Business Ethics q4
Business Ethics q4
Business Ethics q4
Whistle Blowing
can also call that “making a disclosure”. The wrongdoing will typically (although not
necessarily) be something they have witnessed at work. The disclosure by a person, usually an
It is good to practice whistle blowing to create an open, transparent and safe working
environment where workers feel able to speak up. Although the laws does not require employers
to have a whistle blowing policy in place, the existence of a whistle blowing policy shows an
employer’s commitment to the concern of workers. By having clear policies and procedures for
dealing with whistle blowing, an organization can bring information to the attention of
management.
Whistle blower is one who reveals wrongdoing within an organization to the authority. This wrongdoing
Those who become whistleblowers can choose to bring information either internally or externally.
Internally, a whistleblower can bring his/her accusations to the attention of other people within the
accused organization. Externally, a whistleblower can bring allegations to light by contacting a third party
outside of an accused organization. Sometimes whistleblowers also face retaliation from those who are
accused of wrongdoing.
The whistle-blower serves a vital function in organization. When organization step over legal and ethical
lines, whistle-blowers can make these practices public knowledge, which can lead to violators being held
accountable. The added scrutiny that comes with criminal investigations, civil lawsuits and media
attention can influence the behavior of similar organizations. Companies offices that engage in similar
misconduct may have previously believed they could get away with their bad behavior.
The whistleblower, who has stepped forward to tell the truth, despite a mix of emotions and fears.
Feelings of disloyalty are at war with those of obligation and, possibly, outrage at something very wrong
Fear of bad publicity, expensive litigation and loss of business can make a company hostile and defensive,
usually at the expense of the whistleblower's personal or professional reputation. The individual' s
coworkers get suspicious and angry because their expertise or ethics may be suspect. The
If that employee has blown the whistle not only on his or her boss but also on the company by taking the
case outside to other authorities or to the media, the harsh truth is that this represents a failure on
everybody's part. It means the organization had not allowed the normal use of communications from the
bottom up and that reporting procedures had not worked or that the whistleblower had not found them
to be receptive.
The damage to whistleblowers is extensive. Many lose their jobs and economic impact is enormous.
Health and relationship problems are common. Many are forced out of their field and are unable to
the organization. A dismissed whistleblower who takes the employer to court for wrongful dismissal has
to spend large amounts of money on lawyers while surviving without a salary, confronting an
organization with virtually unlimited funds and time. The scales are heavily tilted against the
whistleblower.
The Organization
The attention that a whistle-blower case brings, both to the employee and the company, can have a
downside. One of the principle reasons to blow the whistle on illegal or unethical activities is to protect
the public, colleagues or others from risk. The more immediate and the more significant the risk, the
more important to take action efficiently. When companies engage in activities that could cause physical
or mental harm to people, or environmental damage, many believe it is your duty to make those
activities known.
There is also great damage to the organization. A talented employee is damaged or lost. There may be
extensive legal or compensation costs. Reprisals against whistleblowers send a powerful message to
other employees, speak out and will suffer. The result is often greater acquiescence to managerial
Whistleblowers can cause a sort of pain to organizations. Sometimes their warnings are misguided, at
others, their concerns point to deeper problems. Sometime, brought down the organization.