Chapter 20 (5) - Variable Costing For Management Analysis: True/False

Chapter 20(5)—Variable Costing For Management Analysis
TRUE/FALSE
1. In determining cost of goods sold, two alternate costing concepts can be used: absorption costing and
variable costing.
ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

NAT: AACSB Analytic | IMA-Cost Management
2. In determining cost of goods sold, two alternate costing concepts can be used: direct costing and
variable costing.
ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

3. Fixed factory overhead costs are included as part of the cost of products manufactured under the
absorption costing concept.

4. Under absorption costing, the cost of finished goods includes direct materials, direct labor, and factory
overhead.

5. Under absorption costing, the cost of finished goods includes only direct materials, direct labor, and
variable factory overhead.

6. In variable costing, the cost of products manufactured is composed of only those manufacturing costs
that increase or decrease as the volume of production rises or falls.

7. In variable costing, fixed costs do not become part of the cost of goods manufactured, but are
considered an expense of the period.

8. Variable costing is also known as direct costing.

170© 2009 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be
different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 20(5)—Variable Costing for Management Analysis 171
9. Property taxes on a factory building would be included as part of the cost of products manufactured
under the absorption costing concept.
ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

10. The factory superintendent's salary would be included as part of the cost of products manufactured
under the variable costing concept.
ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

11. The factory superintendent's salary would be included as part of the cost of products manufactured
under the absorption costing concept.

12. Electricity purchased to operate factory machinery would be included as part of the cost of products
manufactured under the absorption costing concept.

13. The absorption costing income statement does not distinguish between variable and fixed costs.

14. In the absorption costing income statement, deduction of the cost of goods sold from sales yields gross
profit.

15. In the absorption costing income statement, deduction of the cost of goods sold from sales yields
contribution margin.

16. In the absorption costing income statement, deduction of the cost of goods sold from sales yields
manufacturing margin.

© 2009 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different
from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
172 Chapter 20(5)—Variable Costing for Management Analysis
17. On the variable costing income statement, deduction of the variable cost of goods sold from sales
yields gross profit.

18. On the variable costing income statement, deduction of the variable cost of goods sold from sales
yields manufacturing margin.

19. On the variable costing income statement, all of the fixed costs are deducted from the contribution
margin.

20. On the variable costing income statement, variable selling and administrative expenses are deducted
from manufacturing margin to yield contribution margin.

21. On the variable costing income statement, variable costs are deducted from contribution margin to
yield manufacturing margin.

22. On the variable costing income statement, the figure representing the difference between the
contribution margin and income from operations is the fixed manufacturing costs and fixed selling and
administrative expenses.

23. The contribution margin and the manufacturing margin are usually equal.

24. For a period during which the quantity of inventory at the end was larger than that at the beginning,
income from operations reported under variable costing will be larger than income from operations
reported under absorption costing.

25. For a period during which the quantity of inventory at the end was larger than that at the beginning,
income from operations reported under variable costing will be smaller than income from operations

26. For a period during which the quantity of inventory at the end was smaller than that at the beginning,
income from operations reported under variable costing will be larger than income from operations

27. For a period during which the quantity of inventory at the end was smaller than that at the beginning,

28. For a period during which the quantity of inventory at the end equals the inventory at the beginning,

29. For a period during which the quantity of inventory at the end equals the inventory at the beginning,
income from operations reported under variable costing will equal income from operations reported
under absorption costing.

30. For a period during which the quantity of product manufactured exceeded the quantity sold, income
from operations reported under absorption costing will be smaller than income from operations
reported under variable costing.

31. For a period during which the quantity of product manufactured exceeded the quantity sold, income
from operations reported under absorption costing will be larger than income from operations reported
under variable costing.

32. For a period during which the quantity of product manufactured was less than the quantity sold,
income from operations reported under absorption costing will be larger than income from operations

33. For a period during which the quantity of product manufactured was less than the quantity sold,
income from operations reported under absorption costing will be smaller than income from operations

34. For a period during which the quantity of product manufactured equals the quantity sold, income from
operations reported under absorption costing will equal the income from operations reported under
variable costing.

35. For a period during which the quantity of product manufactured equals the quantity sold, income from
operations reported under absorption costing will be smaller than the income from operations reported
under variable costing.

36. Changes in the quantity of finished goods inventory, caused by differences in the levels of sales and
production, directly affects the amount of income from operations reported under absorption costing.

37. Under absorption costing, the amount of income reported from operations can be increased by
producing more units than are sold.

38. Under absorption costing, increases or decreases in income from operations due to changes in
inventory levels could be misinterpreted to be the result of operating efficiencies or inefficiencies.

39. Management may use both absorption and variable costing methods for analyzing a particular product.

40. Property tax expense is an example of a controllable cost for the supervisor of a manufacturing
department.

41. Direct labor cost is an example of a controllable cost for the supervisor of a manufacturing department.

42. In the short run, the selling price of a product should normally not be less than the variable costs and
expenses of making and selling it.

