Seattle School District Complaint 110719
Seattle School District Complaint 110719
Seattle School District Complaint 110719
The Honorable
1
10 Plaintiff, No.
11 v.
COMPLAINT
12 JUUL Labs, Inc. f/k/a PAX Labs, Inc., PAX JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Labs, Inc., Eonsmoke, LLC, Altria Group, Inc.,
13 Altria Client Services, Altria Group Distribution
14 Company, Nu Mark LLC, and Nu Mark
Innovations, Ltd.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1
3 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ....................................................................................... 6
4
III. PARTIES .......................................................................................................................... 6
5
IV. ALLEGATIONS OF FACT ............................................................................................. 8
6
A. Redesigning “the Most Successful Consumer Product of All Time” ................... 8
7
B. Following Big Tobacco’s Footsteps ................................................................... 14
8
C. The Secret to JUUL’s Success: Hooking Kids ................................................... 18
9
D. Eonsmoke Capitalizes on JUUL’s Success......................................................... 30
10
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1 I. INTRODUCTION
2 1. One of the great public health success stories over the past decade has been a
3
reduction in youth tobacco use and in nicotine addiction. Youth smoking rates plummeted from
4
28% in 2000 to 7.6% in 2017.1 This success has been the result of years of litigation and strict
5
regulation. It is also due to a public health message that Big Tobacco can no longer dispute or
6
8 2. This incredible progress towards eliminating youth use of tobacco products has
9 now largely been reversed due to e-cigarettes and vaping. Between 2017 and 2018, e-cigarette
10 use increased 78% among high school students nationwide, from 11.7% of high school students
11
in 2017 to 20.8% of high schoolers in 2018.2 Among middle school students, e-cigarette use
12
increased 48% between 2017 and 2018.3 The increase in youth nicotine vaping from 2017 to
13
2018 was the largest for any substance tracked by the national Monitoring the Future surveys
14
15 over the past 44 years.4 Youth vaping rates continued to climb from 2018 to 2019, such that
16 vaping prevalence more than doubled among each grade level surveyed—8th, 10th, and 12th
17 graders—in the past two years.5 In 2018, 3.6 million middle and high school students reported
18
19
20
21 1
Meredith Berkman, Testimony of Meredith Berkman, Parents Against Vaping E-cigarettes, U.S. House Committee
on Oversight & Reform (July 24, 2019),
22 https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/2019.07.24%20Berkman-
PAVe%20Testimony.pdf.
23 2
Jerome Adams, Surgeon General’s Advisory on E-cigarette Use Among Youth, Ctrs. for Disease Control &
Prevention (Dec. 2018), https://e-cigarettes.surgeongeneral.gov/documents/surgeon-generals-advisory-on-e-
24 cigarette-use-among-youth-2018.pdf.
3
2018 NYTS Data: A startling rise in youth e-cigarette use, U.S. Food & Drug Admin. (Feb. 2, 2019),
25 https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/youth-and-tobacco/2018-nyts-data-startling-rise-youth-e-cigarette-use.
4
Trends in Adolescent Vaping, New Eng. J. Med. (Oct. 10, 2019),
26
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1910739.
5
Id.
1 using e-cigarettes, an increase of 1.5 million youth.6 This record increase was repeated between
2 2018 and 2019, bringing the number of youth e-cigarette users to over 5 million.7
3
3. Plaintiff Seattle School District No. 1 (“Plaintiff” or “Seattle Public Schools” or
4
“SPS”) has experienced a rapid increase in vaping by its students consistent with these national
5
numbers. Seattle Public Schools is the largest K-12 school system in Washington State, with
6
7 approximately 53,000 students in 102 schools. In 2018, more than one in every four SPS high
8 school seniors reported vaping in the past 30 days.8 Between 2016 and 2018, e-cigarette use
9 increased 229% among SPS 10th graders.9 SPS administrators report that in the last two years,
10 vaping in school bathrooms has become a real issue, with kids congregating in the bathrooms,
11
vapor clouds setting off fire alarms, and assistant principals and security having to devote
12
significant time to increased hall sweeps. Throughout the district, 90% percent of tobacco and
13
nicotine violations during the 2017-2018 school year were for vaping, and over 60% of those
14
16 4. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) Director
17 Robert Redfield, “The skyrocketing growth of young people’s e-cigarette use over the past year
18
threatens to erase progress made in reducing tobacco use. It’s putting a new generation at risk for
19
20
21
6
Supra note 3.
22 7
Youth Tobacco Use: Results from the National Youth Tobacco Survey, U.S. Food & Drug Admin. (2019),
https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/youth-and-tobacco/youth-tobacco-use-results-national-youth-tobacco-
23 survey#1.
8
Healthy Youth Survey 2018 Report of Participating Schools: Seattle Public Schools Grades 6, 8, 10, and 12
24
(“Healthy Youth Survey 2018”) at 11, Healthy Youth Survey (Mar. 1, 2019),
https://www.seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/CoordSchoolHealth/Healt
25 hyYouthSurvey/HYS%20All%20grades%20Final.pdf.
9
Id.
26 10
Amy Radil, Seattle experts say restrictions on vaping must go further, KUOW (Nov.21, 2018),
https://kuow.org/stories/as-students-embrace-juuling-seattle-experts-say-restrictions-must-go-farther.
1 nicotine addiction.”11 Former U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) Commissioner Scott
2 Gottlieb described the above statistics as “astonishing,” and both the FDA and the U.S. Surgeon
3
General have characterized youth vaping as an “epidemic.”12 The Secretary of the U.S.
4
Department of Health and Human Services declared that “[w]e have never seen use of any
5
substance by America’s young people rise as rapidly as e-cigarette use [is rising].”13
6
7 5. A major cause of this epidemic is Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc., the maker of the
8 JUUL e-cigarette. JUUL entered the e-cigarette market in 2015 and now controls over 70% of
9 it.14 Over a million JUUL e-cigarettes were sold between 2015 and 2017.15 In 2017, JUUL
10 generated over $224 million in retail sales, a 621% year-over-year increase.16 By June 2018,
11
sales had skyrocketed another 783%, reaching $942.6 million.17 The e-cigarette category as a
12
whole grew 97% to $1.96 billion in the same period, largely based on JUUL’s market success.18
13
A majority of high school and middle school students using e-cigarettes in 2019 reported JUUL
14
15
16 11
Texas governor signs law increasing the age to buy tobacco products to 21, CNN (June 8, 2019),
https://m.cnn.com/en/article/h_b4cf0b92fd821251a4ae48df9b717145.
17 12
Angelica LaVito, FDA chief Gottlieb threatens to pull e-cigarettes off market if ‘astonishing’ surge in teen use
doesn’t slow, CNBC (Nov. 16, 2018), https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/fda-chief-gottlieb-threatens-to-pull-e-
18 cigarettes-off-market.html; Jayne O’Donnell, FDA declares youth vaping an epidemic, announces investigation,
new enforcement, USA Today (Sept. 12, 2018), https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/12/fda-
19 scott-gottlieb-youth-vaping-e-cigarettes-epidemic-enforcement/1266923002/.
13
Jan Hoffman, Study Shows Big Rise in Teen Vaping This Year, N.Y. Times (Dec. 17, 2018),
20 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/health/ecigarettes-teens-nicotine-.html; Rajiv Bahl, Teen Use of Flavored
Tobacco was Down, But E-Cigarettes Are Bringing It Back Up, Healthline (Jan. 9, 2019),
21 https://www.healthline.com/health-news/flavored-tobacco-use-rising-again-among-teens#An-unhealthy-habit.
14
Richard Craver, Juul ends 2018 with 76 percent market share, Winston-Salem J. (Jan. 8, 2019),
22 https://www.journalnow.com/business/juul-ends-with-percent-market-share/article_6f50f427-19ec-50be-8b0c-
d3df18d08759.html.
23 15
Melia Robinson, How a startup behind the ‘iPhone of vaporizers’ reinvented the e-cigarette and generated $224
million in sales in a year, Bus. Insider (Nov. 21, 2017), https://www.businessinsider.com/juul-e-cigarette-one-
24 million-units-sold-2017-11/.
16
Id.
25 17
Angelica LaVito, Popular e-cigarette Juul’s sales have surged almost 800 percent over the past year, CNBC
26 Health & Sci. (Sept. 11, 2018), https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/02/juul-e-cigarette-sales-have-surged-over-the-
past-year.html.
18
Id.
1 as their usual brand.19 JUUL’s dominance of the e-cigarette market has been so rapid, and so
2 complete, that the act of vaping is now often referred to as “juuling.”
3
6. Other companies have noticed this success and capitalized on it. Defendant
4
Eonsmoke, LLC (“Eonsmoke”) explicitly traded on JUUL’s market share, promoting its own
5
products as “JUUL compatible” and using JUUL’s hashtags to market and sell its products to
6
7 JUUL users. Eonsmoke understood that many JUUL users were youth and marketed its products
8 to these children, initiating a successful “Doit4juul” social media campaign and offering its
9 JUUL-compatible pods with flavors including “Sour Gummy,” “Pineapple Crush,” and “Pink
10 Lemonade.”20
11
7. JUUL’s market dominance also attracted the attention of government regulators,
12
including the FDA. On February 24, 2018, the FDA sent a letter to JUUL expressing concern
13
about the popularity of its products among youth and demanding that JUUL produce documents
14
15 regarding its marketing practices.21 On September 12, 2018, the FDA sent letters to JUUL and
16 other e-cigarette manufacturers putting them on notice that their products were being used by
17 youth at disturbing rates.22 In October 2018, the FDA raided JUUL’s headquarters and seized
18
more than a thousand documents relating to JUUL’s sales and marketing practices.23 As of
19
October 2019, the FDA, the Federal Trade Commission, multiple state attorneys general, and the
20
21
19
Karen A. Cullen et al., e-Cigarette Use Among Youth in the United States, 2019, JAMA (Nov. 5, 2019),
22 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2755265.
20
Enosmoke, LLC Warning Letter, U.S. Food & Drug Admin. (Oct. 24, 2019), https://www.fda.gov/inspections-
23 compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/eonsmoke-llc-592097-10242019.
21
Matthew Holman, Letter from Director of Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, to Zaid Rouag, at
24
JUUL Labs, Inc., U.S. Food & Drug Admin. (Apr. 14, 2018), https://www.fda.gov/media/112339/download.
22
25 Letter From US FDA to Kevin Burns, U.S. Food & Drug Admin. (Sept. 12, 2018),
https://www.fda.gov/media/119669/download.
23
26 Laurie McGinley, FDA seizes Juul e-cigarette documents in surprise inspection of headquarters, Wash. Post
(Oct. 2, 2018), https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2018/10/02/fda-seizes-juul-e-cigarette-documents-
surprise-inspection-headquarters/.
1 U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform have all commenced
2 investigations into JUUL’s role in the youth vaping epidemic and whether JUUL’s marketing
3
practices purposefully targeted youth.
4
8. As the pressure on JUUL intensified in late 2018, Defendant Altria Group, Inc.—
5
maker of Marlboro cigarettes, parent company of Philip Morris USA, and one of the largest
6
7 tobacco companies in the world—stepped in to assist. On December 20, 2018, Altria announced
8 a $12.8 billion equity investment in JUUL, which gave it a 35% stake in the company. Just
9 several weeks prior to this announcement, Altria had criticized JUUL’s marketing practices in a
10 letter to the FDA and declared that “pod-based products significantly contribute to the rise in
11
youth use of e-vapor products.” Altria removed its own pod-based products, the MarkTen Elite
12
and Apex by MarkTen, from the market—only to commit its substantial resources, regulatory
13
knowledge, and lobbying muscle to protecting and expanding JUUL’s market share, which, as
14
16 9. JUUL and Altria are now describing their collaboration as a “harm reduction
17 opportunity,” and JUUL insists it never marketed to youth. These assertions fall flat against the
18
facts, as detailed below. Altria has described JUUL’s device as “compelling” and “a terrific
19
product.” In fact, JUUL has compelled a generation of youth, who were never cigarette smokers,
20
into nicotine addiction and put them at risk for severe lung injury or other health harms resulting
21
from aerosol inhalation. JUUL and Altria are working to maintain JUUL’s record-breaking sales
22
23 and market dominance—which is not possible if the customer base is only adult smokers seeking
24 to quit.
25 10. Seattle Public Schools brings this action against Defendants JUUL Labs, Inc. f/k/a
26
PAX Labs, Inc. (“JUUL”), PAX Labs, Inc., Eonsmoke, LLC, and Altria Group, Inc. and its
1 subsidiaries Altria Client Services, Altria Group Distribution Company, and Nu Mark, LLC, and
2 Nu Mark Innovations, Ltd (collectively “Altria Defendants”), for damages and injunctive relief,
3
including abatement of the public health crisis caused by Defendants’ wrongful conduct.
4
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5
11. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
6
7 1331 because Plaintiff’s racketeering claim arises under the laws of the United States, 18 U.S.C.
8 § 1961, et seq., and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) because: (i) the amount in controversy
9 exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interests and costs, and (ii) the plaintiff and defendants are citizens
10 of different states. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims pursuant to
11
28 U.S.C. § 1367.
12
12. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they do business in
13
the Western District of Washington and have sufficient minimum contacts with this District.
14
15 Defendants intentionally avail themselves of the markets in this State through the promotion,
16 marketing, and sale of the products at issue in this lawsuit, and by retaining the profits and
17 proceeds from these activities, to render the exercise of jurisdiction by this Court permissible
18
under Washington law and the U.S. Constitution.
19
13. Venue is proper in the Western District of Washington pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
20
1391 (b)(2) and (3) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims
21
at issue in this Complaint arose in this District and Defendants are subject to the Court’s personal
22
24 III. PARTIES
25 14. Plaintiff Seattle School District No. 1 (“Plaintiff” or “Seattle Public Schools” or
26
“SPS”) is a school district located in King County, Washington. Seattle Public Schools is the
1 largest kindergarten through twelfth grade school system in Washington. Seattle Public Schools
2 serves approximately 53,000 students at 102 schools.
3
15. Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc., f/k/a PAX Labs, Inc. (“JUUL”), incorporated in
4
Delaware on March 12, 2007 (file no. 4315504), and has its principal place of business in San
5
Francisco, California. JUUL manufactures, designs, sells, markets, promotes and distributes
6
8 16. Defendant PAX Labs, Inc., incorporated in Delaware on April 21, 2017 (file no.
9 6387684), has its principal place of business in San Francisco, California. PAX Labs, Inc.’s
10 current website says it was founded in 2007. For much of the relevant time period and until at
11
least 2017, PAX Labs, Inc. and JUUL operated as the same company. During that time, JUUL
12
manufactured, designed, sold, marketed, promoted, and distributed JUUL e-cigarettes,
13
JUULpods, and accessories as a part of PAX Labs, Inc.
14
15 17. Defendant Eonsmoke, LLC, is a New Jersey limited liability company with its
16 principal place of business in Clifton, New Jersey. Eonsmoke markets and sells “Juul
17 Compatible” Eonsmoke and Eonsmoke v2.0 electronic vapor devices and flavor pods, as well as
18
4X pods.
19
18. Defendant Altria Group, Inc. is a Virginia corporation, having its principal place
20
of business in Richmond, Virginia. Altria is one of the world’s largest producers and marketers
21
of tobacco products. On December 20, 2018, Altria purchased a 35% stake in JUUL.
22
23 19. Defendant Altria Client Services Inc. is a New York corporation and wholly
24 owned subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc. with its principal place of business in Henrico County,
25 Virginia. Altria Client Services Inc. provides Altria Group, Inc. and its companies with services
26
in many areas including digital marketing, packaging design & innovation, product development,
1 and safety, health, and environmental affairs. On September 25, 2019, the former senior vice
2 president and chief growth officer of Altria Client Services Inc., K.C. Crosthwaite, became the
3
new chief executive of JUUL.
4
20. Defendant Altria Group Distribution Company is a Virginia corporation and
5
wholly owned subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc. with its principal place of business in Henrico
6
7 County, Virginia. Altria Group Distribution Company provides sales, distribution and consumer
9 21. Defendant Nu Mark LLC is a Virginia corporation and wholly owned subsidiary
10 of Altria Group, Inc., with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. Nu Mark LLC
11
was engaged in the manufacture and sale of Altria’s electronic vapor products. Shortly before
12
Altria purchased a 35% stake in JUUL in December 2018, Altria Group, Inc. announced that Nu
13
Mark would be discontinuing the production and sale of all e-vapor products.
14
16 Beit Shemesh, Israel. Nu Mark Innovations, Ltd. provides digital marketing and customer care
17 services for Nu Mark LLC and Altria’s e-vapor brands, as well as product and technology
18
development services.
19
IV. ALLEGATIONS OF FACT
20
A. Redesigning “the Most Successful Consumer Product of All Time”
21
23. JUUL was founded by Adam Bowen and James Monsees. The company’s
22
23 beginnings can be traced to the pair’s collaboration on a product design master’s thesis when
25
26
1 Fine Arts in Product Design, and Bowen a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering in
2 Product Design.24 Their proposed product? A better cigarette.
3
10
11
12
13
24. Monsees has described the cigarette as “the most successful consumer product of
14
all time . . . an amazing product.”25 But years of anti-smoking campaigns have successfully de-
15
16 normalized cigarette smoking. As part of their thesis research, Monsees and Bowen interviewed
17 smokers who talked about feeling self-conscious of the signs of smoking, for example, coming
18 back into a room after a smoke break and smelling like smoke, or having their hands smell like
19
cigarettes no matter even after washing them multiple times.26 When Monsees and Bowen
20
presented their thesis and product design to their classmates, they closed with a clip from a South
21
Park episode showing the characters assembled at the Museum of Tolerance and shaming a
22
23
24
24
Allison Keeley, Vice Made Nice?, Stanford Mag. (Aug. 2012), https://stanfordmag.org/contents/vice-made-nice.
25 25
Gabriel Montoya, Pax Labs: Origins with James Monsees, Social Underground (Jan. 2015),
26 https://socialunderground.com/2015/01/pax-ploom-origins-future-james-monsees/.
26
Jordan Crook, This is the Stanford thesis presentation that launched Juul, Tech Crunch (Feb. 27, 2019),
https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/27/this-is-the-stanford-thesis-presentation-that-launched-juul/.
1 smoker.27 Their goal was to design a cigarette without the stigma and self-consciousness smokers
2 experienced—as Monsees described it, to “deliver[] solutions that refresh the magic and luxury
3
of the tobacco category” and recreate the lost “ritual and elegance that smoking once
4
exemplified.”28
5
25. Essentially, Monsees and Bowen saw a market opportunity in a generation of
6
7 consumers brought up on anti-smoking norms. In Monsees’ words, they wanted to redesign the
8 cigarette “to meet the needs of people who want to enjoy tobacco but don’t self-identify with—
15 applies just as well to the product he and Bowen would launch a decade later—JUUL.
16 27. The outcome of Monsees and Bowen’s thesis project was a “heat-not-burn” e-
17 cigarette, which uses loose-leaf tobacco. The device heated tobacco contained in pods to a
18
constant temperature, vaporizing nicotine and flavor without burning the materials or producing
19
smoke.
20
28. After graduation, Bowen and Monsees worked on bringing their thesis project to
21
the market, incorporating under the name Ploom in 2007. In those early years, they spent a lot of
22
23
27
Id.
24 28
Onboardly Interview with Ploom Cofounder and CEO James Monsees, Pax.com,
https://web.archive.org/web/20161108110231/http://onboardly.com/entrepreneur-interviews/an-interview-with-
25 james-monsees/ (last visited Nov. 7, 2019).
29
Id.
26 30
Id.
31
See Crook, supra note 26.
