Paper Wedepohl Wilcox1
Paper Wedepohl Wilcox1
Paper Wedepohl Wilcox1
systems
System-model and wave-propagation characteristics
Prof. L. M. Wedepohl, B.Sc.(Eng.), Ph.D., C. Eng., F.I.E.E., and D. J. Wilcox, B.Sc. Tech. M.Sc., Ph.D.
Indexing terms: Modelling, Power transmission, Skin effect, Transients, Transmission-line theory, Underground
cables
ABSTRACT
A mathematical model suitable for the analysis of travelling-wave phenomena in underground power-transmission
systems is presented. The model is developed in terms of a generalised angular frequency, and may therefore be
applied to the solution of steady-state problems or, by means of Fourier-transform techniques, to the solution of
transient problems. The model takes into account skin effect in the conductors and in the soil. It is then shown
how the system model may be analysed using multiconductor-transmission-line theory to give the transient res-
ponse of the cable system. The wave-propagation characteristics are given for the natural modes of a certain
cable system. These characteristics are examined with a view to their implications on transient phenomena.
P6
group of central conductors may be reasonably represented (iii) z 3 , the inner sheath internal impedance. This impe-
by a single equivalent conductor for calculating longitudinal- dance is calculated from the voltage drop on the inner
induction effects. surface of the sheath per unit current which returns
via the inner conductor
There are n = 2N metallic conductors, and the soil in which
the cables are buried constitutes an (n + l)th conductor (iv) z 4 , the sheath mutual impedance. This impedance is
which is chosen as the voltage reference for the system. given from the voltage drop along the outer (inner)
surface of the sheath per unit current returning through
the inner (outer) conductor. In this case, the outer
2.2 Formulation of shunt-admittance matrix conductor is the soil
Maxwell's field equations show that, in any electromagnetic
field, (v) z 5 ,the outer sheath internal impedance. This is given
from the voltage drop along the outer surface of the
sheath when the current returns through the outer
conductor
3t ~ ep
(vi) z 6 , the impedance due to the time-varying flux in the
where p is the volume charge density at any point. This outer insulation
equation has the solution p = p0 exp (—a/et), which shows (vii) z 7 , the self impedance of the earth-return path.
that, if a charge is introduced into a conducting medium (a *
0), it will dilute itself with a time constant of e/o seconds. In At low frequencies, zx is equal to the d.c. resistance of the
a good conductor such as copper, this time constant will be inner conductor. At higher frequencies, the classical formula
of the order of only 10~19 s, and therefore a charge intro-
duced into the body of a good conductor will be very quickly
displaced onto its surface. The process is not so rapid in the pm
soil, which is a poor conductor, but, even for a relatively high ohms per metre (2)
soil resistivity, say 1000 fim,the time constant is still quite 27rr 1 I 1 (mr 1 )
small, being of the order of 10~8 s. Thus, if the smallest
unit of time of interest is not less than, say, 10~6 s,the which takes account of skin effect. An approximate formula,
electric charges in the cable system may be assumed to be which is generally more suitable for digital computation, is
surface charges. deduced in Appendix 8.1, and quoted here:
In the present model, it is, indeed, assumed that the smallest _ pm coth
time interval of interest in the transient response is large 1
+ - ohms per metre (3)
enough to justify the assumption that all charges are surface 27rr1
charges. This greatly simplifies the calculations, as the The maximum error in the resistive (real) part of this im-
instantaneous value of the time-varying lateral electric field pedance is 4% and occurs when | rm^ | = 5. The maximum
has the same form as the electrostatic field. This latter is error in the reactive component is 5%, and occurs when
readily deducible from elementary theory. Irm^ | = 3*5. Away from these maxima, the formula is very
accurate. This formula is justified by the fact that it general-
2.2.1 Admittance submatrices ly requires rather less digital computation than that of eqn.
2, to which it is an approximation.
