MR Padua Case Analysis
MR Padua Case Analysis
MR Padua Case Analysis
PADUA
1. Describe the personality of Mr. Padua. How is this reflected in his communication style?
Mr. Padua is inexorable and intolerant. He is not willing to accept behavior or opinions
that are different from his own. He is not willing to change for the sake of other people.
Because of his personality he is often misunderstood as insensitive, different to please, and
unapproachable.
2. How has his style affected his relationship with his associates and subordinates?
A good rapport and goodwill between a leader and subordinates is very important. But,
in the case of Mr. Padua through his style caused misunderstandings between him and others.
Also people around him affected his relationship with his colleagues negatively because of his
style. Through his style it led people away or at distance from him.
3. If you were the management, would you have him replaced? Defend your stand.
No. Difficult personalities impact workers and damage the culture of an organization. As
the management, I should arrange to meet with Mr. Padua to explain how the behavior is
affecting his coworkers and the office environment. Awareness is the first and most important
step in dealing with an employee who has a difficult personality. I will join Mr. Padua to
trainings, team buildings, or pair him to effective mentors. Also open communication with his
assessing his performance. Managing Mr. Padua takes time, yet it is still worth the effort in
order to avoid additional hiring costs and maintain a talented employee.
4. What implications do the case have on management policies and practices on hiring and developing
workers and staff?
Organizations need to develop policies and procedures that reflect their vision, values
and culture as well as the needs of their employees. For without strong policies and procedures
in place, management may experience more workplace issues. From the case of Mr. Padua the
management fails to effectively communicate to him. Also clearly exemplifies that the
management rather that address Mr. Padua problematic behavior ignored it and simply wanting
him to be replaced. Management must develop employees they have rather than find new
staff/employee.