2006 Webcentral NetRegistry
2006 Webcentral NetRegistry
2006 Webcentral NetRegistry
The Manager
Company Announcements Office
Australian Stock Exchange Limited
Level 4, Exchange Centre
20 Bridge Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000
Dear Sir
Yours faithfully,
Nicola Seaton
Company Secretary
17 August 2006
Dear Shareholder
Dear Shareholders
If you have any queries about this information or about your proxy, please contact the
shareholder telephone information line on:
Yours faithfully,
Nicola Seaton
Company Secretary
16 August 2006
The Manager
Company Announcements Office
Australian Stock Exchange Limited
Level 4, Exchange Centre
20 Bridge Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000
Dear Sir
For the reasons set out below however, the board of WebCentral has determined that
its shareholders’ interests would be better served by continuing to pursue the well
advanced proposed merger with Melbourne IT. NetRegistry’s proposal does not
constitute an offer by NetRegistry for WebCentral shares. The proposal is relatively
complex, involving a number of separate but inter-conditional transactions:
(b) Offers by WebCentral to buy back up to 100% of its shares on completion, and
again 9 months after completion;
The proposal is conditional and at an early stage of development. It does not at this
point represent an offer capable of acceptance by WebCentral. Conditions of
NetRegistry’s proposal include securing committed equity and debt financing for the
transaction.
The directors of WebCentral have considered the proposal and received advice from
Deutsche Bank, financial advisers to the company, and Addisons, legal advisers to the
company. They do not believe the conditions of the proposal could be satisfied or the
proposal developed into an offer capable of acceptance prior to the scheme meeting to
approve Melbourne IT’s offer on 21 August 2006. Pursuit of NetRegistry’s proposal
would therefore jeopardise the proposed merger with Melbourne IT and involve an
obligation to pay Melbourne IT a break fee of $600,000. There would be no certainty
that Melbourne IT would be willing to make an offer on the same terms or at all if
NetRegistry’s proposal was withdrawn or could not be completed. On this basis, the
directors do not believe it would be in WebCentral shareholders’ interests to further
pursue NetRegistry’s proposal.
Lucy Turnbull, Chair of WebCentral said “WebCentral’s directors believe Melbourne IT’s
offer represents an attractive opportunity for WebCentral shareholders. They did not
wish to put that offer at risk by pursuing a complicated, conditional proposal that was at
an early stage of development.”
Yours faithfully,
Nicola Seaton
Company Secretary