1) The document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a teacher in the Abra High School in the Philippines.
2) It outlines two key result areas (KRAs) - content knowledge and pedagogy, and use of teaching strategies to enhance learning.
3) For each KRA, it lists performance indicators and provides a rating scale to evaluate the teacher's performance, with supporting evidence required from various means of verification (MOV).
1) The document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a teacher in the Abra High School in the Philippines.
2) It outlines two key result areas (KRAs) - content knowledge and pedagogy, and use of teaching strategies to enhance learning.
3) For each KRA, it lists performance indicators and provides a rating scale to evaluate the teacher's performance, with supporting evidence required from various means of verification (MOV).
1) The document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a teacher in the Abra High School in the Philippines.
2) It outlines two key result areas (KRAs) - content knowledge and pedagogy, and use of teaching strategies to enhance learning.
3) For each KRA, it lists performance indicators and provides a rating scale to evaluate the teacher's performance, with supporting evidence required from various means of verification (MOV).
1) The document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a teacher in the Abra High School in the Philippines.
2) It outlines two key result areas (KRAs) - content knowledge and pedagogy, and use of teaching strategies to enhance learning.
3) For each KRA, it lists performance indicators and provides a rating scale to evaluate the teacher's performance, with supporting evidence required from various means of verification (MOV).
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cordillera Administrative Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ABRA ABRA HIGH SCHOOL Bangued, Abra
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Teacher I Position: Head Teacher III Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Bureau of Secondary Education/ Abra High School/SDO-ABRA Date of Review: TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DUTING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators RATING
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per Score Actual Results KRA Very QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactor Unsatisfactory Poor Q E Ave (2) T (5) (4) y (1) (3) Basic 1 Content 1 Applied June Showed Showed Showed Showed No Education Services knowledge knowledge of 2018 – 7.5% Quality knowledge of knowledge knowledge knowledge acceptable and content April content and of content of content of content evidence Pedagogy within and 2019 its integration and its and its and its was across within and integration integration integration shown curriculum across within and within and within and teaching subject areas across across across areas as shown in subject subject subject areas MOV 1 with areas as areas as as shown in a rating of 7 shown in shown in MOV 1 with MOV 1 MOV 1 a rating of 4 with a rating with a rating of 6 of 5 Submitted at Submitted Submitted Submitted at No Efficiency least 4 at least 3 at least 2 least 1 acceptable lessons using lessons lessons lessons using evidence MOV 1 of using MOV using MOV MOV 1 of was the other 1 of the 1 of the the other shown given MOV other given other given given MOV MOV MOV Timeliness
per Actual Results KRA Score QET Very Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av (4) (2) (5) (3) (1) e Basic 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated Facilitated Facilitating Facilitated No Education of teaching using different using using using different acceptable Services strategies that teaching different different teaching evidence enhance learner strategies that teaching teaching strategies that was shown achievement in literacy and promote strategies that strategies that promote numeracy skills. reading, promote promote reading, writing and/or reading, reading, writing and/or numeracy writing writing numeracy skills as shown and/or and/or skills as shown in MOV 1 numeracy numeracy in MOV 1 with a rating 7 skills as skills as with a rating shown in shown in of 4 MOV 1 with MOV 1 with a rating of 6 a rating of 5 Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No least 4 learner- learner- learner- learner- acceptable centered centered centered centered evidence lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as was shown evidently evidently evidently evidently shown in shown in shown on shown in any MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and of the given supported by supported by supported by MOV any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the other MOV other MOV other MOV given given given Timeliness Basic 3. Applied a Quality Used different Used Used Used different No Educatio range of teaching different different teaching acceptable n teaching strategies that teaching teaching strategies that evidence Services strategies to develop strategies that strategies that develop was shown critical and develop develop critical and develop creative critical and critical and creative critical and thinking creative creative thinking creative and/or other thinking thinking and/or other thinking as HOTS as and/or other and/or other HOTS as well as other shown in HOTS as HOTS as shown in higher-order MOV 1 with a shown in shown in MOV 1 with a thinking rating of 7 MOV 1 with MOV 1 with rating of 4 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 skills
