International Journal of

Environmental Research
and Public Health

Commentary
Breaking Up Sitting with Light-Intensity Physical
Activity: Implications for Shift-Workers
Grace E. Vincent * ID
, Sarah M. Jay, Corneel Vandelanotte and Sally A. Ferguson
School for Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Wayville 5034, Australia;
s.jay@cqu.edu.au (S.M.J.); c.vandelanotte@cqu.edu.au (C.V.); sally.ferguson@cqu.edu.au (S.A.F.)
* Correspondence: g.vincent@cqu.edu.au; Tel.: +61-478-019-526

Received: 24 August 2017; Accepted: 10 October 2017; Published: 16 October 2017

Abstract: Prolonged sitting, restricted sleep, and circadian disruption are all independent risk factors
for non-communicable diseases. Previous research has demonstrated that breaking up sitting with
light-intensity physical activity has clear benefits for the health of day workers, but these findings
may not apply in the presence of sleep restriction and/or circadian disruption—both of which are
commonly experienced by shift-workers. Specifically, sleep restriction, and circadian disruption result
in acute physiological changes that may offset the benefits of breaking up sitting. This commentary
will explore the potential benefits of breaking up sitting for health, work performance, and subsequent
sleep in shift-workers. Future areas of research designed to understand the mechanisms by which
prolonged sitting and shift work impact worker health and safety and to support the design of
effective occupational health and safety interventions are proposed.

Keywords: night-shift; non-communicable disease; sedentary behaviour; sitting breaks; shift-work

1. Introduction
Physical inactivity is the leading risk factor for a number of non-communicable diseases
(e.g., cancer, type 2 diabetes, and heart disease) [1] with an annual global economic burden
(health care, lost productivity) of approximately $67 billion [2]. It is estimated that up to 60% of
adults are insufficiently active for health [3]. To prevent non-communicable disease, most research
has traditionally focused on the potent and widespread benefits of engaging in moderate-to-vigorous
physical activity (MVPA). However, focusing exclusively on promoting MVPA, which at most accounts
for ~5% of time during the day, limits the potential to optimise health benefits of other daily activities,
such as those involving light-intensity physical activity (e.g., standing, slow walking), sitting, and sleep,
that make up ~95% of the day [4].
In the last decade, a substantial amount of evidence has demonstrated that time spent sitting
is associated with increased non-communicable disease risk [5,6] and all-cause mortality [7,8].
Importantly, the adverse health outcomes associated with prolonged sitting are independent of
habitual physical activity levels [9]. Therefore, those who are regularly engaged in MVPA but also
sit for prolonged periods may still be at increased risk of non-communicable disease [10]. To reduce
the adverse effects of prolonged sitting, research over the last five years has focused on breaking
up prolonged sitting at regular intervals (e.g., every 20–30 min) with short bursts (e.g., 2–3 min) of
light-intensity physical activity [11]. Studies have observed improvements in metabolic health [12],
self-reported fatigue [13], and reductions in all-cause mortality [14]. In addition, the simple transition
from a seated to a standing posture every 30 min across a work day reduces fatigue, lower back
discomfort, and maintains work productivity, compared to seated-only work [15]. The majority of this
research has been conducted in physically inactive, type 2 diabetic, or young habitually physically
active participants [11]. However, few studies have investigated the impact of breaking up sitting in
shift working populations [16], a population that is already at increased risk of chronic ill-health [17–19].

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1233; doi:10.3390/ijerph14101233 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1233 2 of 8

