Physics (2017) : International Gcse
Physics (2017) : International Gcse
Physics (2017) : International Gcse
Physics (2017)
TOPIC GUIDE:
Astrophysics
Contents
Introduction 2
The specification 2
Units 3
Motion in the universe 4
Stellar evolution 12
Cosmology 20
You’re the Astrophysicist… 25
Appendix 1: Nuclear Fusion in Stars 32
Appendix 2: Further Support 36
International GCSE Physics
Introduction
Since the very beginning of human civilisation, we have tried to understand how our
Universe works. Many of the greatest advances in physics have come from the solution
of problems in astrophysics. Although the force of gravity attracts every particle in our
Universe to every other particle, other factors can oppose it. The generation of nuclear
energy can balance gravity to produce stars and the balance between gravity and the
expansion of our Universe is the cosmological problem which holds the key to the future
of the Universe itself.
The specification
The content of the specification for Topic 8: Astrophysics is arranged into 4 areas:
1. Units
This section of the specification is the same as statement 1.1, covering the units needed for
this area of the specification.
2. Motion in the universe
Specification statements 8.2 – 8.6 are taken from Topic 1 of the old International GCSE
Physics (2011) specification. They cover some basic terminology; the influence of g on the
movement of satellites, comets and moons; and circular motion.
The remaining statements in Topic 8 are new to the International GCSE Physics specification.
3. Stellar evolution
The life cycle of stars and their classification by colour (and, therefore, by surface
temperature) is covered by statements 8.7 – 8.10.
Statements 8.11 – 8.12 consider the concept of absolute magnitude and introduced the
Hertzsprung‐Russell diagram. These statements are covered in Physics only, and not in
Science (Double Award).
4. Cosmology
Statements 8.13 – 8.18 consider evidence in favour of the Big Bang, as opposed to the
steady state, theory for the evolution of the universe.
As part of this, consideration is also given to red shift as an application of the Doppler effect.
Again, these statements are covered in Physics only, and not in Science (Double Award).
Specification coverage
Students should:
8.1 use the following units: kilogram (kg), metre (m), metre/second (m/s),
metre/second2 (m/s2), newton (N), second (s), newton/kilogram (N/kg)
As with any other area of physics, all the units required for the physical quantities in
Astrophysics can be derived from the three base units of mass, length and time. The SI
(Système International) system gives these there quantities the units of the kilogram,
metre and second. The size of each of these three units have been agreed upon.
The units for all the other quantities in Astrophysics have been derived from these three
base units, giving units such as the metre per second for speed and metre per second2
for acceleration.
Combining the quantities of mass and acceleration allows us to derive the unit for Force
– appropriately named the Newton, as the force needed to make a 1kg mass accelerate
at 1m/s2.
Checkpoint questions
1. The Light-Year
A light-year is the distance travelled by a light wave in one year. If light travels at
3 x 108 m/s and there are 365¼ days in a year, calculate the number of kilometres in a
light-year.
2. The Light-Minute
The average distance between the Earth and the Sun is 150 000 000 km. How many
‘light-minutes’ away is the Sun from the Earth?
Specification coverage
Students should:
8.3 understand why gravitational field strength, g, varies and know that it is different on
other planets and the Moon from that on the Earth
8.5 describe the differences in the orbits of comets, moons and planets
8.6 use the relationship between orbital speed, orbital radius and time period:
The force of gravity can be seen at work on almost every scale within our Universe. From
attracting falling objects to the surface of the Earth through the orbits of planets, moons,
comets and stars to the shape of galaxies of billions of stars, to the evolution of the
Universe itself.
In the vacuum of space where there is no friction or air resistance, all objects would
naturally move in a straight line at a constant speed, as explained by Newton’s First Law
of Motion. If an object also experienced a gravitational force then it would start to follow
a curved path through space. If the sizes of their speed and the gravitational force were
just right, then they would circle around another object, following a path called an orbit.
Figure 1: Orbital Motion. Objects naturally move in a
straight line at a constant speed (Newton’s First Law of
Motion). The force of gravity from another body, pulling it
to the side, can cause it to move in a repeating curved
path called an orbit.
Although there are examples of orbits all around us in the Solar System and beyond, it
took many thousands of years for physicists to understand fully the physics behind
orbital motion.
One of the biggest difficulties is that the apparent movement of the Sun, Moon and stars
in the sky would look exactly the same to us whether the Earth orbited the Sun or the
Sun orbited the Earth1. With no ‘fixed’ background to check against, humans therefore
believed the most obvious Earth-centred or ‘geocentric’ view of the universe for many
thousands of years.
