ForesightReport PDF

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/315786958
Food systems and diet quality (contributor)
Chapter · September 2016
CITATIONS READS
0 1,597
1 author:
Lukasz Aleksandrowicz
Wellcome
35 PUBLICATIONS 1,075 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Million Death Study View project
Sustainable and healthy diets View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Lukasz Aleksandrowicz on 05 April 2017.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Food systems
and diets:
Facing the challenges
of the 21st century
September 2016
Food systems
and diets:
Facing the challenges
of the 21st century
This report includes important recommendations and advice for leaders at the most senior
levels in countries and international organizations. It is also of direct relevance to all policy
makers, decision makers, professionals, business people, experts and researchers with interests
in food systems and diets. Many of these individuals will be directly concerned with the
production, processing, trade, regulation, supply and safety of food. However, others may work
in wider areas of policy and business, for example relating to: public health and well-being,
mental health development, education, economic development, urbanization, globalization
and demography.
Food systems and diets: Facing the challenges of the 21st century 3
Copyright © 2016 by the Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition.
RECOMMENDED CITATION: Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition. 2016. Food systems and diets:
Facing the challenges of the 21st century. London, UK.
This report may be freely reproduced, in whole or in part, provided the original source is acknowledged. This publication is
a product of the Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition and was authored by the Foresight Project’s
Lead Expert Group, supported by the Panel Secretariat. This publication was peer reviewed. The findings, interpretations,
conclusions, advice and recommendations expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations
or the governments the Global Panel members represent.
ISBN 978-0-9956228-0-7
4
Global Panel members:
John Kufuor, (Co-Chair) Sir John Beddington, Akinwumi Adesina, Tom Arnold, Director
Former President of Ghana (Co-Chair) President, African General, Institute of
Former UK Government Development Bank (AfDB) International and
Chief Scientific Adviser European Affairs (IIEA)
José Graziano da Silva, Agnes Kalibata, Rachel Kyte, Special Maurício Antônio
Director General, Food and President, Alliance Representative of the Lopes, President, Brazilian
Agriculture Organization of for a Green Revolution UN Secretary General for Agricultural Research
the United Nations (FAO) in Africa (AGRA) Sustainable Energy; and Corporation (Embrapa)
CEO of Sustainable Energy
for All (SE4All)
Rhoda Peace Tumusiime, Srinath Reddy, President, Emmy Simmons, Board

Commissioner for Rural Public Health Foundation Member, Partnership to
Economy and Agriculture, of India Cut Hunger and Poverty in
African Union Commission Africa/AGree
5
Preface
The Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition commissioned this Foresight report in 2015 to
take a close look at the extent to which food systems are delivering healthy diets today and to assess whether they
are fit for the future.
While the focus has been on low- and middle-income countries, the findings constitute a stark warning for all
countries. Despite past progress, approximately three billion people across the globe now have low-quality diets.
Nearly a quarter of all children under five years of age are stunted, more than two billion people have insufficient
micronutrients and the incidence of overweight and obesity is growing in every region. As a result, many economies
are seriously underperforming, and diet-related chronic diseases are placing ever-greater demands on health care
systems. Moreover, the situation is set to worsen dramatically over the next 20 years as powerful drivers of change
such as population growth, climate change and urbanization converge on food systems.
This report shows that unless policy makers act decisively to control overweight, obesity and diet-related disease
and accelerate efforts to reduce undernutrition, all countries will pay a heavy price in terms of mortality, physical
health, mental well-being, economic losses and degradation of the environment. The stark message to world
leaders is that only a response on the scale and commitment used to tackle HIV/AIDS and malaria will be sufficient
to meet the challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It is also essential that the public and
private sectors work together to achieve this.
This report shows how these considerable challenges can be addressed. In particular, food systems need
to be harnessed so that they nourish rather than merely feed people. This alone will open up countless opportunities
for interventions that decision makers can tailor to specific situations. The report also sets out clear priorities for
action at national and international levels, as well as detailed advice and guidance, which will be of practical and
immediate use to decision makers.
On behalf of the Global Panel, we would like to take this opportunity to express our sincere thanks to the
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the UK Department for International Development who together have
funded this groundbreaking study. We would also like to thank the group of leading experts, chaired by Professor
Lawrence Haddad, who undertook much of the work and drafted this report, the many other experts and policy
makers from across the world who contributed, and the team at the Global Panel Secretariat who managed the
entire process.
John Kufuor Sir John Beddington

(Co-Chair) (Co-Chair)
Former President of Ghana Former UK Government
Chief Scientific Adviser
6
Foreword
Malnutrition has for too long been a neglected issue. Yet it is a problem that affects one in three people worldwide.
Today, 159 million children are stunted, 50 million are wasted and more than two billion people are overweight
or obese. But in 2015 for the first time in history, through the Global Goals, the world has committed to ending
malnutrition in all its forms. As the 2016 Global Nutrition Report makes clear, tackling malnutrition is one of the
largest challenges facing all countries. Malnutrition comes in many guises: stunting, wasting, deficiencies of
essential vitamins and minerals, and obesity. Reaching the ambitious target of ending malnutrition is only
achievable if world leaders can ensure agriculture and food systems policies strengthen nutrition outcomes.
There is a moral imperative to eliminate malnutrition. Undernutrition contributes to 45% of the 16,000 children
under the age of five who die every day. The impacts extend well beyond health: stunted children who survive are
permanently disadvantaged, perform worse at school and are robbed of future earnings that could support them
and their families. But eliminating malnutrition is also an economic imperative. The costs of undernutrition in
terms of lost national productivity are significant, with between 3% and 16% of GDP lost annually in Africa and
Asia. The good news is that we know that the economic returns from investing in nutrition are high – GBP 16
generated for every pound invested. Boosting nutrition can boost growth.
This Foresight report from the Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition on the future of diets
provides fresh insights into changes in diets across the world. It highlights the impact of major drivers of change
in dietary patterns, including population growth, rising incomes, urbanization and globalization. The report
complements the 2016 Global Nutrition Report in delivering strong evidence to underpin policy change. The
data presented here focus on the challenges that decision makers face when attempting to integrate nutrition
within current food systems and agricultural policies. It sets out ways to approach these challenges so that policies
are shaped in a way that delivers healthy, safe and nutritious diets for all.
The Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition was first launched by the former UK Secretary of
State for International Development at the 2013 Nutrition for Growth Summit. It has proven invaluable for
championing the role of agriculture and food systems in preventing malnutrition. The Panel and its work –
including this report – are an important contribution to the UK Government’s commitment to improve the
nutrition of 50 million people by 2020.
Ridding the world of malnutrition will require sustained investment, drive and energy. It will also require innovative
solutions that work to tackle both undernutrition and the rising burden of obesity afflicting almost all countries
around the world. I urge nutrition and agriculture leaders in governments, business and civil society to act on the
Foresight report findings.
James Wharton MP
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State
Department for International Development
7
Acknowledgements
The Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition Mr Marc Van Ameringen, Executive Director, Global Alliance
would like to thank the Project’s Lead Expert Group who oversaw for Improved Nutrition (GAIN); Ms Robynne Anderson,
the technical aspects of the Project, who were involved in much of President, Emerging Ag. Inc.; Ms Anne Heughan, Formerly
the work and in producing the Project outputs and in drafting this External Affairs Director, Nutrition and Health at Unilever;
report. They were led by Professor Lawrence Haddad. Dr Oliver Oullier, Head of Strategy, Global Health and
Healthcare Industries, Member of the Executive Committee,
The Global Panel is also grateful to the many individuals and World Economic Forum, Geneva; Ms Hilary Parsons, Global
organizations from across the world who were involved in the Senior Public Affairs Manager, Nestlé; Mr Stuart Ponder, Senior
detailed technical work and the Project’s advisory bodies – some of Vice-President EMEA, INTL STONE; Dr Howard Shapiro, MARS
these are specifically mentioned below. The Global Panel would also Inc., Chief Agricultural Officer, Mars Advanced Research Institute
like to thank the Representatives of the Global Panel members, the Fellow, MARS, Inc.; Ms Anna Swaithes, Director of Sustainable
many other individuals from organizations across the world who Development, SABMiller; Mr Julian Walker-Palin, Managing
contributed views and advice, attended workshops in Africa, Asia and Director, ETANTE; Dr Derek Yach, Chief Health Officer, The
Europe, peer reviewed individual papers, and provided other support. Vitality Group.
Project Lead Expert Group Reviewers of commissioned evidence papers

Professor Lawrence Haddad, (Chair), Senior Research Fellow, and the final report
International Food Policy Research Institute; Co-Chair of the Global Professor Per Pinstrup-Andersen, H. E. Babcock Professor
Nutrition Report’s Independent Expert Group; Professor Corinna of Food, Nutrition and Public Policy, Cornell University;
Hawkes, Director of The Centre for Food Policy, City University; Dr Fenton D Beed, Regional Director, East and Southeast Asia/
Co-Chair of the Global Nutrition Report’s Independent Expert Oceania, World Vegetable Center; Professor Geoff Dixon,
Group; Professor Jeff Waage OBE, Director, London International Visiting Professor Agriculture Building, University of Reading;
Development Centre; chair of Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Professor Jessica Fanzo, Director, Global Food Ethics and Policy
Research on Agriculture and Health (LCIRAH); and technical adviser Program, Johns Hopkins University; Professor Sheryl Hendriks,
to the Global Panel; Professor Patrick Webb, Professor of Nutrition Director of the Institute for Food, Nutrition and Well-being at
Science and Policy, Tufts University; policy and evidence adviser the University of Pretoria; Ms Anne Heughan, Formerly External
to the Global Panel; Professor Charles Godfray CBE FRS, Hope Affairs Director, Nutrition and Health at Unilever; Professor
Professor, University of Oxford; Dr Camilla Toulmin, Senior Fellow, Eileen Kennedy, Dean Emeritus and Professor, Friedman School
International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University; Ms Mary
Mpereh, Ghana National Development Planning Commission;
Authors and other contributors of the evidence reviews Professor Bhavani Shankar, Professor of International Food,
commissioned by the lead expert group Agriculture and Health, School of Oriental and African Studies
Mr Lukasz Aleksandrowicz, PhD Candidate, London School (SOAS) London; Dr Emorn Udomkesmalee, Associate
of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Dr Phillip Baker, Research Professor, Mahidol University, Thailand; Co-Chair of the Global
Fellow, Australian National University; Ms Komal Bhatia, Data Nutrition Report’s Independent Expert Group; Dr Steven
Analyst, Global Nutrition Report, Institute for Global Health, Wiggins, Researcher, Overseas Development Institute (ODI);
University College London; Dr Giuseppe Carrus, Associate Ms Laura Wellesley, Research Associate, The Royal Institute of
Professor, Università Roma Tre; Ms Kamilla Gehrt Eriksen, Data International Affairs.
Analyst, Global Nutrition Report; Dr Tara Garnett, Director, Food
Climate Research Network, University of Oxford; Ms Samyuktha Global Panel Secretariat
Kannan, MS Applied Economics, Cornell University; Professor Professor Sandy Thomas, Director; Professor Jeff Waage
William Masters, Friedman School of Nutrition, Tufts University; OBE, Director, London International Development Centre;
Ms Birgit Meade, Agricultural Economist, United States Dept. of Chair of Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on
Agriculture, Economic Research Service; Dr Andrew Muhammed, Agriculture and Health (LCIRAH); and Technical Adviser
Chief, International Demand and Trade Branch, United States to the Global Panel; Professor Patrick Webb, Professor
Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; Ms Stephanie of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University; Policy and
Myers, Systems Administration, United States Dept. of Agriculture, Evidence adviser to the Global Panel; Ms Shodona Kettle,
Economic Research Service; Professor Sabine Pirchio, Sapienza Foresight Project Manager; Ms Fernanda Marrocos Leite
University of Rome; Mr Alejandro Nin Pratt, Research Fellow, Villamarin, Foresight Project Assistant (Research); Ms Catherine
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Dr Roseline LeBlanc, Assistant to the Director; Ms Deirdre McMahon,
Remans, Associate Research Scientist, Agriculture and Food Researcher; Ms Manuela Puricelli, Communications Assistant;
Security Center, Earth Institute, Columbia University; Dr Marco Ms Christina Spencer, Coordinator.
Springmann, Researcher, James Martin Fellow, University of
Oxford; Ms Mehroosh Tak, PhD Candidate, Leverhulme Centre for Global Panel consultants
Integrative Research in Agriculture and Health (LCIRAH), SOAS; Mr Derek Flynn, Foresight Project Consultant; Dr Darren
Ms Suzanne Thornsbury; Branch Chief – Crops, United States A Hughes, Consultant; Mr Michael Reilly, Research Manager,
Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service. Kent Business School; Mr Jon Parke, International Programmes
Consultant.
Private sector workshop
8
10 Chapter 1: The central role of high-quality diets and food systems in ending malnutrition in all its forms
Contents
Preface 6
Foreword 7
Acknowledgements 8
List of abbreviations 11
List of figures/tables/boxes 12
Executive summary 15
1: The central role of high-quality diets and food systems in ending malnutrition in all its forms 23
2: W
hat is a high-quality diet? 31
3: How diets are changing 43
4: F orecasting changes in food availability 59
5: Why are diets changing? 69
6: F ood systems and diet quality 81
7: Policies and tools for diet-friendly food systems 97
8: A call to action 113
References 118
Appendices 128
1: Table 1.1 Recent reports on food systems: Aims and key messages 128
2: Table 3.1 Initiatives to improve food consumption quality and availability 129
3: Table 3.2 ‘Healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ categories used by Imamura et al. (2015) and what they mean 130
4: T able 3.3 Definitions of categories of processed foods, non-alcoholic beverages and ultra-processed foods used in Chapter 3 131
5: Table 6.1 The world’s top 25 food and non-alcoholic beverage companies (2003, 2010 and 2015) 132
List of abbreviations
AgMIP Agricultural Model Intercomparison and IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development
Improvement Project IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute
ASF animal source foods MAD minimum acceptable diet
BaU business as usual MDD minimum diet diversity
CGIAR Consortium of International Agriculture NCDs non-communicable diseases
Research Centers
PAHO Pan American Health Organization
CHD coronary heart disease
SDGs Sustainable Development Goals
DALYs disability-adjusted life years
SSA sub-Saharan Africa
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
TFP total factor productivity
of the United Nations
UN United Nations
FBDGs food-based dietary guidelines
WDDS women’s dietary diversity score
FDI foreign direct investment
WFP United Nations World Food Programme
GAIN Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition
WHA World Health Assembly
GDP gross domestic product
WHO World Health Organization
GNP gross national product
WTO World Trade Organization
HDDS household diet diversity score
List of figures
Figure 1.1: Different forms of malnutrition Figure 4.1: Undernourishment in the base year and projections
to 2030 in the business-as-usual (BaU) scenario, FAO
Figure 1.2: Six of the top 11 risk factors driving the global burden
of disease are related to diet Figure 4.2: Growth in per capita daily caloric intake (2005/
2007-2030): Low- and middle-income countries and high-income
Figure 1.3: The multiple burdens of malnutrition faced by
countries
countries
Figure 4.3: Growth in per capita daily caloric intake (2005/2007-
Figure 1.4: Conceptual framework for the links between diet
2030): Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia
quality and food systems
Figure 4.4: Growth in per capita daily caloric intake (2005/2007-
Figure 2.1: What 83 national food-based dietary guidelines
2030): East Asia and Latin America
recommend
Figure 4.5: Projections of sales per capita of processed foods,
Figure 2.2: The global burden of foodborne disease (total DALYs)
non-alcoholic beverages and ultra-processed foods and beverages
by hazard groups, 2010
to 2035 in countries at different levels of income
Figure 2.3: The global burden of foodborne disease (DALYs per
Figure 4.6: Trends in the numbers of men and women affected
100,000 population) by hazard groups and by subregion, 2010
by obesity: 1980–2010
Figure 2.4: The food system’s contribution to total global energy
Figure 4.7: Deaths avoided by applying dietary guidelines for
consumption and greenhouse gas emissions
fruits and vegetables, red meat and energy intake to food
Figure 2.5: Indices of average energy use, blue-water footprint availability data (compared to 2050 FAO projections) by region
and greenhouse gas emissions per calorie of food for each food
Figure 4.8: Deaths avoided by applying dietary guidelines for fruits
group, US data
and vegetables, red meat and energy intake to food availability
Figure 2.6: The water-use consequences of different diets in the data (compared to 2050 FAO projections) – selected countries
EU-28 countries
Figure 5.1: Projected annual growth rate (%) of real per capita
Figure 3.1: Intake of key foods and diet components by region, 2013 GDP by region, 2015–30
Panel A Panel B
Figure 5.2: Global poverty projections with different assumptions
Figure 3.2: Changes in intake of key foods and diet components about the inclusivity of growth
by region, 1990–2013 (%) Panel A Panel B
Figure 5.3: Projected changes in population, 2015–50
Figure 3.3: Consumption of foods and other diet components
Figure 5.4: Profile of female deaths by age, low-income countries
by national income group, 2013
Figure 5.5: Urban percentage of overall population by region,
Figure 3.4: Percentage of infants aged 0–5 months who are
1950–2050
exclusively breastfed by region, around 2000 and 2012
Figure 6.1: Conceptual framework for the links between diet
Figure 3.5: Percentage of women aged 15–49 years who gave
quality and food systems
birth in the last three years who consumed various food groups
in the day or night preceding the survey, DHS surveys 2007–10 Figure 6.2: Percentage of household value of food consumed
by source of acquisition
Figure 3.6: Trends in per capita sales volumes of non-alcoholic
beverages, processed foods and ultra-processed foods by country Figure 6.3: Percentage of energy from non-staple foods and total
income group, 2000–15, with 15-year average growth rates shown dietary energy per capita by region, 1961–2011
Figure 3.7: Total change (percentage) in sales of processed foods Figure 6.4: Global per capita availability per day (kcal) from
(kg/capita per year), by country income group, 2010–15 different foods: 1961, 1986 and 2011
Figure 3.8: Per capita sales volumes of non-alcoholic beverage Figure 6.5: East Asia, 1961–2011, calories from different categories
categories by region, 2000–15
Figure 6.6: CGIAR research funding allocated to specific crops in
Figure 3.9: Percentage of monetary value of food consumed from 2012 (in US$ million)
different categories: Ethiopia 2004/2005, Uganda 2009/2010,
Figure 6.7: Per capita food losses and waste at consumption and
Tanzania 2010/2011, Mozambique 2008/2009, Malawi 2001/2011,
pre-consumption stage, in different regions
South Africa 2010
Figure 6.8: Coca Cola’s international investments
Figure 3.10: Consumption of (Panel A) fruits and vegetables and
(Panel B) sodium in relation to WHO recommended levels
12 List of figures
List of figures continued
Figure 6.9: Total processed food distribution by modern vs. Figure 7.1: Changes in food demand in calories for select
traditional channels in country income groups, 2001–2014 food groups (f&v, pulses, meat) by 2050 (percentage change
calculated as a percentage of total retail value from reference)
Figure 6.10: Fresh food distribution by modern vs. traditional Figure 7.2: Changes in food demand in calories for select
retail channels by country income groups, 2006–14, calculated food groups (food oils, sugar) by 2050 (percentage change
as a percentage of total volume from reference)
Figure 6.11: Estimated average annual price change from 1990 Figure 7.3: Six steps to identify policy actions to achieve
in five countries healthy diets
List of tables
Table 2.1: UN guidance on diet quantity and quality for Table 6.3: Examples of food safety risks in the food supply
vulnerable groups subsystem
Table 3.1: Dietary risks considered in the Global Burden Table 7.1: Policy options in the agricultural subsystem
of Disease study
Table 7.2: Policy scenarios: Productivity
Table 3.2: The percentage of infants and young children meeting
Table 7.3: Policy options in the food storage, transport and
WHO minimum recommended standards for diet in low- and
trade subsystem
middle-income countries
Table 7.4: Policy options in the food transformation subsystem
Table 5.1: Challenges and opportunities faced by consumers
arising from urbanization Table 7.5: Policy scenarios: Taxes
Table 5.2: Contextual driver types and priorities for food Table 7.6: Policy options in the food retail and provisioning
system goals subsystem
Table 6.1: Examples of food supply systems elements that have Table 7.7: Aligning actions across food supply subsystems to
the potential to influence diet quality via food environments create healthier food environments for higher-quality diets
Table 6.2: Food loss and waste along the value chain
List of boxes
Box 2.1: World Health Organization (WHO) guidance Box 5.1: Underlying driver typologies and the dietary challenges
on healthy diets they generate
Box 2.2: Agents which cause foodborne disease Box 6.1: Price volatility and diet quality
Box 2.3: Elements of a high-quality diet Box 7.1: The Global Panel’s ‘top 10’ recommendations
Box 3.1: Diet and food intake: Data challenges Box 7.2: Urban farming: The potential positives for diet quality
Box 3.2: The rise of highly processed foods in Southern Box 7.3: Modelling the impact of increasing agricultural
and Eastern Africa productivity of healthier foods
Box 3.3: A summary of diet data Box 7.4: Modelling the effect of health-related food taxes on
diet quality
Box 4.1: Animal source foods: The challenge of hitting the
healthy range Box 7.5: Illustrative examples of using the food systems tool
to identify effective actions to improve diet quality
Box 4.2: Fruits and vegetables: Shifting the projections
14 Introduction: Achieving diets in the 21st century
Executive summary
The world is facing a nutrition crisis: approximately three billion

people from every one of the world’s 193 countries have low-quality
diets. Over the next 20 years, multiple forms of malnutrition will
pose increasingly serious threats to global health. Population
growth combined with climate change will place increasing stress
on food systems, particularly in Africa and Asia where there will
be an additional two billion people by 2050. At the same time,
rapidly increasing urbanization, particularly in these two regions,
will affect hunger and nutrition in complex ways – both positively
and negatively.
Unless policy makers apply the brakes on overweight, obesity and
diet-related disease and accelerate efforts to reduce undernutrition,
everyone will pay a heavy price: death, disease, economic losses and
degradation of the environment. A response, equivalent to that
marshalled to tackle HIV/AIDS, malaria and smoking is needed to
meet these challenges.
Around the world, coordinated action needs to be accompanied by
fundamental shifts in our understanding and in our policy actions.
Much more emphasis must be given to positioning agricultural
growth as a way to improve diet quality, rather than merely
delivering sufficient calories. Food systems need to be repositioned
from just supplying food to providing high-quality diets for all. This
will require policy initiatives far beyond agriculture to encompass
trade, the environment and health, which harness the power of the
private sector and empower consumers to demand better diets.
This report is a call to action for world leaders and their governments.
Leadership and commitment will be essential in driving forward
the decisions set out in this report and in delivering the necessary
priority actions to reshape the global food system.
1. KEY FINDINGS
1.1 A growing nutritional crisis in 2015). Most of the reductions in calorie insufficiency will
come from Asia, while Africa will see a levelling off. But if
The world has made substantial progress in reducing hunger nothing is done, Asia and Africa will still be grappling with
and undernutrition in the past 25 years. Global rates of hunger significant levels of undernutrition in 14 years’ time.
have fallen and now affect around one in ten people1 and the
percentage of children who are chronically undernourished Together, these facts offer up a formidable warning to
has declined to around one in four.2 Such progress means less policy makers. Immediate and decisive action is needed to
suffering, lower mortality rates and improved life chances for address the challenges that they pose to avert the profound
hundreds of millions of families and their children. consequences for the health of populations, health care costs
and economic growth.
However, despite these gains, malnutrition in all its forms
currently affects one in three people worldwide, far beyond
the 795 million who experience hunger on a daily basis. And 1.2 Malnutrition represents the number one risk
the situation is rapidly getting worse. Over the next 20 years, factor in the global burden of disease
multiple forms of malnutrition will pose increasingly serious
challenges to policy makers: The impacts of malnutrition are huge. An estimated 45%
of deaths under age five are linked to undernutrition and
• Today, the prevalence rates of overweight, obesity and suboptimal breastfeeding alone is responsible for almost 12%
diet-related chronic diseases such as diabetes3 and of total deaths,4 mostly in low-income countries. Malnutrition
hypertension are increasing in every region and most rapidly has many causes and a low-quality diet is one of them.
in low- and middle-income countries. In sub-Saharan African
men, the growth rate of overweight and obesity now exceeds Malnutrition associated with diets that are not nutritious or
that for underweight. For South Asian women, the prevalence safe represents the number one risk factor in the global burden
of overweight and obesity is almost the same as the prevalence of disease. These low-quality diets contain insufficient calories,
of underweight. In China, the combined rate of overweight vitamins and minerals or contain too many calories, saturated
and obese adults is projected to rise to over 50% by 2030. fats, salt and sugar. The risk that poor diets pose to mortality and
morbidity is now greater than the combined risks of unsafe sex,
• Nearly a quarter of all children under five years of age today are alcohol, drug and tobacco use (see Fig.1).
stunted, with diminished physical and mental capacities. Less
than a third of all young infants in 60 low- and middle-income Poor nutrition amplifies the health consequences of diseases
countries are meeting the minimum dietary diversity standards such as HIV/AIDS, malaria and measles. In economic terms,
needed for growth. And undernourished mothers are having across Africa and Asia, the estimated impact of undernutrition
babies who will be left with life-long impairments. on gross domestic product (GDP) is 11% every year — more than
the annual economic downturn caused by the global financial
• More than two billion people lack vital micronutrients crisis of 2008–10.5
(e.g., iron, zinc, vitamin A) which affects their health and
life expectancy. For example, in low- and middle-income
countries, over half of the young women and adolescent girls 1.3 Food systems are not delivering healthy diets
surveyed are not meeting their micronutrient needs. By 2050,
the estimated impact of elevated carbon dioxide on the zinc Today’s food systems are too focused on food quantity and not
content of grains, tubers and legumes could place 138 million enough on quality. They are not helping consumers to make
people at new risk of zinc deficiency – with 48 million in healthy and affordable food choices consistent with optimal
India alone. nutrition outcomes. In fact, the trend is in the opposite direction.
The multiple forms of malnutrition will not diminish unless
Looking to the future, if the direction of current policies remains policy makers and private sector business leaders work together
the same, then estimates suggest that by 2030, the number to reshape food systems in ways that will advance the goal of
of overweight and obese people will have increased from 1.33 healthier diets for all.
billion in 2005 to 3.28 billion, around one third of the projected
global population. This is a major concern as no country to date Over recent decades, agricultural productivity has risen, food
has successfully reversed growth in obesity once it has been trade has increased and the once ever-present threat of famine
allowed to develop. At the same time, there will still be 653 has receded in most parts of the world. This means many people
million calorie-deficient people (down from 795 million have better diets than before. But the rate of increase of intake
FAO, IFAD and WFP (2015a)

1
IFPRI (2016a)
2 3
In this report we refer to "diabetes" to generally mean type 2 diabetes Black et al. (2013)
4 5
IFPRI (2016a)
16 Executive summary
FIGURE 1: Six of the top 11 risk factors driving the global burden of disease are related to diet
■ Disease risk factors linked to diet ■ Disease risk factors not linked to diet
Dietary risks
High systolic blood pressure
Child and maternal malnutrition
Tobacco smoke
Air pollution
High body mass index
Alcohol and drug use
High fasting plasma glucose
Unsafe water, sanitation and handwashing
Unsafe sex
High total cholesterol
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000
Global all-age disability-adjusted life years (in thousands, 2013)
Source: Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators (2015), Figure 5

Note: The graph shows global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributed to level 2 risk factors in 2013 for both sexes combined.
of foods that undermine diet quality has been increasing even 1.4 The importance of a food system approach
faster. For example, in 2000, sales of ultra-processed foods and
beverages in the upper-middle-income countries were one- Policy makers need to ensure that all parts of food systems
third of those in the high-income countries. Fifteen years later, work together to deliver high-quality diets (see Box 1). This
they were more than half. So while there have been dietary means thinking well beyond agriculture to also consider the
improvements, the net result is still low-quality diets. many processes and activities involved in food production,
processing, storage, transportation, trade, transformation
As this report shows, rising incomes alone will not improve and retailing. This amounts to a change in mindset, and a
the quality of people’s diets. As incomes increase, food scarcity fundamental shift in approach. Whatever progress is made
diminishes but the cost of many nutritious foods remains high towards food security, unless foods reach people in a form
and the ability to purchase foods that do not support high- that is nutritious and affordable, the problem of poor-quality
quality diets increases. Currently, income growth is a double- diets will not be solved.
edged sword when it comes to improving diets.
Food systems are changing rapidly with important consequences
for changing diets. The food chains that supply consumers are
Box 1: What is a high-quality diet? growing longer, with global trade increasing the distance between
production and consumption, as well as the diversity of foods
While there is no universal ‘diet quality index’, there is available to consumers. Value and power in food systems is
general agreement on what a healthy or high-quality shifting towards the middle of these food chains, with agricultural
diet should include, i.e. a diversity of foods that are safe produce becoming ingredients for processed products. Decisions
and provide levels of energy appropriate to age, sex, by large agri-businesses, manufacturers and retailers are playing
disease status and physical activity as well as essential a growing role, relative to the public sector, in the availability,
micronutrients. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) affordability, safety and desirability of foods. Policy makers need
definition of a healthy diet emphasizes the importance of to ensure that food system changes like these contribute to, and
starting healthy eating habits in early life (notably through do not detract from, high-quality diets.
breastfeeding) and limiting the intake of free sugars and
salt. It advises people to eat plenty of fruits and vegetables, The bottom line is that food systems are failing us. Those who
wholegrains, fibre, nuts and seeds, while limiting free would benefit from consuming more animal source foods, fruits,
sugars, sugary snacks and beverages, processed meats and vegetables and pulses often find them unaffordable. Others who
salt, and replacing saturated and industrial trans fats with need to reduce their consumption of red meat may be unable to
unsaturated fats. switch to other sources of flesh-based food such as fish.
In the longer term, food systems will be subject to major stresses The good news is that there are many ways in which policy
resulting from important external influences (see Box 2). makers can reshape food systems. Extending policy action
Population growth, climate change, and increased competition beyond agriculture to the entire food system opens up many
for natural resources are notable examples. But others such opportunities to improve the consumer’s ability to access food
as income growth, urbanization and globalization of diets are that is safe, nutritious and affordable. The full Foresight report
likely to have mixed effects – with both positive and negative provides detailed guidance on the many options available to
consequences for diets. It is essential that policy makers think policy makers to allow them to act now on their own food
through the consequences of all of these drivers of change for systems, to help address diet-quality-driven malnutrition crises
their own food systems. in their countries.
Box 2: Long-term drivers of the nutrition crisis
Food system policies must be developed which are resilient safety risks, they have potentially good access to fresh produce
to future long-term threats and uncertainties – examples and products fortified with micronutrients. The challenge
of these are listed below. Action is needed now since some is to find ways of strengthening the positive links between
policies and initiatives may take many years or decades to urbanization and diet quality while maintaining its ability to
take full effect, e.g. restructuring food systems, investing in help reduce hunger and undernutrition
infrastructure and influencing consumer attitudes.
Income growth
Changes in the size and age distribution of populations Countries cannot expect to ‘grow’ their way out of poor diet
Population growth rates are decelerating as declining birth quality and address the multiple forms of malnutrition. While
rates catch up with declining mortality rates. But global food income growth among low-income consumers will help to
systems will need to provide high-quality diets to more than reduce undernutrition, it will also create substantial new
two billion additional people by 2050. Over a billion will be in problems relating to overweight and obesity and associated
Africa. A particular effort is needed to improve diets of infants non-communicable diseases (NCDs).
and young children to support their cognitive development
and to enable them to capitalize on work opportunities. Globalization of diets
A focus on improving the nutrition of adolescent girls and Diets, even in the poorest countries, are increasingly affected
women of child-bearing age will also be required. by the growing global nature of food trade and trade-related
industries. Globalization can act to increase resilience by
Climate change allowing deficits in one region to be met by others but it
By 2050, there could be over half a million net additional can also decrease resilience by propagating systemic shocks.
deaths from diet-related causes compared to a scenario with But globalization may also have helped to drive the obesity
no climate change – most would occur in low- and middle- epidemic by making it easier for consumers to make low-
income countries. Both direct and indirect effects (e.g. due to quality diet choices.
a rise in energy costs) need to be considered when developing
climate-smart policies. Competition for natural resources
This will increasingly constrain food production, but could also
Rapid urbanization stimulate technical progress. Overall, it could drive diets in
Urban populations are growing most rapidly in Africa and unpredictable and highly context-specific ways. The growing
Asia. Urban dwelling is associated with less undernutrition consensus on the need to price scarce resources, such as water
than rural populations but more diet-related obesity and and carbon storage, should provide strong incentives both
chronic disease, and greater risks from food price volatility. to increase efficiency of resource use and generate technical
While the urban poor experience low-quality diets and food improvements.
In economic terms across Africa and Asia, the estimated impact

of undernutrition on gross domestic product (GDP) is 11% every year.
2. A CALL TO ACTION
2.1 Nutrition – a new global priority FIGURE 2: Six steps to identify policy actions to
achieve healthy diets
Agriculture and food systems must deliver much more than food
– they need to fulfil their potential to underpin the health and
well-being of populations. At a fundamental level, consumers are
making food choices that are not consistent with good nutrition,
STEP ONE: Set a clear diet quality objective
health and well-being. And public policies or private sector
actions are not adequately aligning food systems toward the What is/are the diet quality gap/s that need
goal of improving nutrition. to be addressed and who does it affect?
However, the long path that high-income countries have taken

to try and manage rising obesity rates has not succeeded. That
same path is not an inevitable one for low- and middle-income
countries. There are alternatives, provided the right choices are STEP TWO: Engage with communities to explore
made now and throughout the food system. The challenge for perceptions of causes of the diet gap
policy makers in low- and middle-income countries is to find more
direct and less damaging dietary pathways from where their diets What might be responsible for the diet gap from the
are today, to where they need and want to be. South Korea is a perspective of the consumer? Availability? Affordability?
good example of a country that has gone from low- to middle- to Appeal? Or factors outside the food system?
high-income levels in the past 30 years in a way that has supported
the supply of relatively accessible and affordable high-quality diets.
It is no coincidence that this country has implemented many food
system policies that aim to promote health.
STEP THREE: Review the role of food systems
At a global level, stakeholders need to prioritize the
improvement of nutrition – and the consumption of If and what elements of food systems are responsible
the healthy diets that promote it. While the Sustainable for the diet gaps from the local to the global level?
Development Goals have put ending hunger, achieving food
security, improving nutrition and promoting sustainable
agriculture high on the global agenda, the 2016–2025 UN Decade
of Action on Nutrition provides many potential opportunities to
place the improvement of diet quality through food systems at STEP FOUR: Identify actions for food systems solutions
the centre of global action.
What are available options in the food system
The international community needs to step up and accord for addressing the diet gaps?
the goal of healthy diets to all, and extend the same level
of focus and commitment that it gave to addressing HIV/
AIDS, malaria and smoking. This will require stakeholders from
governments, civil society, the media, business and research to
work together to make improving dietary quality a sustained STEP FIVE: Align actions to create coherence
political priority.
What further actions are needed to align
At the national level, governments and private sector actors these options across the food system?
need to work together to focus on aligning individual food
systems with the goal of attaining healthy diets and improved
nutritional outcomes. This will require, amongst other actions,
creating incentives for private sector actors throughout the food
system so that they can make decisions more favourable to the STEP SIX: Leverage actions for sustainability
adoption of higher-quality diets.
How can these actions also be leveraged to
It will be critical for governments to look across both food improve food systems sustainability?
system objectives and broader goals and constraints including
the need to build sustainability into the country’s agricultural
system, conserving limited water supplies and promoting long-
term management of soils, forests and biodiversity. In particular,
careful consideration needs to be given to the relationships 5 Make fruits, vegetables, pulses, nuts and seeds much more
between diets that are high-quality from a nutritional available, more affordable and safe for all consumers.
perspective, and their potential impacts on the environment. They offer considerable benefits in terms of diet quality.
These are more complex than popularly assumed and are likely There are opportunities throughout the food system to
to differ considerably in different contexts. overcome supply-side barriers to make them available,
affordable and appealing. Public policy can also incentivize
Effective evidence-based policy making should be supported greater investment in the infrastructure required to produce,
by the use of appropriate analytical tools. Figure 2 sets out six store and transport these foods.
sequential steps that policy makers need to work through. The
full report provides detailed guidance for each step, together with 6 Make policies which regulate product formulation,
advice concerning promising policy actions to improve diets. These labelling, advertising, promotion and taxes a high
relate to the various parts of the food system, from production to priority. These are needed to create disincentives for
storage, transport, trade, transformation and retailing. companies to allocate resources to forms of processing that
undermine diet quality. Policies to educate consumers of the
adverse health effects of consuming these products more
2.2 Specific priorities for action than occasionally, are also needed.
Policy makers and other key decision makers need to work 7 Improve accountability at all levels. Governments
throughout the food system to effect diet change. committed to reshaping food systems toward healthy
diets need to set targets and publish transparent scorecards
While most actions will depend heavily on local contexts, of their results. Private sector actors should acknowledge
the following are universally applicable: their far-reaching roles in defining food environments – and
the nutritional quality of foods and other products that they
1 F ocus food and agriculture policies on securing diet promote to consumers. Civil society organizations need to
quality for infants and young children. These are woefully monitor the performance of others.
inadequate in many countries. Improved policy choices are
needed which recognize the centrality of high-quality diets 8 B
reak down barriers associated with the longstanding
for the youngest. division of jurisdictional responsibilities within many
governments – between agriculture, health, social
2 Improve adolescent girls and adult women’s diet quality protection and commerce. These can fundamentally
as a priority in all policy making that shapes food impede integrated action across food systems, inhibit the
systems. Women are particularly vulnerable to the health effective allocation of resources and create barriers that
impacts of low-quality diets because of their higher nutrition inhibit access to data.
requirements and because of their disempowerment in some
cultures. 9 Institutionalize high-quality diets through public
sector purchasing power. Food provided in schools,
3 Ensure that food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) guide hospitals, across the armed forces and in the prison
policy decisions to reshape food systems. FBDGs are largely system should be of the highest dietary benefit to the
absent in low-income countries (present only in 2 out of 31) consumer. This approach has the potential to shape the
and limited in lower-middle-income countries (12 out of 51). norms around foods that contribute to high-quality diets
They are needed to inform and to influence food policies and incentivize suppliers and contractors to align their
around the world. value chains accordingly.
4 Animal source foods (ASF) (e.g. dairy, eggs, fish and meat) 10 Refocus agriculture research investments globally
provide important nutrients. Policy support for these to support healthy diets and good nutrition (see Box 3).
foods should be pragmatically evidence-based rather Global and national public research organizations (and their
than driven by ideology. Infants, children, adolescents and funders) must rebalance their priorities to reflect a priority
women of reproductive age living in low-income contexts focus on high-quality diets. Much more investment
will find it extremely hard to meet nutrient requirements in in research on fruits and vegetables, animal source
the absence of these foods. At the same time, some groups in foods, legumes, nuts and seeds is urgently required.
low-income contexts are consuming levels of these foods in Better national-level and subnational data are needed on
excess of recommended levels. diet, consumer food prices, food safety, food loss and waste.
The Access to Nutrition Index that assesses the conduct
and performance of companies should be strengthened
at the country level.
Box 3: Research priorities
Research on food, agriculture and nutrition must dietary database. Recent efforts to gather data such as the
be refocused on achievement of healthy diets Global Dietary Database (GDD) and FAO/WHO GIFT (FAO/
The international and national agricultural research WHO Global Individual Food Consumption data Tool), being
communities should play a strong leadership role in developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the
promoting research that addresses productivity, profitability, United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization
sustainability and nutritional goals at the same time. (WHO), should be built upon.
A ‘high-quality diet’ lens must guide a rebalancing
of funding allocations across the food system. Many other indicators for the food system also need to
be collected, for example on food quality and safety to help
Metrics for diet quality and the food system need policy makers understand the links between food systems and
to be modernized actual nutritional outcomes.
They are also needed to enable policy makers to monitor
the implications of dietary choices for the future of the More and better evaluation
environment. Policy makers need to be able to assess the effect that
specific interventions and policy actions have on diet quality
More and better data and to determine how they could be improved. For example,
Effort is urgently needed to substantially improve the quantity recent work to track changes in the purchases of sugar-
and quality of dietary data. Few national governments collect sweetened beverages in Mexico following imposition of a
the data required to inform decision makers about what new tax, sheds important light on consumer choices in a
people actually eat and the UN has no functioning global changing food environment.
This report highlights the very serious challenges facing This report shows that current
policy makers today and in the future. Already, approximately
three billion people on the planet – from every country – have trends do not have to persist
low-quality diets.
if the right actions are taken
But this report also shows that current trends do not have to
persist if the right actions are taken now and in the coming now and in the coming decades.
decades. Better diets are possible. Ensuring that all people eat
healthily is a moral and economic imperative. This will require
Better diets are possible.
focused, determined and sustained action from policy makers
working in partnership with the private sector in complex and
rapidly changing environments. With so much at stake, we all
share a responsibility to find solutions that work for everyone.
There are many public policy opportunities to act on in the food
system beyond agriculture to improve the consumer’s ability
to access food that is safe, nutritious and affordable.
The central role of
high-quality diets
and food systems in
ending malnutrition
in all its forms
• Despite progress, much of the world does not eat high-quality
diets – of all risk factors, diet is responsible for the largest burden
of global ill health and needs immediate and urgent attention
by policy makers.
• Many countries are experiencing a “double burden” of both

undernutrition and overweight:
– An estimated 45% of deaths of children under five are
linked to malnutrition and the economic consequences
KEY MESSAGES
of undernutrition represent losses of gross domestic product

of 10%, year in and year out.
– Adult obesity rates are increasing in all 193 countries –
if current trends continue, the combined number of
overweight and obese adults will increase from 1.33 billion
in 2005 to 3.28 billion in 2030.
• Food systems are key to improving diets, but are under increasing
pressure due to diverse factors such as population growth,
urbanization and the uncertainties induced by climate change.
• This report provides clear and practical advice on how policy makers
in all countries can address the challenges facing their populations –
by changing how we think about food systems and diet quality, and
through the many possible interventions in food systems.
1 The central role of high-quality diets and food systems
in ending malnutrition in all its forms
This report addresses the question: “What decisions do Diet quality matters because low-quality diets are linked to a range
policy makers need to take in the coming decade to ensure of malnutrition and health outcomes, including: stunting, wasting,
that food systems deliver high-quality diets to people in low- and micronutrient deficiencies, overweight and obesity, diet-related,
middle-income countries by 2035?” By high-quality diets, we chronic, non-communicable diseases (NCDs), high blood pressure
mean diets that eliminate hunger, are safe, reduce all forms of and high cholesterol (Figure 1.1). These forms of malnutrition that
malnutrition and promote health. High-quality diets are adequate, are associated with inadequacy on the one hand and excess on the
diverse and balanced. It is important that high-quality diets are other, collectively characterize the “double burden” of malnutrition
produced without undermining the environmental basis for around the world. While low-quality diets are just one cause of this
generating high-quality diets for future generations. double burden, they are an important one.
FIGURE 1.1: Different forms of malnutrition
Child stunting Child wasting Child overweight Adult overweight

Carrying excess body fat with
Low height for age Low weight for height High weight for height a body mass index ≥ 25
Fe
Micronutrient deficiency Adult obesity Non-communicable diseases
Iron, folic acid, vitamin A, zinc, Carrying excess body fat with
Diabetes, heart disease and
iodine below healthy thresholds a body mass index ≥ 30
some cancers
Source: 2016 Global Nutrition Report (IFPRI, 2016a)
1.1 The problem of malnutrition and low-quality diets
The world has made substantial progress in reducing hunger and of all young infants are meeting minimum standards for diet
undernutrition in the past 25 years. Global rates of hunger have diversity. In six sub-Saharan countries, more than half of all women
declined from 18.6% in 1990 to 11.8% in 20126 and the percentage surveyed did not consume any legumes, nuts, vitamin A-rich
of children who are stunted has fallen from 39.6% to 23.8%. 7 This fruits and vegetables, dairy or eggs in the day before the survey.10
progress means less suffering, lower mortality rates and improved For adults, obesity rates are increasing in all 193 countries.11
life chances for hundreds of millions of families and their children.
For these people, improvements in the quantity and quality of New data from the 2015 Global Burden of Disease study12
diets have played a key role in these achievements, along with show that much of the world does not eat high-quality
a wide range of additional factors such as poverty reduction, diets13 and that diet, of all risk factors, is responsible for the
improvements in agricultural productivity and expanded access largest burden of global ill health (Figure 1.2). And this is an
to improved basic education, clean water and sanitation, health underestimate. As the study notes: “If one were to quantify the
care and effective nutrition interventions.8 There have also been contribution of diet mediated through weight gain and body
declines in mortality from heart disease in high-income countries, mass index (BMI), the overall effect of diet would be much larger
with some positive trends in some low- and middle-income than is estimated here.” A similar argument could be made for
countries, although the picture is very mixed.9 the contribution of poor diets to child and maternal malnutrition
and all the other risk factors (highlighted in green) in Figure 1.2.
But, as this report will show, diet quality is an area that requires Diet is an important factor in every region. For example, the
far greater attention. For example, in the 60 low- and middle- 2015 Global Burden of Disease study shows that six of the top
income countries for which recent data exist, only about a third 11 risk factors are diet related.
FIGURE 1.2: Six of the top 11 risk factors driving the global burden of disease are related to diet
■ Disease risk factors linked to diet ■ Disease risk factors not linked to diet
Dietary risks
High systolic blood pressure
Child and maternal malnutrition
Tobacco smoke
Air pollution
High body mass index
Alcohol and drug use
High fasting plasma glucose
Unsafe water, sanitation and handwashing
Unsafe sex
High total cholesterol
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000
Global all-age disability-adjusted life years (in thousands, 2013)
Source: Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators (2015), Figure 5
Note: The graph shows global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributed to level 2 risk factors in 2013 for both sexes combined.
In Nigeria, the number of adults In Ethiopia, the corresponding

with type 2 diabetes is estimated numbers will also double:
to double between 2011 and 2030: from 1.4 million to 2.7 million.
from 3.1 million to 6.1 million.
FAO, IFAD and WFP (2015a) 7IFPRI (2016a) 8See for example: O'Donnell, Nicolás and Doorslaer (2009); Monteiro et al. (2009); Headey et al. (2015); Headey and
6
Hoddinott (2014); Haddad et al. (2014); IFPRI (2015b); IFPRI (2015c). 9Critchley et al. (2016) 10See Chapter 3 for details. 11IFPRI (2016a) 12Global Burden of
Disease Study 2013 Collaborators (2015) 13Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators (2015)
FIGURE 1.3: The multiple burdens of malnutrition faced by countries19
Under-five stunting Adult overweight

Ethiopia, Rwanda Honduras, Nicaragua
Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Albania, Armenia, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Barbados, Argentina,
Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Botswana, Ecuador, Belarus, Belize, Bolivia, Bosnia Australia, Brazil,
Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Egypt, Equatorial and Herzegovina, Brunei Chile, Colombia,
Comoros, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Guinea, Guatemala, Darussalam, Dominican Costa Rica,
People’s Republic of Korea, Democratic Haiti, Iraq, Lesotho, Republic, El Salvador, Gabon, Germany, Mexico,
Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Eritrea, Libya, Namibia, Papua Georgia, Guyana, Iran, Paraguay, Peru, FYR
Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, India, New Guinea, Solomon Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Macedonia, Tonga,
Indonesia, Kenya, Lao People’s Democratic Islands, South Africa, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, USA, Uruguay
Republic, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Swaziland, Syria, Mongolia, Montenegro,
Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Tajikistan, Vanuatu, Morocco, Oman, Panama,
Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Yemen Republic of Moldova, Saint
Philippines, Sao Tome and Principe, Sierra Lucia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia,
Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Togo, Seychelles, Suriname, Tunisia,
Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Turkey, Uzbekistan,
Zambia, Zimbabwe Venezuela
Women's anemia Ghana, Japan, Senegal, Sri Lanka, Thailand China, Republic of
Korea, Vietnam
Source: 2016 Global Nutrition Report, Table A1.1 (IFPRI, 2016a)
Low-quality diets contribute to three very troubling nutrition trends.

Box 1.1: Projections for overweight, obesity and
• First, undernutrition and hunger are declining very slowly in diabetes to 2030
some regions. In sub-Saharan Africa, the number of stunted
children is 58 million and is rising by 500,000 every year and • Globally, if current trends continue, the combined
while the total is decreasing in Asia, the numbers remain very number of overweight and obese adults will increase from
high at 91 million.14 Undernutrition contributes to a high 1.33 billion in 2005 to 3.28 billion in 2030.17
mortality burden. The joint effects of foetal growth restriction,
suboptimal breastfeeding, stunting, wasting and vitamin A and • In China, the combined rate of overweight and obese
zinc deficiencies for children under five, result in 45.4% of all adults has risen from 14.6% in 1992 to 32.3% in 2012 and
deaths worldwide in this age group. Suboptimal breastfeeding is projected to increase to 51.2% by 2030.18
alone is responsible for 11.6% of total deaths.15
• In Nigeria, the number of adults with diabetes is estimated
• Second, rates of overweight, obesity and diet-related non- to double between 2011 and 2030: from 3.1 million to 6.1
communicable diseases such as diabetes are increasing in all million. In Ethiopia, the corresponding numbers will also
regions and most rapidly in low- and middle-income countries. nearly double: from 1.4 million to 2.7 million.19
For example, for sub-Saharan African men, the growth rate of
overweight and obesity now exceeds that for underweight. For • By 2030, Bangladesh will have more adults with diabetes
South Asian women, the prevalence of overweight and obesity is than Mexico or Indonesia.21
almost the same as the prevalence of underweight.16 Projections
of these indicators suggest the situation is going to get much
worse by 2030 (Box 1.1). overweight (labelled in white in Figure 1.3). When malnutrition
is considered in all its forms, it is responsible for serious public
• Third, many countries (57 of the 129 for which data are available) health problems in nearly every country on earth, directly
experience significant levels of both undernutrition and affecting one in three people.
IFPRI (2016a) 15Black et al. (2013) 16NCD-RisC (2016) 17Kelly et al. (2008) 18Zhu et al. (2016) 19Whiting et al. (2011) 20Whiting et al. (2011)
14
The cut-offs for placing countries in each indicator category are as follows: Under-age-five stunting ≥ 20%, women of reproductive age anaemia ≥
21
20% and adult overweight ≥ 35%. These cut-offs were selected because they are considered to indicate public health significance by the World Health
Organization (WHO, 2010). Full results appear in Appendix Table A1.1 of the Global Nutrition Report 2016.
These trends are troubling because they are damaging and once 45% of deaths of children under five are linked to malnutrition.22
established, difficult to reverse. The various manifestations of The economic consequences of undernutrition represent losses
malnutrition have profound impacts on lives and livelihoods of gross domestic product (GDP), year in and year out, of 10% –
throughout people’s lifetimes and from generation to generation. far greater than the annual percentage loss in world GDP due to
Undernourished children are less likely to survive to see their fifth the global financial crisis in the period 2008–10.23 Estimates of the
birthday, less likely to stay in school, less likely to escape poverty economic consequences of nutrition-related, non-communicable
as adults and are more vulnerable to the onset of chronic and diseases (NCDs) are also large. In China, for example, people
non-communicable diseases later in life. If they are females, they diagnosed with diabetes face an annual 16.3% loss of income.24
are more likely to give birth to malnourished babies. Estimates of The consumption of high-quality diets is central to reversing these
these effects are striking. As previously mentioned, an estimated three very troubling trends.
1.2 The role of food systems
This report focuses on the key role of food systems in improving shaping people’s food preferences, attitudes and beliefs and food
diet quality. As Figure 1.4 shows, diet quality is influenced by cultures more broadly.25 Food environments are in turn influenced
consumer purchasing power. But the way income is expended by broader food systems, which themselves are affected by many
is in turn influenced by ‘food environments’, which provide the drivers of change. Food systems present many opportunities
options from which people make decisions about what to eat, – many hardly yet tried – to improve diets. The potential is
circumscribe how income can be spent on food and contribute to enormous and provides much cause for optimism.
FIGURE 1.4: Conceptual framework for the links between diet quality and food systems
Drivers of food systems
su pply system
Food
Agricultural
production
Food Food storage,
transport and
subsystem environment trade subsystem
Consumer
Nutrient Preferences Time
quality & Food
taste of labelling
Diet
available quality
food
Knowledge
Physical Purchasing
access power Food
to food promotion
Food retail and Food
provisioning Food transformation
subsystem price subsystem
Source: Compiled by the authors
Black et al. (2013)

22
Horton and Steckel (2013); IFPRI (2015a); United Nations (2016b)
23
Liu and Zhu (2014)
24
Herforth and Ahmed (2015); Hawkes et al. (2015)
25
However, increasing pressures from population growth, rapid
urbanization and the uncertainties induced by climate change
Food systems need to be
all present challenges and opportunities for food systems. Policy
makers already have a key role in addressing these pressures
repositioned: from feeding
on food systems. In addition, policy plays an important part in people to nourishing people well.
shaping the incentives that influence food systems and therefore
diet quality. In light of the burden of malnutrition and ill health
described above, this report focuses on realigning food system We also aim to provide guidance to decision makers in the
policies so that they encourage and enable higher-quality diets. private sector, although fewer explicit recommendations are
directed at them. We take this position primarily because
The demand from policy makers for more guidance in this the private sector stakeholders consulted during the course
complex area has been steadily increasing. An extensive array of preparing the report indicated that if governments set
of reports has been published on food systems and nutrition in the incentives, they would make the decisions within those
the past two to three years (see Appendix 1, Table 1.1). These parameters that maximize commercial outcomes.
important reports have covered four aspects of food systems: (1)
metrics for food system outcomes;26 (2) approaches to analysing The report starts by asking the question often posed at the
food systems;27 (3) opportunities and policies for making existing outset by those with a stake in improving diet quality: What is
policies along food value chain more nutrition-sensitive;28 and (4) a high-quality diet? While we have defined a high-quality diet
more in-depth reviews of important topics within the food system generically as a diet that eliminates hunger, is safe, reduces all
space (e.g. food loss and waste).29 forms of malnutrition and promotes health, there is a need for a
more specific understanding of the different types of foods and
Recent international commitments on nutrition are also the level of intake of those foods that make up a high-quality
focused on food systems. The outcome documents of the diet. The composition of a high-quality diet will vary from place
Second International Conference on Nutrition in 2014 called for to place depending on availability and culture. However, there is
“strengthening sustainable food systems”30 and the new United already much guidance at the national and international levels on
Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition 2016–25 supports the the foods that contribute to a high-quality diet. We can therefore
strengthening of food systems for improved nutrition.31 To answer the question by bringing together what international and
implement the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the national bodies already recommend as high-quality diets.
United Nations Zero Hunger Challenge is driving forward a new
approach ‘Transforming our Food Systems to Transform our A subsequent question is: What are the people in different
World’ on the basis that: countries, regions or localities actually eating? We find the
“Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals cannot happen question worryingly difficult to answer on the basis of existing
without ending hunger and malnutrition and without having data. Nevertheless, based on an extensive scoping exercise in
sustainable and resilient, climate-compatible agriculture and food Chapter 3, the best available food intake and sales data are used
systems that deliver for people and planet.”32 to provide a picture of recent general trends in diet quality in
different regions of the world. In Chapter 4, we review existing
This report aims to build on existing work by identifying the forecasts of how diets are likely to change in the future and
role that food systems can play in improving diet quality and show the consequences for health outcomes under a series of
providing guidance to policy makers to implement international assumptions about the future availability of food. In Chapter 5,
commitments on improving food systems for nutrition. It is we consider the underlying drivers of these trends, such as income
directed at government policy makers in low- and middle-income growth, urbanization and climate change.
countries but will also be relevant to those in high-income
countries. Low- and middle-income countries are most likely to Then we move to the central question of this report: How can
be experiencing multiple burdens of malnutrition and policy food systems be leveraged to improve diet quality? In Chapter 6,
makers need an approach that can guide them to the policies we explain what food systems are and identify elements that could
that are likely to have the greatest impact on diet quality and be strengthened to improve diet quality. We break the food system
nutrition. In high-income countries, the malnutrition problems down into the food supply system (consisting of five subsystems),
– typically obesity-related – are less varied. This report is relevant food environments and consumers (Figure 1.4). Chapter 7 outlines
to their policy makers, as it will help address the issues their own some of the options available to policy makers to lever food
populations face, and because they often play a powerful role in the systems towards better quality diets. It divides policies into three
governance of food systems, with consequences for all countries. categories: improving delivery of actions already tried with the
Fanzo, Cogill and Mattei (2012); Acharya et al. (2014) 27Global Panel (2014); IPES-Food (2015); IOM and NRC (2015)
26
28
FAO (2013); Bereuter and Glickman (2015); Townsend (2015); IFPRI (2016b) 29HLPE (2014) 30FAO (2016c) 31FAO (2016d) 32
United Nations (2015)
goal of improving diet quality; levering existing food systems
policies towards diet quality; and ideas for novel actions.
Chapter 8 calls for change in how we think about food systems

and diet quality. First, there is a need to recognize that countries
cannot simply grow their way out of these problems. Certainly,
economic growth is helpful in reducing undernutrition but for
obesity and diabetes, income growth is part of the problem as
well as part of the solution. Second, policy makers in low- and
middle-income countries need to know that their countries
do not have to follow the long and damaging path that high-
income countries are taking towards high-quality diets – there
are shorter routes available. Finally, it is important for all policy
makers to recognize that while food systems function primarily
to produce food and income, they are also intrinsically linked
to health. If they are not explicitly designed to improve health,
there are few guarantees that they will do so.
Low- and middle-income

countries need to know that they
do not have to follow the long
and damaging path that high-
income countries are taking
towards high-quality diets.
Ultimately this report is intended to help policy makers
align food systems to make it easier for consumers to make
decisions that favour high-quality diets. Thus, the aims of the
report are two-fold. First, to change the way decision makers
think about the diet quality problem and its solutions: that
food systems are not just production systems but nutrition
and health systems and provide many of the solutions; that
low- and middle-income countries do not have to follow the
circuitous path of high-income countries to get higher-quality
diets; and that income growth on its own cannot be relied
upon to prevent countries falling into a multiple burden trap
for malnutrition.
The second aim is to help decision makers identify and

design policy solutions for the diet and nutrition contexts
in which they work and provide them with evidence-based
arguments to make the case for implementing them. Failure
to take decisive actions now will lead to very serious health
and economic impacts for all in society, but especially for
women, infants and young children, impacts that will that will
reverberate throughout the life cycle and across generations.
What is a high-quality diet?
• Diet quality indicators for groups vulnerable to undernutrition,

national food-based dietary guidelines, World Health Organization
KEY MESSAGES
(WHO) guidance for a healthy diet and knowledge of unsafe food,

all provide a good indication of what constitutes a high-quality diet.
• These recommendations stress the importance of eating a diverse

diet made up of safe foods, drawing on as many food groups as
possible, with plenty of fruits and vegetables, wholegrains, fibre
and nuts and seeds, while limiting free sugars, sugary snacks and
beverages, processed meats and salt, and replacing saturated and
industrial trans fats with unsaturated fats.
• More countries need up-to-date, food-based dietary guidelines to

help provide guidance to design policies to improve diet quality.
• So that high-quality diets can be delivered to people in the future,

they must be produced sustainably.
2 What is a high-quality diet?
In this chapter, we establish what governments and international agencies recommend people should eat to achieve a high-quality
diet. The chapter also considers the environmental trade-offs involved in eating certain diets and foods.
2.1 Defining a high-quality diet
High-quality diets are those that eliminate hunger, are safe, reduce where meat consumption is so high that it presents a disease
all forms of malnutrition, promote health and are produced risk, the advice could be to consume less meat.
sustainably i.e. without undermining the environmental basis to
generate high-quality diets for future generations. • There is as yet no universally agreed set of indicators to measure
diet quality.35
What is a high-quality diet? This is a difficult question to answer
in a definitive sense for all countries. There are four core reasons Despite these challenges, there is a range of existing international
for this: and national sources, which can be used to characterize what
is already recommended for high-quality diets. The first is from
• While there is a fair amount of agreement on what a high- the food security and undernutrition literature and emphasizes
quality diet should deliver in terms of nutrients and diet the special requirements of babies, infants and young children
components for all individuals, translating this into diets and the need to diversify diets, especially in low-income settings.
that are affordable and culturally acceptable varies between The second derives from the literature on human diseases, which
contexts. assumes that calorie requirements have been met and focuses
on energy balance and the consumption of certain health-
• People of different age, gender, disease status and physical promoting diet components. The third derives from national
activity patterns have different dietary needs for energy33 and food-based dietary guidelines, which many countries have now
for micronutrients.34 established for their citizens.
• Diet quality already varies widely between and within countries, High-quality diets also need to be safe so that they do not
which in some cases means different recommendations will be cause foodborne disease (FBD). There is clear evidence of what
required. For example, in some countries where the intake of constitutes unsafe food. We also consider the more recent
micronutrients is very low for certain vulnerable groups, the proposal that the degree of processing is an indicator of diet
advice could be to increase the intake of meat because it is a quality and then assess what it will take to deliver high-quality
good source of these micronutrients. However, in countries diets into the future.
High-quality diets are those that eliminate hunger, are safe, reduce all
forms of malnutrition, promote health and are produced sustainably
i.e. without undermining the environmental basis to generate high-
quality diets for future generations.
FAO, WHO and UNU (2001)

33
FAO and WHO (2001)
34 35
Leroy et al. (2015); Schwingshackl and Hoffmann (2015)
32 Chapter 2: What is a high-quality diet?

2.2 Diet quantity and quality for vulnerable groups
Table 2.1 summarizes United Nations (UN) guidance on the diet represented by the foods consumed in a reference period:
of groups that are particularly vulnerable to undernutrition.36 the more food groups, the higher the diet quality.38 Taking
This includes infants up to the age of two, women and low- the score involves measuring foods consumed from specific
income households. For infants 0–6 months of age, breast milk groups. All five diversity scores include starchy staples, fruits,
provides them with all the nutrients they need. Beyond this age, vegetables, legumes, nuts, seeds and animal source foods
the indicators emphasize dietary diversity. Dietary diversity is (ASF) (e.g. meat, dairy, eggs, fish). Since these indicators
a well-known “qualitative measure of food consumption that were developed in the context of undernutrition, they
reflects household access to a variety of foods and is also a proxy do not account for the risk of excess intake of any specific
for nutrient adequacy of the diet of individuals.”37 The diversity food group in the diet. One of the scores for low-income
scores listed in Table 2.1 measure how many food groups are households also includes oils/fats and sweets.
TABLE 2.1: UN guidance on diet quantity and quality for vulnerable groups
Group vulnerable to Measure of quantity
Foods included in the score Threshold
undernutrition and quality of diet
Exclusively breastfed39 (i.e.
Infants 0–6 months of age NA Exclusivity threshold for individuals
no other foods or liquids)
Indicator combines standards
Grains, roots, tubers; legumes and nuts; dairy of dietary diversity and feeding
Minimum acceptable diet
products; flesh foods; eggs; vitamin A-rich frequency by breastfeeding status.
Infants and young (MAD)40
fruits and vegs; other fruits and vegs Thresholds are contingent on these
children 6–23 composite indicators.
months of age
Minimum dietary Score ranges from 0–7. A minimum
As above
diversity (MDD)41 recommended threshold is 4.
Starchy staples; dark green leafy vegs (GLV);

Women’s dietary diversity other vitamin A-rich fruits and veg; other fruits
As above
score (WDDS42)43 and vegs; organ meat; meat and fish; eggs;
legumes/nuts/seeds; milk and products
Women
Starchy staples; beans and peas; nuts and seeds;
Score ranges from 0–10. Minimum
dairy; flesh foods; eggs; vitamin A-rich dark
MDD recommended threshold is 5 foods
GLV; other vitamin A-rich vegs and fruit; other
per day.
veg; other fruit
Cereals; white roots and tubers vitamin A-rich
vegs and tubers; dark GLV; other veg; vitamin
Household dietary A-rich fruit; other fruit; organ meat/offal; flesh Score ranges from 0–12. No
Low-income households
diversity score (HDDS)44 meat; eggs; fish and seafood; legumes, nuts, threshold but 12 is highest.
seeds; milk and products; oils and fats; sweets;
spices/condiments/beverages
Only two out of 31 low-income countries and 12 out of 51 low

to middle-income countries have food-based dietary guidelines.
36
This is not an exhaustive list but it summarizes the most commonly used measures. 37FAO and EU (2010) 38Most of the indices specify the following food
groups; starchy staples; beans and peas; nuts and seeds; dairy; flesh foods; eggs; vitamin A-rich dark green, leafy vegetables (GLV); other vitamin A-rich vegetables
and fruits; other vegetables; other fruits (this is the set for the women’s dietary diversity score [WDDS] in the table).
39
WHO (2015a) 40WHO, UNICEF, USAID, AED, UC Davis and IFPRI (2010) 41WHO, UNICEF, USAID, AED, UC Davis and IFPRI (2010) 42WDDS is also known as
MDD-W (minimum dietary diversity for women of reproductive age) by FAO. 43FAO and FHI 360 (2014) 44FAO and EU (2010)
2.3 Diet quality for general populations
The second approach to defining high-quality diets has been

Box 2.1: World Health Organization (WHO)
developed in the context of populations that have attained
a minimum calorie intake (albeit not exclusively) and offers
guidance on healthy diets
recommendations on mixes of foods and diet components to
minimize all forms of malnutrition as well as diet-related NCDs. • A healthy diet helps protect against malnutrition in all
its forms, as well as non-communicable diseases (NCDs),
2.3.1 WHO guidance for a ‘healthy diet’ including diabetes, heart disease, stroke and cancer.
The WHO has issued guidance of what comprises a ‘healthy • Healthy dietary practices start early in life – breastfeeding
diet’ on the basis of its scientific reviews of the evidence. Box fosters healthy growth and improves cognitive
2.1 summarizes WHO’s guidance. Although it emphasizes that development. It may also have longer term health benefits,
a healthy diet starts early in life, the specific recommendations such as reducing the risk of becoming overweight or obese
are for adults. They emphasize minimizing the intake of saturated and developing NCDs later in life.
and trans fats, free sugars and salt.
• Energy intake (calories) should be in balance with energy
2.3.2 National food-based dietary guidelines expenditure.
At the national level, governments have taken established • A healthy diet includes fruits, vegetables, legumes (e.g.
scientific knowledge on high-quality diets and used it to develop lentils, beans), nuts and wholegrains (e.g. unprocessed
food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs). FAO describes these maize, millet, oats, wheat, brown rice).
guidelines as:
“short, science-based positive messages on healthy eating and • At least 400 g (five portions) of fruits and vegetables a day.
lifestyles aimed at preventing all forms of malnutrition and Potatoes, sweet potatoes, cassava and other starchy roots
keeping people well-nourished and healthy. They embody are not classified as fruits or vegetables.
national nutrition recommendations and express the principles
of nutrition education in terms of food.”45 • Total fat should not exceed 30% of total energy intake
to avoid unhealthy weight gain, with a shift in fat
Over the last two decades, a growing number of countries have consumption away from saturated fats to unsaturated fats
developed country-specific FBDGs. These guidelines represent and towards the elimination of industrial trans fats.
recommendations from national governments to consumers
on diets that promote health in the country’s context. However, • Limiting intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total
FBDGs are largely absent for low-income countries. Only 2 out of energy intake is part of a healthy diet. A further reduction
31 low-income countries and 12 out of 51 low to middle-income to less than 5% of total energy intake is suggested for
countries have FBDGs. The percentage of countries with FBDGs additional health benefits.
rises to approximately 50% for the upper-middle- and high-
income countries. • Keeping salt intake to less than 5 g per day helps prevent
hypertension and reduces the risk of heart disease and
An analysis of 83 FBDGs is shown in Figure 2.1. It shows that: stroke in the adult population.
• FBDGs broadly reflect the food-based WHO recommendations, Source: WHO (2015a)
although many do not specify recommended levels of food intake
• nearly all FBDGs stress the need to increase consumption
of fruits and vegetables and most countries stress the need • less than 25% of FBDGs recommend reducing or moderating meat
for a diverse diet intake (although no details are provided on the kind of meat)46
• nearly all FBDGs recommend lower consumption of sugar and salt. • FBDGs in some countries, for example Brazil, recommend
Over 75% of all FBDGs recommend reducing sugar consumption. the avoidance of ‘ultra-processed’ foods high in fats, sugars
• around half of countries refer to the importance of safe and salt (see Section 2.5)
food (see Section 2.4) • very few FBDGs explicitly mention environmental concerns
• few countries make reference to wholegrains (see Section 2.6).
FAO (2016b)
45
Lower-income guidelines also recommend exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life and ensuring that the salt that is consumed is iodized.
46

There are some notable differences between countries at different perhaps reflecting the greater risks in lower-middle-income
income levels. Recommendations on food safety and hygiene countries. Interestingly, the emphasis on consuming a varied
become less frequent from lower-middle-income to high-income diet is stronger for middle-income countries than it is for
FBDGs, as do recommendations on cooking and preparing foods, high-income countries.
FIGURE 2.1: What 83 national food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) recommend
Do they explicitly recommend eating a varied diet?
Do they recommend to reduce sugar consumption?
Do they recommend to reduce salt consumption?
Do they recommend to reduce fat consumption

or change the type of fats you eat?
Do they recommend to eat more fruits and vegetables?
Do they recommend to reduce or moderate

meat consumption?
Do they mention milk?
Do they mention fish?
Do they mention eggs?
Do they mention legumes?
Do they address food safety or hygiene?
Do they recommend to drink water?
Do they recommend to reduce or moderate

alcohol consumption?
Do they make an explicit reference

to cooking or preparing foods?
Do they explicitly mention environmental concerns?
Do they explicitly mention wholegrains?
0 20 40 60 80 100
■ Low-income (2 out of 31 countries) % of food-based dietary guidelines
■ Low-middle-income (12 out of 51 countries)
■ Upper-middle-income (26 out of 53 countries)
■ High-income (43 out of 80 countries)
Source: Gonzalez and Garnett (2016), Figure 2
2.4 Safe diets
Around half of all countries refer to the importance of consuming

safe foods in their food-based dietary guidelines (Figure 2.1) Box 2.2: Agents which cause foodborne disease
reflecting the fact that diets cannot be high-quality if they are
unsafe.47 Unsafe food means food that is contaminated with • Microbial pathogens e.g. rotavirus, Salmonella spp.,
agents that cause disease (see Box 2.2). Campylobacter spp., toxigenic Escherichia coli. This group
is the most important source of foodborne disease (FBD)
As a result of the combined causes shown in Box 2.2, WHO49 and responsible for diarrhoeal diseases, and for over
estimates that, worldwide in 2010 there were 600 million cases of half of all foodborne disability-adjusted life years DALYs
foodborne illness, causing 34 million disability-adjusted life years (Figure 2.2). They lead to billions of cases of illness and
(DALYs) and 420,000 deaths. over 100 million DALYs each year in low-middle-income
countries. They are found mainly in animal source foods
and fruits and vegetables.
FIGURE 2.2: The global burden of foodborne disease
(total DALYs) by hazard groups, 2010 • Foodborne macro-parasites e.g. tapeworms; fish and
aquatic animal associated fluke (common in South-East
Asia); roundworms and whipworms. Foodborne macro-
parasites are responsible for around 1.4 billion cases and
■ Diarrhoeal disease a burden of 5.8 million DALYs each year (Figure 2.2). They
agents: 17.7% are found mainly in livestock and seafood.
■ Invasive infectious
disease agents: 8.1% • Toxins and chemicals The leading source is aflatoxins
■ Helminths: 5.8% – fungal toxins, which contaminate mainly staple crops
■ Chemicals and toxins
(including Aflatoxin): 0.9% such as maize and groundnuts.48 They are widespread in
tropical and subtropical developing countries. Responsible
for an estimated 90,000 annual deaths from liver cancer
and around 1.5 million DALYs, they are also associated
with stunting in children. Plant toxins and marine toxins
(e.g. diarrhetic shellfish poisoning) are responsible for
tens of thousands of cases of illness. Chemicals such as
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on WHO (2015b), Table 7 arsenic, cadmium, mercury, dioxins and highly hazardous
pesticides can contaminate food; other toxins (e.g.
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and acrylamide), are
Where regional estimates are available, Figure 2.3 shows that in formed by smoking, grilling, roasting and frying food.
African countries, diarrhoeal disease agents are responsible for
the vast majority of the foodborne DALY burden. In South-East Source: Compiled by the authors, based on Grace (2015)
Asian countries, the burden is equally shared between diarrhoeal
disease and invasive infectious disease agents. There are no
projections of foodborne DALYs, but given the rapid pace of
urbanization and growing slum populations, the consumption of
prepared street food and food prepared outside the home, it is
likely that the number of DALYs per 100,000 people will increase.
Microbial pathogens ... lead to billions of cases of illness

and over 100 million disability-adjusted life years
(DALYs) each year in low-middle-income countries.
47
FAO and WHO (2007); Grace (2015); Global Panel (2016b)
48
Unnevehr and Grace (2013)
49
WHO (2015b)

FIGURE 2.3: The global burden of foodborne disease (DALYs per 100,000 population) by hazard groups and by
subregion, 2010
■ Diarrhoeal disease agents ■ Helminths ■ Chemicals and toxins ■ Invasive infectious disease agents
1,500
1,200
900
600
300
0
AFR: D
AFR: E
AMR: A
AMR: B
AMR: D
EMR: B
EMR: D
EUR: A
EUR: B
EUR: C
SEAR: B
SEAR: D
WPR: A
WPR: B
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on WHO (2015b), Table 8
Note: AFR = Africa; AMR = the Americas; EMR = Eastern Mediterranean; EUR = Europe; SEAR = South-East Asia; WPR=Western Pacific. A = very low child
and adult mortality; B = low child mortality and very low adult mortality; C = low child mortality and high adult mortality; D = high child and adult mortality;
and E = high child mortality and very high adult mortality.
2.5 The role of food processing in diet quality
FBDGs are typically based on “wholefoods”, such as fruits rather In 2015, WHO’s regional office for the Americas, Pan-American
than fruit juice, potatoes rather than potato chips and sugar Health Organization (PAHO), released a report52 on trends in the
rather than biscuits/cookies. However, as we show in Chapter sales of “ultra-processed” foods. The PAHO report53 suggests that
3, the amount of foods in the global diet that have undergone the proportion of ultra-processed products in food supplies can
various degrees of processing is increasing. be seen as a measure of overall population diet quality. This is
because these foods have very high energy densities, are high in
While there are no official international guidelines available to free sugars, unhealthy fats and salt and are low in dietary fibre, all
date on the recommended amount of foods with differing degrees of which increase the risk of obesity and other diet-related NCDs.
of processing, in 2014, the Brazilian Food Guide set a precedent
by referring to the degree of food processing. Specifically, it The PAHO report notes that other forms of processing can be
recommends that high-quality diets contain minimal amounts of beneficial for diet quality. Processed foods such as pasteurized
“ultra-processed foods.” The term “ultra-processed” was coined milk, bread made through fermentation, canning and freezing
to refer to industrial formulations manufactured from substances vegetables and flours made from legumes, all provide important
derived from foods or synthesized from other organic sources. They opportunities for preserving foods, converting inedible into
typically contain little or no wholefoods, are ready-to-consume or edible foods and converting difficult-to-prepare foods into
heat up and are fatty, salty or sugary and depleted in dietary fibre, nutritious and convenient forms. These processing methods can
protein, various micronutrients and other bioactive compounds.50 help to increase food availability, extend seasonality through the
Examples include: sweet, fatty or salty packaged snack products, ‘hunger gap’ and importantly, make food safer to eat.
ice cream, sugar-sweetened beverages, chocolates, confectionery,
French fries, burgers and hot dogs, and poultry and fish nuggets.51
PAHO (2015)
50 51
The full list is too extensive to reproduce here and can be found in Annex 4 52PAHO (2015) 53
See Vandevijvere et al. (2013) work
2.6 Sustainable diets
In 2010, FAO introduced the concept of “sustainable diets”, There is considerable debate around the relationship between
defined as: high-quality diets from a nutritional perspective and from an
“diets with low environmental impacts which contribute to food environmental perspective. Are diets that are environmentally
and nutrition security and to healthy life for present and future sustainable and make efficient use of limited natural resources
generations. Sustainable diets are protective and respectful of healthy for humans? Or do countries face a trade-off between
biodiversity and ecosystems, culturally acceptable, accessible, eating healthily and conserving the natural resource base on
economically fair and affordable, nutritionally adequate, safe which people depend on for food, particularly in regions that
and healthy; while optimising natural and human resources.”54 are under ever-greater pressure from growing populations and
changing climate?
Sustainability, however, is only incorporated in a small number
of FBDGs (Figure 2.1). Four countries have official guidelines that Figure 2.4 provides an overview of the global food system’s
include sustainability (Brazil, Germany, Sweden, Qatar) and some contribution to total global energy consumption as well as to
countries have quasi-official guidelines that refer to sustainability greenhouse gas emissions. It is important for two reasons. First, it
for example, Netherlands, Norway, Iceland and France.55 shows the food production/post-production shares of energy use
and greenhouse gas emissions. Both the components of the food
system (production/post-production) have significant impacts
FIGURE 2.4: The food system’s contribution to on the environment. It is critical therefore to consider the entire
total global energy consumption and greenhouse food system and not just part of it when examining environmental
gas emissions footprints. Second, it demonstrates that food production produces
2.7 times more greenhouse gas emissions than post-production
35 processes, while the latter uses 3.5 times more energy than food
production does. This shows why it is essential to look at different
environmental dimensions of food systems when considering
30 4 whether high-quality diets in the future will be environmentally
2
sustainable. Very few studies analyze the various parts of the food
1 system from an environmental perspective.
25
Share of global total (%)
At a global level, most research on diets and the environment has

20 6 focused on modelling greenhouse gas reduction. For example,
14 greenhouse gas emissions are lower for stylized Mediterranean,
pescatarian and vegetarian diets compared to the current global
15 average diet.56 Another global study,57 which compares baseline
8 emissions in the year 2005/07, suggests that a projected 51%
increase in food-associated greenhouse gas emissions by 2050
10 would be reduced to a 7% increase if diets in line with global
>1
dietary guidelines were adopted globally.
11 5
5
At the country level, estimates58 optimizing the UK diet in line
3 with WHO guidelines (i.e. increasing fruits and vegetables intake
0 and reducing red meat and processed meat intake) could lead
Energy Greenhouse to a decrease of 17% in greenhouse gas emissions and increase
consumption (%) gas emissions (%) average life expectancy by eight months.
■ Cropping production
■ Livestock production
But greenhouse gas emissions represent only one dimension of
■ Fisheries production a diet’s environmental footprint. A global analysis59 of the carbon
■ Processing and distribution and water footprint of different foods within food groups such
■ Retail, preparation and cooking as fruits, vegetables, oils and nuts shows considerable variation
in ecological footprints. They conclude that there are many
synergies between a diet that is both good for health and the
Source: 2016 Global Food Policy Report, Figure 3 (IFPRI 2016b) environment, as long as the most sustainable production choices
are made for each food group.
Burlingame and Dernini (2010) 55Gonzalez Fischer and Garnett (2016)

54
Tilman and Clark (2014) 57Springmann et al. (2016) 58Milner et al. (2015)
56
Downs and Fanzo (2015)
59

Data for the United States (US)60 illustrate the levels of energy of plant foods produces lower greenhouse gas emissions per
and resource use for the consumption of different food groups calorie than animal-based foodstuffs, the consumption of fruits
(Figure 2.5). The results show that there is a challenge, at least in and vegetables (nutritionally positive) uses more ‘blue water’
this case, of trying to align nutrition, energy use, water use and (i.e. water derived from rivers, lakes and aquifers) and energy per
greenhouse gas emissions. For example, while the consumption calorie than less healthy food items such as added sugars.
FIGURE 2.5: Indices of average energy use, blue-water footprint and greenhouse gas emissions per calorie of
food for each food group, US data
100
■ Energy Use
80 ■ Blue Water Footprint
■ Greenhouse Emissions
60
Index
40
20
0
Fruits/Fruit juice
Vegetables
Dairy
Grains
Meat
Poultry
Fish/Seafood
Nuts, seeds, soya
Added sugars
Solid Fats
Oils
Eggs
Food group
Source: Tom, Fischbeck and Hendrickson (2015)
Note: A score of 100 represents the highest resource use and emissions per calorie. Scores were developed based on the weighted averages of energy use, blue-
water footprint and greenhouse gas emissions per calorie estimates for comparable food types within each food group.
Estimates suggest that the expected 51% increase

in food-associated greenhouse gas emissions
by 2050 would be reduced to a 7% increase if
WHO guideline diets were adopted globally.
Tom, Fischbeck and Hendrickson (2015)

60
FIGURE 2.6: The water-use consequences of different diets in the EU-28 countries
The average EU-28 diet for the reference period 1996-2005 4,265
Based upon the dietary recommendations issued by 3,291

the German nutrition society
Vegetarian diet: Same as the healthy diet, but all meat 2,655
products are substituted by pulses and oilcrops
Combination diet: Diet between a healthy and vegetarian diet: 2,973
half of the meat products is replaced by pulses and oilcrops
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Litres of water per capita per day
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on Vanham, Mekonnen and Hoekstra (2013)
While these costs will be different for the same foods in other and Qatar include messages related to sustainability, food
countries, particularly with respect to energy costs involved waste and leftovers in their FBDGs.63 And while the latest
in processing and food chains, these patterns suggest that US Dietary Guidelines for Americans 201564 do not explicitly
aligning high-nutrition, low-resource footprints and low-carbon include sustainability, the report behind the guidelines
footprints will not be straightforward. More analyses of this kind acknowledges that:
for a much wider range of food systems are needed to give policy “plant-based diets are associated with lower resource use than
makers greater guidance. diets higher in animal products and lowered resource use will
be important in ensuring long-term food security".
Research is also needed which focuses on diets rather than the
consumption of individual foods. When diets are reviewed, the
diversity of foods involved produces fuller and more rounded Aligning high-nutrition, low-
pictures of nutritional and environmental trade-offs. For
example, in the 28 European Union (EU) countries, it has been resource footprints and low-
estimated61 that the consumption of healthier diets generates
lower total water62 footprints (see Figure 2.6). carbon footprints will not be
Achieving a balance between diets that are high quality
straightforward. More analyses of
and those that are environmentally sustainable may look
challenging, but as the science advances our understanding
this kind for a much wider range
of how to do this will improve. A small but increasing number of food systems are needed to give
of countries is beginning to consider sustainability in their
food-based dietary guidelines. Brazil, Germany, Japan, Sweden policy makers greater guidance.
Vanham, Mekonnen and Hoekstra (2013) 62Not just blue water (from irrigation and rivers) but also green water (rainfall) and grey water (water needed to control
61
waste). 63González Fischer and Garnett (2016) 64U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and USDA (2015)

2.7 Implications
The objective in this chapter has been to build a clear Given the coexistence in many low- and middle-income countries
picture of a high-quality diet, which can be used to guide of the continued presence of hunger and growing levels of
food systems policy. As noted at the start of the chapter, overweight and obesity, policy makers face major challenges
this is not straightforward. One of most complex areas is in defining high-quality diets for their populations. But these
meat consumption. For groups with high micronutrient challenges mean it is now even more important to define such
requirements and low meat consumption, such foods offer diets. Not enough low-income countries have FBDGs. These
important opportunities to increase micronutrient intake. countries will need to generate and promote dietary guidelines
For groups with meat consumption levels that are already high, that both improve the diets of those who are not eating enough
the advice is to moderate intake levels. However, it is possible to food and improve the diets of those who are consuming levels of
draw together the elements of what is currently recommended certain foods and components above recommended levels. Also,
for high-quality diets, as we do in Box 2.3. besides offering guidance to consumers, FBDGs need to guide
policy decisions across food systems. This is not currently general
practice and is a missed opportunity.
Box 2.3: Elements of a high-quality diet
Drawing the evidence together with an emphasis on adequacy, complementary foods that are sufficiently diverse and
diversity and balance, current recommendations from UN nutrient-dense to promote optimal child growth.
agencies, governments and scientific bodies point towards the
following choices for ensuring a high-quality diet for all people The food consumed needs to be free of foodborne disease
over two years of age: agents and toxins. There is a tension here since many fresh,
• E at a diverse diet drawing on as many food groups as perishable foods, which can contribute to a high-quality diet –
possible. e.g. fruits and vegetables, dairy and fish – are also the leading
•C onsume diets that contain plenty of wholegrains, fruits and sources of foodborne disease.
vegetables, fibre and nuts and seeds.
•U nless a vegetarian or intolerant to dairy, consume eggs, Food processing can be beneficial for the promotion of high-
moderate amounts of dairy (mainly milk), fish and small quality diets; it can make more food more available as well
amounts of meat. as making food safer. However, some forms of processing can
•A void or consume low levels of added sugars, sugary snacks lead to very high densities of salt, added sugar and saturated
and beverages. fats and these products, when not consumed in low amounts,
•A void or consume low levels of processed meat. will undermine diet quality.
• Replace saturated and industrial trans fats with unsaturated fats.
• E at low levels of salt and ensure that all salt that is consumed To be accessible to future generations, high-quality diets
is iodized. need to be produced, processed, distributed and prepared in
ways that use natural resources sustainably and mitigate the
Babies under six months of age should consume only generation of greenhouse gases.
breast milk; infants and young children 6–23 months of
age should continue to consume breast milk but consume Source: Compiled by the authors
How diets are changing
• Huge numbers of people worldwide have diets that are deficient

in adequacy, diversity and balance.
• Many infants are not breastfed despite WHO guidance.