Shift work is defined as “work arrangements outside conventional daytime hours, and can include
fixed early morning, evening, and night work, as well as roster work and rotating three shift work” [17].
Nearly 20% of the Western workforce is currently involved in rotating shifts or night work, with the
prevalence of shift work arrangements predicted to increase [20]. Shift work is adversely associated
with numerous non-communicable diseases, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease,
coronary heart disease, stroke, and cancer [17–19]. While there is generally a poor understanding
of the mechanisms by which shift work leads to non-communicable disease [17], sleep restriction
and circadian disruption (commonly associated with shift work [21]) have both been implicated [17].
Contributing also to shift workers’ risk for ill-health may be time spent in occupational sedentary
behaviours. Sedentary behaviour is defined as any waking behaviour characterised by an energy
expenditure ≤1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs), while in a sitting, reclining, or lying posture [22],
(i.e., watching TV, using a computer, and sitting in cars). Compared to day workers, shift workers
spend comparable amounts of time engaged in both physical activity and sedentary behaviours during
leisure-time [23] but may spend up to 39.8% of time engaged in occupational sedentary behaviour
compared to 30.8% in day workers [23]. Further, compared to day workers, night shift workers spend
4.3% more time at work in uninterrupted sedentary periods of >30 min [23].
Given the complexities associated with shift worker ill-health compared to day workers and
the increased exposure to occupational sedentary behaviours, this commentary will explore the
appropriateness and relevance of breaking up sitting with light-intensity physical activity in shift
work environments. The effectiveness of breaking up sitting with physical activity in sleep-restricted
and/or circadian-disturbed individuals will be discussed. In addition, there are known consequences
of sleep restriction and circadian disruption for cognitive function [24,25] and accident and error
risk, [26–28]. These data, combined with evidence that physical activity can improve short-term
cognitive performance [13,29] and positively influence sleep [30], warrants a critical appraisal of
whether breaking up sitting with physical activity may benefit work performance and sleep, which
will follow. Finally, future research directions for investigating breaking up sitting in shift work
environments will be explored.

2. Are the Benefits of Breaking Up Sitting with Physical Activity as Effective in Sleep-Restricted
and/or Circadian-Disturbed Individuals?
Sleep restriction, circadian disruption, and prolonged sitting are all characteristic of shift work
arrangements and detrimental for shift workers’ health and safety [17,23,31]. Importantly, these factors
often occur in combination [23,32]. However, the problem for managing health and safety risks in
shift work settings is that mitigation strategies have largely been tested in isolation, rarely taking
into account the potential interaction effects of sleep restriction, circadian disruption, and prolonged
periods of sitting. For example, studies investigating breaking up sitting with physical activity [11,33]
have not tested individuals’ experiencing sleep and/or circadian disruption. This leaves a gap in our
understanding of the health benefits of breaking up sitting for shift workers experiencing circadian
disruption or sleep restriction.
Sleep restriction and circadian disruption in shift workers can be a consequence of work hours
(e.g., sleeping and waking at biologically inappropriate times, extended hours, overtime) or non-work
factors (e.g., illness, caring duties) [34]. The physiological desynchrony caused by circadian disruption
may mean that breaking up sitting with short bouts of physical activity does not have the same effect in
shift workers experiencing circadian disruption, as has been reported in those working during the day.
Further, while breaking up sitting with physical activity has been shown to be beneficial for reducing
the risk factors of non-communicable diseases [35], studies have not controlled or reported prior sleep
duration [11,33]. This is important, as short sleep duration is associated with negative changes to
the same metabolic and inflammatory markers that are positively influenced by breaking up sitting.
As such, it is possible that short sleep durations may attenuate the positive impacts of breaking up
prolonged sitting [36]. Therefore, more physical activity during breaks may be required (either longer
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1233 3 of 8

durations of physical activity and/or higher intensity, e.g., MVPA rather than light-intensity physical
activity) to get the same effect on physiological parameters in shift workers.

