SpecialRelativity PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 22

SPECIAL RELATIVITY

(Einstein 1905)

Motivations:

Explaining the results of the Michelson-Morley


experiment without invoking a “force” exerted
on bodies moving through the aether.

Make the equations that describe electromagnetism (called


Maxwell’s equations) simple and symmetrical in all reference
frames, independent of whether the frames are moving or not.

[Note: some material in these notes is courtesy of D. Watson and M. Begelman]


SPECIAL RELATIVITY
(Einstein 1905)
Based on two postulates:

The RELATIVITY PRINCIPLE:


the laws of physics are the same in
all inertial frames.

The CONSTANCY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT: the speed


of light, c=299,792 km/s, is the same for all inertial observers,
independent of their velocity of motion relative to the
source of light.

SPECIAL = only applies to inertial reference frames, those for which


the state of motion is not influenced by external forces
From the two principles of special relativity, some important
consequences are derived.

Relativity of Simultaneity

To inside observer, To outside observer, downward beam hits first


light beams hit top (car catches up) - upward beam hits next
and bottom (chases car).
simultaneously
Time Dilation
A light pulse goes from the floor
to the ceiling and back. Since
c=const but the distance is longer
in case B (moving frame):
Time intervals seen in [Image from http://www.mncs.k12.mn.us/physics/relativity]
moving reference frames
appear longer than the same
interval seen at rest.

[drawing by M. Fowler]
A B
Chuck

Beverly

The clock is at rest with respect to the reference frame 2


Dt1 = gDt 2 where g =
1-
1
V2
(Lorentz
factor)
c2

Chuck

Beverly

Dt1 > Dt 2 The clock is at rest in Frame 2 (Chuck’s frame)


Some numerical examples of time dilation
Lorentz contraction

Objects seen in moving reference [Image from http://www.mncs.k12.mn.us/physics/relativity]


frames appear shorter along the
direction of motion than the same
object seen at rest.

[I will not derive the mathematical expression for time dilation and Lorentz
contraction in class, but I have made handwritten notes with the detailed
derivations for whoever would like to see them. The derivations will not be
on any question or exam (but just for your own pleasure )]
Chuck

Beverly
1
Dx1 = Dx 2 / g where g =
V2
(Lorentz
1- 2 factor)
c
Dy1 = Dy 2
Chuck †


Beverly

x: direction of motion -- y: direction perpendicular to motion


Some numerical examples of length contraction
Special-relativistic velocity addition (in the direction of motion)
and NOT v1=v2+V
as in classical mechanics.
Note: v1 never exceeds c.

Chuck

Beverly

Note: velocities can be positive (towards east in this example) or negative (towards west)
Special-relativistic velocity addition: an example

Chuck

Beverly
Special-relativistic velocity addition: an example (continued)
Mass is relative
An object seen in a moving
reference frame appears to
be more massive than the
same object seen at rest.
The relation between the two masses is given by
m = gm0 where m 0 is the mass measured at rest.
Two consequences:

When trying to bring an object to a velocity v c, its mass



m appears infinite and therefore you would need an infinite
amount of†energy nothing can move faster than light!

E=Mc2 Mass and energy are equivalent


SOME EXPERIMENTAL TESTS OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY

High-energy particle
accelerators: radioactive
particles are seen to
live much longer when
moving at speed close
than that of light than
when at rest (direct
probe of time dilation).
No matter how much
they are accelerated,
they can never reach the
speed of light.

High-energy particle accelerator at Fermi Lab


Nuclear reactors/bombs:
(near Chicago) mass is converted in
energy (E=mc2)
SUMMARY OF THE PREDICTIONS OF THE THEORY OF
SPECIAL RELATIVITY
Relativity of Simultaneity

Time dilation Dt = gDt 0 [subscript “0” refers to the frame in which clock and
meter are at rest]

Length contraction along the direction of motion L = L0 / g

Space and Time are relative



†light, and add up in such a
Velocities are relative, except for that of
way that they never exceed the velocity of light.
There is no reference frame in which light can appear to
be at rest.

Mass is relative and mass and energy are equivalent.


Warping (or “mixing” of Spacetime)
Space in one reference frame is a “mixture” of space and time
from another reference frame.
Similarly, time in one reference frame is a “mixture” of space and
time from another reference frame.
The “mixture” is called SPACETIME
The Minkowski (absolute) interval is the same in all frames:

(distance in Frame 1) 2
Absolute interval =
- c 2 ( time interval in Frame 1) 2
(distance in Frame 2) 2
=
- c 2 ( time interval in Frame 2) 2
Geometric analogy for the absolute interval:
the example of the Mledinans (Thorne pp. 88-90)
Absolute distance (on a
map) covered is the
same for men and
women, even though
they take different
paths and have different
coordinate systems.

The direction the men


call North is a mixture of
the women’s north and
east. The direction the
women call North is part
Figure from Thorne, north, part west,
Black holes and time warps
according to the men.
North and east can be seen as the equivalent of space and time, and the absolute
distance as the equivalent of the absolute (Minkowski) spacetime interval.
Aberration: an example from “everyday” life -
Looking out of the window of….
…a train at rest …. a train moving at 30 km/hr

…a train moving at 60 km/hr …. a train moving at 250 km/hr

[Images from http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/aberration.html]


Relativistic aberration of Light : when the velocity of
the elevator is close to that of light

Direction of light beam is relative:


the angle that the beam makes
with the wall of the elevator
depends on the velocity of the
elevator.
Traveling at relativistic velocities: movie clips by Daniel Weiskopf - Copyright 1997-2001

You might also like