• Only a small proportion of infants from low- and middle-income
countries are meeting minimum recommended dietary standards.
• In low- and middle-income countries, more than half of adolescent

girls (10-20 years) surveyed are consuming monotonous,
starch-based diets with low diversity, which do not meet their
KEY MESSAGES
micronutrient needs.
• Over time, people are consuming more recommended components

of high-quality diets. However, despite dietary improvements, the
net result is still a prevalence of low-quality diets in most countries.
• Sales of ultra-processed food and sugar-sweetened beverages are

growing. This growth is almost exclusively found in lower-middle-
income and upper-middle-income countries.
• Income growth does not guarantee healthier diets. Countries

cannot simply ‘grow’ their way out of poor diet quality.
• The lack of data on what people actually consume around the

world needs urgent attention from policy makers.
3 How diets are changing
ver half of adolescent

O Box 3.1: Diet and food intake: Data challenges
girls in low- and middle- Assessing the quality of diets is challenging. Different
combinations of food intake are not easily aggregated and
income countries do not get the availability of internationally comparable data is poor.
micronutrients that are vital There are no standard protocols for collecting data on food
intake and a plethora of methods are used, each with its
for good health (iron, zinc, own strengths and weaknesses and at irregular intervals.
This has led to a highly disparate set of intake estimates and
calcium, vitamin D, folate, the process of integrating them has only recently begun
(See Appendix 2, Table 3.1).
thiamin and riboflavin).
Many analysts use FAO food balance sheets as proxies for
diet intake although recent work has shown a variable
correspondence between food availability and food intake.65
In this report, food balance data are used in Chapters 6 and
7 as a valuable resource to estimate past and future changes
While there is enough scientific evidence to broadly establish in food supply. For diets, data from the Global Dietary
high-quality diets that are beneficial for preventing malnutrition Database66 are drawn upon. This database brings together
in all its forms, recommendations in international and national data from 266 country-specific nutrition surveys for 187
guidelines have not been accompanied by major changes in countries between 1990 and 2013. In 2014, the database
dietary patterns around the world. Large numbers of people have released data on a select number of ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’
diets that are inadequate, not diverse and balanced. components of diet (Appendix 3 Table 3.2).
Our ability to describe diets is hampered by fragmented and
incomplete data. Much of the data available are not on what
people actually eat, but on what is produced, sold or purchased,
from which diets are estimated based on a range of assumptions. In this chapter, data from a variety of sources are used to
This important distinction is explained in Box 3.1. The lack of examine dietary trends from several perspectives: how diets
sound, empirical data represents a serious hurdle to policy have changed among adults, infants, young children, women
makers who seek to design evidence-based policies aimed at and households experiencing poverty. Because of the growing
promoting healthier diets. This significant data gap needs to be importance of ultra-processed foods in diets we also
urgently addressed. examine trends in their sales.
Our ability to describe diets is hampered by fragmented and

incomplete data.
Sales of ultra-processed foods in East and South-East Asia are

expected to approach those of high-income countries by 2035.
65
Del Gobbo et al. (2015) Global Nutrition and Policy Consortium (2014)
66
44 Chapter 3: How diets are changing

3.1 Data from the global dietary database
3.1.1 The database

In 2014, Tufts University in the US established the Global NCDs. The list in Table 3.1 shows dietary risks considered
Dietary Database as a means of drawing together household and the consumption ranges assumed to avoid disease risk.
surveys that measure actual diets. Although the data released The dietary risk factors are ranked in order of importance from
to date do not include all food groups or the granular detail the top going down i.e. the number of people affected
required for measurements of diet diversity outlined in Chapter by consumption levels and the strength of association with
2, they are, in our view, the best collation of diet data available.67 various diseases.
They represent an improvement over the use of food supply data
as a proxy for diet, as has commonly been done in the past on These categories are mostly consistent with international and
research on changing diets (see Box 3.1). national guidelines reviewed in Chapter 2, with the exception of
red meat which is labelled as “unhealthy”, but which in nutrient
The data released by the initiative divides food items and diet deficient contexts can be an important means of increasing
components into those categorized as ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ micronutrients in the diet.
as they are related to NCDs such as coronary heart disease,
stroke and diabetes (see Appendix 3 Table 3.2 for definitions). In the next section, publicly available data from the Global
Dietary Database on foods considered to have a large influence
These categorizations are based on systematic reviews of the on diet quality are summarized to outline current levels of
latest scientific evidence on the links between food intake and consumption, trends over time and trends across income groups.
TABLE 3.1: Dietary risks considered in the Global Burden of Disease Study
Food/diet risk component Theoretical minimum risk exposure level (range to avoid health risk)
(ranked based on most DALYs generated:
top generates the most)
Diet low in fruits Consumption of fruit between 200 g and 400 g per day
Diet high in sodium Consumption of sodium between 1 g and 5 g per day
Diet low in wholegrains Consumption of wholegrains between 100 g and 150 g per day
Diet low in vegetables Consumption of vegetables between 350 g and 450 g per day
Diet low in nuts and seeds Consumption of nuts and seeds between 12 g and 20 g per day
Diet low in seafood omega-3 fatty acids Consumption of seafood omega-3 fatty acids between 200 mg and 300 mg per day
Diet low in fibre  Consumption of fibre between 28 g and 32 g per day
Diet high in processed meat Consumption of processed meat between 0 g and 14.3 g per day
Diet low in polyunsaturated fatty acids Consumption of polyunsaturated fatty acids between 10% and 15% of total daily energy
Diet high in trans fatty acids Consumption of trans fatty acids between 0% and 0.8% of total daily energy
Diet high in sugar-sweetened beverages Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages between 0g and 64.3 g per day
Diet high in red meat Consumption of red meat between 11.4 g and 17.1 g per day
Diet suboptimal in calcium Consumption of calcium between 0 g and 0.77 g per day
Diet low in milk Consumption of milk between 425 g and 475 g per day
Source: Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators (2015), Table 1
FAO and WHO are developing a Global Individual Database on Food Intake (GIFT), which, once completed, promises to represent an additional valuable resource on diets.
67
3.1.2 Current consumption
Analysis of the Global Dietary Database food intake data East Asia. From Panel B, we can see that red meat consumption is
reveals substantial variation in food consumption in different similar in East Asia, Latin America, North America and the EU-15.
regions (see Figure 3.1, Panels A and B). From Panel A, we can Trans fat intake is highest in South Asia. Notably, the relative
see that fruit consumption tends to increase from lower- to- consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages exceeds 400 g/day in
higher income regions while vegetable consumption declines. Latin America, followed closely by North America in contrast to
Consumption of seafood omega-3 fatty acids, present in fatty East Asia, where intakes are ten-fold lower (~40 g/day).
fish, is over 70% higher in South-East Asia compared to other
regions. This is in contrast to dairy intake where consumption
exceeds 200 g/day in Europe, compared to <40 g/day in South-
FIGURE 3.1: Intake of key foods and diet components, by region, 2013
PANEL A
400
grams per day unless otherwise specified
350 ■ SSA
■ S. Asia
300 ■ SE Asia
■ E. Asia
250 ■ LAC
■ US-Can
200 ■ EU-15
150
100
50
0
Fruits Vegetables Wholegrains Seafood omega 3 Milk Nuts & seeds Fibre
Fatty Acids* 100
PANEL B
500
grams per day unless otherwise specified
■ SSA
400 ■ S. Asia
■ SE Asia
■ E. Asia
■ LAC
300
■ US-Can
■ EU-15
200
100
0
Red meat Processed Sugar sweetened Sodium *10 Transfat % *100
meat beverages
Source: Masters (2016), based on data from the Global Dietary Database
Note: SSA: sub-Saharan Africa; S. Asia: South Asia; SE Asia: South-East Asia; E. Asia: East Asia; LAC: Latin
America and the Caribbean; US-Can: USA and Canada; EU-15: European Union 15.

3.1.3 Change over time
In general, the consumption of the foods and diet components Income growth is a double-
in Panel A (the ‘healthy’ items) has grown in all regions over the
past decade and only about 5% show declines in a few areas (see edged sword when it comes
Figure 3.2). However, there are some important differences across
food types. Fruit consumption is increasing in all regions, while to diet quality.
vegetable consumption is increasing in only four out of seven
regions. Intake of wholegrains is rising substantially only in South-
East Asia, while consumption of seafood omega-3 fatty acids is
declining in three out of seven regions.
FIGURE 3.2: Changes in intake of key foods and diet components by region, 1990-2013 (%)
PANEL A
80
70 ■ SSA
■ S. Asia
60
% change from 1990 to 2013
■ SE Asia
50 ■ E. Asia
40 ■ LAC
■ US-Can
30 ■ EU-15
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
Fruits Vegetables Wholegrains Seafood omega Milk Nuts & Seeds Fibre Poly
3 Fatty unsaturated
Acids*100 fatty acids (%)
PANEL B
60
50 ■ SSA
■ S. Asia
40
% change from 1990 to 2013
■ SE Asia
30 ■ E. Asia
■ LAC
20
■ US-Can
10 ■ EU-15
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Unprocessed Processed meat Sugar sweetened Sodium Trans fat (%)
red meat beverages
Source: Masters (2016), based on data from the Global Dietary Database.
Note: SSA: sub-Saharan Africa; S. Asia: South Asia; SE Asia: South-East Asia; E. Asia: East Asia; LAC: Latin
America and the Caribbean; US-Can: USA and Canada; EU-15: European Union 15.
The changes in consumption patterns for the foods and diet the consumption of foods that are associated with high-quality
components in Panel B (the so-called ‘unhealthy’ items) are diets (the so called ‘healthy’ components) increase. But the
mixed (see Fig. 3.2). The picture for trans fats is encouraging, consumption of those associated with low-quality diets increase
with declines in all regions. Red meat consumption has declined even more strongly. For example, as national income increases,
everywhere except in East Asia where it has risen by nearly 40%.68 the consumption of fruits, seafood and milk rise, as does the
The consumption of processed meat has risen in all regions while share of polyunsaturated fats, but vegetable consumption
sugar-sweetened beverage consumption has risen in more than declines, as does fibre. Red meat consumption increases
half of the regions, with the largest increase in North America and so too does the consumption of less healthy foods and
during the period. Changes in salt/sodium consumption have diet components such as processed meat, sugar-sweetened
been minimal in all regions. beverages and sodium. The consumption of trans fats stays
constant. While the effects on the overall quality of the diet are
3.1.4 Changes with national income level not clear, Figure 3.3 illustrates how income growth is a double-
edged sword when it comes to diet quality. Increased levels of
Analysis of the impact of income level on diet changes across income certainly enable higher-quality diets, but they also enable
countries in Figure 3.3 shows that as countries get wealthier, lower-quality diets.
Figure 3.3: Consumption of foods and other diet components by national income group, 2013
300
■ Income group 1 (lowest)
■2
250 ■3
■4
■ Income group 5 (highest)
200
150
100
50
0
Fruits (g)
Vegetables (g)
Wholegrains (g)
fatty acids*100 (g)
Milk (g)
Nuts & seeds (g*10)
Fibre (g)
Red meat (g)
Processed meat (g)
beverages (g)
Sodium (g*10)
energy*100)
Seafood omega-3
Poly unsaturated FA
(% of energy*10)
Sugar sweetened
Trans fat (% of
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on data provided by Masters (2016)
he decline in South and South-East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa may reflect a substitution of red meat by other types of fresh meat, but the current data do not allow this
T
68
possibility to be assessed.

But the trends in Figure 3.3 are not predestined for the lower- and remained low (at approximately 6% compared to the UK’s
middle-income countries. As their income increases, they do not 28%).69 Why South Korea has been able to chart this course
have to emulate high-income countries: they can increase the is not entirely clear. It is thought that some combination
consumption of foods that are consistent with a high-quality diet, of a healthy traditional diet, excellent monitoring of diet in
while keeping in check the consumption of foods that are not. annual surveys and the implementation of a range of food
systems policies designed to encourage the availability and
South Korea is a good example of a country with income consumption of foods consistent with a healthy diet are
levels that have grown rapidly but where obesity rates have responsible for this trend.70
3.2 Diets of important population subgroups
The data from the Global Dietary Database are not available for From birth to five months of age
different age and gender categories and regular diet surveys may not The latest data indicate that only a small fraction of all babies
cover the particular dietary needs of certain age groups. Yet as the in the world meet dietary recommendations. The number of
previous chapter outlined, there are some very important groups babies who are exclusively breastfed is rising slowly in low- and
of individuals that have special nutrition requirements throughout middle-income countries (Figure 3.4). This is due, in part, to
their life cycle. Here we draw on specialized data to fill the gap. active promotion campaigns71 but gains are at risk due to weak
implementation of the International Code on the Marketing of
Breast-milk Substitutes into national legislation (only 39 countries
FIGURE 3.4: Percentage of infants age 0-5 months out of 193 have fully enshrined the Code in legislation).72 Between
who are exclusively breastfed by region, around 2008 and 2013, total world milk formula sales volume grew by
2000 and 2012 40.8%, from 5.5 to 7.8 kg per infant/child/year and is projected
to increase by 30.4% to 10.8 kg in 2018, with growth led by the
■ Around 2000 (1998-2002) ■ Around 2012 (2008-2012) infant (0–6 months) and follow-up (7–12 months) categories.73
60
Infants and young children
50 For infants and young children aged 6–23 months, WHO
recommends that breast milk consumption should continue,
40 complemented by the intake of foods that are sufficiently
energy-dense and diverse to promote optimal growth. WHO
30
recommends two indicator thresholds to assess the diet quality
20
of infants and young children: the percentage of 6–23 month olds
who attain a minimum diet diversity (MDD) and the percentage
10 who attain a minimum acceptable diet (MAD). Between them,
they measure diet quality for this age group.74
0
Africa
and Caribbean
Eastern Africca
Central Africa
Western Africa
Southern Africa
South-Eastern Asia
Western Asia
Caribbean
Central America
World
For the low- and middle-income countries where data are

Asia
Latin America
available, the percentages are low. An average of 28% of infants

are consuming minimum dietary diversity (MDD) across 60
countries for which we have data and an average 15% of infants
are consuming a MAD in 50 countries for which data are available
(Table 3.2).75 However, the range is wide for both indicators,
Source: 2014 Global Nutrition Report, Figure 3.3, IFPRI (2014) at 5–90% and 3–72% respectively, suggesting the potential for
improvements even within a low- and middle-income context.
IFPRI (2016a)
69
IFPRI (2015a)
70 71
IFPRI (2014) 72
IFPRI (2016a) 73
Baker et al. (2016) IFPRI (2014)
74
IFPRI (2016a)
75
TABLE 3.2: The percentage of infants and and any babies she may give birth to. It concludes that:
young children meeting WHO minimum “Cereal-based diets, with low consumption of nutrient-dense
recommended standards for diet in low- foods, characterize intakes across regions”.
and middle-income countries
Mothers of reproductive age
Percentage of infants and young
Maternal nutrition is closely tracked because of the nutritional
children 6–23 months
Indicator of Number of of age who meet the minimum demands of pregnancy on women and because of the
coverage of countries recommended levels consequences of poor maternal nutrition on their newborn
interventions with data Median for children.77 However, few countries collect internationally
Lowest Highest
countries
Prevalence prevalence comparable data on the quality of women’s diet. What we
with data have are from nationally representative surveys (Demographic
Children 6–23 and Health Surveys) in a small number of sub-Saharan African
months who 60 28 5 90 countries. Using this data, Figure 3.5 shows that most women
receive MDD
report consumption of starchy staples, but less than half of
Children 6–23
months who 50 15 3 72
women – for all six countries – consumed legumes and nuts,
receive a MAD vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables, dairy or eggs in the
Source: 2016 Global Nutrition Report, Table 5.1, IFPRI (2016a)
preceding day.
Using these same data, analysis78 shows that higher socio-economic

Adolescent girls and young women status was associated with higher dietary diversity for women, with
The nutrition status of adolescent girls is low due to the loss of an increased intake in the number of food groups consumed and
nutrients through menstruation; it is also a time when many more frequent consumption of fruits, vegetables and ASF (i.e. meat,
of them are getting ready to become mothers. A recent major dairy and eggs). Interestingly, obese women, compared to thin
review of the quality of the diets of adolescent girls (10–20 women, had a greater amount of dietary diversity, with particular
years) in a wide range of low- and middle-income countries76 increases in fruits and vegetables and animal-based foods. As
found that there have inadequate levels (by at least 50%) of: already noted, rising incomes may simultaneously facilitate access
iron, zinc, calcium, vitamin D, folate, thiamin and riboflavin – to more diverse and nutrient-rich foods, as well as more energy-
micronutrients that are all vital for the good health of the girl dense diets. This trend has also been reported elsewhere.79
FIGURE 3.5: Percentage of women aged 15-49 years who gave birth in the last three years who
consumed various food groups in the day or night preceding the survey, DHS surveys 2007-2010
100 ● Ghana
● Liberia
90 ● Madagascar
80 ● Nigeria
% of women 15-49 consuming food
● Tanzania
from food group in previous day
70 ● Zambia
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Starchy Legumes Dairy Organ Meat other Eggs Dark Vit A- Other fruit
staple and nuts meat than organs leafy veg rich fruit & veg
Source: Kothari et al. (2014), Table 2.10

Note: Year of data; Ghana 2008, Liberia 2007, Madagascar 2008–9, Nigeria 2008, Tanzania 2010, Zambia 2007.
Elliot et al. (2015)

76
Black et al. (2013)
77
Kothari et al. (2014)
78
Mayén et al. (2014); Imamura et al. (2015)
79

3.3 Purchases of processed foods
Growth of sales of processed foods, including ultra-processed As Figure 3.6 shows, sales in high-income countries have
foods, is shown on Figure 3.6. (The definition of what we include levelled off for all three categories of processed food, although
in the ultra-processed food category is shown in Table 3 in per capita volumes remain high. In contrast, sales have grown
Appendix 4.) The purchases of food do not equate to actual rapidly in lower-middle-income countries and upper-middle-
intake, but still provide a useful proxy measure of how diets are income countries and are catching up with the high-income
changing. Data on the sales of processed foods are collected from countries. For example, in 2000, sales of ultra-processed foods
formal retailers by the market analysis firm, Euromonitor. The and beverages in the upper-middle-income countries were
key limitation of this data source is that no data are available for one-third of those in the high-income countries. Fifteen years
low-income countries, only for those in the middle- (lower and later, they were more than half.
upper) and high-income categories.
FIGURE 3.6: Trends in per capita sales volumes of non-alcoholic beverages, processed foods and ultra-
processed foods by country income group, 2000–15, with 15-year average growth rates shown
Non-alcoholic beverages Processed food Ultra-processed foods & beverages

350
0.14%
300
-0.03%
250
Sales per capita (kg or litres)
1.32%
200
150 3.78%
3.32%
100 6.48%
8.02%
3.35%
50
3.75%
0
2000
2005
2010
2015
2000
2005
2010
2015
2000
2005
2010
2015
Lower-middle-income Upper-middle-income High-income
Source: Baker (2016)
In 2000, sales of ultra-processed foods and beverages in the

upper-middle-income countries were one-third of those in the
high-income countries. Fifteen years later, they were more than half.
In low- and middle-income countries, more than half of the young women
and adolescent girls surveyed do not meet their micronutrient needs.
The sales of most processed foods in the high-income countries and micronutrients, i.e. biscuits and snack bars, confectionery,
have plateaued. Growth is visible in nearly all of the middle- ice cream and frozen desserts, and sweet and savoury snacks.
income countries (Figure 3.7). The lower-middle-income Upper-middle-income countries show the greatest growth in the
countries are showing the fastest growth in sales for processed products that are easier to classify as part of a high-quality diet,
foods that contribute calories, sugars, salt and fats, but little i.e. processed fruits and vegetables.
in the form of fruits and vegetables, legumes and wholegrains
FIGURE 3.7: Total change (percentage) in sales of processed foods (kg/capita per year), by country income
group, 2010–15
50%
40% ■ HIC 2010-2015 ■ UMIC 2010-2015 ■ LMIC 2010-2015
30%
20%
10%
0%
-10%
Baked goods
Biscuits & snack bars
Breakfast cereals
Cheese
Confectionery
Dried processed foods
Milk products
Ice cream & frozen desserts
Oils & fats
Processed fruit & vegetables
Processed meat & seafood
Ready meals
Sauces, dressings & condiments
Soup
Spreads
Sweet & savoury snacks
Yoghurt
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on data from Baker (2016)
Note: HIC: High-income countries; UMIC: Upper-middle-income countries; LMIC: Lower-middle-income countries.
Figure 3.8 shows the data for the non-alcoholic beverage category bottled water are increasing in every region. Sales of carbonated
(defined in Table 3.3, Appendix 4), which includes carbonated drinks are rising in Africa, Asia, the Pacific and the Middle East.
soft drinks, concentrates, ready-to-drink coffee and tea, juice Juices and ready-to-drink sweetened tea and coffee sales are also
drinks and sports and energy drinks. It shows that sales of increasing strongly in East Asia and the Pacific.
The lower-middle-income countries are showing the fastest

growth in sales for processed foods that contribute calories,
sugars, salt and fats, but little in the form of fruits and
vegetables, legumes, wholegrains and micronutrients.

Sales per capita (litres) Sales per capita (litres)
20
40
60
80
20
40
60
80
0
100
0
100
120
140
160
180
120
140
160
180
200
200
■ 2000
Bottled water Bottled water
North America

■ 2007
Carbonates Carbonates
Europe & Central Asia

■ 2015
Concentrates Concentrates
Juice Juice
RTD tea &coffee RTD tea &coffee
Sports & energy drinks Sports & energy drinks
20
40
60
80
20
40
60
80
0
100
0
100
120
140
160
180
120
140
160
180
200
200
Sub-Saharan Africa
Latin America & Caribbean
Juice Juice
FIGURE 3.8: Per capita sales volumes of non-alcoholic beverage categories by region, 2000–15
RTD tea &coffee RTD tea &coffee
20
40
20
40
0
0
5
10
15
25
30
35
45
5
10
15
25
30
35
45
50
50
■ 2000
South Asia

■ 2007
East Asia & Pacific

■ 2015

Juice Juice
RTD tea & coffee RTD tea & coffee
20
40
20
40
0
0
5
10
15
25
30
35
45
5
10
15
25
30
35
45
50
50
World
Middle East & North Africa
Juice Juice
RTD tea & coffee RTD tea & coffee

FIGURE 3.8 (continued): Per capita sales volumes of non-alcoholic beverage categories by region, 2000–15
Much of the recent growth over the 2000–15 period in ultra- (i.e. China, India, Indonesia and Pakistan). Much of the stagnant
processed foods and beverages in lower-middle-income countries growth in high-income countries has occurred in North America.81
and upper-middle-income countries can be explained by the But Africa, the region where hunger and chronic undernutrition
East Asia and Pacific and South Asia regions,80 which together are declining least rapidly, is also experiencing a rapid increase in
are home to four of the world’s six most populous countries the consumption of ‘highly processed foods’ (Box 3.2).
Box 3.2: The rise of highly processed foods in Southern and Eastern Africa
A recent study makes a unique contribution to how diets are as well as urban settings. In urban areas, in the highest income
changing in Africa by pooling survey data from six African group, highly processed foods take 65% of the value of the
countries to explore the consumption patterns of different food basket compared to 35% for this group in rural areas.
income groups in rural and urban areas (see Figure 3.9). It The diets of the poorest households in urban areas are also
shows that as incomes rise, highly processed foods take an a concern as they spend 31% of their food basket on highly
increasing share of the food basket value; this is true for rural processed foods.
FIGURE 3.9: Percentage of monetary value of food consumed from different categories: Ethiopia
2004/2005, Uganda 2009/2010, Tanzania 2010/2011, Mozambique 2008/2009, Malawi 2001/2011,
South Africa 2010
Percentage of value of food consumed from different categories

■ Own production ■ Purchase: unprocessed ■ Purchase: low processed ■ Purchase: high processed
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Poor Vulnerable Lower- Upper- Upper Poor Vulnerable Lower- Upper- Upper
($0-2) middle middle middle (>$250) ($0-2) middle middle middle (>$250)
($2-4) ($4-10) ($10-20) ($2-4) ($4-10) ($10-20)
Rural Urban
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on data in Tschirley et al. (2015)
In urban areas of Southern and Eastern Africa,

in the highest income group, highly processed foods
take 65% of the value of the food basket compared
to 35% for this group in rural areas.
Baker (2016)
80 81
Popkin and Slining (2013); Gómez and Ricketts (2013)
3.4 Implications
The data reviewed in this chapter represent the most complete PANEL A: F&V consumption
by ultra-processed foods, whileg/day,
othersregions,
consume1990-2013
too much red
internationally diet data available. We have brought together meat, saturated and trans fats, soda and ultra-processed foods
■ Total F&V g/day 1990 ■ Total F&V g/day 2013
disparate data to provide a picture of recent trends in diets and soft drinks. Although fruit intake has been increasing, people
■ WHO min threshold F&V g/day
around the world. But the data are imperfect – they are highly are still not consuming sufficient amounts, while vegetable intake
fragmented across methods and surveys, and partial in coverage 500
is declining.
of foods and countries.
400
By way of example, an analysis of dietary intakes of fruits and
We conclude that huge numbers of people worldwide have vegetables, and salt shows that South and South-East Asian
diets that are not of high quality. Box 3.3 summarizes the diet countries exceed the minimum WHO recommended levels of
300
data we presented in the context of what is recommended for a fruit and vegetable consumption but also exceed the maximum
high-quality diet (Chapter 2). It shows a vast gap between what WHO recommended consumption of salt/sodium (see Figure
people could be eating to address malnutrition in all its forms, ill 200
3.10, Box 2.1). Higher-income countries such as the United
health and premature mortality. Infants are not being breastfed States, Canada and European countries, despite their wealth,
as formula sales soar; young children, adolescents and women are are not reaching the recommended levels of fruit and vegetable
100
existing on monotonous, starch based-diets with little diversity consumption. In fact their fruit and vegetable consumption is
and inadequate animal source foods, increasingly supplemented below the average found in sub-Saharan Africa.
0
SSA
S.Asia
SE Asia
E.Asia
LAC
US-Can
EU-15
RoW
World
FIGURE 3.10: Consumption of (A) fruits and vegetables (F&V) and (B) sodium in relation to WHO
recommended levels
PANEL A: F&V consumption g/day, regions, 1990-2013 PANEL B: Sodium consumption g/day, regions, 1990-2013
■ Total F&V g/day 1990 ■ Total F&V g/day 2013 ■ Sodium consumption, 1990, g/day ■ Sodium consumption, 2013, g/day
■ WHO min threshold F&V g/day ■ WHO max threshold salt g/day
500 6
400 5
4
300
3
200
2
100
1
0 0
SSA
S.Asia
SE Asia
E.Asia
LAC
US-Can
EU-15
RoW
World
SSA
S.Asia
SE Asia
E.Asia
LAC
US-Can
EU-15
RoW
World
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on data in Masters (2016)

PANEL B: Sodium consumption g/day, regions, 1990-2013
Note: SSA: sub-Saharan Africa; S. Asia: South Asia; SE Asia: South-East Asia; E. Asia: East Asia; LAC: Latin America and the Caribbean; US-Can: USA and Canada;
■ EU-15:
SodiumEuropean Union 15;1990,
consumption, RoW: g/day
rest of world – includes
■ Sodium Oceania, the2013,
consumption, Middle East and other areas outside the specified regions.
g/day
■ WHO max threshold salt g/day
6
2
1
Box 3.3: A summary of diet data
Infants and young children •
Fruit consumption is generally increasing over time and
• Based on data from over 100 low- and middle-income by country income group, but levels are highly variable. For
countries, less than half of all babies from 0–6 months of example, more than 60% of women surveyed in six African
age are meeting WHO recommended practice of being countries report not consuming any fruits and vegetables
exclusively breastfed. Breast milk is the optimal food for rich in vitamin A in the previous 24 hours.
children in this age group.
• R
ed meat consumption levels are currently low in sub-
• A small proportion of infants and young children from Saharan Africa and South Asia, but consumption in these
low- and middle-income countries – at the median of a regions actually decreased from 1990 to 2013. Red meat
set of approximately 60 countries with data – are meeting consumption has increased substantially in East Asia and
minimum WHO recommended dietary standards. is now at levels seen in the USA and Canada. In general as
national income rises, more red meat is consumed.
Women and adolescent girls
• A systematic review of 85 studies from low- and middle- • S ugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption levels are
income countries found that the diets of more than half of much higher in North America, Latin America and the
the young women and adolescent girls surveyed did not Caribbean than in any other region, and in North America
meet their micronutrient needs. they increased substantially between 1990 and 2013. The
upper-middle-income countries are where consumption
All individuals in a population of SSBs is growing most rapidly.
• F ruit and vegetable consumption is below WHO
recommended levels in every region except East Asia • P
rocessed meat consumption is increasing in every region:
(Figure 3.10A). in SE Asia, Latin America and North America, intakes have
increased by approximately 40% over the past two decades.
•
Salt/sodium consumption of salt is above WHO
recommended levels in East Asia and South-East •
Trans fat consumption is highest in South Asia and is
Asia (Figure 3.10B). declining only slowly there.
•
Vegetable consumption is lowest in South-East Asia and • U
ltra-processed food purchases have levelled off in the
the EU-15 (at almost identical levels). Unlike fruit, vegetable high-income countries, but are growing rapidly in low-
consumption has declined in several regions in the period middle-income countries and in upper-middle-income
1990–2013, including SE Asia, North America and LAC and countries (and in upper-middle-income countries from
also declines as national incomes rise. a much higher level). In the poorest urban populations
surveyed in six African countries, 31% of the basket value of
food is going to highly processed foods. In the upper-income
Source: Compiled by the authors group in urban areas, the share is as high as 65%.
While the consumption of recommended components of Thus, the low- and middle-income countries of today do not
diet is increasing worldwide, the consumption of less healthy have to follow the nutritionally damaging path that high-income
diet components is also increasing. This includes, in particular, countries have taken: diets low in calories and micronutrients
growth in the consumption of ultra-processed foods. The can be addressed without increasing consumption of salt, added
team that helped to compile the Global Dietary Database and sugars and harmful fats beyond recommended levels. Policy
have analyzed it for its health consequences82 conclude that makers need to find more direct and less damaging dietary
the quality of the diets – from a disease perspective – actually pathways from where their countries are to where they want to
declines as national income rises. While this assertion requires be. Chapters 7 and 8 provide advice and guidance on how policy
more analysis before being fully accepted, we note that high- makers can achieve this.
income country populations consume high levels of foods that
are good for health but also foods that are not.
Imamura et al. (2015)

82
Forecasting changes in
food availability
• A continuation of current trends in food availability will not deliver

the diets needed to accelerate hunger reduction or reduce the
growth in obesity.
• Vegetable production is projected to rise much less rapidly than

fruit production. For vegetable availability to meet recommended
levels, there will need to be a strong drive to action across policy,
research, technology and infrastructure.
• Forecasts on the availability of meat, fish and dairy suggest robust

growth in demand from middle-income countries but less in low-
income countries where availability needs to be accelerated. While
in middle-income countries, ways need to be found to slow down
increases in availability once upper limits consistent with good
health are in sight.
KEY MESSAGES
• The numbers of people with obesity are growing exponentially

in the developing world and show no signs of slowing down. For
example, by 2030, sub-Saharan Africa’s rate of overweight and
obesity is expected to reach 17.5%, double that of 2005.
• If current trends continue, the health and economic costs will
be large. The developing world could avert four million deaths
per year by 2050 if the consumption of fruits, vegetables and red
meat – as well as total calorie availability – is brought in line with
recommended levels.
• Different regions and countries need to focus policy on particular

dimensions of diets to reap health benefits. For example, for Brazil,
China and the Philippines, the greatest projected benefit is from
reducing red meat availability.
4 Forecasting changes in food availability
The available data tell us that while diet quality is improving among some groups of people, overall the negative trends are dominant.
How might we expect them to develop over the next two decades? In this chapter, we consider what people might be eating in
low- and middle-income countries up to 2035. The analysis of future food consumption is a difficult task for two reasons. First, given
limitations in the available data and existing models, it is not possible to forecast diets directly. Second, the myriad of factors that
can affect diet quality directly and indirectly develop very differently in specific situations and localities so detailed and finer-grained
analysis is necessary at local levels. Nevertheless, there is a range of useful measures associated with diet quality for which predictions
can be made. Therefore, we use a variety of approaches to achieve this, as explained more fully in each subsequent section.
4.1 Calorie adequacy
Here we report on FAO projections of undernourishment based on Figure 4.1: Undernourishment in the base year and
total calorie availability. The measures are useful to assess the role of projections to 2030 in the business-as-usual (BaU)
adequacy as a critical dimension of diet quality for many countries. scenario, FAO
While most of major world regions met the Millennium 1,000
Development Goal for hunger in 2015,83 business as usual (BaU)
estimates84 (shown in Figure 4.1) suggest that by 2030, there will 29
still be 653 million calorie-deficient people. This is down from 795
million in 2015. Most of the reductions in calorie insufficiency will 800
311
come from Asia, while Africa will see a levelling off. If nothing is
done, Asia and Africa will still be grappling with significant hunger
in the next 15 years. 16
600
47
36 175
Millions
Estimates suggest that if investment of US$117 billion were made

in rural areas over the next 15 years (which is additional to a social
27
protection transfer of US$19 billion), this would be sufficient to 29
400
get to zero hunger in sub-Saharan Africa.85 Although the US$117 311
billion is not driven by nutrition considerations, much of it offers 188
great opportunities for improving the quality of diet as well as the
quantity. For example, approximately 40% of the investment is 200
slated for roads and energy infrastructure, vital for building effective
cold chains for fresh foods, while 10% is for agro-processing and 212 216
12% is for research and development (R&D), and extension.
0
Refocusing these investments through a diet quality lens would 2005–07 (base year) 2030 BaU scenario
enable these large public and private flows to deliver diets higher
■ High-income countries
in diversity (and hence micronutrients), without trade-offs in ■ East Asia
hunger reduction. ■ Latin America and the Caribbean
■ Near East and North Africa
■ South Asia
■ Sub-Saharan Africa
If nothing is done, Asia and Source: Compiled by the authors, based on data in FAO, IFAD and WFP
(2015a), Table 1 .
Africa will still be grappling Notes: (1) the total undernourished in the base year of 2005–7 is 949
million, (2) BaU scenario: In the various regions, GDP is projected to
with significant hunger in the increase at rates between 2.0% (in Latin America and the Caribbean) and
4.5% in East Asia (Table 2). The population in the five regions is expected to
next 15 years. grow by an annual average of 1.1% between the baseline period and 2030.
83
FAO, IFAD and WFP (2015b) FAO, IFAD and WFP (2015a)
84
FAO, IFAD and WFP (2015a)
85
60 Chapter 4: Forecasting changes in food availability

4.2 Food availability
Available calories come from different foods and this is an regions. In Figures 4.2–4.4, the bars above the line show growth in
important measure of diet diversity, which, as shown in Chapter calorie availability per capita from each food, while those below
2, is a critical component of diet quality. Here we draw on FAO the line show a decline. Note that the Food Balance Sheet data
projections to 2030 on food availability.86 The projections show from FAO do not permit a separation for each of these categories
significant changes over time for a number of foods in different into processed and unprocessed foods.
FIGURE 4.2: Growth in per capita daily caloric intake (2005/2007-2030): Low- and middle-income countries
and high-income countries
2.0
■ Low- and middle-income countries
■ High-income countries
1.5
1.0
% per annum
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
Sorghum
Other cereals
Potatoes
Cassava
Plantains
Sugar and sugar crops (raw sugar equivalent)
Eggs
Maize
Other fruit
Pigmeat
Pulses
Wheat
Vegetables
Rice (milled)
Beef, veal and bufalo meat
Milk and dairy, excl. butter (fresh milk equivalent)
Citrus fruit
Other annual crops
Bananas
Poultry meat
Vegetable oils and oliseeds
Sweet potatoes and yams

Barley
Millet
Mutton, lamb and goat meat
Source: FAO Global Perspectives Studies Team, unpublished data

Notes: The commodity and country aggregation follows Alexandratos and Bruinsma (2012).
Overall, projected per capita growth rates are much higher complex profile with respect to nutrition (Box 4.1). They provide
in developing than developed countries (Figure 4.2). These essential micronutrients in a highly digestible form, which is of
increases have many implications for diet quality. For ASF, particular nutritional value in pregnancy and early childhood.
growth in availability will be particularly high in the developing At the same time, certain ASF, such as processed meats and red
world; poultry, beef and dairy will all grow rapidly. ASF have a meat (above a certain level), are less healthy.
Alexandratos and Bruinsma (2012)

86
Box 4.1: Animal source foods (ASF): The challenge of hitting the healthy range87
Globally, in recent decades there has been a large increase in production and trade have made ASF more available in the
the production of poultry and dairy, while growth in red meat developing world.
(from ruminants such as cows and sheep) has been slower
(mainly driven by static levels in the developed world). For fish, But the trends in availability are not linear. FAO finds an S-shaped
there has been a shift from wild-caught to farmed fish, which relationship between increased incomes and increased demand
now accounts for half of world production. These shifts have for ASF.88 In other words, at a certain income in the middle-
been associated with higher productivity, as the capacity of income range, demand rises rapidly. Hence middle-income
chickens and fish to convert feed (largely from grain crops) into countries run the risk of “overshooting” the ASF healthy
meat is far better than for ruminants. At the same time, much consumption range. Low-income countries are projected to
animal production takes place on ever-larger farms, with many struggle to increase ASF consumption to the levels needed to
livestock housed in stall-fed systems, reliant on water and feed address micronutrient deficiencies. So the challenge for low-
brought in from elsewhere, generating heavy environmental income country policy makers is to increase consumption of
and animal welfare costs, such as greenhouse gas emissions ASF (excluding processed meats and being mindful of excess red
and nitrate pollution from slurry. International trade in ASF meat consumption levels). In middle-income countries, policy
has grown rapidly as well, with middle-income countries now makers have to find ways of putting the brakes on consumption
becoming major importers and exporters. These trends in before levels overshoot the healthy range.
Figure 4.2 shows that cereal availability will experience a lower important for diet quality – is low. It will require a concerted effort
level of growth, except for barley, most of which will be used in to change the trajectory of vegetable availability (Box 4.2). The
beer production. While the availability of certain fruits, such as availability of vegetable oil will grow rapidly in the developing world
citrus and bananas is projected to grow rapidly, the projected with health effects dependent on the type of oil that is growing
growth in the availability of vegetables and pulses – both most rapidly (e.g. palm oil is less healthy than olive oil).
Box 4.2: Fruits and vegetables: Shifting the projections89
Chapter 3 showed that in almost all parts of the world, middle-income countries have lagged far behind that of
current consumption of fruits and vegetables is below WHO staple crops.
recommended levels. It is clear from Figure 4.2 that this picture,
at least for vegetables, will not have changed much by 2035 As we shall see in Chapter 8, public policy can incentivize
unless something happens to accelerate current trends. What greater investment in the infrastructure required to produce,
might that be? store and transport fruits and vegetables, for example via
the reform of consumer food price subsidy policies which
Fresh fruits and vegetables are challenging to produce and currently tend to focus on staple crops. These public
distribute. They are susceptible to temperature extremes sector incentives would provide additional impetus
during production and are highly perishable and so need to for improvements in commercial production, such as
be brought to market in an unbroken cold chain or processed higher-quality seeds and more efficient and lower cost
(dried, canned, pickled etc.) rapidly.90 Technological innovation shadehouses and greenhouses,91 extending growing
has considerable potential to improve fruit and vegetable seasons and areas.92 Technology developments in tracking
availability. But, as Chapter 6 will show, public research and transportation, processing and storage technologies93
development investments in vegetable breeding for low- and may also improve availability.
Garnett (2016) 88Alexandratos and Bruinsma (2012) 89Meade et al. (2016)

87 90
FAO (2016a) Brown-Paul (2014)
91
Siegel et al. (2014)
92
Ruiz-Garcia et al. (2009); Samadi (2014); Luo et al. (2016)

93

Figures 4.3 and 4.4 reveal substantial differences in the projected In the wealthier countries of East Asia, growth rates will be
rates of change in availability for countries in four different highest for ASF, fruits and vegetable oils (Figure 4.4). In all four
regions. In sub-Saharan Africa, growth rates in availability will be regions, growth rates for vegetables and pulse availabilities will be
below 1% for most commodities except for a range of ASF (such amongst the lowest.
as poultry, eggs and pig meat), while in South Asia, growth rates
will be higher, particularly for poultry meat availability (Figure 4.3).
FIGURE 4.3: Growth in per capita daily caloric intake (2005/2007-2030): Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia
8
7 ■ Sub-Saharan Africa
■ South Asia
6
5
% per annum
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
Wheat
Vegetables
Rice (paddy)
Beef and buffalo meat
Citrus fruit
Other annual crops
Bananas
Sorghum
Other cereals
Potatoes
Cassava
Plantains
Eggs
Maize
Other fruit
Pigmeat
Pulses
Poultry meat

Barley
Millet
Mutton and goat meat

A continuation of current trends will not deliver

the high-quality diets needed to accelerate hunger
reduction or reduce the growth in obesity rates.
FIGURE 4.4: Growth in per capita daily caloric intake (2005/2007-2030): East Asia and Latin America
2.5
2.0 ■ East Asia
■ Latin America
1.5
1.0
% per annum
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
Citrus fruit
Other annual crops
Bananas
Sorghum
Other cereals
Potatoes
Cassava
Plantains
Eggs
Maize
Other fruit
Pigmeat
Pulses
Wheat
Vegetables
Rice (paddy)
Beef and buffalo meat

Poultry meat

Barley
Millet
Mutton and goat meat

Accounting for population growth, the obesity prevalence for sub-Saharan

Africa will be 17.5% in 2030– a doubling of the figure in 2005.
e developing world will avert four million deaths per year by 2050 by
Th
bringing the consumption of fruits and vegetables and red meat in line
with recommended levels.

4.3 Sales of ultra-processed foods
As we noted in Chapters 2 and 3, the consumption of ultra- in Figure 4.5 show that by 2035, the sales of ultra-processed
processed foods is thought to contribute significantly to foods in upper-middle-income countries will reach almost 75%
overweight and obesity, and levels of consumption of added of the levels in high-income countries.
sugars, saturated and trans fats and salt that are above
recommended levels. The largest sales growth has been in the When examined at a regional level (figures not shown here),
low- and middle-income countries. Figure 4.5 projects these much of the projected rapid growth in ultra-processed food
data forward to 2035.94 The projections suggest that sales of consumption in lower-middle-income countries and upper-
ultra-processed foods will not change substantially in high- middle-income countries will be in East Asia, including such
income countries, but will grow substantially in lower-middle- populous middle-income countries as China and Indonesia, while
income countries and even more rapidly in upper-middle- sales in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa will grow more slowly
income countries. In fact, based on current trends, projections and from a lower base.95
FIGURE 4.5: Projections of sales per capita of processed foods, non-alcoholic beverages and ultra-processed
foods and beverages to 2035 in countries at different levels of income
Non-alcoholic beverages Processed food Ultra-processed foods and beverages
350
Sales per capita (kg or litres)
300
250
200
150
100
50
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
Lower-middle-income Upper-middle-income High-income
4.4 Health implications of food availability projections
How will these projected changes translate into health impacts? population growth, estimates suggest that in 2030, the obesity
First, obesity rates have already been increasing at an exponential prevalence for sub-Saharan Africa will be 17.5% – a doubling of
rate in low- and middle-income countries. Figure 4.6 shows this the figure for 2005.96
clearly for the period 1980–2015. The change in the number of
obese men and women for Africa, Asia and Latin America and The analysis here and work commissioned for this report 97
the Caribbean is stark. shows that a continuation of current trends in food availability
and diets is unlikely to slow obesity rates down. Can we put
Projections of obesity rates to 2030 are therefore a major concern a number on the costs of failing to do so? The best available
(see Box 1.1). The number of obese men and women is growing estimate is from Springmann et al. (2016).98 They compare
in nearly every region (Figure 4.6). For example, accounting for FAO 2050 projections99 of calories available from fruits and
The projections on food purchases are based on projected trends in GDP per capita and the KOF Index of Globalization as a measure of the extent of a country’s integration
into the global economy. The projections cover 78 countries, representing 82% of the world’s population in 2015, but they do not contain any low-income countries
(Baker, 2016). 95Industry-based Euromonitor sales data do not include low-income countries. As the drivers of ultra-processed food and non-alcoholic beverage sales in
low-income countries are likely to be similar to those in middle-income countries, it is reasonable to conclude that sales and consumption will also increase in the former
towards 2035, but probably at a slower rate and from a lower base than in low-medium-income countries. 96Kelly et al. (2008) 97Springmann et al. (2016c)
98
Springmann et al. (2016c) 99This is the same data series we used in Section 4.2, but which we only projected to 2030.
vegetables, from red meat and the total calorie availability with and total calories (down) to recommended levels. They assume
the corresponding recommended dietary levels from WHO and that food availability data approximates food intake data. For
the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)100 referred to here as the developing world, they estimate that the adoption of
the ‘dietary guidelines’. They model the effects of moving red meat these three dietary changes would, in 2050, lead to four million
consumption (down), fruits and vegetable consumption (up) deaths avoided.
FIGURE 4.6: Trends in the numbers of men and women affected by obesity: 1980–2010
400m
350m
300m
Number of people (millions)
250m
Obese men Obese women
200m
150m
100m
50m
0
1980 1990 2000 2010 1980 1990 2000 2010
■ West Africa ■ Central Asia ■ Melanesia ■ Southern Latin America

■ Central Africa ■ South Asia ■ Polynesia and Micronesia ■ High-income English-speaking countries
■ Southern Africa ■ South East Asia ■ Caribbean ■ North Western Europe
■ East Africa ■ East Asia ■ Andean Latin America ■ South Western Europe
■ Middle East and North Africa ■ High-income Asia Pacific ■ Central Latin America ■ Central Europe
■ Eastern Europe
Source: NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2016), Figure 8
Figure 4.7 shows the benefits in terms of avoided deaths per Figure 4.8 disaggregates the analysis in Figure 4.7 to the country
million of the population in 2050 of adopting this improved level for a selection of countries. Two things are worth noting.
(but still limited101) dietary profile: East Asia and Latin America First, on current trends, Brazil will stand to gain more than the
and the Caribbean stand to gain the most from adopting these US in terms of number of deaths avoided by adopting the dietary
recommended levels, followed by sub-Saharan Africa. guidelines recommended by WHO and WCRF.102 Similarly, South
Africa will stand to gain more than Australia, and Bangladesh
The projections help to prioritize where the greatest policy effort will gain more than Japan. This reinforces the extent to which
needs to be placed, at least among these limited number of food- developing country diets, based on current trends, will change
related health risks. For example, for South Asia and sub-Saharan over the next 35 years in ways that are not consistent with
Africa, health gains will be realized mainly through increases in fruit recommended levels. Second, different countries will need to set
and vegetable consumption, whereas in East Asia, the gain will be different priorities over the next 35 years. For India, Bangladesh
from reducing the consumption of red meat because projected and Pakistan, an important challenge is to increase fruit and
levels in 2050 will be well over those recommended levels. In Latin vegetable consumption beyond currently forecast levels. For
America and the Caribbean, the largest share of health improvement China and the Philippines, a key challenge is to bring red meat
will come from reducing calorie availability per capita. consumption more in line with recommended levels by 2050.
100
Full details are given in Springmann et al. (2016). The recommended intakes they apply are as follows: Minimum five portions per day of fruits and vegetables,
max 300 g per week of red meat, less than 50 g per day of sugar and total energy intake as recommended for moderately active population (2200–2300 kcal per day).
101
For example ultra-processed foods are not modelled 102Full details are given in Springmann et al. (2016a)

4.5 Implications
The overall picture of likely food availability outcomes in 2035 FIGURE 4.7: Deaths avoided by applying dietary
is outlined below. guidelines for fruits and vegetables, red meat and
energy intake to food availability data (compared
• Hunger rates will have reduced quite rapidly in Asia but more to 2050 FAO projections) by region
slowly in sub-Saharan Africa, with absolute numbers barely
Deaths avoided per million of population, 2050

changing. Hunger will continue to be a serious issue that food 1200
systems need to address in 2035. The resources that will be ■ Overweight & obesity
required to end hunger also have the potential to improve 1000 ■ Fruit & vegetables
dietary diversity. ■ Red meat
800
• The growth of red meat consumption is slowing down, but
the consumption of other types of ASF will continue to grow. 600
The growth in ASF will be uneven. It will be slowest in the very
400
places it is needed the most – low-income countries where lack
of micronutrients and dietary diversity is a real problem. ASF
200
will increase rapidly in middle-income countries with the risk
of an overshoot beyond healthy levels of ASF availability. 0
Sub-Saharan Africa
Developed countries
East Asia
Latin America & Caribbean
World
Developing countries
South Asia
• Fruit and vegetable availability show different global
trajectories. Fruits will have achieved a steady growth in
availability but growth rates have been lower for vegetables.
For vegetable availability to have met recommended levels,
there will need to have been a strong push on policy, research,
technology and infrastructure.
• Regionally, in East Asia, there are large increases in the

Source: Compiled by the authors, based on data in Springmann et al. (2016a),
availability of meats (all types), fruit, oils, milk and raw sugar supplementary data
but low growth in the availability of vegetables and a decline
in pulses. Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia also show low
growth in vegetable availability.
FIGURE 4.8: Deaths avoided by applying dietary
• Sales of ultra-processed foods have increased rapidly in guidelines for fruits and vegetables, red meat and
low- and middle-income countries, especially in East and energy intake to food availability data (compared
South-East Asia where projected sales levels will approach to 2050 FAO projections) – selected countries
those for high-income countries by 2035.
1200
Deaths avoided per million of population
In conclusion, a continuation of current trends will not deliver ■ Overweight & obesity
the high-quality diets needed to accelerate hunger reduction 1000 ■ Fruit & vegetables
or reduce the growth in rates of overweight and obesity. The ■ Red meat
drivers of these trends are found both outside and within food 800
systems. Drivers found within food systems will be addressed
in Chapter 5. It is the main drivers found outside of food 600
systems–the contextual drivers – that we turn to next: how
400
do they shape diets and food systems and what kinds of diet
challenges do they pose? 200
0
Brazil
China
Mexico
USA
South Africa
Australia
Pakistan
Bangladesh
Japan
Indonesia
Philippines
Sierra Leone
India
Ghana
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on data in Springmann et al. (2016a),

supplementary data
Photo: José Morcillo Valenciano
KEY MESSAGES Why are diets changing?
• Many factors outside the food system have profound implications

for diet quality. Important examples include: income growth,
changes in the size and structure of populations, urbanization,
globalization, climate change and competition for natural resources.
• These drivers are interrelated and combinations of them offer both

opportunities and threats for the attainment of high-quality diets.
There are genuine trade-offs and tensions to be resolved.
• The food system is the place where these drivers converge to

influence diet and as such, the food system becomes a place where
these tensions and trade-offs can be resolved.
5 Why are diets changing?
In the previous chapter, future projections in food availability and purchases were reviewed, along with the economic costs of
continuing with current trends and the benefits of changing them. In the chapters that follow, we consider how these changes might
be made. Here, we take a closer look at the role of a number of the most important drivers of diet. In particular, we focus on the role
of income growth (including changes in poverty and inequality), urbanization, the policies and processes of globalization, population
change, climate change and resource use as drivers of diet change.103
5.1 Income growth
In Chapter 3, we saw that increases in income are accompanied in terms of calories and some micronutrients, the balance in the
by more diverse dietary patterns which are characterized by a intake of foods that contribute to high-quality diets in only small
move away from starchy staples such as grains, roots and tubers quantities will tip over into excessive consumption.
towards other food groups, greater demand for processed
foods to cook at home and more prepared foods bought and Figure 5.1 shows projections to 2030 of annual growth in real
consumed away from home. This is the case at household per capita GDP. South Asia is expected to be the fastest growing
and country levels.104 region, followed by East Asia and South-East Asia. Growth in per
capita GDP in sub-Saharan Africa is positive, but relatively low
While increased income reduces hunger and improves diet compared to Asia. The lower growth in income in sub-Saharan
diversity, it is a double-edged sword for diet quality105 as it also Africa will result in a slow down in the rise in consumption of
compromises the latter by enabling consumption of excessive foods that lower diet quality, but, as discussed in Chapter 3, it will
calories, ultra-processed foods and excessive consumption of also slow down increases in the consumption of foods that will
meat. Thus, current trends will mean that while diets will improve improve diet quality.
FIGURE 5.1: Projected annual growth rate (%) of real per capita GDP, by region, 2015–30
8% North America
Latin America
7% Europe
6% East Asia
Southeast Asia
5% South Asia
Oceania
4% Middle East
North Africa
3% Sub-Saharan Africa
2%
1%
0
-1%
-2% 2015 2020 2025 2030
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on data in USDA Economic Research Service (2016), International Macroeconomic Data Set
The effects of income growth on diets will also depend on how 40% of the population in each country grow faster than the rest.
evenly that growth is shared within counties. Figure 5.2 provides This kind of inclusive growth will probably help to improve diet
poverty projections from the World Bank for low- and middle- quality faster given that those at lower incomes have diets that
income countries.106 It shows that, globally, a 3% goal for poverty are low in calories and micronutrients.
at US$1.90 a day can be achieved by 2030 only if the poorest
103
The possible policy interventions that may affect these drivers (and therefore future diets) are beyond the scope of this report.
Reardon and Timmer (2014) 105Ruel and Alderman (2013) 106Lakner, Negre and Prydz (2014)
104
70 Chapter 5: Why are diets changing?

FIGURE 5.2: Global poverty projections with different assumptions about the inclusivity of growth
30 A. Distribution neutral growth
B. Bottom 40% grows 2pp faster
25 C. Bottom 40% grows 2pp slower
Share of global population
3% goal for 2030

living < $1.90/day, %
20
15
10
0
2002
2005
2008
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
Source: Lakner, Negre and Prydz (2014) Note: pp: Percentage points
5.2 Population change
Along with income, changes in the size and structure of Africa’s population is estimated to double in the next 35 years.
populations will be a strong predictor of future diets. Figure Asia’s population will also increase substantially in absolute terms,
5.3 presents the latest population projections from the UN. reflecting its current magnitude more than future rates of growth.
FIGURE 5.3: Projected changes in population, 2015–50
Regional % change, 2015-50 forecast

Africa 108.9
Oceania 43.9
Latin America and the Caribbean 23.6
North America 21
Asia 19.9
Europe -4.3
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Total population, (billion)

39
2015 1186 634 358 4393 738 7.3
57
2050 forecast 2478 784 433 5267 707 9.7
■ Africa ■ Oceania ■ Latin America and the Caribbean ■ Northern America ■ Asia ■ Europe
Source: The Economist (2015), based on data from the UN Department of Economic And Social Affairs, Population Division (2015)
Overall, population growth rates are decelerating as declining as mortality becomes related to non-communicable rather than
birth rates catch up with declining mortality rates. The communicable diseases. Figure 5.4 shows the recent mortality
demographic transition is slowest in sub-Saharan Africa107 and profiles for women in low-income countries. After 40 years of age,
parts of South Asia.108 The declines in birth rates, due to declines NCDs such as cancers and cardiovascular disease become the
in fertility rates, are positive for maternal and child nutrition leading cause of death.
status.109 Maternal nutrient stores will be depleted by frequent
births, and household time, asset and food resources can be The demographic transition also results in the potential for a
focused on fewer household members. The increased potential demographic “dividend”, where the ratio of those of working
for vulnerable groups to access higher-quality diets under these age to those of non-working age reaches a peak. Many policy
circumstances is clear. makers in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa regard this as a
dividend because there is an assumption that the new, young
The demographic transition means that many populations are labour market entrants will be able to gain jobs that generate
ageing and this has implications for diets. An individual’s nutrient wage rates that keep households out of poverty. This is another
needs change with age; certain nutrients become harder to reason to focus on the diets of infants and young children –
absorb via diets (e.g. vitamin B12), in part because older adults to support their cognitive development and achievements in
often eat less, but also because their diets change. The diet school – achievements that should be rewarded in the labour
quality of adults becomes more important as populations age, market in subsequent decades.110
FIGURE 5.4: Profile of female deaths by age, low-income countries
■ Injuries ■ Cardiovascular diseases ■ Cancers ■ Maternal causes

■ Chronic respiratory diseases ■ Diabetes ■ Other non-communicable diseases ■ Communicable diseases
100%
80%
Percentage of deaths
60%
40%
20%
0%
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 45 40 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Source: WHO (2014), Figure 3.4 Age (years)
The diet quality of adults becomes more important as

populations age, as mortality becomes related to non-
communicable rather than communicable diseases.
107
Canning, Raja and Yazbeck (2015) Mehrotra (2015)
108 109
Bhutta et al. (2013); Headey et al. (2015) Norris et al. (2014)
110

5.3 Urbanization
The percentage of the world’s population that lives in urban areas opportunities and challenges for food systems.112 Much of the focus
is increasing steadily and most rapidly in sub-Saharan Africa and of work on urbanization and food systems has been in two areas: the
Asia (Figure 5.5). This is due to rapid population growth in towns links between expansion of built up areas and the loss of agricultural
and cities and rural to urban migration.111 Urbanization generates land, and on the relationship between urban incomes and diets.113
FIGURE 5.5: Urban percentage of overall population by region, 1950–2050
100
80
Urban percent of overall population
60
40 World
Africa
Oceania
Latin America and the Caribbean
20 Northern America
Asia
Europe
0
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
Source: Reardon (2016), based on UN DESA (2014)
Being an urban dweller is associated with a number

of consumer preferences and lifestyle changes including:
long with income, changes
A
in the size and structure of
• year-round access to fresh foods
• greater access to commercially fortified foods114 populations will be a strong
• access to a greater share of food in the market
• more people working outside the home and an associated predictor of future diets.
demand for foods that are more highly processed and
require less preparation time
• g reater exposure to food marketing and advertising Urbanization generates
that influences norms and preferences on what is healthy
and what is not opportunities and challenges
• more sedentary lifestyles and fewer safe built-up areas
to encourage physical exercise for food systems.
• t he lack of home space to prepare food and hence a
greater reliance on affordable street food which is often
high in fat and salt.115
Matuschke (2009)
111 112
Reardon (2016) Seto and Ramankutty (2016)
113 114
Miller (2016) Steyn et al. (2014)
115
TABLE 5.1: Challenges and opportunities faced by consumers arising from urbanization
Factors affecting consumers Opportunity for high-quality diets Challenge to high-quality diets
Increased access to fresh Fresh foods such as fruits and vegetables are good Consumption of ASF above certain levels are not
foods for high-quality diets consistent with high-quality diets
Greater access to Promotes access to micronutrients for vulnerable Improper fortification or high cost of fortified foods are
commercially fortified foods groups who can afford fortified foods a risk for high-quality diets
A greater range of high-energy-dense, low-

Accessing a greater share of A greater range of processed foods such as micronutrient foods are available. Consumers are
food from markets legumes, vegetables and fruits are available more vulnerable to food price changes due to
international and domestic shocks
Availability of good quality prepared food saves

Demand for foods that Foods may be unaffordable or low in nutrient quality
time for other activities that are important for
require less preparation time or unsafe
nutrition, such as child care
Availability of good quality prepared food saves

Demand for foods outside Foods may be unaffordable or low in nutrient quality
time for other activities that are important for
home or unsafe
nutrition, such as child care
Eating outside the home is found to be a risk factor for higher challenge for policy makers who are aiming to strengthen their
fat intake and low-micronutrient levels in high-, middle- and agricultural sector. It also poses a serious threat to the livelihoods
low-income country settings.116 Food safety (Chapter 2) is also of domestic farmers. Land use, water use and investments in
an issue of growing concern in urban areas.117 And food loss and infrastructure for transport, storage and other logistics need
waste are more of a risk if food chains get longer as they tend to be made in line with maximizing livelihood opportunities
to do in urban areas.118 These challenges and opportunities are for domestic farmers and diet quality opportunities for all.
summarized in Table 5.1. Conurbations provide opportunities to sell processed and fresh
products in areas of high population density, opportunities
For producers, the spatial concentration of urban populations that large supermarkets as well as smaller retail outlets are well
provides markets for domestic food producers, provided there is placed to take up. Choices made about location, size and fees
sufficient land and water available to meet this increased demand and taxes will be critical to the ability of these businesses
and internal transport and market infrastructure costs are not to improve the access of vulnerable people to food that is
prohibitive. But where land or water resources are converted nutritious, safe and affordable.
from farm to residential or industrial use, or where infrastructure
quality is poor and costs are high, domestic production will The fact that so many research studies find rates of urban
struggle to respond to the increased demand. Imported food may dwelling to correlate to lower levels of undernutrition and higher
be cheaper and preferred if its quality is higher and its processing levels of overweight and obesity – even controlling for income
makes it more convenient to the consumer. levels120 – highlights both the challenges and the opportunities
of urbanization when it comes to the production and acquisition
Whatever the source of food, rapid urbanization provides of high-quality diets. Policy makers need to find ways of
opportunities but also major challenges to food systems and the strengthening the positive links between urbanization and diet
infrastructure underpinning them. For example, in Nigeria, one quality, while not blunting its ability to help reduce hunger and
of the countries that is urbanizing most rapidly, estimates suggest undernutrition. City and municipal governments will have a
that a Nigerian city of four million inhabitants would require particularly important role to play here, given that they tend to
one three-tonne truck of food supplies entering the city every have a large influence over the evolution, design and planning
90 seconds to feed the population.119 This represents a major of urban infrastructure and local business regulations.
116
Lachat et al. (2012) FAO (2010)
117 118
Reardon (2016) Bayo (2006)
119
IFPRI (2016a)
120

5.4 Policies and processes of globalization
Policies implemented to drive forward economic globalization of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption per capita than
have wrought changes throughout the food system, in turn with countries that did not, controlling for GDP per capita and
significant implications for diet quality. Policies, notably the urbanization levels. This has led some to argue that globalization
process of trade liberalization, have influenced national food has been a driver of the obesity epidemic.127 Extensive
production, transport, processing and imports and exports and econometric analyses of several data sets show that globalization
investments between countries.121 This in turn has influenced is substantially and significantly associated with an increase in
food availability, prices, promotion and safety in different ways. the individual propensity to be overweight among women.128
Results from a quantitative analysis using a fixed-effects
Some have argued that these policies have reduced hunger.122 panel model indicate that the impact of trade openness and
The impacts on undernutrition are hard to trace but it foreign direct investment is positive and significant in low-
seems evident that there is potential for both coherence and middle-income countries.129
and incoherence between trade policy and undernutrition
outcomes.123 In food safety, trade liberalization likewise has Trends in recent decades in globalization, as measured by the
had both positive and negative implications.124 For forms of KOF Index of Globalization130 suggest that, while globalization
malnutrition associated with excess and imbalance, evidence appears to be levelling off globally, it is still increasing steadily
indicates that trade liberalization and foreign direct investment, in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, where current rates of
facilitated by advances in information and communication market penetration by large-scale food businesses and retailers
technology, have made it easier to make certain food and drink are relatively low. Given the growing demand for highly processed
products (e.g. oils, ultra-processed foods and sugar-sweetened and ultra-processed foods in the lower- and upper-middle-
beverages) more available to consumers in low- and middle- income countries (Chapter 3) and the relative lack of food-based
income countries.125 For example, a cross-country analysis126 dietary guidelines from these country groupings (Chapter 2),
estimated that low- and middle-income countries that enter they are likely to be targets for food processing and retailing
free trade agreements with the US have a 63% higher level companies seeking to grow their markets.
5.5 Climate change
There are important consequences of climate change for diet study published in the Lancet133 sheds some light on this issue.
in terms of adequacy and quality. Direct consequences include Using a coupled agriculture-health model, it is estimated that
rising temperatures, more volatile rainfall and the increased climate change over the period to 2050 will generate 529,000
incidence of extreme weather events that will adversely affect net additional deaths from diet-related causes compared to a
crop and livestock productivity. The impacts of these changes reference scenario of no climate change. Most of these deaths
will depend on the overall increase in greenhouse gases in the would occur in the low- and middle-income countries of the
atmosphere and associated rise in average global temperatures. Western Pacific and South-East Asia and would be due to
changes in the lower availability of fruits and vegetables which
Twenty years of global studies show crop yields to be negatively would lead to 534,000 climate-related deaths. These would far
affected by climate change in the tropical areas where hunger outweigh the health benefits associated with reductions in red
is most widespread.131 In general, they indicate that crop yields meat availability due to climate change (29,000 avoided deaths).
will increase in Northern Europe under a range of climate change In addition, other studies134 estimate that the global impacts of
scenarios. At a global level, Nelson et al.132 present results for elevated carbon dioxide on the zinc content of grains, tubers
nine economic models with common exogenous drivers for and legumes will place 138 million people at new risk of zinc
seven climate change scenarios across four crops (staples) and 13 deficiency (and hence at risk of diarrhoeal diseases) by 2050.
regions. They find most models predicted a significant increase Those likely to be most affected would be living in Africa and
in food prices that will reduce the affordability of foods. South Asia, with nearly 48 million in India.
From a diet quality perspective, it would be helpful to know Ocean acidification is a further consequence of climate change,
which foods are most vulnerable to climate change. A recent leading to a fall in the availability of oceanic calcium carbonate
121
Hawkes, Grace and Thow (2015); FAO (2004) 122Anderson (2010) 123Hawkes (2015); FAO (2015b) 124Hawkes (2015) 125Thow and Hawkes (2009); Baker, Kay and
Walls (2014); Hawkes et al. (2009) 126Stuckler et al. (2012) 127Malik, Willett and Hu (2013) 128Goryakin et al. (2015) 129Miljkovic et al. (2015) 130The KOF Index of
Globalization measures the three main dimensions of globalization: Economic, social and political. For more information see: http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/
131
Wheeler and Von Braun (2013) 132Nelson et al. (2014) 133Springmann et al (2016b) 134Myers et al. (2015)
used by marine species to build their shells. Seafood is a good the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
source of nutrients and omega-3 fatty acids which are beneficial held in Paris in December 2015.136 At this conference, all
to health (Chapter 2). The consequences of acidification include governments agreed to keep average global warming to well
a reduction in the availability of shellfish, losses of coral reefs below 2ºC and to aim towards 1.5ºC. This implies a significant
(which offer habitats to many fish species) and possible collapse cut in greenhouse gas emissions below current trends, to
of the krill fisheries in the Southern Ocean. Such adverse impacts avoid breaching the global carbon budget. If such policy shifts
on the oceans would aggravate the impact on marine ecosystems do indeed occur, they are likely to have a range of indirect
from overexploitation of many fish stocks and cut availability of consequences for diets. For example, a rise in energy costs
high-value nutrient-rich seafood.135 will have implications for the costs of fertilizer production,
food transport, trade, storage, processing and transformation,
Indirect effects on diet quality will be influenced by the although the net impacts on diet quality will be context specific
agreements made at the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP) to and are currently under-researched.137
5.6 Depletion of natural resources
The quantity and quality of food available depends on Agriculture relies heavily on freshwater from rainfall, groundwater
fundamental natural assets – soils, water and biodiversity – and and irrigation systems. In many areas, however, groundwater
how they are managed. The evolution of diets and food systems extraction has led to a large fall in the water table. The principal
will be constrained by natural resource availability and the grain producing regions of northwest India, northeast Pakistan,
intensity of natural resource use of different diets (see Chapter 3). northeast China and the Midwest of the US have all experienced
high rates of groundwater depletion.141 Currently, agriculture
As population and incomes grow, the world’s natural resource consumes more than 70% of freshwater but with rising demand
base is under increased pressure. For example, the last 50 years from industrial, energy and domestic uses, irrigation systems will
have seen significant degradation of soils in many parts of the need to adopt more water-efficient methods of use if food yields
world138 with the conversion of natural habitats into cropland are to be maintained. Climate change is expected to aggravate
and the intensive cultivation of inappropriate areas. The water shortages, increasing rainfall volatility and erosive run-off.
expansion of cropped areas has led to the erosion of biodiversity,
with potentially serious consequences for human health and In assessing the environmental implications of different dietary
well-being.139 Biodiversity is important as it constitutes a reservoir elements, as Chapter 2 shows, the manner in which particular
of genetic diversity from which future crops, medicines and foods are produced and processed matters. For example, the
livestock can be developed. The web of insects, soil micro-fauna carbon and water footprint of red meat from intensive, stall-
and other life forms, provides critical services for ensuring the reared cattle is very different to meat from extensive cattle herds,
production of crops and livestock. For example, estimates fed on natural pastures, whose dung is a valuable source of plant
have been made of the global impacts of a loss in pollination nutrients for local farmers.142
services by important insect species on the production of fruits,
vegetables and nuts and seeds and how this translates into Increased pressure on natural resources will constrain food
changes in micronutrient intake. Keeping calorie intake constant, production and may stimulate technical progress, while driving
they show that the reduction in the availability of these foods of diets in unpredictable and highly context-specific ways. The
high dietary value, arising from a 50% loss in pollination services, growing consensus on the need to price scarce resources, such
would be associated with an additional 700,000 deaths per year as water, should provide strong incentives both to increase
and 13.2 million DALYs per year due to increases in NCDs and the efficiency of resource use and to generate technical
micronutrient malnutrition.140 improvements.
McCauley et al. (2015) 136United Nations (2016a) 137Wheeler and Von Braun (2013)
135
FAO and ITPS (2015) 139Godfray and Garnett (2014) 140Smith et al. (2015) 141Whitmee et al. (2015)
138
Garnett (2014)
142

5.7 Implications
This chapter has briefly considered the main drivers that The food system becomes a place where tensions emerge, but where
will directly influence diet quality in the future. Drivers offer they can also be resolved. In the next chapter, we consider in more
both opportunities and threats for the attainment of detail how food systems work and the elements within them that
high-quality diets. could be levered to reorient the trajectory of diets into the future.
• Income growth will allow households to access more Policy makers need to think through systematically the possible
food and a more diverse basket of foods that contribute combination of contextual drivers that shape their own food
to a high-quality diet but it will also enable the purchase systems. But how should they then use this information? The
of a greater quantity and variety of food products that following chapters will highlight where policy makers should
undermine diet quality. look within their food systems to leverage them towards
high-quality diets (Chapter 6) and what they can do to achieve
• Urbanization offers greater convenience to consumers in terms that (Chapter 7).
of low-cost food prepared outside the home, but also creates
risks around food safety. Finally, we offer a typology (Table 5.2) for policy makers to
help with the identification of the diet issues that their specific
• Globalization offers investment opportunities for food contextual drivers are likely to push them towards. Table 5.2
businesses to generate incomes, activity and employment but presents 16 typologies of contextual drivers that can be applied
also makes foods high in sugar, salt and fats more available. at the national or subnational level. Guided by the analysis in
this chapter we identify four contextual stratifiers, each with
• Climate change policy should reduce the consumption of foods two values: low-middle-income; rural/urban; low-high-market
with a high carbon footprint. liberalization; and natural resource-rich/-poor.
There are thus genuine trade-offs and tensions to be resolved. Middle-income contexts tend to be less vulnerable to calorie
Moreover, all the aforementioned drivers are interrelated. For shortfalls (i.e. food takes up a smaller share of overall income)
example, higher incomes, urbanization and globalization are and ASF consumption (i.e. high-income elasticities), but remain
closely interconnected. vulnerable to low fruit and vegetable intake (because income
elasticities for these products tend to be lower) and to excess levels
Yet there is one place – albeit an extensive one – where these of red meat, excess calorie intake and salt, sugar and unhealthy
drivers converge to influence diet: the food system.143 fat intakes (due to increased purchasing power). Higher levels of
market liberalization reduce the transactions costs of marketing
• Income and population growth increases the demand for both fresh and processed foods. Urban contexts are more
food which places stresses on the food system; the food vulnerable to food and lifestyle choices that prioritize the intake
environments produced by food supply systems are influencing of prepared food and food away from home, foods that can be
what food is available to be purchased with new income and energy-dense and micronutrient-sparse and can be prepared in
how much food is purchased per capita. unsafe ways. Environments that are natural resource-poor144 can be
vulnerable to climatic variation (e.g. due to fragile water tables or
• Urbanization has a myriad of effects on food systems that lack of forest cover), have low levels of biodiversity, high population
influence diet quality, including taking land away from food density and overuse of scarce natural resource capital (e.g. due to
production while also providing hubs of innovation for new crop choices that require high levels of energy or water).
ways of producing food and by being the locus of mass retail
and ‘out of home’ food provisioning. Drawing on a range of evidence, Table 5.2 links these 16
typologies to 10 key features of high-quality diets as identified
• The processes of globalization have had a transformative in Chapter 2. The features cover calorie adequacy, the availability
impact on food systems by enabling the development of new of key foods that are markers for diet quality, food safety, climate
supply chain networks and changing food environments. resilience and natural resource use. The relevant stratifiers for
typologies and the diet quality priorities will vary by context:
• Climate change and natural resource depletion place stresses Table 5.2 presents an example for others to adapt and shows that
on food production and increase the volatility of supply; the different typologies lead to different sets of priorities for food
production of elements of a high-quality diet (e.g. meat for systems. The nature of the diet challenges generated by 4 of the
those with low levels of consumption) contributes to climate 16 typologies with suggestions for countries that contain these
change through increased CO2 emissions. contexts is provided in Box 5.1.
Seto and Ramankutty (2016) 144See Solability Sustainable Intelligence (2016) for an index of the natural capital of different countries. High-ranking countries are
143
characterized by the availability of abundant water combined with a tropical climate, rich biodiversity and availability of other natural resources.
Box 5.1: Underlying driver typologies and the dietary challenges they generate
Many low-income countries contain regions that reflect the forgetting about hunger in critical rural areas. Zambia is an
following typologies: Typology 1 – a context with low-income, example of a country that contains such a context. It is low-
rural, low-market liberalization and natural resource-poor income (at least in terms of poverty rates), is more urban than
people. Bangladesh is an example of a country that contains most sub-Saharan African countries, is natural resource-rich
this typology. Bangladesh is low-income, two-thirds rural, and has relatively high levels of globalization. It will still need
has a low level of natural capital and has relatively low levels to tackle hunger, while increasing the diversity of food group
of globalization according to the KOF Index.145 Clearly, consumption, address food safety issues in rapidly growing
hunger remains an issue in Bangladesh, diet quality is low urban areas and manage the availability and consumption of
and food systems need to be made more resilient. These ultra-processed foods, which tend to be energy-dense and low
are the challenges for the food system to address. But the in fibre and micronutrients.
context is complicated by the fact that one third of the
population is urban and in these areas, market liberalization Typology 13 contexts are medium-income, urban, high-
will be higher and dietary challenges will include the lowering market liberalization but natural resource-poor. They should
of consumption of some diet components. For example, focus primarily on increasing the consumption of fruits
Bangladesh has the 99th highest estimated prevalence of and vegetables, reducing the incentives to consume ultra-
diabetes (out of 193 countries). Countries increasingly have processed foods and pay extra attention to food safety and
to address multiple contexts within their borders. reducing ecological footprints. Egypt is an example of a
country containing this typology. It is a lower-medium-income
Typology 8 contexts are low-income, urban, high-market country; it has a relatively high percentage of its population
liberalization and natural resource-rich. They need to focus in urban areas, and is natural resource-poor with moderate to
more on improving diet diversity and food safety – while not high liberalization of markets. Calorie availability is very
TABLE 5.2: Contextual driver types and priorities for food system goals
Contextual Driver Types Example of Food System Goal
Incentivize
Address calorie Incentivize higher
higher ASF
shortfalls F&V intake
intake
1. Low income, rural, low market liberalization, natural resource poor Higher Higher Higher
2. Low income, rural, high market liberalization, natural resource poor Higher Higher Higher
3. Low income, rural, low market liberalization, natural resource rich Higher Higher Higher
4. Low income, rural, high market liberalization, natural resource rich Higher Higher Higher
5. Low income, urban, low market liberalization, natural resource poor Medium Medium Higher
6. Low income, urban, high market liberalization, natural resource poor Medium Medium Higher
7. Low income, urban, low market liberalization, natural resource rich Medium Medium Higher
8. Low income, urban, high market liberalization, natural resource rich Medium Medium Higher
9. Medium income, rural, low market liberalization, natural resource poor Medium Medium Higher
10. Medium income, rural, high market liberalization, natural resource poor Lower Lower Medium
11. Medium income, rural, low market liberalization, natural resource rich Medium Medium Higher
12. Medium income, rural, high market liberalization, natural resource rich Lower Lower Medium
13. Medium income, urban, low market liberalization, natural resource poor Lower Lower Medium
14. Medium income, urban, high market liberalization, natural resource poor Lower Lower Medium
15. Medium income, urban, low market liberalization, natural resource rich Lower Lower Medium
16. Medium income, urban, high market liberalization, natural resource rich Lower Lower Medium
ETH (2016)
145
IFPRI (2016a) Note: F&V refers to fruits and vegetable
146

Drivers offer both opportunities
high and is concentrated on staples. Fruit and vegetable and threats for the attainment
consumption needs to increase and overall calories need
to decrease. Food systems need to be resilient and to of high-quality diets.
reduce their ecological footprint given the reliance on
irrigated food production.
Typology 16 contexts are medium-income, urban,

high-market liberalization and natural resource-rich. We present this typology not as a definitive answer to the
They should focus on reducing ultra-processed food question of what should different food systems be focusing on.
intake and lowering red meat intakes, excess calorie Each context will generate its own drivers, types and priorities.
intakes, salt, added sugar and unhealthy fats intakes. But we do encourage policy makers and their teams to take
Extra attention should also be paid to food safety. the time to create a version of Table 5.2 that suits their national
Indonesia is an example of a country that contains this and subnational contexts. It is one way of identifying different
context. It is medium-income, majority urban, relatively typologies within their own country and making explicit
natural resource-rich and has relatively high levels of the breadth of food system outcomes they want to see. The
globalization. It is suffering from high levels of multiple construction and completion of such a typology can also serve
forms of malnutrition:146 stunting of children aged under as a way of identifying and reconciling competing priorities and
five, anaemia in women and adult overweight and trade-offs in an inclusive, consensus-building process.
obesity. It has many diet quality challenges and in fact
will contain many of the 16 driver typologies listed here As we will show in the following two chapters on food systems
within its borders. and food environments – and the policies that can shape them –
the need for inclusive and evidence-informed policy processes
is vital for making policy decisions that lead to the attainment
of food system goals.
Incentivize Incentivize lower

Incentivize Pay extra Increase climate Reduce ecological
reduced ultra- Reduce excess salt, added sugar,
lower red attention to food resilience of footprints of food
processed foods calorie intake unhealthy
meat intake safety food systems systems
intake fat intake
Lower Lower Lower Lower Lower Higher Higher
Medium Lower Lower Lower Medium Higher Higher
Lower Lower Lower Lower Lower Medium Medium
Medium Lower Lower Lower Medium Medium Medium
Medium Lower Lower Lower Medium Higher Higher
Higher Lower Lower Medium Higher Higher Higher
Medium Lower Lower Lower Medium Medium Medium
Higher Lower Lower Medium Higher Medium Medium
Medium Lower Lower Lower Lower Higher Higher
Higher Medium Medium Medium Medium Higher Higher
Medium Lower Lower Lower Lower Medium Medium
Higher Medium Medium Medium Higher Medium Medium
Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Higher Higher
Higher Higher Higher Higher Higher Higher Higher
Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium
Higher Higher Higher Higher Higher Medium Medium
Food systems and
diet quality
• Food systems comprise all the processes involved in keeping

us fed: The food supply, food environments and food consumers
all form part of the broader food system.
• The food supply system comprises interrelated subsystems which

take food from farm to fork, including agricultural production;
storage, transport and trade; transformation retail and provisioning.
• There has been a shift in the balance of food systems over past
decades – from “local systems” with short food chains and minimally
processed foods delivered in local markets or consumed by the
producing household towards more “global systems”. These have
long food chains involving multiple pathways and/or transformations
where consumers rely on the market to access food.
• Agricultural production has vital implications for diet quality

KEY MESSAGES
because it forms the basis of the foods that people eat. Evidence
shows the food availability from agriculture has increased and
foods other than staples have increased faster. But there is still
a bias in terms of investment and policy in the public and private
sectors towards a small number of staple crops.
• Foods produced by agriculture do not necessarily reach consumers

in the form in which they are harvested. They may be used as animal
feed, lost during storage, contaminated with food safety risks or
transformed into processed foods. The nature of these changes has
important implications for diet quality.
• Beyond agriculture, the food supply system influences which

foods move through the system and in what form, which are made
available and affordable to different people, and how safe they are.
6 Food systems and diet quality
In Chapter 1, we outlined what we mean by ‘the food system’. This chapter provides an in-depth view of the elements of food systems
and their implications for diet quality.
6.1 What are food systems?
Food systems comprise all the processes involved in keeping Consumers are an important part of food systems. They
us fed: growing, harvesting, packing, processing, transforming, eat the food produced by the system and, in so doing,
transporting, marketing, consuming and disposing of food. influence what the system produces. Food cultures – values,
They include the inputs needed and outputs generated at beliefs and social norms around food – play an important
each step. A food system operates within and is influenced by role in shaping what people eat and what they demand from
social, political, economic and natural environments.147 This the food system. Food choices and dietary patterns represent
and other definitions of food systems148 emphasize that food a central aspect of human societies and have strong symbolic
systems produce food, that they are made up of a broad set of value in the development of personal and social identities.
components from production to consumption and that they Consumer incomes and other socio-economic characteristics
are influenced by external social, political and other drivers. also play a key role in what people can afford to buy. Food
Food systems also produce outputs, which are not food as skills and literacy also influence food production, purchasing
by-products or co-products – such as ethanol (for fuel). and consumption.
FIGURE 6.1: Conceptual framework for the links between diet quality and food systems
Drivers of food systems
su pply system
Food
Agricultural
production
Food Food storage,
transport and
subsystem environment trade subsystem
Consumer
Nutrient Preferences Time
quality & Food
taste of labelling
Diet
available quality
food
Knowledge
Physical Purchasing
access power Food
to food promotion
Food retail and Food
provisioning Food transformation
subsystem price subsystem
Eames-Sheavly et al. (2011) 148Neff, Merrigan and Wallinga (2015); Babu and Blom (2014); Ericksen (2008); Reardon and Timmer (2012); Sobal, Khan and Bisogni
147
(1998); Combs et al. (1996); HLPE (2014); Dixon (2015)
82 Chapter 6: Food systems and diet quality

However, in a two-way street, food systems in turn play a role income for farmers and the rest of the economy through
in shaping consumer food preferences, attitudes and beliefs multiplier effects.
and therefore food cultures more broadly.149 They influence
what consumer’s decide to acquire and eat and, therefore, their 2) Food storage, transport and trade subsystem, in which
diet quality. This is because they shape what can be termed food is handled, treated, stored, packed, moved, transported
‘food environments’ – the foods available to people in their and traded. This subsystem starts immediately after food
surroundings as they go about their everyday lives and the is harvested, which is often on the farm. It also involves all
nutritional quality, safety, price, convenience and promotion aspects of moving and transporting food products from
of these foods. Food environments play an important role in production to consumption and provides the physical links
shaping diets because they provide the choices from which between the other food subsystems.
people make decisions about what to eat; they constrain and
signal what people can acquire and, as a consequence, influence 3) Food transformation subsystem, in which produced foods
the decisions people make.150 Food environments circumscribe are transformed into final products, which can occur at the
how income can be spent on food.151 postharvest stage and/or later. Although many crops such
as roots, fruits and vegetables can go almost straight from
Underpinning these food environments are food supply systems. field to retail, much of the food produced enters the food
Often referred to as the ‘food supply chain’ or ‘food value chain’” transformation subsystem and is first processed in some way.
they are in fact a series of interlinked and interacting subsystems How food is processed has a strong influence on the form in
that create food environments. Four of the core subsystems which foods are available for consumers. This subsystem also
can be categorized as follows (Figure 6.1). includes the marketing of these products.
1) Agricultural production subsystem, which represents 4) Food retail and provisioning subsystem, comprises the
the primary production of foods and related inputs, including actors who move products through the market into the hands
the production of arable crops, horticulture, animals and of the consumer. Markets, informal retail, street vendors,
fish. It is vitally important as it provides the basis of what foods supermarkets and small stores are where the majority of the
are available to the rest of the food system and generates world’s population acquires their food.
6.2 Changes in food systems
Food systems across the globe are highly diverse. They comprise • From producing foods direct for the cooking pot to
‘local systems’ made up of ‘short food chains’ with minimally producing ingredients for food processing. Raw ingredients
processed foods delivered in local markets or consumed by the from agriculture are increasingly transformed through
producing household, ‘global systems’ with ‘long food chains the food system. Soya oil can become a trans fat; chicken can
involving multiple pathways and/or transformations’ and be combined with vegetable oils and refined carbohydrates
'everything in between.152 to make ultra-processed food; and fruits can be used as an
ingredient in processed foods high in sugar. Many ingredients
While food systems remain diverse, there has been a significant from agriculture are also transformed into an increasingly
shift in the balance over past decades towards ‘long chain’ diverse array of non-food products such as biofuels.
models. This means that more food is transported, traded and
transformed after it leaves the farm, leading to a shift in emphasis • From growing food to eat, to buying it. The most recent
away from the farm into later food supply systems – sometimes available data show that in most low-middle-income countries,
referred to as the ‘middle of the chain.’ These food supply chains the majority of food is not grown by the households that
are increasingly complex, specialized, and have strong vertical consume it, but acquired from the market through the food
links between production stages.153 The main shifts have been: retail and provisioning subsystem (Figure 6.2).154
• Distancing between production and consumption, from • An increase in role and power of the private sector relative
shorter to longer chain food systems, in which consumers to the public sector. As food chains have lengthened and
are physically further from the point of production. food transformation increased, enormous opportunities have
Hawkes et al. (2015) 150Swinburn, Egger and Raza (1999); Glanz et al. (2005); Story et al. (2008); Swinburn et al. (2011); Vandevijvere and Swinburn (2015); Hawkes
149
et al. (2015); Herforth and Ahmed (2015) 151Herforth and Ahmed (2015) 152FAO (2013); Brunori et al. (2016) 153FAO (2013) 154Note, the World Bank LSMS unit
informs us that comparable time series data for the value of food are not available.
grown for private sector investment in the food system. Today, (e.g. 85% in the United States),156 in low-middle-income
the private sector – ranging from farmers to huge transnational countries, these middle segments have grown to form
corporations – is the main actor in the food system. The power 30–40% of the value added and costs in food value chains.157
and concentration of large agribusinesses, manufacturers and Human labour in agriculture remains extensive, although
retailers, has grown. This in turn means that power structures the development of mechanical, chemical and biological
in food systems have changed, which not only influences what technologies has enabled substitutions for labour in the field.
is produced, but political decision making.155 There has been a concomitant shift away from labour in the
home to the middle of the chain, reflecting shifts towards the
• A shift of value, labour and power to the middle of the use of technology in food preparation, as well as additional
food chain. Though still far less than high-income countries food processing and preparation in the food system.
FIGURE 6.2: Percentage of household value of food consumed by source of acquisition

Paraguay 2000
Colombia 2010
Swaziland 2009
Zimbabwe 2007
Madagascar 2005
Brazil 2008
Turkey 2012
Poland 2012
Panama 2008
São Tomé & Príncipe 2000
Jamaica 2007
Honduras 2004
Bolivia 2002
Haiti 2012
Iraq 2012
India 2011
Albania 2008
Ukraine 2013
Armenia 2013
El Salvador 2010
Serbia 2010
Yemen 2005
Maldives 2004
Nicaragua 2005
Guatemala 2000
Bangladesh 2010
Pakistan 2010
Kosovo 2011
Croatia 2004
Mongolia 2012
Peru 2010
Côte d’Ivoire 2008
Bhutan 2012
Kenya 2005
Afghanistan 2007
Cameroon 2007
Zambia 2010
Romania 2012
Benin 2003
Mali 2006
Tanzania 2011
Guinea, People's Rep. 2007
Moldova 2012
Malawi 2010
Niger 2007
Uganda 2012
Ethiopia 2010
Papua New Guinea 2009
Mozambique 2008
0 20 40 60 80 100
■ Purchased ■ Home produced ■ Received
Source: Data compiled by the World Bank, LSMS team.
155
IPES-Food (2015) 156
Canning (2013) Reardon (2015)
157

6.3 Elements of food supply systems relevant to diet quality
In each of the parts of the food supply system illustrated in a small number of these elements and why they matter for
Figure 6.1, there is a wide range of different elements relevant diet quality. The elements exemplified are summarized in
to diet quality. In each case, their influence is exerted through Table 6.1 and discussed further in Chapter 7 as food system
their impact on ‘food environments’. Here we exemplify entry points for policy.
TABLE 6.1: Examples of food supply systems elements that have the potential to influence diet quality via
food environments
Subsystem and element Why it matters for diet quality
Agricultural production
1) Degree of diversity of production Can have direct impact on availability of diverse foods for farmer households and local diets
where people are served by short-chain food systems reliant on local production; provides the
global pool from which all foods are made
2) Amount (quantity) of production
Drives the quantity of different foods available for human consumption globally
of different foods and ingredients
3) Productivity of different foods and
Key influence over the amount of production of different foods and ingredients
ingredients
4) Agricultural research investments Influences productivity of different crops and the nature of the crop production systems
Storage, transport and trade
5) Degree of food losses and waste Influences the degree to which different foods produced by agriculture can reach consumers
6) Contamination with food safety risks Influences whether food is safe
7) Transport infrastructure Influences availability and prices of different foods
8) Imports and exports Influences availability and prices of different foods, including by providing ingredients for food processing
Transformation
Influences the type of food processing, which in turn affects whether ingredients produced by
9) Investment in food processing
agriculture are transformed into food, which contribute to high diet quality or undermines it
10) Degree and type of food advertising

Influences the appeal of different foods to consumers
and promotion
Retail and provisioning
11) Degree of traditional vs. modern retail Influences convenience in physical access to different types of foods, prices and food safety
6.3.1 Agricultural production a broad range of other food system outcomes. We recognize the
central importance of this question but do not deal with it here.
Agricultural production produces the foods and ingredients that
form the basis of the quantity and diversity of foods available for The first key element in the agricultural production subsystem
human consumption. What is produced has vital significance for we exemplify as potentially important for diet quality is the
diet quality. There are a large number of elements of agricultural diversity of production i.e. what crops are being grown and
production subsystems that have implications for diet quality. raised other than staples such as starchy roots. In local short
We focus on just four: (1) diversity of production; (2) amount of chains, the diversity of local production can affect local diets. In
different foods grown, raised and caught; (3) degree of productivity; the shortest of chains – i.e. when producers consume their own
and (4) agricultural research. Cutting across these four elements is production – there is evidence that increasing on-farm diversity
the question of how foods are produced, which also has significant can have a strong impact on dietary diversity among subsistence-
implications for not just what is produced, but how safe it is and oriented producer households.158 At the landscape level, where
158
Kumar, Harris and Rawat (2015); Jones, Shrinivas and Bezner-Kerr (2014); Dillon, McGee and Oseni (2015); Hoddinott, Headey and Dereje (2015);
Sibhatu, Krishna and Quam (2015)
past decades.160 Nevertheless, FAOSTAT data indicate that
There is evidence that increasing there have been changes in the amount of different foods that
on-farm diversity can have a are produced (Figure 6.3). This is the second element we identify
as important for diet quality. Figure 6.3 shows that between
strong impact on dietary diversity 1961 and 2011, total calorie availability increased globally and
in all regions. The proportion that has come from non-staple
among subsistence-oriented foods has also increased, except in the US and more recently
in Europe, where this has remained constant at a relatively high
producer households. value (Figure 6.3).161 The amount of staples (cereals and starchy
roots) has not increased per capita since the mid-1980s (i.e.
increased in total, but not per person), while the quantity of
linkages to more distant markets are weak, production diversity most of other foods has (Figure 6.4). Steady increases have been
can also be associated with dietary diversity.159 But food is often seen in the availability of vegetable oils, various ASF and fruits
sold on to markets far away from the location of production and and vegetables. However, some regions show very little change
where producers do participate in markets, the role of on-farm in food availability patterns over this 50-year period.
production diversity is less significant in contributing to improved
diet quality. The diversity that is available to non-farm
households is a function of a combination of local, national
The degree of diversity of
and global markets, not what is just produced locally. This
in turn reflects what is produced nationally and globally.
production of broad food
groups has changed very little
When measured at a global level, the degree of diversity of
production of broad food groups has changed very little over over past decades.
FIGURE 6.3: Percentage of energy from non-staple foods and total dietary energy per capita by region, 1961–2011
90%
80%
70%
Dietary energy from foods other than cereal
grains and starchy roots (% of total)
■ United States
60% ■ European Union
■ World average
■ East Asia
50% ■ SE Asia
■ Africa
■ South Asia
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Total dietary energy supply from all foods (calories/capita/year)
Source: Masters (2016)
159
Duriaux and Baudron (2015) 160Remans et al. (2014); Khoury and Jarvis (2014) 161FAO food balance sheets provide a picture of national food availability for human
consumption by taking total production of different commodities and adjusting these for imports, exports and food losses during storage and transportation, from
which average per capita food availability can then be estimated.

FIGURE 6.4: Global per capita availability per day (kcal) from different foods: 1961, 1986 and 2011
1500
■ 1961
1200 ■ 1986
■ 2011
kcal/capita/day
900
600
300
Fish & seafood

sugar & sweeteners
vegetable oils
Treenuts
Cereals &
starchy roots
Sugar crops &
Pulses
Oilcrops &
Animal fats
Fruits &
vegetables
Eggs
Red meat
Poultry meat
Milk
Source: Compiled by the authors, data compiled from FAOSTAT (FAO, 2015a)
Behind these global changes are large regional variations. East the percentage of calories from sources other than cereals and
Asia (dominated by China, Japan and South Korea) has shown starchy roots has doubled, from 25% to 50%. This shift from
the biggest transformation. In the 1961–2011 period, per capita a calorie profile dominated by cereals towards a much more
calorie availability increased from 1600 to just over 3000 and diverse set of calories sources is illustrated by Figure 6.5.
FIGURE 6.5: East Asia, 1961–2011, calories from different categories
■ Cereals (excl beer) & starchy roots ■ Oil crops & veg oils ■ Meat ■ Fish & seafood
■ Sugar crops & sugar & sweeteners ■ Fruits (excl wine) & veg ■ Animal fats ■ Miscellaneous
■ Pulses ■ Alcoholic beverages ■ Milk (excl butter) & eggs
3500
3000
2500
kcal/capita/day
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1961
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
Source: Compiled by the authors, data compiled from FAOSTAT (FAO, 2015a)
South-East Asia is the next most transformed region, with per of production. They tend to have shorter breeding cycles than
capita calorie availability increasing from 1800 to 2700 and ruminants and so selection for particular traits, such as yield,
the percentage of calories from sources other than cereals and delivers results more quickly. Intensive poultry production
starchy roots increasing from 25% to 40% over the 1961–2011 systems also use less land.166
period. South Asia and Africa have shown mainly increased
calorie intakes over this period (Africa: from 2000 calories to 2700 Productivity is not the only source of growth. For example,
and the percentage from non-cereals and starchy roots increased increases in palm oil production is largely a result of increasing
from only 34% to 37%, while for South Asia, the corresponding land allocation. It has been calculated that area expansion has
figures are 2300 to 2500 calories and 34% to 40%). accounted for well over 90% of palm production growth in
Indonesia and 77% in Malaysia.167
A core driver of the quantity of foods produced is productivity.
Between 1960 and 2000, productivity growth in low- and middle- Increases in productivity reflect another element of the
income countries saw cereal and crop yields rise substantially,162 agricultural production subsystem we identify as potentially
while that of legumes declined.163 This has been reflected in important: agricultural research.168 For many years, investment
increases in cereals and declines in legume availability, although into agricultural research has focused on a small number of
the latter has started to increase and cereals have stabilized cereals.169 The Consortium of International Agricultural Research
(Figure 6.4). Since the mid-1980s, the rate of increase in Centers (CGIAR), which commands the most significant
productivity has slowed but productivity per unit of input (e.g. capacity to conduct agricultural R&D in low- and medium-
breeds, feeds) as well as unit of land – i.e. total factor productivity income countries, still allocates about half of its resources
(TFP) – has risen.164 In 2001–10, increases in TFP accounted for to rice and maize (Figure 6.6). In the private sector, about 45%
more than three-quarters of the total growth in agricultural of research investment is directed towards just one crop: maize.170
output worldwide.165 This share is considerably higher than maize seed’s 25% share
of the overall seed market, but reflects the industry’s experience
In meat, increasing productivity has played a fundamental that maize seed is the most profitable seed to produce. Other
role in the rising supply. Increases in edible output per unit of crops have received relatively little funding. Notably, global
livestock have arisen from developments in feeding, breeding funding for pulse crop productivity is estimated to be
and housing. The shift to poultry meat is because poultry is more far less than invested in maize171 and comes mostly from
readily scalable than ruminants and delivers greater efficiencies the public sector.172
FIGURE 6.6: CGIAR research funding allocated to specific crops in 2012 (in US$ million)
Rice
Maize
Wheat
Livestock and fish
Cassava
Bananas & plantains
Sweet potatoes
Potatoes
Yams
Groundnut
Chickpea
Sorghum
Beans
Pigeonpea
Soybean
Cowpea
Pearl millet
Lentil
Faba bean
Roots, other
Finger millet
Barley
0 20 40 60 80 100
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on data in Khoury and Jarvis (2014)
162
For example 208% for wheat, 109% for rice, 157% for maize, 78% for potatoes and 36% for cassava 163Evenson and Gollin (2003); Pingali (2012) 164TFP is the ratio of
total output to total inputs in a production process. It increases if more food is produced per unit of aggregated inputs or total inputs 165Fuglie and Rada (2013)
166
Garnett (2016) 167Villoria et al. (2013) 168Thirtle, Lin and Piesse (2003); Pardey, Alston and Piggott (2006) 169Bereuter and Glickman (2015) 170Fuglie et al. (2011);
Cavalieri (2011) 171Murrell (2016) 172Particularly CGIAR, USAID and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

6.3.2 Storage, transport and trade subsystem the warm and humid climate of many low- and
middle-income countries as well the seasonality that leads
After foods and ingredients are produced, they are stored and to unsaleable gluts; losses mean that over half of fruits and
packed and/or subject to treatment of some type (e.g. drying, vegetables produced in low-income countries are never
washing, cooling, ripening) and then transported and traded. consumed, compared to 20% for cereals.175 Legumes
Elements of this subsystem that are potentially important for are generally more difficult to store than cereals and are
diet quality include the degree of postharvest losses and waste, more subject to losses from pests.
contamination with food safety risks, transport infrastructure
and imports and exports. Food safety risks also occur throughout the food supply
subsystem (Table 6.3). As with food loss and waste, food safety
Table 6.2 illustrates how food is lost across the food system, risks begin with production, particularly for livestock systems
starting with production all the way to consumption.173 In where animal parasites, pathogens and toxins affecting consumer
middle- and high-income countries, much food is wasted at health enter the system.176 Postharvest is particularly critical in
the later parts of the food system. However, in low-income influencing whether these hazards are eliminated or spread and
countries, postharvest losses are particularly significant can also be where new hazards are introduced. For example,
and even in high-income countries, the majority of food aflatoxins are toxins produced by fungi that attack cereals and
waste occurs before the household gets it (Figure 6.7). groundnuts in the field and represent a serious food safety
This has implications for diet quality because it influences hazard for low-income populations who consume relatively large
the quantity of different type of foods produced by agriculture quantities of staples (such as maize and groundnuts) in tropical
that pass through the system. Crops that have high losses regions.177 While aflatoxins do appear in the production stage,
during the postharvest period are important for basic poor postharvest practices (mostly related to poor drying) and
dietary adequacy in low-income countries e.g. rice, cassava, storage conditions can increase aflatoxin prevalence. If the storage
groundnuts, as well as perishable foods vital for high diet environment is humid and warm, crop infection and cross-
quality e.g. fruits and vegetables and milk.174 The crops which contamination can occur as if the grain is not well dried prior
have the highest levels of losses are fruits and vegetables due to to storage, it can be an ideal environment for fungal growth.178
TABLE 6.2: Food loss and waste along the value chain
Handling Processing Distribution
Production Consumption
and storage and packaging and market
Definition
During distribution to Losses in the home or
During or immediately After produce leaves the During industrial or
markets, including losses business of the consumer,
after harvesting on farm for handling, storage, domestic processing and/
at wholesale and retail including restaurants/
the farm and transport or packaging
markets caterers
Includes
Milk spilled during Edible produce sorted
Fruits bruised during Edible food eaten Edible products sorted out
pasteurization and out due to quality of
picking or threshing by pests due to quality
processing (e.g., cheese) vegetables
Crops sorted out at post Edible fruit or grains

Edible produce degraded Edible products expired Food purchased
harvest for not meeting sorted out as not suitable
by fungus or disease before being purchased but not eaten
quality standards for processing
Crops left behind in fields

Livestock death during Livestock trimming during
due to poor mechanical Edible products spilled or Food cooked
transport to slaughter or slaughtering and industrial
harvesting or sharp drops damaged in market but not eaten
not accepted for slaughter processing
in prices
Fish discarded during Fish that are spilled or Fish spilled or damaged
fishing operations degraded after landing during smoking
Source: Lipinski et al. (2013)
Lipinski et al. (2013)

173
FAO (2011)
174
FAO (2011)
175
Grace (2015)
176
Unnevehr and Grace (2015)
177
Unnevehr and Grace (2015); Global Panel (2016b)
178
Transport infrastructure is an element of the food system that FIGURE 6.7: Per capita food losses and waste at
matters for diet quality because of its role in perishable food consumption and pre-consumption stages (kg/year)
systems. Underdeveloped and unreliable national electric
in different regions
and transport grids in low- and middle-income countries can
make cold storage of perishables both difficult and expensive, ■ Consumer ■ Production to retailing
so reducing the incentive to make them available and adding 300
significant costs. For example, in the Indonesian archipelago in
the mid-2000s, the inadequacy of the local transport grid meant 250
that procurement of fruits from rural areas was more expensive
than procurement from Thailand.179 Similarly, Mexico imports
200
20% of its fresh fruit and vegetable produce due to cheaper
cross-border procurement systems.180 This can also be the
kg/year
case for staples. For example, evidence indicates it is easier 150
to import broken Thai rice to consumers in Dakar than to
transport local production from irrigated rice production 100
in the Senegal River Valley.181
50
This indicates the importance of the amount, type and
destination of food imports and exports. According to FAO, 0
the value of global food exports has grown almost three-fold
Europe
Industrialized
Asia
Sub-Saharan Africa
North Africa,
West & Central Asia
South &
Southeast Asia
Latin America
North America,
Oceania
between 2000 and 2012 and by around 60% in terms of volume
in the same period and this trend is predicted to continue.182
While cereals have historically been the most traded food, other
commodities have become more important. Trade in fish and
seafood has increased and is now among the most traded of
all food commodities from a value perspective, exceeding the Source: FAO (2011), Figure 2
combined trade value of sugar, maize, coffee, rice and cocoa.183
International trade in fruits and vegetables has expanded at
a higher rate than trade in other agricultural commodities, Trade has also affected the inputs and ingredients used in food
particularly since the 1980s. Not only has world trade in fruits production. Imports of animal feed have been shown to be a
and vegetables gained prominence but also the variety of direct stimulus to greater meat production while sugar and a
commodities has expanded. In the vegetable oil market, trade variety of products are imported to produce ultra-processed
has facilitated the greater availability of soya and palm oil and foods.185 This means many processed foods that are produced
in the meat market, of dark chicken meat.184 locally use ingredients sourced globally.
TABLE 6.3: Examples of food safety risks in the food supply subsystem
Food supply subsystem Examples of food safety risks
Agricultural production If the fields are sprayed with contaminated water for irrigation, fruits and vegetables can be
contaminated before harvest. Livestock may be infected by parasites and pathogens that can affect
human nutrition and health.
Food storage, transport and trade If refrigerated food is left on a loading dock in warm weather, it could reach temperatures that allow
bacteria to grow. Peanut butter can become contaminated if roasted peanuts are stored in unclean
conditions or come into contact with contaminated raw peanuts.
Food transformation During the slaughter process, pathogens on an animal’s hide that came from the intestines can get
into the final meat product.
Food retail and provisioning If a food worker continues to work while he or she is sick and does not wash his or her hands carefully
after using the toilet, he or she can spread pathogens by touching food.
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2015)
179
Natawidjaja, Reardon and Shetty (2007) 180Reardon (2004)
181
Del Pozo-Vergnes and Vorley (2015) 182FAO (2015b) 183Asche et al. (2015) Hawkes (2010)
184 185
Hawkes (2010)

The diet quality implications of imports are both positive and All processed foods require investment in technology and facilities
negative.186 First, importing food can make it easier and cheaper required to produce them. For example, the production of one
to access a more diverse food supply, thus potentially boosting of the world’s most consumed ultra-processed foods, instant
diet quality. Yet benefits may not accrue to low-income countries noodles, involves 13 different steps from entering to leaving the
where diets are least diverse. One recent cross-country study factory.192 If the focus of processing in one of the world’s largest
indicated that food imports are associated with a more diverse food companies (listed in Appendix 5, Table 6.1) is an indicator,
food supply in high- and middle-income countries, but not in low- a large proportion of investment in processing dollars goes into
income countries.187 Second, while many foods associated with grain-based foods, snacks and confectionery. In addition to the
high diet quality have been increasingly traded, fruit and vegetable four companies with highly diversified portfolios that include
trade tends to focus on exporting from low- and middle-income them, six companies focus on grain-based and baked products,
countries to high-income countries, where supply is less of a three on snacks, sweets/candy and/or soft drinks. Four focus
problem.188 Third, while imports can boost adequacy of supply, on meat, including processed meats and four focus on dairy,
they have also facilitated the manufacturing and availability of including products with added sugars. These companies are
ultra-processed foods in low- and middle-income countries.189 growing fastest in low- and middle-income countries, where they
are often market leaders and have clear strategies to drive further
More trade has both negative and positive implications for growth.193
food safety.190 On the negative side, increased food trade may
introduce new safety hazards, revive previously controlled risks The power and concentration of these companies have grown
and spread contaminated food widely. Although most food over time. For example, in Latin America, the market shares of
imported into low-income countries can be reliably considered the four largest firms in the carbonated soft drinks and sweet and
of higher sanitary quality than food in the domestic markets, low- savoury snacks markets are over 60%.194 This in turn reflects foreign
income countries may also be more vulnerable to illegal imports direct investment by high-income countries’ food manufacturing
of unsafe food. On the positive side, there have been important companies into low- and middle-income countries. Figure 6.8
evolutions in public regulation of food safety of imported shows the scale of Coca-Cola’s foreign and direct investment since
products, especially perishable animal and plant products, which 2010. These processes enable companies to produce sugary, fatty
are most associated with foodborne disease. For example, the SPS and salty foods at lower cost and make them more available in
Agreement is reported to have increased the use of scientific risk low- and middle-income countries. It also stimulates competition
assessment in the formulation of food safety measures. with local ‘b-brands’ thus further stimulating the market195
and/or encouraging foreign expansion of firms from lower-middle-
6.3.3 Food transformation subsystem income countries into low-income countries.196 For example, JBS,
a Brazilian meat company, has purchased numerous companies
Many of the ingredients produced by agriculture are processed in in the United States, Australia and Europe and is now rated as the
some way in the food transformation subsystem, meaning they world’s third largest food company (Appendix 5).
reach consumers in a different form to when they were grown,
raised or caught.191 For example, maize is processed into high One of the outcomes of larger food processing companies
fructose corn syrup and many arable crops become animal feed. is greater ability and incentive to develop highly differentiated
As discussed in Chapter 1, there is a diversity of processing with products in a cost-efficient manner.197 The number of new
mixed implications for diet quality. Some forms of processing and rebranded products produced by these companies has
can help increase food availability, extend seasonality through steadily increased over time. For example, in 2012, the
the hunger gap and make food safer to eat. Food fortification Coca-Cola Company had more than 3500 products in their
can also add nutritional value. Yet processing can also lower the global portfolio. Owing to consumer concern about the
nutritional quality of products, such as producing trans fats from nutritional quality of ultra-processed foods and drinks, this
soya oil, chicken nuggets from plain chicken and ultra-processed includes growth of varieties with reduced calorie content; 800
foods from a range of different ingredients so they become high of their 3500 products were low- and no-calorie beverages in
in energy-dense, free sugars and unhealthy fats and salt, and low 2012 and in 2011 alone, the company launched more than 100
in dietary fibre. low- and no-calorie beverages.198 However, full calorie versions
remain their core brand.
Elements that are potentially significant for diet quality in
the food transformation subsystem include the allocation A second key element of the food transformation subsystem
of investments into different types of food processing and for diet quality is the advertising and other forms of promotion
advertising and other forms of promotion. of these products. This is a fundamental part of the food
186
UNSCN (2015) 187Remans et al. (2014) 188Huang (2010) 189Baker, Kay and Walls (2014) 190Hawkes et al. (2015)
191
Hawkes et al. (2012) 192WINA (2016) 193e.g. Mondelēz International (2016a); Mondelēz International (2016b)
194
PAHO (2015) 195Wei and Cacho (2001) 196Dawar and Frost (1999) 197Hatanaka, Bain and Busch (2006) 198Cited in Hawkes (2014)
transformation subsystem because the ability to promote Like all food supply subsystems, there is a tremendous diversity in
products is a powerful incentive to produce them in the first retail and other forms of provisioning. One distinction is between
place. This is particularly important in low- and middle-income “traditional” and “modern” retail.
countries so that products previously unfamiliar to consumers
can be promoted. Promotion is the process by which information The degree of distribution between different forms of food
about newly innovated products is communicated. Food and retail and provisioning influences diet quality. A number of
beverage companies spend large amounts on advertising, communities, particularly in rural or poor urban areas, are
accounting (including alcohol retail) for 17% of global media still heavily dependent on local “wet markets” for fruits and
spending in 2012.199 Coca Cola and Nestlé, which were among the vegetables, livestock products and staples.204 However, in a
top 10 largest global advertisers in 2014, together spent US$6.21 growing number of low- and middle-income countries, the
billion200 – equivalent in size to almost two-thirds of the entire modern retail sector is shaping physical access to food.205 Modern
UK overseas aid budget. A recent review201 of food marketing food retail channels include convenience stores and supermarkets
practices concludes that food promotion in high-income (including hypermarkets and discount stores) and these are
countries has been geared towards increased access to cheaper, gradually replacing traditional retail outlets, including outdoor
bigger and tastier calorie-dense food. Much consumer influencing wet markets, food/drink/tobacco specialists, independent small
is conducted “below the radar” using less obvious methods than grocers and other grocery retailers.
advertising, such as brand association, sensory complexity, the
size and shape of portions, packages and serving containers. This trend has different implications for different kinds of
These practices are also following similar patterns in low- and food. Nearly 60% of processed food is distributed through
middle-income countries.202 There is convincing evidence that supermarkets, which are spreading rapidly in the upper-
advertising influences food choice among children.203 middle-income countries. Figure 6.9 shows how modern retail
is beginning to dominate processed food distribution in upper-
6.3.4 Food retail and provisioning subsystem middle-income countries, while lower-middle-income countries,
in common with low-income countries, continue to rely on
The point where most consumers meet the food supply system traditional retail outlets for processed foods and soft drinks.206
is the food retail and provisioning subsystem – the markets
that sell the food that has been produced, transported, The effect of modern retail on the accessibility of fresh foods has
traded and transformed in earlier subsystems. Food retailing been rather different. Figure 6.10 shows that the share of fresh
and provisioning (e.g. supply of food through schools and foods in supermarkets in different country income types has
restaurants) is critical for diet quality because it influences all been relatively constant over the past 15 years, which suggests
aspects of food environments i.e. what food is available to people, that supermarket growth has not had much impact on retail
its nutritional quality, safety, price, convenience and promotion. patterns for these commodities. One factor thought to be holding
FIGURE 6.8: Coca-Cola's International Investments
China
$4b
2015-2017 Philippines
Mexico India $1.2b
$12.4b $5b 2015-2020
2010-2020 Africa 2012-2020
$17b
2010-2020 Indonesia
Brazil $500m
$7.6b in 2015
2012-2016
Source: Taylor and Jacobson (2016)
AdvertisingAge (2013) 200Statista (2016) 201Chandon and Wansink (2012) 202Hawkes (2002); Taylor and Jacobson (2016) 202Hastings et al. (2003); Hastings et al.
199
(2006); McGinnis, Gootman and Kraak (2006); Cairns, Angus and Hastings (2009) 204Gómez and Ricketts (2013) 205Reardon et al. (2003) 206PAHO (2015)

FIGURE 6.9: Total processed food distribution by modern vs. traditional channels in country income groups,
2001–14 calculated as a percentage of total retail value
80 ■ 2001
70 ■ 2008
Distribution share (%)
■ 2014
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Modern Traditional Modern Traditional Modern Traditional
High-income Upper-middle-income Lower-middle-income
Source: Baker (2016) based on data from Euromonitor

Note: Modern grocery retail channels include convenience stores and supermarkets (including hypermarkets and discounters); traditional channels include food/
drink/tobacco specialists, independent small grocers and other grocery retailers.
FIGURE 6.10: Fresh food distribution by modern vs. traditional retail channels by country income groups,
2006–14, calculated as a percentage of total volume
80 ■ 2006
70 ■ 2010
Distribution share (%)
■ 2014
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Modern Traditional Modern Traditional Modern Traditional
High-income Upper-middle-income Lower-middle-income
Source: Baker (2016) based on data from Euromonitor

Note: Country income-categories included only the following – high-income countries were Australia, Germany, Japan, Russian, UK and US; upper-middle-
income countries, Brazil, China, Mexico and South Africa; and the lower-middle-income countries, India and Morocco.
back greater positive benefits from supermarket growth on fresh to 28%). This has been shown to be a risk factor for higher fat
food consumption are the logistic and cold chain challenges of intake and low micronutrients in high-, middle- and low-income
penetrating the fresh food sector.207 It may also be that traditional country settings.210 One source of eating outside of the home is
outdoor markets remain highly cost competitive for fresh fruits and from street vendors. Evidence suggests that while street vendors
vegetables and can be easier to access by low-income groups.208 offer affordable food, it is often high in fat and salt.211
Another form of food provisioning is the food outlet that Food safety is a growing issue in low- and middle-income countries
serves ready-to-eat food, such as street vendors and fast food and has particular relevance at the retail level, where food sellers
restaurants/chains. The consumption of food outside the home is are often subject to safety restrictions and inspections. While
growing rapidly in low- and middle-income countries, especially it is often thought that supermarkets and other advances in
in urban areas. For example in Brazil,209 the national 2008–09 retail make food safer, this is not always the case in low- and
survey found that 18% of calories were purchased outside the middle-income country settings.212 The Global Panel has recently
home (and for adult men in the top income quartile this rose summarized the challenges and opportunities for policy makers in
improving food safety at this and other levels in the food system.213
Neven et al. (2006); Reardon, Timmer and Berdegue (2004) 208Gómez and Ricketts (2013) 209Bezerra et al. (2013)
207
Lachat et al. (2012) 211Steyn et al. (2014) 212Blackmore, Alonso and Grace (2015); Roesel and Grace (2014) 213Global Panel (2016b)
210
6.4 Implications
Food supply systems are complex and dynamic. Their influence to which the system is supporting the delivery of high-quality
on diet quality goes well beyond agricultural production into diets versus lower-quality diets.
food storage, transport and trade, transformation, retail and
other forms of provisioning. The influence of food supply systems Food availability can be linked to prices and affordability. For
on diet quality occurs via food environments i.e. what food is example, the increases in cereal productivity over the past 50
available and its nutritional quality, price, safety convenience and years have been mirrored in their declining price.214 Beyond
promotion. This in turn influences how available high-quality diets farm-gate prices, consistent and comparable data on trends in
are to the consumer and how affordable and appealing they are. food prices at point of retail are difficult to find, particularly for
low-income countries. Figure 6.11 shows an analysis of changes
The evidence on food systems impacts on availability appears in food prices between 1990 and 2009/12 for five high and upper-
broadly compatible with the evidence on diets. While modern middle-income countries: Brazil, China, Mexico, South Korea
food systems are providing opportunities to make foods and the UK. Despite the range of food systems represented by
associated with high-quality diets more available, they are these countries, the trends are very similar. Whenever there is a
also presenting barriers to greater growth; many changes have significant price change, the price of fruits and vegetables have
occurred which make it easier to deliver foods associated with gone up in all cases, while prices of the processed foods for which
low-quality diets more available. A critical question is the degree data are available have gone down in four out of six cases.
FIGURE 6.11: Estimated average annual price change from 1990 in five countries
■ Staples ■ Oil & sugar ■ Meat, poultry, fish ■ Fruit & vegetables ■ Processed foods
CH Grain
KR Dried rice
BR Rice
MX Tortilla and maize flour
KR Vegetable oil
BR Soya oil
MX Sugar
CH Meat, poultry & products
KR Fish
BR Beef
MX Chicken
UK Chicken
CH Vegetables
BR Tomato
BR Orange
KR Cabbage
MX Tomato
MX Fresh vegetables
UK Fresh green vegetables
CH Cakes, biscuits and bread
KR Ramen
BR Sweet biscuits
MX Chocolate and snacks
MX Ready meals
UK Ice cream tub/block
-3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Note: CH: China; KR: Republic of Korea; BR: Brazil; MX: Mexico; UK: United Kingdom
Source: Overseas Development Institute, Figure A, Wiggins and Keats (2015)
214
Alston and Pardey (2015)

It is not only the price level Box 6.1: Price volatility and diet quality
that matters for diet quality, International food prices have been more volatile after
the food prices spikes of 2007–08218 and analysts project
but the volatility of prices. that such volatility is likely to persist.219 The causes of this
increase are multiple, including the strengthening of links
between financial, energy and food markets generated
One recent global review215 on whether food prices are by globalization220 and the exacerbating effect of climate
a barrier to the adoption of higher-quality diets by lower- change.221 International food price volatility exerts
income groups concluded that energy-dense foods composed significant influence on domestic food price volatility,
of refined grains, added sugars and fats are cheaper per especially when the volume of trade in the commodity in
calorie than the recommended nutrient-dense foods and question is greater than 40% of its domestic production.222
that lower-quality diets were generally cheaper (based on
151 studies). Another recent review216 based on 27 studies Not all regions have seen an increase in food price
from 10 countries (all high-income except for Brazil and volatility since 2007 (e.g. sub-Saharan Africa). But they
South Africa) shows healthier meats are more expensive also experience high levels of food price volatility caused
than unhealthy meats. This category (meats) has the largest by domestic factors223 such as political turmoil,224 poor
healthy/non-healthy price differential, but there are significant infrastructure, weak price transmission, ineffective storage
cost differentials for healthy grains, oils and fats, and dairy facilities and government policy that does not take enough
produce. By contrast, there was no difference in the cost of account of – and even exacerbates – factors such as the
soda/juice by healthy/ non-healthy categories. Studies on seasonality of food prices.225
the affordability of nutritionally adequate diets in low- and
middle-income countries are lacking. Finally, it is not only the The poorest in low- and middle-income countries are the
price level that matters for diet quality, but the volatility of least able to manage food price volatility. They typically
prices,217 as explained in Box 6.1. spend the over half of their incomes on food226 and so
volatility in food affordability is also affected by income
We have only considered the role of a relatively small number volatility. Food intake and hence the diversity of diets of
of elements in food supply systems that have implications the poorest are most sensitive to changes in prices227 and
for diet quality. The evidence we show is only indicative. incomes, especially during crises.228 They are most strongly
Considerably more investment in research is needed to better felt for those dependent on market purchases – the urban
understand how exactly food supply system elements are poor and the rural net buyers of food.229 The cost of a
linked with concrete diet quality outcomes. Nevertheless, least-cost nutritionally adequate diet has been shown to
in line with the data presented in Chapter 2, the evidence increase and fluctuate more dramatically during times
indicates that recent trends in food supply systems are of international food price volatility in many countries,
associated with both positive and negative trends for diets including Ethiopia, Myanmar, Niger, Tanzania and Uganda.230
and that there are multiple entry points for both improving
and decreasing diet quality. On the basis of available Previous research shows that women tend to act as shock
predictions, there is no evidence to suggest that future trends absorbers when it comes to price fluctuations231 even
for low- and middle-income countries will be any different to though they are most vulnerable to diet shortfalls. Impacts
what has occurred in high-income countries, reflecting the on infants and young children will be locked in for their
broader global trend in food system change. But informed lifetimes and so the impacts of food price volatility on
and innovative policies can change food systems in a positive diet and nutrition are long-lived.232 While the impacts
direction towards healthier future diets. These policy on diet-related NCDs of food price volatility have received
opportunities are explored in the next chapter. little research attention, some analysts suggest a strong
connection via the liberalization of foreign direct
investment and the stronger connections of financial
and food markets.233
215
Darmon and Drewnowski (2015) 216Rao et al. (2013) 217Global Panel (2016a) 218Von Braun and Tadesse (2012) 219Global Panel (2016a)
220
Chavas, Hummels and Wright (2014) 221Wheeler and Von Braun (2013) 222Ceballos et al. (2016) 223Minot (2014) 224Pinstrup-Andersen (2015)
225
Cornia, Deotti and Sassi (2016) 226Von Braun and Tadesse (2012) 227Green et al. (2013) 228Skoufias, Tiwari and Zaman (2011)
229
Von Braun and Tadesse (2012) 230Global Panel (2016a) 231Haddad et al. (1995) 232Hoddinott et al. (2008) 233Friel, Labonte and Sanders (2013); Hossain et al. (2015)
Policies and tools for diet-
friendly food systems
• The food system presents a huge opportunity to act to improve

diets. There are many possible actions that can be taken to improve
diet quality with entry points in different parts of the food system.
Most of these are vastly underutilized.
• Some solutions have already been tried to improve diet quality

in food supply systems, but typically not widely enough. There
is significant scope to improve design so they are more effective
in specific contexts.
• Many policies that influence the food system have objectives other
than improving diet quality, such as increasing the quantity of food
supply and profitability. There is considerable scope to amplify
their effects by building in diet quality objectives.
• Policies need to align the whole food system towards diet quality
goals. A policy to produce more vegetables, for example, will be
KEY MESSAGES
rendered ineffective if they are all lost or wasted before they reach
consumers. Food can also be rendered unsafe through entry points
in the food system.
• Policies to create diet-friendly food systems should be selected

to address the diet quality and malnutrition problems in
populations in individual countries, municipalities or localities.
Policy design should also take account of the reality of people’s
lives and cultural concerns.
• Given the plethora of possible actions, how can policy makers

decide which will be effective to meet local diet quality problems?
A simple decision-making tool is provided to help policy makers
identify which actions will help lever food systems towards diet
quality goals.
7 Policies and tools for diet-friendly food systems
In this chapter we ask: What actions can be taken in food systems
to maximize the positive trends towards diet quality observed Actions are also needed
in Chapter 3 and minimize negative trends? This means actions
that improve food environments by making more diverse diets
to minimize the availability,
available and affordable to vulnerable groups. They involve making
wholegrains, legumes, fruits, vegetables and nuts affordable and
affordability and appeal of foods
appealing to all, and providing meat, fish and dairy in ways that high in saturated and trans fats,
contribute to improving diet quality. Actions are also needed to
minimize the availability, affordability and appeal of foods high salts, sugars and/or other refined
in saturated and trans fats, salts, sugars and/or other refined
carbohydrates, as well as excessive consumption of meat. To do so: carbohydrates, as well as excessive
• Changes will be needed throughout the different food consumption of meat.
supply systems and food environments. This means looking
for actions throughout food systems and aligning them towards
a common objective. They include policies, investments, • Action needs to be tailored to address the diet quality
programmes and projects. In particular, as the private sector problem, including new and emerging problems, at hand.
plays a key role in food systems, incentives and standards for While there are common drivers and processes, the nature
businesses should be an important consideration. Every action of diet quality problems vary spatially and demographically
will have a specific food system entry point. between different populations, as does the nature of food
systems that serve these populations. While some problems
• Actions are needed at different scales. Leveraging short may be endemic throughout national populations and caused
chains and local food systems will be effective in some by nationwide food system elements, in other cases solutions
instances; in others influencing longer chains will be needed. will be local.
In practice, a combination will be necessary. Action can also
be taken at different levels of government. While national • The starting point should be an understanding of the
governments play a key role in policy formulation, actions can diet quality problem and the role food systems play in
also be taken at the municipal level. There is also a role for influencing it. Finding effective solutions will involve starting
global decision making. with the population of concern and the diet quality gap they
face, examining what food systems they are served by and then
working back into the food system to find the most effective,
There are many possible aligned solutions.
actions that can be taken to Here we illustrate a range of possible options that can be applied
improve diet quality with entry by policy makers. We introduce a simple but innovative decision-
making tool to assist the decision-making process of identifying
points in different parts of the food system actions. The aim is to help guide the decision-making
process for policy makers to follow to ensure that food systems
food system. are delivering high-quality diets.
98 Chapter 7: Policies and tools for diet-friendly food systems