3. Can Breaking Up Sitting with Physical Activity Improve Shift Workers’ Performance
and Sleep?
Sleep restriction and circadian disruption increases sleepiness, reduces alertness, and is
a risk factor for impaired cognitive performance, and increased likelihood of accidents [12,28–30].
Sleep restriction impairs many aspects of work performance, including motor skills, concentration,
memory, and learning [37]. In addition, declines in cognitive performance can lead to higher rates of
fatigue-related errors and accidents. The risk of occupational accidents is up to 60% higher for non-day
shift workers [26,27]. Road and workplace accidents related to excessive sleepiness, to which shift
work is a significant contributor, are estimated to cost up to $93 billion per annum in the United States,
and fatigue is believed to contribute to 20% of road accidents in Australia [27]. Sleep restriction also
leads to adverse behavioural outcomes such as irritability, negative mood, reduced communication,
and ability to cope with work demands [38]. Further, decision-making ability declines and risk-taking
behaviours increase [39,40]. It is also of concern that sleep-restricted individuals may not be aware of
their own cognitive performance declines [24]. Management of health and safety risks associated with
the consequences of shift work remains a significant challenge for industry, regulators, and individuals.
Task rotation and in-shift breaks are established risk management controls, and are prescribed
as part of fatigue risk management policies, to mitigate against cognitive performance impairment
and reduced alertness in shift workers [41]. While the benefits for alertness and work performance of
in-shift breaks are well known, research has focused on the length of break or inclusion of a nap [18],
but the underlying mechanisms that explain these benefits are not well understood. For example,
very little is known about what aspect of a rest break contributes to improving work performance and
alertness (e.g., cognitive rest, sleep, and physical activity). Beneficial effects of exercise on cognitive
performance have been observed following a single bout of exercise [29] and a recent pilot study
found breaking up sitting may be an effective acute fatigue countermeasure [13], suggesting that at
least light-intensity physical activity may mediate pathways involved in mental fatigue and cognition.
Further research is needed to determine whether breaking up sitting with physical activity benefits
performance in the workplace.
Epidemiological studies have shown that exercise is consistently associated with better sleep,
across many demographics [42,43]. Further, experimental studies highlight that acute and regular
exercise is associated with improvements in sleep [30]. Possible mechanisms by which exercise
improves sleep include increases in growth hormone and mood, as well as decreases in insulin
resistance, vagal activity and inflammation [30]. Further, the rapid decline in core body temperature
following exercise increases the likelihood of sleep onset and may facilitate entry into deeper sleep
stages [44]. In addition, day time exercise is frequently included into standard sleep hygiene
practices [45]. However, the impacts of prolonged sitting and breaking up sitting on sleep outcomes are
unclear. A recent study observed improvements in subjective but not objective sleep quality measures
in hypertensive adults that used sit–stand desks compared to those who were continuously seated [46].
Therefore, further studies are needed to explore whether breaking up sitting with physical activity has
beneficial effects for subsequent sleep.

4. Benefits of Future Research Investigating Breaking Up Sitting in Shift Workers

Prolonged sitting, sleep restriction, and circadian disruption are workplace health and safety
hazards. Mitigating the risks of these hazards requires an understanding of the underlying mechanisms
impacting health and safety outcomes, in order to design and test appropriate control measures.
In isolation, these hazards are quite well understood [11,12], but to date they have not been studied in
combination in controlled settings. The proliferation of standing desks, treadmill work stations and
walking meetings in many workplaces is a testament to a growing emphasis on increasing physical
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1233 4 of 8

activity to manage the work health and safety risks associated with sitting. However, mechanisms by
which breaking up sitting with physical activity mitigates risk in day workers may not be the same in
workers who experience sleep restriction and circadian disruption such as shift workers. Therefore,
it is timely to investigate whether these factors impact the health strategies associated with breaking
up sitting.
Research is needed to determine how aspects of shift work interact with breaking up sitting,
and whether breaking up sitting strategies could also be beneficial to shift workers in terms of work
performance and safety. To test this, experimental studies are needed to contribute foundational
knowledge about the underlying mechanisms by which breaking up sitting impacts physiological
markers and work performance in sleep and circadian-disrupted individuals. One example is testing
the optimal length of break and intensity of physical activity required to benefit health, in shift working
and non-shift working populations. Future studies could also determine the health and performance
impacts of different combinations of activity (e.g., sedentary versus active) and sleep (e.g., 5-h versus
9-h sleep opportunities).
New knowledge generated from experimental studies will contribute to the evidence base on
which tailored and effective workplace interventions can be designed and tested. Translation to
systems of work that better support the health of shift workers who sit and do not get sufficient sleep
are needed [47]. For example, infrastructure that increases physical activity (e.g., treadmill desks)
could be implemented at work, combined with improved sleep hygiene in the home (e.g., blackout
curtains for night shift workers sleeping during the day). Previous research has demonstrated that
workplace interventions have typically focused on reducing sitting time and increasing work standing
time [48]. While small improvements in biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk following such workplace
interventions have been observed [49], the potential benefits for workers at high risk for cardiovascular
disease (e.g., shift workers) may be greater. Flexible work environments that support sit–stand–physical
activity transitions should be provided, given that excessive standing is also associated with increased
cardiometabolic risk [50]. The potential impacts of effective interventions on workplaces and the
broader economy are wide-reaching and may include improved productivity and reduced rates of
absenteeism or presenteeism. However, further research is needed to examine to what extent these
benefits ensue and whether workplaces are supportive of creating environments that allow reductions
in sitting time. Existing evidence indicates that low-cost approaches to reduce workplace sitting are
perceived to be feasible, but other factors such as work demands and organisational social contexts
may act as barriers [51]. Therefore, it is recommended that building a supportive organisational culture
and raising awareness of the adverse health effects of prolonged sitting are essential for improving
individual level and organisation-level behaviour change [51].
Measurement of sleep, sitting breaks, and physical activity should be standardised to ensure
a consistent approach to research and comparability between studies [47]. In laboratory settings,
polysomnography, the gold standard measure of sleep, integrates measures of brain activity,
eye movement, muscle activity, and cardiac activity, to identify sleep and wake, as well as, individual
sleep stages [52]. Activity monitoring (actigraphy, accelerometry) provides an objective, non-invasive
practical free-living alternative to polysomnography [53]. Activity monitors indirectly assess
sleep by sensing motor activity at the wrist and use valid algorithms to distinguish sleep from
wakefulness [54,55]. These devices are useful for collecting data continuously for long periods of time
and can permit concurrent measurement of sedentary behaviour and physical activity [56]. However,
to measure sit–stand transitions or brief sitting breaks, devices that include an inclinometer and worn
on the thigh may be more valid [57]. Clear reporting of activity monitor data (e.g., type, intensity,
location) is crucial in the evaluation and replication of experimental and intervention studies [58].
In workplaces, commercially available sleep and activity trackers (e.g., Garmin) could be provided to
monitor worker behaviour in real time.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1233 5 of 8

5. Conclusions
Time spent sitting, sleep restriction, and circadian disruption are all independent risk factors
for non-communicable diseases. However, we understand very little about how these risk factors
interact with one another. Furthermore, sleep restriction and circadian disruption also impact on
alertness and work-related performance and safety, with significant associated costs. It is possible that
in-shift breaks that involve breaking up sitting with physical activity may have considerable benefits
for health, work performance, and sleep of shift workers. Therefore, understanding the combined
impact of these behaviours on non-communicable disease risk, as well as how breaking up sitting with
physical activity may influence other aspects of worker health and safety (e.g., cognitive performance,
sleep) is critical. In order to design appropriate risk mitigation strategies for prolonged sitting in shift
workers, both foundational experimental studies and interventions aimed at designing work patterns
and practice are needed to alleviate the health and safety burden on shift workers worldwide.

Acknowledgments: Grace E. Vincent is supported by an Early Career Fellowship at CQUniversity.

