Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 23 views

    Chapter V: Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation

    Uploaded by

    Mpgmhl C John Lyndon
    This chapter summarizes the study which evaluated the Alternative Seed Dryer and Cleaner (ASDaC) machine. The ASDaC was found to have no significant differences compared to traditional solar seed drying in terms of acceptance by farmers or cost and savings. It was also found to have no significant differences compared to commercial seed dryers in terms of cost or savings. The conclusion is that the ASDaC machine is as effective as traditional methods. Recommendations include constructing larger volume machines that are quieter and powered by electricity or gasoline.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Chapter V: Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation

    Uploaded by

    Mpgmhl C John Lyndon
    23 views2 pages
    This chapter summarizes the study which evaluated the Alternative Seed Dryer and Cleaner (ASDaC) machine. The ASDaC was found to have no significant differences compared to traditional solar seed drying in terms of acceptance by farmers or cost and savings. It was also found to have no significant differences compared to commercial seed dryers in terms of cost or savings. The conclusion is that the ASDaC machine is as effective as traditional methods. Recommendations include constructing larger volume machines that are quieter and powered by electricity or gasoline.

    Original Title

    CHAPTER V

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This chapter summarizes the study which evaluated the Alternative Seed Dryer and Cleaner (ASDaC) machine. The ASDaC was found to have no significant differences compared to traditional solar seed drying in terms of acceptance by farmers or cost and savings. It was also found to have no significant differences compared to commercial seed dryers in terms of cost or savings. The conclusion is that the ASDaC machine is as effective as traditional methods. Recommendations include constructing larger volume machines that are quieter and powered by electricity or gasoline.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    23 views2 pages

    Chapter V: Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation

    Uploaded by

    Mpgmhl C John Lyndon
    This chapter summarizes the study which evaluated the Alternative Seed Dryer and Cleaner (ASDaC) machine. The ASDaC was found to have no significant differences compared to traditional solar seed drying in terms of acceptance by farmers or cost and savings. It was also found to have no significant differences compared to commercial seed dryers in terms of cost or savings. The conclusion is that the ASDaC machine is as effective as traditional methods. Recommendations include constructing larger volume machines that are quieter and powered by electricity or gasoline.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    CHAPTER V: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

    This chapter deals on the summary, conclusion and recommendation of the study.

    A. Summary

    This study was entitled “ASDaC (Alternative Seed Dryer and Cleaner)”. The ASDaC has

    the following major parts: drying area and the cleaning area and have a height of 55 inch and a

    maximum diameter of 110 inch and has a total weight of 150kg.

    Specifically, the researchers sought to know the significant difference between ASDaC

    and Traditional Solar Seed Drying in terms of the acceptance of the product; the capacity of the

    machine to dry and clean seeds; the efficiency of the machine; the life-span of the machine; the

    time consumed to dry and clean certain amount of seeds; and the cost analysis.

    The performance of the ASDaC was tested by different respondents who used the

    machine. This also shows the ratings of the respondents which ranges to 4-very satisfactory, 3-

    satisfactory, 2-good, 1-needs improvement.

    The mean of the ASDaC and commercial seed dryer were 3.7 and 3.9 respectively.

    Results revealed that there was no significant difference between the ASDaC and Traditional

    Solar Seed Drying in tems of their acceptance. The table also showed that there was no

    significant difference between the ASDaC and commercial seed dryer in terms of the cost or

    savings.

    Hypothesis test comparing two independent groups (t-test pooled variance) supported the

    findings in the acceptance and cost or savings of the machine.

    21
    B. Conclusion

    1. There is no significant difference between the ASDaC machine and traditional solar seed

    drying in terms of acceptance. Therefore these two variables are both accepted by the

    farmers.

    2. There is no significant difference between the ASDaC machine and traditional solar seed

    drying in terms of the cost or savings. Therefore these two variables are equal in terms of

    efficiency in saving energy and money.

    C. Recommendation

    Based on these observations, the following suggestions are recommended in the

    operations.

    1. Construct an ASDaC machine with a bigger volume for more jobs to be done

    2. Construct a drying machine that does not give off noise to the environment

    3. Construct a ASDaC machine using a motor powered by electricity or gasoline.

    Further, it is also recommended for the worker to wear safety clothing before operating

    the machine.

    22

    You might also like