From the 16th century the work of astronomers like Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo
Galilei began to convince people that we actually live in a Sun-centred or ‘heliocentric’
Solar System. This allowed Johannes Kepler to explain the strange apparent motion of
the planets in the sky. He showed that all the planets (including the Earth) must be
moving in slightly oval or ‘elliptical’ orbits around the Sun.
1
It’s a very ancient idea in physics called ‘relativity’.
Although it’s fairly obvious that distant planets like Neptune take longer to orbit the Sun
than closer planets like Mercury, Kepler found some complex mathematical patterns
which only the great Isaac Newton was able to explain2.
Figure 3: Orbiting the Earth. In his great book
the ‘Principia’ of 1687, Isaac Newton imagined
objects fired or ‘projected’ at great speed from the
top of a very high mountain. The faster these
‘projectiles’ were fired, the further around the
Earth’s surface they would travel before hitting the
ground. If they were fired at a speed of 11 km/s
then the curve of their path would match the curve
of the Earth’s surface and they would go into orbit
around the Earth. Objects fired in this way from very
great heights above the Earth’s surface would follow
the orbital paths of objects like the Moon or an
artificial satellite. All orbital paths are elliptical in
shape although many, particularly those of the
planets, are almost circular.
Newton’s explanation claimed that there was a force attracting every particle in the
Universe to every other particle. Because of this every planet has a gravitational force
attracting it towards the Sun. Newton stated that the size of the gravitational force:
2
Incidentally, the idea of the falling apple being the inspiration for the theory of gravity was only mentioned by
Newton many years later when he was an old man.
This allowed Newton, with a single idea, to explain almost every motion which we see in
our Solar System:
the Earth follows a curved path around the Sun called its ‘orbit’, instead of
following the straight path predicted for it by Newton’s First Law of Motion
the Moon orbits in a tight curve around the Earth because of the gravitational
force between it and the Earth
moons orbit around almost all other planets in the solar system
other bodies such as planets and comets also follow elliptical paths around the
Sun, each as a result of their gravitational force pulling them towards the Sun
the Sun, despite its enormous mass3, moves slightly from side to side as a result
of the many gravitational forces4 pulling on it due to the planets and comets of
the Solar System.
3
It’s about 99.8% of the mass of the whole Solar System.
4
An excellent example of Newton’s Third Law of Motion in action.
Figure 6: Elliptical Orbits. Kepler observed and Newton proved that all objects orbiting under
the effect of gravity follow elliptical or oval paths. In some cases (planets) the ellipses can be hard
to distinguish from circles while in others (comets) the ellipses are much longer than they are
wide, i.e. very ‘eccentric’.
In more recent times, we have used the same physical principles to place artificial
satellites into orbit around the Earth, Moon, Sun and other planets.
Kepler identified that all orbits are elliptical or oval in shape, rather than circles as had
been assumed for many centuries. Some orbits, such as those of the planets are very
close to being circular whereas others, such as those of comets, are almost cigar-
shaped.
Figure 7: The Voyager Probes. Launched in 1977, these two spacecraft used the gravity of the
Earth, Sun and Jupiter to become the first probes to take photographs of the outer solar system.
Their paths were not ‘closed’ orbits and so they have both now left the Solar System, never to
return… (Image: ©NASA)
the Sun orbits the centre of its large group of stars called the Milky Way galaxy,
taking 230 million years to complete one orbit
a number of small ‘dwarf’ galaxies are orbiting around our Milky Way galaxy
the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are moving towards each other at around
300 km/s. Unfortunately their path is not that of an orbit and the two galaxies will
start to collide and merge in around four billion years.
the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies, along with a handful of smaller galaxies
are held together by the force of gravity into a group called the ‘Local Group’.
Figure 8: The Andromeda Galaxy. At a distance
of ‘only’ 2.5 million light years, the Andromeda
galaxy is part of our Local Group of galaxies, all
moving around each other as a result of the
gravitational forces between them. (Image: ©
NASA/Daniel Lopez/IAC)
The speed at which an object is orbiting can be calculated in a similar way to that of any
moving object, using the equation:
Since many orbits are approximately circular, the distance travelled will be equal to:
Giving:
Although it feels as though the Earth is not moving, it is in fact orbiting the Sun in a
huge circle with a radius of approximately 150 000 000 km, once every year.
Gives:
= 30 km/s
Phobos is one of the two tiny moons which orbit the planet Mars. With an orbital
radius of only 9377km it scoots around Mars in just 7.66 hours.
Gives:
= 58 888 / 27 576
= 2.1 km/s
Gives:
= 3.1 km/s
Checkpoint questions
1. Key Terms
i) ellipse,
ii) orbit,
iii) satellite,
iv) galaxy,
v) Local Group.
