in CVD
(31,34).
Even though GDM and HDP may co-exist in pregnancies of the same mothers and are
associated with CV risk, some controversy remains as to whether or not co-existent GDM
and HDP have a synergistic effect to the risk of postpartum cardio-metabolic disease (13).
GDM or HDP is associated with a 15-fold higher risk in postpartum diabetes, with a 6-fold
greater risk of postpartum hypertension, and a 40% risk increase for CVD mortality in the
mothers (35). Meta-analyses have demonstrated that GDM is associated with a 7-fold higher
risk of type 2 diabetes in affected mothers, and HDP is associated with a double risk of
postpartum diabetes (5,26). It has also been shown that a prior GDM can enhance the risk of
2
Page 5 of 12
The study of Li et al. (37) interestingly shows that GMD and HDP contribute
independently and not synergistically to the postpartum cardiometabolic risk, and this was
somewhat unexpected, given the accumulating evidence (35-37) that suggest that these
conditions interplay in increasing the risk of diabetes, hypertension and CVD later in the
mothers’ lives as well as in their offspring (10,26,38). There are some potential limitations in
the study of Li et al. that need to be briefly discussed (37). First, the small cohort of subjects
and the relative brief follow-up period. In addition, GDM cases may be somewhat
misclassified because the diabetes diagnosis required fasting and/or the 2 hour glucose testing
after a 75 g oral glucose intake. Further, the data on GDM and HDP history were based on
self-reports only. Finally, as already highlighted by the authors, since some mothers with an
episode of GDM and/or HDP did not or were not able to conceive subsequently, these
It is well known in literature that women with GMD and HDP are more prone to MetS
(39-41) and they appear to transmit an increased risk to the offspring through vertical
transmission (8). Thus, it seems that women with GMD and HDP create an adverse metabolic
memory (42).
Conclusion
Women who have had GDM and/or HDP are now recognised to carry a high risk of
CVD and, regardless of the presence or absence of the synergism between GDM and HDP,
they need to be followed very carefully. Indeed, the American Heart Association
recommends long-term surveillance and management of CV risk factors in women with these
pregnancy-related complications (43,44). Of note, many women with GDM have later in life
an undiagnosed T2DM (45) and, therefore, increased awareness of GDM and HDP is needed.
3
Page 6 of 12
In addition, postpartum screening tools and biomarkers of subsequent risk are very helpful in
long-term follow-up.
Declaration of interest
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing
the impartiality of the research reported. This editorial was written independently. The
authors have given talks, attended conferences and participated in advisory boards and trials
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public,
References
3. Gunderson EP, Jacobs DR Jr, Chiang V, Lewis CE, Feng J, Quesenberry CP Jr, Sidney
study in CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults). Diabetes 2010
59 495-504.
4
Page 7 of 12
population of women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus is three-fold higher than
in the general population. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2005
90 4004-4010.
5. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after
gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009 373 1773-1779.
6. Hanna FW, Peters JR. Screening for gestational diabetes; past, present and future.
7. Lee AJ, Hiscock RJ, Wein P, Walker SP, Permezel M. Gestational diabetes mellitus:
8. Malcolm J. Through the looking glass: gestational diabetes as a predictor of maternal and
offspring long-term health. Diabetes Metabolism Research and Reviews 2012 28 307-
311.
10. Rizvi AA, Cuadra S, Nikolic D, Giglio RV, Montalto G, Rizzo M. Gestational diabetes
and the metabolic syndrome: can obesity and small, dense low density lipoproteins be
46.
5
Page 8 of 12
12. Xiong X, Saunders LD, Wang FL, Demianczuk NN. Gestational diabetes mellitus:
13. Ehrenthal DB, Maiden K, Rogers S, Ball A. Postpartum healthcare after gestational
14. Solomon CG, Seely EW. Brief review: hypertension in pregnancy: a manifestation of the
study. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2002 102
31-35.
TD. Gestational diabetes mellitus and long-term consequences for mother and offspring:
19. Romundstad PR, Magnussen EB, Smith GD, Vatten LJ. Hypertension in pregnancy and
20. Qiu C, Williams MA, Leisenring WM, Sorensen TK, Frederick IO, Dempsey JC, Luthy
DA. Family history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in relation to preeclampsia risk.
21. Geelhoed JJ, Fraser A, Tilling K, Benfield L, Davey Smith G, Sattar N, Nelson SM,
Lawlor DA. Preeclampsia and gestational hypertension are associated with childhood
6
Page 9 of 12
blood pressure independently of family adiposity measures: the Avon Longitudinal Study
22. D'Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, Kannel
WB. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart
23. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB.
Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998 97
1837-1847.
women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic
Disorders 2013 12 8.
25. Gunderson EP, Chiang V, Pletcher MJ, Jacobs DR, Quesenberry CP, Sidney S, Lewis
CE. History of gestational diabetes mellitus and future risk of atherosclerosis in mid-life:
the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study. Journal of the American
26. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of
cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis.
27. Rodie VA, Freeman DJ, Sattar N, Greer IA. Pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease:
28. Carpenter MW. Gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, and late vascular disease.
29. Yinon Y, Kingdom JC, Odutayo A, Moineddin R, Drewlo S, Lai V, Cherney DZ,
7
Page 10 of 12
intrauterine growth restriction: insights into future vascular risk. Circulation 2010 122
1846-1853.
30. Mrizak I, Arfa A, Fekih M, Debbabi H, Bouslema A, Boumaiza I, Zaouali M, Khan NA,
women with gestational diabetes mellitus: preliminary results. Lipids in Health and
31. Qiu C, Rudra C, Austin MA, Williams MA. Association of gestational diabetes mellitus
and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size. Physiological Research 2007 56 571-
578.
32. Ridker PM. Inflammatory biomarkers and risks of myocardial infarction, stroke,
diabetes, and total mortality: implications for longevity. Nutrition Reviews 2007 65 253-
259.
33. Rizvi AA. Hypertension, obesity, and inflammation: the complex designs of a deadly
684.
8
Page 11 of 12
37. Li LJ, Aris IM, Su LL, Chong YS, Wong TY, Tan KH, Wang JJ. Effect of gestational
38. Nolan CJ, Damm P, Prentki M. Type 2 diabetes across generations: from
39. Sim JH, Chung D, Lim JS, Lee MY, Chung CH, Shin JY, Huh JH. Maternal age at first
from 2008-2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One
2015 10 e0127860.
40. Sullivan SD, Umans JG, Ratner R. Gestational diabetes: implications for cardiovascular
41. Rizzo M, Berneis K, Altinova AE, Toruner FB, Akturk M, Ayvaz G, Rini GB, Spinas
GA, Arslan M. Atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype and LDL size and subclasses in
43. Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L,
Greenlund K, Daniels S, Nichol G, Tomaselli GF, Arnett DK, et al.; American Heart
Association Strategic Planning Task Force and Statistics Committee. Defining and
setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the
American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond.
44. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bezanson JL, Dolor RJ, Lloyd-Jones DM, Newby LK,
Piña IL, Roger VL, Shaw LJ, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of
9
Page 12 of 12
45. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel,
Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR,
Leiva Ad, Hod M, Kitzmiler JL, et al. International association of diabetes and
10