43. In the long run, for a business to remain in operation, the selling price of a product should normally
cover all costs and expenses and provide a reasonable income.

44. For short-run production planning, information in the variable costing format is more useful to
management than is information in the absorption costing concept format.

45. For short-run production planning, information in the absorption costing format is more useful to
management than is information in the variable costing format.

46. Sales mix is generally defined as the relative distribution of sales among the various products sold.

NAT: AACSB Analytic | IMA-Performance Measurement
47. If the ability to sell and the amount of production facilities devoted to each of two products is equal, it
is profitable to increase the sales of that product with the lowest contribution margin.

48. If the ability to sell and the amount of production facilities devoted to each of two products is equal, it
is profitable to increase the sales of that product with the highest contribution margin.

49. The contribution margin ratio is computed as contribution margin divided by sales.

50. In evaluating the performance of salespersons, the salesperson with the highest level of sales should be
evaluated as the best performer.

51. Companies prepare contribution margin reports by market segments and product segments because
products contribute to profitability in various ways.

52. Ford’s Expedition sport utility vehicle is its most profitable model. Therefore Ford should increase
production levels and promotional efforts on its other models to increase their sales.

53. The systematic examination of differences between planned and actual contribution margins is termed
contribution margin analysis.

54. In contribution margin analysis, the effect of a difference in the number of units sold, assuming no
change in unit sales price or cost, is termed the quantity factor.

55. In contribution margin analysis, the effect of a difference in the number of units sold, assuming no
change in unit sales price or cost, is termed the unit price or unit cost factor.

56. In contribution margin analysis, the effect of a difference in unit sales price or unit cost on the number
of units sold is termed the unit price or unit cost factor.

57. In contribution margin analysis, the effect of a difference in unit sales price or unit cost on the number
of units sold is termed the quantity factor.

58. In contribution margin analysis, the quantity factor is computed as the difference between actual
quantity sold and the planned quantity sold, multiplied by the planned unit sales price or unit cost.

59. In contribution margin analysis, the unit price or unit cost factor is computed as the difference between
actual quantity sold and the planned quantity sold, multiplied by the planned unit sales price or unit
cost.

60. In contribution margin analysis, the unit price or unit cost factor is computed as the difference between
the actual unit price or unit cost and the planned unit price or unit cost, multiplied by the actual
quantity sold.

61. A change in the amount of sales can be due to either a change in the units sold or a change in price or
both.

62. Contribution margin reporting and analysis is appropriate only for manufacturing firms, not for service
firms.
ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate OBJ: 20(5)-06

63. Service firms can only have one activity base for analyzing changes in costs.
ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate OBJ: 20(5)-06

64. In a service firm it may be necessary to have several activity bases to properly match the change in
costs with the changes in various activities.
ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate OBJ: 20(5)-06

65. Service firms are unable to use contribution margin report and analysis in their company because these
firms do not sell inventory.

MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. What term is commonly used to describe the concept whereby the cost of manufactured products is
composed of direct materials cost, direct labor cost, and factory overhead cost?
a. Standard costing
b. Variable costing
c. Absorption costing
d. Direct costing
ANS: C PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01
2. What term is commonly used to describe the concept whereby the cost of manufactured products is
composed of direct materials cost, direct labor cost, and variable factory overhead cost?
a. Absorption costing
b. Differential costing
c. Standard costing
d. Variable costing
ANS: D PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01
3. Another name for variable costing is:

