Emancipation Patent

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

P.D. No.

27 provides that “title to land acquired pursuant to this Decree or the


Land Reform Program of the Government shall not be transferable except by hereditary
succession or to the Government in accordance with the provisions of this Decree, the
Code of Agrarian Reforms and other existing laws and regulations.”
Awarded lands covered by Emancipation Patents (EPs), undoubtedly, can be the
subject of a contract of sale. As elucidated by the Supreme court in the Case of
Engracia Vinzons-Magana vs. Hon. Conrado Estrella, et. Al. 201 SCRA 536, the
issuance of Emancipation patent (upon compliance with the prescribed conditions under
P.D. 27) confers on the farmer-grantee a vested right of absolute ownership in the
landholding—a right which has become fixed and established and is no longer open to
doubt and controversy. Thus, Emancipation Patent is a proof of ownership which can be
the subject of a contract of sale in the exercise of one’s right of ownership without
violating the prohibitions embodied in Section 27 of R.A. No. 6657 (Comprehensive
Agrarian Reform Law) relative to sale or disposition of awarded lands for a period of ten
(10) years from their ward because said provision of law solely applies to awarded lands
under R.A. No. 6657 covered by Certificates of Land Ownership Award (CLOAs) and
not to PD 27 lands covered by EPs.

It must be recalled at this point that in a petition for the issuance of a new
owner’s duplicate copy of a certificate of title in lieu of one allegedly lost, the RTC,
acting only as a land registration court, has no jurisdiction to pass upon the question of
actual ownership of the land covered by the lost owner’s duplicate copy of the certificate
of title. (Camitan v. Fidelity Investment Corporation citing Macabalo-Bravo v. Macabalo,
G.R. No. 144099, September 26, 2005, 471 SCRA 60, 72) The only fact that had to be
established was whether or not the original owner’s duplicate copy of certificate of title is
still in existence. (Macabalo-Bravo v. Macabalo, G.R. No. 144099, September 26, 2005,
471 SCRA 60, 72) Thus, any issue of ownership as well as the validity of the Deed of
Absolute Sale upon which ownership relies will have to be threshed out in a more
appropriate proceeding where the trial court will conduct a full-blown hearing with the
parties presenting their respective evidence to prove ownership over the subject
property and not in an action for the issuance of the lost owner’s duplicate certificate of
title, nor in a proceeding to annul the certificate issued in consequence thereof. (Strait
Times v. Court of Appeals, 294 SCRA 714)

P.D. 1529 Section 105. Certificates of Land Transfer Emancipation Patents.


In case of subsequent transfer of property covered by an Emancipation Patent or
a Certificate of Title emanating from an Emancipation Patent, the Register of Deeds
shall affect the transfer only upon receipt of the supporting papers from the Department
of Agrarian Reform

You might also like