2. Sputnik 1
Launched by the Soviet Union in 1957, Sputnik 1 was the first artificial satellite of the
Earth. The radius of its orbit was approximately 7000 km and it travelled at an orbital
speed of around 29 300 km/h.
The two tiny satellites of Mars are far from being ‘geostationary’ for any Martian
watching them from the surface of the planet. Mars turns on its axis once every
24 hours and 40 minutes. The innermost satellite, Phobos, orbits Mars once every
7.7 hours and Deimos orbits once every 30.4 hours.
Use this information to describe how Phobos and Deimos would appear to move
across the sky for an observer on the surface of Mars.
Specification coverage
Students should:
8.9 describe the evolution of stars of similar mass to the Sun through the following
stages:
• nebula
• star (main sequence)
• red giant
• white dwarf.
8.10 describe the evolution of stars with a mass larger than the Sun
Key Physics Summary
The force of gravity causes clouds of hydrogen nuclei to form into nebulae. By releasing
and radiating nuclear energy, stars are able to balance this gravitational collapse to form
stable stars. Eventually their hydrogen ‘fuel’ runs out meaning that stars need to find
other ways to balance the force of gravity in the later stages of their lives.
In some massive stars it is not possible to stop the gravitational collapse and a black
hole is formed.
Background Information
1. Colour
A fundamental concept in astrophysics is that the colour of a star is directly linked to its
surface temperature. The coolest stars glow a dull red colour, medium temperature stars
like the Sun are an orangey yellow whilst the very hottest stars are white or even blue-
white in colour.
This link is so important that astrophysicists give each star a Spectral Class based on its
colour, which links directly to its surface temperature, as shown below.
Since we cannot visit any of the stars, being able to determine their surface temperature
by classifying the light which we receive from them on Earth is an extremely useful tool
in astrophysics.
2. Brightness
6
This sequence of letters is easily remembered with the handy rhyme: ‘Wow! Oh Be A Fine Girl/Guy, Kiss Me!’
For example, a star with a magnitude of 3 is 2.5 times brighter than a star with a
magnitude of 4; a star with a magnitude of -3 is one hundred times brighter than a star
of magnitude 2 and so on.
(i) Apparent Magnitude – measures how bright a star looks when viewed from the
Earth. Although it is easy to measure it is obviously affected by both the star’s
actual power output as well as its distance. Consequently some very powerful
stars have a dim apparent magnitude because they are a long way from the
Earth. The Sun obviously has the brightest apparent magnitude (-26.7) because it
is so much closer than any other star, not because it is the most powerful star in
the universe!
Sirius7, the brightest star in the sky (after the Sun), has an apparent magnitude
of -1.46 and the unaided human eye can see stars with an apparent magnitude as
faint as 6.5 under perfect conditions. Using binoculars or a telescope allows the
eye to see even fainter magnitudes. A telescope with a mirror 30cm in diameter,
for example, allows the eye to see objects with apparent magnitudes as faint as
14, whilst those used by professional astronomers can image objects well below
an apparent magnitude of 25.
(ii) Absolute Magnitude – this is effectively a ‘fair test’ for the true brightness or
‘luminosity’ of stars. It is their position on the magnitude scale not as viewed
from Earth but as viewed from a common distance of 32.68 light years. Absolute
magnitude is therefore extremely useful in astrophysics as it is directly related to
the actual power output of a star, unaffected by its distance from the Earth.
Obviously it cannot be measured from the Earth but must be calculated by other
means.
If the Sun, which is a relatively low powered star, was moved away to a distance
of 32.6 light years it would obviously appear much fainter, with an absolute
magnitude of only 4.8. In contrast the blue supergiant star Rigel, with its absolute
magnitude of -7.8, would appear brighter than the full Moon if viewed from just
32.6 light years. In reality it is around 860 light years from Earth and therefore
appears only as a bright star with an apparent magnitude of 0.13.
7
Sirius is actually a binary star – two stars very close to each other and it can be found by following the line of
the belt of three stars in the constellation of Orion down to the left – see Figure 12.
8
An important distance in astrophysics is the parsec which is 3.26 light years. This standard distance for
measuring absolute magnitude is therefore ten parsecs.
Nebula
Over very long periods of time the force of gravity begins to bring together clouds of
hydrogen gas. As these clouds form and get steadily smaller, the force of gravity
becomes stronger and accelerates the process. A collapsing cloud of gas like this
represents the first stage in the evolution of a star and is called a Nebula.