a. indirect costing
b. process costing
c. direct costing
d. differential costing
4. Under absorption costing, which of the following costs would not be included in finished goods
inventory?
a. Direct labor cost
b. Direct materials cost
c. Variable and fixed factory overhead cost
d. Variable and fixed selling and administrative expenses
5. Under absorption costing, which of the following costs would not be included in finished goods
inventory?
a. Hourly wages of assembly worker
b. Straight-line depreciation on factory equipment
c. Overtime wages paid factory workers
d. Advertising costs for a furniture manufacturer
ANS: D PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01
6. Under variable costing, which of the following costs would not be included in finished goods
inventory?
a. Direct labor cost
b. Direct materials cost
c. Variable factory overhead cost
d. Fixed factory overhead cost
7. Under variable costing, which of the following costs would be included in finished goods inventory?
a. Selling costs
b. Salary of vice-president of finance
c. Variable factory overhead cost
d. Fixed factory overhead cost
ANS: C PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01
8. Under variable costing, which of the following costs would be included in finished goods inventory?
a. Advertising costs
b. Salary of vice-president of finance
c. Wages of carpenters in a furniture factory
d. Straight-line depreciation on factory equipment
9. Under variable costing, which of the following costs would not be included in finished goods
inventory?
a. Wages of machine operator
b. Steel costs for a machine tool manufacturer
c. Salary of factory supervisor
d. Oil costs used to lubricate machinery
10. Which of the following would be included in the cost of a product manufactured according to
absorption costing?
a. Advertising expense
b. Sales salaries
c. double declining balance depreciation expense on factory building
d. Office supplies costs
11. Which of the following would be included in the cost of a product manufactured according to variable
costing?
a. Sales commissions
b. Property taxes on factory buildings
c. Interest expense
d. Direct materials
12. On the variable costing income statement, the figure representing the difference between
manufacturing margin and contribution margin is the:
a. fixed manufacturing costs
b. variable cost of goods sold
c. fixed selling and administrative expenses
d. variable selling and administrative expenses
13. In the variable costing income statement, deduction of variable selling and administrative expenses
from manufacturing margin yields:
a. differential margin
b. contribution margin
c. gross profit
d. marginal expenses
ANS: B PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01
14. The amount of income under absorption costing will equal the amount of income under variable
costing when units manufactured:
a. exceed units sold
b. equal units sold
c. are less than units sold
d. are equal to or greater than units sold
ANS: B PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01
15. The amount of income under absorption costing will be less than the amount of income under variable
costing when units manufactured:
b. equal units sold
16. Which of the following statements is correct using the direct costing concept?
a. All manufacturing costs are included in the calculation of cost of goods manufactured
b. Only fixed costs are included in the calculation of cost of goods manufactured while
variable costs are considered period costs.
c. Only variable manufacturing costs are included in the calculation of cost of goods
manufactured while fixed costs are considered period costs.
d. All manufacturing costs are considered period costs.
ANS: C PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate OBJ: 20(5)-01
17. The amount of income under absorption costing will be more than the amount of income under
variable costing when units manufactured:
b. equal units sold
ANS: A PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01
18. The level of inventory of a manufactured product has increased by 7,000 units during a period. The
following data are also available:
Variable Fixed
Unit manufacturing costs of the period $12.00 $6.00
Unit operating expenses of the period 4.00 1.50
What would be the effect on income from operations if absorption costing is used rather than variable
costing?
a. $42,000 decrease
b. $42,000 increase
c. $52,500 increase
d. $59,500 increase
ANS: B PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate OBJ: 20(5)-02
Variable Fixed
Unit manufacturing costs of the period $24 $10
Unit operating expenses of the period 8 3
What would be the effect on income from operations if variable costing is used rather than absorption
costing?
a. $80,000 decrease
b. $80,000 increase
c. $88,000 increase
d. $104,000 increase
ANS: A PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate OBJ: 20(5)-02
Variable Fixed
Unit manufacturing costs of the period $11.00 $7.00
Unit operating expenses of the period 3.00 2.50
costing?
a. $70,000 decrease
b. $70,000 increase
c. $45,000 increase
d. $95,000 increase
Variable Fixed
costing?
a. $80,000 decrease
b. $80,000 increase
c. $88,000 increase
Variable Fixed
costing?
a. $50,000 decrease
b. $50,000 increase
c. $88,000 increase
Variable Fixed
costing?
a. $44,000 decrease
b. $44,000 increase
c. $64,000 increase
d. $52,000 increase
24. A business operated at 100% of capacity during its first month and incurred the following costs:
Production costs (20,000 units):

Direct materials $180,000
Direct labor 240,000
Variable factory overhead 280,000
Fixed factory overhead 100,000 $800,000
Operating expenses:
Variable operating expenses $130,000
Fixed operating expenses 50,000 180,000
If 1,600 units remain unsold at the end of the month, what is the amount of inventory that would be
reported on the variable costing balance sheet?
a. $64,000
b. $56,000
c. $66,400
d. $68,000

Direct materials $ 80,000
Operating expenses:
Variable operating expenses $ 65,000
reported on the absorption costing balance sheet?
a. $38,000
b. $28,000
c. $34,000
d. $47,000

Operating expenses:
a. $64,000
b. $56,000
c. $60,000
d. $52,500
ANS: D PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate OBJ: 20(5)-02

Direct materials $ 80,000
Operating expenses:
If 600 units remain unsold at the end of the month, what is the amount of inventory that would be
a. $20,400
b. $28,200
c. $22,800
d. $34,000

Direct labor 85,000
Operating expenses:
a. $5,625
b. $5,250
c. $5,760
d. $6,075

Operating expenses:
a. $22,500
b. $36,000
c. $42,400
d. $38,500

Direct labor 40,000
Operating expenses:
If 2,000 units remain unsold at the end of the month and sales total $300,000 for the month, what
would be the amount of income from operations reported on the variable costing income statement?
a. $108,000
b. $100,000
c. $114,800
d. $140,000

Direct labor 20,000
Operating expenses:
If 1,000 units remain unsold at the end of the month and sales total $150,000 for the month, what
would be the amount of income from operations reported on the absorption costing income statement?
a. $50,400
b. $50,000
c. $52,000
d. $70,000

Direct labor 40,000
Operating expenses:
If 2,000 units remain unsold at the end of the month and sales total $300,000 for the month, what is the
amount of the manufacturing margin that would be reported on the variable costing income statement?
a. $100,000
b. $108,000
c. $140,000
d. $114,800

Direct labor 20,000
Operating expenses:
amount of the manufacturing margin that would be reported on the absorption costing income
statement?
a. $50,000
b. $54,000
c. not reported
d. $70,000

Direct labor 20,000
Operating expenses:
amount of the contribution margin that would be reported on the variable costing income statement?
a. $51,400
b. $52,000
c. $54,000
d. $53,000
35. A business operated at 100% of capacity during its first month, with the following results:
Sales (160 units) $160,000

Production costs (200 units):
Direct labor 20,000
Fixed factory overhead 4,000 134,000
Operating expenses:
What is the amount of the manufacturing margin that would be reported on the variable costing
income statement?
a. $30,000
b. $38,800
c. $56,000
d. $44,000
A business operated at 100% of capacity during its first month, with the following results:
Sales (90 units) $90,000

Production costs (100 units):
Direct labor 20,000
Fixed factory overhead 5,000 67,000
Operating expenses:
36. What is the amount of the contribution margin that would be reported on the variable costing income
statement?
a. $23,000
b. $20,000
c. $28,000
d. $26,200
37. What is the amount of the income from operations that would be reported on the variable costing
income statement?
a. $19,400
b. $20,200
c. $22,000
d. $28,000
38. What is the amount of the income from operations that would be reported on the absorption costing
income statement?
a. $21,000
b. $20,700
c. $22,000
d. $28,000
39. What is the amount of the gross profit that would be reported on the absorption costing income
statement?
a. $19,400
b. $21,000
c. $29,700
d. $22,000
40. Accountants prefer the variable costing method over absorption costing method for evaluating the
performance of a company because
a. by using the absorption costing method, income could appear to be higher by producing
more inventory.
b. by using the absorption method, more sales will be generated.
c. by using the variable costing method, the cost of goods sold will be higher as more units
are manufactured and sales remain the same.
d. by using the variable costing method, all fixed and variable costs are included in the unit
cost of the product manufactured.
41. Under which inventory costing method could increases or decreases in income from operations be
misinterpreted to be the result of operating efficiencies or inefficiencies?
a. Variable costing
b. Absorption costing
c. Incremental costing
d. Differential costing
42. It would be acceptable to have the selling price of a product just above the variable costs and expenses
of making and selling it in:
a. the long run
b. the short run
c. both the short run and long run
d. monopoly situations
43. Costs that can be influenced by management at a specific level of management are called:
a. direct costs.
b. indirect costs.
c. noncontrollable costs.
d. controllable costs.
44. Under the variable costing method variable manufacturing costs are easier to identify and control
because:
a. Variable and fixed costs are reported separately.
b. Variable costs can be controlled by the operating management.
c. Fixed costs, such as property insurance, are normally the responsibility of higher
management not the operating management.
d. All of the above are true.
45. Which of the following is not true when determining the selling price for a product?
a. Absorption costing should be used to determine routine pricing which include both fixed
and variable costs.
b. As long as the selling price is set above the variable costs, the company will make a profit.
c. Variable costing is effective when determining short run decisions, but absorption costing
is generally used for long-term pricing policies.
d. Both variable and absorption pricing plans should be considered, to include several pricing
alternatives.
46. Management will use both variable and absorption costing in the following activities except:
a. Controlling Costs
b. Product Pricing
c. Planning of Production
d. Controlling Inventory Levels
47. The relative distribution of sales among various products sold is referred to as the:
a. by-product mix
b. joint product mix
c. profit mix
d. sales mix
48. Management should concentrate its sales and production efforts on the product or products with:
a. the highest sales
b. the lowest costs
c. the highest contribution margin
d. the highest contribution margin per unit
49. The contribution margin ratio is computed as:

a. sales divided by contribution margin
b. contribution margin divided by sales
c. contribution margin divided by cost of sales
d. contribution margin divided by variable cost of sales
50. For a supervisor of a manufacturing department, which of the following costs are controllable?
a. Direct materials
b. Insurance on factory building
c. Depreciation of factory building
d. Rent on factory building
ANS: A PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-04
51. Sales territory profitability analysis can determine profit differences between territories due to
a. Pricing, variable costs, and selling costs
b. Variable costs, selling costs, and types of products sold
c. Pricing, selling costs, and type of products sold
d. Sales volumes, pricing, and variable costs.
52. Contribution margin reporting can be beneficial for analyzing the following:
a. Sales personal
b. Products
c. Sales Territory
d. All of the above.
53. If sales totaled $200,000 for the current year (10,000 units at $20 each) and planned sales totaled
$150,000 (12,500 units at $12 each), the effect of the unit price factor on the change in sales is a:
a. $80,000 increase
b. $20,000 decrease
c. $30,000 increase
d. $30,000 decrease
54. In contribution margin analysis, the effect of a change in the number of units sold, assuming no change
in unit sales price or unit cost, is referred to as the:
a. sales factor
b. cost of goods sold factor
c. quantity factor
d. price factor
55. In contribution margin analysis, the increase or decrease in unit sales price or unit cost on the number
of units sold is referred to as the:
a. sales factor
b. cost of goods sold factor
c. quantity factor
d. unit price or unit cost factor
56. In contribution margin analysis, the quantity factor is computed as:

