IV.5 Tietze Extension Theorem

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

IV.

5 Tietze extension theorem


Theorem 1 (Tietze Extension Theorem) Let X be a normal space and
A be a closed subset in X. If f : A → [a, b] is a continuous function, then f
has a continuous extension f : X → [a, b], i.e., f is continuous and f |A = f .
Proof. We may assume that [a, b] = [−1, 1].
Step 1.
Let g : A → [−c, c] be a continuous function. Then C = g −1 ([−c, −c/3]) and
D = g −1 ([c/3, c]) are closed in A, and hence closed in X. By Urysohn Lemma,
∃ĝ : X → [−c/3, c/3] such that ĝ(C) = −c/3 and ĝ(D) = c/3.
Note that kĝk ≤ c/3 and kg − ĝkA ≤ 2c/3.

Step 2.
Start with f : A → [−1, 1]. (c=1 in Step 1.)
Let f1 := fˆ. Then kf − f1 kA ≤ 2/3 and kf1 k ≤ 1/3.
f − f1 = f − fˆ : A → [−2/3, 2/3].
Now apply Step 1 to this function f − f1 with c = 2/3:
Let f2 := (f − f1 )ˆ . Then kf − f1 − f2 kA ≤ (2/3)2 and kf2 k ≤ 1/3 · 2/3 = 2/9.
In this way, we can obtain a sequence (fn ) with the property that
(1)kf − f1 − f2 · · · − fn kA ≤ (2/3)n
(2)kfn k ≤ 1/3 · (2/3)n−1 .

Step 3.
Let sn = f1 + f2 · · · + fn .
Then (sn ) is a Cauchy sequence in C(X, R) since
ksn − sm k = kfn+1 + · · · + fm k ≤ kfn+1 k + · · · + kfm k
≤ (1/3)((2/3)n +· · ·+(2/3)m−1 ) < (1/3)(2/3)n (1+2/3+(2/3)2 +· · · ) = (2/3)n
By the completeness of C(X, R), sn → f uniformly and f ∈ C(X, R).
Now we claim that f is a desired extension of f :
Step 2(1) ⇒ kf − sn kA ≤ (2/3)n ⇒ sn → f uniformly on A⇒ f = f on A.
Note that ksn k ≤ kf1 k + kf2 k · · · + kfn k ≤ 1/3 · (1 + 2/3 + (2/3)2 + · · · ) ≤
1/3 · 3 = 1 for all n, and hence kf k ≤ 1.

Remark sin(1/x) on (0, 1] can not be extended to [0,1].

Remark The followings are equivalent.


(i) X is normal
(ii)∀ disjoint and closed A, B ⊂ X, ∃f : X → [0, 1] s.t. f (X) = 0, f (B) = 1.

1
(iii) ∀Aclosed ⊂ X andf : A → [0, 1], ∃f : X → [0, 1], an extension of f .

Proof. ”(i)⇒(iii)” is theSTietze extension theorem.


(iii)⇒(ii): Define g : A B S → [0, 1] by g(A) = 0 and g(B) = 1. Then g is
continuous on a closed set A B and has an extension f : X → [0, 1].
(ii)⇒(i): f −1 ([0, )) and f −1 ((1 − , 1]) are disjoint open neighborhoods of A
and B respectively.

Remark In Tietze extension theorem. [a, b] can be replaced by (a, b) or R.

Proof. Let A be a closed subset of a normal space X, and let f : A → (a, b) ⊂


[a, b]. Here we may assume [a, b] = [−1, 1]. Then by Tietze extension theorem,
−1 −1
f has an extension f : X → [−1, 1] and let C1 = f (−1) and C2 = f (1).
Then C1 , C2 , and A are disjoint subsets of X and hence there exist separating
open neighborhoods V1 , V2 and W respectively. Choose open sets Ui (i=1,2)
such that Ci ⊂ Ui ⊂ Vi , and bump functions ϕi such that ϕi (Ui ) = 0 and
ϕi (Vi c ) = 1. Then ϕ1 ϕ2 f is an extension of f with the range in (−1, 1).

Theorem 2 Let X be a normal space and let A be a closed subset of X. Then


a continuous function f : A → I n = [0, 1]n has an extension defined on X.

Proof. By Tietze extension theorem fi = pi ◦ f : A → I has an extension fi


defined on X. Now f = (f1 , · · · , fn ) is an extension of f on X.

You might also like