Assignment 1

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Assignment 1 1D Transient Heat Conduction

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 502 defines the temperature criteria for protection
of structural elements for a two-hour long fire exposure of a tunnel wall to the RWS fire curve; refer to
Figure 1 and Figure 2 respectively.

Figure 1 NFPA 502 structural fire protection requirements

Figure 2 RWS fire curve

1
Assignment 1 1D Transient Heat Conduction

For a concrete lined tunnel, a thermal board is sometimes applied to the exposed surface of the concrete
to provide protection to the structure to meet the temperature requirements of NFPA 502.

Typical thermal board properties are as follows:

 Thermal conductivity, k = 0.21 W/m-K


 Heat capacity, Cp = 1100 J/kg-K
 Density = 900 kg/m3

Typical concrete properties are as follows:

 Thermal conductivity, k = 1.2 W/m-K


 Heat capacity, Cp = 1200 J/kg-K
 Density = 2000 kg/m3

The board thickness, in practical applications, is usually 25 mm. A model for one-dimensional heat transfer
into the solid has been developed to help assess fire protection requirements (refer to calculation file
CFD-01-11 for the model).

The model implements a convective boundary condition at the wall with a 25 mm board protecting the
concrete. Refer to Attachment A and the spreadsheet CFD-01-11 columns B, C and D (cells B32:D3632) for
the boundary condition implementation.

For this assignment, derive implementation of different boundary conditions and implement analysis as
described below:

1. Derive the implementation of a radiation boundary condition at the exposed face (i.e. face
exposed to the fire). Submit working and provide references to starting equations used. Use
diagrams to describe nomenclature. As part of the derivation provide a check of units to ensure
equation is correct.
2. Implement the radiation boundary condition (emissivity = 0.8) into the model; report temperature
at the board-concrete interface (i.e. 25 mm into the solid) at 3600 s and 7200 s, before and after
the radiation boundary implementation. Comment on the impact of the change in results (does
temperature increase or decrease and why).
3. Considering results from question 2; do the results (with radiation heat transfer included) suggest
(based on temperature at the concrete-board interface, maximum 380⁰C) an increase in board
thickness is needed; and what is the interface temperature (at 25 mm) after 2 hours if the board
conductivity is reduced to 0.1 W/m-K (keeping everything else the same from question 2 above)?
4. In the spreadsheet the wall temperature at the exposed face is estimated based on the
temperature at the first node in from the wall. See Attachment B. Improve this approximation by
using linear extrapolation from nodes 1 and 2. Provide the derivation of this new expression for
wall temperature. Submit working and provide references to starting equations used. Use
diagrams to describe nomenclature.

2
Assignment 1 1D Transient Heat Conduction

Total value: 10% of final grade (10 points – see below for breakdown)

Assessment:

Q1 2.5

Q2 2.5

Q3 2

Q4 2

Presentation* 1

_______________

Total 10

Work is to be conducted individually. Be descriptive as possible in your answers. Highlight results.


Organize text clearly and neatly. Clearly state all assumptions. Label and properly refer to figures, tables
and equations presented (*1% of the assignment grade is assigned for presentation). Submit your final
spreadsheet (this will not be assessed but in case of incorrect answers it will be used in consideration of
partial marks).

Due date: September 19, 2018 at 5 pm (0.5 mark deduction for each day of delayed submission)

3
Assignment 1 1D Transient Heat Conduction

Attachment A

4
Assignment 1 1D Transient Heat Conduction

5
Assignment 1 1D Transient Heat Conduction

Attachment B

You might also like