The shunt admittance submatrix of the ith c?ble has the di-
mension 2 x 2 and is given by The impedances z2 and z 6 present no problem, and are
given by
v
i -Y
Y2
where
+
In(r 4 /r 3 )
Yl = gi jw2ire 1 /ln(r 2 /r 1 )
Z
which has the solution
13
Z
21 Z
2 Z
23
V = exp (-xV(ZY))V+ + exp (+xV(ZY))V" (9)
Z =
Z Z
31 32 for the conductor voltages at a distance of x along the sys-
tem. V+ and V~ are vectors containing the 2n constants of
integration which are deduced from a knowledge of the sys-
The offdiagonal submatrices Zjj are not null,but take account tem boundary conditions. The matrix functions may be
of the mutual inductance between cables. efficiently evaluated as a consequence of the eigenvalue
definition.6
The net current in the ith cable returning through the soil,
i.e.the algebraic sum of the conductor and sheath currents, The solution for the system currents follows from the above
gives rise to a voltage drop in the soil adjacent to the jth result by using eqn. la to give
cable. This voltage drop gives the e.m.f.induced into each
conductor of this cable; i.e.the same e.m.f.is induced in both I = Z" 1 V(ZY) [exp {-xV(ZY)}v+ - exp {+xV(ZY)}V"] (10)
conductors. It follows from these remarks that all four
elements of the submatrix Z« must be equal;i.e. The distribution vectors for the n natural modes of propa-
gation are given by the n columns of the eigenvector matrix
of ZY and the distribution vectors for the n natural modes
Z = of current propagation are given by the n rows of the in-
verse eigenvector matrix. These vectors permit a physical
indentification of the natural modes.
The elemental impedances ZJJ may be calculated from Pol- The propagation coefficients of the n natural modes are
laczek's formulas. Formulas equivalent to those of Pol- given by the eigenvalues of the matrix V(ZY).
laczek have been deduced in Appendix 8.1 by means of inte-
gral-transform techniques. For |ms«| < 0*25,the mutual For transient problems,the above solutions are transformed
impedance zx between the ith and jth cables is given by back into the time domain by means of the Fourier integ-
ral. 2 ; 3 Thus,for example,
2TT
— ml ohms per metre (8) V (t) = j - /_+°° V(w) exp (jwt)dw
where S-H is the distance between the ith and jth cables,/! is
the magnetic permeability of the soil,y is Euler's constant 4 NATURAL MODES OF PROPAGATION
and I represents the sum of the depths of the ith and jth
cables. This formula reduces to that given by eqn. 7 by re- The nature of the natural modes of wave propagation in cable
placing Sji by the cable radius r 4 . The formula will,in fact, systems will be illustrated by considering a cable circuit
be valid up to quite high frequencies in practice—of the consisting of three identical power cables layed in a flat con-
order of 100 kHz for cables buried in the same trench. figuration at a depth of 0 76 m and with a cable separation of
At frequencies for which | ms-jjl > 0-25, the full form given 015 m,as shown in Fig. 3. The cable-design specification is
by eqn. 40 may be used. However, this form is rather com- given in Appendix 8.4 (Fig. 3).
PROC.IEE, Vol.120, No.2, FEBRUARY 1973 255
4.1 Characteristics Modes b and c are seen from Table 1 to be intersheath
The attenuation characteristics of the six natural modes of modes. Mode b is energised by injecting unit current into
wave propagation of the present system are shown in Fig. 4 the sheath of the central cable (sheath 2) and extracting half
and the velocity characteristics are shown in Fig. 5. The of it from sheath 1 and the other half from sheath 3,while
mode 3 is energized by injecting unit current into sheath 1
and extracting it from sheath 3. These two modes are seen
from Fig. 4 to have a quasiconstant attenuation over quite a
air wide frequency band (of the order of two decades). This band
is very important, as it tends to dominate the frequency
soil spectra of many of the transient responses of interest.
15cm I 15cm
20 n m 75cm 160i—
120 —
Fig. 3
Cable configuration
10-Or—
TABLE 1
MODE-DISTRIBUTION VECTORS FOR CURRENT
Mode a b c d e f
Conductor
1 0001 94-3 0018 279 0-016 94 0-337 0 0343 180 0503 0
Sheath 1 0337 0 0343 180 0503 0 -0-337180-0-34413 -0505187
Conductor
2 0001 94-2 0-034 99 0350 0 -0-6620 0
Sheath 2 0-350 0 -0-662 0 -0-350180 0-664 193 0
Conductor
3 0001 943 0018 279 0-016 274 0337 0 0343 180 -0503 180
Sheath 3 0-337 0 0-343 180-0-503180 -0-337180 -0-34413 0505 7
Frequency = 1000 Hz
256 PROC.IEE, Vol.120, No. 2, FEBRUARY 1973
and z m is the mutual impedance between them. The impe- 39*2 km/ms and the modal attenuation to be constant at a D =
dances z e and z m are, effectively, given by eqns.7 and 8; 9-98 x 10- 6 (0-0866 dB/km). These estimated values are
seen to be in good agreement with those obtained from the
1 4 computer results given in Table 1. However, according to the
— ln ~ — , - mh (12) simple theory presented above, the attenuation should remain
constant as the frequency increases from 250 Hz, whereas it
Zrv, = -In 1 4
-ms (13) is seen to remain constant only up to about 10 kHz. The ex-
2 " - y mh planation is that the simple theory neglects skin effect which
where s is the cable separation. Now causes the resistance to increase as the square root of fre-
quency; this is confirmed in Fig. 4, as the attenuations of all
but the ground mode increase half a decade for one decade
(14) increase in frequency at the higher frequencies.
and hence the series impedance Zp of the intersheath path1 The factor k increases with cable separation, and hence both
becomes the velocity and the attenuation of the intersheath modes de-
crease with increasing cable separation.
(15) Modes d,e and f are seen from Table 1 to have essentially
coaxial natures, with velocities which approach the natural
which is exactly the same series impedance as would be velocity for the dielectric medium,i.e. 165 km/ms. Mode d
obtained if the soil in which the cables are buried were re- is a zero-sequence-type mode which is energised by inject-
placed by air. This will remain valid so long as | m s | < 0'25, ing unit current into each cable conductor and extracting it
i.e.up to a frequency of 1'7 MHz in the present instance, from the corresponding sheath. Mode e attempts to be an
which should be quite high enough for most practical transient interconductor mode energised by injecting two units of
studies. current into the conductor of cable 2 and extracting half of
this from the conductor of cable 1 and the other half from
Consider now the shunt admittance yp of the same path; the
the conductor of cable 3. However,much of the flux linking
earth acts as an electrostatic shield oetween the cables, and with the interconductor path also links with the correspond-
hence ing intersheath path, and therefore induces an intersheath
circulating current which opposes this flux linkage, tending
_ 1^ jae27T (16) to convert the interconductor mode into a coaxial mode and
y
P " 2 In(r 4 /r 3 ) an intersheath mode. At rather low frequencies,the circulat-
ing sheath current is restricted by the relatively high sheath
The propagation coefficient yp of this pure intersheath mode resistance,and mode d will,indeed,behave as a true inter-
is then given from eqns. 15 and 16 as conductor mode. As the frequency increases, the sheath
resistance becomes progressively less and less effective in
(17) supressing the sheath current and, in fact,the Figures show
that the characteristics of mode e merge with those of the
Now, if the inductance L of the cable outer insulation is pure coaxial mode e at about 100 Hz. A similar transforma-
given by tion into a coaxial mode occurs for mode f. However, at the
lower frequencies such that modes e and f retain an essential
interconductor-mode nature,the attenuation (and, incidentally,
(18) the velocity) tends to be lower than is perhaps expected,for
much the same reasons as those given for the intersheath
and the sheath-earth capacitance C is given by modes;this is just as well,as these are the modes of normal
power transmission.
C = 27T€/ln(r4/r3) (19)
(25)
This formula is deduced by considering first the formula (28b)
z
= 2^7 c o t h (mr )
i where r is the radial distance from the sheath axis.