Corneel Vandelanotte is supported by a Future Leader Fellowship funded by the National Heart Foundation of
Australia (ID 100427).
Author Contributions: Grace E. Vincent and Sally A. Ferguson wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Sarah M. Jay
and Corneel Vandelanotte critically evaluated the first draft of the manuscript and assisted in writing the
final version.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Blair, S.N. Physical inactivity: The biggest public health problem of the 21st century. Br. J. Sports Med. 2009,
43, 1–2. [PubMed]
2. Ding, D.; Lawson, K.D.; Kolbe-Alexander, T.L.; Finkelstein, E.A.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; van Mechelen, W.;
Pratt, M. The economic burden of physical inactivity: A global analysis of major non-comunicable disease.
Lancet 2016, 388, 1311–1324. [CrossRef]
3. Hallal, P.C.; Andersen, L.B.; Bull, F.C.; Guthold, R.; Haskell, W.; Ekelund, U.; Lancet Physical Activity Series
Working Group. Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012,
380, 247–257. [CrossRef]
4. Chaput, J.P.; Carson, V.; Gray, C.E.; Tremblay, M.S. Importance of all movement behaviors in a 24 hour period
for overall health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 12575–12581. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Hamilton, M.T.; Hamilton, D.G.; Zderic, T.W. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity,
metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes 2007, 56, 2655–2667. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
6. Schmid, S.M.; Hallschmid, M.; Schultes, B. The metabolic burden of sleep loss. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.
2015, 3, 52–62. [CrossRef]
7. Grunseit, A.C.; Chau, J.Y.; Rangul, V.; Holmen, T.L.; Bauman, A. Patterns of sitting and mortality in the
Nord-Trondelag health studey (HUNT). Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017, 14, 14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Cappuccio, F.P.; D’Elia, L.; Strazzullo, P.; Miller, M.A. Sleep duration and all-cause mortality: A systematic
review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep 2010, 33, 585–592. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Owen, N.; Healy, G.N.; Matthews, C.E.; Dunstan, D.W. Too much sitting: The population-health science of
sedentary behavior. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2010, 38, 105–113. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Thorp, A.A.; Owen, N.; Neuhaus, M.; Dunstan, D.W. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes
in adults: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011, 41, 207–215. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
11. Benatti, F.B.; Ried-Larsen, M. The Effects of Breaking up Prolonged Sitting Time: A Review of Experimental
Studies. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015, 47, 2053–2061. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Chastin, S.F.; Palarea-Albaladejo, J.; Dontje, M.L.; Skelton, D.A. Combined effects of time spent in
physical activity, sedentary behaviors and sleep on obesity and cardio-metabolic health markers: A novel
compositional data analysis approach. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1233 6 of 8

13. Wennberg, P.; Boraxbekk, C.J.; Wheeler, M.; Howard, B.; Dempsey, P.C.; Lambert, G.; Eikelis, N.; Larsen, R.;
Sethi, P.; Occleston, J. Acute effects of breaking up prolonged sitting on fatigue and cognition: A pilot study.
BMJ Open 2016, 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Wilmot, E.G.; Edwardson, C.L.; Achana, F.A.; Davies, M.J.; Gorely, T.; Gray, L.J.; Khunti, K.; Yates, T.;
Biddle, S.J. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death:
Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 2895–2905. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Thorp, A.A.; Kingwell, B.A.; Owen, N.; Dunstan, D.W. Breaking up workplace sitting time with intermittent
standing bouts improves fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in overweight/obese office workers.
Occup. Environ. Med. 2014, 71, 765–771. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Jalayondeja, C.; Jalayondeja, W.; Mekhora, K.; Bhuanantanondh, P.; Dusadi-Isariyavong, A.; Upiriyasakul, R.
