INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per
Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)

Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality Modeled Modeled Modeled Modeled

Education Knowledge and applications of effective effective effective effective
Services Pedagogy content knowledge applications of applications of applications of applications of
within and across content content content content
curriculum teaching knowledge within knowledge within knowledge within knowledge within
areas. and across and across and across and across
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
teaching areas teaching areas teaching areas teaching areas
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from
supported by any colleagues and colleagues and colleagues and
1 of the other supported by any supported by any supported by any
MOV given 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted Proposed action
Education colleagues in the completed and completed action action research research with
Services conduct and disseminated research with with colleagues colleagues
application of action research colleagues
research to enrich with colleagues
knowledge of
content and
pedagogy
 2. Collaborated with Performance Indicators
colleagues in the
Weight
conduct and
MFOs KRAs Objectives
application of Timeline per
Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
research to enrich KRA QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)
knowledge of
content and
pedagogy Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1
least 4 of the of the acceptable MOV MOV
given MOV MOV

Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the

research report research report research report research report
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating
period period period period

Basic 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated

Education applied effective effective effective effective effective
Services teaching strategies teaching teaching teaching teaching
to promote critical strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
and creative promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
thinking, as well as and creative and creative and creative and creative
other higherorder thinking, as well thinking, as well thinking, as well thinking, as well
thinking skills as other as other as other as other
higherorder higherorder higherorder higherorder
thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

more lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and
supported by any supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given MOV given MOV given given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Education Environment colleagues to model management management management management
Services and Diversity of and share effective strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
Learners techniques in the engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
management of in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks
classroom structure as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
to engage learners, MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
individually or in rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
groups, in
meaningful
exploration, Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
discovery and least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson supported
hands-on activities supported by supported by supported by by any of the
within a range of MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any acceptable MOV
physical learning 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
environments. acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
 individually or in
groups, in
meaningful
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on activities Performance Indicators
within a range of
physical learning
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives
environments. Timeline per
Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)

Timeliness
Basic 5. Exhibited Quality Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited
Education effective and effective and effective and effective and effective and
Services constructive constructive constructive constructive constructive
behavior behavior behavior behavior behavior
management skills management management management management
by applying positive skills by applying skills by applying skills by applying skills by applying
and non-violent positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
discipline to ensure violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline
learning focused to ensure to ensure to ensure to ensure
environments learning focused learning focused learning focused learning focused
environments environments environments environments
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Applied at least 7 Applied at least 7 Applied at least 7 Applied any of

of the given of the given of the given the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in only
least 4 lessons lessons lessons 1 lesson

Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with
Education colleagues to share colleagues at colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues but
Services differentiated, least in the school level to department or no evidence of
developmentally district/cluster share lesson grade level to sharing with
appropriate level to share share lesson others
opportunities to lesson
address learners’
differences in
gender, needs,
strengths, interests Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at
and experiences least 1 lesson as least 1 lesson as least 1 lesson as least 1 lesson, as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidenced by
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and either MOV 2 or
supported by any supported by any supported by any 3 but no
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV evidence of
sharing with
others

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per
Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and
Education and Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective
Services strategies in the strategies strategies strategies strategies
planning and showing showing showing showing
management of developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally - sequenced - sequenced - sequenced - sequenced
sequenced teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
and learning learning process learning process learning process learning process
processes to meet as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
curriculum MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
requirements and rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
varied teaching
contexts.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1
least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the
and supported by and supported by and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
any 1 of the any 1 of the supported by any
other acceptable other acceptable 1 of the other
MOV MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led
Education colleagues, teacher collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative
Services and learner reviews of reviews of reviews of reviews of
feedback to plan, teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and
facilitate and enrich learner feedback learner feedback learner feedback learner feedback
teaching practice. as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by
the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative
reviews of reviews of reviews of review of teacher
teacher and teacher and teacher and and learner
learner feedback learner feedback learner feedback feedback as
as evidently as evidently as evidently evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 in any of the
and supported by and supported by and supported by acceptable MOV
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per
Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)

