K I, H S, S N, E N: Ffect of Aquatic Weeds On Methane Emission From Submerged Paddy Soil
K I, H S, S N, E N: Ffect of Aquatic Weeds On Methane Emission From Submerged Paddy Soil
K I, H S, S N, E N: Ffect of Aquatic Weeds On Methane Emission From Submerged Paddy Soil
Paddy fields are one of the dominant anthropogenic sources of methane emission to the atmosphere, and the main passageway of
methane from paddy soil is through the rice plant. However, the effect of aquatic weeds on methane emission from rice paddies has
not been properly evaluated yet. Methane emission from weeded pots and unweeded ones with anaerobic paddy soil was measured
throughout the period of rice growth. More than double the amount of methane was emitted from weeded pots compared with unweeded
ones. Peroxidase activity of rice root was not different between weeded and unweeded pots. However, methanogenic bacteria popu-
lations were higher in weeded pots than in unweeded ones, while methane oxidation activity, measured by the propylene oxidation
technique, was higher in unweeded pots than in weeded ones. Methane oxidation activity of roots from three typical aquatic weeds in
paddy fields, Lipocarpha sp., Rotala indica, and Ludwigia epilobioides, was higher than that of rice plants, while lower stems of these
aquatic plants showed similar or lower activity compared with the same areas of rice plants. These results indicate that the role of
aquatic weeds in paddy soil in methane emission should not be overlooked in evaluating mitigation options for reducing methane
emission from paddy fields.
Key words: aquatic weeds; methane emission; methane oxidation; paddy soil; propylene oxidation; rhizosphere.
Paddy fields are one of the dominant anthropogenic sources pots with paddy soils were compared in order to estimate the
of methane to the atmosphere (estimated as 15% of global effect of aquatic weeds on methane flux from paddy soils
methane emission; IPCC, 1994). The main passageway of throughout the period of rice growth. Microbial activities re-
methane emission from anaerobic paddy soils to the atmo- lated to methane production and oxidation in the soil with rice
sphere is through the arenchyma of the rice plant (Oryza sa- plants and typical aquatic weeds in paddy soils were also mea-
tiva) (Cicerone and Shetter, 1981; Inubushi et al., 1989; Nou- sured during crop season to examine possible mitigation op-
chi, Mariko, and Aoki, 1990). One possible mitigation option tions to reduce methane emission from paddy fields.
to reduce methane emission from paddy fields is water man-
agement, such as percolation, mid-summer drainage, and in- MATERIALS AND METHODS
termittent drainage (Inubushi, Muramatsu, and Umebayashi,
Soils and pot experiments—Sandy gley soil was taken from paddy fields
1992; Wassmann, Papen, and Rennenberg, 1993; Yagi, Tsu-
in Kuju-kuri, Chiba prefecture, Central Japan, and 3.5 kg of the moist sieved
ruta, and Minami, 1997). This would introduce oxygen into (,7.5 mm) soil was transferred into 18 plastic pots (0.02 m2 3 20 cm depth).
anaerobic soil, rendering it aerobic, and in so doing reduce the Total carbon, total nitrogen, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and pH(H2O)
formation of methane by enhancing methanotrophic (methane of the soil samples were quantified by standard soil analytical method (Brem-
oxidizing) bacteria in soil (Bosse and Frenzel, 1997; Gilbert ner and Mulvaney, 1982). Mixed chemical fertilizers were applied as basal
and Frenzel, 1998). Organic farming, which involves the use and were equivalent to 100 kg N/ha, 25 kg P/ha, and 42 kg K/ha. Chopped
of organic matter instead of chemical fertilizer and without rice straw (,1 cm length) was applied at 4000 kg/ha on 27 May 1997. Thirty-
herbicide application, has become popular in Japan (AFFRC, five-day-old rice seedlings (Oryza sativa, ‘Nihonbare’) were transplanted 2 d
2000). Both drainage and organic farming may enhance the after fertilizer application and soil submergence. A second fertilizer applica-
growth of weeds in paddy fields. However, the effect of aquat- tion was made as top dressing at the rate of 20 kg N/ha and 42 kg K/ha at
ic weeds in paddy fields on methane emission has not been maximum tillering stage on 25 July. All pots were maintained under flooded
