Bartok in His Own Music
Bartok in His Own Music
Bartok in His Own Music
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of California Press and American Musicological Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Journal of the American Musicological Society.
http://www.jstor.org
WHEN EXAMINING Bela Bart6k's remarks about music, one should re-
member two things: his remarks about the folk music of Eastern
Europe2 were the product of tens of thousands of hours of scholarly
research and systematic analysis, but his remarks about his own music
(although they deal with specific technical features and are supported
by numerous examples) are basically the informal thinking of a com-
poser rather than the systematic analysis of a scholar. It should be pointed
out that Bartok was often reluctant to express his feelings about art
music and that he refused many attractive offers to teach composition.
We can expect, therefore, that when he writes about his own music, he
will not be as comprehensive as he is when he writes about folk music,
and we can expect that he will dwell on those aspects of his style that are
most closely related to the folk music he has already analyzed.3 These
tendencies can be seen in two passages from a lecture that Bart6k pre-
pared in 1942-43:
I never created new theories in advance; I hated such ideas. I had, of
course, a very definite feeling [about] certain directions [I wanted] to take,
but at the time of the work I did not care about what designationswould ap-
ply to those directions, what sources they came from. This doesn't mean . . .
composing without . . . plans and without sufficient control. The plans were
concerned with the spirit of the new work and with technical problems-
for instance, formal structure [as required] by the spirit of the work-all this
more or less instinctively felt; but I was never concerned with general theories
to be applied to the works I was going to write. Now that the greatest part of
my work has already been written, there appear certain general tendencies,
general formulaefrom which to deduce theories. But even now I would prefer
to try new ways and meansinsteadof deducingtheories.
Source 7 (1942-43), p. 594
SOURCES
I. "The Relation of Folk-Song to the Development of the Art Music of Our
Time," The Sackbut (June, 1921), pp. 5-II. Parts of this article were pub-
lished originally in "Der Einflussder Volksmusikauf die heutige Kunstmusik,"
Melos (October, 1920), pp. 384-386; however, the passages quoted in the
presentarticle appearedonly in the English version.
2. "The Folk Songs of Hungary," Pro Musica (October, 1928), pp. 28-35.
3. "The Peasant Music of Hungary," The Musical Courier (September 12,
1931), pp. 6 & 22.
4. "HungarianPeasant Music," The AMusicalQuarterly XIX (I933), pp. 267-
287.
5. "RumanianFolk Music" (3 volumes, unpublished,which were completed
in I943). The manuscriptof this work is deposited at ColumbiaUniversity. It
has been edited by BenjaminSuchoff and will be published in I966 under the
auspicesof the Bela Bart6kArchives,New York.
6. "SomeProblems of Folk Music Researchin East Europe" (unpublishedlec-
ture preparedin 1941;the typescript is at the Bela BartokArchives, New York).
7. ["The New HungarianArt Music"] (unpublishedlecture notes preparedin
I942-43; Bart6k's hand-written draft is at the Bela Bart6k Archives, New
York).
8. "Foreword"to "Bela Bartok: Masterpieces for the Piano" (unpublished).
This foreword was written in 1945when Bartok assembledan anthology of his
piano compositionsfor publicationby the E. B. MarksCorporation;the anthol-
ogy was not published, but the typescript for the foreword is at the Bela
Bartok Archives, New York.
I. MELODIC ECONOMY
One of the first characteristics of folk music that Bartok discovered
and utilized in his own compositions was economy of means:
Along with the freedom of pitch that Bartok found in folk music, he
also found a great variety in the treatment of note values and accent:
[To the averagemusician] a plain old rustic melody sounds incomprehensibly
modern because his ears are not greeted with the comfortable and well known
tonic-dominant variantsof the major and minor scales, but by dorian, lydian,
mixolydian and other remarkableand strange series of tones. And to this is
added the freest of rhythm; not the hackneyed sequence of but one kind of
measure, but a rubato recital with the strangest coloratures-sometimes four
Each letter stands for a quarter-note value; identical letters mean identical
content. The phrase . . . is repeated with shifted accents so that accentuated
partslose their accent in the repeatwhile non-accentuatedpartsgain one.
Source 5 (1943) I, p. 51
After coming into contact with these aspects of folk music, Bartok
revised his own rhythmic thinking:
I also mention the quite incredible rhythmic variety inherent in our peasant
melodies. We find the most conceivably free, rhythmic spontaneity in our
parlando-rubatomelodies; in the melodies with a fixed dance rhythm the most
curious, most inspiring rhythmic combinations are to be found. It therefore
goes without saying that this circumstance pointed the way to altogether
novel rhythmic possibilitiesfor us.
Source 2 (1928), p. 34
Thus, we had three sources to draw from. First, the parlando-rubato;
second, the normal rigid rhythm with occasional changes of measure; and
third, the dotted rhythm. As for the parlando-rubatorhythm, it could mostly
be used in vocal-solo works.8 This kind of musical recitation is in a certain
relation to that created by Debussy in his Pelleas et Melisande and in some of
his songs; [Debussy] again based it on the old-French recitativo. This recita-
tion is in the sharpestpossible contrast to the Schonbergiantreatment of vocal
parts in which the most exaggeratedleaps and restlessnessappear.
What mostly interested us in the rigid rhythm . . . were the changes of
measure. I fully exploited these possibilities . . . in my earliest works, and
later with, perhaps, some exaggeration . . .9
Our third and perhaps most important rhythmic source is the "dotted
rhythm" [Ex. 2]. This, although of vocal origin, can be transferred into
Ex. 2
[ J J . J , J J. J .
, , or j. .), ]
8 Bartokaddedhere: "Kekszakallubol
nehanypelda"["Someexamplesfrom Blue-
beard"].
9 Bartok added here:
"milyen peldak I. suite? II. suite? kesobbiek? tanc-suite,
Huiros hangsz. elso tetel?" ["which examples: ist suite? 2nd suite? later ones? dance
suite, Music for str. first movement?"].
DJ J D | - J^ J S!)
^ ..or JJ
very frequently, 5/8 time or 7/8 time in our [folk]melody. The difference
between these and the regular 2/4 is not essential; it is rather a derivative
difference. 5/8 can be explained as a doubling of one of the eighths in a
2/4-time measure, and 7/8 by a trebling of one of the eighths in a 4/4-time
measure.These strange measures attracted me in a high degree, and their in-
fluence can be discovered in many places [in] my original works. As for the
strangenessof these measures,it is, however, nothing in comparisonwith . . .
"Bulgarian"rhythm formations.
Source 7 (1942-43), pp. 77, 79, &8i
[In Bulgarianrhythm-formations]the smallestunit is very short, the MM.
[value] being about 380. These extremely small units are grouped into higher
unequal units . .. [such as] groups of 2 + 2 + 3 sixteenthswhich form a bar.
There are many differentsuch groups: about 40 or 50.
Source 6 (194I), p. II
III. TONALITY AND MODALITY
Considering the difficulty of describing twentieth-century harmonic
procedures, it is not surprising that Bartok should be a little confusing
when he treats this subject. However, some general principles can be
clearly delineated. The first and most important is that Bartok always con-
sidered folk music and his own music to be tonal:
One point, in particular, I must again stress: Our peasant music, naturally,
is invariably tonal, although not always in the sense that the inflexible major
and minor system is tonal. (An "atonal"folk-music, in my opinion, is unthink-
able.) Since we depend upon a tonal basis of this kind in our creative work, it
is quite self-evidentthat our works are quite pronouncedlytonal in type.
Source 2 (I928), p. 35
Bart6k was so thoroughly rooted in tonal harmony that he could not
even acknowledge the existence of atonality and polytonality:
Perfect and real atonality doesn't exist even in Schonberg'sworks, because of
that unchangeablephysical law concerning the interrelationof the harmonics,
and their relation to their fundamentaltone. When we hear a single tone, we
will interpret it subconsciously as a fundamentaltone. When we hear a fol-
lowing different tone, we will-again subconsciously-project it on the first
tone (felt as being the fundamentalone) and interpret it according to its rela-
tion to the latter. In a so-called atonal work, one selects now this, now another
tone as a fundamentalone, and projects all other happeningsof the piece onto
these selected fundamentals. The same phenomenon appears when dealing
10Bartokaddedthe following exampleshere: the first dance in his ballet, The
Wooden Prince, and the second theme of No. 5 from Ten Easy Piano Pieces.