Basic 9. Advised and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised

Education guided colleagues in advised advised advised colleagues in the
Services the selection, colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the selection,
organization, selection, selection, selection, organization,
development and organization, organization, organization, development and
use of appropriate development and development and development and appropriate use
teaching and appropriate use appropriate use appropriate use of teaching and
learning resources, of teaching and of teaching and of teaching and learning
including ICT, to learning learning learning resources as
address specific resources as resources as resources as shown in the
learning goals. shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

least 4 teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and
and learning learning learning learning resource
resources as resources as resources as as evidenced by
evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by at any of the
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed
Education and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively
Services colleagues to review collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment tools
the design, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues
selection, with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues as shown in the
organization and as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
use of a range of MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
effective diagnostic,
formative and
summative Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
assessment least 4 assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool
strategies consistent assessment tools as evidently as evidently as evidently
with curriculum as evidently shown in any of shown in any of shown in any of
requirements shown in any of the acceptable the acceptable the acceptable
the acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per
Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)

Basic 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely

Education collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with
Services monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
of attainment data to assessment data assessment data assessment data assessment data
support learner as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1

least 2 different least 3 of the least 2 of the of the MOV
types of MOV same kind of same kind of
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely applied
Education the effective applied skills in applied skills in applied skills in skills in the
Services communication of the effective the effective the effective effective
learner needs, communication communication communication communication
progress and of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs
achievement to key and progress to and progress to and progress to and progress to
stakeholders, parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
including guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
parents/guardians. shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1

least 3 of the MOV MOV MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed
Education various related performed performed performed special tasks
Services works/activities that special tasks special tasks special tasks and/or
contribute to the and/or and/or and/or assignments as
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as shown in the
process shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1

least 4 different different kinds of different kinds of of the acceptable
kinds of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per
Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)

RATER RATEE APPROVIN

T AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Rater:

Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

rformance Indicators Rating

Actual
Score
Poor Results Q E T Ave
(1)

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
rformance Indicators Rating

Actual
Score
Poor Results Q E T Ave
(1)

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
rformance Indicators Rating

Actual
Score
Poor Results Q E T Ave
(1)

No acceptable
evidence
shown

No acceptable
evidence
shown
Timeliness

No acceptable
evidence
shown

No acceptable
evidence
shown
rformance Indicators Rating

Actual
Score
Poor Results Q E T Ave
(1)

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
rformance Indicators Rating

Actual
Score
Poor Results Q E T Ave
(1)

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
rformance Indicators Rating

Actual
Score
Poor Results Q E T Ave
(1)

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
rformance Indicators Rating

Actual
Score
Poor Results Q E T Ave
(1)

RATING FOR
OVERALL
ACCOMPLISH
-MENTS

APPROVING AUTHORITY
 COMPETENCIES

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES

Self-Management
1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development.
2. Understands personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and takes
into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals. 5
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to
achieve goals.
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.

Professionalism and Ethics

1. Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and
Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713).
2. Practice ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the
impact of his/her actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and 4
punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.
5. Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs,
improve system and help others improve their effectiveness.

Results Focus
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work in
terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required. 4.5
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency.
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve
performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost,
more efficiently, or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any
specific goal

5 – Role model; 4 – Consistently demonstrates; 3 – Most of the time demonstrates; 2 – Sometimes demonstrate; 1 – Rarely demonstrate
 COMPETENCIES

Teamwork
1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment
across the organization.
3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 5
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
accomplish organization goals and objectives.

Service Orientation
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service
issues and concerns.
3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on 4.5
DEPED strategies and directions.
5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures
that will further enhance service delivery.

Innovation
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new
ideas, processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational
efficiency).
2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on
improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.
3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or 5
solutions.
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the
work unit and organization.
5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates
resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.

s; 2 – Sometimes demonstrate; 1 – Rarely demonstrate

4.67
 PART IV: DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental
Intervention)
A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies Feedback:

Feedback:

_____________________ ________________________
RATEE RATER
RT IV: DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Timeline Resources Needed

________________________ ________________________
RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY
 SUGGESTED MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline MOV Performance Target Ratee (Teacher)
KRA
Rating
Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

*Please see attached list of MOV

_________________________ ________________________
RATEE RATER
STED MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Rater:

Date of Review:

Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-Year Review
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Results
Remarks Rating Remarks

________________________
APPROVING AUTHORITY
 PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM

SIGNATURE
DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ACTION PLAN (RATER/RATEE)