Economic-Development-Midterm-Reviewer 2
Economic-Development-Midterm-Reviewer 2
Economic-Development-Midterm-Reviewer 2
Period)
An economic model in which production
Chapter 4 functions exhibit strong complementarities
among inputs and which has broader
Binding Constraint
implications for impediments to achieving
The one limiting factor that if relaxed would be economic development.
the item that accelerates growth (or that allows a
larger amount of some other targeted outcome).
Middle-Income trap
A condition in which an economy begins
Complementarity
development to reach middle-income status but
An action taken by one firm, worker, or is chronically unable to progress to highincome
organization that increases the incentives for status. Often related to low capacity for original
other agents to take similar actions. innovation or for absorption of advanced
Complementarities often involve investments technology, and may be compounded by high
whose return depends on other investments inequality.
being made by other agents.
Underdevelopment Trap
Economic Agent
A poverty trap at the regional or national level in
An economic actor—usually a firm, worker, which underdevelopment tends to perpetuate
consumer, or government official— that chooses itself over time.
actions so as to maximize an objective; often
referred to as “agents.”
Deep intervention
Catalyst – agent of change
Microsoft – biggest producer of software A government policy that can move the economy
Apple – california to a preferred equilibrium or even to a higher
permanent rate of growth, which can then be
self-sustaining so that the policy need no longer
Coordination Failure be enforced because the better equilibrium will
then prevail without further intervention.
A situation in which the inability of agents to
coordinate their behavior (choices) leads to an
outcome (equilibrium) that leaves all agents Congestion
worse off than in an alternative situation that is
also an equilibrium. The opposite of a complementarity; an action
taken by one agent that decreases the incentives
for other agents to take similar actions.
Big Push
A concerted, economy-wide, and typically public Where-to-meet dilemma
policy–led effort to initiate or accelerate
economic development across a broad spectrum A situation in which all parties would be better off
of new industries and skills. cooperating than competing but lack information
about how to do so. If cooperation can be
achieved, there is no subsequent incentive to Agency Costs
defect or cheat. Prisoners’ dilemma
Costs of monitoring managers and other
A situation in which all parties would be better off employees and of designing and implementing
cooperating than competing, but once schemes to ensure compliance or provide
cooperation has been achieved, each party incentives to follow the wishes of the employer.
would gain the most by cheating, provided that
others stick to cooperative agreements—thus
causing any agreement to unravel. Asymmetric Information
A situation in which one party to a potential
Prisoners’ Dilemma transaction (often a buyer, seller, lender, or
borrower) has more information than another
A situation in which all parties would be better off party.
cooperating than competing, but once
cooperation has been achieved, each party
would gain the most by cheating, provided that Linkages
others stick to cooperative agreements—thus
causing any agreement to unravel Connections between firms based on sales. A
backward linkage is one in which a firm buys a
good from another firm to use as an input; a
forward linkage is one in which a firm sells to
Multiple Equilibria
another firm. Such linkages are especially
A condition in which more than one equilibrium significant for industrialization strategy when one
exists. These equilibria sometimes may be or more of the industries (product areas)
ranked, in the sense that one is preferred over involved have increasing returns to scale that a
another, but the unaided market will not move larger market takes advantage of.
the economy to the preferred outcome.
Poverty Trap
Pareto Improvement
A bad equilibrium for a family, community, or
A situation in which one or more persons may be nation, involving a vicious circle in which poverty
made better off without making anyone worse and underdevelopment lead to more poverty and
off. underdevelopment, often from one generation to
the next.
Pecuniary Externality
O-ring Production Function
A positive or negative spillover effect on an
agent’s costs or revenues. A production function with strong
complementarities among inputs, based on the
products (i.e., multiplying) of the input qualities.