properly evaluated yet. Therefore it is important to investigate conditions by being placed in a large plastic water pool until harvest on 25
whether such feedback would exacerbate methane emission by September. All weeds were manually removed weekly from nine pots (weeded
introducing more organic matter as weeds into the soil or mit- pots), while aquatic weeds, mainly Lipocarpha sp., Rotala indica, and Lud-
igate methane emission by methane oxidation. wigia epilobioides, all typical paddy weeds in Japan, were allowed to grow
In this paper, methane emission from weeded and unweeded with rice plants in the other nine pots (unweeded pots). Height and tiller
numbers of rice plants were measured weekly. Soil Eh (redox potential) was
1
Manuscript received 7 March 2000; revision accepted 14 September 2000. monitored to see the effect of weeds on the anaerobic status in soil at 5 cm
The authors thank ex Prof. Yasuji Fukuda for botanical identification. This depth by Pt electrodes and a pH/Eh meter (Toa Electronics, RM-12P, 29-10-
work was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fishery and Forestry, 1 Takadanobaba, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan). Root, shoot, and the lower parts
Japan, Research Fund on Agroecological Technology for Controlling Factors of rice stems (below soil surface and above the root system) were separated
of Global Environmental Changes, and Research Institute of Innovative Tech- after removal from treatment pots, washed thoroughly, and weighed after dry-
nology for The Earth Fund on Excellent Research Project headed by Prof. ing at 808C for 24 h on 50, 82, and 111 d after transplanting (DAT). Similarly,
Emer. Iwao Watanabe.
corresponding parts of the aquatic weeds were also taken from the unweeded
2
Author for reprint requests (Tel 181-47-308-8816, Fax 181-47-308-8720,
e-mail inubushi@midori.h.chiba-u.ac.jp). pots on the same dates and treated in the same way as the rice plants.
3
Current address: Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Yoshiki 3224-
3-508, Yamaguchi 753-0811 Japan. Methane emission—During rice growth, methane emission was measured
4
Current address: Kimitsu Agroforestry Highschool, Aoyagi 48, Kimitsu, almost weekly using the closed chamber method (Inubushi et al., 1989). A
Chiba, 292-0454 Japan. cylindrical acrylic chamber (15 cm diameter 3 1 m height) was placed on
975
976 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY [Vol. 88
Fig. 1. Temporal changes in methane flux from weeded (SP) and un- Fig. 2. Temporal changes in soil redox potential (Eh) (5 cm) in weeded
weeded plots (SW). Bars indicate SD of the mean. (SP) and unweeded plots (SW). Bars indicate SD of the mean.
RESULTS
Fig. 3. Temporal changes in plant height (a) and tiller number (b) of rice
Methane flux from weeded and unweeded plots—The soil planted in weeded (SP) and unweeded plots (SW). Bars indicate SD of the
had total carbon 5 7.9 g/kg, total nitrogen 5 0.8 g/kg, cation mean.
June 2001] INUBUSHI ET AL.—EFFECT OF AQUATIC WEEDS ON CH4 EMISSION 977
Fig. 4. Dry mass of shoot (upper) and root (lower) of rice (R) and weed
(W) in weeded (SP) and unweeded plots (SW). Bars indicate SD of the mean.
4). Similarly, the peroxidase activity of rice roots showed no Fig. 6. Populations of methanogenic bacteria (upper) and their activity
difference between these pots, although it decreased gradually (lower) in soil of weeded (SP) and unweeded plots (SW). Bars indicate SD
of the mean. DAT 5 days after transplanting, MPN 5 most probable number.
from 50 DAT to harvest (Fig. 5).
Methanogenic bacteria and methane production activity in Methane oxidation activity of roots of three aquatic
soil—Populations of methanogenic bacteria in soil was 4–7 weeds—Roots of Lipocarpha sp., Rotala indica, and Ludwigia
times higher in weeded pots than in unweeded ones (Fig. 6). epilobioides, typical aquatic weeds in paddy fields in central
Methane production activity was also higher in weeded pots Japan, showed higher methane oxidation activity than those of
than in unweeded ones on 82 and 111 DAT. rice plants. The methane oxidation activity was rated in the
order of Ludwigia . Lipocarpha . Rotala . rice (Fig. 8).
