Writ of Kalikasan and Writ of Continuing Mandamus

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Writ of Kalikasan and Writ of Continuing

Mandamus
What is a Writ of Kalikasan?
It is a remedy available to a natural or juridical person, entity authorized by law, people’s
organizations, non-governmental organization, or any public interest group accredited
by or registered with any government agency, on behalf of persons whose constitutional
right to a balanced and healthful ecology is violated, or threatened with violation by an
unlawful act or omission of a public official or employee, or private individual or entity
without involving environmental damage of such magnitude as to prejudice the life,
health or property of inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces.

What is the basis of the Writ of Kalikasan?


It rests in Article II, Section 16 on the Declaration of Principles and State Policies of the
1987 Constitution, which states that, “The State shall protect and advance the right of
the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony
of nature”.

What is the important feature of this writ?


The magnitude requirement with regards to the destruction or imminent destruction
which is sought to be prevented must be present.

What is a Writ of Continuing Mandamus?


It is writ issued by a court in an environmental case directing any agency or
instrumentality of the government or officer thereof to perform an act or series of acts
decreed by final judgment which shall remain effective until judgment is fully satisfied. It
is filed by one who is personally aggrieved. (Contributor, Ihra Faith C Magno)
Summary of difference and similarities of Writ of Kalikasan and Writ of Continuing
Mandamus

Writ of Continuing

Writ of Kalikasan Mandamus


 

Subject Matter Unlawful act or Neglect or exclusion; law,


omission; life health or

property rule or right

Any person or

representative /agent

(PO/NGO/Public One who is personally

Petitioner Interest Group) aggrieved

Public or private entity

Respondent or individual Government or officers

Temporary

Environmental

Protection Order

(TEPO) Ancillary remedy Ancillary remedy

Supreme Court or Court

Venue of Appeals Supreme Court, CA or RTC


Ocular inspection or

Discovery production of

Measures documents No enumeration

Allow damages for

Damages None; separate suit malicious neglect of duty

You might also like