Technological Externality
A positive or negative spillover effect on a firm’s Implications of the O-Ring Theory
production function through some means other
than market exchange The analysis has several important implications:
• Firms tend to employ workers with similar skills market transaction; reflects the public good
for their various tasks. characteristic of information (and susceptibility to
free riding)—it is neither fully excludable from
• Workers performing the same task earn higher
other uses, nor nonrival (one agent’s use of
wages in a high-skill firm than in a low-skill firm.
information does not prevent others from using
• Because wages increase in q at an increasing it).
rate, wages will be more than proportionally
higher in developed countries than would be
predicted from standard measures of skill. Growth Diagnostics
• If workers can improve their skill level and make A decision tree framework for identifying a
such investments, and if it is in their interests to country’s most binding constraints on economic
do so, they will consider the level of human growth.
capital investments made by other workers as a
component of their own decision about how
much skill to acquire. Put differently, when those Social Returns
around you have higher average skills, you have
a greater incentive to acquire more skills. This The profitability of an investment in which both
type of complementarity should by now be a costs and benefits are accounted for from the
familiar condition in which multiple equilibria can perspective of the society as a whole.
emerge; it parallels issues raised in our analysis
of the big push model.
CHAPTER 6: Population Growth and
• One can get caught in economy-wide, low Economic Development: Causes,
production-quality traps. This will occur when Consequences, and Controversies
there are (quite plausibly) O-ring effects across
firms as well as within firms. Because there is an • In 2013, the world’s population reached about
externality at work, there could thus be a case for 7.2 billion people. In that year, the United Nations
an industrial policy to encourage quality Population Division projected that population
upgrading, as some East Asian countries have would rise to about 8.1 billion in 2025 and reach
undertaken in the past. This could be relevant for about 9.6 billion by the year 2050.
a country trying to escape the middle-income
• Every year, more than 75 million people are
trap.
being added to the world’s population. Almost all
• O-ring effects magnify the impact of local of this net population increase 97%—is in
production bottlenecks because such developing countries.
bottlenecks have a multiplicative effect on other
• For most of human existence on earth,
production.
humanity’s numbers have been few. When
• Bottlenecks also reduce the incentive for people first started to cultivate food through
workers to invest in skills by lowering the agriculture some 12,000 years ago, the
expected return to these skills. estimated world population was no more than 5
million (see Table 6.1). Two thousand years ago,
world population had grown to nearly 250 million,
Information Externality less than a fifth of the population of China today.
From year 1 on our calendar to the beginning of
The spillover of information— such as the Industrial Revolution around 1750, it tripled
knowledge of a production process—from one to 728 million people, less than three-quarters of
agent to another, without intermediation of a the total number living in India today. During the
next 200 years (1750–1950), an additional 1.7 The growth rate of a population, calculated as
billion people were added to the planet’s the natural increase after adjusting for
numbers. But in just four decades thereafter immigration and emigration.
(1950–1990), the earth’s human population
more than doubled again, bringing the total
figure to around 5.3 billion. The world entered the Natural Increase
twenty-first century with over 6 billion people. As
seen in Figure 6.1, in 1950 about 1.7 billion The difference between the birth rate and the
people lived in developing countries, death rate of a given population.
representing about two-thirds of the world total;
by 2050, the population of less developed
countries will reach over 8 billion, nearly seven- Net International Migration
eighths of the world’s population. In the
The excess of persons migrating into a country
corresponding period, the population of the least
over those who emigrate from that country.
developed countries will increase by tenfold,
from about 200 million to 2 billion people. In
contrast, the population of the developed
countries will grow very little between now and Crude Birth Rate
2050, even accounting for immigration from The number of children born alive each year per
developing countries. 1,000 population (often shortened to birth rate).
Death Rate
The number of deaths each year per 1,000
population.
Period that a given population or other quantity The number of years a newborn child would live
takes to increase by its present size. if subjected to the mortality risks prevailing for
the population at the time of the child’s birth.
Present Value
The discounted value at the present time of a
sum of money to be received in the future.
Labor Turnover
Worker separations from employers, a concept
used in theory that the urban-rural wage gap is
partly explained by the fact that urban modern-
sector employers pay higher wages to reduce