06 Density and Voids of Aggregates
06 Density and Voids of Aggregates
06 Density and Voids of Aggregates
This test method covers the determination of bulk density (“unit weight”) of aggregate in
a compacted or loose condition, and calculated voids between particles in fine, coarse, or
mixed aggregates based on the same determination. This test method is applicable to
aggregates not exceeding 125 mm (5 in.) in nominal maximum size.
For the selection of procedure, shoveling for loose bulk density shall be used only when
specifically stipulated. Otherwise, the compact bulk density shall be determined by the
rodding procedure for aggregates having a nominal maximum size of 37.5mm (1½” in) or
less, or by the jigging procedure for aggregates having a nominal maximum size greater
than 37.5mm (1½” in) and not exceeding 125mm (5in).
Bulk density of aggregate, the mass of a unit volume of bulk aggregate material, in which
the volume includes the volume of the individual particles and the volume of the voids
between the particles.
Voids, n—in unit volume of aggregate, the space between particles in an aggregate mass
not occupied by solid mineral matter.
LAB-ACAD-CE-007/08AUG2018/REV.0
Page 1 of 6
where:
Balance
Measure
Tamping Rod
Container
Scoop / Shovel
Gloves
Labelling Devices
6.6. Procedure
6.7. Calibration of Measure
1. Fill the measure with water at room temperature and cover with a piece of plate
glass in such a way as to eliminate bubbles and excess water.
2. Determine the mass of water in the measure using the balance.
3. Measure the temperature of water to determine its density from the table below,
interpolating if necessary.
Density of Water
Temperature
kg/m3 lb/ft3
C F
15.6 60.0 999.01 62.366
18.3 65.0 998.54 62.336
21.1 70.0 997.97 62.301
23.0 73.4 997.54 62.274
23.9 75.0 997.32 62.261
26.7 80.0 996.59 62.216
29.4 85.0 995.83 62.166
LAB-ACAD-CE-007/08AUG2018/REV.0
Page 2 of 6
4. Calculate the volume, V, of the measure by dividing the mass of water required to
fill the measure by its density.
DATA:
LAB-ACAD-CE-007/08AUG2018/REV.0
Page 3 of 6
RESULTS:
6.11. Calculation
Rodding Rodding
Shoveling Shoveling
Rodding Rodding
Shoveling Shoveling
LAB-ACAD-CE-007/08AUG2018/REV.0
Page 6 of 6
6.12. Observation
The group observed that tampering fine aggregates does not do much since the act would
only bore temporary holes into the mass of aggregates which would be filled up when the rod is pulled
out, while tampering coarse aggregates will actually compress the aggregates and can also break some of
it.
6.13. Conclusion/s
The group concludes that the coarse aggregates should have bigger void percentage when it
comes to both tampering and shoveling compared to fine aggregates since coarse aggregates are bigger
and have a variety in shapes and slight differences in sizes, while fine aggregates look and feel uniform.
This conclusion is reinforced by the experiment's results with the coarse aggregates' void percentage
being approximately 2 percent higher than the fine aggregates' when it came to rodding, and
approximately 4 percent higher in shoveling.
LAB-ACAD-CE-007/08AUG2018/REV.0
Page 6 of 6
6.14. Documentation
The group weighed the container that Group members filled the bucket 1/3
will be used in the experiment. of its height then thumped it 25 times,
then continued to fill it 2/3 and
the same amount of thump.
For shoveling, they continuously The same steps were done with
poured coarse aggregates until the fine aggregates, after gathering
bucket was filled. the data, the group computed.
6.15. References
ASTM C29/C29M. (2003). Bulk Density (Unit Weight) and Voids in Aggregate.
West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
LAB-ACAD-CE-007/08AUG2018/REV.0
Page 6 of 6
Kourd, A., & Hammad, A. (2010). Building Materials Laboratory Manual. Retrieved July 11,
2016, from http://site.iugaza.edu
LAB-ACAD-CE-007/08AUG2018/REV.0
Page 6 of 6