1 time talking about what Bowen called “the kind of typical thoughts of evil Big Tobacco
2 companies like coming down and squashing you.”32 But ultimately, that “was not really an
3
issue.”33 In fact, not only did Big Tobacco not squash them, but the opposite. Although Bowen
4
and Monsees characterized their products as aimed toward consumers not aligned with
5
traditional tobacco products, they themselves have aligned with Big Tobacco on at least two
6
8 29. In 2010, Ploom launched its e-cigarette as the ModelOne, using pods of loose-leaf
9 tobacco heated by butane. It did not catch on. Ploom only sold a few thousand of them. By then a
10 company with a dozen employees, Ploom was faltering, in need of money, technological
11
expertise, and marketing savvy.34
12
30. Help came from Japan Tobacco International (“JTI”), a division of Japan Tobacco
13
Inc., the fourth-largest tobacco company in the world. In December 2011, JTI and Ploom entered
14
15 into a strategic agreement, which gave JTI a minority stake in Ploom and made it a strategic
16 partner. In a statement regarding the agreement, Monsees said, “We are very pleased to partner
17 with JTI as their deep expertise, global distribution networks and capital resources will enable us
18
to enter our next phase of growth and capitalize on global expansion opportunities.”35 As Bowen
19
explained in an interview, “We were still doing a lot of our own internal product development,
20
but now we had access to floors of scientists at JTI.”
21
22
23 32
Keeley, supra note 24.
33
Id.
24 34
David H. Freedman, How Do You Sell a Product When You Can't Really Say What It Does?, Inc.com (May
25 2014), https://www.inc.com/magazine/201405/david-freedman/james-monsees-ploom-ecigarette-company-
marketing-dilemma.html.
35
26 Innovative Partnership for Ploom and Japan Tobacco International JTI to Take Minority Share in Ploom, Japan
Tobacco Int’l (Dec. 8, 2011), https://www.jti.com/sites/default/files/press-releases/documents/2011/innovative-
partnership-for-ploom-and-japan-tobacco-international.pdf.
1 31. In 2012, Ploom unveiled the PAX, a loose-leaf vaporizer that didn’t use pods, but
2 which was much more successful. The following year, Ploom combined elements of the PAX
3
with the pod system as the ModelTwo. Although consumers were enthusiastic about both the
4
PAX and the ModelTwo, the products were limited to a small, high-end market. The PAX, for
5
example, retailed for $250 when it was first marketed. But, as one of Ploom’s investors remarked
6
7 in 2014, “The company is going to invade the bigger, lower-end market now dominated by e-
8 cigarettes.”36 He explained that Ploom had “lots of products in the works” and that “we know we
9 need something cheaper than PAX to go after the mass market. There are still huge opportunities
10 out there.”37
11
32. In February 2015, Ploom and JTI ended their relationship, with buying back JTI’s
12
minority stake in the business. JTI acquired the ModelTwo and pods product line, as well as the
13
Ploom name, while Ploom kept its open-system PAX vaporizer and changed its name to PAX
14
15 Labs Inc. Monsees characterized the partnership as having “afforded both parties many mutual
16 benefits,” but said that the new arrangement would “fuel continued growth” and that PAX
23
24
25 36
Freedman, supra note 34.
37
Id.
26 38
JTI to Acquire Ploom Product Line, Convenient Store News (Feb. 16, 2015), https://csnews.com/jti-acquire-
ploom-product-line#close-olyticsmodal.
1 35. By the close of 2017, according to Nielsen data, JUUL had surpassed its
2 competitors in capturing 32.9 percent of the e-cigarette market, with British American Tobacco
3
at 27.4 percent and Altria at 15.2 percent.39 The total e-cigarette market expanded 40 percent to
4
$1.16 billion.40
5
36. In 2018, JUUL’s gross profit margins were 70%41 and it represented 76.1% of the
6
8 companies for alleged patent infringement, JUUL asserted that it was “now responsible for over
9 95% of the growth in the ENDS pod refill market in the United States” and included the
10 following chart:43
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 39
Ari Levy, E-cigarette maker Juul is raising $150 million after spinning out of vaping company, CNBC (Dec. 19,
2017), https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/19/juul-labs-raising-150-million-in-debt-after-spinning-out-of-pax.html.
23 40
Id.
41
Dan Primack, Scoop: The Numbers Behind Juul’s Investor Appeal, Axios (July 2, 2018),
24
https://www.axios.com/numbers-juul-investor-appeal-vaping-22c0a2f9-beb1-4a48-acee-5da64e3e2f82.html.
42
25 Robert K. Jackler et al., JUUL Advertising Over Its First Three Years on the Market 2, Stanford Res. into the
Impact of Tobacco Advert. (2019),
26 http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco_main/publications/JUUL_Marketing_Stanford.pdf.
43
Verified Complaint Under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at 6, In the Matter of Certain Cartridges for
Elec. Nicotine Delivery Sys. & Components Thereof, Investigation No. 337-TA-1141 (USITC Nov. 19, 2018).
1 37. JUUL shattered previous records for reaching decacorn status, reaching valuation
2 of over $10 billion in a matter of months—four times faster than Facebook.44 This all came just
3
three years after its product launch.
4
B. Following Big Tobacco’s Footsteps
5
38. JUUL’s staggering commercial success didn’t come from a blank slate. Under the
6
Master Settlement Agreement between Big Tobacco and the States, the public has access to
7
8 hundreds of thousands of Big Tobacco’s internal documents. In creating JUUL, Monsees and
9 Bowen carefully studied the marketing strategies, advertisements, and product design of Big
10 Tobacco. As Monsees candidly acknowledged, the internal tobacco documents “became a very
11
intriguing space for us to investigate because we had so much information that you wouldn’t
12
normally be able to get in most industries. And we were able to catch-up, right, to a huge, huge
13
industry in no time. And then we started building prototypes.”45
14
39. Monsees, Bowen, and their employees reviewed documents in the Big Tobacco
15
17 delivery in a vapor while minimizing the “throat hit” that may potentially deter new smokers.
18 Chenyue Xing, a chemist who worked for JUUL (then called PAX Labs) and helped patent its
19
liquid-nicotine formula, told Reuters that she recalled reviewing tobacco company records and
20
research. “We had consultants who were veterans of the big tobacco companies,” she said. “We
21
learned all the history.”46
22
23
24 44
Zack Guzman, Juul Surpasses Facebook As Fastest Startup to Reach Decacorn Status, Yahoo! Fin. (Oct. 9,
2018), https://finance.yahoo.com/news/juul-surpasses-facebook-fastest-startup-reach-decacorn-status-
25 153728892.html.
45
Montoya, supra note 25.
26 46
Chris Kirkham, Juul disregarded early evidence it was hooking teens, Reuters (Nov. 5, 2019),
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/juul-ecigarette/.
1 40. R.J. Reynolds had researched the addition of organic acids to reduce a cigarette’s
2 harshness while adding more nicotine, and JUUL followed this approach. JUUL added benzoic
3
acid to its nicotine liquid formula, which both reduced the nicotine’s harshness and delivered it
4
more directly to the user’s lungs and brain.47 The freebase nicotine in earlier e-cigarettes was
5
partly absorbed in the user’s mouth and throat, resulting in a much slower absorption by the
6
7 body.
8 41. JUUL’s new nicotine salts formulation was potent. Early testing sometimes
9 caused testers to shake or vomit.48 JUUL contemplated features that would automatically disable
10 the device after nicotine delivery exceeded a certain threshold; according to Xing, one idea was
11
to disable the device for 30 minutes following a certain number of puffs.49 But in the end JUUL
12
launched its product without any such features.
13
42. Instead, JUUL’s sales force emphasized the addictiveness of its formulation to
14
15 persuade retailers to give the new product shelf space. Vincent Latronica, head of East Coast
16 sales and distribution for JUUL (then called PAX Labs) from 2014 until early 2016, told Reuters
17 that he used a chart showing JUUL’s rapid delivery of nicotine to the bloodstream as a way to
18
convince store owners that they would have repeat business and not be left with unsold
19
inventory, and this became a central selling point for the new product.50 JUUL’s sales team was,
20
in Latronica’s words, “relentless.”51
21
22
23
24
47
Id.
25 48
Id.
49
Id.
26 50
Id.
51
Id.
1 43. Other records from the Big Tobacco archive relate to tobacco industry market
2 strategies and advertisements designed to lure non-smoking youth. Monsees and Bowen were
3
able to take advantage of an extensive online tobacco advertising research database maintained
4
by the Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising (“SRITA”), an inter-
5
disciplinary research group devoted to researching the promotional activities of the tobacco
6
15 was essential to the tobacco industry’s success and longevity, as an internal Philip Morris
16 document makes clear: “It is important to know as much as possible about teenage smoking
17 patterns and attitudes. Today’s teenager is tomorrow’s potential regular customer, and the
18
overwhelming majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their teens.”54 Tobacco
19
companies have focused on the 14 to 24-year-old age group because “young smokers have been
20
the critical factor in the growth” of their business.55 As the Vice-President of Marketing at R.J.
21
Reynolds Tobacco Company [“RJR”] explained in 1974, the “young adult market . . .
22
23
24
52
Jackler et al., supra note 42 at 27.
25 53
Amended Final Opinion at 972, U.S. v. Philip Morris, No. 99- 2496 (D.D.C. Aug. 17, 2006), ECF No. 5750.
54
Tobacco Company Quotes on Marketing to Kids, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (May 14, 2001),
26
https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/factsheets/0114.pdf.
55
Id.
1 represent[s] tomorrow’s cigarette business. As this 14-24 age group matures, they will account
2 for a key share of the total cigarette volume—for at least the next 25 years.”56
3
45. RJR’s now- infamous Joe Camel “ambassador of Cool” advertising campaign,
4
which ran from 1988 through 1997, exemplifies the importance the tobacco industry placed on
5
hooking young smokers early:57
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
46. Big Tobacco, of course, is now prohibited from employing these tactics and
19
strategies to market traditional cigarettes by virtue of the Master Settlement Agreement and
20
22
23
24
56
25 C.A. Tucker, Marketing Plans Presentation to RJRI B of D, Truth Tobacco Industry Documents, U. of S.F. (Sept.
30, 1974), https://www.industrydocumentslibrary.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/#id=ypmw0091.
57
26 Joe Camel: Character of the Year Advertisement, Stanford U. Res. into the Impact of Tobacco Advert. (1990),
http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco_main/images.php?token2=fm_st138.php&token1=fm_img4072.php&theme_
file=fm_mt015.php&theme_name=Targeting%20Teens&subtheme_name=Joe%20Camel.
9 D. pay any person to “use, display, make reference to or use as a prop any
Tobacco Product, Tobacco Product package . . . in any “Media;”
10
E. pay any third party to conduct any activity which the tobacco
11 manufacturer is prohibited from doing; or
12
F. sell “flavored” cigarettes.
13
48. All of these above activities were prohibited because of their effectiveness at
14
appealing to youth. As described below, all of these activities figured prominently in JUUL’s
15
marketing campaign.
16
18 University School of Medicine and principal investigator for SRITA, JUUL’s initial marketing
19 was “patently youth oriented.”58 The JUUL’s 2015 ad campaign, called “Vaporized” was
20
designed to create a “cult-like following.”59 Its imagery featured a vivid color scheme and
21
models in their twenties in poses that researchers note are evocative of behaviors more
22
characteristic of underage teens than mature adults. 60 Dr. Jackler and his colleagues found it
23
24
58
25 Robert K. Jackler, The Role of the Company in the Juul Teen Epidemic, Testimony of Robert Jackler before the
House Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy (“Jackler Testimony”) at 2 (July 24, 2019),
26 https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/2019.07.24%20Jackler%20Testimony.pdf.
59
Id. at 4.
60
Jackler et al., supra note 42.
1 “clear” that this imagery resonated with underage teens who aspire to emulate trendsetting young
2 adults.61
3
50. Tobacco advertisers have long understood that teens are attracted to such imagery.
4
The Vaporized campaign was featured on the front page of VICE magazine, “the #1 youth media
5
company in the world.”62 In the summer of 2015, an animated series of Vaporized billboards,
6
7 with the campaign’s youth-appealing imagery, were displayed in New York’s Times Square.63
8 51. Over the first year after JUUL launched its ad campaign in June 2015, it held a
9 series of at least 50 highly stylized parties, typically with rock music entertainment, in cities
10 across the United States.64 Thousands of young people were given free nicotine-filled JUULpods
11
(appropriately named “JUUL starter kits”), and JUUL posted photos of various young people
12
enthusiastically puffing on JUULs across their social media channels.65 JUUL also featured
13
popular stars such as Katy Perry holding a JUUL at the Golden Globes.66
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
67
21
22 61
Id. at 7.
62
23 Id. at 5.
63
Id. at 17-18.
24 64
Id. at 3.
65
Id.
25 66
Jackler Testimony, supra note 58 at 8.
67
26 Kathleen Chaykowski, The Disturbing Focus of Juul’s Early Marketing Campaigns, Forbes (Nov. 16, 2018),
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kathleenchaykowski/2018/11/16/the-disturbing-focus-of-juuls-early-marketing-
campaigns/#3da1e11b14f9.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 52. JUUL knew these images would be successful in achieving this result because it
22 intentionally crafted them to mimic specific traditional tobacco advertisements that Big Tobacco
23 had used to target teens. In fact, many of JUUL’s ads are nearly identical to old cigarette ads that
24 were designed to get teens to smoke. Like its Big Tobacco predecessors, the focus of JUUL’s
25
initial marketing was on colorful ad campaigns using eye-catching designs and youth-oriented
26
1 imagery with themes of being cool, carefree, stylish, attractive, sexy, and popular—unusual
2 themes and images if one’s objective is to promote an adult’s only smoking cessation device.
3
9
68
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 69
17 53. JUUL used Big Tobacco’s advertising imagery, but coupled it with a modern,
18
state-of-the-art marketing campaign designed to target youth. It relied heavily on social media,
19
crafting a powerful online presence, which persists even after JUUL deleted its accounts in the
20
face of mounting public scrutiny. JUUL was particularly active on Instagram, which is the most
21
22 popular social media site among teens.70 JUUL cultivated hashtags, allowing it to blend its ads in
23
68
Virginia Slims vs Juul Advertisement, Stanford U. Res. into the Impact of Tobacco Advert. (2015),
24
http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco_main/images-
comp.php?token2=fm_tn_st328.php&token1=fm_tn_img10799.php&theme_file=fm_tn_mt035.php&theme_nam
25 e=Cigs%20vs.%20eCigs&subtheme_name=Cigs%20vs%20eCigs%20JUUL.
69
Julia Belluz, The Vape Company Juul Said It Doesn’t Target Teens. Its Early Ads Tell a Different Story, Vox
26
(Jan. 25, 2019), https://www.vox.com/2019/1/25/18194953/vape-juul-e-cigarette-marketing.
70
Jackler et al., supra note 42.
1 with wide range of user content, increasing exposure while concealing the commercial nature of
2 the content.71 JUUL then used hashtags to reinforce the themes it crafted in its product design,
3
like #style, #technology, #smart, and #gadget. JUUL’s hashtags attracted an enormous
4
community of youthful posts on a wide array of subjects. According to Dr. Jackler, #Juul
5
contains literally thousands of juvenile postings, and numerous Instagram hashtags contain the
6
8 54. Even after JUUL halted its own social media posts in November 2018, viral peer-
9 to-peer promotion among teens insured continued corporate and product visibility among
10 youth.73 In fact, community posts about JUUL increased after JUUL itself quit social media in
11
the Fall of 2018. Prior to November 2018, over a quarter of a million posts appeared. In the eight
12
months after JUUL halted its promotional postings, the rate of community postings increased
13
significantly, resulting in the number of posts doubling to over half a million.74
14
15 55. JUUL also paid social media influencers to post photos of themselves with JUUL
16 devices and to use the hashtags that it was cultivating.75 JUUL entered a contract with an
17 advertising agency specifically to identify and recruit social media influencers that had at least
18
30,000 followers to, according to an internal JUUL email, “establish a network of creatives to
19
leverage as loyalists” for the JUUL brand.76 One such influencer was Christina Zayas, whom
20
JUUL paid $1,000 for just one blog post and one Instagram post in the Fall of 2017.
21
22
71
23 Id. at 23.
72
Jackler Testimony, supra note 58 at 10.
24 73
Id. at 11.
74
Id.
25 75
Jackler et al., supra note 42.
76
26 Kenrick Cai, Juul Funded High Schools, Recruited Social Media Influencers To Reach Youth, House Panel
Charges, Forbes (July 25, 2019), https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrickcai/2019/07/25/juul-high-schools-
influencers-reach-youth-house-investigation/#57735a4a33e2.
10
11 77
12
56. JUUL instituted an “affiliate program” to recruit those who authored favorable
13
reviews of its products by providing such reviewers with a 20% discount of purchases of JUUL
14
products.78 It even recruited JUUL users to act as part of their marketing team by asking users to
15
17 57. Such tactics masked what were in fact JUUL advertisements as user content,
18 further increasing exposure and ultimately solidifying the company in teen pop culture as a form
19
of cultural currency. JUUL’s strategy was so successful in embedding its products into pop
20
culture that it entered the vernacular as a verb. The JUUL device and the term “juuling” are so
21
pervasive that JUUL effectively eliminated not only competitors, but also any potentially
22
alarming terms like “smoking” or “e-cigarette,” which could alert users to the true nature of the
23
24
25 77
Michael Nedelman et al., #Juul: How social media hyped nicotine for a new generation, CNN Health (Dec. 19,
2018), https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/17/health/juul-social-media-influencers/index.html.
26 78
Id. at 9-10.
79
Id. at 9.
1 device or activity. A recent study found that 63% of adolescent JUUL users did not know that
2 JUULpods contain nicotine.80 This has worked to JUUL’s advantage and was in fact a deliberate
3
part of the its strategy. In the first year after its launch, not one of JUUL’s 171 promotional
4
emails said anything about nicotine content,81 and it did not include nicotine warnings on the
5
JUUL packaging until August 2018, when it was forced to do so.
6
7 58. The design of JUUL’s product is also acutely attractive to youth. Unlike most of
8 its predecessors, JUUL looks nothing like a cigarette. Instead, JUUL is sleek and linear and
9 seems like the latest tech invention. This is not surprising, given the founders’ Silicon Valley
10 product design education and training. JUUL co-founder Adam Bowen drew on his experience
11
as a design engineer at Apple to make JUUL’s design mimic technology children were already
12
familiar with, like Apple’s I-Phone.82 This made JUULs look “more like a cool gadget and less
13
like a drug delivery device. This wasn’t smoking or vaping, this was JUULing.”83 The evocation
14
15 of technology makes JUUL device familiar and desirable to the younger tech-savvy generation,
17 iPhones now, normal kids have JUULs now. Because it looks so modern, we kind of trust
18
modern stuff a little bit more so we’re like, we can use it, we’re not going to have any trouble
19
with it because you can trust it.”84 15-year-old Sam Friedman agrees: “The tech aspect definitely
20
helps people get introduced to it and then once they’re introduced to it, they’re staying, because
21
they are conditioned to like all these different products. And then this is another product. And it’s
22
23
80
Juul e-Cigarettes Gain Popularity Among youth, But Awareness of Nicotine Presence Remains Low, Truth
24 Initiative (Apr. 18, 2018), https://truthinitiative.org/sites/default/files/media/files/2019/03/JUUL-E-cigarettes-
Gain-Popularity-Among-Youth-But-Awareness-of-Nicotine-Presence-Remains-Low.pdf.
25 81
Jackler et al., supra note 42 at 25.
82
How JUUL made nicotine go viral, Vox (Aug. 10, 2018), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFOpoKBUyok.
26 83
Id.
84
Id.