1 Bart6kadded here: "I used this for instancein my VI Str.
qu. pelda I tetel
2. tema III. tetel trio" [". . . ist movement,2nd theme; 3rd movement,trio"].
tion of the twelve tones comprising our octave . . . (This has nothing to do
with the ultra-chromaticism[of the Wagner-Straussperiod] . . . , for there
chromaticnotes are only chromaticin so far as they are basedupon the under-
lying diatonic scale.) The diatonic element in eastern European folk music
does not in any way conflict with the tendency to equalize the value of
semitones. This tendency can be realised in melody as well as in harmony;
whether the foundation of the folk melodies is diatonic or even pentatonic,
there is still plenty of room in the harmonisationfor equalizing the value of
the semitones.
Source i (1921), pp. 7-8
This analytical concept preceded the period of greatest chromaticism in
Bart6k's original compositions:
My first "chromatic"melody I invented in 1923 and used as the first theme of
my Dance Suite. This has some resemblance to Arab melody . . . This was
only an incidental digressionon my part and had no special consequences.My
second attempt was made in 1926; on that occasion I did not try to imitate
anything known from folkmusic.14I can't rememberhaving met such kinds of
melodic chromaticism deliberately developed to such a degree in any other
contemporarymusic.
Source 7 (1942-43), pp. 65 & 67
By 1928 Bartok felt that he had passed through this period of extreme
chromaticism:
I must admit . .. that there was a time when I thought I was approachinga
species of twelve-tone music. Yet even in works of that period the absolute
tonal foundationis unmistakable.
Source 2 (I928), p. 35
Bartok continued to insist throughout the rest of his life that his music was
based on an "unmistakable"tonal foundation:
The same can be said about my melodies as [what] I have already said con-
cerning the chromaticfolk melodies. That is: the single tones of these melodies
are independent tones having no interrelation between each other; there is,
however, in each specimen of them a decidedly fixed fundamental tone to
which the others resolve in the end.
Source 7 (1942-43), p. 67
To point out the essential difference between atonality, polytonality, and
polymodality in a final word on this subject, we may say that atonal music
offers no fundamentaltone at all, polytonality offers or is supposed to offer
several of them, polymodality offers a single one. Therefore, our music, I
mean the new Hungarian art music, is always based on a single fundamental
tone, as [much] in its entirety as in its sections.
Source 7 (1942-43), P. 47
14Bartokadded nine exampleshere: i) No. 4 from Out of Doors; 2) String
QuartetNo. 4, secondmovement;3) Piano ConcertoNo. 2, second movement;4)
CantataProfana,fugue theme; 5) Music for Strings. . . , first and third move-
ments;6) Sonatafor Two Pianosand Percussion,secondmovement;7) Violin Con-
certo [1937-38],first movement"contrasting"
theme; 8) Divertimentofor String
Orchestra,secondmovement;and9) StringQuartetNo. 6.
A visible sign of the consonant characterof the seventh [in folk music] is the
condition that the regular resolution of the seventh (one degree downward to
the sixth degree) does not occur, in reality cannot occur, because the sixth
degree is missing, [as] for instance, in this old Hungarian melody from
Transdanubia:
Ex. 4
Parlando
-
tt-h r i TI I - -
i; r rrr
I[ 1-- r ,L I -
A principalmotive in my... II. Suite, 2nd movement is as follows:
Ex. 5
"r p
i J _
The final chord of the movement is:
Ex. 6
4 tG rI i I II L.
. . . The frequent repetition of this remarkable skip occasioned the construc-
tion of the simplest fourth chord (which was filled in to be completed as a
consonant chord) and its inversions:
Ex. 8
-5 JI II-I.
II
(a) (b) (c)
Form (b) occurs as the final chord (to be sure derived thematically in the
same manner as the above-mentioned final chord of the II. Suite) in the last
movement of my first string quartet.
Ex. 9
-
1r
Source 2 (1928), pp. 32-33
Through inversion, and by placing these chords in juxtaposition one above the
other, many different chords are obtained and with them the freest melodic
as well as harmonic treatment of the twelve tones of our present day har-
monic system.15
Source 2 (1928), p. 34
15 Because the tritone has been so in
widely exploited twentieth-century music, it
might be interesting to compare Bartok's approach to this interval with Anton
Webern's. Bartok was attracted to it because of its occurrences in the modes used in
folk song, while Webern was attracted to it because of its position at the mathematical
* * # # *