Break in Sedentary Behavior Reduces the Risk of Noncommunicable Diseases and Cardiometabolic Risk
Factors among Workers in a Petroleum Company. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
17. Kecklund, G.; Axelsson, J. Health consequences of shift work and insufficient sleep. BMJ 2016, 355. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
18. Hansen, A.B.; Stayner, L.; Hansen, J.; Andersen, Z.J. Night shift work and incidence of diabetes in the Danish
Nurse Cohort. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016, 73, 262–268. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Haus, E.L.; Smolensky, M.H. Shift work and cancer risk: Potential mechanistic roles of circadian disruption,
light at night, and sleep deprivation. Sleep Med. Rev. 2013, 17, 273–284. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Kivimäki, M.; Batty, G.D.; Hublin, C. Shift work as a risk factor for future type 2 diabetes: Evidence,
mechanisms, implications, and future research directions. PLoS Med. 2011, 8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Sallinen, M.; Kecklund, G. Shift work, sleep, and sleepiness—Differences between shift schedules and
systems. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2010, 121–133. [CrossRef]
22. Barnes, J.; Behrens, T.K.; Benden, M.E.; Biddle, S.; Bond, D.; Brassard, P.; Brown, H.; Carr, L.; Chaput, J.P.;
Christian, H. Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”.
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 37, 540–542. [CrossRef]
23. Hulsegge, G.; Gupta, N.; Holtermann, A.; Jørgensen, M.B.; Proper, K.I.; van der Beek, A.J. Shift workers have
similar leisure-time physical activity levels as day workers but are more sedentary at work. Scand. J. Work
Environ. Health 2017, 43, 127–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Van Dongen, H.P.A.; Maislin, G.; Mullington, J.M.; Dinges, D.F. The cumulative cost of additional
wakefulness: Dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep
restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep 2003, 26, 117–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Belenky, G.; Wesensten, N.J.; Thorne, D.R.; Thomas, M.L.; Sing, H.C.; Redmond, D.P.; Russo, M.B.; Balkin, T.J.
Patterns of performance degradation and restoration during sleep restriction and subsequent recovery:
A sleep dose-response study. J. Sleep Res. 2003, 12, 1–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Rajaratnam, S.M.W.; Arendt, J. Health in a 24-h society. Lancet 2001, 358, 999–1005. [CrossRef]
27. Rajaratnam, S.M.W.; Howard, M.E.; Grunstein, R.R. Sleep loss and circadian disruption in shift work:
Health burden and management. Med. J. Aust. 2013, 199, S11–S15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Akerstedt, T. Work hours, sleepiness and accidents. Introduction and summary. J. Sleep Res. 1995, 4, 1–3.
[CrossRef]
29. Chang, Y.K.; Chu, C.H.; Wang, C.C.; Wang, Y.C.; Song, T.F.; Tsai, C.L.; Etnier, J.L. Dose-response relation
between exercise duration and cognition. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015, 47, 159–165. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Chennaoui, M.; Arnal, P.J.; Sauvet, F.; Léger, D. Sleep and exercise: A reciprocal issue? Sleep Med. Rev. 2015,
20, 59–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Lockley, S.W.; Barger, L.K.; Ayas, N.T.; Rothschild, J.M.; Czeisler, C.A.; Landrigan, C.P. Effects of health care
provider work hours and sleep deprivation on safety and performance. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 2007,
33, 7–18. [CrossRef]
32. Folkard, S.; Lombardi, D.A.; Tucker, P.T. Shiftwork: Safety, sleepiness and sleep. Ind. Health 2005, 43, 20–23.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Chastin, S.F.; Egerton, T.; Leask, C.; Stamatakis, E. Meta-analysis of the relationship between breaks in
sedentary behavior and cardiometabolic health. Obesity 2015, 23, 1800–1810. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Ferguson, S.A.; Paech, G.M.; Sargent, C.; Darwent, D.; Kennaway, D.J.; Roach, G.D. The influence of circadian
time and sleep dose on subjective fatigue ratings. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2012, 45, 50–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1233 7 of 8