per Actual Results KRA Score QET Very Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av (4) (2) (5) (3) (1) e Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lessons as acceptable as evidenced evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and was shown supported by supported by supported by supported by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by supported by supported by supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the other given other given other given other given MOV MOV MOV MOV Timeliness 2 Learning 4. Managed Quality Used Used Used Used No Environme classroom classroom classroom classroom classroom acceptable structure to management management management management evidence nt and engage learners, Diversity strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that was shown individually or engage engage engage engage of in groups, in meaningful learners in learners in learners in learners in Learners activities/tasks activities/task activities/task activities/tasks exploration, discovery and as shown in s as shown in s as shown in as shown in hands-on MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with a activities within rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 rating of 4 a range of Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No physical least 4 lessons lessons lessons lessons acceptable learning environments. supported by supported by supported by supported by evidence MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and was shown any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the other other other other acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV MOV MOV MOV Timeliness 5. Managed Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No learner teacher teacher teacher teacher acceptable behaviour management management management management evidence constructively strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of was shown by applying positive and learner learner learner learner non-violent behaviour that behaviour behaviour behaviour that discipline to promote that promote that promote promote ensure learning- positive and positive and positive and positive and focused non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent environments. discipline discipline discipline discipline MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING per Actual Results KRA Score QET Very Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av (4) (2) (5) (3) (1) e as shown on as shown on as shown on as shown on MOV MOV MOV MOV submitted with submitted submitted submitted with a rating of 7 with a rating with a rating a rating of 4 of 6 of 5 Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the acceptable given given given given evidence strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as was shown observed in observed in observed in observed in 1 at least 4 3 lessons 2 lessons lessons lessons Timeliness 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable developmental teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence ly appropriate strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown learning address learner address address address learner experiences to diversity as learner learner diversity as address shown in diversity as diversity as shown in learners’ MOV 1 with a shown in shown in MOV 1 with a gender, needs, rating of 7 MOV 1 with MOV 1 with rating of 4 strengths, a rating of 6 a rating of 5 interests and Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted No experiences. least 4 differentiate differentiate any 1 acceptable differentiated d teaching d teaching differentiated evidence teaching strategies in strategies in teaching was shown strategies in at least 2 2 lessons as strategy in at least 2 lessons as evidenced only 1 lesson lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 as evidently evidenced by by MOV 1 and shown in any MOV 1 and and supported 1 of the supported by supported by any 1 of acceptable any 1 of by any 1 of other MOV other other acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV MOV MOV Timeliness
per Actual Results KRA Score QET Very Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av (4) (2) (5) (3) (1) e 3. 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No Curriculum managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable and implemented developmental developmenta developmenta developmental evidence Planning develop- ly sequenced lly sequenced lly sequenced ly sequenced was shown teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and mentally learning learning learning learning sequenced process as process as process as process as teaching and shown in shown in shown in shown in learning MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with a processes to rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 rating of 4 meet Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No curriculum least 4 develop- develop- developmental acceptable requirements developmental mentally mentally ly sequenced evidence and varied ly sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching and was shown teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and learning contexts. learning learning learning process as process as process as process as evidently evidently evidently evidently shown in shown in shown in shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by supported by supported by supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the other given other given other given other given MOV MOV MOV MOV Timeliness 8. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No Participated participated in participated participated participated in acceptable LACs/FGDs/ in in LACs/FGDs/ evidence in collegial meetings to LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meetings to was shown discussions discuss meetings to meetings to discuss that use teacher/learner discuss discuss teacher/learner teacher and feedback to teacher/learne teacher/learne feedback to enrich r feedback to r feedback to enrich learner instruction as enrich enrich instruction as feedback to shown in the instruction as instruction as shown in the enrich MOV shown in the shown in the MOV teaching submitted MOV MOV submitted practice. submitted submitted Efficiency Participated in Participated Participated Participated in No at least 4 in 3 in 2 LACs/ 1 LACs/ acceptable LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs FGDs FGDs/ evidence meeting as meetings as meeting as meeting as was shown MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING per Actual Results KRA Score QET Very Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av (4) (2) (5) (3) (1) e evidently evidently evidently evidently shown in any 1 shown in any shown in any shown in any 1 of the given 1 of the given 1 of the given of the given MOV MOV MOV MOV Timeliness 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed Developed Developed and No developed, used varied and used and used used varied acceptable organized teaching and varied varied teaching and evidence and used learning teaching and teaching and learning was shown resources, learning learning resources, appropriate including ICT, resources, resources, including ICT, teaching and to address including including to address learning learning goals ICT, to ICT, to learning goals resources, as shown in address address as shown in including MOV 1 with a learning goals learning goals MOV 1 with a ICT, to rating of 7 as shown in as shown in rating of 4 address MOV 1 with MOV 1 with learning a rating of 6 a rating of 5 goals Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No least 4 varied varied varied teaching and acceptable teaching and teaching and teaching and learning evidence learning learning learning resources, was shown resources, resources, resources, including ICT, including ICT, including including as evidently as evidently ICT, as ICT, as shown in shown in evidently evidently MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown in shown in supported by supported by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the any 1 of the supported by supported by acceptable acceptable any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV MOV acceptable acceptable MOV MOV Timeliness 4. 10. Designed Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No Assessme selected, selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable nt and organized organized and organized and organized and organized and evidence Reporting and used used used used used was shown diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and formative summative summative summative summative and assessment assessment assessment assessment summative as MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING per Actual Results KRA Score QET Very Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av (4) (2) (5) (3) (1) e Assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies consistent with consistent consistent consistent with consistent curriculum with with curriculum with requirements curriculum curriculum requirements as shown in requirements requirements as shown in curriculum MOV 1 with a as shown in as shown in MOV 1 with a requirements. rating of 7 MOV 1 with MOV 1 with rating of 4 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No least 4 varied varied varied assessment acceptable assessment assessment assessment tool as evidence tools as tools as tools as evidently was shown evidently evidently evidently shown in any 1 shown in any 1 shown in any shown in any of the of the 1 of the 1 of the acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV MOV MOV MOV Timeliness 11. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No Monitored monitored and monitored monitored monitored and acceptable and evaluated evaluated and evaluated and evaluated evaluated evidence learner learner learner learner was shown learner progress and progress and progress and progress and progress and achievement achievement achievement achievement achievement using learner using learner using learner using learner using learner attainment attainment attainment attainment data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown attainment in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV data. submitted submitted submitted submitted Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No combination of combination combination acceptable acceptable at least 4 of the of 3 of the of 2 of the MOV evidence acceptable acceptable acceptable was shown MOV MOV MOV Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No MOV were MOV were MOV were MOV was acceptable Timeliness distributed distributed distributed completed in evidence across 4 across 3 across 2 only 1 quarter was shown quarters quarters quarters
per Actual Results KRA Score QET Very Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av (4) (2) (5) (3) (1) e 12. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No Communicat showed showed showed prompt and acceptable ed promptly prompt and prompt and prompt and clear evidence and clearly clear clear clear communicatio was shown communicatio communicati communicati n of the the learners’ n of the on of the on of the learners’ needs, learners’ learners’ learners’ needs, progress and needs, needs, needs, progress and achievements progress and progress and progress and achievement to , including achievement to achievement achievement key parents/ key to key to key stakeholders, guardians. stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, including including including including parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/ guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV MOV MOV MOV submitted submitted submitted submitted a rating of 5 Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any No combination of combination combination 1 of the given acceptable at least 4 of the of 3 of the of 2 of the MOV evidence acceptable acceptable acceptable was shown MOV MOV MOV Timeliness Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No MOV were MOV were MOV were MOV was acceptable distributed distributed distributed completed in evidence across 4 across 3 across 2 only 1 quarter was shown quarters quarters quarters 5. Plus 13. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No Factor Performed performed performed performed performed acceptable various various related various various various related evidence related work/ related work/ related work/ work/ was shown activities that activities that activities that activities that works/ contribute to contribute to contribute to contribute to activities that the teaching the teaching the teaching the teaching contribute to learning learning learning learning the process as process as process as process as MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING per Actual Results KRA Score QET Very Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av (4) (2) (5) (3) (1) e shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV MOV MOV MOV submitted submitted submitted submitted Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No least 4 different different 1 of acceptable acceptable different kinds kinds of kinds of MOV evidence of acceptable acceptable acceptable was shown MOV MOV MOV Timeliness RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS