Test 2
Test 2
Test 2
READING PASSAGE 1
If humans were truly at home under the light of the moon and stars, it would make no
difference to us whether we were out and about at night or during the day, the midnight world
as visible to us as it is to the vast number of nocturnal species on this planet. Instead, we arc
diurnal creatures, meaning our eyes are adapted to living in the suns light. This is a basic
evolutionary fact, even though mast of us don’t think of ourselves as diurnal beings any more
than as primates or mammals or Earthlings. Yet it’s the only way to explain what we’ve done
to the night: we’ve engineered it to meet our needs by filling it with light.
This kind of engineering is no different from damming a river. Its benefits come with
consequences – called light pollution – whose effects scientists arc only now beginning to
study. Light pollution is largely the result of bad lighting design, which allows artificial light
to shine outward and upward into the sky, where it is not wanted, instead of focusing it
downward, where it is. Wherever human light spills into the natural world, some aspect of
life – migration, reproduction, feeding – is affected.
For most of human history, the phrase “light pollution” would have made no sense. Imagine
walking toward London on a moonlit night around 1800, when it was one of Earth’s most
populous cities. Nearly a million people lived there, making do, as they always had, with
candles and lanterns. There would be no gaslights in the streets or squares for another seven
years.
Now most of humanity lives under reflected, refracted light from overlit cities and suburbs,
from light-flooded roads and factories. Nearly all of night-time Europe is a bright patch of
light, as is most of the United States and much of Japan. In the South Atlantic the glow from
a single fishing fleet – squid fishermen luring their prey with metal halide lamps – can be
seen from space, burning brighter on occasions than Buenos Aires.
In most cities the sky looks as though it has been emptied of stars and taking their place is a
constant orange glow. We’ve become so used to this that the glory of an unlit night – dark
enough for the planet Venus to throw shadows on Earth – is wholly beyond our experience,
beyond memory almost. And yet above the city’s pale ceiling lies the rest of the universe,
utterly undiminished by the light we waste.
We’ve lit up the night as if it were an unoccupied country, when nothing could be further
from the truth. Among mammals alone, the number of nocturnal species is astonishing. Light
is a powerful biological force, and on many species it acts as a magnet. The effect is so
2
powerful that scientists speak of songbirds and seabirds being ‘captured’ by searchlights on
land or by the light from gas flares on marine oil platforms, circling and circling in the
thousands until they drop. Migrating at night, birds are apt to collide with brightly lit
buildings; immature birds suffer in much higher numbers than adults.
Insects, of course, cluster around streetlights, and feeding on those insects is a crucial means
of survival for many bat species. In some Swiss valleys the European lesser horseshoe bat
began to vanish after streetlights were installed, perhaps because those valleys were suddenly
filled with fight-feeding pipistrelle bats. Other nocturnal mammals, like desert rodents and
badgers, are more cautious about searching for food under the permanent full moon of fight
pollution because they’ve become easier targets for the predators who are hunting them.
Some birds – blackbirds and nightingales, among others – sing at unnatural hours in the
presence of artificial light. Scientists have determined that long artificial days — and
artificially short nights — induce early breeding in a wide range of birds. And because a
longer day allows for longer feeding, it can also affect migration schedules. The problem, of
course, is that migration, like most other aspects of bird behavior, is a precisely timed
biological behavior. Leaving prematurely may mean reaching a destination too soon for
nesting conditions to be right.
Nesting sea turdes, which seek out dark beaches, find fewer and fewer of them to bury their
eggs on. When the baby sea turdes emerge from the eggs, they gravitate toward the brighter,
more reflective sea horizon but find themselves confused by artificial fighting behind the
beach. In Florida alone, hatchling losses number in the hundreds of thousands every year.
Frogs and toads living on the side of major highways suffer nocturnal fight levels that are as
much as a million times brighter than normal, disturbing nearly every aspect of their
behavior, including their night-time breeding choruses.
It was once thought that fight pollution only affected astronomers, who need to see the night
sky in all its glorious clarity. And, in fact, some of the earliest civic efforts to control fight
pollution were made half a century ago to protect the view from Lowell Observatory in
Flagstaff, Arizona. In 2001 Flagstaff was declared the first International Dark Sky City. By
now the effort to control fight pollution has spread around the globe. More and more dues
and even entire countries have committed themselves to reducing unwanted glare.
Questions 1-7: Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading
Passage 1 ?
1. Few people recognise nowadays that human beings are dosigned to function best in
daylight.
2. Most light pollution is caused by the direction of artificial lights rather than their intensity.
3. By 1800 the city of London had such a large population, it was already causing light
pollution.
4. The fishermen of the South Atlantic are unaware of the light pollution they are causing.
5. Shadows from the planet Venus are more difficult to see at certain times of year.
6. In some Swiss valleys, the total number of bats declined rapidly after the introduction of
streetlights.
7. The first attempts to limit light pollution were carried out to help those studying the stars.
Questions 8-13
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer. Write your
answers in boxes 8-13 on your answer sheet.
Songbirds and seabirds The worst-affected birds are those which are
seabirds 8 ………………….. They bump into 9 ……………….. which stand out at night.
Desert rodents and badgers They are more at risk from 10 …………………
READING PASSAGE 2
A. The space around us affects us profoundly – rebuilding of one south London school as a
striking emotionally, behaviourally, cognitively. In Britain that example of how building
design can affect human space is changing at a pace not seen for a generation. behaviour
positively. Before its redesign, it was Surely psychology has something to say about all
ranked as the worst school in the area – now it is this change. But is anyone listening? ‘There
is a huge recognised as one of the country’s twenty most amount of psychology research that
is relevant, but improved schools. At the moment we’re talking to ourselves,’says
Chris Spencer, professor of environmental psychology at the University of Sheffield. Spencer
recalls a recent talk he gave in which he called on fellow researchers to make a greater effort
to communicate their findings to architects and planners. ‘I was amazed at the response of
many of the senior researchers, who would say: “I’m doing my research for pure science, the
industry can take it or leave it”. But there are models of how to apply environmental
psychology to real problems, if you know where to look Professor Frances Kuo is an
example.
B. Kuo’s website provides pictures and plain English ” The collaborative project currently
summaries of research conducted by her Human stands as a one-off experiment. ” Among
these is trainee architects will now go away with some a study using police records that found
inner-city surrounded by more vegetation suffered 52 per cent fewer crimes than apartment
blocks with little or no greenery. Frances Kuo and her co-researcher William Sullivan believe
that greenery reduces crime – so long as visibility is preserved – because it reduces
aggression, brings local residents together outdoors, and the conspicuous presence of people
deters criminals.
D. Uzzell has been involved in a pioneering project between MSc students in England and
Scotland. Architecture students in Scotland acted as designers while environmental
psychology students in England acted as consultants, as together they worked on a
community project in a run-down area of Glasgow. The psychology students encouraged the
5
architecture students to think about who their client group was, to consider issues of
crowding and social cohesion, and they introduced them to psychological methodologies, for
example observation and interviewing local residents about their needs.’ The collaborative
project currently stands as a one-off experiment. ‘Hopefully these trainee architects will now
go away with some understanding of the psychological issues involved in design and will
take into account people’s needs,’ says Uzzell.
E. Hilary Barker, a recent graduate in psychology, now works for a design consultancy. She’s
part of a four- person research team that contributes to the overall work of the company in
helping clients use their office space more productively. Her team all have backgrounds in
psychology or social science, but the rest of the firm consists mainly of architects and interior
designers. ‘What I do is pretty rare to be honest,’ Barker says. ‘I feel very privileged to be
able to use my degree in such a way.’ Barker explains that the team carries out observational
studies on behalf of companies, to identify exactly how occupants are using their building.
The companies are often surprised by the findings, for example that staff use meeting rooms
for quiet, individual work.
F. One area where the findings from environment- behaviour research have certainly
influenced building is in hospital design. The government has a checklist of criteria that must
be met in the design of new hospitals, and these are derived largely from the work of the
behavioural scientist Professor Roger Ulrich,’ Chris Spencer says. Ulrich’s work has shown,
for example, how the view from a patient’s window can affect their recovery. Even a
hospital’s layout can impact on people’s health, according to Dr John Zeisel. ‘If people get
lost in hospitals, they get stressed, which lowers their immune system and means their
medication works less well. You might think that way-finding round the hospital is the
responsibility of the person who puts all the signs up, but the truth is that the basic layout of a
building is what helps people find their way around,’ he says.
G. Zeisel also points to the need for a better balance between private and shared rooms in
hospitals. ‘Falls are reduced and fewer medication errors occur’ in private rooms, he says.
There’s also research showing how Important it is that patients have access to the outdoors
and that gardens in hospitals are a major contributor to well-being. However, more generally,
Zeisel shares Chris Spencer’s concerns that the lessons from environmental psychology
research are not getting through. ’There is certainly a gap between what we in social science
know and the world of designers and architects,’ says Zeisel. He believes that most
industries, from sports to film- making, have now recognised the importance of an evidence-
based approach, and that the building trade needs to formulate itself more in that vein, and to
recognise that there is relevant research out there. ‘It would be outrageous, silly, to go ahead
with huge building projects without learning the lessons from the new towns established
between 30 and 40 years ago,’ he warns.
Questions 14-20: Reading Passage 2 has seven paragraphs. A-G. Choose the correct heading
for A-G from the list of headings below.
6
List of Headings
14. Paragraph A
15. Paragraph B
16. Paragraph C
17. Paragraph D
18. Paragraph E
19. Paragraph F
20. Paragraph G
Which TWO of the following benefits are said to arise from the use of environmental
psychology when planning buildings?
Which TWO of the following research methods are mentioned in the passage?
A. the use of existing data relating to a geographical area
B. measuring the space given to a variety of activities
C. watching what people do in different parts of a building
7
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer. Write your
answers in boxes 25 and 26 on your answer sheet.
25. The students from England suggested that the Scottish students should identify their
……………….
26. John Zeisel believes that if the of a building is clear, patient outcomes will improve
………………….
READING PASSAGE 3
Our ancestor, Homo erectus, may not have had culture or even language, but did they have
teenagers? That question has been contested in the past few years, with some anthropologists
claiming evidence of an adolescent phase in human fossil.This is not merely an academic
debate. Humans today are the only animals on Earth to have a teenage phase, yet we have
very little idea why. Establishing exactly when adolescence first evolved and finding out
what sorts of changes in our bodies and lifestyles it was associated with could help us
understand its purpose.Why do we, uniquely, have a growth spurt so late in life?
Until recently, the dominant explanation was that physical growth is delayed by our need to
grow large brains and to learn all the behaviour patterns associated with humanity – speaking,
social interaction and so on. While such behaviour is still developing, humans cannot easily
fend for themselves, so it is best to stay small and look youthful.That way your parents and
other members of the social group are motivated to continue looking after you.What’s more,
studies of mammals show a strong relationship between brain size and the rate of
development, with larger-brained animals taking longer to reach adulthood. Humans are at
the far end of this spectrum. If this theory is correct, and the development of large brains
accounts for the teenage growth spurt, the origin of adolescence should have been with the
evolution of our own species (Homo sapiens) and Neanderthals, starting almost 200,000
years ago. The trouble is, some of the fossil evidence seems to tell a different story.
The human fossil record is extremely sparse, and the number of fossilised children
minuscule. Nevertheless, in the past few years anthropologists have begun to look at what can
be learned of the lives of our ancestors from these youngsters. One of the most studied is the
famous Turkana boy, an almost complete skeleton of Homo erectus from 1.6 million years
ago found in Kenya in 1984. Accurately assessing how old someone is from their skeleton is
8
a tricky business. Even with a modern human, you can only make a rough estimate based on
the developmental stage of teeth and bones and the skeleton’s general size.
If Anton is right, that theory contradicts the orthodox idea linking late growth with
development of a large brain. Anthropologist Steven Leigh from the University of Illinois
goes further. He believes the idea of adolescence as catch-up growth does not explain why
the growth rate increases so dramatically. He says that many apes have growth spurts in
particular body regions that are associated with reaching maturity, and this makes sense
because by timing the short but crucial spells of maturation to coincide with the seasons when
food is plentiful, they minimise the risk of being without adequate food supplies while
growing.What makes humans unique is that the whole skeleton is involved. For Leigh, this is
the key.
Another approach, which has produced a surprising result, relies on the minute analysis of
tooth growth. Every nine days or so the growing teeth of both apes and humans acquire
ridges on their enamel surface.These are like rings in a tree trunk: the number of them tells
you how long the crown of a tooth took to form. Across mammals, the rate at which teeth
develop is closely related to how fast the brain grows and the age you mature. Teeth are good
indicators of life history because their growth is less related to the environment and nutrition
than is the growth of the skeleton.
A more decisive piece of evidence came last year, when researchers in France and Spain
published their findings from a study of Neanderthal teeth. Neanderthals had much fester
tooth growth than Homo erectus who went before them, and hence, possibly, a shorter
childhood. Lead researcher Fernando Ramirez-Rozzi thinks Neanderthals died young – about
25 years old — primarily because of the cold, harsh environment they had to endure in
9
27. In the first paragraph, why does the writer say ‘This is not merely an academic
debate’?
Questions 31-36: Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in
Reading Passage 3?
10
31. It is difficult for anthropologists to do research on human fossils because they are so rare.
32. Modern methods mean it is possible to predict the age of a skeleton with accuracy.
33. Susan Anton’s conclusion about the Turkana boy reinforces an established idea.
34. Steven Leigh’s ideas are likely to be met with disbelief by many anthropologists.
35. Researchers in France and Spain developed a unique method of analysing teeth.
36. There has been too little research comparing the brains of Homo erectus and
Neanderthals.
Questions 37-40: Complete each sentence with the correct ending, A-G, below. Write the
correct letter, A-G, in boxes 37-40 on your answer sheet.
37. Until recently, delayed growth in humans until adolescence was felt to be due to
…………….
38. In her research, Margaret Clegg discovered ……………….
39. Steven Leigh thought the existence of adolescence is connected to …………………
40. Research on Neanderthals suggests that they had short lives because of ………………….
ANSWER
1. TRUE
2. TRUE
3. FALSE
4. NOT GIVEN
5. NOT GIVEN
6. FALSE
7. TRUE
8. immature
9. brightly lit buildings
10. predators
11. nesting condition
12. dark beaches
13. (major) highways
14. vii
15. i
16. x
17. ix
18. iii
19. iv
20. vi
21. B
22. D
23. A
24. C
25. client group
26. (basic) layout
27. D
28. A
29. B
30. D
31. YES
32. NO
33. NO
34. YES
35. NOT GIVEN
12