Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 41 views

    Guava Lab Data

    Uploaded by

    Shovon
    The document contains 9 data tables presenting results of an experiment evaluating different treatments for reducing fruit decay during storage. The treatments included a control with no treatment, hot water dipping plus low density polyethylene packaging, and the same plus 1% micro-perforations. Across 12 days of storage, the treatments showed differences in parameters like weight loss, color changes, nutrient content, odor and texture of samples, as well as measures of disease severity and incidence. The best performance was seen for the treatment combining hot water dipping, polyethylene packaging and micro-perforations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Guava Lab Data

    Uploaded by

    Shovon
    41 views8 pages
    The document contains 9 data tables presenting results of an experiment evaluating different treatments for reducing fruit decay during storage. The treatments included a control with no treatment, hot water dipping plus low density polyethylene packaging, and the same plus 1% micro-perforations. Across 12 days of storage, the treatments showed differences in parameters like weight loss, color changes, nutrient content, odor and texture of samples, as well as measures of disease severity and incidence. The best performance was seen for the treatment combining hot water dipping, polyethylene packaging and micro-perforations.

    Original Title

    guava lab data.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains 9 data tables presenting results of an experiment evaluating different treatments for reducing fruit decay during storage. The treatments included a control with no treatment, hot water dipping plus low density polyethylene packaging, and the same plus 1% micro-perforations. Across 12 days of storage, the treatments showed differences in parameters like weight loss, color changes, nutrient content, odor and texture of samples, as well as measures of disease severity and incidence. The best performance was seen for the treatment combining hot water dipping, polyethylene packaging and micro-perforations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    41 views8 pages

    Guava Lab Data

    Uploaded by

    Shovon
    The document contains 9 data tables presenting results of an experiment evaluating different treatments for reducing fruit decay during storage. The treatments included a control with no treatment, hot water dipping plus low density polyethylene packaging, and the same plus 1% micro-perforations. Across 12 days of storage, the treatments showed differences in parameters like weight loss, color changes, nutrient content, odor and texture of samples, as well as measures of disease severity and incidence. The best performance was seen for the treatment combining hot water dipping, polyethylene packaging and micro-perforations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 8

    Data table 01: Fruit weight loss percentage

    Sample weight at different days


    Treatment Sample
    No.
    00 03 06 09 12
    A 380 347 319 305 298

    Control B 275 245 220 201 195

    C 334 275 237 207 202

    D 352 314 270 235 223

    A 280 256 254 239 233


    Hot water
    + B 369 339 338 335 333
    LDPE
    C 240 224 221 218 215

    D 360 351 330 323 318

    Hot water A 275 263 258 252 249


    +
    LDPE+ B 397 380 373 370 362
    1%
    PERFORA- C 269 263 260 255 252
    TION
    D 355 346 243 338 336
    Data table 02: skin color
    Scale: 1=completely green, 2=slightly green, 3=50% green color and 50 % yellow color 4=more
    yellow than green , 5= yellow

    Skin color at different days

    Treatment Sample

    No.
    00 03 06 09 12
    A 1 1 2 2 2

    B 1 1 2 2 2

    control C 1 1 1 2 2

    D 1 1 2 2 2

    A 1 1 1 2 2

    Hot water B 1 1 2 2 3
    + C 1 2 2 2 2

    LDPE D 1 1 2 2 2

    Hot water A 1 1 2 2 3
    + B 1 2 2 2 3
    LDPE+ C 1 2 2 2 3
    1% D 1 2 2 2 3
    PERFORA-

    TION
    Data table 03: soluble solid content

    Soluble solid at different days

    Treatment 00 03 06 09 12

    Sample-1 Sample-2 Sample-3 Sample-4 Sample-5

    control 8.2 7.0 6.8 6.3 6.1

    Hot water +
    LDPE 8.2 7.1 6.9 6.6 6.5

    Hot water +
    LDPE + 1% 8.2 8.0 7.0 6.9 6.7
    perforation

    Data table 04: pH

    PH at different days

    Treatment 00 03 06 09 12

    Sample-1 Sample-2 Sample-3 Sample-4 Sample-5

    control 4.71 4.85 4.87 4.95 4.98

    Hot water +
    LDPE 4.71 4.75 4.77 4.93 4.96

    Hot water +
    LDPE + 1% 4.71 4.80 4.85 4.92 4.95
    perforation
    Data table 05: pulp texture
    Scale:
    1= complete texture
    2=slight loss of texture
    3=moderate loss of texture
    4= intense loss of texture
    5= complete loss of texture

    Pulp texture at different days

    Treatment 00 03 06 09 12

    Sample-1 Sample-2 Sample-3 Sample-4 Sample-5

    control 1 1 2 3 3

    Hot water +
    LDPE 1 1 2 3 4

    Hot water +
    LDPE + 1% 1 1 2 2 3
    perforation
    Data table 06: presence of off odour
    Scale: 1= absent, 2= fair, 3=moderate, 4= intense, 5=very intense

    Off-odor at different days


    Treatment Sample
    No.

    00 03 06 09 12

    A 1 1 2 2 3

    control B 1 1 2 3 3

    C 1 2 2 3 3

    D 1 1 2 2 3

    A 1 2 3 3 4
    Hot water
    + B 1 2 2 3 4
    LDPE C 1 3 3 4 5

    D 1 2 3 3 4

    Hot water A 1 1 2 3 3
    +
    LDPE+ B 1 1 2 3 3
    1%
    PERFORA- C 1 2 3 3 4
    TION D 1 2 2 3 3
    Data table 07: overall acceptability
    Scale; 1= excellent, 2= good, 3= regular, 4= bad, 5= very bad

    Overall acceptability at different days


    Treatment Sample
    No.

    00 03 06 09 12

    A 1 1 2 3 4

    control B 1 2 3 3 4

    C 1 2 3 3 4

    D 1 2 2 3 4

    A 1 2 4 5 5
    Hot water
    + B 1 2 3 3 4
    LDPE
    C 1 2 4 5 5

    D 1 2 3 4 5

    Hot water A 1 2 3 4 4
    +
    LDPE+ B 1 2 3 3 3
    1%
    PERFORA- C 1 2 3 3 3
    TION
    D 1 2 2 3 2
    Data table 08: disease severity
    Scale: 1= 0% fruit surface rotten, 2= 1-25%, 3= 25-60%, 4= 51-75%, 5= 76-100%

    Disease severity at different days


    Treatment Sample
    No.

    00 03 06 09 12

    A 1 1 1 2 2

    control B 1 1 1 2 2

    C 1 1 2 2 3

    D 1 1 1 2 2

    A 1 2 4 4 5
    Hot water
    + B 1 1 2 3 4
    LDPE
    C 1 1 2 4 5

    D 1 2 3 4 4

    Hot water A 1 1 1 2 3
    +
    LDPE B 1 1 1 1 2
    +
    1%PERFORA-
    C 1 1 1 2 3
    TION

    D 1 1 1 2 2
    Data table 09: disease incidence

    Diseases incidence at different days

    Treatment
    00 03 06 09 12

    Infected % Infected % Infected % Infected % Infected %

    control 0 0 0 0 1 25 2 50 3 75
    Hot water
    +
    LDPE 0 0 1 25 1 25 3 75 4 100

    Hot water +
    LDPE + 1% 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 25 2 50
    perforation

    Calculation:

    You might also like