Silo Chimney Tower
Silo Chimney Tower
Silo Chimney Tower
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Concrete Silo / Chimney / Tower Design Based on ASCE 7-16, ACI 318-19 & ACI 313-16
INPUT DATA
BIN DEPTH H= 150 ft, (45.72 m)
BIN OUTSIDE DIAMETER dia = 30 ft, (9.14 m)
BIN CONCRETE THICKNESS t= 12 in, (305 mm), at bottom
[ 8 in, (203 mm), at top ]
FOOTING DIAMETER D= 61 ft, (18.59 m)
FOOTING THICKNESS T= 48 in, (1219 mm)
SOIL DEPTH TO BOTTOM Hp = 24 in, (610 mm)
WT OF BIN MAX CONTENTS Wbin = 5763.44 kips, (25637 kN), (input zero for chimney)
DESIGN SUMMARY
FOOTING 61 ft DIA x 48 in THK. w/ # 10 @ 14" o.c. EACH WAY, AT TOP & BOT.
CONCRETE BIN 12 in THK. w/ # 8 @ 12 in o.c.DOWEL / VERT. BARS AT AT EACH FACE
BIN HORIZONTAL # 6 @ 12 in o.c. AT EACH FACE, AND (11) - STANDS @ 24 in. (610 mm), o.c. (THE SECTION UNCRACKED.)
ANALYSIS
DETERMINE LATERAL LOADS
F = Max (0.8 S1 I / R , 0.03) W / 1.4 = 0.10 W , ASD (ASCE 7-16 15.4.1.2)
Fcap = 0.10 Wcap = 18.96 kips, at top
Fbin & wall = 0.10 (Wcap + Wwall) = 783.78 kips, at 2/3 H
Where S1 = 0.55 (from soil report, ASCE 7-16, 11.4.1)
I = 1.00 (ASCE 7-16 15.4.1.1)
R = 3 (ASCE 7-16 Table 15.4-2)
Wwall = 1718.06 kips
COMBINED LOADS AT TOP FOOTING (2018 IBC 1605.3.2 & ACI 318-19 5.3)
CASE 1: DL + LL P = 7662 kips 1.2 DL + 1.6 LL Pu = 11500 kips
M = 0 ft-kips Mu = 0 ft-kips
e = 0.0 ft, fr cl ftg eu = 0.0 ft, fr cl ftg
CASE 2: DL + LL + E / 1.4 P = 7662 kips 1.2 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 E Pu = 8042 kips
M = 81221 ft-kips Mu = 113710 ft-kips
e = 10.6 ft, fr cl ftg eu = 14.1 ft, fr cl ftg
CASE 3: 0.9 DL + E / 1.4 P = 5350 kips 0.9 DL + 1.0 E Pu = 5350 kips
M = 63222 ft-kips Mu = 88511 ft-kips
e = 11.8 ft, fr cl ftg eu = 16.5 ft, fr cl ftg
(cont'd)
CHECK OVERTURNING FACTOR AT FOOTING EDGE BOTTOM (2018 IBC 1605.2.1, 1808.3.1, & ASCE 7-16 12.13.4)
MR / MO = 3.4 > 1.5 [Satisfactory]
Where MO = M+VT= 84432 k-ft , MR = S(W) 0.5 D = 287186 k-ft
Wftg = (0.15 kcf) T D2 p / 4 = 1753.48 kips, footing weight.
[Satisfactory]
1 Vu, (k / ft) 0.0 -26.2 -39.0 -31.5 -20.1 6.9 20.1 31.5 39.0 26.2 0.0
Case Mu, (ft-k / ft) 0.0 74.4 74.2 85.2 105.9 133.4 163.6 190.4 203.6 184.0 0.0
2 Vu, (k / ft) 0.0 4.8 -0.6 6.2 14.6 32.8 40.9 46.7 47.5 -4.8 0.0
Case Mu, (ft-k / ft) 0.0 55.8 72.5 100.2 136.9 180.0 226.2 270.8 307.1 322.9 0.0
3 Vu, (k / ft) 0.0 3.6 4.2 9.7 16.0 28.5 33.4 36.6 35.9 -3.6 0.0
CHECK FLEXURE
Location Mu,max d (in) r min rreqD rmax smax rprovD
Top Slab 322.9 ft-k / ft 45.37 0.0019 0.0030 0.0243 no limit 0.0020
Bottom Slab -705.0 ft-k / ft 44.37 0.0019 0.0070 0.0243 18 0.0020 [Satisfactory]
2 e f C
'
fy ty , for compression controlled
o , ty , t
Ec Es ty 0.003 , for tension controlled
'
E c 57 f C , E s 29000ksi , e 0.85 , cu 0.003
4
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
-1
4
(cont'd)
3
Note:
1. Between compression & tension controlled is
2 Transition, which the f should be by linear
interpolation. (ACI 318-19 Tab. 21.2.2 & Fig. R10.4.2.1)
f Pn (k) 1 2. ACI 318-19 changed f (Fig.R21.2.2b) and keeps
be (22.2.2.4.1) and ecu (Fig. R21.2.2a) the same.
0
But AISC 360/341-16 has different f (0.9 only) and
0 5 10 15 20 25 be (1.0 or 0.7).
-1
Pu = 8042 kips
Mu = 113710 ft-kips, max at bottom
(from load combinations)
f Mn (ft-k) Solid Black Line - Tension Controlled
Solid Red Line - Transition
Dash Line - Compression Controlled
f Pmax =0.85 f [ 0.85 fc' (Ag - Ast) + fy Ast] = 34748 kips., (at max axial load, ACI 318-19 22.4.2)
where f = 0.70 (ACI 318-19 21.2.2) > Pu [Satisfactory]
Ag = 13119 in . 2
in . 2 Ast = 47.40 in . 2
provided
CHECK DOWEL DEVELOPMENT '
fc
[Satisfactory]
where Bar size # 8
db = 1 in
r required / r provided = 1 ( A s,reqd / A s,provd , ACI 318-19 25.4.10)
fy = 60 ksi
f'c = 5 ksi
yt = 1.0
ye = 1.0 (1.2 for epoxy-coated, ACI 318-19 25.4.2.4)
ys = 1.0 (0.8 for # 6 or smaller, 1.0 for other)
l = 1.0
h = 0.7 (#11 or smaller, cover > 2.5" & side >2.0", ACI 318-19 25.4.2.3)