The Philippine Context of Public Policy and Policy-Making
The Philippine Context of Public Policy and Policy-Making
The Philippine Context of Public Policy and Policy-Making
Submitted to:
Prof. Juvy Lizette M. Gervacio
Faculty-in-Charge
Submitted by:
Jonathan J. Lumanog, Jr.
2011-46391
1
The Philippine Context of Public Policy and Policy-Making
2
stated that it is divided it into two stages, pre-policy stages and policy stages. The pre-
policy stages are listed as follows: problem definition, policy demands, and agenda
formation. On the other hand, the policy stages are listed as follows: policy adoption,
policy implementation, policy evaluation, and problem redefinition.
The policy formation is categorized into rational planning (systematic planning)
and subjective reacting (haphazard planning). The former is perceived to be a proactive
approach while the latter is passive (“PPA 503 – The Public Policy-Making Process”,
n.d.).
The next steps are crucial to which stages included are policy adoption and
policy implementation. It is referred as a detrimental part in policy-making because it
heavily depends on public support, government’s availability of resources, allocation of
budget, and additional manpower/infrastructures. The policy evaluation is then carried
out by Philippine Institute for Development Studies that will help in the problem
redefinition to complete the policy-making process.
Mendoza (2015) stated that the government is now focused on delivering quality
service that promotes good governance and administration. She stated that two major
factors influence policy reforms; (1) the public sector inefficiencies and (2) liberal
economic ideology It stressed uniform quality, efficiency, responsiveness, and constant
improvement that provides transparency and accountability. It aims to reduce
corruption, inclusive public services for the marginalized sector, and better economic
environment for businesses. Specific issues included that affects reforms in public
policy are government procurement, bottom up budgeting, seal of good local
governance, anti-red tape, and citizen satisfaction index system (Mendoza, 2015)
Other issues are raised by Abonyi (2007) wherein he explores the policy reform
as an evolving experiment than following blueprints set in stone. He elaborated it by
stating policy reform involves change in rules, structures, systems, processes,
incentives, expectations, behaviors, power alignments, relationships, capabilities, and
institutions.
3
IV. Critique
V. References:
Cochran, C. E., et. al. (1999). American Public Policy: An Introduction. Wadsworth
Cengage Learning. Retrieved from http://www.politicipublice.ro/uploads
/introduction_public_ policy.pdf
Lynn, L. Jr. E. (1999). A place at the table: Policy analysis, its postpositive critics, and
the future of practice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(3), 411-
425. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/222360302?
accountid=47253
Trillanes, A. S. (2017). Understanding the Philippine Public Policy Process.
Retrieved from http://trillanes.com.ph/web/2017/06/21/understanding-philippine-
public-policy/
Mendoza, M. V. (2015) Policy Reforms to Improve the Quality of Public Services in the
Philippines. National College of Public Administration and Governance,
University of the Philippines (UP) Diliman Retrieved from http://ncpag.upd.
edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/The-Quality-of-Public-Services-in-the-
Philippines_Villamejor-Mendoza.pdf
4
VI. Slides/HTMLs: