1 Introduction - General Mathematics Not
1 Introduction - General Mathematics Not
1 Introduction - General Mathematics Not
232-243
c
ISSN 2219-7184; Copyright °ICSRS Publication, 2010
www.i-csrs.org
Available free online at http://www.geman.in
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to introduce a new type of sets in bitopolog-
ical spaces which is conditional ξ-open set in bitopological spaces called
(i, j)-ξ-open set and we study its basic properties, and also we introduce
some characterizations of this set.
1 Introduction
interior and closure of A with respect to the topology τi on X and i-IntY (A),
i-ClY (A) denote respectively the interior and the closure of A with respect to
the induced toplogy on Y.
2 Preliminaries
Theorem 2.4 [9] A space X is semi-T1 if and only if for any point x ∈ X
the singleton set {x} is semi-closed.
Theorem 2.5 [10] For any space (X, τ ) and (Y, τ ) if A ⊆ X, B ⊆ Y then:
Theorem 2.6 [10] For any topological space the following statements are
true:
3 Basic Properties
In this section, we introduce and define a new type of sets in bitopological
spaces and find some of its properties
It is clear from the definition that every (i, j)-ξ-open set is j-open, but the
converse is not true in general as shown in the following example.
(i, j)-ξ-Open sets in bitopological spaces 235
Example 3.3 Let X = {a, b, c} , τ1 = {φ, {a}, X}, τ2 = {φ, {c}, {a, b}, X},
then (i, j)-ξO(X)= {φ, {c}, X}.It is clear that {a, b} is j−open but not (i, j)-
ξ-open.
Proof. Let V ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X), then V ∈ τj (X) and for each x ∈ V , there exist
i-semi-closed F in X such that x ∈ F ⊆ V , by Remark 2.3, F is i-open, it
follows that V ∈ τi , and hence (i, j)-ξO(X) ⊆ τi .
The converse of Theorem 3.7, is not true in general, as shown in the fol-
lowing example:
Example 3.8 Let X = {a, b, c}, τ1 = {φ, {a}, {b, c}, X} and τ2 ={φ, {b, c},X},
then (i, j)-ξO(X) = {φ, {b, c}, X} and it is clear that (X, τ1 ) is locally indis-
crete but τ1 is not a subset of (i, j)-ξO(X)
Proof. Let (x1 , x2 ) ∈ A1 ×A2 then x1 ∈ A1 and x2 ∈ A2 , and since A1 ∈ (i, j)-
ξO(X1 ) and A2 ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X2 ), then A1 ∈ j-ξO(X1 ) and A2 ∈ j-ξO(X2 ),
there exist F1 ∈ i-SC(X1 ) and F2 ∈ i-SC(X2 ) such that x1 ∈ F1 ⊆ A1 and
x2 ∈ F2 ⊆ A2 . Therefore (x1 , x2 ) ∈ F1 ×F2 ⊆ A1 ×A2 , and since A1 ∈ j-ξO(X1 )
and A2 ∈ j-ξO(X2 ), then by Theorem 2.5 part(1) A1 × A2 = j-ξIntx1 (A1 ) × j-
ξIntx2 (A2 ) = j-ξIntx1 ×x2 (A1 × A2 ), hence A1 × A2 ∈ j-ξO(X1 × X2 ) and
since F1 ∈ i-SC(X1 ) and F2 ∈ i-SC(X2 ) then by Theorem 2.5 part (2) we get
F1 × F2 = i-sClx1 (F1 ) × i-sClx2 (F2 ) = i-sClx1 ×x2 (F1 × F2 ), hence F1 × F2 ∈ i-
SC(X1 × X2 ), therefore A1 × A2 ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X).
Theorem 3.10 For any bitopological space (X, τ1 , τ2 ), if A ∈ τj (X) and
either A ∈ i-ηO(X) or A ∈ i-SθO(X), then A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X)
Proof. Let A ∈ i-ηO(X) and A ∈ τj (X), if A = φ , then A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X), if
A 6= φ, since A ∈ i-ηO(X) , then A = ∪Fα , where Fα ∈ i-δC(X) for each α,
and since i-δC(X) ⊆ i-SC(X), so Fα ∈ i-SC(X) for each α, and A ∈ τj (X)
so by Corollary 3.2 A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X).
On the other hand, suppose that A ∈ i-SθO(X) and A ∈ τj (X), if A = φ, then
A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X), if A 6= φ, since A ∈ i-SθO(X), then for each x ∈ A, there
exist i-semi-open set U such that x ∈ U ⊆ i-sCl(U ) ⊆ A, this implies that
x ∈ i-sCl(U ) ⊆ A and A ∈ τj (X), therefore by Corollary 3.2 A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X).
Theorem 3.11 Let Y be a subspace of a bitopological space (X, τ1 , τ2 ), if
A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X) and A ⊆ Y , then A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(Y )
Proof. Let A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X), then A ∈ τj (X) and for each x ∈ A, there exists
i-semi-closed set F in X such that x ∈ F ⊆ A, since A ∈ τj (X) and A ⊆ Y ,
then by Theorem 2.6 A ∈ τj (Y ), and since F ∈ i-SC(X) and F ⊆ Y , then by
Theorem 2.6 F ∈ i-SC(Y ), hence A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(Y ).
From the above theorem we obtain:
Corollary 3.12 Let X be a bitopological space , A and Y be two subsets of
X such that A ⊆ Y ⊆ X, Y ∈ RO(X, τj ), Y ∈ RO(X, τi ), then A ∈ (i, j)-
ξO(Y ) if and only if A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X)
Proposition 3.13 Let Y be a subspace of a bitopological space (X, τ1 , τ2 ),
if A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(Y ) and Y ∈ i-SC(X), then for each x ∈ A, there exists an
i-semi-closed set F in X such that x ∈ F ⊆ A.
Proof. Let A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(Y ), then A ∈ τj (Y ) and for each x ∈ A there exist
an i-semi-closed set F in Y such that x ∈ F ⊆ A, and since Y ∈ i-SC(X) so
by Theorem 2.6 F ∈ i-SC(X), which completes the proof.
Proposition 3.14 Let A and Y be any subsets of a bitopological space X, if
A ∈ (i, j)-ξO(X) and Y ∈ RO(X, τj ) and Y ∈ RO(X, τi ) then A ∩ Y ∈ (i, j)-
ξO(X)
(i, j)-ξ-Open sets in bitopological spaces 237
Proof. Suppose that x ∈ (i, j)-ξ-Int(A), then there exists an (i, j)-ξ-open
set U of X containing x such that x ∈ U ⊆ A. Since U is an (i, j)-ξ-open
set, so there exists an i-semi-closed set F such that x ∈ F ⊆ U ⊆ A. Hence,
x ∈ F ⊆ A.
Some properties of (i, j)-ξ-interior operators on a set are given in the fol-
lowing:
Theorem 4.6 For any subsets A and B of a bitopological space X, the
following statements are true:
1. The (i, j)-ξ-interior of A is the union of all (i, j)-ξ-open sets contained
in A.
(i, j)-ξ-Open sets in bitopological spaces 239
5. (i, j)-ξ-Int(φ) = φ.
6. (i, j)-ξ-Int(X) = X
7. (i, j)-ξ-Int(A) ⊆ A.
Proof. Straightforward.
In general (i, j)-ξInt(A) ∪(i, j)-ξInt(B) 6= (i, j)-ξInt(A ∪ B) as it shown
in the following example:
Example 4.7 Let X = {a, b, c}, τ1 = {φ, {a}, {a, c}, X} and τ2 = {φ, {b, c}, X},
then (i, j)-ξO(X) = {φ, {b, c}, X} if we take A = {a, b} and B = {b, c}, then
(i, j)-ξInt(A) = φ, and (i, j)-ξInt(B) = {b, c}, and (i, j)-ξInt(A) ∪ (i, j)-
ξInt(B) = {b, c}, (i, j)-ξInt(A ∪ B) = (i, j)-ξInt(X) = X.
Example 4.8 Let X = {a, b, c}, τ1 = {φ, {a}, {a, c}, X} and τ2 = {φ, {a}, {b, c}, X},
then (i, j)-ξO(X) = {φ, {b, c}, X}, if we take A = {a},then (i, j)-ξInt(A) = φ,
but j-Int(A) = A. Hence (i, j)-ξInt(A) 6= j-Int(A).
1. The (i, j)-ξ-closure of A is the intersection of all (i, j)-ξ-closed sets con-
taining A.
5. (i, j)-ξ-cl(φ) = φ.
6. (i, j)-ξ-cl(X) = X
7. A ⊆ (i, j)-ξ-cl(A).
Corollary 4.13 For any subset A of a bitopological space X, then the fol-
lowing statements are true:
It is clear that j-Cl(F ) ⊆ (i, j)-ξCl(F ), the converse may be false as shown in
the following example:
In general It is clear that(i, j)-ξD(A) ⊆ j-D(A), but the converse may not
be true as shown in the following example:
Proof. Obvious .
Proof. Obvious .
242 Alias B. Khalaf et al.
References
[1] D. E. Cameron, Properties of S-closed spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,
72(3)(1978), 581-586.
[2] G. Di Maio and T. Noiri, On s-closed spaces, Indian J. pure Appl. Math.,
18(3)(1987), 226-233.
[13] S. Popvassilev and D. Stavrova, On the η-expansion topology for the co-
semi-regularization and middly Hausdorff spaces, Acta Math. Hangar.,
80(1-2)(1998), 9-19.