7 one senior at Eastlake High School in Washington State, “that’s what people tell the teachers a
8 lot, too, if you charge it in class, they’ll just say it’s my flash drive.”86
9 60. The ability to conceal a JUUL is also part of the appeal for adolescents. The
10 devices are small and slim, so they fit easily in a closed hand or a pocket. The ease and
11
simplicity of use—there is nothing to light or unwrap, not even an on-off switch—also make it
12
possible to covertly use a JUUL behind a turned back, which has become a trend in many
13
schools. Officer Jeff Borshiem of the Bellevue Police Department in Washington said JUUL use
14
15 is “incredibly prevalent in schools,” including both Bellevue High School and in middle schools,
16 and that it is hard to catch them in the act because JUUL doesn’t produce a big vapor cloud.
17 Borsheim told KOMO News that students will “just take a little hit or puff off them and then can
18
hold the vapor in their mouth for a little while . . . There’s minimal vapor. They’ll also just blow
19
into their sleeve or into their hoodie.”87 Finding new ways to hide the ever-concealable JUUL
20
has spawned products designed just for that purpose, such as apparel that allows the wearer to
21
use the device while it is concealed in the drawstring of a hoodie or the strap of a backpack.88
22
23
24 85
Id.
86
Juuling at School, KOMO News (2019), https://komonews.com/news/healthworks/dangerous-teen-trend-juuling-
25 at-school.
87
Id.
26 88
Evie Blad, ‘Juuling’ and Teenagers: 3 Things Principals and Teachers Need to Know, Educ. Wk. (July 18, 2018),
https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2018/07/18/juuling-and-teenagers-3-things-principals-and.html.
1 61. JUUL also created special flavors that make its addictive, high-tech device even
2 more attractive to adolescents. Tobacco companies have known for decades that flavored
3
products are key to nicotine adoption by youth. A 1972 Brown & Williamson memorandum:
4
“Youth Cigarette – New Concepts,” specifically noted the “well known fact that teenagers like
5
sweet products.”89 A 1979 Lorillard memorandum concluded that younger customers would be
6
7 “attracted to products with ‘less tobacco taste,” and even proposed borrowing data from the “Life
8 Savers” candy company to determine which flavors enjoyed the widest appeal among youth.90
9 According to 2004 data, 17-year-old smokers were more than three times likely as those over 25
10 to smoke flavored cigarettes and viewed flavored cigarettes as safer.91 For this reason, in 2009
11
the FDA banned flavored cigarettes pursuant to its new authority under the Family Smoking
12
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009. In announcing the ban, FDA Commissioner Dr.
13
Margaret Hamburg declared that “flavored cigarettes are a gateway for many children and young
14
15 adults to become regulator smokers.”92 A 2017 study of the cigarette flavor ban found that the
16 ban was effective in lowering both the number of smokers and the amount smoked by smokers,
17 though it was associated with an increased use of menthol cigarettes (the only flavor still
18
available).93
19
20
89
Marketing Innovations, Inc., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Project Report: Youth Cigarette—New
21 Concepts, U.C.S.F. Truth Tobacco Industry Documents (Sept. 1972), https://www.industrydocuments
.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/#id=hzpd0040.
22 90
Flavored Tobacco FAQs, Students Working Against Tobacco (citing Sedgefield Idea Sessions 790606-790607.
June 8, 1979. Bates No. 81513681/3691)
23 http://swatflorida.com/uploads/fightresource/Flavored%20Tobacco%20Industry%20Quotes%20
and%20Facts.pdf (as of Oct. 16, 2019).
24 91
Gardiner Harris, Flavors Banned From Cigarettes to Deter Youth, N.Y. Times (Sept. 22, 2009)
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/health/policy/23fda.html.
25 92
Id.
93
26 Charles J. Courtemanche et al., Influence of the Flavored Cigarette Ban on Adolescent Tobacco Use, Am. J. of
Preventive Med. 52(5):e139 - e146 (2017), https://tobacco.ucsf.edu/more-evidence-support-eliminating-flavors-
reduce-youth-cigarette-and-e-cigarette-use; MB. Harrell et al., Flavored e-cigarette use: Characterizing youth,
1 62. The use of flavors with e-cigarettes is just as problematic. According to the
2 Surgeon General, 85% of adolescents who use e-cigarettes use flavored varieties.94 Studies also
3
show that flavors motivate e-cigarette initiation among youth,95 and that youth are much more
4
likely to use flavored tobacco products than adults are.96 As Scott Neal, the tobacco prevention
5
program manager for Public Health Seattle & King County, put it: “I don’t think it’s rocket
6
7 science: We know flavors attract kids.”97 In September 2019, the State of Michigan banned
8 flavored e-cigarettes, a step the governor said was needed to protect young people from the
9 potentially harmful effects of vaping, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York announced that he
10 would pursue emergency regulations to ban the sake of flavored e-cigarettes, and Washington
11
Governor Jay Inslee ordered the Washington State Department of Health to ban all flavored
12
vapor products.98, 99
13
63. Despite JUUL’s claims that its target market is adult smokers, JUUL sold its
14
15 product in flavors like Cool Mint, Crème Brulee, Fruit Medley, Cucumber, and Mango. These
16 flavors undoubtedly made it easier for countless adolescents to start using JUUL products.
17
18 young adult, and adult users, Prev. Med Rep. 2017; 5: 33–40 (Nov. 11, 2016), doi:
10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.001 PMCID: PMC5121224.
19 94
E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults, U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Servs. (2016),
https://www.ctclearinghouse.org/Customer-Content/www/topics/2444-E-Cigarette-Use-Among-Youth-And-
20 Young-Adults.pdf (accessed Oct. 4, 2019).
95
Karl Paul, Flavored Vapes Lure Teens Into Smoking and Nicotine Addiction, Study Shows, MarketWatch (Feb.
21 26, 2019), https://www.marketwatch.com/story/flavored-vapes-lure-teens-into-smoking-and-nicotine-addiction-
study-shows-2019-02-25.
22 96
A.C. Villanti et al., Flavored Tobacco Product Use in Youth and Adults: Findings From the First Wave of the
PATH Study, 53 Am. J. of Preventative Med. 139 (2017), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28318902.
23 97
Radil, supra note 10.
98
24 Jesse McKinley & Christina Goldbaum, New York Moves to Ban Flavored E-Cigarettes by Emergency Order,
N.Y. Times (Sept. 15, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/15/nyregion/vaping-ban-
25 ny.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share.
99
Jay Inslee, Executive Order 19-03: Addressing the Vaping Use Public Health Crisis, State of Washington Office
26 of the Governor (Sept. 27, 2019), https://www.governor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/19-03%20-
%20Addressing%20the%20Vaping%20Public%20Health%20Crisis%20%28tmp%29.pdf?utm_medium=email
&utm_source=govdelivery.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
100
20
64. The flavors pose dangers beyond luring young people into trying nicotine. Studies
21
22 now show these sweet and fruity flavors present distinct additional health hazards. Researchers
23 have found that some of the chemicals JUUL uses for flavor and perfume—particularly in the
24
25
26
100
Chaykowski, supra note 67.
1 Crème Brulee flavor—contain relatively high levels of acetals.101 Acetals are airway-irritating
2 chemicals that may cause lung damage.102 Dr. Robert Jackler said that test results have shown
3
that JUUL’s sweet and fruity flavors “contribute[] to the increasing body of evidence
4
documenting toxicological effects of e-cig vapor.”103
5
65. JUUL was well aware from the beginning that its products would appeal to youth.
6
7 A former JUUL manager, who spoke to The New York Times on the condition that his name not
8 be used because he worried about facing the ire of the company, said that within months of
9 JUUL’s 2015 introduction, it became evident that teenagers were either buying JUULs online or
10 finding others who made the purchases for them. Some people bought more JUUL kits on the
11
company’s website than they could individually use—sometimes 10 or more devices at a time.
12
“First, they just knew it was being bought for resale,” said the former senior manager, who was
13
briefed on the company’s business strategy. “Then, when they saw the social media, in fall and
14
16 66. This “suspicion” has been confirmed by the U.S. Surgeon General, who found
17 that JUUL’s Twitter account was being followed by adolescents and that 25% of those re-
18
tweeting official JUUL tweets were under 18 years old.105 It is clear that JUUL, like Philip
19
Morris and RJR before it, targeted youth as a key business demographic. Unsurprisingly, JUUL’s
20
21
22
23 101
Susie Neilson, Irritating Compounds Can Show Up in ‘Vape Juice’, NPR (July 30, 2019),
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/07/30/746238009/irritating-compounds-discovered-in-vape-
24 juice.
102
Id.
25 103
Id.
104
Matt Richtel & Sheila Kaplan, Did Juul Lure Teenagers and Get ‘Customers for Life’?, N.Y. Times (Aug. 27,
26
2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/27/science/juul-vaping-teen-marketing.html.
105
Adams, supra note 2.
1 efforts to follow these pages of Big Tobacco’s playbook has yielded results: a recent study found
2 that 15 to 17-year-olds are 16 times more likely to use JUUL than 25 to 34-year-olds.106
3
D. Eonsmoke Capitalizes on JUUL’s Success
4
67. Defendant Eonsmoke took notice of JUUL’s successful marketing to youth and
5
saw it as an opportunity to profit.
6
68. Eonsmoke designs, markets, and distributes electronic cigarettes & accessories.
7
8 Eonsmoke makes its own electronic vaping device that resembles the JUUL’s device. Eonsmoke
9 also makes both closed systems pods, like those sold by JUUL, and open system pods that can be
10 filed by the user. Both Eonsmoke’s device and its pods are advertised as JUUL compatible,
11
meaning that users can use Eonsmoke’s device to vape JUULpods and they can also use JUUL’s
12
device to vape Eonsmoke’s pods:107
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
106
D.M. Vallone et al., Prevalence and correlates of Juul use among a national sample of youth and young adults,
24 Tobacco Control (Oct. 29, 2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054693.
107
Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (June 4, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/174567212961/mango-pods-6-
25 tastes-like-a-sweet-and-crisp (showing Eonsmoke mango pods compatible with Juul Device, captioned by
Eonsmoke as “Mango Pods 6%. Tastes like a sweet and crisp Mango! Follow @Eonsmoke); Eonsmoke Vapes,
26 Tumblr (June 18th, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/175012943246/blueberry-6-restocked-on-the-sites-
grab-yours (showing Eonsmoke blueberry pods compatible with Juul Device; captioned by Eonsmoke as
“Blueberry 6% restocked on the sites! Grab yours today while supplies last! Follow @Eonsmoke”).
3
69. Below is an image of the Eonsmoke device:108
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 70. Like JUUL’s device, Eonsmoke’s devices resemble flash drives. Eonsmoke
17 explicitly capitalized on this fact by advertising that users of its products could lie to their parents
18 and pretend the product was a flash drive. In a post on Eonsmoke’s Instagram page, the company
19
posted a photograph of its device with the caption “Mom! It’s a USB drive!! #eonsmoke.”109 On
20
this post, one user comments “I told my dad that about my old juul and he actually fell for it
21
lol.”110
22
23
24
25
108
Post by Instagram user “eonsmoke” on August 11, 2018.
26 109
Post by Instagram user “eonsmoke” on January 15, 2018.
110
Id.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 71. Although the official “eonsmoke” Instagram account is now deleted, on Tumblr,
17 another social media platform, an account called “Eonsmoke Vapes” contains links and images
18 of Instagram posts that appear to have been originally posted by Eonsmoke. Each linked
19 Instagram post is now-deleted. This Tumblr user holds itself out as Eonsmoke’s official page. 111
20
These posts show Eonsmoke frequently played into the idea that its product looked like a
21
flashdrive:112
22
23
111
24 The “Eonsmoke Vapes” Tumblr page uses Eonsmoke’s logo and the page’s bio says “Buy Eonsmoke e juices at
an incredibly [sic] price. Also check out our Juul compatible e-cig pods in six flavors available now! Visit
25 https”//www.enosmoke.com.” The page is available at this website: https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/.
112
Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (June 26, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/175286181941/2018-we-smoking-
26 purple-flash-drives-eonsmoke (showing purple vape; captioned by Eonsmoke as “‘2018 we smoking purple flash
drives’- @eonsmoke”); Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (Apr. 16, 2018),
https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/172997769276/red-devices-now-restocked-and-available-on (showing red vape
10
11
12
13
14
15 72. Eonsmoke has tapped into the youth social media network JUUL created by
16 marketed to users of JUUL. Eonsmoke advertised its product as JUUL compatible and used
17 hashtags to connect itself to JUUL, including “#juulcompatible” “#juulgang” “#juul”
18
“#doit4juul” and “#juulnation” among others, as shown in the Instagram post above.113
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 next to soda can with text “Smoke flashdrives all 2018); captioned by Eonsmoke as “Red devices now restocked
and available on Eonsmoke.com! Vape Eon! @eonsmoke”.
113
26 This advertising has been so pervasive that Eonsmoke has even been sued by JUUL for patent infringement. See
Verified Complaint (“Eonsmoke N.J. Compl.”), JUUL Labs, Inc. v. Eonsmoke et al., No. 19- 08405 (D.N.J. Mar.
12, 2019).
1 Similarly, in a post on the “Eonsmoke Vapes” Tumblr, Eonsmoke’s device and blueberry pods
2 are marketed as “sexy” and tagged with “#juul” “#juulgang” “#juulnation” “#doit4juul” among
3
other tags. Eonsmoke also told users to “[f]ollow” them for sales and giveaways, even though the
4
FDA has banned free samples of e-cigarette products: 114
5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 114
Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (Feb. 13, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/170841792591/so-sexy-what-do-
you-guys-think-follow (showing red vape and Eonsmoke blueberry pods, captioned by Eonsmoke “So sexy! What
21 do you guys think? Follow @eonsmoke for sales and giveaways! #juul #juulgang #juulnation #juulcentral
#doit4juul #doit4state #kangertech #kanger #aspirebreeze #aspirebreezekit #xfire #xfirevape #bovaping #bovape
22 #bovapingus #smokeshop #vapeshop #vapor #vaporshop #smoktech #sourin #sourinair #sourindrop #bouldervape
#mrsalte”); see also Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (Feb. 10, 2018),
23 https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/170724357236/we-are-doing-a-quick-weekend-juice-giveaway-of-our (showing
different flavor vape juice with text “Eonsmoke 60mg Juice Giveaway Tag a Friend Now!!”, captioned by
24 Eonsmoke“We are doing a quick weekend Juice giveaway of our made in USA 60mg salt nicotine vape juice!!!
Giveaway ends Sunday 11:59 EST February 11 th. The rules: 1. Follow @Eonsmoke 2. Tag a friend who vapes!
25 More friends you tag the better your chances of winning!!! We will give away 4 bottles of 30ml juice!!!!!!!!!!!”);
see also Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (Feb. 10, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/170725145496/you-
26 probably-know-the-rules-by-now-we-are (showing three vape devices with text “Gonna giveaway some devices
too!!!!!!! Follow @eonsmoke and tag a friend! Free devices giveaway!!!”, captioned by Eonsmoke“You probably
know the rules by now…. we are feeling pretty generous! Hope you guys win something!!!! #eonsmoke
7 targeted the youth market by selling its pods in fruity flavors and its nicotine salts in flavors such
8 as “Sour Gummy Worms,” “Gummy Bear,” “Donut Cream,” “Pineapple Crush,” “Cotton
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
#vapegiveaway #vapegiveaways #pods #podsgiveaways #vapegiveaways #vapegiveaway #podsgiveaways
21 #eonsmoke #pods”).
115
Jidong Huang et al., Vaping versus JUULing: how the extraordinary growth and marketing of JUUL
22 transformed the US retail e-cigarette market, Tob Control 2019;28:146–151. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-
054382/.
116
23 Id.
117
Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (June 12, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/174824533561/sour-gummies-
24 60mg-restocked-today-online-and (showing Sour Gummy Worm salt nicotine vape juice, captioned by
Eonsmoke“Sour Gummies 60mg restocked today online and through our vendors! Follow @Eonsmoke for more
25 stock, vape developments, and new flavors”; see also Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (July 1, 2018),
https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/175446333176/cop-one-of-our-world-class-salt-nicotine-juices-in (showing
26 Gummy Bear salt nicotine vape juice, captioned by Eonsmoke “Cop one of our world class salt nicotine juices in
60mg. #eonsmoke @eonsmoke”); see also Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (June 27, 2018),
https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/175313662276/our-salt-nic-family-of-products-try-one-today-to (showing salt
1 75. When JUUL was pressured to stop selling certain flavors in stores, Eonsmoke was
2 more than happy to fill the role. In 2018, Eonsmoke generated an estimated $5.3 million in
3
revenue.118 In 2019, after JUUL stopped selling flavors like Mango in stores, Eonsmoke’s
4
business soared, with an estimated $43.6 million in tracked sales as of mid-July 2019.119
5
76. Eonsmoke followed in JUUL’s footsteps by advertising these flavors to youth
6
7 using the apps and websites where minors often spend time, including Instagram, Tumblr,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
nicotine vape juices, captioned by Eonsmoke“Our Salt Nic family of products! Try one today to see what all the
24 hype is about. Follow @Eonsmoke”).
118
Shela Kaplan, ‘Juul-alikes’ Are Filing Shelves with Sweet, Teen-Friendly Nicotine Flavors, N.Y. Times (Aug.
25 13, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/health/juul-flavors-nicotine.html.
119
Id.
26 120
Eonsmoke Vapes, Instagram (Feb. 3, 2018), (captioned by Eonsmoke “The official vaping brand of Snapchat :)
#snapchat #eonsmoke #eonpods #juul #juulgang #phix #phixvapor”).
1 77. For example, on the social media platform Reddit, user “Eonjuulcompatiblepod”
2 holds itself out as “Eonsmoke.com Juul Compatible Pods Official Representative” and claims
3
that “Eonsmoke.com is the 2nd largest pod company in the USA and the top 5 in Salt Nictoine
4
Bottled eLiquid. Our pods are Juul compatible so you don’t have to buy another device. 7 flavors
5
including blueberry, watermelon and strawberry.”121 Eonsmoke used Reddit to try to recruit
6
7 JUUL users. For example, Eonsmoke commented that its products are not only compatible with
8 JUUL but also cheap, a crucial factor for youth who often do not have much money: “Our pods
9 are compatible with the juul device and our devices are compatible with juul pods and we just
10 lowered the retail to 20$ online after coupon.”122 In addition, when Reddit users were discussing
11
what flavors they would like to see JUUL produce and one user stated that they would like a
12
watermelon flavor, Eonsmoke responded: “We make watermelon. Step over to the dark side!”123
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
121
Eonsmoke (@Eonjuulcompatiblepod), Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/user/Eonjuulcompatiblepod (accessed 7
24
Nov, 2019).
122
25 Eonsmoke (@Eonjuulcompatiblepod), Comment to @u/981ti, Reddit (May 21, 2018, 8:43 PM),
https://www.reddit.com/r/juul/comments/8k5wfa/are_there_any_other_devices_that_fit_juul_pods/dzeu9sj/?conte
26 xt=3.
123
Eonsmoke (@Eonjuulcompatiblepod), Comment to @u/12gwar18, Reddit (May 21, 2018, 8:26 PM),
https://www.reddit.com/r/juul/comments/8kpdun/what_flavors_do_you_guys_wanna_see_next_from_juul/.
1 78. Eonsmoke’s social media posts are designed to appeal to youth. For example,
2 Eonsmoke advertises its product as an accompaniment to candy and posts images popular with
3
youth in the forms of “memes:”124
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
124
26 Eonsmoke (@eonsmoke), Instagram (May 1, 2018) (showing an Eonsmoke device next to a bag of M&M
candies and states “Can you name a better combo?”); see also Eonsmoke (@eonsmoke), Instagram (Feb. 25, 2018)
(showing a meme featuring a character from the animated show “The Simpsons”).
1 79. Eonsmoke’s social media also explicitly encouraged users to associate their
2 products with movies and toys popular with children, such as Toy Story and Monsters Inc.: 125
3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
125
Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (Mar. 19, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/172051155991/wow-i-love-this-
24 follow-eonsmoke-for-sales-and (showing Eonsmoke device with Woody from the animated film “Toy Story” and
blueberry vape pods, captioned by Eonsmoke as “Wow I love this! Follow @Eonsmoke for sales and giveaways”);
25 see also Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (Feb. 16, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/170965631311/the-cotton-
candy-60mg-eonsmoke (showing Eonsmoke devices and nicotine salt vape juice, captioned by Eonsmoek as “The
26 Cotton Candy 60mg! #eonsmoke”); see also Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (Feb. 4, 2018),
https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/170502488296/some-day-time-vibes-krissixx710 (showing Eonsmoke devices
and flavor pods, captioned by Eonsmoke as “Some Day Time Vibes @krissixx710”).
2 80. Eonsmoke also used social media and memes to highlight an “advantage” of their
3
product over JUUL’s⸺Eonsmoke sells pods in a 6% nicotine variety, more potent than the 5%
4
nicotine pods sold by JUUL.
5
81. For example, on one post, Eonsmoke advertised that its “Watermelon 6% Pods”
6
7 were “Juul compatible with more juice and more nicotine inside every pod!”126 Eonsmoke
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 126
Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (June 26, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/175281868841/try-some-
23 watermelon-6-pods-all-juul-compatible (showing watermelon vape pods and sunglasses, captioned by Eonsmoke
as “Try some Watermelon 6% Pods! All Juul compatible with more juice and more nicotine inside every pod!
24 Follow @Eonsmoke”).
127
Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (Apr. 18, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/173080730801/comment-eon-
25 below-for-a-follow-back-follow (showing person getting hit in the face with a book with text “When people say
6% nic is the same as 5% nic”, captioned by Eonsmoke as “Comment Eon below for a follow back! Follow
26 @Eonsmoke”); see also Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (May 20, 2018),
https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/174088090966/warning-pineapple-pods-contain-nicotine-and-so (showing
pineapple crush vape pods, captioned by Eonsmoke as “WARNING: PINEAPPLE PODS CONTAIN NICOTINE
1 82. At the same time, Eonsmoke attempted to play both sides of the nictoine
2 difference. While it sometimes advertised that its products contain more nictoine than JUUL, as
3
shown above, other times it fails to mention nicotine at all. The FDA sent Eonsmoke a warning
4
letter in October 2019 for, among other things, failing to include the required nictoine warning
5
statement its posts and posts it pays for by “influencers.”128
6
7 83. Like JUUL, Eonsmoke used “influencers” to advertise its products, including Mia
8 Khalifa, an Instagram influencer with 17.9 million followers who frequently posts suggestive or
9 provocative photos and has a large youth audience, Stevie Emerson, who got 6.8 million views
10 of his YouTube video titled, “Dude, Where’s my JUUL?,” and Donny Karle. Karle is better
11
known to youth by his handle “DonnySmokes.” As a 21-year-old, Karle was getting about 3
12
million views each month reviewing vaping products on YouTube, which began in 2017 when
13
he posted a “unboxing” video of his newly purchased JUUL.129 Karle’s videos were plainly
14
15 aimed at youth; one was titled, “How to HIDE & HIT Your JUUL at SCHOOL WITHOUT
16 Getting CAUGHT.”130 Eonsmoke’s CEO Michael Tolmach told Vice the company paid Karle
23
AND SO MUCH FLAVOR IT MAY CAUSE YOU TO DROP ALL OTHER TYPES OF BRANDS FOR PODS.
24 NICOTINE IS AN ADDICTIVE CHEMICAL. Follow @Eonsmoke”).
128
Supra note 20.
25 129
Allie Conti, This 21-Year-Old is Making Thousands a Month Vaping on YouTube, VICE (Feb. 5, 2018),
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8xvjmk/this-21-year-old-is-making-thousands-a-month-vaping-on-youtube.
26 130
Id.
131
Id.
1 risks of vaping—specifically that although Eonsmoke is not authorized to claim that its products
2 are safer than cigarettes, its website boasted that “Eonsmoke electronic cigarettes provide you
3
with a premium vaping experience without the thousands of harmful chemicals and additives
4
often found in tobacco cigarettes.”132
5
85. Despite increasing pressuring from state and federal agencies, Eonsmoke was
6
7 sold, and still sells, side by side with JUUL and the best-selling cigarette brand in the United
8 States, Marlboro, a product of Philip Morris and its parent company, Altria:133
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
132
25 FDA, supra note 20.
133
Eonsmoke Vapes, Tumblr (July 14, 2018), https://eonsmoke.tumblr.com/post/175887887396/this-is-how-the-top-
26 shelf-of-the-cigarette-shelf (showing Juuls being sold alongside cigarettes, captioned by Eonsmoke as “This is
how the Top shelf of the cigarette shelf looks now! Switch from cigarettes to Eon 6% pods now! #eonsmoke
#juul.”; see also Hannah Smothers, JUUL’s ‘Banned’ Flavors Are Still Absolutely Available in New York City,
8 fight against smoking. Altria estimates that the cigarette industry declined by -4% in 2017 and by
9 -4.5% in 2018. For 2019 through 2023, Altria estimated for the average annual U.S. cigarette
10 industry volume declines is -4% to -5%.134 Altria later revised this estimate in the second quarter
11
of 2019 from 4-5% to 4-6%, in light of efforts to increase the legal age for cigarette smoking to
12
21.135
13
87. In the face of these numbers, Altria turned to e-cigarettes, along with other “non-
14
combustible products,” to “enhance” its business platform.136 Altria boasted to shareholders that
15
17 88. Altria entered the e-cigarette market with a cigarette-lookalike, or “cigalike,” style
18 of e-cigarette, sold under the brand MarkTen. Following a phased roll-out of MarkTen in Indiana
19
and Arizona in late 2013, Altria launched the MarkTen nationwide in 2014 with an aggressive
20
21
VICE (Nov. 4, 2019), https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwepnj/juul-pod-banned-flavors-still-available-in-new-
22 york-city (showing JUUL products side by side with Eonsmoke products in stores in New York City in mid-
October 2019).
23 134
Altria’s Fourth-Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call, Altria (Jan. 31, 2019),
http://investor.altria.com/Cache/1001247877.PDF?O=PDF&T=&Y=&D=&FID=1001247877&iid=4087349.
24 135
Altria Shares Slide As Cigarette Sales Continue to Decline, Tobacco Bus. (July 31, 2019),
https://tobaccobusiness.com/altria-shares-slide-as-cigarette-sales-continue-to-decline/.
25 136
Altria’s Second-Quarter 2019 Earning Conference Call, Altria (July 30, 2019),
26 http://investor.altria.com/Cache/1001255076.PDF?O=PDF&T=&Y=&D=&FID=1001255076&iid=4087349.
137
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Altria (May 17, 2018),
http://investor.altria.com/Cache/1500113050.PDF?O=PDF&T=&Y=&D=&FID=1500113050&iid=4087349.
1 marketing campaign, eclipsing the advertising expenditures for Imperial Tobacco’s e-vapor
2 product, blu.138
3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
89. E-cigarette advertising spending for 2014 totaled $88.1 million, a 52 percent
18
increase from 2013.139 Of that $88.1 million spent in 2014, nearly 40% of that was Altria’s
19
MarkTen campaign, at $35 million.140 More than 18 million middle school and high school
20
children were exposed to e-cigarette advertisements in 2014.141 Approximately 1 in 2 middle
21
22
23 138
Jennifer Cantrell et al., Rapid increase in e-cigarette advertising spending as Altria’s MarkTen enters the
marketplace, Tobacco Control 25 (10) (2015), 1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052532.
24 139
Id.
140
25 Id.
141
Carley Thompson, How JUUL cornered the youth tobacco market and what you should know, King County Pub.
26 Health Insider (Aug. 6, 2018),
https://web.archive.org/web/20190329100340/https://publichealthinsider.com/2018/08/06/how-juul-cornered-the-
youth-tobacco-market-and-what-you-should-know/ (last visited Nov. 7, 2019).
1 school and high school age children saw advertisements for e-cigarettes in retail stores and
2 almost 2 in 5 saw advertisements for e-cigarettes online.142
3
90. Altria’s MarkTen advertising tag line, “Let It Glow,” was criticized by public
4
health advocates for playing off Disney’s popular children’s movie “Frozen” and its hit song
5
“Let It Go.”143
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 91. Even the then-president of R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, Stephanie Cordisco,
23
criticized Altria for irresponsible marketing, calling this tag line “terrible” and saying that the
24
25
142
Id.
26 143
Matt Richtel, A Bolder Effort by Big Tobacco on E-Cigarettes, N.Y. Times (June 17, 2014),
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/17/business/a-bolder-effort-by-big-tobacco-on-e-cigarettes.html.
1 companies “running the most irresponsible campaigns are the ones who know better.”144 At the
2 time, the president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids said that companies like Altria were
3
using “exactly the same themes we saw work with kids in the U.S. for decades with
4
cigarettes.”145
5
10
11
12
13
14
15 92. Although free samples of tobacco products are prohibited under the terms of the
16
Tobacco MSA as well as FDA regulations issued in 2010, Altria took advantage of the grey area
17
in the regulation of e-cigarettes and distributed coupons for free sample nicotine cartridges as
18
part of its MarkTen launch. (The FDA has since issued finalized guidance clarifying the scope of
19
21
22
23
24
25
26 144
Id.
145
Id.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
93. Altria also took full advantage of its distribution network, reaching 60,000 stores
22
in a month.146 In Arizona, for example, Altria’s distribution network allowed MarkTen to
23
achieve a 48% e-cigarette market share in just seven weeks after launch, according to then-CEO
24
25
26 146
Melissa Kress, MarkTen National Rollout Hits 60,000 Stores, Convenience Store News (July 22, 2014),
https://csnews.com/markten-national-rollout-hits-60000-stores.
1 Marty Barrington’s statements on an earnings call.147 Altria was clear in its intent to dominate
2 the e-cigarette market as it has the traditional cigarette one: “We are the market leader today and
3
we will continue to be,” Barrington told investors.148
4
94. Altria began acquiring small companies in the vaping industry, starting in 2014
5
with Green Smoke, Inc., whose e-cigarettes were also the “cigalike” style.149 In 2016, Altria
6
7 acquired a vape product called Cync, from Vape Forward.150 Cync is a small vapor device that
8 uses prefilled pods, similar to JUUL. It also made a minority investment in Avail Vapor, one of
9 the largest vape store chains in the U.S., which also produces and sells its own branded e-liquids
10 for so-called open-system devices, which are refillable.151
11
95. In February 2018, with JUUL dominating the e-cigarette market, Altria
12
announced the national launch of a pod-based, “closed-tank” e-cigarette like the JUUL, which it
13
branded as the MarkTen Elite: “a pod-based product with a premium, sleek battery design” and
14
15 having the “convenience of prefilled, magnetic click pods.” Altria had initially brought the Elite
16 to market in 2016, telling investors that the product “offers a variety of flavorful liquids in a
17 modern, discrete device format.”152 The product was sold in flavors such as Hazelnut Cream,
18
Apple Cider, and Strawberry Brulee.153 At an analyst conference in February 2018, former Altria
19
20
21
147
Id.
22 148
Id.
149
Mike Esterl, Altria To Launch MarkTen E-Cigarette Nationally, Wall St. J. (Feb. 19, 2014),
23 https://www.wsj.com/articles/altria-to-launch-markten-e-cigarette-nationally-1392832378.
150
Remarks by Jody Begley, 2017 Altria Investor Day (Nov. 2, 2017), http://media.corporate-
24 ir.net/media_files/IROL/80/80855/2017InvestorDay/Remarks_and_Reconciliations.pdf.
151
Timothy S. Donahue, At the Forefront, Tobacco Rep. (Dec. 1, 2017),
25 https://www.tobaccoreporter.com/2017/12/at-the-forefront/.
152
Supra note 156 at 18.
26 153
Angel Abcede, Altria Introducing Closed Vapor System, CSP Daily News (Feb. 27, 2018),
https://www.cspdailynews.com/tobacco/altria-introducing-closed-vapor-system#page=0.
1 Chief Executive Officer, Marty Barrington, boasted that the Elite’s pods held more than twice as
2 much liquid as JUUL’s.154
3
9
96. Altria quickly followed with another pod-based product, the Apex by MarkTen.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 97. Because e-cigarettes are subject to more relaxed regulation than cigarettes, Altria
17 was able to market its products in ways it could not have done for traditional tobacco products.
18
Altria marketed its e-cigarettes in flavors that would appeal to youth: Strawberry Brulee, Apple
19
Cider, Hazelnut Cream, Spiced Fruit, Piña Colada, Glacier Mint, and Mardi Gras (apparently a
20
mixed berry flavor). Most of these flavors were marketed with the Elite and Apex products,
21
23 98. Altria’s push to gain the youth market gained the attention of the FDA. On
24 September 12, 2018, the FDA sent a warning letter to Altria, requesting that Altria respond with
25
26 154
Altria Group, Inc., Current Report (Form 8-K), Ex. 99.2 (Feb. 21, 2018) (remarks by Barrington and other
members of Altria’s senior management team).
1 a “detailed plan” to address and mitigate the widespread use of its e-cigarette products by
2 minors.155 Due to the “epidemic rate of increase in youth use” of e-cigarettes, the FDA had
3
recently conducted an “enforcement blitz” of retailers nationwide and confirmed that Altria’s
4
MarkTen products were being sold to minors. The FDA did not mince words, telling Altria that
5
“[t]his is unacceptable, both legally and as a matter of public health.” The FDA warned Altria
6
7 that it has a responsibility to ensure minors are not getting access to its products and that it was
8 “crucial” that manufacturers like Altria take steps to prevent youth from using its products. First
9 and foremost, the FDA asked Altria to “take prompt action to address the rate of youth use of
10 MarkTen products.” The FDA suggested that Altria could revise its current marketing practices,
11
eliminate online sales, and remove flavored products from the market. The FDA’s expectation
12
and motivation was clear: “steps must be taken to protect the nation’s young people.”
13
99. On October 25, 2018, Altria responded to the FDA, claiming to have “serious
14
15 concerns” about youth access to e-vapor products.156 It admitted that the use of e-cigarettes by
16 youth had risen to “epidemic levels.” In response, Altria agreed to remove its pod-based e-
17 cigarettes from the market and stop selling any flavored traditional e-cigarettes other than
18
tobacco, menthol, and mint. It acknowledged that “[b]ased on publicly-available information
19
from FDA and others, we believe pod-based products significantly contribute to the rise in youth
20
use of e-vapor products. We don’t believe our products are the issue, but we don’t want to risk
21
contributing to the problem.” Altria’s letter went on to disclaim a number of practices that it
22
23 associated with marketing to youth—strategies that were key components of JUUL’s marketing
24
155
25 Scott Gottlieb, Letter to Altria Client Services, U.S. Food & Drug Admin. (Sept. 12, 2018),
https://www.fda.gov/media/119666/download.
156
26 Howard A. Willard, Letter to Scott Gottlieb, Commissioner, Altria (Oct. 25, 2018),
http://www.altria.com/About-Altria/Federal-Regulation-of-Tobacco/Regulatory-Filing/FDAFilings/Altria-
Response-to-FDA-E-vapor-October-25-2018.pdf.
1 strategy. Altria specifically identified the use of flavors that go beyond traditional tobacco
2 flavors, digitally advertising on websites with a large percentage of youth visitors, using social
3
media to promote the brand, allowing online purchases and promotional sign-ups without age
4
verification, advertising e-cigarettes on billboards, advertising with models who appear to be
5
under 25 years old, distributing branded merchandise, and paying celebrities or other third
6
7 parties to market or use a particular brand’s e-cigarette. Altria also claimed to support “banning
8 vaping in schools” in order to reduce “social access.” Altria ended the letter by committing to
16 States senators wrote JUUL’s CEO, Kevin Burns, a letter in April 2018, declaring that the JUUL
17 device and JUULpods “are undermining our nation’s efforts to reduce tobacco use among youth
18 and putting an entire new generation of children at risk of nicotine addiction and other health
19
consequences.”158 Less than a week later, then FDA Commissioner Gottlieb announced a
20
crackdown on retailers to limit youth access to e-cigarettes and enforcement actions against
21
JUUL in particular.159 At the same time, the FDA sent JUUL a request for documents relating to
22
23
157
Cromwell Schubarth, Vaping Unicorn Juul Opens Lab in Mountain View Amid Furor in S.F., Silicon Valley
24
Bus. J. (Feb. 5, 2019), https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2019/02/05/juul-opens-lab-in-mountain-
view.html.
25 158
Richard Durbin et al., Letter from 11 U.S. Senators, to Kevin Burns, CEO of JUUL Labs, Inc., U.S. Senate (Apr.
26 18, 2018), https://www.durbin.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/JUUL%20Letter%20-%20S%20IGNED.pdf.
159
Scott Gottlieb, Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., on new enforcement actions and a
Youth Tobacco Prevention Plan to stop youth use of, and access to, JUUL and other e-cigarettes, U.S. Food &
1 marketing, product design, and public health impact.160 In July 2018, Massachusetts Attorney
2 General Maura Healey announced an investigation into JUUL regarding marketing and sale to
3
minors.161 In September 2018, FDA Commissioner Gottlieb called youth vaping an “epidemic”
4
and sent letters to JUUL, Altria, and other e-cigarette manufacturers demanding a plan to reduce
5
youth use.162 Then, in October 2018, as alleged above, the FDA raided JUUL’s headquarters and
6
7 seized more than a thousand documents relating to JUUL’s sales and marketing practices.163
8 102. On November 13, 2018, JUUL responded with an “Action Plan,” declaring its
9 intent to stop selling certain flavors in brick-and-mortar stores, restrict purchases of those flavors
10 on the JUUL website to adults age 21 and over, and shut down its social media accounts.164
11
103. As the pressure on JUUL intensified, Altria stepped in to assist. Despite the clear
12
criticism of JUUL’s conduct in its October 25th letter to the FDA, Altria announced its $12.8
13
billion investment in JUUL on December 20, 2018.165 Altria characterized its investment as one
14
15 intended to “accelerate harm reduction and drive growth.”166 In an investor presentation in 2019,
16
17
1 Altria described JUUL as having a “unique and compelling product” and included the following
2 graphic:167
3
10
11
12 104. But as the president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids observed upon
13 announcement of the deal, “Altria has no interest in seriously reducing the number of people who
14 smoke cigarettes.”168
15 105. Altria would not have made such an investment if it did not intend to grow
16
JUUL’s already enormous market even more. In fact, Altria said as much when announcing its
17
investment, explaining that its investment in JUUL “enhances future growth prospects” and
18
committing to applying “its logistics and distribution experience to help JUUL expand its reach
19
20 and efficiency.”169 Since the deal was inked in December 2018, Altria’s actions have clearly
21 helped JUUL maintain, if not expand, its market share—a market share that, based on Altria’s
22 own October 25, 2018 letter to the FDA, it believes was gained by employing marketing and
23
24
167
Howard Willard, 2019 CAGNY Investor Presentation, Altria (2019),
25 http://investor.altria.com/Cache/1500117496.PDF?O=PDF&T=&Y=&D=&FID=1500117496&iid=4087349.
168
Sheila Kaplan & Matt Richtel, Juul Closes Deal with Tobacco Giant Altria, N.Y. Times (Dec. 20, 2018),
26
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/20/health/juul-reaches-deal-with-tobacco-giant-altria.html.
169
Altria Minority Investment, supra note 171.
