Brexit (Student's Name) (Institute Name)
Brexit (Student's Name) (Institute Name)
Brexit (Student's Name) (Institute Name)
[Student’s Name]
[Institute Name]
The United Kingdom formally left European Union on 31 Jan 2020 but this process started
decades ago. The term Brexit is used to define the withdrawal of United Kingdom from EU.
David Cameron who was the serving prime minister from conservative party announced to hold
country voted to leave and the remaining ones decided to stay which led the Prime Minister to
resign from his seat[ CITATION Men16 \l 1033 ]. As we dig deeper there are many reasons why
UK decided to split from EU. One of the major reasons were economics, sovereignty. The EU
failed to address the financial problem of UK in 2008 which caused an uproar in the society.
Secondly, EU started to threat the sovereignty of UK by imposing its rules and regulations on
various sectors such as agriculture, competition policy, copyright and patent laws. UK may have
able to split from EU through Brexit but all this have come at a great cost. Brexit has left
profound effects on the economic growth of UK which will make country unstable. The
economist suggest that growth of UK will suffer greatly for the next decade or so. The British
pound was harshly affected by the Brexit when it fell below the moderate level. Moreover,
Investors showed fear while investing in UK stock markets. As a result FTSE 100, FTSE 250,
and other markets crashed due to the Brexit deal. The agreement could not only create
tremendous problems for British citizens but it could also isolate them from the rest of European
The Brexit may have given UK a way to split themselves from EU but it will have a long lasting
effect on them and the whole world as well. According to El-Erian (2018) Brexit won’t affect
only the UK, it has lessons for the global economy. UK is going to suffer a lot in terms of
growth, trade, jobs and internal relations. The exit from EU would mean UK will stop getting
support from EU members which would further destabilize the country. This will impact the
growth of the country, increase poverty resulting in higher debts. According Evans & Menon
(2017), it stated that Brexit would raise inflation, export prices, and imports in UK which will
lower the living standards of people. Developed countries have improved standards of living
which reflects the well-being or happiness of people. Since Brexit, the average wage of an
individual had fallen tremendously. This agreement will create a massive loophole in the job
sector which can cause unemployment. Brexit not only affected UK but it also had an
international impact. According to a report of Overseas Development Institute, Brexit will leave
severe problems for developing countries as well. According to a UN report, “least developing
countries such as Tanzania, Bangladesh, Zambia, and Uganda will get affected as a result of
majority of their goods is transported to UK and other European regions. The negative impact of
Brexit is going to affect these countries in terms of its prices and exports. The estimates revealed
that these countries could lose upto $500 million in terms of export as a result of Brexit. Not only
this, Brexit would also affect the members of European Union. Brexit may have reignited the
relation between UK and Ireland over the borders which was a major issue back in 19 th century.
UK may have been criticized for opting Brexit but on the other hand some claimed it as a
success. According to John Longworth, “stop complaining about Brexit, the economic benefit
will be huge”. Moreover, he also says, “Brexit will be a success story, but for now our leaders
have lost the plot”. The exit from EU will give UK complete authority over its borders, the
government will be able to raise the living standards by allocating resources properly.
Government would need to implement new policies to tackle with challenges that have ascended
due to Brexit.
There were discussions of DCFTA that is deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area signed
between the countries of Morocco and EU however, as UK sidelined them from EU they have
continued their agreement with Morocco. They agreement is named as ‘Association Agreement’.
The trade agreements reach up to £2.5 billion in 2018 making Morocco 7th destination from UK
exports. This was a strategic relationship among both the counties linking them securing their
judicial, political, territorial and economic benefits which were previously mentioned in EU-
Morocco relationship. This agreement ensures free trade of British and Moroccan products in
each other’s market. This deal is effective since the time of UK leaving EU. Some of the top
exports to UK are vehicles, oils, mineral fuels, electrical machinery and so on. On the other hand
there are benefits for British consumers and businesses as well[ CITATION Dhi161 \l 1033 ].
