The Big Secret Is Your CITIZENSHIP
The Big Secret Is Your CITIZENSHIP
The Big Secret Is Your CITIZENSHIP
by Christopher Ripple
The U.S. in this case, is the federal corporation the District of Columbia, also known
as USDC or the UNITED STATES. It was created by the congressional act of 1871 .
Also see 28 USC 3002 (15) “United States” means — (A) a Federal corporation;
See case law…. “The idea prevails with some, indeed it has expression in arguments at
the bar, that we have in this country substantially two national governments ; one to be
maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained
by Congress outside and independently of that instrument , by exercising such powers as
other nations of the earth are accustomed to… I take leave to say that, if the principles
thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical
and mischievous change in our system will result. We will, in that event, pass from the
era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era
of legislative absolutism… It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a
government outside the Supreme Law of the Land finds lodgment in our Constitutional
Jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to
prevent all violation of the principles of the Constitution.” — Honorable Supreme Court
Justice John Harlan in the 1901 case of Downes v. Bidwell.
See case law… “Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens.” Belmont v. Town of Gulfport,
122 So. 10. U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) “The term resident and citizen of the
United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the
former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.”
“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of
each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others ,
and each has citizens of it’s own …” United States v. Cruikshank , 92 U.S. 542 (1875) “…he
was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,…” “One
may be a citizen of a State an yet not a citizen of the United States”. McDonel v. The
State , 90 Ind. 320 (1883) “That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship
of a state,…” Tashiro v. Jordan , 201 Cal. 236 (1927) “A citizen of the United States is a
citizen of the federal government …” Kitchens v. Steele , 112 F.Supp 383
“Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens.” Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10.
State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: “the term ‘ citizen ‘ in the United States, is analogous to the
term `subject’ in common law ; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in
government.”
Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226: “The privileges and immunities clause
of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill
of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only
those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect
those rights which relate to state citizenship .” Supreme Court: US vs. Va lentine 288 F.
Supp. 957: “The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to
residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States.”
The Amendment (14th) recognized that “an individual can be a Citizen of one of the
several states without being a citizen of the United States,” (U.S. v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas.
829, 830), or, “a citizen of the United States without being a Citizen of a state.” (Slaughter
– House Cases, supra; cf. U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 549 (1875)). A more recent case
is Crosse v. Bd. of Supervisors, 221 A.2d 431 (1966) which says : “Both before and after
the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a
person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state.” Citing U.S.
v. Cruikshank, supra.
The courts presume you to be a federal citizen, without even telling you that
there are different classes of citizens. It is up to you dispute this. Use your
passport and the actual birth certificate. See…
“Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the
right to inquire and determine a tax liability.” U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182
(1982).
“There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one
of the United States and one of the state”. Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson
County , 160 Ala. 155; 48 So. 788 (1909)
“The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct
from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those
which he has under the other”. Colgate v. Harvey , 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 ( 1935)
“There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the ci tizens of the
United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as
such”. Ruhstrat v. People , 57 N.E. 41 (1900)
“Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as
property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity “”, Wheeling
Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773
“…the first eight amendments have uniformly been held not to be protected from state
action by the privilege and immunities clause [of the 14th Amendment].” Hague v. CIO ,
307 US 496, 520
“The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment…and the right
to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment…have been distinctly held not to be
privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th
Amendment…and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee
against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th
Amendment…and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in
the 6th Amendment…it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th
Amendment, and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, were not privileges
and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the 14th
Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self –
incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this
clause of the 14th Amendment.” Twining v. New Jersey , 21 1 US 78, 98 – 99
“The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee
an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the
regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the Unite d
States.” W. W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S.
452
“A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate
commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common – law right to travel, of a Citizen
of one of the several states .” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610 – 625. (1914)
There ARE ways to remedy your citizenship….. more to come and please read some
Judge Anna von Reitz, Judge David Wynn Miller, Karl Lentz to name a few…. Ask
questions and feel the power you take back as you become once again a member
of WE THE PEOPLE…