Cattle Uterine Prolapse
Cattle Uterine Prolapse
Cattle Uterine Prolapse
The call from a farmer to replace a prolapsed uterus This article illustrates how the replacement can be
into a newly calved cow (Fig. 1) is one of those achieved quickly and safely (for the patient and
occasional tasks which the veterinary surgeon in personnel alike), with little demand for farm
practice is asked to carry out. Often the veterinary manpower. This practice adopted this technique as
surgeon on duty who is asked to attend the case will our standard at least 30 years ago and have found it
not have seen many cases themselves nor will they to be very successful. In adopting this technique,
have been actually shown how this task should be basically advocated in the literature more than 20
carried out. This 8 vet practice has only been called years ago now (Johnson, Lyons and Plenderlieth
to replace 31 prolapses in the past 12 months. It is 1986) our principal concerns were, and still remain,
therefore understandable that the task ahead is faced the welfare of the cow, the welfare of the veterinary
with some trepidation. It is usually at an unsociable surgeon and the best use of equipment and available
hour and the farmer is often not very familiar with personnel on farm.
the procedure. Coupled with that is the fact that in
this modern world there is usually an acute lack of The replacement of a fully prolapsed uterus in a cow
manpower available on farm. The replacement of a places considerable stress on the animal. The
prolapsed uterus is one of those scenarios where a inevitable straining which occurs during replacement
text book article or college lecture notes can make can be controlled to some extent by the use of
the task seem very straightforward but the reality is epidural anaesthesia, but the very removal of this
completely different! push by the cow also removes the relaxation phase
which can be utilised to advantage during the
replacement procedure. Unless the uterus is very
recently prolapsed, it becomes swollen and hardened
as well as friable, making replacement more difficult.
The fluid can be drawn out of the uterus by the use
of sugar, acting by osmosis, but this all adds to the time
required for replacement and to the stress of the cow.
As our cows get bigger, and some vets get smaller (!)
so the sheer physical effort required to present the
prolapsed mass back to the vulval lips of the cow
increases. Often there are not sufficient farm staff
available to help to support the uterus whilst
replacement is attempted. The effects of gravity and
the size of the cow combined to encourage us to
look at alternative methods of replacement. To this
end it has been suggested that the cows be cast, if not
Fig. 1: Newly calved cow with prolapsed uterus. already recumbent, and the rear end either raised on
Fig. 6: The uterus is held above the level of the vulval lips.
REFERENCES
FORMSTON, C. (1986) Uterine prolapse in the cow. Veterinary Record
118 p. 492.
JOHNSON, R. W. (1986) Uterine prolapse in the cow. Veterinary
Record 118 p. 252.
LYONS, A. R. (1986) Uterine prolapse in the cow Veterinary Record 118
p. 492.
PARKER, C. D. (1986) Uterine prolapse in the cow Veterinary Record
Fig. 9: The vulval lips are sutured.
118 p. 310.
PLENDERLIETH, R. 1986 Uterine prolapse in the cow In Practice Vol 8
p14.