a. the increase or decrease in the number of units sold multiplied by the planned unit sales
price or unit cost
b. the increase or decrease in unit sales price or unit cost multiplied by the planned number
of units to be sold
c. the increase or decrease in the number of units sold multiplied by the actual unit sales
price or unit cost
d. the increase or decrease in the unit sales price or unit cost multiplied by the actual number
of units sold
ANS: A PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-05
57. In contribution margin analysis, the quantity factor is computed as:

a. the difference between actual unit price or unit cost and the planned unit price or cost,
multiplied by the planned quantity sold
b. the difference between actual unit price or unit cost and the planned unit price or cost,
multiplied by the actual quantity sold
c. the difference between the actual quantity sold and the planned quantity sold, multiplied
by the planned unit sales price or unit cost
d. the difference between the actual quantity sold and the planned quantity sold, multiplied
by the actual unit sales price or unit cost
58. In contribution margin analysis, the unit price or unit cost factor is computed as:
a. the difference between the actual unit price or unit cost and the planned unit price or cost,
multiplied by the planned quantity sold
b. the difference between the actual unit price or unit cost and the planned unit price or cost,
multiplied by the actual quantity sold
c. the difference between the actual quantity sold and the planned quantity sold, multiplied
by the planned unit sales price or unit cost
d. the difference between the actual quantity sold and the planned quantity sold, multiplied
by the actual unit sales price or unit cost
59. If variable cost of goods sold totaled $80,000 for the year (16,000 units at $5 each) and the planned
variable cost of goods sold totaled $84,000 (15,000 units at $5.60 each), the effect of the quantity
factor on the change in variable cost of goods sold is:
a. $4,000 decrease
b. $5,000 increase
c. $5,600 increase
d. $5,600 decrease
variable cost of goods sold totaled $84,000 (15,000 units at $5.60 each), the effect of the unit cost
a. $4,000 decrease
b. $5,000 increase
c. $9,600 decrease
d. $5,600 increase
61. If variable selling and administrative expenses totaled $120,000 for the year (80,000 units at $1.50
each) and the planned variable selling and administrative expenses totaled $120,900 (78,000 units at
$1.55 each), the effect of the quantity factor on the change in variable selling and administrative
expenses is:
a. $900 decrease
b. $3,100 decrease
c. $4,000 decrease
d. $3,100 increase
62. If variable selling and administrative expenses totaled $120,000 for the year (80,000 units at $1.50
each) and the planned variable selling and administrative expenses totaled $120,900 (78,000 units at
$1.55 each), the effect of the unit cost factor on the change in variable selling and administrative
expenses is:
a. $900 decrease
b. $3,100 decrease
c. $4,000 decrease
d. $3,100 increase
63. If sales totaled $800,000 for the year (80,000 units at $10 each) and the planned sales totaled $819,000
(78,000 units at $10.50 each), the effect of the unit price factor on the change in sales is:
a. $19,000 decrease
b. $21,000 increase
c. $40,000 decrease
d. $21,000 decrease
64. If sales totaled $800,000 for the year (80,000 units at $10 each) and the planned sales totaled $819,000
(78,000 units at $10.50 each), the effect of the quantity factor on the change in sales is:
a. $21,000 increase
b. $19,000 decrease
c. $21,000 decrease
d. $40,000 decrease
variable cost of goods sold totaled $88,000 (16,000 units at $5.50 each), the effect of the quantity
a. $2,000 decrease
b. $11,000 increase
c. $9.000 increase
d. $9,000 decrease
variable cost of goods sold totaled $88,000 (16,000 units at $5.50 each), the effect of the unit cost
a. $2,000 decrease
b. $2,000 increase
c. $11,000 increase
d. $9,000 decrease
67. The difference between the planned and actual contribution margin can be caused by:
a. an increase or decrease in the amount of sales
b. an increase in the amount of variable costs and expenses
c. a decrease in the amount of variable costs and expenses
d. all of the above
68. The systematic examination of the differences between planned and actual contribution margin is
termed:
a. gross profit analysis
b. contribution margin analysis
c. sales mix analysis
d. volume variance analysis
69. Ednas’s Chocolate had planned to sell their chocolate covered strawberries for $3.00 each. Due to
various factors the actual price was $2.75. Ednas’s was able to sell 1,000 more strawberries than
anticipated to 4,000. What is the a) quantity factor and b) the price factor for sales?
a. a) $3,000, b) ($1,000)
b. a) $3,000, b) $2,000
c. a) $1,000 b) $2,000
d. a) ($3,000) b) ($2,000)
70. Contribution margin analysis focuses on the effects of:

