Rubrics: Useful Assessment Tools
Rubrics: Useful Assessment Tools
Rubrics: Useful Assessment Tools
Rubrics can be excellent tools to use when assessing students’ work for several
reasons. You might consider developing and using rubrics if:
You find yourself re-writing the same comments on several different students’
assignments.
Your marking load is high, and writing out comments takes up a lot of your time.
Students repeatedly question you about the assignment requirements, even after
you’ve handed back the marked assignment.
You want to address the specific components of your marking scheme for
student and instructor use both prior to and following the assignment submission.
You find yourself wondering if you are grading or commenting equitably at the
beginning, middle, and end of a grading session.
You have a team of graders and wish to ensure validity and inter-rater reliability.
What is a rubric?
A rubric is an assessment tool that clearly indicates achievement criteria across all the
components of any kind of student work, from written to oral to visual. It can be used for
marking assignments, class participation, or overall grades. There are two types of
rubrics: holistic and analytical.
Holistic rubrics
Holistic rubrics group several different assessment criteria and classify them together
under grade headings or achievement levels.
For a sample participation rubric, see the Appendix of this teaching tip. Our Responding
to Writing Assignments teaching tip includes holistic rubrics specifically designed for
writing assignments. See also Facione and Facione's (1994) "Holistic Critical Thinking
Rubric [PDF]," useful in many disciplines.
Analytic rubrics
1. Decide what criteria or essential elements must be present in the student’s work
to ensure that it is high in quality. At this stage, you might even consider selecting
samples of exemplary student work that can be shown to students when setting
assignments.
2. Decide how many levels of achievement you will include on the rubric and how
they will relate to your institution's definition of grades as well as your own
grading scheme.
3. For each criterion, component, or essential element of quality, describe in detail
what the performance at each achievement level looks like.
4. Leave space for additional, tailored comments or overall impressions and a final
grade.
You can enhance students’ learning experience by involving them in the rubric
development process. Either as a class or in small groups, students decide upon criteria
for grading the assignment. It would be helpful to provide students with samples of
exemplary work so they could identify the criteria with greater ease. In such an activity,
the instructor functions as facilitator, guiding the students toward the final goal of a
rubric that can be used on their assignment. This activity not only results in a greater
learning experience, it also enables students to feel a greater sense of ownership and
inclusion in the decision making process.
Although this takes time in the beginning, you’ll find that rubrics can be changed slightly
or re-used later. If you are seeking pre-existing rubrics, consider Rhodes (2009) for the
AAC&U VALUE rubrics, cited below, or Facione and Facione (1994). Whether you
develop your own or use an existing rubric, practice with any other graders in your
course to achieve inter-rater reliability.
Be transparent
Give students a copy of the rubric when you assign the performance task. These are
not meant to be surprise criteria. Hand the rubric back with the assignment.
Require students to attach the rubric to the assignment when they hand it in. Some
instructors ask students to self-assess or give peer feedback using the rubric prior to
handing in the work.
Leverage rubrics to manage your time
When you mark the assignment, circle or highlight the achieved level of performance for
each criterion on the rubric. This is where you will save a great deal of time, as no
comments are required.
Include any additional specific or overall comments that do not fit within the rubric’s
criteria.
Decide upon a final grade for the assignment based on the rubric. If you find, as some
do, that presented work meets criteria on the rubric but nevertheless seems to have
exceeded or not met the overall qualities you’re seeking, revise the rubric accordingly
for the next time you teach the course. If the work achieves highly in some areas of the
rubric but not in others, decide in advance how the assignment grade is actually
derived. Some use a formula, or multiplier, to give different weightings to various
components; be explicit about this right on the rubric.