Methane oxidation activity of soil—Methane oxidation ac- On the other hand, lower parts of the stem of rice plants
tivity measured by the propylene oxidation technique was showed much higher methane oxidation activity than roots.
higher in unweeded pots than in weeded ones, particularly The other parts of the aquatic plants showed almost the same
during the later part of the croping season (Fig. 7). methane oxidation activity as the roots of each plant, and this
Fig. 5. Peroxidase activity (mg alpha-naphthylamine · g DM21 · h21) of Fig. 7. Methane oxidation activity in soil of weeded (SP) and unweeded
rice root in weeded (SP) and unweeded plots (SW). Bars indicate SD of the plots (SW). Bars indicate SD of the mean. PPO 5 Propylene oxide, DM 5
mean. dry matter.
978 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY [Vol. 88
Fig. 8. Potential methane oxidation activity of plant parts in rice (Oryza) and three species of weeds (Rotala, Lipocarpha, and Ludwigia) growing in flooded
paddy soil. Bars indicate SD of the mean. DM 5 dry matter.
was similar or lower as compared with the same parts of rice garded as the difference between methane production and
plants. methane oxidation. Both activities in this study were measured
separately in soil and plant parts under laboratory conditions.
DISCUSSION Therefore, in situ activity in the soil–plant system should also
be examined more carefully in estimating methane oxidation.
The significance of rice plants in methane emission from Weeds did not reduce the growth of rice plants under these
paddy soils to the atmosphere has been recognized since Ci- experimental conditions (Fig. 3), even though the dry mass of
cerone and Shetter (1981). Inubushi et al. (1989) estimated weed shoots was ;14–19% of those of rice shoots (Fig. 4).
that .90 % of methane flux was through rice plants. Nouchi, However, these results should be examined in detail under var-
Mariko, and Aoki (1990) examined in detail methane passage ious conditions. Food production could be sustained and meth-
through rice plants. A similar movement of methane from soil ane emissions might be decreased by reducing the application
to the atmosphere was also reported for other hygrophytes of agrochemicals, such as herbicides and by maintaining or
(Wagatsuma et al., 1992; Frenzel and Rudolph, 1998). During increasing organic matter application to soil. Moreover, meth-
methane transport from soil to the atmosphere, 20–80% of ane emission from paddy soil can also be mitigated by water
methane was oxidized in rhizosphere soil with rice plants management, such as mid-season drainage and other options.
(Conrad and Rothfuss, 1991; Sass et al., 1991). In natural wet- The results in this study indicate that the role of aquatic weeds
lands, aquatic plants were also important in methane oxidation. in paddy soils in relation to methane emission should not be
King (1994) and Calhoun and King (1998) demonstrated overlooked in evaluating mitigation options to reducing meth-
methane oxidation by methanotrophic bacteria in the rhizo- ane emission from paddy fields.
sphere of aquatic plants. Gilbert and Frenzel (1995), Bosse
and Frenzel (1997), and Gilbert et al. (1998) found similar
phenomena in rice plants. LITERATURE CITED
The present study showed active methane oxidation in rhi-
AFFRC (AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES RESEARCH COUNCIL, JA-
zosphere and lower stem parts of typical aquatic weeds as well PAN). 2000. http://www.maff.go.jp.
as rice plants in paddy fields in Japan. Although the mecha- ASAKAWA, S., AND K. HAYANO. 1995. Populations of methanogenic bacteria
nism employed by these weeds to reduce methane emission is in paddy field soil under double cropping conditions (rice–wheat). Bi-
still not clear, peroxidase activity of rice roots was not influ- ology and Fertility of Soils 20: 113–117.
enced by weeds (Fig. 5). Reduction of methane flux by weeds BOSSE, U., AND P. FRENZEL. 1997. Activity and distribution of methane-
was more likely due to enhancing methanotrophic bacteria oxidizing bacteria in flooded rice soil microcosms and in rice plants
(Oryza sativa). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63: 1199–
(Fig. 7) or repression of methanogenic bacteria in the rhizo- 1207.
sphere (Fig. 6). Both contributions to the reduction of methane BREMNER, J. M., AND C. S. MULVANEY. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In Methods
emissions should be evaluated. Since the potential methane of soil analysis, Part 2, Agronomy monograph 9, 2nd ed., 595–624.
oxidation activity was expressed on a dry matter basis (Fig. American Society of Agronomy—Soil Science Society of America, Mad-
8), the product of (dry matter) 3 (average activity) of weed ison, Wisconsin, USA.