a. the quantity factor
b. the unit cost factor
c. the unit sales price factor
d. all of the above
71. In which of the following types of firms would it be appropriate to prepare contribution margin
reporting and analysis?
a. Boat manufacturing
b. A chain of beauty salons.
c. Home building
d. all of the above
72. Which of the following would not be an appropriate activity base for cost analysis in a service firm?
a. Lawns mowed.
b. Inventory produced
c. Customers served.
d. Haircuts given
EXERCISE/OTHER
1. Philadelphia Company has the following information for March:
Sales $450,000
Variable cost of goods sold 230,000
Fixed manufacturing costs 70,000
Variable selling and administrative expenses 52,000
Fixed selling and administrating expenses 35,000
Determine the March (a) manufacturing margin, (b) contribution margin, and (c) income from
operations for Philadelphia Company.
ANS:
(a) $220,000 ($450,000 - $230,000)
(b) $168,000 ($220,000 - $52,000)
(c) $63,000 ($168,000 - $70,000 - $35,000)
PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate OBJ: 20(5)-01

NAT: AACSB Analytic | IMA-Cost Management TOP: Example Exercise 20(5)-1
2. Cades Company has the following information for March:
Sales $500,000
Fixed manufacturing costs 85,000
Variable selling and administrative expenses 56,000
Fixed selling and administrating expenses 50,000
Determine the March (a) manufacturing margin, (b) contribution margin, and (c) income from
operations for Cades Company.
ANS:
(a) $255,000 ($500,000 - $245,000)
(b) $199,000 ($255,000 - $56,000)
(c) $64,000 ($199,000 - $85,000 - $50,000)

3. Fixed costs are $10 per unit and variable costs are $25 per unit. Production was 13,000 units, while
sales were 12,000 units. Determine (a) whether variable cost income from operations is less than or
greater than absorption costing income from operations, and (b) the difference in variable costing and
absorption costing income from operations.
ANS:
(a) Variable costing income from operations is less than absorption cost income from
operations.
(b) $10,000 ($10 per unit  1,000 units)

4. Fixed costs are $50 per unit and variable costs are $125 per unit. Production was 130,000 units, while
sales were 125,000 units. Determine (a) whether variable cost income from operations is less than or
greater than absorption costing income from operations, and (b) the difference in variable costing and
absorption costing income from operations.
ANS:
(a) Variable costing income from operations is less than absorption cost income from
operations.
(b) $250,000 ($50 per unit  5,000 units)

5. The beginning inventory is 10,000 units. All of the units manufactured during the period and 8,000
units of the beginning inventory were sold. The beginning inventory fixed costs are $50 per unit, and
variable costs are $300 per unit. Determine (a) whether variable costing income from operations is less
than or greater than absorption costing income from operations, and (b) the difference in variable
costing and absorption income from operations.
ANS:
(a) Variable costing income from operations is greater than absorption costing income
from operations.
(b) $400,000 ($50 per unit  8,000 units)
6. The beginning inventory is 5,000 units. All of the units manufactured during the period and 3,000
units of the beginning inventory were sold. The beginning inventory fixed costs are $20 per unit, and
variable costs are $55 per unit. Determine (a) whether variable costing income from operations is less
than or greater than absorption costing income from operations, and (b) the difference in variable
costing and absorption income from operations.
ANS:
(a) Variable costing income from operations is greater than absorption costing income
from operations.
(b) $60,000 ($20 per unit  3,000 units)

7. Variable costs are $80 per unit, and fixed costs are $40,000. Sales are estimated to be 4,000 units. (a)
How much would absorption costing income from operations differ between a plan to produce 4,000
units and a plan to produce 5,000 units? (b) How much would variable costing income from operations
differ between the two production plans?
ANS:
(a) $8,000 greater 4,000 units x ($10.00 - $8.00), or [1,000 units  $40,000/5,000)]
(b) There would be no difference in variable costing income from operations between the
two plans.