35. Bauman, A.E.; Chau, J.Y.; Ding, D.; Bennie, J. Too much sitting and cardio-metabolic risk: An update of
epidemiological evidence. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 2013, 7, 293–298. [CrossRef]
36. Vincent, G.E.; Jay, S.M.; Sargent, C.; Kovac, K.; Vandelanotte, C.; Ridgers, N.D.; Ferguson, S.A. The impact
of breaking up prolonged sitting on glucose metabolism and cognitive function when sleep is restricted.
Neurobiol. Sleep Circadian Rhythms 2017. [CrossRef]
37. Goel, N.; Rao, H.; Durmer, J.S.; Dinges, D.F. Neurocognitive Consequences of Sleep Deprivation. Semin Neurol.
2009, 29, 320–339. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Banks, S.; Dinges, D.F. Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. J. Clin. Sleep Med.
2007, 3, 519–528. [PubMed]
39. Killgore, W.; Balkin, T.J.; Wesensten, N.J. Impaired decision-making following 49 h of sleep deprivation.
J. Sleep Res. 2006, 15, 7–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Killgore, W.D.; Grugle, N.L.; Balkin, T.J. Gambling when sleep deprived: Don‘t bet on stimulants.
Chronobiol. Int. 2012, 29, 43–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. Tucker, P.; Folkard, S.; Macdonald, I. Rest breaks and accident risk. Lancet 2003, 361. [CrossRef]
42. Buman, M.P.; Phillips, B.A.; Youngstedt, S.D.; Kline, C.E.; Hirshkowitz, M. Does nighttime exercise really
disturb sleep? Results from the 2013 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll. Sleep Med. 2014, 15,
755–761. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Youngstedt, S.D.; Kline, C.E. Epidemiology of exercise and sleep. Sleep Biol. Rhythms 2006, 4, 215–221.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Gilbert, S.S.; van den Heuvel, C.J.; Ferguson, S.A.; Dawson, D. Thermoregulation as a sleep signalling system.
Sleep Med. Rev. 2004, 8, 81–93. [CrossRef]
45. Stepanski, E.J.; Wyatt, J.K. Use of sleep hygiene in the treatment of insomnia. Sleep Med. Rev. 2003, 7, 215–225.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Kline, C.E.; Kowalsky, R.J.; Perdomo, S.J.; Gibbs, B.B. Use of a Sit-Stand Desk Reduces Wake Time During
the Subsequent Night’s Sleep: 3017 Board #6 June 23. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2017, 49, 854–855.
47. Chau, J.Y.; van der Ploeg, H.P.; Van Uffelen, J.G.; Wong, J.; Riphagen, I.; Healy, G.N.; Gilson, N.D.;
Dunstan, D.W.; Bauman, A.E.; Owen, N. Are workplace interventions to reduce sitting effective? A systematic
review. Prev. Med. 2010, 51, 352–356. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Li, I.; Mackey, M.G.; Foley, B.; Pappas, E.; Edwards, K.; Chau, J.Y.; Engelen, L.; Voukelatos, A.; Whelan, A.;
Bauman, A. Reducing Office Workers’ Sitting Time at Work Using Sit-Stand Protocols: Results From a Pilot
Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2017, 59, 543–549. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Healy, G.N.; Winkler, E.A.; Eakin, E.G.; Owen, N.; Lamontagne, A.D.; Moodie, M.; Dunstan, D.W. A cluster
RCT to reduce workers’ sitting time: Impact on cardiometabolic biomarkers. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2017, 49,
2032–2039. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Smith, P.; Ma, H.; Glazier, R.H.; Gilbert-Ouimet, M.; Mustard, C. The Relationship Between Occupational
Standing and Sitting and Incident Heart Disease Over a 12-Year Period in Ontario, Canada. Am. J. Epidemiol.
2017. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Hadgraft, N.T.; Brakenridge, C.L.; LaMontagne, A.D.; Fjeldsoe, B.S.; Lynch, B.M.; Dunstan, D.W.; Owen, N.;
Healy, G.N.; Lawler, S.P. Feasibility and acceptability of reducing workplace sitting time: A qualitative study
with Australian office workers. BMC Public Health 2016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Iber, C.; Ancoli-Israel, S.; Chesson, A.; Quan, S.F. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated
Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications, 1st ed.; The American Academy of Sleep Medicine:
Westchester, IL, USA, 2007.
53. Morgenthaler, T.; Alessi, C.; Friedman, L.; Owens, J.; Kapur, V.; Boehlecke, B.; Brown, T.; Chesson, A.;
Coleman, J.; Lee-Chiong, T. Standards of Practice Committee; American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the assessment of sleep and sleep disorders: An update for
2007. Sleep 2007, 30, 519–529. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Marino, M.; Li, Y.; Rueschman, M.N.; Winkelman, J.; Ellenbogen, J.; Solet, J.; Dulin, H.; Berkman, L.F.;
Buxton, O.M. Measuring sleep: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of wrist actigraphy compared to
polysomnography. Sleep 2013, 36, 1747–1755. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Ancoli-Israel, S.; Cole, R.; Alessi, C.; Chambers, M.; Moorcroft, W.; Pollak, C. The role of actigraphy in the
study of sleep and circadian rhythms. American Academy of Sleep Medicine Review Paper. Sleep 2003, 26,
342–392. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1233 8 of 8

56. Weiss, A.R.; Johnson, N.L.; Berger, N.A.; Redline, S. Validity of activity-based devices to estimate sleep.
J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2010, 6, 336–342. [PubMed]
57. Grant, P.M.; Ryan, C.G.; Tigbe, W.W.; Granat, M.H. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the
measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br. J. Sports Med. 2006, 40, 992–997.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Montoye, A.H.; Moore, R.W.; Bowles, H.R.; Korycinski, R.; Pfeiffer, K.A. Reporting accelerometer methods
in physical activity intervention studies: A systematic review and recommendations for authors. Br. J.
Sports Med. 2016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).