roots were estimated to be about twice that of rice roots. How- CALHOUN, A., AND G. M. KING. 1998. Characterization of root-associated
methanotrophs from three freshwater macrophytes: Pontederia cordata,
ever, rice shoots (lower columns and base of stem) also Sparganium eurycarpum, and Sagittaria latifolia. Applied and Environ-
showed high methane oxidation activity. Therefore, such es- mental Microbiology 64: 1099–1105.
timation should include these parts of rice plants. Methane CHIDTHAISONG, A., K. INUBUSHI, Y. MURAMATSU, AND I. WATANABE. 1996.
emission from anaerobic soil to the atmosphere could be re- Production potential and emission of methane in flooded rice soil micro-
June 2001] INUBUSHI ET AL.—EFFECT OF AQUATIC WEEDS ON CH4 EMISSION 979
cosms after continuous application of straws. Microbes and Environ- ———, Y. MURAMATSU, AND M. UMEBAYASHI. 1992. Influence of perco-
ments 11: 73–78. lation on methane emission from paddy soil. Japanese Journal of Soil
———, ———, AND I. WATANABE. 1996. Methanogenic characteristics of Science and Plant Nutrition 63: 184–189.
flooded rice soils in response to glucose amendment. Soil Science and IPCC (INTERNATIONAL PANNEL FOR CLIMATE CHANGE). 1994. Climate
Plant Nutrition 42: 645–649. change 1994. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
CICERONE, R. J., AND J. D. SHETTER. 1981. Sources of atmospheric methane: KING, G. M. 1994. Association of methanotrophs with the roots and rhizomes
measurements in rice paddies and a discussion. Journal of Geophysics of aquatic vegetation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60:
Research 86C: 7203–7209. 3220–3227.
CONRAD, R., AND F. ROTHFUSS. 1991. Methane oxidation in the soil surface NOUCHI, I., S. MARIKO, AND K. AOKI. 1990. Mechanism of methane transport
layer of a flooded rice field and the effect of ammonium. Biology and from the rhizosphere to the atmosphere through rice plants. Plant Phys-
Fertility of Soils 12: 28–32. iology 94: 59–66.
FRENZEL, P., AND J. RUDOLPH. 1998. Methane emission from a wetland plant: SASS, R., F. M. FISHER, P. A. HARCOMBE, AND F. T. TURNER. 1991. Methane
the role of CH4 oxidation in Eriophorum. Plant and Soil 202: 27–32. emission from rice fields as influenced by solar radiation, temperature
FUTAMI, K. 1990. Method of peroxidase activity. In Methods of plant nutri- and straw incorporation. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 5: 335–350.
tion analysis, 50–52, Hakuyu-sha, Tokyo, Japan. WAGATSUMA, T., K. JUJO, K. TAWARAYA, T. SATO, AND A. UEKI. 1992.
GIBERT, B., B. ASSMUS, A. HARTMANN, AND P. FRENZEL. 1998. In situ lo- Decrease of methane concentration and increase of nitrogen gas concen-
cation of two methanotrophic strains in the rhizosphere of rice plants. tration in the rhizosphere by hygrophytes. Soil Science and Plant Nutri-
FEMS Microbiology Ecology 25: 117–128. tion 38: 467–476.
———, AND P. FRENZEL. 1995. Methanotrophic bacteria in the rhizosphere WASSMANN, R., H. PAPEN, AND H. RENNENBERG. 1993. Methane emission
of rice microcosms and their effect on porewater methane concentration from rice paddies and possible mitigation strategies. Chemosphere 26:
and methane emission. Biology and Fertility of Soils 20: 93–100. 201–217.
———, AND ———. 1998. Rice roots and CH4 oxidation: the activity of WATANABE, I., G. TAKADA, T. HASHIMOTO, AND K. INUBUSHI. 1995. Eval-
bacteria, their distribution and the microenvironment. Soil Biology and uation of alternative substrates for determining methane-oxidizing activ-
Biochemistry 30: 1903–1916. ities and methanotrophic populations in soils. Biology and Fertility of
INUBUSHI, K., K. HORI, S. MATSUMOTO, M. UMEBAYASHI, AND H. WADA. Soils 20: 101–106.
1989. Methane emission from the flooded paddy soil to the atmosphere YAGI, K., H. TSURUTA, AND K. MINAMI. 1997. Possible options for mitigat-
through rice plant. Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition ing methane emission from rice cultivation. Nutrient Cycling in Agroe-
60: 318–324. cosystems 49: 213–220.