OJT Evaluation Form

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

The Supervised Industry Training or On the Job Training Evaluation Form

below is a sample evaluation for to evaluate the implementation of sit and OJT.
It is recommended that this evaluation form be used and improved so that
appropriate areas to be evaluated are covered.

SUPERVISED INDUSTRY TRAINING OR ON THE JOB TRAINING


EVALUATION FORM

Dear Trainees:
The following questionnaire is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the
Supervised Industry Training (SIT) or On the Job Training (OJT) you had with
the Industry Partners of (your institution). Please check ( ) the appropriate box
corresponding to your rating for each question asked. The result of this
evaluation shall serve as a basis for improving the design and management of
the SIT in SICAT to maximize the benefits of the said Program. Thank you for
your cooperation.

Legend:
5 – Outstanding
4 – Very Good / Very Satisfactory
3 – Good / Adequate
2 – Fair / Satisfactory
1 – Poor / Unsatisfactory
NA – Not Applicable
Item Question Ratings
No.
INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 1 2 3 4 5 NA
1 Has (your institutional) conduction
an orientation about the SIT/OJT
program, the requirements and
preparations needed and its
experiences?
2 Has (your institution) provided the
necessary assistance such as
referrals or recommendations in
finding the company for your OJT?
3 Has (your institutions) showed
coordination with the industry
partner in the design and supervision
of your SIT/OJT.
4 Has your in-school training adequate
to undertake Industry partner
assignment and its challenges?
5 Has (your institution) monitored your
progress in the Industry?
6 Has the supervisor been effective in
achieving your OJT objectives and
providing feedback when necessary?
7 Did (your institution) conduct
assessment of your SIT/OJT program
upon completion?
8 Were you provided with the results of
the Industry and (your institution)’s
assessment of your OJT?
Comments/Suggestions:

Item Question Ratings


No.
INDUSTRY PARTNER 1 2 3 4 5 NA
1 Was the Industry partner appropriate
for your type of training required
and/or desired?
2 Has the Industry partner designed
the training to meet your objectives
and expectations?
3 Has the Industry partner showed
coordination with (your institution) in
the design and supervision of the
SIT/OJT?
4 Has the industry partner and its staff
welcomed you and treated you with
respect and understanding?
5 Has the industry partner facilitated
the training, including the provision
of the necessary resources such as
facilities and equipment needed to
achieve your OJT objectives?
6 Has the Industry Partner assigned a
supervisor to your work or training?
7 Was the supervisor effective in
supervising you through regular
meetings, consultation and advise?
8 Has the training provided you with
necessary technical and
administrative exposure of real world
problems and practices?
9 Has the training program allowed you
top develop self-confidence, self
motivation and positive attitude
towards work?
10 Has the experience improved your
personal skills and human relations?
11 Are you satisfied with your training in
the Industry?
Comments/Suggestions:

Signature: _____________________________
Printed Name: _________________________ Qualification: _________________
Host Industry Partner: _________________ Supervisor: ___________________
Period of Training: _____________________ Instructor: ____________________
RATER A

PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the X
components of CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient X
3. Objectives of every training session is well X
explained
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified X

RATER B

PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the X
components of CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient X
3. Objectives of every training session is well X
explained
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified X

RATER C

PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the X
components of CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient X
3. Objectives of every training session is well X
explained
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified X
Average Ratings

PREPARATION Average
1. Workshop layout conforms with the components of 2.3
CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient 3.3
3. Objectives of every training session is well explained 3
4. Expected activities / outputs are clarified 3.3
GENERAL AVERAGE 2.9

Range:
0.00-1.49= Poor / Unsatisfactory
1.50-2.49=Fair / Adequate
2.50-3.49=Good / Satisfactory
3.50-4.49=Very Good / Very Satisfactory
4.50-5.0=Outstanding
General Interpretation:
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________

Recommendation:
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________

You might also like