7.1 Food systems policies for improving food environments and diet quality
In 2014, the Global Panel released its technical brief: How Can of actions, which can be used to improve diet quality via
Agriculture and Food System Policies Improve Nutrition?234 In improving food environments:
it, we stress that policies across the food system (i.e. not just
in agriculture) would be key to reducing undernutrition and • Improving delivery of actions already tried with the goal
growing overweight, obesity and other diet-related NCDs. No of improving diet quality. Some policy actions have already
single policy on its own can improve diet quality and nutrition. been taken as a means of improving diet quality. The evidence
Rather, the greatest and the most rapid improvement in diet for their effectiveness is variable, but they provide experiences
quality will come from coordinated efforts in several different from which to build on and learn from. There are opportunities
policy domains. For instance, a consumer-facing policy that to improve their design and/or delivery, as well as implement
promotes nutritious foods will be more successful if an more widely used lessons on what has worked well. For
agricultural policy has improved production of those foods example, school meal programmes are implemented in many
and a market policy has improved access, making them more countries, but there is space for wider implementation and
available and affordable in the consumer’s food environment. more effective design and delivery to meet diet quality goals
and other food system benefits.235
This in turn requires planning and cooperation across
traditionally isolated parts of government and between public • Levering existing food systems policies towards diet quality.
and private sectors. To add to this political challenge, much There is already a plethora of policies implemented in food
improvement will come from changing existing policies, systems, from farm to fork. These policies have a range of
which are not contributing to improving diets and to resolving different objectives, including increasing food production,
incoherence between food-related policies in different parts supporting livelihoods and enhancing economic profitability.
of the food system. Most do not aim to improve diet quality, but could be modified
to do so. A typical example concerns policies that are directed
In the following sections, we illustrate some actions for policy at food production and security (i.e. having sufficient food) but
makers to consider for each of the parts of the food system. not towards diet quality.
We do this to illustrate the range of possibilities, but we must
stress that the most effective approach to improving diet quality • Novel policy actions. The third category is innovative policy
will be to implement a range of coordinated policy changes, actions that are completely novel and untested in the context
not single actions. These policy actions will not be applicable of food systems and diet quality. Examples are: using mobile
in all circumstances and are far from exhaustive. For each part technology operators to host nutrition messaging as a free
of the food system, we suggest that there are three broad sets service to farmers in households at risk of malnutrition;236
Box 7.1 The Global Panel’s ‘top 10’ recommendations
In its efforts to catalyze policy action, the Global Panel has 4. Improve infrastructure in agriculture and market systems
compiled a suite of technical and policy briefs that lay out the to increase year-round availability of nutrient-dense foods
evidence for recommendations. The 10 key recommendations to all consumers
that offer multiple win opportunities, from agricultural 5. Develop national policy and regulatory framework for food
production, to markets and trade systems, food transformation safety and quality
and consumer purchasing power to consumer demand are 6. Improve the nutritional quality of and consumer choice
listed below. regarding processed foods
7. Integrate nutrition education into all available national
1. Invest in nutrition-enhancing agricultural productivity services reaching consumers
growth, markets and trade systems 8. Expand agriculture-supportive targeted social protection
2. Increase research to ensure a greater presence of healthy programmes
foods in markets globally, including through public-private 9. Expand agriculture-supportive school meal programmes
partnerships 10. Improve the quality and specificity of metrics and data
3. Facilitate markets and trade in ways that moderate food needed to support evidence-based policy actions
price volatility
Source: Global Panel (2016c)
Global Panel (2014)

234 235
Global Panel (2015c) 236
Swanson (2008); Du (2014)
requiring sales reduction targets for companies for specific foods; to use the wider development literature as a basis on which to
or developing new retail hubs for specific nutritious foods at speculate about what could be adapted, developed and tested
locations and times suitable for underserved populations. in the food systems policy area (Table 7.1). We also make a
few “blue skies” suggestions in Tables 7.1 to 7.7 as a way of
To identify these actions, we reviewed information collated by encouraging innovative thinking.
the Global Panel, WHO, FAO, NGOs, donors and governments
on actions that are currently being taken. We then identified Throughout our illustrations of possible actions that can be
existing food systems policies with non-diet quality objectives taken by policy makers, we pay particular attention to policy
from the evidence gathered in Chapter 6 and FAO FAPDA (Food recommendations already made by the Global Panel. Box 7.1 lists
and Agriculture Policy Decision Analysis) database. We go on some of the key existing recommendations relevant to diet quality.
7.2 Entry points for policies and actions
7.2.1 Entry points in the agricultural subsystem “invest broadly in improving human capital, sustain and increase
the livelihood assets of the poor and focus on gender equality.”242
Improving delivery of actions that already have diet
quality goals The most recent reviews of the evidence found that projects
deliberately established to improve diet quality through
While households buy a majority of their foods from local markets agricultural production (e.g. home gardens) report increased
in most countries, many households vulnerable to malnutrition consumption of the produced foods rich in protein and
still produce and consume some of their own food. Deliberate micronutrients,243 and significantly improved diet patterns and
efforts to improve the nutritional quality of that food are proving vitamin-A intake for both women and children.244
an important way of improving diet quality (e.g. Burkina Faso).240
Actions that have been tried to date include urban agriculture, The emphasis of these projects has been in rural areas. Agriculture
improving household production of nutritious crops, empowering is also practiced in cities and urban fringes by millions of
women’s control of agricultural production and biofortification. households (Box 7.2). There are many positive implications of this
Early work to leverage agricultural production to improve nutrition urban agriculture for diet quality although a recent systematic
outcomes241 found that agricultural improvement generally review on its effects on food security, dietary diversity and
improved diet quantity but not nutritional status. Later work found nutritional status could not find a clear link, mainly because the
that agriculture for nutrition projects are most effective when they: constituent studies were poorly designed.245
TABLE 7.1: Policy options in the agricultural subsystem

Improving delivery • Urban agriculture.
of actions already • Home gardens or household production of nutritious foods e.g. milk, vegetables, legumes, underutilized grains in
tried with the goal producer households.237
of improving diet • Empowering women’s access to agricultural production.238
quality • Building diet behavioural change into small-scale agricultural programmes.
• Breeding staple crops that have higher densities of key micronutrients such as zinc, iron and vitamin A, i.e. biofortification.
Levering existing • Redesign the agricultural research landscape to support high diet quality,239 by reframing productivity through nutrients
food systems rather than through calories.
policies towards • Balance specialization and diversification of agricultural production at the landscape level to support high-quality diets,
diet quality such as crop diversification using locally adaptive varieties and adopting agroecology to develop local food systems.
Ideas for novel • Mobile network operators host nutrition messaging as a free service to farmers to drive more business to their services,
actions acknowledging that female farmers often control food acquisition and preparation.
• Introduce nutrient productivity metrics that assess kg of nutrient produced per unit of land or labour.
237
Global Panel (2014) 238Global Panel (2014) 239Global Panel (2014) 240Olney et al. (2015) 241See for example the collection of country case studies in Von Braun
and Kennedy (1994) 242The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and The World Bank (2007) 243Masset et al. (2012)
244
Girard et al. (2012) 245Warren, Hawkesworth and Knai (2015)

While these various projects are playing an important role
in levering the agricultural sector towards better nutrition Box 7.2: Urban farming: The potential positives
outcomes, they are limited. For example: for diet quality
• their primary focus to date has been on farm households or
short chains that directly link agricultural production to local • Vegetables have a short production cycle; some can
markets and on relatively small-scale projects developed in be harvested within 60 days of planting, so are suitable
isolation from broader, powerful food system forces for urban farming.
• the evidence of their effects is mixed, indicating a need
to focus carefully on appropriate design for local contexts and • Garden plots can be up to 15 times more productive
to enhance programme participation than rural holdings. An area of just 1 m2 can provide
• where they have been successful, the projects have involved 20 kg of food a year.
more than improving agricultural production alone
• they have not focused on reducing harmful components • Urban vegetable growers spend less on transport,
of diets. packaging and storage and can sell directly through
street food stands and market stalls. More income goes
There is thus considerable opportunity to improve and expand to them instead of to middlemen.
on delivery of these existing actions in the agricultural subsystems,
including by scaling-up, implementing synergistic changes to • Urban agriculture provides employment and incomes
ensure agricultural products reach markets and vulnerable for poor women and other disadvantaged groups.
groups and complementing them with additional and novel Source: FAO (2016e)
food system policies. Biofortification is one approach with huge
potential for scale-up. To further advance the potential benefits
of biofortification, experience has shown that greater efforts to
enhance programme participation will ensure effectiveness.246 ask what type of agricultural research would help meet
diet quality goals. It is possible, for example, that a greater focus
Levering existing food systems policies towards diet quality of research on postharvest losses would be more beneficial
The analysis of food systems change in Chapter 6 highlights the than productivity research.
potential entry points for attention by policy makers. Two of
these are: investment in agricultural R&D and getting the balance Another entry point that requires attention is the balance
right between specialization and diversification. between production specialization and diversification. Economic
theory tells us that agricultural specialization and trade, guided
Promoting better nutritional quality is rarely the principal driver by a country’s comparative advantage is the logical response
of either private or public sector R&D. With the exception of in a rational, frictionless, shock-free world in which there is
biofortification, public research is mainly guided by the goal perfect information. However, in the real world, agricultural
of ensuring a reliable supply of basic staples, generating more strategies need to balance specialization with diversification of
calories and thereby meeting at least a minimum threshold of cropping systems to ensure a balanced diet, addressing risk and
energy demand. As noted earlier, public sector research has also uncertainty, build resilience and generate greater environmental
led to legumes research which to date has not attracted major sustainability. The Panel has already highlighted how emerging
private sector R&D. Private sector investment in research is policy actions for climate-smart agriculture could contribute
driven by a range of different incentives, including profitability. to improving diet quality through crop diversification:
How can the agricultural research landscape be geared more
effectively towards supporting high diet quality? “Crop diversification using locally adapted varieties is widely
promoted as a strategy that can support the adaptive
One approach would to be to allocate funding to “productivity” capacity of most food systems. For example, the Adaptation
of nutrients rather than to calories. Box 7.3 highlights the for Smallholder Agriculture Programme in Bolivia, has used
modelled impact of moving agricultural productivity towards indigenous knowledge related to climate change adaptation
diet quality using two sets of scenarios run using IMPACT to support the introduction of varieties that can be grown at
Version 3.2.2.247 However, we know that productivity alone will higher altitudes if necessary. That intervention has supported
not necessarily have a direct impact on the diets of vulnerable a transition from almost exclusive potato production to a more
groups. Questions need to be asked that reflect more broadly diversified portfolio that includes fruits tree production, which
on the current focus of agricultural research on productivity and has increased market penetration for smallholders.”248
De Brauw, Eozenou and Moursi (2015); Global Panel (2015b) 247Robinson et al. (2015). The scenarios were run to 2050, using the second shared socio-economic
246
pathway (SSP2, O’Neill et al. 2014) and assuming a constant 2005 climate. 248Global Panel (2015a)
Box 7.3: Modelling the impact of increasing agricultural productivity of healthier foods
Under each of the productivity scenarios (Table 7.2), productivity of about 25% and price declines for targeted
agricultural productivity for healthier foods (e.g. fruits, commodities was in the range of 20–25% relative to the
vegetables, pulses and poultry) is increased compared to reference case in 2050. The average change in world prices for
the reference scenario, which assumes continuation of all fruits and vegetables, pulses and poultry is 22%, 22% and
current trends. Increased productivity of these crops leads 24%, respectively. The Prod50 scenario which doubles the
to greater production and a decline in world prices for increase in productivity growth shows a near doubling in the
these commodities. The Prod25 scenario sees an increase in decline in prices compared to Prod25.
Table 7.2: Policy scenarios: Productivity

Scenario Description
Reference Baseline IMPACT Productivity Trends
25% higher yields compared to reference scenario by 2050 for fruits, vegetables, pulses and poultry,
Prod25
phased in over 35 years in all regions starting in 2015
50% higher yields compared to reference scenario by 2050 for fruits, vegetables, pulses and poultry,
Prod50
phased in over 35 years in all regions starting in 2015
Source: IMPACT Model 3.2.2 run Feb 2016
Declining prices benefit consumers, allowing them to purchase 16% under the Prod50 scenario (Figure 7.1). As all fruits,
more with the same income than previously. Under both vegetables and pulses benefited from increased productivity
productivity scenarios, total demand for all foods increases from in both scenarios, there are limited changes in the make-up of
1% to 2%. These increases in demand are more pronounced for food demand within these commodities groups (and limited
targeted commodities, which see global increases of between differences across regions); hence all of the commodities in
3% and 7% under the Prod25 scenario and between 5% and these two groups see increases in demand.
FIGURE 7.1: Changes in food demand in calories for select food groups (f&v, pulses, meat) by 2050
■ Prod25 ■ Prod50
15
(% change from reference)
12
0
F&V Pulses Meat Total F&V Pulses Meat Total F&V Pulses Meat Total
Food Food Food
WLD DVG DVD
Source: IMPACT Model 3.2.2 run Feb 2016 Note: WLD – world; DVG – developing countries; DVD – developed countries
Poultry is the only animal product targeted by the modelling expensive. Meat demand for beef, lamb and pork declines by
scenarios. It sees a significant decline in prices relative to about 0.5% and between 1–1.6% for the Prod25 and Prod50
other meat commodities. This leads not only to an increase in scenarios, respectively. This has the additional benefit not only
demand for poultry (of 7% and 16% for Prod25 and Prod50, of increasing demand for poultry, a relatively healthy animal
respectively), but also to substitution effects in relation to protein source, but also of reducing red meat demand, which
other meat commodities, which become relatively more is associated with a variety of negative health outcomes.
Source: Robinson et al. (2015)

The growing support for agroecology, defined as: Levering existing food systems policies towards diet quality
Many policies that influence food storage, transport and trade
“the science of applying ecological concepts and principles have considerable potential to be redesigned through a diet-
to the design and management of sustainable food systems” quality lens. In food storage and transport, many efforts to
reduce postharvest losses still focus on cereals.253 Yet training,
– is another way through which greater diversity can be capacity building and technologies to reduce waste could play a
generated.249 It is characterized by temporal diversification key role in enhancing the availability and affordability of a greater
(e.g. crop rotation), spatial diversification (e.g. mixed farming) diversity of crops where spoilage levels are relatively high, such
and encourages diversity at the plot, farm and landscape level. as fruits, vegetables and legumes. Simple measures like the use
Agroecological approaches can be developed as part of a of returnable plastic crates have been proposed as effective.254
broader agricultural strategy that aims to balance the benefits Waste reduction also aligns well with the need to reduce use of
of specialization and diversity. But as yet, these have rarely scarce natural resources and cut greenhouse gas emissions.255
been designed with diet quality as one of the primary intended Policies on transport of food could also focus on transport
outcomes. Simply increasing production diversity will not infrastructure to ensure poorly served communities have access
necessarily have a direct impact on diet quality; markets are also to better quality diets and cool chain technologies where they
needed for agroecology. present bottlenecks for availability and access.256
Along with agroecology, there is a whole range of production Actions can also be taken to improve food safety. The Global
techniques that could be used to increase the contribution of Panel has highlighted the urgent need to:
agricultural production to high diet quality while also meeting
sustainability goals.250 Actions are needed to address food safety “Promote improved knowledge and practices related to on-farm
concerns and food waste. Staggering production cycles can, for storage of agricultural products known to be prone to food
example, be used to reduce surplus and even-out production safety hazards. Numerous innovations in materials, for example,
during the year. in storage bin and sack technology, should be explored and
promoted in the relevant context.”257
7.2.2 Entry points in the food storage, transport
and trade subsystem For example, it is evident that during storage, better drying and
storage facilities are needed to prevent and control aflatoxin
Improving delivery of actions already tried with the goal contamination of maize and groundnuts.
of improving diet quality
Existing food and agricultural trade policies vary widely between
The food systems analysis in Chapter 6 identified three key entry countries. In some countries, governments allocate major roles to
points in the storage, transport and trade subsystem, which public institutions to manage markets, such as through strategic
covers food as it moves through the system postharvest: reducing infrastructure investments, the setting of commodity prices,
food losses and waste, addressing food safety, and rules and managing publicly-held buffer stocks, distributing commodities
mechanisms on cross-border trade. While there are numerous to targeted populations and levying import tariffs on foods.
efforts underway globally and nationally to reduce food losses In contrast, trade policies in other countries focus largely on
and improve food safety in the postharvest system, none were providing a legal and regulatory framework with which private
identified which explicitly aim to improve diet quality. marketing agents must comply, such as those linked to food
safety and labelling of food quality.258 In all cases, diet quality has
Only a small number were identified for trade policy. Pacific not been seen as a primary outcome and food security has played
Island countries, which rely heavily on imports, have imposed a more central role. Despite the tensions around trade policy at
restrictions and tariffs on imports on foods high in fats, sugars the international scale, considerations of diet quality should be
and salt. There is an often-cited example of the Pacific Island of brought into these negotiations and opportunities taken to build
Samoa, which restricted imports of fatty meats in an attempt to capacity for this process.259 Good diagnosis is needed to ensure
reduce their consumption. Following accession to the WTO, this coherence between trade policies and diet and complementary
was changed to a high sales tax.251 Another isolated example is policies implemented to enhance the synergies and manage the
an action by the Government of Ghana to use their food trading risks of trade policy for diet quality.260 A critical question is what
standards to limit the amount of fat in meat and meat cuts. While complementary policies are needed as part of the package of
these standards apply both to domestic and imported meat, they trade reforms to ensure that the benefits of trade policies are
were developed in response to rising imports of low quality.252 The transferred to the people who most need them and to mitigate
standards limit the amount of fat in specific meat cuts. the risks?
Gliessman (2007) 250Gladek et al. (2016) 251Thow et al. (2014) 252Thow et al. (2014) 253Affognon et al. (2015) 254Kitinoja (2013)
249
Global Panel(2015a) 256Global Panel (2016b) 257Global Panel (2015b) 258Global Panel (2016a) 259UNSCN (2015) 260UNSCN (2015)
255
A range of actions could be taken to make trade policy more foods (biofortification) is one pathway towards improving the
coherent with diet quality outcomes. Regional trade of nutritious micronutrient intake of these groups.
foods is perhaps an underutilized space to fill diet gaps.261
The what, who and how of fortification is very context-specific.
Existing trade mechanisms could be used, such as redefining Working through small-, medium- and large-scale industry
sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS Agreement) to to fortify wheat, rice, sweet potatoes, salt and sugar with
incorporate diet considerations, leveraging aid for trade initiatives elements such as zinc, iodine, vitamin A and iron, fortification
to support domestic production of nutritious foods and using the can be an effective intervention for key vulnerable groups
Codex Alimentarius Commission (Food Code) for international (e.g. those on low incomes with a monotonous diet, those
guidelines. For example, the World Trade Organization (WTO) with illness, those with particularly high nutrient requirements,
Aid-for-Trade initiative or Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF) pregnant and lactating women and young children).262 The
Aid-for-Trade partnership could be used to increase the supply of public sector needs to set the nutrition priorities and the
fruits and vegetables in low-income countries and diet goals could nutrient thresholds and monitor the safety and compliance
be taken into account in the design of Diagnostic Trade Integration of fortification with standards.
Studies in low-income countries. Codex could be used to set
international standards for consumer-friendly nutrition labelling Fortification should not be thought of as a substitute for
and ensure SPS standards support diet quality considerations. a well-balanced and diverse diet, but rather as a complement.
The need for fortification should decline as diet diversity
7.2.3 Entry points in the food transformation increases, as education levels improve and as families move
subsystem from belonging to low- to middle-income households. There
will still be vulnerable groups with particularly high nutrient
Improving delivery of actions already tried with the goal requirements that will at certain times require the consumption
of improving diet quality of fortified foods. The Global Panel has already recommended
Two of the entry points in the food transformation subsystem that for effective fortification, public–private partnerships are
have been relatively widely implemented to explicitly improve needed to set appropriate standards, establish monitoring
diet quality: fortification and reformulation. Both these mechanisms, and investigate new ways to process and package
approaches are examples of using public policy to leverage private nutrient-dense but affordable, complementary infant food.263
sector action to improve the nutritional quality of their products.
Another entry point that has been relatively widely tried is
Many populations and age groups do not get enough of the reformulation of processed foods i.e. the process by which food
recommended nutrients they need through the food they eat. manufacturing companies remove, reduce and/or substitute
This may be because they lack the income to buy a diverse diet, one ingredient for another in a processed food. Reformulating to
they lack the knowledge about the value of a diverse diet or it is reduce salt content has now become one of the most widespread
too inconvenient to access such a diet. The fortification of certain public policies to promote higher-quality diets.
TABLE 7.3: Policy options in the food storage, transport and trade subsystem
Improving delivery • Using tariff levels (within bounded limits) to influence imports of different foods in small island states dominated by imports.
of actions already •U se trading standards for food composition to improve nutrient quality of specific foods.
tried with the goal of
improving diet quality
Levering existing • Train, build capacity building and adopt technologies to reduce postharvest waste of nutritious crops.
food systems policies • Invest in techniques to reduce postharvest contamination.
towards diet quality • Investing in transport and cool chain infrastructure where they prevent blockage for availability and access to poorly
served communities.
• Safeguards to prevent distortions that discourage local production and regional trade in nutritious foods such as
legumes and underutilized grains.
• Integrating diet quality into trade negotiations around food security.
• Ensuring coherence between trade policies and diet quality, including through implementation of complementary policies.
• Leveraging Aid-for-Trade initiatives to support domestic production of nutritious foods.
• Redefine sanitary and phytosanitary standards (SPS Agreement) to incorporate diet considerations.
Ideas for novel actions • Develop innovative, community-based postharvest technologies to preserve surplus nutritious foods for sale in local
markets throughout the year.
• All food-trading partners are obliged to show how their trading practices will help to promote higher-quality diets
Hawkes, Grace and Thow (2015)

261
Bhutta et al. (2013)
262
Global Panel (2014)
263

At least 75 countries have developed salt reduction strategies,
60 or more involve engaging with industry to reformulate
TABLE 7.4: Policy options in the food
products.264 The process involves identifying the largest sources of transformation subsystem
salt in processed foodstuffs and gradually reducing salt levels over Improving delivery • Food product reformulation
time. Many such interventions have been shown to be successful of actions already • Labelling
in reducing salt intakes. While most initiatives are voluntary, the tried with the goal •R estrictions on advertising and other forms of
governments of Argentina and South Africa are now increasingly of improving diet promotional marketing
imposing mandatory salt limits. Legislative approaches have also quality • Health-related food taxes
been taken to reduce trans fats.265 These restrictions have been
Levering existing • New primary processing technologies
universally successful in reducing trans fats levels.266 food systems to reduce costs and enhance consumer
policies towards acceptability of nutritious foods.
But, for both salt and trans fats, there has been far less activity diet quality • Corporate tax rates banded to incentivize
in low- and lower-middle-income countries. For example, healthier food production and processing.
while there are 40 high-income and 21 upper-middle-income • Investment fund for start-up SMEs producing
countries reportedly pursuing such measures, only 11 lower- recommended foods.
middle-income countries and a single low-income country Ideas for novel • Investment conditionalities placed on food
have put a salt reduction strategy in place.267 Given the proven actions companies to meet sales reduction targets of
effectiveness of these strategies, improving delivery involves foods that undermine high diet quality.
wider implementation. Source: Compiled by the authors
Policy entry points are also available, which aim to change food
environments that need to be implemented by the actors in the “There are few data on how the private sector is influencing diets
food transformation subsystem. These include: health-related and diet quality through food processing, fortification, marketing
food taxes, nutrition labelling and restricting advertising and and pricing. Policy makers need a much better understanding of
marketing of processed foods to children. Changing affordability the growing role of commercial food transformation as it influences
though taxes is an approach that has proved effective in what the majority of the world’s citizens are already eating.”275
Mexico268 and is being more widely implemented – at least 11
countries have health-related food taxes. Box 7.4 illustrates the Levering existing food systems policies towards diet quality
effects of a health-related food tax using the IMPACT model.269 Chapter 5 shows that food processing originated with the
need to enhance the quantity of food available, to preserve it
Nutrition labelling is also relatively widely implemented and through seasons and to make it safe, but in more recent years,
aims to provide information to consumers, either by providing the focus has shifted towards producing foods more quickly
lists of nutrient content or more graphical approaches giving and profitably. How can this approach be oriented towards
“traffic light” colours for the levels of different nutrients. The diet quality? One option is to improve the basic processing of
evidence suggests the main influence on diet quality is through recommended foods. Legumes are a good example. Improved
encouraging reformulation.270 Another approach is through technologies to reduce milling losses and enhance product
restricting marketing of (often ultra-processed) foods high in fats quality together with the development of fast-cooking bean
sugars and salt to children, which has been, to date, implemented flours could act to enhance availability, affordability and appeal
in only a small number of countries. The aim is to reduce the to consumers.276
appeal of these foods to children, though potentially it could
also have impact by reducing the incentive for food Existing policies on industry investment often encourage inward
manufacturers to produce these products in the first place.271 foreign, as well as domestic, investment in food processing. A
way of reorienting this approach would be to provide incentives
To improve delivery of these actions, more need to be for “diet quality” investments and strategies to encourage an
implemented in low- and middle-income countries. To date these entrepreneurial economy for high-quality diets. Corporate tax
approaches been far more widely implemented in higher-income rates could for example be banded to incentivize healthier food
countries although it is the lower-income countries where growth production and processing. Or competition law could be used
rates of sales of ultra-processed foods are growing the fastest.272 to lower barriers to entry for food companies that meet certain
This is partly because of opposition to their implementation from conditions in terms of the health effects of their products.277
the private sector.273 They also need to be carefully designed and Investment funds for healthy start-ups and small-scale, local-level
their impact better evaluated.274 As already pointed out by the Panel, processing of nutritious foods could also be provided.
264
Trieu et al. (2015) 265WCRF (2016b) 266Downs et al. (2015); Hendry et al. (2015) 267Trieu et al. (2015) 268Colchero et al. (2015) 269The International Model for
Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT) was developed in the early 1990s to consider the long term challenges facing policy makers in reducing
hunger, and poverty in a sustainable fashion. It is a network of linked economic, water, and crop models. 270Hawkes et al. (2015) 271Hawkes et al. (2015) 272IFPRI
(2016a); WCRF (2016b) 273Roberto et al. (2015) 274Hawkes et al. (2015) 275Global Panel (2015d) 276Mazur et al. (2012) 277De Schutter (2010)
Box 7.4: Modelling the effect of health-related food taxes on diet quality
The tax scenarios differ from the productivity scenarios in that intervention lead to a decline in demand. Table 7.5 outlines
they suppress demand, by increasing the domestic price that the two policy scenarios we model and Figure 7.2 summarizes
consumers face on oils and sugar. The global effects of this the outcomes of the scenarios.
TABLE 7.5: Policy scenarios: Taxes

Scenario Household food taxes
Decline in baseline consumer support estimates (CSEs) by 20 percentage points implemented in 2015 in all regions for
Tax 1
palm fruits oil, palm kernel oil and sugar
Tax 2 Decline in baseline CSEs by 20 percentage points implemented in 2015 in all regions for all food oils and sugar
Source: IMPACT Model 3.2.2 run Feb 2016
Globally, the demand for sugar declines by about 6% under oil consumption is diminished only slightly) while health can
Tax 1 and Tax 2. The demand for all food oils is diminished, but be improved as consumers switch from palm oil to healthier
more for Tax 2 (all oils) than for Tax 1 (only palm oil). Tax 1 forms of vegetable oils.
shows how overall food security can be protected (vegetable
FIGURE 7.2: Changes in food demand in calories for select food groups (food oils, sugar) by 2050
WLD DVG DVD

Food Sugar Total Food Sugar Total Food Sugar Total
0 oils food oils food oils food
(% change from reference)
-3
-6
-9
-12
-15
■ Tax1 ■ Tax 2
Source: IMPACT Model 3.2.2 run Feb 2016 Note: WLD – world; DVG – developing countries; DVD – developed countries
Source: Robinson (2015)
7.2.4 Policies with primary entry point in food restructuring of supply chains and are often developed to
retail and provisioning subsystem improve access to more nutritious foods.278
Improving delivery of actions already tried with the Another set of actions involves providing incentives to retailers
goal of improving diet quality to make better quality diets available and reduce the appeal of
There are a large number of potentially powerful entry points in lower-quality diets, an approach that has been tried in high-
the food retail and provisioning subsystem, most of them vastly income countries. For example:
underused (Table 7.7).
• In the United States, in February 2014, the US Congress formally
There is a rapidly growing interest in short-chain “local food established the Healthy Food Financing Initiative (HFFI) in
systems” involving direct marketing from farmers to customers. which states use funds to incentivize retailers to sell nutritious
These systems involve new models of retailing as well as the foods in underserved areas.279
278
IPES-Food (2015) WCRF (2016a)
279

• In Singapore, the “Healthier Dining Programme” launched will also involve greater consideration of diet quality goals. For
in June 2014, offers food operators who offer lower calorie example, historically, the development of public procurement
meals and use healthier ingredients such as oils with reduced programmes in low- and middle-income countries has been
saturated fat content and/or wholegrains, a certification to focused on the provision of adequate calories. In high-income
attract consumers. countries and some low- and middle-income countries, efforts
have been underway for some years to refocus on diet quality.
Retailers are also in a powerful position to make changes in the Yet many low- and middle-income countries do not yet use food
way they sell, position and promote food. For example, in the US, and nutrient-based standards to guide their food procurement.
a range of experiments have been tried which change the “choice Consumer engagement will be needed to ensure that the changes
architecture” within retailers, so making foods high in fat, sugar meet their needs.
and salt less appealing.280
Levering existing food systems policies towards diet quality
In food provisioning, an action that has been tried and tested Another entry point is through informal and traditional markets
is public procurement into settings such as schools, hospitals and street vendors, which are a source of food for many vulnerable
and prisons. The most notable example is “home-grown school groups, including foods such as fruits, vegetables and ASF.283 Yet
feeding”. These approaches, where food served in schools is policy in low- and middle-income countries to date on these
procured from local and/or family farmers can have multiple retailers has rarely been focused on diet quality. Investment to
food system benefits by establishing stable markets for producers ensure the competitiveness of this sector to help make nutritious
while serving more recommended diets to children.281 foods accessible and affordable to local populations could
strengthen them in the face of competition from supermarkets.
The food service environment is another critical entry point. For
example, cities in Brazil, such as Belo Horizonte and Curitiba, Food safety policies in the informal sector are a related
have established what are known as “popular restaurants” which opportunity. Most existing policies are directed towards
provide meals for all local citizens at affordable prices.282 formal market structures, such as growing supermarkets. This
large, heterogeneous, informal food sector with millions of
Food at work is another entry point. The private sector also disorganized, largely untrained and unmonitored factors, makes
has an important role to play here by providing nutritious it difficult to assure food safety. The ability to identify unsafe food
meals in workplaces through “food at work” programmes and or inflict market or legal penalties on those who sell it is relatively
the provision of regular meals. Developing “home-grown work low. Direct efforts to enforce food safety standards could result
feeding” would be a novel way to build in what has been learned in both a loss of nutritious food sources and a loss of livelihoods
from public procurement for food in schools. for the poor. There is also evidence that, if properly supported,
informal markets can provide food that is at least as safe as that
The considerable potential for the food retail provisioning from supermarkets.284 In these contexts, participatory approaches
subsystem for diet quality appears very underutilized. Improving that engage informal food traders and vendors directly, offer
the delivery of these actions involves wider implementation. It some potential.285
TABLE 7.6: Policy options in the food retail and provisioning subsystem
Improving delivery • Local food systems with direct farm-consumer marketing
of actions already • Food provision in the public sector (“public procurement”) e.g. home-grown school feeding, “popular restaurants”
tried with the goal of • Private procurement e.g. food provision in workplaces
improving diet quality • Incentivizing location of private sector retail selling nutritious foods in locations convenient to households
Levering existing • Investment in wet markets that make nutritious foods accessible and affordable
food systems policies • Reorienting food safety policies to support informal and wet markets
towards diet quality • Price incentives for street vendors to use healthier ingredients
• Planning regulations to support wet markets and informal retailers that provide perishable foods to low-income populations
Ideas for novel actions • Favourable agreements for small traders at wet markets in return for guaranteeing food safety
• Invest in sanitary local environments as a direct incentive to encourage informal traders and street vendors to sell
perishable, nutritious foods
• Developing new retail hubs for specific nutritious foods at locations and times suitable for underserved populations
Bucher et al. (2016) 281Global Panel (2015c)

280 282
Rocha and Lessa (2009) Gómez and Ricketts (2013); Roesel and Grace (2015)
283
Grace (2015) 285Global Panel (2016b)

284
7.3 Aligning actions for coherence across food systems
There is clearly a wide range of options available to create more others. Policies should aim to create alignment (coherence) within
diet-friendly food systems. We have illustrated a small number food systems and between food systems and diet objectives.
here. In order that they deliver diet quality to people, including
underserved households, they need to be implemented in an We show examples of how this could be done in the examples
aligned manner across the food system. Changing food systems in Table 7.7, which plots the range of different policies across the
for better diets is likely to fail if decisions make changes in only subsystems aligned to achieve specific dietary goals.
one subsystem that is then undermined by lack of alignment in
TABLE 7.7: Aligning actions across food supply subsystems to create healthier food environments for higher-quality diets
Diet goal Agricultural production Transformation Storage, transport and trade Retail and provisioning
Increase fruit Invest in mixed and integrated Develop micro-enterprises Leverage the World Trade Invest in “wet market”
and vegetable cropping systems to produce for local processing to Organization (WTO) Aid-for- infrastructure to enable
intake production diversity in areas reduce waste Trade initiative or Enhanced maintenance for low-
where markets are poorly Integrated Framework (EIF) income groups; increase
developed; where markets are Aid-for-Trade partnership to capacity for food safety
developed invest in fruits and invest in production (column among traders
vegetable production using 1) in low-income countries
global funding mechanisms
(see column 4)
Increase intake Agricultural research into new Develop fast-cooking bean Train farmers in management Food price subsidies
of legumes/ varieties to boost yield flours practices to reduce loss to for legumes where
pulses insect damage; safeguards consumption is low
to prevent distortions that
discourage local production
and regional trade in legumes
Increase intake Incentivize the production of Develop more efficient Ensure policies support Set standards and
of grains high underutilized grains threshing and milling open regional trade where marketing incentives for
in protein, technologies for neighbouring countries use of wholegrains in
micronutrients underutilized grains; produce underutilized grains processed food products
and fibre develop novel foods with
underutilized species
Encourage Improve availability of animal Train milk processors in Invest in infrastructure to Establish milk retail hubs
balanced health services and ensure food safety and quality ensure safe transport of milk are open for trading
consumption women have access to animals assurance from farm to retail at times and locations
of safe milk convenient for women;
provide meals containing
milk in workplaces where
women work
Replace trans Encourage cooperatives Prohibit public investment Lower tariffs on trans fat-free Create an incentive for
fats with between trans fat-free oil and disincentivize private oils relative to oils containing street vendors to use trans
unsaturated producers to lower prices investment in facilities trans fats fat-free oils through use of
fats producing hydrogenated oils a “healthier oil” sign
Reduce intake Horticulture producers donate Reformulation to reduce Codex Alimentarius Sugary drink taxes
of sugary fruits that do not meet quality sugar and salt content; Commission sets international
drinks standards for the production creating incentives for sugary guidelines for consumer-
of fruit juices, thus potentially drinks companies to meet friendly nutrition labels
lowering costs sales reduction targets of including sugar warnings on
sugary drinks and increase sugary drinks
sales of pure fruit juices

7.4 How do we decide what actions will be effective? A decision-making tool
How can policy makers decide what actions will be effective

FIGURE 7.3: Six steps to identify policy actions to to meet local diet quality problems? How can they be prioritized?
achieve healthy diets The range of possible policies set out above provides an idea
of a few of the broad spectrum of actions available. But not all
will be appropriate and effective for local contexts. What will be
STEP ONE: Set a clear diet quality objective appropriate and effective depends on the nature of the problem,
population and actors involved. They may also need to be
What is/are the diet quality gap/s that need accompanied by policies that address household characteristics.
to be addressed and who does it affect?
Here we provide a simple but innovative decision-making
tool to aid decision making (Figure 7.3). The tool is made up
of a simple six-question decision tree and includes two key
innovations. First, it focuses on diet quality as an outcome,
STEP TWO: Engage with communities to explore focusing on the “gap” between what people are eating and the
perceptions of causes of the diet gap
high-quality diets that reduce malnutrition and promote health.
This requires an understanding of the current quality of diet of a
What might be responsible for the diet gap from the
perspective of the consumer? Availability? Affordability? given population, to compare with appropriate and up-to-date
Appeal? Or factors outside the food system? food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs). This may be challenging
for governments that lack data on current food consumption
and/or established FBDGs. This is a critical issue we will come
back to in the recommendations section of this report.
The decision tool then uses these specific dietary gaps to

STEP THREE: Review the role of food systems
identify solutions that are effective and aligned to address
If and what elements of food systems are responsible them. The process involves working backwards through the
for the diet gaps from the local to the global level? food subsystems, taking the population and food systems
characteristics into account, to identify realistic actions that
could address the gaps.
In Box 7.5, three examples of using this decision tool are

given for policy actions in different contexts and at local and
STEP FOUR: Identify actions for food systems solutions
national levels; thereby, providing more detail on three of the
examples in Table 7.7.
What are available options in the food
system for addressing the diet gaps?
STEP FIVE: Align actions to create coherence
What further actions are needed to align

these options across the food system?
STEP SIX: Leverage actions for sustainability
How can these actions also be leveraged to

improve food systems sustainability?
Box 7.5: Illustrative examples of using the food systems tool to identify effective actions to improve diet quality
Local level (rural) in oil high in trans fats as a means of managing these risks.
In Step One, local diet data indicated that low-income In the agricultural subsystem, shortage of land means there
women in rural areas experience high levels of micronutrient is no opportunity for establishing local fruit and vegetable
deficiencies and have diets low in dairy and eggs compared supplies or household production, while imports of very
to higher-income women. Dairy is thus identified as the diet low-cost vegetable oils make purchasing large quantities of
gap. Step Two shows that low-income women are aware of oil very cheap. In Step Four, potential options in the food
the importance of consuming these foods for their health, retail subsystem include: capacity building in food safety
but cannot afford sufficient amounts. They no longer among street vendors and in wet markets for making fruits
produce the products themselves due to export-oriented and vegetables available and creating an incentive for street
employment outside the home; the informal stores that make vendors to use trans fat-free oils through a “healthier oil” sign.
these products available are not conveniently accessible to In Step Five, to align to create coherence in other subsystems,
women working long hours outside the home. In Step Three, given the critical role of oil imports, lower tariffs could be
a food systems assessment shows that lack of infrastructure placed on healthier oils relative to oils with trans fats while also
for distributional logistics and lack of capacity for assuring encouraging cooperatives between trans-fat free oil producers
a safe milk supply reduces incentives for informal retailers as a means of lowering prices. Policy makers could prohibit
selling affordable dairy to locate in places more convenient public investment and disincentivize private investment
to women. Women also face barriers in producing it because in facilities producing hydrogenated oils. Step Six involves
of lack of support services and cultural attitudes around identifying synergies for sustainability.
women’s access to milk-producing animals. The retail and
agriculture subsystem are thus identified as critical entry National
points. Options in Step Four for addressing these gaps In this country, data collated for Step One indicate obesity
include a food-at-work programme provided by the women’s is rising rapidly throughout the country in both urban and
employer; it has the capacity and yet provides no food on- rural areas. A diet assessment reveals that the sales of sugary
site, despite knowing that the women experience dietary drinks and sweet snacks have risen significantly in the past
inadequacy. Another option would be to establish retail hubs decade. Sugar intake in children and adults is significantly
selling milk at times and locations convenient for the women, above the 5–10% daily calorie intake as recommended by
whose limited free time is taken up largely by work. Given the WHO. Given that sugary drinks are the largest single
lack of employment is one of the local challenges, a further contributor of sugar intake in the country, the focus is on
option would be to support production of dairy products by reducing the intake of sugary drinks. As pure fruit juice
women e.g. by ensuring women’s access to animals and the consumption is very low, a related objective is to increase the
provision of animal health services, In Step Five, aligning the intake of pure fruit juice. A review of consumer attitudes in
whole supply system would involve ensuring capacity for safe Step Two shows that soft drinks are very popular as they are
milk throughout the supply chain. Step Six would involve more widely available than water, which is usually avoided as
identifying any synergies for sustainability. it is perceived as being unclean. Soft drinks are also perceived
as affordable relative to pure fruit juices as well as to drinks
Municipal level (urban slum) with non-caloric sweeteners. There is generally low awareness
In Step One, data indicate that nutritional status in that sugary drinks cause weight gain and tooth decay and
urban slums ranges includes both stunting and obesity. no indication on the labels of the drinks that they carry
Micronutrient deficiency is rife while obesity is high. A diet these risks. Step Three shows that large transnational brands
assessment reveals exceedingly low levels of fruit and vegetable have taken advantage of an open trade investment regime
intake and excessive consumption of trans fats from low- and placed significant investments in new bottling plants.
quality meat products from street food, often served with The main ingredients of sugary drinks, sugar, is produced
reused oil. The diet goal is thus to increase consumption of nationally and obtained by soft drinks manufacturers at low
fruits and vegetables and decrease the consumption of fats. cost. There is further downward pressure on prices due to an
In Step Two, it is evident that these populations are generally open trade regime for high-fructose corn syrup, an alternative
poor, have few, if any cooking facilities at home and experience caloric sweetener. Alternative non-caloric sweeteners are also
poor sanitation, leading to high rates of diarrhoea and risk of available but at higher cost. In addition to large transnational
foodborne disease. A food system assessment in Step Three brands, local “b-brands” are also available at lower cost. Step
shows that in the provisioning and retail subsystem, street Four reveals a whole range of options available through the
vendors are unwilling to sell fruits and vegetables due to food system. Changing the affordability of sugary drinks in
food safety risks from poor sanitation. Foods are deep-fried food environments at the point of retail and applying a sugary

drinks tax is one. In the trade subsystem, the international by creating incentives for sugary drinks companies to meet
food code which sets standards for international trade, sales reduction targets of sugary drinks and increase sales of
the Codex Alimentarius (the Food Code), could be used pure fruit juices. Aligning to create coherence in Step Five
to set standards of labelling for sugary drinks. In the food would involve creating disincentives for the use of sugar
transformation subsystem, there are opportunities to reduce throughout the supply chain. Step Six involves identifying
the sugar content of drinks as well as encouraging innovation synergies for sustainability.
7.5 Implications
The food systems policy space is complex but it can be to be asked about how to redesign these approaches to alter the
navigated with careful diagnosis and a framework for selecting incentives for food systems actors to produce better diets. There
actions appropriate to context. Not all the solutions will are also possibilities to develop completely novel, innovative
be in the food system but many will. There are many as yet approaches to improving diet quality. The tool we present
untapped opportunities. There are many examples of food can help prioritize and select the most effective approaches:
systems approaches that have already been tried to improve attention to good diagnosis is key. The policy scenarios illustrate
diet quality. However, several of these have not been sufficiently clearly that the gains could be very substantial.
widely implemented and careful design is needed for all of
them to be effective. More and better evaluation of these Governments need to look across food system objectives and
approaches is required to see the effects they have and how at broader goals and constraints related to the environment
they could be improved. and social equity if better nutrition for all is central to its policy
design. In particular, the need to build sustainability into a
Some of the more powerful levers are food system policies that country’s agricultural system, conserve limited water supplies and
have been implemented for decades with the aim of improving promote long-term management of soils, forests and biodiversity
quantity of output, as well as income and profit. Questions need should be a priority.
Credit: John Ferguson,
Oxfam
KEY MESSAGES A call to action
• The proportion of the world that is suffering from diet-related

malnutrition stands at just over one in three. If current trends
continue, it will move towards one in two.
• Currrent trends do not have to continue. They can be redirected

towards reduced malnutrition through better diets.
• This process will require focused, determined and sustained action

from policy makers working in a complex context.
• This report is intended to provide policy makers with a guide to

what they can do – and why they need to do it.
8 A call to action
8.1 Nutrition – a new global priority
Agriculture and food systems must deliver much more than food agricultural system, conserving limited water supplies and
– they need to fulfil their potential to underpin the health and promoting long-term management of soils, forests and
well-being of populations. At a fundamental level, consumers are biodiversity. In particular, careful consideration needs to be
making food choices that are not consistent with good nutrition, given to the relationships between diets that are high quality
health and well-being. And public policies or private sector from a nutritional perspective, and their potential impacts on the
actions are not adequately aligning food systems toward the goal environment. These are more complex than popularly assumed,
of improving nutrition. and are likely to differ considerably in different contexts.
Diet quality is the number one risk factor contributing to Effective evidence-based policy making should be supported
the world’s disease burden. So at a global level, stakeholders by use of appropriate analytical tools. Policy makers need to
need to prioritize the improvement of nutrition – and the work throughout the food system to effect diet change. The
consumption of the healthy diets that promote it. While methodology set out in Chapter 7, embodying a six stage process
the Sustainable Development Goals have put ending hunger, from setting diet quality objectives through to identifying and
achieving food security, improving nutrition and promoting aligning actions throughout food systems, provides a systematic
sustainable agriculture high on the global agenda, the absence approach that is recommended for use by policy makers.
of diet quality is a serious omission. However, the 2016–2025
UN Decade of Action on Nutrition provides many potential Non-business stakeholders need to work harder with business
opportunities to place the improvement of diet quality through stakeholders to find innovative solutions to providing food
food systems at the centre of global action. that is nutritious, safe and affordable, especially to those on
lower incomes. Ways in which the public and private sectors can
The international community needs to step up and accord collaborate to lower the costs of scaling-up low-cost institutional,
the goal of healthy diets to all, and extend the same level of technical or infrastructure innovations need to be found.
focus and commitment that it gave to addressing HIV/AIDS,
and smoking. This will require stakeholders from governments, In making these changes, stakeholders will need to change
civil society, the media, business and research to work together the way they think about food systems. They are not merely
to make improving dietary quality a sustained political priority. for feeding people but for nourishing them well – food systems
Strong campaigns and accountability mechanisms need to are in effect health production systems. This change in mindset is
be put in place to build commitment and ensure it leads to subtle but crucial.
implementation and impact.
Finally, this report has highlighted the fact that the long path
At the national level, governments and private sector actors that high-income countries have taken to manage rising obesity
need to work together to focus on aligning individual food rates has not succeeded. That same path is not an inevitable one
systems with the goal of attaining healthy diets and improved for low- and middle-income countries. There are alternatives,
nutritional outcomes. This will require, amongst other actions, provided the right choices are made now and throughout the
creating incentives for private sector actors throughout the food food system. The challenge for policy makers in low- and middle-
system so that they can make decisions more favourable to the income countries is to find more direct and less damaging dietary
adoption of higher-quality diets. If safe and nutritious food is pathways from where their diets are today, to where they need
not available, affordable or deemed desirable, then consumers and want to be. South Korea is a good example of a country
will not acquire it and their health and livelihoods will suffer as a that has gone from low- to middle- to high-income levels in the
consequence. past 30 years in a way that has supported the supply of relatively
accessible and affordable high-quality diets. It is no coincidence
It will be critical for governments to look across both that this country has implemented many food system policies
food system objectives and broader goals and constraints that aim to promote health.
including the need to build sustainability into the country’s
114 Chapter 8: A call to action

8.2 Specific priorities for action
While most actions to improve food systems and diets 6 Make policies which regulate product formulation,
will depend heavily on local contexts, the following are labelling, advertising, promotion and taxes a high
universally applicable: priority. These are needed to create disincentives for
companies to allocate resources to forms of processing that
1 F ocus food and agriculture policies on securing diet undermine diet quality. Policies to educate consumers of the
quality for infants and young children. These are woefully adverse health effects of consuming these products more
inadequate in many countries. Improved policy choices are than occasionally are also needed.
needed which recognize the centrality of high-quality diets
for the youngest. 7 Improve accountability at all levels. Governments
committed to reshaping food systems toward healthy diets
2 Improve adolescent girl and adult women’s diet quality as need to set targets and publish transparent scorecards of
a priority in all policy making that shapes food systems. their results. Private sector actors should acknowledge their
Women are particularly vulnerable to the health impacts of far-reaching roles in defining food environments – and the
low-quality diets because of their higher nutrition requirements nutritional quality of foods and other products that they
and because of their disempowerment in some cultures. promote to consumers. Civil society organizations need to
monitor the performance of others.
3 Ensure that food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) guide
policy decisions to reshape food systems. FBDGs are largely 8 Break down barriers associated with the longstanding
absent in low-income countries (present only in 2 out of 31) division of jurisdictional responsibilities within many
and limited in lower-middle-income countries (12 out of 51). governments – between agriculture, health, social
They are needed to inform and to influence food policies protection and commerce. These can fundamentally
around the world. impede integrated action across food systems, inhibit the
effective allocation of resources and create barriers that
4
Animal source foods (e.g. dairy, eggs, fish and meat) inhibit access to data.
provide important nutrients. Policy support for these
foods should be pragmatically evidence-based rather 9 Institutionalize high-quality diets through public
than driven by ideology. Infants, children, adolescents and sector purchasing power. Food provided in schools,
women of reproductive age living in low-income contexts will hospitals, across the armed forces and in the prison
find it extremely hard to meet nutrient requirements in the system should be of the highest dietary benefit to the
absence of these foods. At the same time some groups in low- consumer. This approach has the potential to shape the
income contexts are consuming levels of these foods in excess norms around foods that contribute to high-quality diets
of recommended levels. and incentivize suppliers and contractors to align their
value chains accordingly.
5 Make fuits, vegetables, pulses, nuts and seeds much more
available, more affordable and safe for all consumers. 10 Refocus agriculture research investments globally
They offer considerable benefits in terms of diet quality. There to support healthy diets and good nutrition. Global
are opportunities throughout the food system to overcome and national public research organizations (and their
supply-side barriers to make them available, affordable funders) must rebalance their priorities to reflect a priority
and appealing. Public policy can also incentivize greater focus on high-quality diets. Much more investment
investment in the infrastructure required to produce, store in research on fruits and vegetables, animal source
and transport these foods. foods, legumes, nuts and seeds is urgently required.
Better national-level and subnational data are needed on
diet, consumer food prices, food safety, food loss and waste.
The Access to Nutrition Index that assesses the conduct
and performance of companies should be strengthened
at the country level.
Box 8.1 Research priorities
Research within the food system needs to be driven to a Other indicators also need to be collected to help policy
greater extent by the desire to achieve high-quality diets. makers make the links between food systems and high-quality
For example, as the agenda-setting agricultural research diets. These include indicators related to consumer food
system, the CGIAR needs to review how it allocates its annual price series, food safety, food loss and waste, as well as those
US$1 billion research budget. Nutrition concerns should that monitor implications for the environment. We also need
not only be signalled in one of its challenge programmes scorecards to highlight those countries that have set targets
(Agriculture for Nutrition and Health), but in all of them. for diet improvement and actions to improve diets (including
The CGIAR needs to review how it allocates funding in relation policy, legislative and financial investments) and those
to the quality of the diets needed throughout the world. countries who have implemented these commitments
This may well affect its allocation by crop, by location and and to what effect.
by stage in the food value chain. CGIAR needs to work
with national agricultural research systems to support the The Access to Nutrition Index, which assesses the nutrition
development of mutual capacity to do this kind of work. performance of large, multinational firms, needs to be
Questions are also needed on what private sector research strengthened and much more work needs to be implemented
should be from a diet-quality perspective. at the country level to assess the conduct and performance
of companies in national markets. Companies that act to
There is an urgent need for better data and metrics for diet support high-quality diets should be congratulated and
quality and the food system. It is extraordinary that diet is the those that do not need to be encouraged to do better.
number one risk factor for the global burden of disease and A Global State of Food Systems report should be produced
yet the UN, to date, has no functioning global database on by an independent group of experts on an annual basis.
diet. Also, few national governments collect the data required
to inform decision makers about what people actually eat. This More and better evaluation is required.
report had to rely on a global database built by academics at Policy makers need to be able to assess the effect that
Tufts University in the US, supported by the Bill & Melinda specific interventions and policy actions have on diet
Gates Foundation. FAO and WHO should work closely with quality and to determine how they could be improved.
Tufts University to urgently populate the FAO/WHO GIFT For example, recent work to track changes in the purchases of
(FAO/WHO Global Individual Food Consumption data Tool) sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico following the imposition
database - and funders should be prepared to support them of a new tax sheds important light on consumer choices in a
in doing so. Other efforts to gather data such as the Global changing food environment.
Dietary Database (GDD) should also be built upon.
This report highlights the very serious challenges facing healthily is a moral and economic imperative. This will require
policy makers today and in the future. Already, approximately focused, determined and sustained action from policy makers
three billion people on the planet – from every country – have working in partnership with the private sector in complex and
low-quality diets. rapidly changing environments. With so much at stake, we all
share a responsibility to find solutions that work for everyone.
But this report also shows that current trends do not have to There are many public policy opportunities to act on in the food
persist if the right actions are taken now and in the coming system beyond agriculture to improve the consumer’s ability
decades. Better diets are possible. Ensuring that all people eat to access food that is safe, nutritious and affordable.
116 Chapter 8: A call to action

References
ACHARYA, T., FANZO, J., GUSTAFSON, D., INGRAM, J. & SCHNEE- BEZERRA, I.N., DE MOURA SOUZA, A., PEREIRA, R.A. & SICHIERI, R.
MAN, B. 2014. Assessing Sustainable Nutrition Security: The Role of 2013. Contribution of foods consumed away from home to energy
Food Systems. Washington, DC: ILSI, CIMSANS. intake in Brazilian urban areas: The 2008–9 Nationwide Dietary
Survey. British Journal of Nutrition, 109, 1276-83.
ADVERTISINGAGE. 2013. Global Marketers 2013. Accessed 16 Febru-
ary 2016. http://adage.com/datacenter/globalmarketers2013#302. BHUTTA, Z.A., DAS, J.K., RIZVI, A., GAFFEY, M.F., WALKER, N., HOR-
TON, S., WEBB, P., LARTEY, A. & BLACK, R.E. 2013. Evidence-based
AFFOGNON, H., MUTUNGI, C., SANGINGA, P. & BORGEMEISTER, interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition:
C. 2015. Unpacking postharvest losses in sub-Saharan Africa: A me- What can be done and at what cost? The Lancet, 382, 452-477.
ta-analysis. World Development, 66, 49-68.
BLACK, R.E., VICTORA, C.G., WALKER, S. P., BHUTTA, Z.A., CHRIS-
ALEXANDRATOS, N. & BRUINSMA, J. 2012. World agriculture TIAN, P., DE ONIS, M., EZZATI, M., GRANTHAM-MCGREGOR, S.,
towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision. ESA Working Paper No. 12-03. KATZ, J., MARTORELL, R. & UAUY, R. 2013. Maternal and child
Rome, FAO. undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income
countries. The Lancet, 382, 427-51.
ALSTON, J.M. & PARDEY, P.G. 2015. Agricultural R&D, Food Prices,
Poverty and Malnutrition Redux. In: SAHAN D.E., ed. 2015. The Fight BLACKMORE, E., ALONSO, S., & GRACE, D. 2015.Legitimising infor-
Against Hunger and Malnutrition. The Role of Food, Agriculture and mal markets: a case study of the dairy sector in Kenya. IIED Briefing
Targeted Policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 9. Papers. IIED.
ANDERSON, K. 2010. Globalization's effects on world agricultural BROWN-PAUL, C. 2014. Raising the roof [online]. Practical Hydropon-
trade, 1960–2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of ics and Greenhouses. Casper Publications, 143, 38-41.
London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 3007-21.
BRUNORI, G., GALLI, F., BARJOLLE, D., VAN BROEKHUIZEN, R.,
ASCHE, F., BELLEMARE, M.F., ROHEIM, C., SMITH, M.D. & TVETERAS, COLOMBO, L., GIAMPIETRO, M., KIRWAN, J., LANG, T., MATHIJS, E.,
S. 2015. Fair enough? Food security and the international trade of MAYE, D., DE ROEST, K., ROUGOOR, C., SCHWARZ, J., SCHMITT, E.,
seafood. World Development, 67, 151-160. SMITH, J., STOJANOVIC, Z., TISENKOPFS, T. & TOUZARD, J.-M. 2016.
Are local food chains more sustainable than global food chains?
BABU, S.C. & BLOM, S. 2014. Building resilience for food and nutrition Considerations for assessment. Sustainability, 8, 449.
security. 2020 Conference Brief 6. Washington DC: IFPRI.
BUCHER, T., COLLINS, C., ROLLO, M.E., MCCAFFREY, T.A., DE VLIEG-
BAKER, P. 2016. Project future trends of processed food consump- ER, N., VAN DER BEND, D., TRUBY, H. & PEREZ-CUETO, F.J. 2016.
tion. Working Paper No. 2. School of Regulation and Global Govern- Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: A systematic review
ance. Australian National University. of positional influences on food choice. British Journal of Nutrition,
115, 2252-63.
BAKER, P., KAY, A. & WALLS, H. 2014. Trade and investment liberali-
zation and Asia's noncommunicable disease epidemic: A synthesis of BURLINGAME, B. & DERNINI, S., eds. 2010. Sustainable diets and
data and existing literature. Global Health, 10, 66. biodiversity: Directions and solutions for policy, research and action.
Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium on Biodiversi-
BAKER, P., SMITH, J., SALMON, L., FRIEL, S., KENT, G., IELLAMO, A., ty and Sustainable Diets United Against Hunger. Rome: FAO.
DADHICH, J.P. & RENFREW, M.J. 2016. Global trends and patterns of
commercial milk-based formula sales: Is an unprecedented infant CAIRNS, G., ANGUS, K. & HASTINGS, G. 2009. The extent, nature
and young child feeding transition underway? Public Health Nutri- and effects of food promotion to children: A review of the evidence
tion, 1-11 to December 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization.
BAYO, A.O. 2006. City planning, city growth and food security: The CANNING, D., RAJA, S. & YAZBECK, A.B. 2015. Africa’s Demographic
inevitable trinity in the Nigerian food equation. Agricultural Journal, Transition Dividend or Disaster? Washington, DC: International Bank
1, 113-118. for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank.
BEREUTER D. & GLICKMAN, D. 2015. Healthy Food for a Healthy CANNING, P. 2013. ERS Food Dollar Series Allows an Indepth Look at
World: Leveraging Agriculture and Food to Improve Global Nutrition. Farm Level Components of the U.S. Food Dollar. Accessed 15 March
Chicago, US: The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. 2016, http://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2013-july/ers-food-dol-
lar-series-allows-an-indepth-look-at-farm-level-components-of-the-
us-food-dollar.aspx#.VuRatJOLRE6.
118 References
CAVALIERI, A. 2011. Former Vice-President and Director of Trait DEL GOBBO, L.C., KHATIBZADEH, S., IMAMURA, F., MICHA, R., SHI,
and Technology Development, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, 2009, P., SMITH, M., MYERS, S.S. & MOZAFFARIAN, D. 2015. Assessing
personal communication. global dietary habits: A comparison of national estimates from FAO
and the Global Dietary Database. The American Journal of Clinical
CEBALLOS, F., HERNANDEZ, M.A., MINOT, N. & ROBLES, M. 2016. Nutrition, 101, 1038-46.
Transmission of Food Price Volatility from International to Domestic
Markets: Evidence from Africa, Latin America and South Asia. In: DEL POZO-VERGNES, E. & VORLEY, B. 2015. Global or local food
KALKUHL, M., VON BRAUN J. & TORERO, M., eds. 2016. Food Price chains? Uncovering the dilemmas in Senegal and Peru. Issue paper,
Volatility and Its Implications for Food Security and Policy. NY: Spring- September 2015, International Institute for Development. London,
er International Publishing. pp.303-328. UK: IIED.
CHANDON, P. & WANSINK, B. 2012. Does food marketing need to DILLON, A., MCGEE, K. & OSENI, G. 2015. Agricultural production,
make us fat? A review and solutions. Nutrition Reviews, 10, 571-593. dietary diversity and climate variability. Journal of Development
Studies, 51, 976-995.
CHAVAS, J.P., HUMMELS, D. & WRIGHT, B.D. eds. 2014. The econom-
ics of food price volatility. Cambridge, Chicago, IL: National Bureau of DIXON, J. 2015. IUHPE Position Paper: Advancing health promoting
Economic Research, University of Chicago Press. food systems. International Union for Health Promotion and Educa-
tion. Paris: IUHPE
COLCHERO, M.A., SALGADO, J.C., UNAR-MUNGUIA, M., HERNAN-
DEZ-AVILA, M. & RIVERA-DOMMARCO, J.A. 2015. Price elasticity DOWNS, S.M. & FANZO, J. 2015. Is a cardio-protective diet sustain-
of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in able? A review of the synergies and tensions between foods that
Mexico. Economics & Human Biology, 19, 129-37. promote the health of the heart and the planet. Current Nutrition
Reports, 4, 313-322.
COMBS, G.F., WELCH, R.M., DUXBURY, J.M., UPHOFF, N.T. & NE-
SHEIM, M.C. 1996. Food-based approaches to preventing micronu- DOWNS, S.M., SINGH, A., GUPTA, V., LOCK, K. & GHOSH-JERATH,
trient malnutrition: An international research agenda. Conference S. 2015. The need for multisectoral food chain approaches to reduce
Paper. Cornell International. trans fat consumption in India. BMC Public Health, 15, 693.
CORNIA, G.A., DEOTTI, L. & SASSI, M. 2016. Sources of food price DU, L. 2014. Leveraging agriculture for nutritional impact through the
volatility and child malnutrition in Niger and Malawi. Food Policy, 30, Feed the Future Initiative: Landscape analysis of activities across 19
20-30. focus countries. Arlington, VA: United States Agency for Internation-
al Development (USAID)/Strengthening Partnerships, Results and
CRITCHLEY, J., CAPEWELL, S., O'FLAHERTY, M., ABU-RMEILEH, N., Innovations in Nutrition Globally Project.
RASTAM, S., SAIDI, O., SÖZMEN, K., SHOAIBI, A., HUSSEINI, A.,
FOUAD, F. & MANSOUR, N.B. 2016. Contrasting cardiovascular DURIAUX J.Y. & BAUDRON F. 2015. Landscape mosaics and rural live-
mortality trends in Eastern Mediterranean populations: Contribu- lihoods along an intensification gradient in Arsi-Negele, Ethiopia. The
tions from risk factor changes and treatments. International Journal new agrarian change. Technical Project Report, September 2015.
of Cardiology, 208, 150-161
EAMES-SHEAVLY, M., HADEKEL, C., HEDSTROM, A. M., PATCHEN,
DARMON, N. & DREWNOWSKI, A. 2015. Contribution of food prices A., STEWART, R. & WILKINS, J. 2011. Discovering our food system:
and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: Experiential learning and action for youth and their communities.
A systematic review and analysis. Nutrition Reviews, 73, 643-660. Cornell University, Department of Horticulture.
DAWAR, N. & FROST, T. 1999. Competing with giants: Survival ELLIOT, V., LUTTER, C., LAMSTEIN, S., KONIZ-BOOHER, P. &
strategies for local companies in emerging markets. Harvard Business CAULFIELD L. 2015. Systematic review of the dietary intakes of ado-
Review, 77, 119-29. lescent girls in low-and middle-Income countries. The FASEB Journal,
29.
DE BRAUW, A., EOZENOU, P. & MOURSI, M. 2015. Program par-
ticipation Intensity and children's nutritional status: Evidence from ERICKSEN, P.J. 2008. Conceptualizing food systems for global environ-
a randomized control trial in Mozambique. HarvestPlus Working mental change research. Global Environmental Change, 18, 234-245.
Paper. No 16. Harvest Plus.
ETH (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich). 2016. 2016 KOF
DE SCHUTTER, O. 2010. Addressing concentration in food supply Index of Globalization. Accessed 7 May 2016 http://globalization.kof.
chains. The role of competition law in tackling the abuse of buyer ethz.ch/media/filer_public/2016/03/03/method_2016.pdf.
power. Briefing Note 03. United Nations Special Rapporteur on the
Right to Food. EVENSON, R.E. & GOLLIN, D. 2003. Assessing the impact of the green
revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science, 300, 758-62.
FANZO, J., COGILL, B. & MATTEI, F. 2012. Metrics of Sustainable Diets FAO. 2016a. Fruit and vegetable products. Corporate Document
and Food Systems. Rome: Bioversity International. Repository. Accessed 21 May 2016, http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/
x5434e/x5434e05.htm#TopOfPage.
FAO (FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED
NATIONS) & FHI 360. 2014. Introducing the minimum dietary diver- FAO. 2016b. Food-based dietary guidelines. Accessed 1 February
sity – women (MDD-W) global dietary diversity indicator for women. 2016 http://www.fao.org/nutrition/nutrition-education/food-die-
Rome: FAO. tary-guidelines/en/.
FAO & ITPS (Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils). 2015. FAO. 2016c. ICN2 Second International Conference on Nutrition: Better
Status of the world’s soil resources (SWSR) – Main Report. Rome, Italy: Nutrition, Better Lives. Accessed 20 May 2016, http://www.fao.org/
(ITPS) FAO. about/meetings/icn2/news/news-detail/en/c/264683/.
FAO & WHO (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION). 2001. Human vi- FAO. 2016d. UN General Assembly proclaims Decade of Action on
tamin and mineral requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert Nutrition. Accessed 21 May 2016, http://www.fao.org/news/story/
consultation – Bangkok, Thailand. Rome: FAO. en/item/408970/icode/.
FAO & WHO. 2007. FAO/WHO Framework for the provision of scientif- FAO. 2016e. Urban agriculture. Accessed 6 May 2016, http://www.fao.
ic advice on food safety and nutrition. Rome: FAO/WHO. org/urban-agriculture/en/.
FAO & EU (European Union). 2010. Guidelines for measuring house- FOOD ENGINEERING. 2016. The World’s Top 100 Food and Beverage
hold and individual dietary diversity. Rome: FAO. Companies. Accessed 11 February 2016 http://www.foodengi-
neeringmag.com/search?q=The+World%E2%80%99s+Top+100+-
FAO, IFAD (INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVEL- Food+and+BBeverag+Companies.
OPMENT) & WFP (WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME). 2015a. Achieving
zero hunger: The critical role of investments in social protection and FRIEL, S., LABONTE, R. & SANDERS, D. 2013. Measuring progress on
agriculture. Rome. FAO. diet-related NCDs: The need to address the causes of the causes. The
Lancet, 381, 903-4.
FAO, IFAD & WFP. 2015b. The state of food insecurity in the world
2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: Taking stock of FUGLIE, K. & RADA, N. 2013. Growth in Global Agricultural Produc-
uneven progress. Rome: FAO. tivity: An Update. Accessed 25 April 2016, http://www.ers.usda.gov/
amber-waves/2013-november/growth-in-global-agricultural-produc-
FAO, WHO & UNU (UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY). 2001. Human tivity-an-update.aspx#.VuReXZOLRE4.
energy requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Con-
sultation. Rome: FAO. FUGLIE, K., HEISEY, P., KING, J.L., PRAY, C.E., DAY-RUBENSTEIN, K.,
SCHIMMELPFENNIG, D., WANG, S.L. & KARMARKAR-DESHMUKH,
FAO. 2004. Globalization of food systems in developing countries: A R. 2011. Research investments and market structure in the food
synthesis of country case studies. Chapter 1: KENNEDY, G., NANTEL, processing, agriculture input and biofuel industries worldwide. Report
G. AND SHETTY, P. Rome: FAO. No130. Washington, DC: Economic Research Services, United States
Department of Agriculture.
FAO. 2010. The Impact of global change and urbanization on house-
hold food security. Nutrition & Food Safety. Accessed 20 April 2016 GARNETT, T. 2014. What is a sustainable healthy diet? FCRN Discus-
http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/nutrition/national_urbanization_en.stm. sion Paper. FCRN: University of Oxford. Accessed 25 February 2016
http://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/fcrn_what_is_a_sustaina-
FAO. 2011. Global food losses and food waste: Extent, causes and ble_healthy_diet_final.pdf.
prevention. Rome: FAO.
GARNETT, T. 2016. Future trends in the production, transformation,
FAO. 2013. The state of food and agriculture 2013: Food systems for food environment and consumption for animal-based foods. Working
better nutrition. Rome: FAO. Paper No 6. Environment Change Institute. Oxford University Centre
for the Environment.
FAO. 2015a. FAOSTAT – Food balance sheets. Accessed 15 February
2016, http://faostat3.fao.org/download/FB/*/E. GIRARD, A.W., SELF, J.L., MCAULIFFE, C. & OLUDE, O. 2012. The
effects of household food production strategies on the health and
FAO. 2015b. The state of agricultural commodity markets – Trade nutrition outcomes of women and young children: A systematic
and food security: Achieving a better balance between national review. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 26, 205-22.
priorities and the collective good. Rome: FAO.
GLADEK, E., FRASER, M., ROEMERS, G., MUS, G., MUMIOLOGY, C. &
OLUDE, O. 2016. The Global Food System: An Analysis. Amsterdam,
The Netherlands: Metabolic/WWF Netherlands.
120 References
GLANZ, K., SALLIS, J.F., SAELENS, B.E. & FRANK, L.D. 2005. Healthy GODFRAY, H.C. & GARNETT, T. 2014. Food security and sustainable
nutrition environments: Concepts and measures. American Journal of intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of
Health Promotion, 19, 330-3. London B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20120273.
GLIESSMAN, S.R. 2007. Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food GÓMEZ, M.I. & RICKETTS, K.D. 2013. Food value chain
Systems. 2nd edn. UK: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group. transformations in developing countries: Selected hypotheses on
nutritional implications. ESA Working Paper No. 13-05. Rome: FAO.
GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE STUDY 2013. COLLABORATORS:
FOROUZANFAR, M.H., ALEXANDER, L., ANDERSON, H.R., GONZALEZ FISCHER, C. & GARNETT, T. 2016. Plates, pyramids,
BACHMAN, V.F., BIRYUKOV, S., BRAUER, M., BURNETT, R., CASEY, D., planet developments in national healthy and sustainable dietary
COATES, M.M., COHEN, A., et al. 2015. Global, regional and national guidelines: A state of play assessment. FAO and the University of
comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental Oxford.
and occupational and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188
countries, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of GORYAKIN, Y., LOBSTEIN, T., JAMES, W.P. & SUHRCKE, M. 2015. The
Disease Study 2013. The Lancet, 386, 2287-323, doi: 10.1016/S0140– impact of economic, political and social globalization on overweight
6736(15)00128-2. and obesity in the 56 low- and middle-income countries. Social
Science and Medicine, 133, 67-76.
GLOBAL NUTRITION AND POLICY CONSORTIUM. 2014. The Global
Dietary Database: Measuring diet in countries worldwide. Accessed GRACE, D. 2015. Food safety in low- and middle-income countries.
20 February 2016 http://www.globaldietarydatabase.org/the-global- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12,
dietary-database-measuring-diet-worldwide.html. 10490-507.
GLOBAL PANEL ON AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS FOR GREEN, R., CORNELSEN, L., DANGOUR, A.D., TURNER, R.,
NUTRITION (GLOBAL PANEL). 2014. How can agriculture and food SHANKAR, B., MAZZOCCHI, M. & SMITH, R. D. 2013. The effect
system policies improve nutrition? Technical Brief, London, UK: Global of rising food prices on food consumption: Systematic review with
Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition. meta-regression. British Medical Journal, 346, f3703, doi: http://doi.
org/10.1136/bmj.f3703.
GLOBAL PANEL. 2015a. Climate smart food systems for enhanced
nutrition. Policy Brief. London, UK: Global Panel on Agriculture and HADDAD, L., BROWN, L.R., RICHTER, A. & SMITH, L. 1995. The
Food Systems for Nutrition. gender dimensions of economic adjustment policies: potential
interactions and evidence to date. World Development, 30, 881-96.
GLOBAL PANEL. 2015b. Biofortification: An agricultural investment
for nutrition. Policy Brief. London, UK: Global Panel on Agriculture HADDAD, L., NISBETT, N., BARNETT, I. & VALLI, E. 2014.
and Food Systems for Nutrition. Maharashtra’s Child Stunting Declines: What Is Driving Them? Findings
of a Multidisciplinary Analysis. Brighton: Institute of Development
GLOBAL PANEL. 2015c. Healthy meals in schools: Policy innovations Studies.
linking agriculture, food systems and nutrition. Policy Brief. London,
UK: Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition. HASTINGS, G., STEAD, M., MCDERMOTT, L., FORSYTH, A.,
MACKINTOSH, A.M., RAYNER, M., GODFREY, C., CARAHER, M. &
GLOBAL PANEL. 2015d. Improved metrics and data are needed for ANGUS K. 2003. Review of research on the effects of food promotion
effective food system policies in the post-2015 era. Technical Brief. to children. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, Centre for Social
London, UK: Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Marketing.
Nutrition.
HASTINGS, G., MCDERMOTT, L., ANGUS K., STEAD, M. &
GLOBAL PANEL. 2016a. Managing food price volatility: Policy options THOMPSON, S. 2006. The extent, nature and effects of food promotion
to support healthy diets and nutrition in the context of uncertainty. to children: A review of the evidence. Technical Paper prepared for the
Policy Brief. London, UK: Global Panel on Agriculture and Food World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Systems for Nutrition.
HATANAKA, M., BAIN, C. & BUSCH, L. 2006. Differentiated
GLOBAL PANEL. 2016b. Assuring safe food systems: Policy options standardization, standardized differentiation: The complexity of the
for a healthier food supply. Policy Brief. London, UK: Global Panel on global agrifood system. Research in Rural Sociology and Development,
Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition. 12, 39–68.
GLOBAL PANEL. 2016c. Nutrition for Growth II, from Commitment to HAWKES, C. 2002. Marketing activities of global soft drink and fast
Action. Recommendations to Improve Nutrition through Agriculture food companies in emerging markets: A Review. In: WHO. 2002.
and Food Systems. Policy Brief No.6. London, UK: Global Panel on Globalization, Diets and Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: WHO.
Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition.
HAWKES, C. 2010. The influence of trade liberalization and global HODDINOTT, J., HEADEY, D. & DEREJE, M. 2015. Cows, missing
dietary change: The case of vegetable oils, meat and highly processed milk markets and nutrition in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Development
foods. In: HAWKES C., BLOUIN C., HENSON S., DRAGER N. & DUBÉ Studies, 51, 958-975.
L., eds. 2010. Trade, Food, Diet and Health: Perspectives and Policy
Options. Wiley-Blackwell; Hoboken, NJ. pp. 35–59. HODDINOTT, J., MALUCCIO, J.A., BEHRMAN, J.R., FLORES, R. &
MARTORELL, R. 2008. Effect of a nutrition intervention during early
HAWKES, C. 2014. Promotional marketing. A driver of the modern childhood on economic productivity in Guatemalan adults. The
food system. In: NEEF, R. 2014. Introduction to the US Food System: Lancet, 371, 411-6.
Public Health, Environment and Equity. The Johns Hopkins Center for
a Livable Future. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand; San Francisco: CA: 2014. HORTON, S. & STECKEL, R.H. 2013. Malnutrition. Global economic
pp. 237-261. losses attributable to malnutrition 1900–2000 and projections to
2050. In: LOMBORG, B., ed. 2013. How Much Have Global Problems
HAWKES, C. 2015. Enhancing coherence between trade policy and Cost the World? A Scorecard from 1900 to 2050. Cambridge: Cam-
nutrition action implementing the Framework for Action of the Second bridge University Press. pp. 247-272.
International Conference on Nutrition. Geneva: United Nations Stand-
ing Committee on Nutrition. HOSSAIN, N., KING, R., WANJIKU KELBERT, A., SCOTT-VILLIERS, P. &
CHISHOLM, N. 2015. Delicious, disgusting, dangerous: Eating in a time
HAWKES, C., BLOUIN C., HENSON, S., DRAGER, N. & DUBÉ, L. 2009. of food price volatility. Institute of Development Studies and Oxfam
Trade, Food, Diet and Health: Perspectives and Policy Options. Oxford, International.
U.K. John Wiley and Sons.
HUANG, S. 2010. Global trade of fruits and vegetables and the role of
HAWKES, C., FRIEL, S., LOBSTEIN, T., & LANG, T. 2012. . Linking agri- consumer demand. In: HAWKES, C., BLOUIN, C., HENSON S., DRAG-
cultural policies with obesity and non-communicable diseases: a new ER N. & DUBÉ L., eds. Trade, Food, Diet and Health: Perspectives and
perspective for a globalizing world. Food Policy, 37, 343-353 Policy Options. Wiley-Blackwell; Hoboken, NJ: 2010. pp. 60-76.
HAWKES, C., GRACE, D. & THOW, A.M. 2015. Trade liberalization, IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute). 2014. Global nu-
food, nutrition and health. In: SMITH, R., BLOUIN, C., MIRZA, Z., trition report 2014: Actions and accountability to accelerate the world’s
BEYER, P. & DRAGER, N. Trade and Health: Towards a National Strate- progress on nutrition. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
gy, p.92. Geneva, WHO.
IFPRI. 2015a. Global nutrition report 2015: Actions and accountability
HAWKES, C., SMITH, T.G., JEWELL, J., WARDLE, J., HAMMOND, R.A., to advance nutrition and sustainable development. Washington, DC:
FRIEL, S., THOW, A.M. & KAIN, J. 2015. Smart food policies for obesi- IFPRI.
ty prevention. The Lancet, 385, 2410-2421.
IFPRI. 2015b. Global nutrition report: Nutrition country profile 2014:
HEADEY, D.D. & HODDINOTT, J. 2014. Understanding the rapid Colombia. Washington, DC: IFPRI. Accessed 26 May 2016 http://
reduction of undernutrition in Nepal, 2001–2011. PLOS ONE, 23, ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/129911/file-
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145738. name/130122.pdf.
HEADEY, D., HODDINOTT, J., ALI, D., TESFAYE, R. & DEREJE, M. 2015. IFPRI. 2015c. Global nutrition report: Nutrition country profile: United
The other Asian enigma: Explaining the rapid reduction of undernu- Republic of Tanzania. Washington, DC: IFPRI. Accessed 26 May
trition in Bangladesh. World Development, 66, 749-761, doi:10.1016/j. 2016 http://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/
worlddev.2014.09.022. id/129845/filename/130056.pdf.
HENDRY, V.L., ALMÍRON-ROIG, E., MONSIVAIS, P., JEBB, S.A., BENJA- IFPRI. 2016a. Global nutrition report 2016: From promise to impact:
MIN NEELON, S.E., GRIFFIN, S.J. & OGILVIE, D.B. 2015. Impact of reg- Ending malnutrition by 2030. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
ulatory interventions to reduce intake of artificial trans-fatty acids: A
systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 105, e32-42. IFPRI. 2016b. 2016 Global food policy report. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
HERFORTH, A. & AHMED, S. 2015. The food environment, its effects IMAMURA, F., MICHA, R., KHATIBZADEH, S., FAHIMI, S., SHI, P.,
on dietary consumption and potential for measurement within agri- POWLES, J. & MOZAFFARIAN, D. 2015. Dietary quality among men
culture-nutrition interventions. Food Security, 7, 505-20. and women in 187 countries in 1990 and 2010: A systematic assess-
ment. Lancet Global Health, 3, e132–42.
HLPE (High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition).
2014. Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems. IOM (INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE) and NRC (NATIONAL RESEARCH
A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and COUNCIL). 2015. A Framework for Assessing Effects of The Food Sys-
Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome: HLPE. tem. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
122 References
IPES-FOOD (INTERNATIONAL PANEL OF EXPERTS ON SUSTAIN- MALIK, V.S., WILLETT, W.C. & HU, F.B. 2013. Global obesity: Trends,
ABLE FOOD SYSTEMS). 2015. The new science of sustainable food risk factors and policy implications. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 9,
systems: Overcoming barriers to food systems reform. IPES-food. 13-27.
JONES, A.D., SHRINIVAS, A. & BEZNER-KERR, R. 2014. Farm MASSET, E., HADDAD, L., CORNELIUS, A. & ISAZA-CASTRO, J. 2012.
production diversity is associated with greater household dietary Effectiveness of agricultural interventions that aim to improve nu-
diversity in Malawi: Findings from nationally representative data. tritional status of children: Systematic review. British Medical Journal
Food Policy, 46, 1–12. 344:d8222.
KELLY, T., YANG, W., CHEN, C.S., REYNOLDS, K. & HE, J. 2008. Global MASTERS, W. 2016. Assessment of current diets: Recent trends by in-
burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. International come and region. Working paper No 4. Friedman School of Nutrition
Journal of Obesity (Lond), 32, 1431-7. Science and Policy and Department of Economics. Tufts University.
KHOURY, C.K. & JARVIS, A. 2014. The changing composition of the MATUSCHKE, I. 2009. Rapid urbanization and food security: Using
global diet: Implications for CGIAR research. CIAT Policy Brief No. 18. food density maps to identify future food security hotspots. Inter-
Accessed 25 February 2016, https://ciat.cgiar.org/wp-content/up- national Association of Agricultural Economist Conference. Beijing,
loads/2014/11/policy_brief_global_diets.pdf. China: FAO.
KITINOJA, L. 2013. Returnable plastic crate (RPC) systems can reduce MAYÉN, A.L., MARQUES-VIDAL, P., PACCAUD, F., BOVET, P. &
postharvest losses and improve earnings for fresh produce operations. STRINGHINI, S. 2014. Socioeconomic determinants of dietary pat-
PEF White Paper No. 13-01. Oregon, USA: Postharvest Education terns in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. The
Foundation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100, 1520-31.
KOTHARI, M.T., ABDERRAHIM, N., COILE, A. & CHENG, Y. 2014. MAZUR, R., HENDRICH, S., JENSEN, H., MURPHY, P., REDDY, M.,
Nutritional Status of Women and Children. Rockville, Maryland, USA: WESTGATE, M., NAKIMBUGWE, D., UGEN, M., MUSOKE, H.K.,
ICF International. VASANTHAKAALAM, H., NAKIMULI, A., ELEPU, G. & KIIZA, B. 2012.
Enhancing Nutritional Value and Marketability of Beans through
KUMAR, N., HARRIS, J. & RAWAT, R. 2015. If they grow it, will they Research and Strengthening Key Value Chain Stakeholders in Uganda
eat and grow? Evidence from Zambia on agricultural diversity and and Rwanda. 2020 Conference Note 1. Washington, D.C. Internation-
child undernutrition. Journal of Development Studies, 51, 1060-77. al Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
LACHAT, C., NAGO, E., VERSTRAETEN, R., ROBERFROID, D., VAN MCCAULEY, D.J., PINSKY, M.L., PALUMBI, S.R., ESTES, J.A., JOYCE, F.H.
CAMP, J. & KOLSTEREN, P. 2012. Eating out of home and its associa- & WARNER, R.R. 2015. Marine defaunation: Animal loss in the global
tion with dietary intake: A systematic review of the evidence. Obesity ocean. Science, 347, 1255641.
Reviews, 13, 329-46.
MCGINNIS, J.M., GOOTMAN, J.A. & KRAAK, V.I. eds. 2006. Food
LAKNER, C., NEGRE, M. & PRYDZ, E.B. 2014. Twinning the goals: How marketing to children and youth: Threat or opportunity? Washington
can promoting shared prosperity help to reduce global poverty? World D.C. Institute of Medicine of The National Academies.
Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7106. Development Research
Group Poverty and Inequality Team. MEADE, B., THORNSBURY, S., CALVIN, L. & MUHAMMAD, A. 2016.
Future trends in vegetables and fruit: Production, trade, consumption
LEROY, J.L., RUEL, M., FRONGILLO, E.A., HARRIS, J. & BALLARD, and policy options. Working Paper No 7. Economic Research Service/
T.J. 2015. Measuring the food access dimension of food security: A USDA.
critical review and mapping of indicators. Food and Nutrition Bulletin,
36, 167-95. MEHROTRA, S. 2015. Realising the Demographic Dividend Policies to
Achieve Inclusive Growth in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University
LIPINSKI, B., HANSON, C., LOMAX, J., KITINOJA, L., WAITE, R. & Press.
SEARCHINGER, T. 2013. Reducing food loss and waste. Working Paper,
Instalment 2 of Creating a Sustainable Food Future. Washington, DC: MICHA, R., KHATIBZADEH, S., SHI, P., FAHIMI, S., LIM, S., ANDREWS,
World Resources Institute. K.G., ENGELL, R.E., POWLES, J., EZZATI, M. & MOZAFFARIAN, D.
2014. Global, regional and national consumption levels of dietary
LIU, X. & ZHU, C. 2014. Will knowing diabetes affect labor income? fats and oils in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis including 266
Evidence from a natural experiment. Economic Letters, 124, 74-78. country-specific nutrition surveys. British Medical Journal, 348, g2272,
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008705.
LUO, H., ZHU, M., YE, S., HOU, H., CHEN Y, & BULYSHEVA, L. 2016.
An intelligent tracking system based on internet of things for the
cold chain. Internet Research, 26, 435-45.
MILJKOVIC, D., SHAIK, S., MIRANDA, S., BARABANOV, N. & LIO- NEVEN, D., REARDON, T., CHEGE, J. & WANG, H. 2006. Supermar-
GIER, A. 2015. Globalisation and Obesity. The World Economy, 38, kets and consumers in Africa: The case of Nairobi, Kenya. Journal
1278-94, doi: 10.1111/twec.12260. of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing, 18, doi:10.1300/
J047v18n01_06.
MILLER, D. 2016. Agriculture and micronutrient availability. In:
PRITCHARD, B., ORTIZ, R. & SHEKAR, M., eds. 2016. Routledge Hand- NORRIS, S.A., WROTTESLEY, S., MOHAMED, R.S. & MICKLESFIELD,
book of Food and Nutrition Security. New York: Routledge. pp. 75-95. L.K. 2014. Africa in transition: growth trends in children and implica-
tions for nutrition. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 22, 8-13.
MILNER, J., GREEN, R., DANGOUR, A.D., HAINES, A., CHALABI, Z.,
SPADARO, J., MARKANDYA, A. & WILKINSON, P. 2015. Health ef- O'DONNELL, O., NICOLÁS, A.L. & DOORSLAER, E.V. 2009. Growing
fects of adopting low greenhouse gas emission diets in the UK. British richer and taller: Explaining change in the distribution of child nutri-
Medical Journal Open, 5, e007364. tional status during Vietnam's economic boom. Journal of Develop-
ment Economics, 88, 45-58.
MINOT, N. 2014. Food price volatility in sub-Saharan Africa: Has it
really increased?. Food Policy, 30, 45-56. OLNEY, D.K., PEDEHOMBGA, A., RUEL, M.T. & DILLON, A. 2015.
A 2-year integrated agriculture and nutrition and health behavior
MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL. 2016a. Unleashing a Global Snacking change communication program targeted to women in Burkina
Powerhouse. 2016 Fact Sheet. Accessed 21 June 2016. http://www. Faso reduces anemia, wasting and diarrhea in children 3–12 months
mondelezinternational.com/~/media/MondelezCorporate/Uploads/ of age at baseline: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Journal of
downloads/mondelez_intl_fact_sheet.pdf. Nutrition, 145, 1317-1324.
MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL. 2016b. Investing in BRIC Markets. O’NEILL, B.C., KRIEGLER, E., RIAHI, K., EBI, K.L., HALLEGATTE, S.,
2016 Fact Sheet. Accessed 21 June 2016. http://www.mondelezin- CARTER, T.R., MATHUR, R. & VAN VUUREN D.P. 2014. A new sce-
ternational.com/~/media/mondelezcorporate/uploads/downloads/ nario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared
ininvesti_in_bric_markets.pdf. socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change, 122, 387–400.
MONTEIRO, C.A., BENICIO, M.H.D.A., KONNO, S.C., SILVA, A.C.F.D., PAHO (PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION). 2015. Ul-
LIMA, A.L.L.D. & CONDE, W.L. 2009. Causes for the decline in child tra-processed food and drink products in Latin America: Trends,
under-nutrition in Brazil, 1996–2007. Revista de Saude Publica, 43, impact on obesity, policy implications. Washington, DC: PAHO.
35-43.
PARDEY, P.G., ALSTON, J.M. & PIGGOTT, R.R. 2006. Agricultural R&D
MURRELL, D. 2016. Global Research and Funding Survey on Pulse Pro- in the developing world: Too little, too late? Washington, DC: IFPRI.
ductivity and Sustainability. Dubai, UAE: Global Pulse Confederation.
PINGALI, P.L. 2012. Green revolution: Impacts, limits and the path
MYERS, S.S., WESSELLS, K.R., KLOOG, I., ZANOBETTI, A. & ahead. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United
SCHWARTZ, J. 2015. Effect of increased concentrations of atmos- States of America, 109, 12302-12308.
pheric carbon dioxide on the global threat of zinc deficiency: A
modelling study. Lancet Global Health, 3, e639-45. PINSTRUP-ANDERSEN, P., ed. 2015. Food Price Policy in an Era of
Market Instability: A Political Economy Analysis. Oxford: Oxford
NATAWIDJAJA, R., REARDON, T. & SHETTY, S. 2007. Horticultural University Press.
Producers and Supermarket Development in Indonesia. Jakarta, Indo-
nesia: World Bank. POPKIN, B.M. & SLINING, M. 2013. New dynamics in global obesity
facing low- and middle-income countries. Obesity Reviews, 14, 11-20,
NCD RISK FACTOR COLLABORATION (NCD-RisC). 2016. Trends in doi:10.1111/obr.12102.
adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: A pooled
analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 RAO, M., AFSHIN, A., SINGH, G. & MOZAFFARIAN, D. 2013. Do
million participants. The Lancet, 387, 1377-96. healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy op-
tions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal
NEFF, R.A., MERRIGAN, K. & WALLINGA, D. 2015. A food systems Open, 3, e004277.
approach to healthy food and agriculture policy. Health Affairs, 34,
1908-15. REARDON, T. 2004. The Rise of Supermarkets in Mexico. LAC Bureau
Poverty Reduction. Washington, DC: Chemonics International Inc.
NELSON, G.C., VALIN, H., SANDS, R.D., HAVLIK, P., AHAMMAD, H.,
DERYNG, D., ELLIOTT, J., FUJIMORI, S., HASEGAWA, T., HEYHOE, E., REARDON, T. 2015. The hidden middle: The quiet revolution in the
et al. 2014. Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic respons- midstream of agrifood value chains in developing countries. Oxford
es to biophysical shocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Review of Economic Policy, 31, 45-63.
Science of the United States of America, 111, 3274-9.
124 References
REARDON, T.A. 2016. Growing Food for Growing Cities: Transform- SETO, K.C. & RAMANKUTTY, N. 2016. Hidden linkages between
ing Food Systems in an Urbanizing World. Chicago, US: The Chicago urbanization and food systems. Science, 352, 943-5.
Council on Global Affairs.
SIBHATU, K.T., KRISHNA, V.V & QAIM, M. 2015. Production diversity
REARDON, T. & TIMMER, C.P. 2012. The economics of the food sys- and dietary diversity in smallholder farm households. Proceedings of
tem revolution. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2012, 225-264. the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 10657-10662.
REARDON, T. & TIMMER, C.P. 2014. Five inter-linked transformations SIEGEL, K.R., ALI, M.K., SRINIVASIAH, A., NUGENT, R.A. & NARAYAN,
in the Asian agrifood economy: Food security implications. Global K.V. 2014. Do we produce enough fruits and vegetables to meet
Food Security, 3, 108-117. global health need? PLOS ONE, 9, e104059.
REARDON, T., TIMMER, C.P., BARRETT, C.B. & BERDEGUE, J. 2003. SKOUFIAS, E., TIWARI, S. & ZAMAN, H. 2011. Can we rely on cash
The rise of supermarkets in Africa, Asia and Latin America. American transfers to protect dietary diversity during food crises? Estimates from
Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 1140-1146. Indonesia. Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS 5548. Washing-
ton, DC: World Bank.
REMANS, R., WOOD, S.A., SAHA, N., ANDERMAN, T.L. & DEFRIES,
R.S. 2014. Measuring nutritional diversity of national food sup- SMITH, M.R., SINGH, G.M., MOZAFFARIAN, D. & MYERS, S.S. 2015.
plies. Global Food Security, 3, 174-182, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. Effects of decreases of animal pollinators on human nutrition and
gfs.2014.07.001. global health: A modelling analysis. The Lancet, 386, 1964-72.
ROBERTO, C.A., SWINBURN, B., HAWKES, C., HUANG, T.T., COSTA, SOBAL, J., KHAN, L.K. & BISOGNI, C. 1998. A conceptual model of
S.A., ASHE, M., ZWICKER, L., CAWLEY, J.H. & BROWNELL, K.D. 2015. the food and nutrition system. Social Science and Medicine, 47, 853-
Patchy progress on obesity prevention: Emerging examples, en- 863.
trenched barriers and new thinking. The Lancet, 385, 2400-2409.
SOLABILITY SUTAINABLE INTELIGENCE. 2016. Natural capital. The
ROBINSON, S.,MASON-D'CROZ D., ISLAM S, SULSER T.B., ROBERT- given physical environment: Natural capital. Accessed 10 July 2016,
SON R., ZHU T., GUENEAU A., PITOIS G. & ROSEGRANT, M. 2015. http://solability.com/the-global-sustainable-competitiveness-index/
The international model for policy analysis of agricultural commodities the-index/natural-capital.
and trade (IMPACT); Model description for version 3. IFPRI Discussion
Paper. International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC: SPRINGMANN, M., GODFRAY, H. C. J., RAYNER, M., SCARBOR-
IFPRI. OUGH, P. 2016a. Analysis and valuation of the health and climate
change cobenefits of dietary change, Proceedings of the National
ROCHA, C. & LESSA, I. 2009. Urban governance for food security: Academy of Sciences of the United States, 113 (15), 4146–4151.
The alternative food system in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. International
Planning Studies, 14, 389-400. SPRINGMANN, M., GODFRAY, H.C., RAYNER, M. & SCARBOR-
OUGH, P. 2016b. Analysis and valuation of the health and climate
ROESEL, K. & GRACE, D. eds. 2015. Food Safety and Informal Markets: change cobenefits of dietary change. Proceedings of the National
Animal Products in Sub-Saharan Africa. London, UK: Routledge. Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 4146-4151.
doi:10.1073/pnas.1523119113.
RUEL, M.T. & ALDERMAN, H. 2013. Nutrition-sensitive interventions
and programmes: How can they help to accelerate progress in im- SPRINGMANN, M., MASON-D'CROZ, D., ROBINSON, S., WIEBE, K.,
proving maternal and child nutrition? The Lancet, 382, 536-551. SCARBOROUGH, P. 2016c. Projections of food consumption and the
health impacts associated with changes in dietary and weight-related
RUIZ-GARCIA, L., LUNADEI, L., BARREIRO, P. & ROBLA, J.I. 2009. A risk factors. Working Paper No 1. University of Oxford. https://oxris.
review of wireless sensor technologies and applications in agriculture ox.ac.uk/repository.html?pub=664306.
and food industry: State of the art and current trends. Sensors, 9,
4728-50. STATISTA. 2016. Largest global advertisers in 2013, by ad spending (in
billion U.S. dollars). Accessed 16 February 2016, http://www.statista.
SAMADI, S. 2014. Applications and Opportunities for Internet-based com/statistics/286448/largest-global-advertisers/.
Technologies in the Food Industry. In the Sixth International Confer-
ence on Advances in Future Internet, AFIN, Lisbon, Portugal, 67-71. STEYN, N.P., MCHIZA, Z., HILL, J., DAVIDS, Y.D., VENTER, I., HIN-
RICHSEN, E., OPPERMAN, M., RUMBELOW, J. & JACOBS, P. 2014.
SCHWINGSHACKL, L. & HOFFMANN, G. 2015. Diet quality as Nutritional contribution of street foods to the diet of people in
assessed by the healthy eating index, the alternate healthy eating developing countries: A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition, 1,
index, the dietary approaches to stop hypertension score and health 1363-74.
outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 115, 780-800 e5.
STORY, M., KAPHINGST, K.M., ROBINSON-O'BRIEN, R. & GLANZ, K. TOWNSEND, R.F. 2015. Ending poverty and hunger by 2030: An agen-
2008. Creating healthy food and eating environments: Policy and en- da for the global food system. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
vironmental approaches. Annual Reviews of Public Health, 21, 253-72.
TRIEU, K., NEAL, B., HAWKES, C., DUNFORD, E., CAMPBELL, N.,
STUCKLER, D., MCKEE, M., EBRAHIM, S. & BASU S. 2012. Man- RODRIGUEZ-FERNANDEZ, R., LEGETIC, B., MCLAREN, L., BARBERIO,
ufacturing epidemics: The role of global producers in increased A. & WEBSTER, J. 2015. Salt reduction initiatives around the world: A
consumption of unhealthy commodities including processed foods, systematic review of progress towards the global target. PLOS ONE,
alcohol and tobacco. PLoS Med, 9, e1001235, doi:10.1371/journal. 10, e0130247.
pmed.1001235.
TSCHIRELY, D., REARDON, T., DOLISLAGER, M. & SNYDER, S. 2015.
SWANSON, B. 2008. Global Review of Good Agricultural Extension and The rise of a middle class in East and Southern Africa: Implications
Advisory Service Practices. Rome, Italy: FAO. for food system transformation. Journal of International Development,
27, 628-646.doi:10.1002/jid.3107.
SWINBURN, B., EGGER, G. & RAZA, F. 1999. Dissecting obesogenic
environments: The development and application of a framework for UN DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, POPULA-
identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. TION DIVISION (UN DESA). 2014. World urbanization prospects: The
Preventive Medicine, 29, 563-70. 2014 revision. Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352).
SWINBURN, B.A., SACKS, G., HALL, K.D., MCPHERSON, K., FINE- UN DESA. 2015. World population prospects: The 2015 revision, key
GOOD, D.T., MOODIE, M.L. & GORTMAKER, S.L. 2011. The global findings and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241.
obesity pandemic: Shaped by global drivers and local environments.
The Lancet, 378, 804-14. UNITED NATIONS STANDING COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION
(UNSCN). 2015. Enhancing Coherence between Trade Policy and
TAYLOR, A.L. & JACOBSON, M.F. 2016. Carbonating the world: The Nutrition Action. Implementing the Framework for Action of the
marketing and health impact of sugar drinks in low- and middle-in- Second International Conference on Nutrition. Discussion Paper 1.
come countries. Center for Science in the Public Interest. Washington, Geneva: UNSCN.
DC: CSPI.
UNITED NATIONS. 2015. Zero Hunger Challenge. Pathways to zero
THE ECONOMIST. 2015. Global population forecasts. Accessed hunger: Transforming our Food Systems to Transform our World.
22 April 2016. http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicde- Rome: Committee on World Food Security. Accessed 25 May 2016,
tail/2015/08/daily-chart-growth-areas. http://www.un.org/en/zerohunger/pdfs/ZHC%20-%20Pathways%20
to%20Zero%20Hunger.pdf.
THE INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVEL-
OPMENT & THE WORLD BANK. 2007. From agriculture to nutrition: UNITED NATIONS. 2016a. Taking the Paris Agreement forward: Tasks
Pathways, synergies and outcomes. Washington, D.C. World Bank. arising from decision 1/CP.21. Accessed 26 May 2016. http://unfccc.
int/files/bodies/cop/application/pdf/overview_1cp21_tasks_.pdf.
THIRTLE, C., LIN, L. & PIESSE, J. 2003. The impact of research-led
agricultural productivity growth on poverty reduction in Africa, Asia UNITED NATIONS. 2016b. World economic situation prospects. New
and Latin America. World Development, 31, 1959-1975. York: United Nations.
THOW, A.M., ANNAN, R., MENSAH, L. & CHOWDHURY, S.N. 2014. UNNEVEHR, L. & GRACE, D eds. 2013. Aflatoxins: Finding solutions for
Development, implementation and outcome of standards to restrict improved food safety. 2020 Vision Focus 20. Washington, D.C.: IFPRI.
fatty meat in the food supply and prevent NCDs: Learning from an
innovative trade/food policy in Ghana. BMC Public Health Journal, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES & USDA
14, doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-249. (U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE). 2015. 2015–2020 Dietary
guidelines for Americans. 8th edn. Accessed 25 March 2016, http://
THOW, A.M. & HAWKES, C. 2009. The implications of trade liberali- health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/.
zation for diet and health: a case study from Central America. Global
Health, 5, doi:10.1186/1744-8603-5-5. USDA (UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE) ECO-
NOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE. 2016. International macroeconomic
TILMAN, D. & CLARK, M. 2014. Global diets link environmental data set. Accessed 20 April 2016, http://www.ers.usda.gov/da-
sustainability and human health. Nature, 515, 518-22, doi: 10.1038/ ta-products/international-macroeconomic-data-set.aspx.
nature13959.
VANDEVIJVERE, S. & SWINBURN, B. 2015. Pilot test of the healthy
TOM, M.S., FISCHBECK, P.S. & HENDRICKSON, C.T. 2015. Energy food environment policy index (Food-EPI) to increase government
use, blue water footprint and greenhouse gas emissions for current actions for creating healthy food environments. British Medical Jour-
food consumption patterns and dietary recommendations in the US. nal Open, 5:e006194.
Environment Systems and Decisions, 36, 92-103.
126 References
VANDEVIJVERE, S., MONTEIRO, C., KREBS-SMITH, S.M., LEE, A., WHEELER, T. & VON BRAUN, J. 2013. Climate change impacts on
SWINBURN, B., KELLY, B., NEAL, B., SNOWDON, W., SACKS, G. & global food security. Science, 341, 508-13.
INFORMAS (International Network for Food and Obesity). 2013.
Monitoring and benchmarking population diet quality globally: A WHITING, D.R., GUARIGUATA, L., WEIL, C. & SHAW, J. 2011. IDF di-
step-wise approach. Obesity Reviews, 14 Suppl 1, 135-49, doi: 10.1111/ abetes atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011
obr.12082. and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 94, 311-21.
VANHAM, D., MEKONNEN, M.M. & HOEKSTRA, A.Y. 2013. The WHITMEE, S., HAINES, A., BEYRER, C., BOLTZ, F., CAPON, A.G., DE
water footprint of the EU for different diets. Ecological indicators, 32, SOUZA DIAS, B.F., EZEH, A., FRUMKIN, H., GONG, P., HEAD, P., et al.
1-8. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.020. 2015. Safeguarding human health in the anthropocene epoch: Re-
port of The Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary
VILLORIA, N.B., GOLUB, A., BYERLEE, D. & STEVENSON, J. 2013. Will health. Lancet, 386, 1973-2028.
yield improvements on the forest frontier reduce greenhouse gas
emissions? A global analysis of oil palm. American Journal of Agricul- WHO, UNICEF (CHILDREN’S RIGHT and EMERGENCY RELIEF
tural Economics, 95, 1301-1308. ORGANIZATION), USAID, AED (ACADEMY FOR EDUCATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT), UC DAVIS (UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS)
VON BRAUN J. & KENNEDY E. 1994. Agricultural Commercialization, and IFPRI. 2010. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding
Economic Development and Nutrition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins practices. Part 3 Country Profiles. Geneva: WHO.
University Press.
WHO. 2010. NLIS (Nutrition Landscape Nutrition Information Sys-
VON BRAUN, J. & TADESSE, G. 2012. Global food price volatility and tem) Country profile indicators interpretation guide. Geneva: WHO.
spikes: An overview of costs, causes and solutions. ZEF-Discussion
Papers on Development Policy, Bonn. WHO. 2014. World report on ageing and health. Geneva: WHO.
WARREN, E., HAWKESWORTH, S. & KNAI, C. 2015. Investigating the WHO. 2015a. Healthy diets. Fact Sheet 394. Accessed 20 February
association between urban agriculture and food security, dietary 2016, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs394/en/
diversity and nutritional status: A systematic literature review. Food
Policy, 31, 54-66, doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.03.004. WHO. 2015b. WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne
diseases: Foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group
WCRF (WORLD CANCER RESEARCH FUND). 2016a. Set retail envi- 2007–2015. Geneva: WHO.
ronment incentives. Set incentives and rules to create a healthy retail
and food service environment. Accessed 20 June 2016, http://www. WIGGINS, S. & KEATS, S. 2015. The Rising Cost of a Healthy Diet:
wcrf.org/int/policy/nourishing-framework/set-retail-environment-in- Changing Relative Prices of Foods In High-Income and Emerging Econo-
centives. mies. London, UK: ODI.
WCRF. 2016b. NOURISHING framework – Our policy framework to WINA (WORLD INSTANT NOODLES ASSOCIATION) 2016. The
promote healthy diets and reduce obesity. Accessed 5 April 2016, manufacturing process of instant noodles. Accessed 20 June 2016,
http://www.wcrf.org/int/policy/nourishing-framework. http://instantnoodles.org/en/noodles/process.html.
WEI, A. & CACHO, J. 2001. Competition among foreign and Chinese ZHU, J., ZHANG, Y., XUE, H., WANG, L., WANG, Y. & WANG, Y. 2016.
agro-food enterprises in the process of globalization. International Trends in obesity and non-communicable chronic diseases in China
Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2, 437-451. and projected future situation for 2030. The Official Journal of the
Federation of America Societies for Experimental Biology, 30, lb421.
Appendices
APPENDIX 1: TABLE 1.1: Recent reports on food systems: Aims and key messages
Product category Aim Key messages
Bioversity International. 2012. To develop metrics to define the sustainability Food system sustainability involves measuring: nutrition
Metrics of Sustainable Diets of a food system adequacy, environmental sustainability, cultural acceptability,
and Food Systems, 2012286 low cost-accessibility
FAO. 2013. The State of Food To provide an overview of how food systems Consumers ultimately determine what they eat and therefore
and Agriculture: Food Systems must be used to ensure better nutrition what food systems produce. Within a multisectoral approach,
for Better Nutrition287 food systems offer many opportunities for interventions to
improve nutrition, including better governance
Global Panel. 2014. “How can To identify policy actions that support Governments must move away from policy that is focused
agriculture and food system nutrition-enhancing food systems as a whole on just one or another part of the system at a time. Policies
policies improve nutrition?”288 should focus on agricultural production, markets and trade,
purchasing power, food transformation and consumer
demand
ILSI. 2014. Assessing To generate metrics of the influence of the Food systems impact on nutrition from production to
Sustainable Nutrition food system on sustainable nutrition security retailing, to consumption and waste disposal. Metrics are
Security: Role of Food available to model these
Systems, 2014289
FAO. 2014. High Level Panel To analyze existing evidence about the causes (1) Improve data collection and knowledge sharing on food
of Experts. Food Losses and of food losses and waste (FLW) and suggests loss and waste (FLW); (2) Develop effective strategies to
Waste in the Context of action to reduce them reduce FLW, at the appropriate levels; (3) Take effective steps
Sustainable Food Systems290 to reduce FLW – at micro, meso and macro (systemic) levels;
(4) Improve coordination of policies and strategies in order to
reduce FLW
US National Research Council. US focus (1) facilitate understanding of Develop a framework for assessing the health, environmental
2015: Committee on a environmental, health, social and economic and socio-economic effects of the US food system.
Framework for Assessing the effects of food systems, (2) encourage
Health, Environmental and improved data collection systems and Most studies evaluating food system strategies are too
Social Effects of the Food methodologies to identify and measure narrow and do not look at multiple dimensions – using a
System291 effects; (3) inform decisions in food/ comprehensive framework to assess food systems uncovers
agricultural practices and policies to minimize hidden advantages/disadvantages
unintended health, environmental, social and
economic consequences
Chicago Council. 2015. To identify what the US government can do to Stronger policies, more research, training for the next
“Healthy Food for a Healthy make nutrition-sensitive policy interventions generation of leaders, public private partnerships needed for
World”292 across the food system value chain nutrition-sensitive food systems
International Panel of Experts To make the case for producing a joined-up A comprehensive definition of sustainability which should be
on Sustainable Food Systems. picture of food systems and their political used an end goal of food systems
2015. The New Science of economy, in ways that reach across the
Sustainable Food Systems: scientific disciplines and reach beyond
Overcoming Barriers to Food traditional bounds of the scientific community
Systems Reform293
World Bank. 2015. Ending What are the key actions in food systems that Three areas with greatest impact: 1) climate-smart agriculture;
poverty and hunger by 2030: must be taken to end widespread hunger? 2) improving nutrition (agriculture needs to become more
an agenda for the global food nutrition-sensitive); and 3) strengthening value across food
system294 chains and improving market access
286
Fanzo, Cogill and Mattei (2012) FAO (2013) 288Global Panel (2014) 289Acharya et al. (2014)
287
HLPE (2014)
290 291
IOM and NRC (2015)
292
Bereuter and Glickman (2015) IPES-Food (2015) 294Townsend (2015)
293
128 Appendices
APPENDIX 1: TABLE 1.1 (continued): Recent reports on food systems: Aims and key messages
IFPRI. 2016. Global Food How can food systems (support for Support for smallholders: invest in agricultural R&D, efficient
Policy Report295 smallholder farmers) best contribute to and inclusive value chains, increased equality of access to
meeting UN Sustainable Development Goals? and control of land, increase women’s access to inputs, better
water and irrigation management, climate smart agriculture
and climate finance
WWF Netherlands report. To explore if the world can achieve a food The world needs to address four main challenges
2016. The Global Food system that works within the planet’s simultaneously in order to transition to a sustainable and
System: an Analysis296 biophysical boundaries, inclusively supports resilient food system: creating an adaptive and resilient food
human livelihoods, and ensures food security system; making nutritious food available to all; working within
for a growing and changing population? planetary boundaries; while supporting livelihoods and well-
being
APPENDIX 2: TABLE 3.1: Initiatives to improve food consumption quality and availability
Food consumption
Host organizations Number of countries Type of data Level of aggregation
measurement initiative
Global Dietary Database Tufts University 113 approximately Population and National and some
http://www. individual-based dietary subnational
globaldietarydatabase.org/ surveys
the-global-dietary-database-
measuring-diet-worldwide.
html
Global Individual Database FAO and WHO Not clear Individual food intake National and some
on Food Intake (GIFT) subnational
(under development)
Voices of the Hungry. The FAO and Gallup 150 approximately Experiential estimates National and some
Food Insecurity Experience of food insecurity. Self- subnational
Scale reported data collected
at the individual level.
Comprehensive European European Food Safety 22 European Member Individual-based dietary National and some
Food Consumption Database Authority States surveys subnational
http://www.efsa.europa.
eu/en/food-consumption/
comprehensive-database
Global Consumption World Bank 90 approximately Food expenditure for National and some
Database 35 food and beverage subnational
http://datatopics.worldbank. categories from
org/consumption/ household surveys
AboutDatabase
Passport Nutrition http:// Euromonitor 54 countries Retail sales of foods National

www.euromonitor.com/
passport-nutrition
IFPRI (2016)
295 296
Gladek et al. (2016)
APPENDIX 3: TABLE 3.2: ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ categories used by Imamura et al. (2015)
and what they mean
Diet component Why ‘healthy’/’unhealthy’
‘Healthy’
Fruits (100 g/serving) Coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke,
oesophageal cancer, lung cancer
Vegetables, including legumes (100 g/serving) CHD, stroke, oesophageal cancer
Nuts/seeds (1 oz (28.35 g)/serving) CHD, diabetes
Wholegrains (50 g/serving) CHD, diabetes
Seafood (100 g/serving) CHD, stroke
'Unhealthy'
Red meat, unprocessed (100 g/serving) diabetes, colorectal cancer
Processed meat (50 g/serving) CHD, diabetes, colorectal cancer
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on Micha et al. (2015), Table 2
130 Appendices
APPENDIX 4: TABLE 3.3: Definitions of categories of processed foods, non-alcoholic beverages and ultra-processed
foods in Chapter 3
Product category Description Included as
ultra-processed
(1) Total processed foods Aggregation of all processed food categories
Baked goods Bread, pastries and cakes ✓*

Biscuits and snack bars Sweet biscuits, savoury biscuits and crackers and bread substitutes, granola/ ✓
muesli bars, breakfast bars, energy and nutrition bars, fruit bars
Breakfast cereals Ready-to-eat and hot cereals ✓
Cheese Processed and unprocessed cheese* ✓*
Confectionery Chocolate confectionery, chewing gum and bubble gum, and sugar ✓
confectionery
Dried processed food Dessert mixes, dried ready meals, dehydrated soup, instant soup, dried pasta, ✓
plain noodles, instant noodles and rice products
Milk products Fresh/pasteurized, long-life, goat, flavoured milk drinks, soya beverages, milk
powder
Ice cream and frozen desserts Impulse ice cream, take-home ice cream, frozen yoghurt, artisanal ice cream and ✓
other frozen desserts
Oils and fats Vegetable/seed oil, cooking fats, butter, margarine, spreadable oils/fats
Processed fruits and vegetables Shelf stable fruits and vegetables and frozen fruits and vegetables
Processed meat and seafood Processed meat, processed seafood and meat substitutes ✓*
Ready meals This is the aggregation of canned/preserved, frozen, dried, chilled ready meals, ✓
dinner mixes, frozen pizza, chilled pizza and prepared salads.
Sauces, dressings and condiments Tomato pastes/purees, bouillon/stock, herbs/spices, monosodium glutamate ✓
(MSG), table sauces, soya-based sauces, pasta sauces, wet/cooking sauces,
dry sauces/powder mixes, ketchup, mayonnaise, mustard, salad dressings,
vinaigrettes, dips, pickled products
Soup Canned/preserved, dehydrated, instant, chilled, UHT and frozen soup ✓
Spreads Jams and preserves, honey, chocolate spreads, nut based spreads, and yeast ✓
based spreads
Sweet and savoury snacks Fruit snacks, chips/crisps, extruded snacks, corn chips, popcorn, ✓
pretzels, nuts
Yoghurt and sour milk products Yoghurt and sour milk drinks ✓*
(2) Total non-alcoholic beverages Aggregation of all non-alcoholic beverage categories
Bottled water Still bottled water, carbonated bottled water, flavoured bottled water and
functional bottled water
Carbonated soft drinks Non-alcoholic drinks containing dissolved carbon dioxide, regular ✓
& low calorie
Concentrates Liquid concentrates and powder concentrates ✓
Ready-to-drink coffee & tea Packaged ready-to-drink (RTD) coffee and tea, excluding coffee flavoured milk ✓
drinks
Fruit/vegetable juice 100% juice, nectars (25-99% juice), juice drinks (< 24% juice), flavoured drinks ✓
Sports & energy drinks Sports and energy drinks ✓
Note: The categories included as ‘ultra-processed’ are consistent with the PAHO (2015) NOVA food classification system, however, due to the unavailability of more
disaggregated data the categories marked with a ‘*’ aggregate several processed and ultra-processed categories and are subsequently over-represented in the total
ultra-processed categorization.
APPENDIX 5: TABLE 6.1: The world’s top 25 food and non-alcoholic beverage companies (2003, 2010 and 2015)
Company Main product line Food sales (million USD) Rank
2003 2010 2015 2003 2010 2015
Nestlé S.A. Diversified 61,615 91,560 72,245 1 1 1
PepsiCo Inc. Beverages and snack foods 26,971 43,232 66,683 6 2 2
JBS Meat – 12,745 52,580 – 13 3
The Coca-Cola Company Beverages 21,044 30,990 45,998 8 6 4
Archer Daniels Midland Co. Ingredients, grain-based 36,151 32,241 43,232 2 5 5
products
Tyson Foods Meat and poultry 24,549 26,704 37,580 7 9 6
Kraft Foods Inc./Mondelez Int. Diversified 31,010 40,386 34,244 3 3 7
(2015)
Cargill Inc. Grain-based foods 27,260 26,500 33,700 5 10 8
Mars Inc. Confectionery 17,000 30,000 33,000 9 7 9
Unilever plc Diversified 29,938 29,180 29,070 4 8 10
Danone Dairy, biscuits, water 14,850 20,810 28,545 10 11 11
H. J. Heinz Co./Kraft Heinz (2015) Frozen and shelf-stable foods 8,415 10,155 28,000 18 24 12
Lactalis Dairy 6,051 11,805 22,240 31 18 13
Fonterra Cooperative Group Dairy 6,575 10,025 18,565 25 26 14
General Mills Inc. Grain-based foods 11,070 14,691 17,910 12 12 15
ConAgra Inc. Diversified 14,522 12,731 17,703 11 14 16
Royal FrieslandCampina Dairy 4,866 11,335 15,320 34 19 17
Kellogg Co. Grain-based foods 8,812 12,575 14,580 17 16 18

CHS Cooperatives Grain-based foods 4,177 6,550 14,500 41 44 19
Grupo Bimbo S.A. de C.V. Baked goods 3,530 8,628 14,390 52 33 20
Arla Foods Group Dairy 6,068 9,710 14,330 30 28 21
Smithfield Foods Inc. Processed meats 8,248 12,488 13,221 19 17 22
BRF Brasil Foods Frozen foods – 8,093 13,185 – 35 23
NH Foods Ltd. Meat, processed foods, dairy, – – 12,108 – – 24
marine products
Ferrero Confectionery – 8,900 11,355 – 31 25
Source: Compiled by the authors, based on Food Engineering (2016)
Note: Alcoholic beverage companies have been removed.
132 Appendices
Apart from where credited on the photo, all photos
supplied by istockphoto.com/thinkstockphotos.co.uk
T +44 20 3073 8325
E secretariat@glopan.org
W glopan.org
@Glo_PAN
ISBN:978-0-9956228-0-7
September 2016
Download the full report

and executive summary here:
www.glopan.org/foresight
Jointly funded by
This report is based on research funded in part by the UK Government and the
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The findings and conclusions contained within are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the funders
View publication stats

ForesightReport PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ForesightReport PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ForesightReport PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

Food systems and diet quality (contributor)

Chapter · September 2016

Million Death Study View project

Sustainable and healthy diets View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Rhoda Peace Tumusiime, Srinath Reddy, President, Emmy Simmons, Board

John Kufuor Sir John Beddington

Project Lead Expert Group Reviewers of commissioned evidence papers

The world is facing a nutrition crisis: approximately three billion

FAO, IFAD and WFP (2015a)

Source: Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators (2015), Figure 5

Box 2: Long-term drivers of the nutrition crisis

In economic terms across Africa and Asia, the estimated impact

However, the long path that high-income countries have taken

• Many countries are experiencing a “double burden” of both

of undernutrition represent losses of gross domestic product

FIGURE 1.1: Different forms of malnutrition

Child stunting Child wasting Child overweight Adult overweight

Source: 2016 Global Nutrition Report (IFPRI, 2016a)

Source: Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators (2015), Figure 5

In Nigeria, the number of adults In Ethiopia, the corresponding

Under-five stunting Adult overweight

Source: 2016 Global Nutrition Report, Table A1.1 (IFPRI, 2016a)

Low-quality diets contribute to three very troubling nutrition trends.

1.2 The role of food systems

Drivers of food systems

Source: Compiled by the authors

Black et al. (2013)

Chapter 8 calls for change in how we think about food systems

Low- and middle-income

The second aim is to help decision makers identify and

• Diet quality indicators for groups vulnerable to undernutrition,

(WHO) guidance for a healthy diet and knowledge of unsafe food,

• These recommendations stress the importance of eating a diverse

• More countries need up-to-date, food-based dietary guidelines to

• So that high-quality diets can be delivered to people in the future,

2.1 Defining a high-quality diet

FAO, WHO and UNU (2001)

32 Chapter 2: What is a high-quality diet?

Starchy staples; dark green leafy vegs (GLV);

Only two out of 31 low-income countries and 12 out of 51 low

The second approach to defining high-quality diets has been

34 Chapter 2: What is a high-quality diet?

FIGURE 2.1: What 83 national food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) recommend

Do they explicitly recommend eating a varied diet?

Do they recommend to reduce sugar consumption?

Do they recommend to reduce salt consumption?

Do they recommend to reduce fat consumption

Do they recommend to eat more fruits and vegetables?

Do they recommend to reduce or moderate

Do they mention milk?

Do they mention fish?

Do they mention eggs?

Do they mention legumes?

Do they address food safety or hygiene?

Do they recommend to drink water?

Do they recommend to reduce or moderate

Do they make an explicit reference

• Many countries are experiencing a “double burden” of both

• Diet quality indicators for groups vulnerable to undernutrition,

• These recommendations stress the importance of eating a diverse

• More countries need up-to-date, food-based dietary guidelines to

• So that high-quality diets can be delivered to people in the future,

• Huge numbers of people worldwide have diets that are deficient

• Many infants are not breastfed despite WHO guidance.

• In low- and middle-income countries, more than half of adolescent

• Over time, people are consuming more recommended components

• Sales of ultra-processed food and sugar-sweetened beverages are

• Income growth does not guarantee healthier diets. Countries

• The lack of data on what people actually consume around the

ver half of adolescent

In 2000, sales of ultra-processed foods and beverages in the