This simple formula is known to exhibit similar properties Elimination of first H and then J between these two equations
to the exact expression given by eqn. 2. For example, at high result in two 2nd-order differential equations, one in H and
frequencies,this impedance tends to pm/27Trl5which is the the other in J. These equations are, in fact,Bessel's equa-
well known skin-effect formula, while at low frequencies it tions and lead to the classical result given in eqn. 27.
represents a pure resistance, although not,in fact, equal to
The approximate formulas are derived on the assumption
the required value of p/irrf.
that the sheath is thin compared with its mean radius. In
This formula may be improved by introducing a degree of this case, eqn. 28a may be written as
freedom so that
dH 2_
H= J (29)
dr (r, + r 3 )
z = coth (kmr,) + - £ - (1 - l/2k) (26)
2irr Trrf
Elimination of first H and then J between eqns. 29b and 30
where k is an arbitrary constant. The second term on the results in two 2nd-order differential equations with constant
right-hand side corrects the impedance at direct current. At coefficients. The solution of these equations with suitable
high frequencies,this formula tends towards the required boundary conditions applied leads to the approximate
skin-effect impendance. The constant k is chosen to optimise formulas.
the formula at the lower frequencies.
Expanding eqn. 26 in series form, 8.3 Earth-return impedances of buried-cable system
The ground is assumed to be a homogeneous medium whose
z = — { 1 +k(mr1)2/6-k3(mr1)4/90 + . . . ] flat surface divides space into two semi-infinite regions:
•nrf soil and air. It is further assumed that the field in the soil
whereas the corresponding expansion of the classical for- will be insignificantly different from the field that would be
mula is present if the cables were replaced by infinitely thin insu-
lated conductors and their volumes were replaced by soil.
zx = - £ - {1 + ( m r ^ / 8 - (mr,)V192 + . . . } The required results may be deduced from the electric-
7rrf field intensity E in the soil when current i flows in an
258 PROC.IEE, Vol.120, No.2, FEBRUARY 1973
insulated conductor and returns through the soil. Let this whose co-ordinates are (x,y):
conductor be buried at a depth h below the surface of the
ground, as shown in Fig. 6. This Figure shows the conductor "exp{-(h + y)V(a2 + m 2)}
in a plane perpendicular to its axis and defines the reference P2m2i
E, = - 2 77
coordinates x and y. m2)
2
region 1 air
e x p { - | y - h | V ( a + m2,)} - exp{-|y + h|V(a 2 + m2,)}
m 2)
exp(jax)dx (33)
The general equation for electromagnetic-wave propagation where subscripts have been dropped, as all quantities relate
is only to the soil medium. It has also been assumed that ju2
= nx. The formula then corresponds to the integral form
given by Pollaczek.
V2E - V(VE) = (30)
This integral may be evaluated from a convergent series,
starting with the standard result
where V2 is the Laplacean operator and E is the electric-
field intensity.
(35)
For the present problem, it is reasonable to assume that
VE = 0 in both air and soil, and that displacement currents
may be neglected. These are the usual assumptions, and are where T = V(g2 + s 2 )
justifiable up to quite high frequencies. Eqn. 30 then simpli-
fies to
Eqn. 34 immediately simplifies to
V2E = (j (31)
% = ^ ~ {K0(mR) - K0(mR') + i j
On the basis of assumptions (i)-(iii) in Section 2.1,the elec-
tric force may be taken to be locally invariant in the direc- where R = V{x2 + (h -y) 2 },R' = V{x2 + (h + y) 2 } and
tion of propagation, and everywhere to be parallel to the
conductor. Eqn. 31 then simplifies to the following equations exp{—(h + y)V(a 2 + m 2 )}
in the two media: I, = —^—^ y— — exp(iax)da
1
2
3 E,
2
y>0 = —2 1 Sr ^(a 2 + m2) exp{-^V(a 2 + m2)} exp(jax)da
3x m I °°
R' 2 2! R'
Re
5 V R'5 3 R'3
, 1 \x\(3
R' /2
4 4! R'4 +—
2 \R'