8. If variable manufacturing costs are $15 per unit and total fixed manufacturing costs are $200,000,
what is the manufacturing cost per unit if:
(a) 20,000 units are manufactured and the company uses the variable costing concept?
(b) 25,000 units are manufactured and the company uses the variable costing concept?
(c) 20,000 units are manufactured and the company uses the absorption costing concept?
(d) 25,000 units are manufactured and the company used the absorption costing concept?
ANS:
(a) $15 (variable cost only)
(b) $15 (variable cost only)
(c) $25 (variable cost ($15) + fixed costs ($200,000 / 20,000) )
(d) $23 (variable cost ($15) + fixed costs ($200,000 / 25,000) )

9. The following data are for Trendy Fashion Apparel:
North South
Sales volume (units):
Blouses 5,000 5,000
Shorts 4,000 8,000
Sales Price:
Blouses $20.00 $22.00
Shorts $18.00 $20.00
Variable cost per unit
Blouses $ 7.00 $ 9.00
Shorts $ 9.00 $11.00
Determine the contribution margin for (a) Shorts and (b) the South Region.
ANS:
(a) $108,000 [4,000 units  ($18 - $9)] + [8,000 units  ($20 - $11)]
(b) $137,000 [5,000 units  ($22 - $9)] + [8,000 units  ($20 - $11)]
PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-04

NAT: AACSB Analytic | IMA-Performance Measurement TOP: Example Exercise 20(5)-5
10. The actual price for a product was $50 per unit, while the planned price was $44 per unit. The volume
increased by 4,000 to 60,000 total units. Determine the (a) quantity factor and the (b) price factor for
sales.
ANS:
(a) $200,000 increase (4,000 units  $50 per unit)
(b) $360,000 increase ($50 - $44)  60,000 units

NAT: AACSB Analytic | IMA-Performance Measurement TOP: Example Exercise 20(5)-6
PROBLEM
1. On January 1 of the current year, Townsend Co. commenced operations. It operated its plant at 100%
of capacity during January. The following data summarized the results for January:
Units
Production 50,000
=====
Sales ($18 per unit) 42,000
Inventory, January 31 8,000
Total Cost or Expense:

Manufacturing costs:
Variable $575,000
Fixed 80,000
Total $655,000
=======
Selling and administrative expenses:
Variable $ 35,000
Fixed 10,500
Total $ 45,500
=======
(a) Prepare an income statement in accordance with absorption costing.

(b) Prepare an income statement in accordance with variable costing.
ANS:
(a)
Townsend Co.
Absorption Costing Income Statement
For Month Ended January 31, 20--
Sales $756,000
Cost of goods sold:
Cost of goods manufactured $655,000
Less inventory, January 31, 20-- 104,800
Cost of goods sold 550,200
Gross profit $205,800
Selling and administrative expenses 45,500
Income from operations $160,300
=======
(b)
Townsend Co.
Variable Costing Income Statement
For Month Ended January 31, 20--
Sales $756,000
Variable cost of goods sold:
Variable cost of goods manufactured $575,000
Less inventory, January 31, 20-- 92,000
Manufacturing margin $273,000
Variable selling and administrative expense 35,000
Contribution margin $238,000
Fixed costs:
Fixed manufacturing costs $ 80,000
Fixed selling and administrative expenses 10,500 90,500
Income from operations $147,500
=======

2. On October 31, the end of the first month of operations, Morristown & Co. prepared the following
income statement based on absorption costing:
Morristown & Co.

Income Statement
For Month Ended October 31, 20-
Sales (2,600 units) $104,000
Cost of goods sold:
Cost of goods manufactured $85,500
Less ending inventory (400 units) 11,400
Cost of goods sold 74,100
Gross profit $ 29,900
Selling and administrative expenses 21,500
Income from operations $ 8,400
========
If the fixed manufacturing costs were $42,900 and the variable selling and administrative expenses
were $14,600, prepare an income statement in accordance with the variable costing concept.
ANS:
Morristown & Co.

Income Statement
For Month Ended October 31, 20-
Sales $104,000
Less ending inventory
(400 units x $14.50) 5,680
Contribution margin
Manufacturing margin
$ 67,080
$ 52,480
Variable selling and administrative expenses
14,600
Mixed costs:
Fixed manufacturing costs $42,900
Fixed selling and administrative expenses 6,900 49,800
========
Computations:
Variable cost of goods manufactured: $85,500 - $42,900 = $42,600
Unit cost of ending inventory:
$42,600 variable cost of goods manufactured = $14.20

3,000 units manufactured
Fixed selling and admin. expenses: $21,500 - $14,600 = $6,900

3. Presented below are the major categories or captions that would appear on an income statement
prepared in the variable costing format:
Contribution margin
Fixed costs
Income from operations
Sales
Variable cost of goods sold
(a) Arrange the above captions in the proper order in accordance with the variable
costing concept.
(b) Which of the captions represents (1) the difference between sales and the total of all
the variable costs and expenses and (2) the remaining amount of revenue available
for fixed manufacturing costs, fixed expenses, and net income?
ANS:
(a) Sales
Variable cost of goods sold
Contribution margin
Fixed costs
Income from operations
(b) (1) Contribution margin
(2) Contribution margin
PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-02

4. On August 31, the end of the first year of operations, during which 18,000 units were manufactured
and 13,500 units were sold, Olympic Inc. prepared the following income statement based on the
variable costing concept:
Olympic Inc.
Income Statement
For Year Ended August 31, 20--
Sales $297,000
Less ending inventory 72,000
Manufacturing margin $ 81,000
Variable selling and administrative
expenses 40,500
Contribution margin $ 40,500
Fixed costs:
Fixed manufacturing costs $ 12,000
Fixed selling and administrative
expenses 10,800 22,800
========
Determine the unit cost of goods manufactured, based on (a) the variable costing concept and (b) the
absorption costing concept.
ANS:
(a) $16.00 ($288,000 total variable cost of goods manufactured/18,000 units manufactured.)
(b) Unit variable cost of goods manufactured (a) $16.00

Unit fixed cost of goods manufactured
($12,000/18,000 units manufactured) .67
Unit cost $16.67
======

5. Gyro Company manufactures Products T and W and is operating at full capacity. To manufacture
Product W requires three times the number of machine hours required for Product T. Market research
indicates that 1,000 additional units of Product W could be sold. The contribution margin by unit of
product is as follows:
Product T Product W
Sales price $300 $325
Variable cost of goods sold 235 250
Manufacturing margin $ 65 $ 75
expenses 25 10
Contribution margin $ 40 $ 65
==== ====
Calculate the increase or decrease in total contribution margin if 1,000 additional units of Product W
are produced and sold.
ANS:
Additional contribution margin from sale of additional 1,000 units of
Product W (1,000 $65) $ 65,000
Less contribution margin from forgoing production and sale of 3,000 units
of Product T (3,000 $40) 120,000
Decrease in total contribution margin ($55,000)
=========

6. Based upon the following data taken from the records of Bruce Inc., prepare a contribution margin
analysis report for the year ended December 31, 2010.
For Year Ended

December 31, 2010
Difference
Increase
Actual Planned (Decrease)
Sales $312,000 $325,000 ($13,000)

Less:
Variable cost of goods sold $169,200 $182,000 ($12,800)
32,400 39,000 (6,600)
expenses
Total $201,600 $221,000 ($19,400)
=====================Contribution
$110,400 $104,000 $ 6,400
margin
Number of units sold 120,000 130,000
Per unit:
Sales price $2.60 $2.50 .10
Variable cost of goods sold 1.41 1.40 .01
expenses .27 .30 (.03)
ANS:
Bruce Inc.
Contribution Margin Analysis
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Decrease in amount of sales attributed to:
Quantity factor:
Decrease in number of units sold in 2010 10,000
Planned sales price in 2010 $2.50 $25,000
Price factor:
Increase in unit sales price in 2010 $ .10
Number of units sold in 2010 120,000 12,000
Net decrease in amount of sales $13,000
Decrease in amount of variable cost of

goods sold attributed to:
Quantity factor:
Planned unit cost in 2010 $1.40 $14,000
Unit cost factor:
Increase in unit cost in 2010 $ .01
Net decrease in amount of variable cost of
goods sold 12,800
Decrease in amount of variable cost of selling

and administrative expenses attributed to:
Quantity factor:
Planned unit cost in 2010 $ .30 $ 3,000
Unit cost factor:
Decrease in unit cost in 2010 $ .03
Net decrease in amount of variable cost of
selling and administrative expenses 6,600
Increase in contribution margin $ 6,400
=======

7. The Excelsior Company has three salespersons. Below is given their average sales price per unit sold,
average variable manufacturing costs per unit, and number of units sold. Their commissions are
according to the following schedule: $0 to 49,999 - 5%; $50,000 to $52,999 - 7 %; $53,000+ 8%.
Salesperson Mary Q John A. Susan B.

Avg. Selling price per unit 50.00 65.00 45.00
Avg. Var. Mfg. costs per unit 25.00 30.00 35.00
Number of units sold 1,000 750 1,200
Prepare a contribution by salesperson report.
ANS:
Salesperson Mary Q John A Susan B
Total Sales 50,000 48,750 54,000
Variable mfg. costs per unit 25,000 22,500 42,000
Manufacturing margin 25,000 26,250 12,000
commissions 3,500 2,437.50 4,320
Contribution margin per salesperson 21,500 23,812.50 7,680
PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate OBJ: 20(5)-04 | 20(5)-06


Chapter 20 (5) - Variable Costing For Management Analysis: True/False

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 20 (5) - Variable Costing For Management Analysis: True/False

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 20 (5) - Variable Costing For Management Analysis: True/False

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 20(5)—Variable Costing For Management Analysis

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

8. Variable costing is also known as direct costing.

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-01

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-02

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-02

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-02

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-03

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-03

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-03

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-03

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-03

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-03

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-03

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-04

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-04

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-04

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-04

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Difficult OBJ: 20(5)-04

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-04

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-04

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-05

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-05

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-05

ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-05

ANS: F PTS: 1 DIF: Easy OBJ: 20(5)-05