OJT Evaluation Form
OJT Evaluation Form
OJT Evaluation Form
below is a sample evaluation for to evaluate the implementation of sit and OJT.
It is recommended that this evaluation form be used and improved so that
appropriate areas to be evaluated are covered.
Dear Trainees:
The following questionnaire is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the
Supervised Industry Training (SIT) or On the Job Training (OJT) you had with
the Industry Partners of (your institution). Please check ( ) the appropriate box
corresponding to your rating for each question asked. The result of this
evaluation shall serve as a basis for improving the design and management of
the SIT in SICAT to maximize the benefits of the said Program. Thank you for
your cooperation.
Legend:
5 – Outstanding
4 – Very Good / Very Satisfactory
3 – Good / Adequate
2 – Fair / Satisfactory
1 – Poor / Unsatisfactory
NA – Not Applicable
Item Question Ratings
No.
INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 1 2 3 4 5 NA
1 Has (your institutional) conduction
an orientation about the SIT/OJT
program, the requirements and
preparations needed and its
experiences?
2 Has (your institution) provided the
necessary assistance such as
referrals or recommendations in
finding the company for your OJT?
3 Has (your institutions) showed
coordination with the industry
partner in the design and supervision
of your SIT/OJT.
4 Has your in-school training adequate
to undertake Industry partner
assignment and its challenges?
5 Has (your institution) monitored your
progress in the Industry?
6 Has the supervisor been effective in
achieving your OJT objectives and
providing feedback when necessary?
7 Did (your institution) conduct
assessment of your SIT/OJT program
upon completion?
8 Were you provided with the results of
the Industry and (your institution)’s
assessment of your OJT?
Comments/Suggestions:
Signature: _____________________________
Printed Name: _________________________ Qualification: _________________
Host Industry Partner: _________________ Supervisor: ___________________
Period of Training: _____________________ Instructor: ____________________
RATER A
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the X
components of CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient X
3. Objectives of every training session is well X
explained
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified X
RATER B
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the X
components of CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient X
3. Objectives of every training session is well X
explained
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified X
RATER C
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the X
components of CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient X
3. Objectives of every training session is well X
explained
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified X
Average Ratings
PREPARATION Average
1. Workshop layout conforms with the components of 2.3
CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient 3.3
3. Objectives of every training session is well explained 3
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified 3.3
GENERAL AVERAGE 2.9
Range:
0.00-1.49= Poor / Unsatisfactory
1.50-2.49=Fair / Adequate
2.50-3.49=Good / Satisfactory
3.50-4.49=Very Good / Very Satisfactory
4.50-5.0=Outstanding
General Interpretation:
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Recommendation:
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________