0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views3 pages

Group 7

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

GROUP 7 Socio-Cultural Tradition

SOCIO-CULTURAL TRADITION  Reality is constructed through a


Jalbuena, Francis Ernest process of communicating in
Quisao, Patricia Ysabelle group, society, and cultures
Saniel, Hamfrey  Based on the premise that when
Cantara, Vince Viren people communicate they produce
Pujanes, Wilfred Benedict and reproduce culture.

SOCIO-CULTURAL TRADITION SOCIO- CULTURAL TRADITION


 Contemporary socio-cultural
This tradition focuses on patterns of theorists grants even more power
interaction between people rather than on to language.
individual characteristics or mental models.  They claim that it is through the
process of communication that
Social Interaction + Culture = “reality is produced, maintained,
SOCIO-CULTURAL repaired, and transform or stated in
the active voice, person-in-
PROPONENT conversation co-construct their own
LEV VGOTSKY (1896-1934) social worlds.
• Father of the Socio-Cultural Tradition  When these worlds collide, the
• Social interaction is the source of socio-cultural tradition offers help in
learning and development which is not bridging the culture gap that exist
found solely in the mind of an between “us” and “them”.
individual.  Interaction constructs our reality.
• Humans can be studied or understood Reality constructs our culture.
only as a part of a society, culture, or
history and not in isolation. Socio Cultural Tradition
 Interaction process and site in
which meanings, roles, rules and
Socio-Cultural Tradition cultural values are worked out.
 Two Poles have emerged within Although individuals do process
this tradition: information cognitively, this
tradition is much less interested in
MICRO COMMUNICATION AND MACRO the individual level of
COMMUNICATION communication.
 This Tradition main concern is the
interaction between micro IMPORTANCE OF CULTURE
communication and macro  Socio-culture scholars thus focus
communication practices. on how identity is negotiated from
one situation to another.
 Culture is seen as a significant part 1. SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM
of what gets made in social  From the work of George Herbert
interaction. Mead, emphasizes the idea that social
structures and meaning is created and
COMMUNICATION IN SOCIO-CULTURAL maintained within social interactions.
TRADITION  Communication is fundamental to the
 Communication in these tradition is development of the self.
typically theorized as a symbolic  The self refers to the conscious,
process that produces and reflective personality of an individual
reproduces shared socio-cultural  Group life is premised on cooperative
patterns. interaction.

• From our interaction with the community  We determine others’ intentions by


using significant symbols.
or social groups we are able to
understand the world, relate to and create BLUMER’S PRINCIPLES:
reality. In the realm of the socio- • Human beings can act towards
cultural tradition it is believed that our
identities are constructed through social the same things
interaction because the we are an • Social interaction plays a primary role.
extension of the groups we belong to.
• These meanings go through an
Socio-Cultural Tradition interpretative process done by the person
when he encounters different things.
• This tradition agrees with the Asian and MEAD’S PRINCIPLES:
Buddhist view that individuals are product
of their social –order creation. • Known for the concept ‘I’ and ‘me’

• “The Confucian view that group develop • Me – expectations and attitudes of others
• I – the person’s individuality
particular norms, rituals, and worldviews
and the idea that the social change can • Example – The looking glass self
be difficult and disruptive.”
2. SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONISM
VARIATIONS IN THE SOCIO-CULTURAL • originally called the “social
TRADITION construction of reality” after the work of
Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann,
1. SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM this line of work has been an
2. SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONISM investigation of how human knowledge
3. SOCIOLINGUISTICS is constructed through social
4. ETHNOGRAPHY interaction.
5. ETHNOMETHODOLOGY
• Based on the notion that “reality” is a that required for determining group
social construction. membership)
• Human beings actively use symbols to
5. ETHNOMETHODOLOGY
objectify, circulate, and interpret the
 Careful observation of micro behaviors in
meaningfulness of their environments
real situations.
and existence.
 Attributed to sociologist, Harold Garfinkel,
3. SOCIOLINGUISTICS this approach looks at how, in social
• Is work from the philosophy of language, interaction, we manage behaviors at
actual moments in time.
Ludwig Wittgenstein suggests that the
meaning of language depends on its use.  In communication, ethnomethodology has
influenced how we look at conversations,
• LANGUAGE GAME- language used in including the ways in which participants
ordinary life. manage the back-and-forth flow with
ExampleS: language and nonverbal behaviors.
 When you are give obey and orders
 Ask and answer questions
 Describe events
• J.L AUSTIN came to refer to the practical
use of language as speech acts.
“I am who they say I am.”
Example:
 When you speak, you are actually
performing an act.

4. ETHNOGRAPHY
 Observation of how actual social groups
come to build meaning through their
linguistic and non- linguistic behaviors.
 Looks at the form of communication used
in specific social groups, the words they
use and what these mean to the group, as
well as the meanings for a behavioral,
visual and auditory responses.
 Regards social actors as simultaneously
using multiple channels and codes to
create meaningful interaction (such as

You might also like