THE OF H. M.D.,: William L. Dornette
THE OF H. M.D.,: William L. Dornette
THE OF H. M.D.,: William L. Dornette
THEORIES OF ACUPUNCTURE
Closely related to the anatomy of acupuncture are the modalities
by which the effect is produced. According to traditional Chinese
concepts, acupuncture works by a balancing of the Yin and the Yang,
with a consequent restoration to normal of the energy flows and bal-
ance within the body.1 2 No Western scientist and few modern Ori-
entals still espouse this belief. A second theory relates to conditioning;
evidence emanating from China suggests that candidates for acupunc-
ture analgesia are conditioned for the procedure.3 This explanation is
closely akin to the hypnotic theory.4 Advocates of this thesis believe
that since the phenomenon of the acupuncture effect can be produced
by deep hypnosis, acupuncture is really a form of hypnosis. Neither
conditioning nor hypnosis explain all the effects of acupuncture, how-
ever. Nor do they explain the failure to produce these effects if the
acupuncture loci are first numbed with a regional anesthetic and the
success of acupuncture in young children and animals. Another pro-
posal relates to a postulated "third vascular system." It is suggested
that a heretofore undiscovered or undescribed vascular system exists
in the body, and that stimulation of acupuncture loci induces changes
in this system.
Other investigators suggest the possibility that the reticular forma-
tion is involved in the acupuncture effect. Considering the numerous
ramifications and interconnections of the reticular formation through-
out the entire nervous system, one certainly can conclude that the
reticular formation may well play a role in acupuncture. Evidence
suggests that it is involved in the production of both anesthesia' and
hypnosis.6 Nevertheless, although the reticular formation may be in-
volved in acupuncture, it is probably not the principal structure im-
plicated. This formation is distributed throughout the central nervous
system, but it has not been identified as extending into the peripheral
nervous system. Thus, it cannot be suggested that it is involved in the
transmission of impulses over the spinal nerves for the receipt of acu-
puncture impulses or the production of the acupuncture effect.
Finally, we come to the gate theory of XVall and Melzack.7 First
propounded in I965, this theory makes a great deal of sense in light
of a number of factors. Unquestionably, acupuncture is of neural ori-
gin. Many of the meridians follow peripheral nerves. M~any of the
acupuncture points overlie concentration of somatic receptors, both
Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med.
THE ANATOMY OF ACUPUNCTURE 8 97
Nerve fiber
Location Type Modality innervation
| inhibition
-_- excitation
nerve. The sensory nucleus of this nerve is large and extends from a
point high in the pons caudally to the cervical region of the spinal cord,
where it is contiguous with the substantia gelatinosa of the dorsal horn
of the cord at about the level of the second cervical vertebra. Thus,
one can postulate a connection between fibers of this nucleus and the
first gate of the Wall-Melzack theory.
A detailed discussion of the anatomy of the neuronal connections
of auriculotherapy is beyond the scope of this paper. It is germane,
however, to mention the principal nerves involved. Arnold's nerve, a
branch of the tenth cranial (vagus) nerve, supplies the skin of the
external auditory canal and immediately adjacent portions of the pinna.
The cell bodies of the sensory fibers of Arnold's nerve are located in
the jugular ganglion. From there the nerve fibers pass to the brain stem
and enter the nucleus of the tractus solatarius in the medulla. From this
nucleus ascending sensory impulses traverse the medial lemniscus to
synapses in the posterolateral ventral nucleus of the thalamus, the loca-
tion of Melzack's second gate.
CONCLUSION
The involvement in acupuncture of the anatomic structures described
herein is based on the validity of the XWall-M\lelzac theory or on some
similar theory. Detecting and tracing neuronal activity in vivo is dif-
ficult. Therefore, it would be difficult to prove or disprove this theory
and state with certainty the exact anatomic pathways that carry the
acupuncture messages. The evidence seems irrefutable that some com-
ponents of the nervous system do produce the acupuncture effect and
available evidence strongly supports the role suggested for the various
structures mentioned in this paper. It is to be hoped that current resear-
ches directed toward the neurophysiology of acupuncture wvii provide
better understanding. The researchers may even prove Melzack's thesis,
or postulate a better one. Acupuncture deserves better understanding
among the scientific community. Perhaps studies now underwvay wvill
help to develop that understanding.
ACKNOWLEDGMIENT
The author acknowledges with appreciation the invaluable help
given by Marta C. Steinberg, M.D., neuropathologist of the Cleveland
Clinic, in the preparation of this paper.
Vol. 51, No. 8, September 1975
902 W. H. L. DORNETTE
REFERENCES
1. McGarey, W. A.: A cupuncture and Body 69:519-29, 1953.
Energies. Phoenix, Gabriel, 1974, pp. 6 6. West, L. J.: Psychophysiology of hyp-
et seq. nosis. J.A.M.A. 172:672-75, 1960.
2. Perlow, B. W.: Acupuncture: Its theory 7. Melzack, R. and Wall, P. D.: Pain
and use in general practice. Proc. Roy. mechanisms: A new theory. Science 150:
Soc. Med. 66:426-28, 1973. 971-79, 1965.
3. Chaves, J. F. and Barber, T. X.: Un- 8. Travell, J. and Rinzler, S. H.: The my-
published data. ofascial genesis of pain. Postgrad. Med.
4. Kroger, W. S.: Acupuncture analgesia: J. 11:425-34, 1952.
Its explanation by conditioning theory, 9. Melzack, R.: The Puzzle of Pain. New
autogenic training and hypnosis. Amer. York, Basic Books, 1973, pp. 153-72.
J. Psychiat. 130:855-60, 1973. 10. Man, P. L. and Chen, G. H.: Acupunc-
5. French, J. D., Verzeano, M., and ture "anesthesia"-A new theory and
Magoun, H. W.: A neural basis for the clinical study. Curr. Ther. Res. 14:390-
anesthetic state. Arch. Neurol. Psychol., 94, 1972