1 advertising practices that contributed to youth vaping. Altria’s Second Quarter 2019 Earnings
2 Call reported that JUUL continued to grow in the first half of 2019, from a 33% category share
3
in 2018 to 48% by the second quarter 2019. JUUL’s expected revenue for 2019 is $3.4 billion,
4
nearly triple what it was in 2018.170
5
106. From JUUL’s beginnings, Altria had “followed Juul’s journey rather closely.”171
6
7 Altria Chairman and CEO Howard Willard said that, for years, his company “watched Juul
8 carefully to see if it had staying power.”172 Altria decided it did. As Willard explained: “During
9 2018, we concluded that JUUL had not only become the retail share leader in the U.S. e-vapor
10 category, but that no other brand was close to it in share or future growth potential.”173 This was
11
enough for Altria, one of the world’s largest producers and marketers of tobacco products, to call
12
JUUL’s alleged smoking cessation device a “terrific product” and take a 35% stake in JUUL
13
with its $12.8 billion investment.174 With this investment, Altria now owns both the number one
14
15 youth initiation cigarette in the United States (the Marlboro cigarette) and the number one youth
17 107. Notwithstanding Altria’s statements to the FDA just two months previously about
18
its concerns that JUUL was marketing and advertising its products in a way that contributed to
19
the youth vaping epidemic, Willard stated that the deal would allow Altria to “work[] with JUUL
20
21
22
170
Olivia Zaleski & Ellen Huet, Juul Expects Skyrocketing Sales of $3.4 Billion, Despite Flavored Vape
23 Restrictions, Bloomberg (Feb. 22, 2019), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-22/juul-expects-
skyrocketing-sales-of-3-4-billion-despite-flavored-vape-ban.
24 171
Altria Group, Inc., Current Report (Form 8-K) at 4, Ex. 99.1 (Feb. 20, 2019),
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/764180/000076418019000018/exhibit991-2019cagnyremarks.htm.
25 172
Id. at 4.
173
Id. at 4.
26 174
Angelica LaVito, E-Cigarette Sales Are Booming Thanks to Juul, CNBC (Aug. 21, 2018),
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/21/e-cigarette-sales-are-booming-thanks-to-juul.html.
1 to accelerate its mission.”175 Altria committed to applying “its logistics and distribution
2 experience to help JUUL expand its reach and efficiency” and offering JUUL the support of
3
“Altria’s sales organization, which covers approximately 230,000 retail locations.” It also gave
4
JUUL access to its “premier” retail shelf space while allowing it to continue to sell its flavored
5
products online and provided JUUL with access to the databases of all of Altria’s companies.
6
7 According to Willard, Altria was “excited to support JUUL’s highly-talented team and offer
8 [Altria’s] best-in-class services to build on their tremendous success.” Altria admitted that
9 minors were using JUUL products and that “underage use of e-cigarette product is a problem.”
10 Nevertheless, that it believed its investment in JUUL “strengthens its financial profile and
11
enhances future growth prospects.”
12
108. Altria’s decision to prioritize profits over the dangers of youth vaping did not go
13
unnoticed. On February 6, 2019, former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, sent Altria another
14
15 letter “regarding representations” made by Altria acknowledging that it “has an obligation to take
16 action to help address the mounting epidemic of youth addiction to tobacco products.”176
17 Commissioner Gottlieb told Altria that its recent purchase of a 35% ownership of JUUL
18
“contradict[s] the commitments you made to the FDA.” The FDA demanded Altria be prepared
19
to explain itself regarding its “plans to stop marketing e-cigarettes and to address the crisis of
20
youth use of e-cigarettes.” Commissioner Gottlieb told Altria that “deeply concerning data”
21
shows that “youth use of JUUL represents a significant proportion of overall use of e-cigarette
22
23 products by children” and despite any steps the companies had taken to address the issue he
24
25
175
Altria Minority Investment, supra note 171.
26 176
Scott Gottlieb, Letter to Howard Willard, U.S. Food & Drug Admin. (Feb. 6, 2019),
https://www.fda.gov/media/122589/download.
1 “ha[d] no reason to believe these youth patterns of use are abating in the near term, and they
2 certainly do not appear to be reversing.”
3
109. The companies met with Gottlieb in March 2019 in a meeting the Commissioner
4
described as “difficult.”177 Gottlieb “did not come away with any evidence that public health
5
concerns drove Altria’s decision to invest in JUUL, and instead sa[id] it looks like a business
6
9 contribution. Altria is working to actively help run JUUL’s operations and expand JUUL’s sales.
10 Altria’s investment brings legal and regulatory benefits to JUUL, by helping with patent
11
infringement battles and consumer health claims and helping to navigate the regulatory waters
12
and FDA pressure. In fact, Joe Murillo, who headed regulatory affairs for Altria, is now JUUL’s
13
chief regulatory officer.178 A 24-year career Altria executive, Murillo previously ran Altria’s e-
14
15 cigarette business, Nu Mark, “before Altria pulled its e-cigarettes off the market as part of its
17 111. Altria also brings lobbying muscle. Altria “has a potent lobbying network in
18
Washington and around the country.”180 While an Altria spokesman has denied that there was
19
any contractual services agreement for lobbying between JUUL and Altria, he admitted that he
20
21
22 177
Kate Rooney & Angelica LaVito, Altria shares fall after FDA’s Gottlieb describes ‘difficult’ meeting on Juul,
CNBC (Mar. 19, 2019), https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/19/altria-shares-fall-after-fdas-gottlieb-describes-difficult-
23 meeting-on-juul.html.
178
Jennifer Maloney, Juul Hires Another Top Altria Executive, Wall St. J. (Oct. 1, 2019),
24
https://web.archive.org/web/20191009170129/https://www.wsj.com/articles/juul-hires-another-top-altria-
executive-11569971306 (last visited Nov. 7, 2019).
25 179
Id.
180
26 Shelia Kaplan, In Washington, Juul Vows to Curb Youth Vaping. Its Lobbying in States Runs Counter to That
Pledge., N.Y. Times (Apr. 28, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/28/health/juul-lobbying-states-
ecigarettes.html.
1 did not know what informal advice and conversations Altria has had with JUUL about lobbying
2 and efforts. Vince Willmore, a spokesman for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, which has
3
been involved in many state lobbying battles, said, “It’s hard to say where Altria ends and Juul
4
begins.”181 Since JUUL and Altria joined forces, JUUL’s spending on lobbying has risen
5
significantly. JUUL spent $1.95 million on lobbying in the first two quarters of 2019, compared
6
8 112. In addition, Altria’s arrangement with JUUL gives JUUL greater access to retail.
9 JUUL has been in 90,000 US retail outlets, while Altria reaches 230,000 US outlets. Altria
10 brings its logistic and distribution experience. Importantly, Altria gives JUUL access to shelf
11
space—and not just shelf space, but space near Altria products and retail displays. The
12
arrangement allows JUUL’s tobacco and menthol-based products to receive prominent
13
placement alongside a top-rated brand of combustible cigarettes.
14
15 113. Altria is closely intertwined with JUUL. Not only does Altria’s investment also
16 allow it to appoint a third of JUUL’s board, but last month, JUUL’s CEO resigned to be replaced
17 by another career Altria executive, K.C. Crosthwaite. Crosthwaite had most recently served as
18
the vice president and chief growth officer of Altria Client Services LLC, overseeing the
19
company’s work, including digital marketing, packaging design & innovation, product
20
development, and safety, health, and environmental affairs. Crosthwaite is a career Altria
21
executive who knows Big Tobacco’s playbook all too well, having previously serving as the
22
23 president and CEO of Phillip Morris USA, the vice president and general manager at Marlboro,
24 and the vice president of strategy and business development of at Altria Client Services LLC.
25
181
Id.
26 182
Alex Gangitano, Embattled Juul seeks allies in Washington, The Hill (Aug. 7, 2019),
https://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/business-a-lobbying/456449-embattled-juul-seeks-allies-in-washington.
1 114. This arrangement was profitable for both companies. JUUL employees received
2 $2 billion in bonuses, which, split among the Company’s 1,500 employees, was approximately
3
$1.3 million per employee,183 and Altria received millions of teen customers.
4
115. JUUL claims its mission is to “improve the lives of the world’s one billion adult
5
smokers by eliminating cigarettes” and its advertising now encourages “making the switch.”184
6
7 116. In March 2019, JUUL’s CEO Ken Burns wrote an op-ed piece declaring his
8 agreement with HHS Secretary Azar and FDA Commissioner Gottlieb “that companies such as
9 ours must step up with meaningful measures to limit access and appeal of vapor products to
10 young people. And that’s exactly what we’ve done, and we will do more to combat teen use in
11
order to save the harm-reduction opportunity for the 34 million adult smokers in the United
12
States.”185
13
117. In September 2019, JUUL spokesperson Ted Kwong said the company agreed
14
15 with the need for “aggressive category-wide action on vapor products,” adding that it had taken
16 “the most aggressive actions of anyone in the industry to combat youth usage.”186
17 118. Similarly, Altria’s CEO Howard Willard claimed that it invested in JUUL to help
18
“switching adult smokers” and “reduce harm.”187 But JUUL does not have FDA approval as a
19
cessation device. This may be because, as one Company engineer said: “We don’t think a lot
20
21
22
183
Olivia Zaleski, Juul Employees to Get $2 Billion Bonus in Altria Deal, Bloomberg (Dec. 20, 2018),
23 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-20/juul-employees-said-to-get-2-billion-bonus-in-altria-deal.
184
Our Mission, JUUL Labs (2019), https://www.juul.com/mission-values.
24 185
Kevin Burns, Vape makers must do more to stop kids from using e-cigarettes, Wash. Post (Mar. 30, 2019),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/30/vape-makers-must-do-more-stop-kids-using-e-cigarettes/.
25 186
Steve Gorman, California governor acts to stem ‘epidemic’ of youth vaping, Reuters (Sept. 16, 2019),
26 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-vaping-california/california-governor-acts-to-stem-epidemic-of-youth-
vaping-idUSKBN1W12DD.
187
See Altria Minority Investment, supra note 171.
1 about addiction here because we’re not trying to design a cessation product at all … anything
2 about health is not on our mind.”188
3
119. JUUL also does not have authority to claim that is product is healthier than
4
cigarettes. On September 9, 2019, the FDA warned JUUL that it has violated federal law by
5
making unauthorized representations that JUUL products are safer than cigarettes.189
6
7 120. Moreover, even if JUUL were to obtain FDA approval as a legitimate smoking
8 cessation device, this has no impact—and certainly does not excuse—the Defendants’ conduct
9 that targets youth. Regardless of the potential health benefits to chain smokers from switching to
10 vaping from smoking, there is no benefit to kids from starting to vape.
11
G. The Cost of JUUL’s Success
12
121. In addition to designing its devices to be particularly attractive to youth, JUUL
13
designed its devices to be highly addictive. Unlike most other e-cigarettes, which use freebase
14
nicotine, JUUL uses patented nicotine salts from which it makes liquid nicotine cartridges, or
15
16 JUULpods.190 Each JUULpod is, according to the Company, the equivalent of a pack of
17 cigarettes. Each pod contains an alarming amount of nicotine, with up to 59 mg per ml—an
18 amount that is roughly three times the amount of nicotine that can be sold to consumers in the
19
European Union in a JUULpod. On top of ramping up the amount of nicotine, JUULpods
20
enabled the Company to increase the rate and amount of nicotine delivery to the JUUL user,
21
roughly doubling the concentration and tripling the delivery speed of nicotine of the average e-
22
23
188
Nitasha Tiku, Startup Behind the Lambo of Vaporizers Just Launched an Intelligent e-Cigarette, The Verge
24
(Apr. 21, 2015), https://www.theverge.com/2015/4/21/8458629/pax-labs-e-cigarette-juul.
189
25 Juul Labs, Inc. Warning Letter, U.S. Food & Drug Admin. (Sept. 9, 2019), https://www.fda.gov/inspections-
compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/juul-labs-inc-590950-09092019.
190
26 Rachel Becker, Juul’s Nicotine Salts Are Dominating the Market – And Other Companies Want In, The Verge
(Nov. 21, 2018), https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/21/18105969/juul-vaping-nicotine-salts-electronic-
cigarettes-myblu-vuse-markten.
1 cigarette.191 Eonsmoke has followed this same playbook, advertising “[e]ach flavored cartridge is
2 the equivalent of up to a pack of traditional cigarettes.”192 But Eonsmoke’s products claim to
3
contain even more nicotine than JUULs. For example, EonSmoke sells its 4x Pods in “Blue
4
Raspberry Flavor JUUL Compatible 6.8% Salt Nic Pods.”193
5
122. Big Tobacco spent decades manipulating nicotine in order to foster and maintain
6
7 addiction in their customers. RJR developed and patented nicotine salt additives, including
8 nicotine benzoate, to increase nicotine delivery in cigarette smoke. The objective was to provide
9 an additional “nicotine kick” based on increased nicotine absorption associated with lower pH.
10 JUUL uses this very same concept for its market-dominating e-cigarettes. The Company’s patent
11
for its nicotine salts describes a process for combining benzoic acids with nicotine, a formulation
12
that mimics the nicotine salt additive developed by RJR. JUUL’s use of benzoic acid and
13
manipulation of pH affect the palatability of nicotine inhalation by reducing the “throat hit” that
14
15 users experience when vaping. Indeed, this was the objective behind using nicotine salts (as
16 compared to “free base nicotine” which has a higher pH). According to Ari Atkins, one of the
17 inventors of the JUUL device, “[i]n the tobacco plant, there are these organic acids that naturally
18
occur. And they help stabilize the nicotine in such a way that makes it . . . I’ve got to choose my
19
words carefully here: Appropriate for inhalation.”194
20
21
191
How Much Nicotine is In Juul?, Truth Initiative (Feb. 26, 2019), https://truthinitiative.org/research-
22 resources/emerging-tobacco-products/how-much-nicotine-juul.
192
23 Eonsmoke About Us, eonsmoke.com,
https://web.archive.org/web/20191009033001/https://www.eonsmoke.com/about-us/ (last visited Nov. 7, 2019).
193
24 Eonsmoke Product, eonsmoke.com,
https://web.archive.org/web/20191009085755/https://www.eonsmoke.com/product/4x-blue-raspberry-flavor-juul-
25 compatible-6-8-salt-nic-pods/ (last visited Nov. 7, 2019) (“Flavor profile: Your favorite snack and ejuice flavor
now in pod form. Both sweet and sour at the same time, makes sour gummy one of the fan favorites. Blue
26 Raspberry 4x pods just hit that sweet spot of flavor.”).
194
David Pierce, This Might Just Be the First Great E-Cig, Wired.com (Apr. 21, 2015),
https://www.wired.com/2015/04/pax-juul-ecig/.
1 123. Because smokers are already accustomed to a certain level of harshness and throat
2 hit, developing a product with low levels of harshness and minimal “throat hit” is only a critical
3
concern if your goal is to appeal to non-smokers, for example, youth. Minimizing the harshness
4
of nicotine also allows one to vape more frequently and for longer periods of time and masks the
5
amount of nicotine being delivered by eliminating the unpleasant throat hit normally associated
6
7 with large doses of nicotine. The harshness of free base nicotine makes prolonged vaping
8 difficult; the use of nicotine salts solves that problem. Put another way, the nicotine salt
9 technology behind JUULpods makes JUUL “smoke” highly potent yet hardly perceptible.
10 124. Eonsmoke has honed in on this distinction. For example, in a comment on social
11
media platform Reddit, Eonsmoke advertised that compared to JUUL, “[o]ur throat hit is
12
smoother, buzz is the same.” Eonsmoke also advertised their new “disposable pod system which
13
is 1.3ml and 7% salt nic for 8$ you get the battery plus one large pod that lasts like 2 juul
14
15 pods.”195
16 125. The increased nicotine exposure facilitated by the JUUL device and its tag-along,
17 Eonsmoke, has serious health consequences. The ease of use and “smoothness” strip away
18
external inhibitors and enable extreme levels of unfettered use. Using the JUUL’s own
19
calculations, consuming two JUULpods in a day is the equivalent of consuming two to four
20
packs of cigarettes a day. In this way, JUUL has not only created a new generation of e-cigarette
21
smokers, but has also pioneered a new style of smoking—vaping—that is more nicotine-
22
24
25
26 195
Comment on Reddit by user “Eonjuulcompatiblepod” on Oct. 23, 2018 3:40 PM,
https://www.reddit.com/r/juul/comments/9qrxxr/3rd_party_pods/e8bqkbb/?context=3.
1 126. Increased rates and duration of smoking lead to greater overall exposure to
2 nicotine. Nicotine is a neurotoxin. A highly addictive, psychoactive substance that targets brain
3
areas involved in emotional and cognitive processing, nicotine poses a particularly potent threat
4
to the adolescent brain, as it can “derange the normal course of brain maturation and have lasting
5
consequences for cognitive ability, mental health, and even personality.”196 Animal researchers
6
7 from the Yale University School of Medicine has found that vaping during adolescence can lead
9 127. Studies also show that exposure to nicotine as a teen—even minimal exposure—
10 biologically primes the brain for addiction and greatly increases likelihood of dependence on
11
nicotine as well as other substances later in life.198 In a study done on mice, even “very brief,
12
low-dose exposure to nicotine in early adolescence increases the rewarding properties of other
13
drugs, including alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine—and these are long-term changes.”199
14
15 128. JUUL and Eonsmoke’s use of flavors only amplifies their addictive qualities.
16 Research done by Nii Addy, associate professor of psychiatry and cellular and molecular
17 physiology at the Yale School of Medicine, found that “sweet flavors can make the nicotine
18
more palatable . . . but also act in the brain to increase nicotine taking.”200 This effective is
19
especially troubling for teenage brains, which are more sensitive than adult brains to rewards.
20
21
22 196
N.A. Goriounova & H.D. Mansvelder, Short- and Long-Term Consequences of Nicotine Exposure during
Adolescence for Prefrontal Cortex Neuronal Network Function, Cold Spring Harbor Persp. in Med. 2(12) (Dec.
23 2012), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543069/.
197
Jon Hamilton, How Vaping Nicotine Can Affect A Teenage Brain, NPR (Oct. 10, 2019),
24 https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/10/10/768588170/how-vaping-nicotine-can-affect-a-teenage-brain.
198
Principles of Adolescent Substance Use Disorder: A Research Based Guide, Nat’l Inst. on Drug Abuse (2014),
25 https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-adolescent-substance-use-disorder-treatment-research-
based-guide/introduction.
26 199
Hamilton, supra note 204.
200
Id.
7 Research and Treatment Center, “[n]icotine addiction can take hold in only a few days,
9 nicotine. . . Many of my patients find Juul nearly impossible to stop. Nicotine withdrawal can
10 cause headaches, insomnia, irritability, anxiety, and depression, and these withdrawal symptoms
11
are one of the primary reasons a nicotine addiction is difficult to overcome.”202 Moreover, there
12
is a lack of effective tools to help adolescents overcome nicotine addiction: there is no good data
13
on how to treat adolescents with e-cigarette dependence; there has not been enough research on
14
15 youth tobacco cessation strategies; and most of the pharmacological therapies approved for
17 130. Research in Massachusetts indicates that daily JUUL and other e-cigarette use is
18
much more likely to continue than daily cigarette smoking. Out of the surveyed students who
19
reported ever using cigarettes, only 17% indicated that they remained daily smokers. Out of the
20
surveyed students who reported ever using e-cigarettes daily, 58% remained daily users. This
21
22
23
201
Id.
24 202
Jonathan Winickoff, Testimony of Jonathan Winickoff before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on
25 Oversight and Reform Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy (“Winickoff Testimony”) at 2, U.S.
House Committee on Oversight & Reform (July 24, 2019),
26 https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/2019.07.24%20
Winickoff%20AAP%20Testimony.pdf.
203
Id. at 2.
1 data demonstrates both that e-cigarette use in teens is very persistent, a result consistent with the
2 addictiveness of JUUL and the difficulty teens have in trying to quit.204
3
131. E-cigarette use also puts adolescents at increased risk for cigarette smoking.
4
Compared to adolescents who do not use e-cigarettes, those who do are 3.5 times more likely to
5
begin smoking cigarettes.
6
7 132. The dangerous and destructive nature of nicotine is no recent discovery. As a key
8 ingredient in tobacco products, the drug and its deleterious effects have been the subject of
9 scientific research and public health warnings for decades. Nicotine causes cardiovascular,
10 reproductive, and immunosuppressive problems with devastating effects. Part of the reason the
11
national decline in cigarette use in recent years was such a victory for public health was because
12
there was a corresponding decline in teen exposure to nicotine. From 2000 to 2017, the smoking
13
rate among high school students fell by 73%.205
14
15 133. That trend has completely reversed. In 2018, more than one in four high school
16 students in the United States reported using a tobacco product in the past thirty days, a dramatic
17 increase from just one year before.206 But there was no increase in the use of cigarettes, cigars, or
18
hookahs during that same time period.207 There was only increased use in a single tobacco
19
product: e-cigarettes. While use of all other tobacco products continued to decrease as it had
20
21
22
23 204
Id. at 2.
205
Matthew L. Myers, Press Release: On 20th Anniversary of State Tobacco Settlement (the MSA), It’s Time for
24
Bold Action to Finish the Fight Against Tobacco, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (Nov. 26, 2018),
https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/press-releases/2018_11_26_msa20.
25 206
Progress Erased: Youth Tobacco Use Increased During 2017-2018, Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention (Feb.
26 11, 2019), https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2019/p0211-youth-tobacco-use-increased.html.
207
Tobacco Use By Youth Is Rising: E-Cigarettes are the Main Reason, Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention
(Feb. 2019), https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/youth-tobacco-use/index.html.
1 been for decades, e-cigarette use increased 78% in just one year.208 This drastic reversal caused
2 the CDC to describe youth vaping an “epidemic.”209
3
10
11
12
13
14
15
134. The teen vaping epidemic of which JUUL is the architect and Eonsmoke has
16
furthered has and will continue to have significant costs, both for individual users and for
17
society. Nicotine addiction alone has significant health care costs, and these costs are
18
19 exacerbated when adolescents are involved. Adolescent nicotine addiction leads to memory and
20 attention problems, and increase chances of addiction later in life, all of which will continue to
23
24
208
25 Scott Gottlieb, Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., on proposed new steps to protect youth
by preventing access to flavored tobacco products and banning menthol in cigarettes, U.S. Food & Drug Admin.
26 (Nov. 15, 2018), https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-fda-commissioner-scott-
gottlieb-md-proposed-new-steps-protect-youth-preventing-access.
209
Adams, supra note 2.
1 135. Science is also beginning to show that e-cigarettes have the potential to cause
2 even more, distinct health risks and costs. The very same liquids that enable e-cigarettes to
3
deliver nicotine with such potency are proving to be increasingly dangerous. When heated, the
4
vape liquid turns into aerosol, which may contain, in addition to nicotine, ultrafine toxic particles
5
such as lead, additional chemicals, and volatile organic compounds.210 These chemicals have the
6
7 potential to be deadly. Vaping is now linked to conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary
8 disease and seizures, and there were 193 possible cases of severe lung illness associated with e-
9 cigarette product use in 22 states in less than two months in the summer of 2019 alone.211 Public
10 health officials reported the first known death from a vaping-related illness on August 23,
11
2019.212 On September 11, 2019, a teenager became the first person in Washington State to be
12
diagnosed with a severe lung disease associated with vaping.213 By October 10, 2019, lung
13
illness tied to vaping had killed 26 people, and there were over 1,300 possible cases of serious
14
15 illness reported from 49 states.214 Only Alaska has not yet seen a case. 16% of these patients have
16
17
18
19
20 210
Lena H. Sun, He went from hiking enthusiast to ‘on death’s door’ within days. Doctors blamed vaping, Wash.
Post (Aug. 24, 2019), https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/one-mans-near-death-experience-with-vaping-
21 related-lung-failure/2019/08/24/ca8ce42c-c5b4-11e9-9986-1fb3e4397be4_story.html?arc404=true.
211
CDC, FDA, States Continue to Investigate Severe Pulmonary Disease Among People Who Use E-cigarettes,
22 Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention (Aug. 21, 2019), https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2019/s0821-cdc-fda-
states-e-cigarettes.html.
23 212
Matt Richtel & Sheila Kaplan, First Death in a Spate of Vaping Sicknesses Reported by Health Officials, N.Y.
Times (Aug. 23, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/23/health/vaping-death-cdc.html.
24 213
Nicole Brodeur & Ryan Blethen, King County teen is first in state diagnosed with severe lung disease related to
25 vaping, Seattle Times (Sept. 11, 2019), https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/king-county-teen-is-
first-in-state-diagnosed-with-severe-lung-disease-related-to-vaping/.
214
26 Nicole Brodeur & Ryan Blethen, King County teen is first in state diagnosed with severe lung disease related to
vaping, Seattle Times (Sept. 11, 2019), https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/king-county-teen-is-
first-in-state-diagnosed-with-severe-lung-disease-related-to-vaping/.
1 been under the age of 18.215 In October 2019, a 17-year-old boy from the Bronx, New York
2 became the first child to die from vaping-related respiratory illness.216
3
136. Many teenagers are simply unaware of these risks, an ignorance that JUUL preys
4
on. According to Dr. Winickoff, many of his patients believe JUULing is harmless:
5
Counseling teens and preteens on e-cigarette use is challenging. Many of my
6 patients have wildly incorrect beliefs about e-cigarettes. They know that cigarettes
7 are dangerous, but assume that Juul—since it’s ubiquitous, comes in child-
friendly flavors, and is marketed as a healthier alternative to smoking—must be
8 harmless. I have to explain to kids that e-cigarettes do not have the same positive
health benefits as the fruits whose flavor they copy. Even the term vapor calls to
9 mind harmless water vapor. There is no water in these products.
10 Winickoff Testimony at 1.
11
H. JUUL’s Remedial Measures
12
137. In the face of increasing public scrutiny and pressure, JUUL has taken action to
13
curb underage use of its products, but its efforts have been ineffective at best and aggravating at
14
worse. After media and researchers brought JUUL’s advertising tactics front and center, it
15
16 launched a new ad campaign focusing on former smokers and deleted social media accounts.
17 But, JUUL designed its social media campaign to subsist off of user-made content, which
18 remains unaffected by the absence of a JUUL-run account. In fact, as noted above, posts relating
19
to JUUL increased after it stopped its own social media advertising.
20
138. Lisa Davidson, Prevention and Intervention Manager at Seattle Public Schools,
21
has recognized this problem, telling KUOW last year that pulling the advertising from social
22
media likely won’t make a huge difference because JUUL already has so much market share, and
23
24
25 215
Denise Grady, Vaping Illnesses Top 1,000, C.D.C., N.Y. Times (Oct. 3, 2019),
26 https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/03/health/vaping-illnesses-cdc.html.
216
Ed Shanahan & Azi Paybarah, Bronx Teenager’s Death Is the Youngest Vaping Fatality in U.S., N.Y. Times
(Oct. 8, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/08/nyregion/vaping-death.html.
1 young people are ready to fill that gap. “Peer promotion is a huge thing,” said Davidson, “Young
2 people taking videos of themselves vaping, or photos of themselves vaping and posting it.”217
3
139. In November 2018, JUUL announced changes to the sale and marketing of its
4
flavored pods, but these changes are similarly unlikely to be effective in curbing the crisis. JUUL
5
slightly modified its flavor names (i.e., “Cool Mint” is now “Mint,” “Crème Brulee” is now
6
7 “Creme”), and it limited the flavors carried by retail stores to tobacco, menthol, and mint, while
8 continuing to offer the full range of flavors (including the popular Mango) online—a market
9 which teens are particularly adept at navigating. As Dr. Winickoff testified before Congress:
10 [it is] completely false to suggest that mint is not an attractive flavor to children.
11 From candy canes to toothpaste, children are introduced to mint flavor from a
young age. Not only do children enjoy mint, but it has special properties that
12 make it an especially dangerous flavor for tobacco. Menthol’s anesthetic
properties cool the throat, mask the harshness of nicotine, and make it easier for
13 children to start using and continue using tobacco products. The impact of mint
and menthol flavors on increasing youth tobacco addiction is well documented.
14
Winickoff Testimony at 3. Davidson agreed. In 2018, she told KUOW that “[t]he device is still
15
16 very attractive to youth, menthol and mint are still available in stores, and they get it from their
23
24
25
217
Radil, supra note 10.
26 218
Radil, supra note 10.
219
Id.
1 141. On October 17, 2019, JUUL announced that it would suspend the sale of certain
2 flavors even online.220 However, this is likely to have minimal impact given that JUUL will
3
continue to sell the mint and menthol flavors. Recent research shows that 60% of high school
4
JUUL users prefer mint and menthol.221 Robin Koval, CEO and president of Truth Initiative,
5
echoed Dr. Winickoff’s testimony, stating that that mint and menthol are among the most
6
7 popular flavors for youth and that “We also know, as does the tobacco industry, that menthol has
8 been and continues to be the starter flavor of choice for young cigarette users.”222 As former
9 New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg put it, “JUUL’s decision to keep mint- and menthol-
10 flavored e-cigarettes on the shelves is a page right out of the tobacco industry’s playbook.”223
11
Almost a month later, JUUL announced that it would stop selling mint, but will continue to sell
12
menthol flavored products.224
13
142. In addition, on November 4, 2019, VICE Magazine reported that when it visited
14
15 more than 20 stores in New York City, all but two of the stores selling JUUL products had at
16 least one of the banned flavors available in stores, including the popular mango flavor.225 Some
17 of these stores were displaying these products even after JUUL announced that it would not
18
suspend the sale of certain flavors. According to one bodega owner, the last time a JUUL
19
representative came into his store, flavored pods like mango were on display, but the
20
21
220
Allison Aubrey, Juul Suspends Sales of Flavored Vapes and Signs Settlement to Stop Marketing to Youth, NPR
22 (Oct. 17, 2019), https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/10/17/771098368/juul-suspends-sales-of-
flavored-vapes-and-signs-settlement-to-stop-marketing-to-.
23 221
Lindsey Tanner, US teen vaping numbers climb, fueled by Juul & mint flavor, Associated Press (Nov. 5, 2019),
https://apnews.com/8151770f69fd43c4b132854a335d0ef1.
24 222
Id.
223
Id.
25 224
Associated Press, Juul Halts Sales of Mint, Its Top-Selling e-Cigarette Flavor, N.Y. Times (Nov. 7, 2019),
26 https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2019/11/07/health/bc-us-med-juul-flavor.html.
225
Hannah Smothers, JUUL’s ‘Banned’ Flavors Are Still Absolutely Available in New York City, VICE (Nov. 4,
2019), https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwepnj/juul-pod-banned-flavors-still-available-in-new-york-city.
1 representative said nothing about them.226 Photographs taken for this article show both mango
2 flavored JUUL products and flavored Eonsmoke products are still being sold side by side as
3
recently as mid-October 2019.
4
I. JUUL and Schools
5
143. In addition to severe health consequences, widespread “JUULing” has placed
6
severe burdens on society and schools in particular. It is not an overstatement to say that JUUL
7
8 has changed the educational experience of students across the nation. As one vape shop manager
9 told KOMO News, “It’s the new high school thing. Everyone’s got the JUUL.”227
16 added that her friends use JUUL even though they would not smoke cigarettes.231
17
18
19
20
21
22
226
23 Id.
227
Juuling at School, supra note 87.
24 228
Id.
229
Alison Grande, ‘Juuling’: Vaping device that looks like USB drive popular with teens, Kiro 7 News (Dec. 8,
25 2017), https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/juuling-vaping-device-that-looks-like-usb-drive-popular-with-
teens/660965605.
26 230
Id.
231
Id.
1 145. JUUL use has completely changed school bathrooms—now known as “the Juul
2 room.”232 As one high school student explained, “it’s just a cloud.”233 The ubiquity of JUUL use
3
in high school bathrooms has generated numerous online spoofs about “the juul room.”
4
10
11
12
13
14
234
15
16 146. As Ballard High School student Wylie Soltes said, “You can pull it out, you can
17 have it anywhere. To smoke a cigarette you have to hit the bus stop. You want a Juul you hit the
18 bathroom, it’s easy.”235 Soltes added that JUUL “market[s] it as an alternative to cigarettes but
19
really it’s a bunch of kids who have never picked up a pack and they’re starting their nicotine
20
21
22 232
Moriah Balingit, In the ‘Juul room’: E-cigarettes spawn a form of teen addiction that worries doctors, parents
and schools, Wash. Post (July 26, 2019), https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/helpless-to-the-draw-
23 of-nicotine-doctors-parents-and-schools-grapple-with-teens-addicted-to-e-cigarettes/2019/07/25/e1e8ac9c-830a-
11e9-933d-7501070ee669_story.html.
24 233
Greta Jochem, Juuling in School: e-Cigarette Use Prevalent Among Local Youth, Daily Hampshire Gazette
(Nov. 13, 2018), https://www.gazettenet.com/Juuling-in-Schools-21439655.
25 234
Juul Hashtag Meme, Stanford U. Res. into the Impact of Tobacco Advert. (2018),
26 http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco_main/images_pods.php?token2=fm_pods_st681.php&token1=fm_pods_img
37610.php&theme_file=fm_pods_mt068.php&theme_name=JUUL&subtheme_name=%23juul.
235
Grande, supra note 236.
1 addiction there.”236 Students at Roosevelt High School, also part of Seattle Public Schools, stated
2 that students had “set off the fire alarm four times last year from vaping in the bathrooms [at
3
school],” adding that it is commonplace to see students vaping in school bathrooms or in the
4
parking lot.237
5
147. Kids have also coined the term “nic sick”—which, as one high school student
6
7 explained to CBS News, “kinda seems like a really bad flu, like, just out of nowhere. Your face
8 goes pale, you start throwing up and stuff, and you just feel horrible.”
9 148. Such rampant JUUL use and use of copycat products like Eonsmoke has
10 effectively added another category to teachers’ and school administrators’ job descriptions; many
11
now receive special training to respond to the various problems that JUUL use presents, both in
12
and out of the classroom. A national survey of middle schools and high schools found that 43.3%
13
of schools have had to implement not only an e-cigarette policy but a JUUL-specific policy.
14
15 Participants in the survey reported multiple barriers to enforcing these policies, including the
16 discreet appearance of the product, difficulty pinpointing the vapor or scent, and the addictive
23 almost half (46 percent) reported camera surveillance elsewhere in the school, and 23 percent
24
25 236
Id.
237
26 Manisha Jha, ‘You need to stop vaping right now’: Students and faculty react to Washington vape ban, The
Daily, U. of Wash. (Sept. 30, 2019), http://www.dailyuw.com/news/article_960d8692-e324-11e9-870c-
9f9d571115d6.html.
1 reported using assigned teachers for restroom surveillance. Some schools have responded by
2 removing bathroom doors or even shutting bathrooms down, and schools have banned flash
3
drives to avoid any confusion between flash drives and JUULs. Schools have also paid thousands
4
of dollars to install special monitors to detect vaping, which they say is a small price to pay
5
compared to the plumbing repairs otherwise spent as a result of students flushing vaping
6
7 paraphernalia down toilets. Other school districts have sought state grant money to create new
8 positions for tobacco prevention supervisors, who get phone alerts when vape smoke is detected
9 in bathrooms.
10 150. Many schools have shifted their disciplinary policies in order to effectively
11
address the vaping and JUUL epidemic. Rather than immediately suspending students for a first
12
offense, school districts have created anti-vaping curricula which students are required to follow
13
in sessions held outside of normal school hours, including on Saturdays. Teachers prepare
14
15 lessons and study materials for these sessions with information on the marketing and health
16 dangers of vaping —extra work which requires teachers to work atypical hours early in the
17 mornings and on weekends. Some schools will increase their drug testing budget to include
18
random nicotine tests for students before they join extracurricular activities. Under this drug-
19
testing protocol, first offenders will undergo drug and alcohol educational programming; second
20
and third offenders with be forced to sit out from extracurriculars and attend substance abuse
21
counseling.
22
23 151. JUUL actively sought to enter school campuses. The Subcommittee on Economic
1 Subcommittee found that “(1) Juul deployed a sophisticated program to enter schools and convey
2 its messaging directly to teenage children; (2) Juul also targeted teenagers and children, as young
3
as eight years-old, in summer camps and public out-of-school programs; and (3) Juul recruited
4
thousands of online “influencers” to market to teens.”
5
152. According to the Subcommittee, JUUL was willing to pay schools and
6
7 organizations hundreds of thousands of dollars to have more direct access to kids. Such attempts
8 included paying a Baltimore charter school organization $134,000 to start a summer camp to
9 teach kids healthy lifestyles, for which JUUL itself would provide the curriculum; offering
10 schools $10,000 to talk to students on campus; and giving the Police Activities League in
11
Richmond, California, $90,000 to provide JUUL’s own vaping education program, “Moving
12
On,” to teenage students suspended for using cigarettes. Meanwhile, JUUL would collect data
13
about test scores, surveys, and activity logs about the students.
14
15 153. Among the more egregious incidents reported by the Subcommittee was a July
16 24, 2019 presentation in which no parents or teachers were in the room for the presentation, the
17 message conveyed was that the JUUL product was “totally safe,” and the presenter even
18
demonstrated to the students how to use a JUUL. The school was presumably paid for this
19
meeting, which was marketed to the school as an anti-smoking initiative. A JUUL spokesman
20
said JUUL is no longer funding such programs.
21
J. Efforts to Address Youth Vaping in King County and Washington State
22
23 154. In King County, as in many other communities in the United States, youth vapor
24 use has reached “epidemic levels.” 238 This is directly tied to Defendants’ conduct. As the King
25
238
26 Seattle & King County Department of Public Health, Vapor & E-Cigarette Use in Seattle & King County 1,
https://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/health/tobacco/~/media/depts/health/tobacco-vapor/documents/vaping-
infographic.ashx (accessed Oct. 11, 2019).
1 County Public Health department observed in 2018, “[y]outh are using e-cigarettes more than
2 any other tobacco products, and when they do, they’re probably using JUUL.”239 In addition,
3
survey results statewide indicate that certain populations already burdened by health disparities
4
may be significantly affected by the spread of vaping, with the highest rate of vaping among 8th
5
graders reported by Hispanic youth and the highest rate among both 10th and 12th graders
6
8 King County is also especially prevalent in vulnerable populations of youth, including lesbian,
15 JUULs “presents a threat to the public health.”243 The Board of Health recognized that these
16 products “have a high appeal to youth due to their high tech design and child-friendly flavors”
17 and that they “present a substantial risk of nicotine addiction and resultant harm to the public
18
health and safety.”244 King County regulations prohibit anyone from providing an vaping product
19
20
21
239
King County Public Health Insider, supra note 147.
22 240
Id.
241
Seattle & King County Department of Public Health, supra note 245.
23 242
Amy Blondin & Kristen Maki, Alcohol use remains at an all time low while vaping use increases among
Washington youth, Wash. State Health Youth Survey (Mar. 18, 2019),
24
http://www.askhys.net/Docs/Healthy%20Youth%20Survey%20Substance%20Use%20Press%20Release%20Fin
al.pdf
25 243
Tobacco Products, Electronic Smoking Devices and Unapproved Nicotine Delivery Products at 19.12.030, King
26 County Board of Health Reg. (Feb. 15, 2019), https://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/health/tobacco/~/media/depts
/health/board-of-health/documents/code/BOH-Code-Title-19.ashx.
244
Id.
1 to a minor and prohibit certain practices that are likely to allow minors to get access to these
2 products, such as giving away free samples or selling vaping products from vending machines.245
3
157. Washington State has also recognized the urgency of the youth vaping problem
4
and taken measures to combat it. On September 27, 2019, Governor Jay Inslee ordered the
5
Washington State Department of Health to ban all flavored vaping products.246 Governor Inslee
6
7 agreed with the FDA: “e-cigarette use among youth has reached epidemic proportions and this
8 epidemic presents a clear and present danger.”247 He explained that “vapor products containing
9 nicotine are the most commonly used nicotine products in Washington among youth,” that
10 “vapor product use increased dramatically among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders between 2016 and
11
2018” and that “an overwhelming majority” of youth who use vape using flavored products.”248
12
Inslee found that “the appeal of flavored nicotine products, as well as advertising and promotion
13
activities targeted at youth, are contributing to the dramatic increase in youth vaping.”249
14
15 158. Washington State Senator Patty Kuderer, who spoke at the press conference
16 announcing Inslee’s Executive Order explained why this step was important:
17 The rise of vaping has threatened hard earned progress to reduce nicotine addiction
with the same tactics that were tried and true for Marlboro and Kool, utilizing
18
gimmicks to attract young people. Gummy bear and blue raspberry flavoring aren’t
19 designed to help adults kick their addiction to tobacco, they are designed to entice
children to their product.250
20
Defendant Eonsmoke sells both gummy bear and blue raspberry flavored vaping pods or juice.
21
22
245
23 Id. at 19.12.050-19.12.090.
246
Inslee, supra note 99.
24 247
Id.
248
Id.
25 249
Id.
250
26 Wash. Governor’s Office, Inslee issues executive order to change how state will regulate vaping industry in light
of recent health crisis, Medium (Sept. 27, 2019), https://medium.com/wagovernor/inslee-issues-executive-order-
to-change-how-state-will-regulate-vaping-industry-in-light-of-recent-87c296c4f698.
7 160. While these measures are important, they cannot fully address the existing
8 widespread use of vapor products and resulting nicotine addiction among youth. Because of the
9 potency of JUUL’s nicotine salts and the ease of delivery—allowing kids to take a puff as often
10 as every few minutes—widespread “juuling” has created a problem of addiction much greater
11
than that caused by youth cigarette smoking. As the researchers conducting the national
12
Monitoring the Future survey wrote in a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine last
13
month,
14
15 Current efforts by the vaping industry, government agencies, and schools have
thus far proved insufficient to stop the rapid spread of nicotine vaping among
16 adolescents. Of particular concern are the accompanying increases in the
proportions of youth who are physically addicted to nicotine, an addiction that is
17 very difficult to overcome once established. The substantial levels of daily vaping
suggest the development of nicotine addiction. New efforts are needed to protect
18
youth from using nicotine during adolescence, when the developing brain is
19 particularly susceptible to permanent changes from nicotine use and when almost
all nicotine addiction is established.252
20
21
22
23
24
25 251
King 5 Staff, Washington Board of Health bans flavored vaping products, King 5 News, (Oct. 9, 2019)
26 https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/washington-board-of-health-bans-flavored-vaping-products/281-
ddad5104-7d18-4f96-a2c5-6ff1ed162428.
252
Trends in Adolescent Vaping, supra note 4.
8 forefront of the youth vaping crisis locally. Based on 2018 survey data, 15% of SPS 8th graders,
9 34.8% of 10th graders, and 43.3% of 12th graders have tried vapor products.257 The percentage
10 of SPS students considered current users (i.e., who reported vaping at least once in the past 30
11
days) in 2018 were 8.1% of 8th graders, 20.7% of 10th graders and 25.7% of 12th graders258—a
12
significant increase over the 2016 current-use rates, which were 3.0% of 8th graders, 6.3% of
13
10th graders, and 15.6% of 12th graders.259
14
163. Seattle Public Schools has been specially affected by the youth vaping epidemic.
15
16 In an interview from 2018, Lisa Davidson, SPS’s Prevention and Intervention Manager,
19
20 253
About Seattle Public Schools, Seattle Pub. Schs., https://www.seattleschools.org/district/district_quick_facts (last
visited Nov. 4, 2019).
21 254
Quick Facts: King County, Washington, U.S. Census Bureau,
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/map/kingcountywashington/PST045216 (last visited Nov. 4, 2019).
22 255
Gene Balk, Big-city growth slows across U.S. – but Seattle still ranks No. 2 in 2018, Seattle Times (May 23,
2018), https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/data/big-city-growth-slows-across-u-s-but-seattle-still-ranks-no-
23 2-in-2018/.
256
About Seattle Public Schools, supra at note 260.
24 257
Healthy Youth Survey 2018 at 10, supra note 8.
258
25 Healthy Youth Survey 2018 at 11, supra note 8.
259
Healthy Youth Survey 2016 Report of Participating Schools: Seattle Public Schools Grades 6, 8, 10, and 12 at
26 10, Healthy Youth Survey (Mar. 1, 2017),
https://www.seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/CoordSchoolHealth/Healt
hyYouthSurvey/Dist17001MultiGr.pdf.
1 We even had a few instances of students as young as 5th grade vaping at school
this year. Students have been found vaping on campus, in bathrooms and
2 hallways, and in parking lots. Students report not knowing that vaping is illegal
on campus or for people under age 18. Students also report not knowing the
3
potential negative effects vaping may have on their health.260
4
The disruptive effects of vaping on day-to-day operations for Seattle Public Schools have
5
multiplied rapidly in a short time. In fact, in 2016, vaping rates among SPS students appeared to
6
be declining compared to 2014 rates. But with the rising popularity of JUUL, any decline
7
8 disappeared. Instead, following “the invention of new, cooler, sleeker products,” as Davidson
9 explained, SPS staff and students saw a rise in vaping, as well as a rise in disciplinary actions.261
10 According to Davidson, in the 2017-2018 school year, 90 percent of SPS’s tobacco and nicotine
11
violations were for vaping—and over 60 percent of those were for JUULs specifically.262 This
12
trend has continued: in the 2018-2019 school year, 94% of the nicotine and tobacco violations
13
were for vapor products, and so far in the 2019-2020 school year, 100% of the violations have
14
been for vapor products.
15
16 164. Seattle Public Schools has been directly affected by this surge in youth vaping
17 caused by Defendants’ misconduct and has had to spend substantial time and resources
18 combating vaping in schools, training teachers and parents, and disseminating information about
19
the dangers of youth vaping.
20
165. One of the challenges of this crisis is that misinformation about vaping is
21
widespread, and traditional anti-smoking messaging is ineffective against vapor products. For
22
24 Young people say cigarettes are gross. They know that, right? They know they get
bad breath, and that they smell and all those things. But then when we talk to them
25
260
Id.
26 261
Radil, supra note 10.
262
Id.
1 about vaping, they’re like, ‘but vaping gives me minty breath and it makes me smell
like mangoes!’
2
We have heard mostly from kids that they are excited about it, they think it’s a
3 healthier alternative, it’s not harmful, they can stop at any time.263
4
166. SPS Prevention and Intervention Program staff have worked to counter this
5
misinformation through the development of curricula, factsheets, posted signage in school
6
bathrooms and elsewhere on school property, and in-person trainings for parents and community
7
8 members. SPS staff updated existing substance use prevention materials to incorporate vapor
9 products and developed vaping-specific lessons for elementary, middle, and high school
10 students, including hour-long lesson plans. SPS teachers have then invested time in delivering
11 these lessons to students—which is time that would have otherwise been devoted to teaching
12
other lessons.
13
167. In addition to training teachers, SPS Prevention and Intervention Program staff
14
have also trained administrators, counselors, nurses, and librarians on how to recognize the vape
15
16 pods used in JUULs and similar devices as well as the telltale scents of popular vape flavors.
17 SPS also delivers training to community partners, such as the County Parks and Recreation
18 department, and, critically, to parents of SPS students. As one SPS parent told a reporter, he
19
wanted to organize a parent education event at his child’s middle school because he doesn’t
20
know the warning signs: “I don’t know necessarily what to watch out for.”264 But the size of the
21
district and the urgency of the vaping crisis means that SPS Prevention and Intervention Program
22
staff cannot keep up with the requests for information. SPS’s Davidson delivered information
23
25
263
Radil, supra note 10.
26 264
Joel Moreno, King County teen with vaping illness raises concerns for parents, Komo News (Sept. 13, 2019),
https://komonews.com/news/local/king-county-teen-with-vaping-illness-raises-concerns-for-parents.
1 168. The youth vaping epidemic has significantly disrupted SPS’s operations.
2 Although Seattle Public Schools has banned e-cigarettes from its premises,265 vaping is still
3
widespread on SPS secondary school campuses. Some high school students report that their
4
classmates are vaping in class.266 Vaping is also a significant problem within SPS middle
5
schools. And on a handful of occasions, elementary school students have been found vaping on
6
7 the playground.
8 169. Students who are vaping during the school day are losing valuable learning time
9 by leaving the classroom to vape. Vaping also has triggered fire alarms in SPS’s bathrooms,
10 forcing the entire building to evacuate. This causes all of the students in the school to miss out of
11
portions of the lesson for that day, disrupting their education and SPS’s educational mission.
12
Moreover, the nature of JUUL’s products and copycat “JUULalikes” means that some SPS
13
students are experiencing a level of nicotine addiction that is disrupting their ability to
14
15 concentrate and to learn. For example, Davidson reported that students are telling her, “I don’t
16 like the way it makes me feel anymore, I think about it too much, I have a hard time being home
22
23
24 265
Tobacco-Free Environment, Seattle Pub. Schs. (Nov. 16, 2016),
https://www.seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/School%20Board/Policies
25 /Series%204000/4215.pdf (including nicotine and electronic smoking/vapor devices and vapor products in SPS’s
definition of “tobacco products”).
26 266
Moreno, supra note 271.
267
Radil, supra note 10.
1 sustained screening and intervention services across all SPS schools, particularly the secondary
2 schools.
3
171. In addition, even when students seek treatment themselves, there are limited
4
options for both the immediate treatment of nicotine addiction for youth and the long-term
5
behavioral support for recovery from vaping addiction. Staff at SPS’s school-based health
6
7 centers have fielded questions from students about nicotine replacement products and treated
8 students experiencing nicotine withdrawal, but there is a need to expand treatment options for
9 youth specifically.
10 172. The pervasiveness of student vaping requires assistant principals and security staff
11
to spend increased time patrolling school grounds and necessitates increased resources devoted
12
to responding to violations. In SPS, nicotine violations, including vaping, are school-based, not
13
suspendable, offenses; if a student is caught vaping, school staff will confiscate the student’s
14
15 device, contact the student’s parents, provide a tobacco factsheet that includes information about
16 vaping, and, at the high school level, require the student to complete a 90-minute online
17 intervention course. The continued availability of this intervention course to students will require
18
additional funding, as SPS purchased a finite number of enrollments. A second violation of
19
SPS’s anti-smoking policy, which includes vapor products, requires students to write an essay on
20
the ways that companies target certain groups, such as youth, women, the LGBT community,
21
African Americans, etc., and how it applies to their own life. School administrators then must
22
23 review these essays to ensure compliance with the prompt and anti-plagiarism rules.268 As
24 mentioned above, 90 percent of tobacco and nicotine violations in Seattle Public Schools for the
25
268
26 Use of Tobacco on School Property, Seattle Pub. Schs. (July 3, 3012),
https://www.seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/School%20Board/Procedu
res/Series%204000/4215SP.pdf.
1 2017-2018 school year were for vaping products and more than 60 percent of those were for
2 JUUL products specifically.269
3
173. Other examples of the far-reaching impacts of youth vaping on SPS staff include
4
increased workload for school custodians, who are charged with maintaining the bathrooms
5
where students congregate to vape and now have to deal with garbage containing nicotine
6
7 cartridges and other toxic chemicals products, and increased workload for school bus drivers,
8 who now have to intervene to stop students from vaping while riding the bus.
9 174. Seattle Public Schools’ responses to the rise in youth vaping are limited by
10 available resources, especially the number of full-time employees. Fully addressing the harms to
11
Seattle Public Schools caused by Defendants’ conduct will require a comprehensive approach,
12
one that includes, among other things, sustained efforts by specialists who can provide
13
counseling support to students in the schools, especially middle schools. For Seattle Public
14
15 Schools, covering each middle and high school would require 50 additional full-time employees.
16 Resources are also needed to develop or purchase relevant, evidence-based, and up-to-date
17 curricula on vaping prevention and to train teachers in it. Additional resources are needed to fund
18
district-wide screening, intervention, and referral services that include vaping.
19
175. Without the resources to fund additional staff, implement prevention education,
20
conduct screening and intervention, and other these measures, Seattle Public Schools will
21
continue to be harmed by the ongoing consequences of Defendants’ conduct.
22
23
24
25
26
269
Radil, supra note 10.
1 V. CAUSES OF ACTION
2 VIOLATIONS OF THE WASHINGTON PUBLIC NUISANCE LAW,
RCW 7.48.010, ET SEQ.
3
4 176. Plaintiff Seattle Public Schools incorporates each preceding paragraph as though
12 health or safety of others, offends decency . . . or in any way renders other persons insecure in
19 unequal.”
20 182. Employees and patrons, including students, of Seattle Public Schools have a right
21 to be free from conduct that endangers their health and safety. Yet Defendants have engaged in
22 conduct which endangers or injures the health and safety of the employees and students of
23
Seattle Public Schools by their production, promotion, distribution, and marketing of vapor
24
products for use by minors in Seattle Public Schools and in a manner that substantially interferes
25
with the functions and operations of Seattle Public Schools and impacts the public health, safety,
26
and welfare of the Seattle Public Schools community.
1 183. Each Defendant has created or assisted in the creation of a condition that is
2 injurious to the health and safety of Plaintiff and its students and employees and interferes with
3
the comfortable enjoyment of life and property of the Seattle Public Schools community.
4
184. Defendants’ conduct has directly caused a severe disruption of the public health,
5
order, and safety. Defendants’ conduct is ongoing and continues to produce permanent and long-
6
7 lasting damage.
8 185. This harm to the Plaintiff outweighs any social utility of the Defendants’ wrongful
9 conduct because Defendants’ conduct violates Washington’s public policy against marketing
10 vapor products like JUUL to minors. This policy is expressed through Washington State
11
Governor Jay Inslee’s Executive Order 19-03, finding that “it is the policy of the state of
12
Washington to support the health, safety, and well-being of all Washingtonians” and that “e-
13
cigarette use among youth has reached epidemic proportions and that this epidemic presents a
14
15 clear and present danger.” This policy is also expressed through statutes, including but not
16 limiting to
17 A. RCW 26.28.080, under which any person who sells, gives, or permits to be
sold or given vapor products to a minor is guilty of a gross misdemeanor;
18
17 G. Promoting and assisting the growth of the vapor market and its availability
with knowledge that vapor products were being purchased and used by
18
large numbers of youth.
19
187. The health and safety of the students and employees of Seattle Public Schools,
20
including those who use, have used, or will use vapor products, as well as those affected by
21
others’ use of vapor products, are matters of substantial public interest and of legitimate concern
22
23 to Plaintiff.
24 188. Defendants’ conduct has affected and continues to affect a substantial number of
25 people within Seattle Public Schools and is likely to continue causing significant harm.
26
1 189. But for Defendants’ actions, the use of vapor products by minors would not be as
2 widespread as it is today, and the vaping public health epidemic that currently exists as a result
3
of the Defendants’ conduct would have been averted.
4
190. Logic, common sense, justice, policy, and precedent indicate Defendants’ unfair
5
and deceptive conduct has caused the damage and harm complained of herein. Defendants knew
6
7 or reasonably should have known that their statements regarding the risks and benefits of JUUL
8 or Eonsmoke were false and misleading, that their marketing methods were designed to appeal to
9 minors, and that their false and misleading statements, marketing to minors, and active efforts to
10 increase the accessibility of JUUL products or Eonsmoke products and grow JUUL’s market
11
share, or the market share of Eonsmoke, were causing harm to minors and to schools, including
12
minors in Seattle Public Schools.
13
191. Thus, the public nuisance caused by Defendants was reasonably foreseeable,
14
15 including the financial and economic losses incurred by Seattle Public Schools.
16 192. Alternatively, Defendants’ conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the
17 public nuisance even if a similar result would have occurred without it. By directly marketing to
18
youth and continuing marketing practices after it was evident that children were using JUUL
19
products in large numbers and were specifically using these products in school, JUUL directly
20
facilitated the spread of the youth vaping epidemic and the public nuisance effecting Seattle
21
Public Schools. By seeking to capitalize on JUUL’s success in addicting minors to nicotine and
22
23 by directly marketing to youth and continuing marketing practices after it was evident that
24 children were using JUUL products and Eonsmoke products in large numbers and were
25 specifically using these products in school, Eonsmoke directly facilitated the spread of the youth
26
vaping epidemic and the public nuisance effecting Seattle Public Schools. And, by investing
1 billions of dollars in JUUL and actively working to promote the sale and spread of JUUL
2 products with knowledge of JUUL’s practice of marketing its products to youth and failure to
3
control youth access to its products, Altria directly facilitated the spread of the youth vaping
4
epidemic and the public nuisance effecting Seattle Public Schools.
5
193. In addition, engaging in any business in defiance of a law regulating or
6
7 prohibiting the same is a nuisance per se under Washington law. Defendants’ conduct described
8 herein of deceptively marketing JUUL products or Eonsmoke products to minors violates RCW
15 195. Plaintiff has had to take steps to mitigate the harm and disruption caused by
19 abatement of the public nuisance that Defendants have created or assisted in the creation of, and
21 198. Pursuant to RCW 7.48.020, Plaintiff also seeks the maximum statutory and civil
22
penalties permitted by law, including actual and compensatory damages, as a result of the public
23
nuisance created by Defendants.
24
199. Pursuant to RCW 4.22.070, Defendants are jointly and severally liable because
25
they have acted in concert with each other and because Plaintiff is not at fault.
26
5 201. This claim is brought by Plaintiff against JUUL and the Altria Defendants for
6 actual damages, treble damages, and equitable relief under 18 U.S.C. § 1964 for violations of 18
7
U.S.C. § 1961, et seq.
8
202. At all relevant times, each of these Defendants is and has been a “person” within
9
the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1961(3), because they are capable of holding, and do hold, “a legal
10
12 203. Plaintiff is a “person,” as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1961(3), and has
13 standing to sue as it was and is injured in its business and/or property as a result of the
14 Defendants’ wrongful conduct described herein.
15
204. Section 1962(c) makes it “unlawful for any person employed by or associated
16
with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce,
17
to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through
18
20 205. Section 1962(d) makes it unlawful for “any person to conspire to violate” Section
25
26
8 those associated with the enterprise, and (iii) longevity sufficient to pursue the enterprise’s
9 purpose. See Boyle v. United States, 556 U.S. 938, 946 (2009).
16 210. As set forth above, Big Tobacco has long known the importance of targeting
17 youth and addicting them to nicotine. This profits-above-public-health mentality applies with
18 equal to force to e-cigarette market as well as the market for regular cigarettes. What was
19
different here was that Big Tobacco was out-competed by a start-up, albeit a start-up using some
20
of Big Tobacco’s tried and true tactics. As set forth in the complaint, JUUL obtained its massive
21
market share over a short time period by successfully targeting youth and addicting youth to
22
23 nicotine.
24 211. JUUL was well aware that its conduct was reprehensible, and that if it became
25 established and widely known that this was how JUUL obtained its massive market share, there
26 would likely be severe consequences. For this reason, it went to great lengths to conceal this
1 conduct by vociferously denying that it was marketing and targeting youth. Instead, JUUL
2 argued that its product was created and designed as a “smoking cessation device”—despite the
3
fact that the FDA never approved it as such, and that this smoking cessation device was slickly
4
designed, easily concealable, and had its own “party mode.” These false statements were
5
designed to protect JUUL’s market share by concealing its misconduct.
6
8 212. Not everyone was fooled by JUUL’s deception, particularly JUUL’s competitors
9 in the e-cigarette market. Altria recognized JUUL’s tactics for what they were, designed to addict
10 children, and made this clear in a public letter to the FDA on October 25, 2018. Altria even
11
displayed this letter on its website, disclaiming the very marketing and advertising tactics JUUL
12
relied on. At this time, Altria had apparently concluded that it could not out-compete JUUL—
13
that JUUL’s massive market share was too great to overcome. Altria informed the FDA that it
14
was exiting the market for pod-based e-cigarettes, on the grounds that these products contributed
15
17 213. Unfortunately, Altria’s purported concern for the public health was short-lived. A
18 mere two months after publicly condemning JUUL’s tactics for targeting youth, in December of
19
2018, Altria once again chose to place profits before the public health by making a $12.8 billion
20
equity investment in JUUL, the largest equity investment in US history. Having long followed
21
JUUL’s market share dominance with envy, Altria decided to go from a competitor to a co-
22
23 conspirator. Altria and JUUL thus formed a RICO enterprise—the JUUL Enterprise—with the
25 214. The JUUL Enterprise recognized that one of the keys to preserving JUUL’s
26 market share was to continue to falsely deny that JUUL marketed its tobacco products to youth.
1 Thus, in furtherance of their Enterprise, JUUL and Altria repeatedly made statements denying
2 that one of JUUL’s intended targets for its product was children, that JUUL’s product was really
3
created and designed as a smoking cessation device, and that JUUL’s product was all along
4
intended for “switchers” (existing smokers that were open to vaping). These statements are false,
5
and constitute mail and wire fraud, predicate acts under RICO.
6
7 215. Thus, at all relevant times, each Defendant was aware of the conduct of the JUUL
8 Enterprise, was a knowing and willing participant in that conduct, and reaped profits from that
15 217. Altria has already publicly acknowledged that under the terms of its financial
16 relationship with JUUL, Altria will provide its considerable legal, regulatory and lobbying
17 expertise to help JUUL navigate its relationship with regulators. Presumably this would also
18
include former Commissioner Gottlieb’s agency, the FDA. After receiving Altria’s October letter
19
criticizing JUUL’s tactics, and learning of Altria’s $12.8 billion investment, FDA Commissioner
20
Gottlieb was outraged and demanded a meeting. Commissioner Gottlieb described this meeting
21
as “difficult” and “did not come away with any evidence that public health concerns drove
22
23 Altria’s decision to invest in JUUL, and instead sa[id] it looks like a business decision.” Roughly
1 market share is shared. Typically, this communication occurred, and continues to occur, through
2 the use of the wires and the mail in which Defendants share information regarding the operation
3
of the JUUL Enterprise and its cover-up of JUUL’s efforts to target and addict youth.
4
219. The JUUL Enterprise functions as a continuing unit for the purposes of executing
5
accomplishing its objectives, and when issues arise, each member of the Enterprise agrees to take
6
8 220. Each Defendant participated in the operation and management of the JUUL
9 Enterprise by directing its affairs as described herein. Altria’s $12.8 billion investment gives it a
10 35% ownership stake in JUUL, and allows it to appoint a third of its board. In a sign of Altria’s
11
management influence and control, last month, JUUL’s CEO resigned to be replaced by a career
12
Altria executive, K.C. Crosthwaite. Mr. Crosthwaite had most recently served as the vice
13
president and chief growth officer of Altria Client Services LLC, overseeing the company’s
14
15 work, including digital marketing, packaging design & innovation, product development, and
16 safety, health, and environmental affairs. Crosthwaite is intimately familiar with Big Tobacco’s
17 practices, having previously served as the president and CEO of Phillip Morris USA, the vice
18
president and general manager at Marlboro, and the vice president of strategy and business
19
development of at Altria Client Services LLC.
20
221. While Defendants participate in, and are members of, the JUUL Enterprise, they
21
have an existence separate from the Enterprise, including distinct legal statuses, affairs, offices
22
24 222. Without the willing participation of each Defendant, the JUUL Enterprise’s
25 common course of conduct would not be successful.
26
9 224. Specifically, the members of the JUUL Enterprise have committed, conspired to
10 commit, and/or aided and abetted in the commission of, at least two predicate acts of
11
racketeering activity (i.e., violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343), within the past ten years.
12
225. The multiple acts of racketeering activity which the members of the JUUL
13
Enterprise committed, or aided or abetted in the commission of, were related to each other, posed
14
a threat of continued racketeering activity, and therefore constitute a “pattern of racketeering
15
16 activity.”
17 226. The racketeering activity was made possible by the Enterprise’s regular use of the
18 facilities, services, and employees of the Enterprise.
19
227. The members of the JUUL Enterprise participated in the Enterprise by using mail,
20
telephone, and the internet to transmit mailings and wires in interstate or foreign commerce.
21
228. The members of the JUUL Enterprise used, directed the use of, and/or caused to
22
23 be used, thousands of interstate mail and wire communications in service of the Enterprise’s
25 229. In devising and executing the objectives of the JUUL Enterprise, its members
26 devised and knowingly carried out a material scheme and/or artifice to defraud the public by
1 denying that JUUL’s products were marketed to youth, and that JUUL was really created and
2 designed as a smoking cessation device.
3
230. For the purpose of furthering its desire to preserve and increase its market share,
4
even at the expense exposing and addicting children to nicotine, the JUUL Enterprise committed
5
these racketeering acts, which number in the thousands, intentionally and knowingly with the
6
8 231. The JUUL Enterprise’s predicate acts of racketeering (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1))
20 A. “JUUL Labs was founded by former smokers, James and Adam, with the
goal of improving the lives of the world's one billion adult smokers by
21 eliminating cigarettes. We envision a world where fewer adults use
cigarettes, and where adults who smoke cigarettes have the tools to reduce
22 or eliminate their consumption entirely, should they so desire.” (JUUL
Labs Website as of Oct. 7, 2019);
23
1 D. “Our Intent[:] . . . [W]e believe that vaping can have a positive impact
when used by adult smokers, and can have a negative impact when used
2 by nonsmokers. Our goal is to maximize the positive and reduce the
negative.” (JUUL Labs Website as of Oct. 7, 2019);
3
4 E. “It’s a really, really important issue. We don’t want kids using our
products.”( JUUL Chief Administrative Officer Ashely Gould, CNBC
5 Interview, Dec. 14, 2017);
21 I. “First of all, I’d tell them that I’m sorry that their child’s using the
product. It’s not intended for them. I hope there was nothing that we did
22 that made it appealing to them. As a parent of a 16-year-old, I’m sorry for
them, and I have empathy for them, in terms of what the challenges
23 they’re going through.” (JUUL CEO Ken Burns, CNBC Interview, July
13, 2019);
24
J. “We never wanted any non-nicotine user, and certainly nobody under the
25
legal age of purchase, to ever use Juul products. . . .That is a serious
26 problem. Our company has no higher priority than combatting underage
use.” (Testimony of JUUL Founder James Monsees Before the House
14 233. The mail and wire transmissions described herein were made in furtherance of
15 Defendants’ scheme and common course of conduct designed to cover-up JUUL’s marketing to
16 youth, thereby increasing or maintaining JUUL’s market share, resulting in corresponding high
17
profits for all Defendants.
18
234. Many of the precise dates of the fraudulent uses of the U.S. mail and interstate
19
wire facilities have been deliberately hidden and cannot be alleged without access to Defendants’
20
21 books and records. However, Plaintiff has described the types of predicate acts of mail and/or
22 wire fraud, including the specific types of fraudulent statements upon which, through the mail
23 and wires, the JUUL Enterprise engaged in fraudulent activity in furtherance of its scheme.
24 235. The members of the Enterprise have not undertaken the practices described herein
25
in isolation, but as part of a common scheme and conspiracy. In violation of 18 U.S.C. §
26
1962(d), the members of the JUUL Enterprise conspired to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), as
1 described herein. Various other persons, firms, and corporations, including third-party entities
2 and individuals not named as defendants in this Complaint, have participated as co-conspirators
3
with Defendants and the members of the JUUL Enterprise in these offenses and have performed
4
acts in furtherance of the conspiracy to increase or maintain revenue, maintain or increase market
5
share, and/or minimize losses for the Defendants and their named and unnamed co-conspirators
6
8 236. The members of the JUUL Enterprise aided and abetted others in the violations of
16 238. Each member of the JUUL Enterprise, with knowledge and intent, agreed to the
17 overall objectives of the schemes and participated in the common course of conduct. Indeed, for
18
the conspiracy to succeed, each of the member of the JUUL Enterprise had to agree to conceal
19
their fraudulent scheme.
20
239. The members of the JUUL Enterprise knew, and intended that, the public would
21
rely on the material misrepresentations and omissions made by them.
22
23 240. As described herein, the members of the JUUL Enterprise engaged in a pattern of
24 related and continuous predicate acts for years. The predicate acts constituted a variety of
25 unlawful activities, each conducted with the common purpose of maintaining JUUL’s ill-gotten
26
1 market share and thereby continuing to receive significant monies and revenues from the public,
2 including youth, based on their misconduct.
3
241. The predicate acts also had the same or similar results, participants, victims, and
4
methods of commission.
5
242. The predicate acts were related and not isolated events.
6
7 243. Defendants’ fraudulent concealment was material to Plaintiff and the public. The
8 pattern of racketeering activity described above is currently ongoing and open-ended, and
9 threatens to continue indefinitely unless this Court enjoins the racketeering activity.
10 D. Plaintiff Has Been Damaged by Defendants’ RICO Violations
11
244. Plaintiff has been injured by Defendants’ predicate acts. The repeated
12
misstatements by the Defendants denying that JUUL marketed to youth and addicted children to
13
nicotine serve to preserve JUUL’s market share—a market share that is based upon children
14
purchasing JUUL’s tobacco products. The creation and maintenance of this youth e-cigarette
15
16 market directly harms Plaintiff by imposing costs on its business and property.
17 245. Defendants’ violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d) have directly and
18 proximately caused injuries and damages to Seattle Public Schools and its community, and
19
Seattle Public Schools is entitled to bring this action for three times its actual damages, as well as
20
injunctive/equitable relief, costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c).
21
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
22
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as follows:
23
24 246. Entering an Order that the conduct alleged herein constitutes a public nuisance
1 248. Entering an Order requiring the Defendants to abate the public nuisance described
2 herein and to deter and/or prevent the resumption of such nuisance;
3
249. Enjoining Defendants from engaging in further actions causing or contributing to
4
the public nuisance as described herein;
5
250. Awarding equitable relief to fund prevention education and addiction treatment;
6
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
19 4845-7525-6491, v. 7
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
" - K)I) =^eTa]\T]c " / 9XeTabXch 8XcXiT] ^U 6]^cWTa IcPcT " - " - ?]R^a_^aPcTS =G@ FaX]RX_P[ F[PRT " 0 " 0
9TUT]SP]c "/G@D?=LA!)DLDRAGKCDI!HB!5=JLDAK!DG!/LAF!///# ^U 7dbX]Tbb ?] 6]^cWTa IcPcT
JWT @I // RXeX[ R^eTa bWTTc P]S cWT X]U^a\PcX^] R^]cPX]TS WTaTX] ]TXcWTa aT_[PRTb ]^a bd__[T\T]cb cWT UX[X]Vb P]S bTaeXRT ^U _[TPSX]V ^a ^cWTa _P_Tab Pb
aT`dXaTS Qh [Pf' TgRT_c Pb _a^eXSTS Qh [^RP[ ad[Tb ^U R^dac) JWXb U^a\' P__a^eTS Qh cWT @dSXRXP[ 8^]UTaT]RT ^U cWT K]XcTS IcPcTb X] IT_cT\QTa ,42/' Xb
aT`dXaTS U^a cWT dbT ^U cWT 8[TaZ ^U 8^dac U^a cWT _da_^bT ^U X]XcXPcX]V cWT RXeX[ S^RZTc bWTTc) 8^]bT`dT]c[h' P RXeX[ R^eTa bWTTc Xb bdQ\XccTS c^ cWT 8[TaZ ^U
8^dac U^a TPRW RXeX[ R^\_[PX]c UX[TS) JWT Pcc^a]Th UX[X]V P RPbT bW^d[S R^\_[TcT cWT U^a\ Pb U^[[^fb5
4&#F$ <QFNSYNKKX%/JKJSIFSYX& ;]cTa ]P\Tb %[Pbc' UXabc' \XSS[T X]XcXP[& ^U _[PX]cXUU P]S STUT]SP]c) ?U cWT _[PX]cXUU ^a STUT]SP]c Xb P V^eTa]\T]c PVT]Rh' dbT
^][h cWT Ud[[ ]P\T ^a bcP]SPaS PQQaTeXPcX^]b) ?U cWT _[PX]cXUU ^a STUT]SP]c Xb P] ^UUXRXP[ fXcWX] P V^eTa]\T]c PVT]Rh' XST]cXUh UXabc cWT PVT]Rh P]S
cWT] cWT ^UUXRXP[' VXeX]V Q^cW ]P\T P]S cXc[T)
#G$ .TZSY\ TK >JXNIJSHJ& <^a TPRW RXeX[ RPbT UX[TS' TgRT_c K)I) _[PX]cXUU RPbTb' T]cTa cWT ]P\T ^U cWT R^d]ch fWTaT cWT UXabc [XbcTS _[PX]cXUU aTbXSTb Pc cWT
cX\T ^U UX[X]V) ?] K)I) _[PX]cXUU RPbTb' T]cTa cWT ]P\T ^U cWT R^d]ch X] fWXRW cWT UXabc [XbcTS STUT]SP]c aTbXSTb Pc cWT cX\T ^U UX[X]V) %DEJ;5 ?] [P]S
R^]ST\]PcX^] RPbTb' cWT R^d]ch ^U aTbXST]RT ^U cWT "STUT]SP]c" Xb cWT [^RPcX^] ^U cWT caPRc ^U [P]S X]e^[eTS)&
#H$ ,YYTWSJ\X& ;]cTa cWT UXa\ ]P\T' PSSaTbb' cT[T_W^]T ]d\QTa' P]S Pcc^a]Th ^U aTR^aS) ?U cWTaT PaT bTeTaP[ Pcc^a]Thb' [Xbc cWT\ ^] P] PccPRW\T]c' ]^cX]V
X] cWXb bTRcX^] "%bTT PccPRW\T]c&")
44& 5ZWNXINHYNTS& JWT QPbXb ^U YdaXbSXRcX^] Xb bTc U^acW d]STa Hd[T 3%P&' <)H)8e)F)' fWXRW aT`dXaTb cWPc YdaXbSXRcX^]b QT bW^f] X] _[TPSX]Vb) F[PRT P] "N"
X] ^]T ^U cWT Q^gTb) ?U cWTaT Xb \^aT cWP] ^]T QPbXb ^U YdaXbSXRcX^]' _aTRTST]RT Xb VXeT] X] cWT ^aSTa bW^f] QT[^f)
K]XcTS IcPcTb _[PX]cXUU) %,& @daXbSXRcX^] QPbTS ^] -3 K)I)8) ,./0 P]S ,./3) IdXcb Qh PVT]RXTb P]S ^UUXRTab ^U cWT K]XcTS IcPcTb PaT X]R[dSTS WTaT)
K]XcTS IcPcTb STUT]SP]c) %-& MWT] cWT _[PX]cXUU Xb bdX]V cWT K]XcTS IcPcTb' Xcb ^UUXRTab ^a PVT]RXTb' _[PRT P] "N" X] cWXb Q^g)
<TSTaP[ `dTbcX^]) %.& JWXb aTUTab c^ bdXcb d]STa -3 K)I)8) ,..,' fWTaT YdaXbSXRcX^] PaXbTb d]STa cWT 8^]bcXcdcX^] ^U cWT K]XcTS IcPcTb' P] P\T]S\T]c
c^ cWT 8^]bcXcdcX^]' P] PRc ^U 8^]VaTbb ^a P caTPch ^U cWT K]XcTS IcPcTb) ?] RPbTb fWTaT cWT K)I) Xb P _Pach' cWT K)I) _[PX]cXUU ^a STUT]SP]c R^ST cPZTb
_aTRTST]RT' P]S Q^g , ^a - bW^d[S QT \PaZTS)
9XeTabXch ^U RXcXiT]bWX_) %/& JWXb aTUTab c^ bdXcb d]STa -3 K)I)8) ,..-' fWTaT _PacXTb PaT RXcXiT]b ^U SXUUTaT]c bcPcTb) MWT] 7^g / Xb RWTRZTS' cWT
RXcXiT]bWX_ ^U cWT SXUUTaT]c _PacXTb \dbc QT RWTRZTS& %ITT ITRcX^] ??? QT[^f+ 9;@0* KJIJWFQ VZJXYNTS FHYNTSX YFPJ UWJHJIJSHJ T[JW IN[JWXNY\
HFXJX&&
444& >JXNIJSHJ #HNYN]JSXMNU$ TK <WNSHNUFQ <FWYNJX& JWXb bTRcX^] ^U cWT @I // Xb c^ QT R^\_[TcTS XU SXeTabXch ^U RXcXiT]bWX_ fPb X]SXRPcTS PQ^eT) CPaZ cWXb
bTRcX^] U^a TPRW _aX]RX_P[ _Pach)
4B& 9FYZWJ TK ?ZNY& F[PRT P] "N" X] cWT P__a^_aXPcT Q^g) ?U cWTaT PaT \d[cX_[T ]PcdaT ^U bdXc R^STb Pbb^RXPcTS fXcW cWT RPbT' _XRZ cWT ]PcdaT ^U bdXc R^ST
cWPc Xb \^bc P__[XRPQ[T) 8[XRZ WTaT U^a5 DPcdaT ^U IdXc 8^ST 9TbRaX_cX^]b)
B4& .FZXJ TK ,HYNTS& HT_^ac cWT RXeX[ bcPcdcT SXaTRc[h aT[PcTS c^ cWT RPdbT ^U PRcX^] P]S VXeT P QaXTU STbRaX_cX^] ^U cWT RPdbT) /T STY HNYJ OZWNXINHYNTSFQ
XYFYZYJX ZSQJXX IN[JWXNY\& ;gP\_[T5 K)I) 8XeX[ IcPcdcT5 /2 KI8 00. 7aXTU 9TbRaX_cX^]5 K]PdcW^aXiTS aTRT_cX^] ^U RPQ[T bTaeXRT
B44& >JVZJXYJI NS .TRUQFNSY& 8[Pbb 6RcX^]) F[PRT P] "N" X] cWXb Q^g XU h^d PaT UX[X]V P R[Pbb PRcX^] d]STa Hd[T -.' <)H)8e)F)
9T\P]S) ?] cWXb b_PRT T]cTa cWT PRcdP[ S^[[Pa P\^d]c QTX]V ST\P]STS ^a X]SXRPcT ^cWTa ST\P]S' bdRW Pb P _aT[X\X]Pah X]Yd]RcX^])
@dah 9T\P]S) 8WTRZ cWT P__a^_aXPcT Q^g c^ X]SXRPcT fWTcWTa ^a ]^c P Ydah Xb QTX]V ST\P]STS)
B444& >JQFYJI .FXJX& JWXb bTRcX^] ^U cWT @I // Xb dbTS c^ aTUTaT]RT aT[PcTS _T]SX]V RPbTb' XU P]h) ?U cWTaT PaT aT[PcTS _T]SX]V RPbTb' X]bTac cWT S^RZTc
]d\QTab P]S cWT R^aaTb_^]SX]V YdSVT ]P\Tb U^a bdRW RPbTb)
/FYJ FSI ,YYTWSJ\ ?NLSFYZWJ& 9PcT P]S bXV] cWT RXeX[ R^eTa bWTTc)
Case 2:19-cv-01814 Document 1-2 Filed 11/07/19 Page 1 of 2
To: (Defendant’s name and address) Juul Labs, Inc. f/k/a PAX Labs, Inc.; PAX Labs, Inc.; Eonsmoke LLC, Altria Group, Inc.;
Altria Client Services, Altria Group Distribution Company; Nu Mark LLC; and Nu Mark
Innovations, Ltd.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,
whose name and address are:
Derek W. Loeser
Keller Rohrback L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, WA 98101
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Case 2:19-cv-01814 Document 1-2 Filed 11/07/19 Page 2 of 2
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))
" I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)
, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or
My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ 0.00 .
Date:
Server’s signature
Server’s address