The trade advantages such as tariff free trade of industrial products combined with liberalization
of trade in fishery products, agricultural and agri-food. On the macro level economic resources
such as labor, capital and land can be increased that also helps in obtaining natural resources for
the other country. On the micro-level for both the countries it is their citizens that are getting the
long term benefits. The citizens can get different products in less prices because of free trade
access and in return to that they can utilize this money in improving their quality of life. Similar
case can be applied by using theory of comparative advantage that explains both the countries
are having ample resource however, the country that is having more opportunity cost produces a
product and exports it. Above mentioned imports and exports are few examples of what Morocco
and UK should be focusing on in long term. The comparative advantage of UK is their oil and
gas reserves that can be exported on the other hand Morocco is having the comparative
advantage of agricultural products, they are one of the largest exporters of agriculture.
UK is considered as market oriented and highly developed economy around the world with sixth
largest national economy that is measured according to nominal GDP. Looking into the UK
Moroccan economic trade deal not only both the countries are having improved foreign
relationships and they will also have certainty in their businesses in near future. Morocco is
becoming one of the popular country which is having trade deals with many European and
Middle Eastern countries. There agriculture is supporting the world economy and similar to that
UK is exporting electrical machinery that is also beneficial for the world economy because of
having good quality products involved. The service sector of UK is also contributing to the
economy of country where they give 80% to the GDP of the country. The financial services
industry is particularly important, and London is the second-largest financial center in the world.
The country is also having strong trade relations with United States of America that contributes
Before exploring UK’s foreign direct investment and its trade links with other countries it is
important to examine this on the basis of OLI framework. OLI present governor for ownership,
location and Internalization. The country like UK they are fitting on all the defined criteria of
OLI Framework. FDI increases the national productivity and output of the country. Because of
Brexit there will be significant impact on foreign direct investment. Not only the local firms but
multinational companies will also be having the influence of Brexit. UK currently has FDI stock
that is over 1 trillion, 50 percent of it is from members of European Union. The study of
Colantone & Stanig (2018) find that multinational increases their productivity in UK with the
help of management practices and Technology. On the contrary the study of Sampson (2017)
suggested that there is availability of foreign investment for UK owned firms that are belonging
to same industry. Countries like UK which are already having a developed financial sector, has
large impact of FDI on their GDP growth. Even In the case of UK not performing well after
Brexit the study of Dhingra, et al. (2016) so that they are having enough reserves to support their
real income. Earlier research of Fetzer (2019) show that during the membership of EU UK was
having 2.25% GDP through there FDI. UK has cars as their successful manufacturing option.
They have fourth largest market of car manufacturing that is available for sales in EU and other
markets. There strong reliance on cards as their top export priority in help in increasing the
country's FDI. There are many researchers predicted negative impact of Brexit on country's FDI.
Because of tariff barriers there are high chances of trade costs rising, because of the production
location did UK is having. It is costly compared to other countries which are in Europe. Financial
services have the largest stock of inward FDI in the UK (45%) and constitute 8% of GDP and
12% of tax receipts. Theory of Internalization can also be applied in this context where
One of the most relevant theory in this case is Theory of Mercantilism. This theory explains that
wealth of nations depends upon having less imports and higher exports[ CITATION DeF16 \l
1033 ]. The government creates conditions such as imposing subsidies to encourage the exports
of the country, the conditions of UK are having the similar conditions where exports are
encouraged and because of which the y are having higher exports. Exports are regarded by the
country as their potential gold that is managed by the policies designed by the country. UK even
imposed higher tariffs on imported products so that locally designed products should be
encouraged and bought. Another application of theory is of Absolute Advantage. This theory
focuses that country produces the product which they think they are efficient to
produce[ CITATION Dav20 \l 1033 ]. The only factor of production in this theory is labor.
Similar to the case of UK they are having many exports however, there major export is car
manufacturing within which they are having competitive advantage compared to other countries.
Cars are the cash cows for UK as they can immediately be exported to many other nations and
can have profitable results. In the case of Morocco they have focus on agricultural products they
should be focusing on that and exporting it instead of moving towards any electronic product
because their efficiency can be compromised and the ultimate results cannot be beneficial for the
country. These economic theories will help UK in analyzing their strengths from the trade point
of view and they can excel within the product that they are having grip over.
Further discussing the above mentioned theories it is important to explore automotive industry of
UK. There are some of the premium brands such as Rolls-Royce, Jaguar, Aston Martin, Land
Rover, McLaren and so on. The industry alone had a turnover of £82 billion that has generated
higher number of value for the economy of UK. After Brexit it is expected that automotive
industry would flourish more because of having less ties with Germany that has higher number
of automotive industry sectors. Another industry is UK’s oil and gas sector that has higher results
of productivity in future times. Currently UK signing deals with Morocco and many other
countries have agreed to export oil and gas. UK produces an estimate of 1.42 million of barrel of
oil per day. Because of having good grip on financial sector UK is playing leading role in energy
trading sector and there are many businesses with which UK is in collaboration. They are
exporting their oil across Europe. The exports of oil related services and products by UK is
estimated at more than 0 billion a year in value. This shows how well managed the supply chain
of UK is on global platforms. The use of technology and competence of its people can also be
evaluated with this perspective. Another industry that is impacted by the step of Brexit is dental
industry. There are processes and recognition of qualification that has to be revised for dental
care professional which can be difficult procedure. The medicines as well as export and import
of different material and dental equipment can be difficult because most of the dental equipment
were obtained from France and Germany. Health and safety legislations should be revised with
the data protection regulations. The research and development of the business also should be
The studies of Danciu (2011) has shown a great impact of cultural factors on international trade.
For instance, the language of both the countries is different. UK has their national language as
English whereas Morocco’s national language is Arabic. However, in this case universally
accepted business language English is focused. Both the countries are having different cultures
however, it is not reflected in their trade agreement. With the practice of globalization and
improved technology countries as coming closer for the trade that is having dual benefits. This
refers to social perspective that is added in uncontrollable factor and has higher chances of
creating differences. The negotiations with countries can be done after influenced by their
culture. The study of Kania (2010) describes the similar concept that factors of culture are
important in international commerce because of values, language and lifestyle that is different
from one environment to other. The agricultural products exported by Morocco are used in UK
however, there are many vegetables products such as spices which are not common in UK and
because of cultural differences these are grown in Morocco but not exported to UK. Another
major factor of cultural implication is the language barrier which the locals are having. These
people are not educated and because of which they are not familiarize with English. Bribery has
been a culture in Morocco that can have an impact on the trading among both the countries. This
creates a negative impact and because of which Morocco has to take come concrete steps
through which they can ensure more productivity with no bribery and all of the expenses the
country is having from this trade deal and business should be invested in the prosperity of
country.
References
Bawa, M., 2017. Employee Motivation and Productivity: A Review of Literature and
Colantone, I. & Stanig, P., 2018. Global competition and Brexit. American political science
Danciu, V., 2011. International Business Negotiation Under The Impact of Cultural Distance.
Davis, D. & Dingel, J., 2020. The comparative advantage of cities. Journal of International
Economics, p. 103291.
De Feis, G., Grunewald, D. & De Feis, G., 2016. International Trade Theory of Hyper-
Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T. & Reenen, J., 2016. The consequences of Brexit for UK
Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T. & Van Reenen, J., 2016. The impact of Brexit on
Evans, G. & Menon, A., 2017. Brexit and British politics. s.l.:John Wiley & Sons.
Fetzer, T., 2019. Did austerity cause Brexit?. American Economic Review, 109(11), pp. 3849-86.
Ford, R. & Goodwin, M., 2017. Britain after Brexit: A nation divided. Journal of Democracy,
Kania, 2010. The Role of Cultural Differences in Forming a Business Strategy. Journal of
Menon, A. & Salter, J., 2016. Brexit: initial reflections. International Affairs, 92(6), pp. 1297-
1318.
Sampson, T., 2017. Brexit: the economics of international disintegration. Journal of Economic
Strange, R. & Humphrey, J., 2019. What lies between market and hierarchy? Insights from
internalization theory and global value chain theory. Journal of International Business Studies,
Wang, Y. et al., 2011. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA