Design of Segmental Tunnel Linings - 2010-Ho
Design of Segmental Tunnel Linings - 2010-Ho
Design of Segmental Tunnel Linings - 2010-Ho
TUNNEL LININGS
SEGMENTAL LININGS
• Usually used in conjunction with shield
machines
• Used for the majority of the MRT and
DTSS tunnels
• The MRT tunnels have ‘one-pass’ lining
systems
• The DTSS tunnels have two pass linings,
an initial segmental lining, and an inner
lining to allow protection from the corrosive
sewage
SEGMENTAL LININGS
• Modern linings are generally of reinforced
concrete
Other materials used:
• Spheroidal graphite iron (modern
development of cast iron) – high flexibility,
high resistance to corrosion, high cost
• Steel
• Steel & plastic fibre reinforced concrete
(the way of the future?)
CONCRETE SEGMENTS
Staggered key/joints –
gives more rigidity
Key
Top Top
Circumferential joint
Longitudinal (or radial) joint
LINING DESIGN FOR CCL 2 & 3
General Arrangement
– Internal diameter: 5.8m
– Thickness: 275mm, Length: 1.4m
– 5 segments (67.5o) + key (22.5o)
– Radial joints to be staggered, i.e. to
avoid cruciform joints
– Curved bolts of 24mm diameter in bolt
holes of 34 mm diameter (straight bolts
being used for CCL 4 and 5)
SOIL LOADS ON RING
GROUND LOADS
ph = K x pv
so pd = ((1-K)/2) x pv
Total load = Uniform load + distortional load + water load
VALUES FOR K FOR SINGAPORE
LTA Design Criteria (based on
measurement, back-calculation)
• E,M, F2 0.75
• B,O,G4,F1 0.5
• S4 0.4
• S2, S3 (FCBB), G2 0.3
? Not sure how much these values reflect true ‘Ko’,
how much they are influenced by construction?
Symbol Description
ro radius to extrados of tunnel lining
γ average unit weight of overburden
k constant
ν12)
Young's modulus for lining ( replaced by E/(1-ν
E where lining continuous along tunnel)
Ec, ν Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of ground
second moment of inertia of lining per unit
I length of tunnel
Ie effective value of I for a jointed lining
Ij effective value of I at joint in a lining
ratio of radius of lining centroid to that of
η extrados
hw water table from ground surface
Based on Muir Wood (1975) and Curtis
(1976), moments and forces can be
calculated as:
Deflection, u1 = ro4(2Sn+St)cos2θ
θ/18EI
Normal Force, N = ro (Sn+2St)cos2θ θ/3 +
pwro + No
Q2 = Ecro3/12EI(1+ν
ν)
No = σv'(1+k)ro/(2+(1-k)(2-2ν
ν)Ecro/EA(1-
2νν)(1+νν))
Muir Wood/Curtis (cont.)
No effect on lining
Stiffness – joints at
points of
contraflexure
FOUR JOINTS IN LINING
- EFFECT ON MOMENTS 2
Significant
Reduction in
Stiffness and
therefore moment
EFFECT OF JOINTS
• If more than 4 joints, then the lining will
always be less stiff than an unjointed
lining. Use formula from Muir Wood:
Il = Ij + (4/n) 2 I
Where: Il is moment of inertia of jointed lining
Ij is the moment of inertia of the joint
n is the number of joints (if >4)
I is the moment of inertia of the unjointed lining
EFFECT OF JOINTS
• More joints means more flexibility, which
means larger deflection, but less moment
• Linings often designed allowing for joints
to calculate maximum deflection (worst
case), but no joints to calculate maximum
moment (also worst case)
SEGMENT DESIGN – TREAT AS
SHORT COLUMN
M
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF
JOINTS
THREE METHODS OF FORMING
JOINTS
CASTING & CONSTRUCION
TOLERANCES – EFFECT ON JOINTS
Block joint – small rotation causes load to be thrown into side of block
ROTATION AT JOINT
ECCENTRICITY DUE TO STEP
Ft = 0.45√Fcu/Load factor
1. Full restraint of
reinforcement
2. Use of fire protection
boards
3. Use of polypropylene
fibres, added to
concrete mix – in a fire
these melt, letting out
the steam that otherwise
causes explosive
spalling
DURABILITY &
WATERTIGHTNESS
CONCENTRATION OF SALT DUE TO WATER
LEAKAGE INTO TRANSIT TUNNEL
WATERPROOFING THE
SEGMENT
• Use low permeability concrete – good mix
design, aggregate selection, additives
(such as silica fume)
• Apply waterproofing compound, such as
epoxy paint
Coated segments for
CCL 4
CONCRETE SEGMENTS
Rapid reduction in sealing capacity with gap size- particularly in salt water
FORCE/COMPRESSION OF
HYDROPHILIC GASKET
Co-extruded EPDM and hydroswelling gasket
as used on Circle line,
only single gasket required
Single gasket allows wider gasket to be used
– greater tolerance for steps
SINGLE VS DOUBLE GASKET
Advantages:
• Solo EPDM can be a problem at corners –
hydroswelling will seal if on EPDM carrier
• Solo, low hydroswelling, cannot seal if there is a
gap due to build tolerances, joint rotation
• Solo, high hydroswelling suffer large loss of
swelling with time
• Can use wider gasket if only one – can cope with
larger build tolerances
Disadvantage:
• Only one line of defence - if gasket is damaged
GASKET TESTING
• Testing should be specified by designer
• Typically, test pressure to be resisted is
twice maximum current water pressure –
to allow for aging of gaskets
• Test step (offset of gaskets) usually higher
than maximum specified step in
construction tolerances
TESTING FOR C824
ACHIEVING DURABILITY
• High strength, low permeability concrete
• Crack width control (0.2mm normal case,
0.3mm considering future developments)
• Coating to reduce permeability further
(used to be coal tar epoxy, now using a
curing compound)
• Joints - Good gaskets, good build, good
grout
• Grout holes – swelling gasket on plug
WATERPROOF LININGS
• Minimise water flow into tunnel
(consolidation settlements, size of sumps
and pumps)
• Most importantly, needed for durability of
reinforced concrete lining
• Need to consider both cracks in concrete
and watertightness of joints – typically
20km of joint/km of MRT tunnel
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
• Future developments tend to cluster
around infrastructure hubs
• Infrastructure tunnels should make some
allowance for future development
• LTA tunnels designed for additional 15mm
distortion on diameter
• Done by calculating additional moment
from added distortion
DAMAGED AND LEAKING LININGS
Segment cracked
right through, due to
bending failure.
Crack should be
epoxy grouted, but
will be long term
maintenance problem
DAMAGE DUE TO SHOVING –
CIRCLE LINE 1
LATERAL BENDING LOADS
CAUSED BY POOR BUILD