As gravity makes the nebula smaller and denser, this increases the temperature and
pressure at the centre. Eventually the temperature at the centre reaches a value of
around 10 million degrees. At this temperature, the hydrogen nuclei within the nebula
are moving so quickly that they can overcome the electrostatic repulsion between them,
allowing them to fuse together.
Figure 10: The Orion
Nebula. Situated just
below the three stars of
Orion’s Belt, the Orion
Nebula is an example of a
nebula where new stars
are being formed from a
cloud of collapsing
hydrogen nuclei. (Image:
© NASA/Francesco
Battistella)
When two nuclei of hydrogen fuse together, they form a nucleus of helium and a huge
amount of energy is released. The energy released by this nuclear fusion reaction
creates an outward force called ‘radiation pressure’ as it makes its way from the core to
the surface of the star.
When the radiation pressure is strong enough to balance the gravitational forces within
the nebula, it will stop collapsing and a stable star is formed.
Stars which formed from larger nebulae will obviously form into more massive or ‘giant’
stars. The gravitational forces trying to compress these stars will be much larger than
those of our Sun and they will require much larger radiation pressure to keep them
stable. These stars will therefore be much more powerful and brighter than the Sun.
Although the balance between the inward force of gravity and the outward force of
radiation pressure in a Main Sequence star can allow the star to shine with a fairly
constant output for several billion years, the hydrogen ‘fuel’ required for nuclear fusion
will eventually run out9. When this happens the core of the star begins to collapse under
the relentless pull of gravity. This increases the temperature and pressure at the core of
the star, allowing it to start fusing the helium in its core to produce more energy and
therefore radiation pressure.
This radiation pressure pushes out the outer layers of the star, causing it to swell up
dramatically. It has been calculated that when the Sun runs out of hydrogen fuel, its
outer layers will grow to a point where Mercury, Venus and the Earth will be swallowed
up!
As the outer layers of the star are now much further from its core, they cool down and
only glow with a red colour, thus forming a Red Giant star.
9
Although you might expect larger stars to last longer, the lifetimes of the most massive stars are amongst the
shortest. Although they were formed from a larger nebula, the inward gravitational forces are much stronger,
forcing them to burn their hydrogen fuel much more quickly.
Figure 12: Orion. The constellation of Orion contains objects from across the range of stellar
evolution. Just below the three stars of Orion’s Belt is the Orion Nebula, where new stars are
forming whereas the bright star to the top left of the rectangle of Orion’s body is the red giant star
Betelgeuse. The other two stars in Orion’s body (Bellatrix and Saiph) have run out of their original
hydrogen ‘fuel’ and are therefore leaving the Main Sequence. They now shine by fusing helium and
other heavier elements in order to produce energy to stop collapsing under gravity. (Image: ©
NASA/Bill Dickinson)
Eventually the thin outer layers of a Red Giant star will run out of energy and only the
core of the star will remain. This is called a White Dwarf star – the hot dense core of a
star which has passed through the Red Giant stage.
When the Sun becomes a White Dwarf star it is expected to be only about the size of the
Earth. White Dwarf stars are obviously extremely dense as they represent the mass of a
star which gravity has squeezed into a space about the size of a small planet!
Very slowly the white dwarf star will cool and dim to become a Black Dwarf star, marking
the end of its evolution.
In the 1930s the Indian astrophysicist Subramanyan Chandrasekhar calculated that only
stars with a mass less than 1.4 times the mass of the Sun could end their lives as White
Dwarf stars. The force of gravity in stars heavier than this would be so strong that it
would continue to crush the star to even smaller sizes.
Stars with a mass greater than 1.4 solar masses10 pass through other stages of stellar
evolution, beyond the Red Giant stage. These include:
i) Supernova – stars much larger than the Sun form a Red Supergiant. As this
star collapses, matter is compressed beyond the density of a white dwarf star.
It becomes very unstable and this causes the star to explode as a supernova.
This throws dust and gas into space, forming a new nebula. When this
happens the star can become as bright as a galaxy for a few months.
ii) Neutron Star – in the later stages of its evolution, the gravity of a large star
can compress its core until it is only a few tens of kilometres across,
sometimes as a result of a supernova explosion. This produces a tiny, rapidly-
spinning star known as a neutron star.
iii) Black Hole – eventually some stars become so small and dense and their
gravitational fields so strong that not even waves of light can escape. These
stars are therefore called Black Holes. Although they emit no electromagnetic
radiation, their gravitational fields can pull matter in from nearby stars. This
material can glow very brightly as it falls into the black hole.
10
Now known as the Chandrasekhar Limit.
Checkpoint questions
1. Key terms
i) nebula,
ii) Main Sequence star,
iii) red giant,
iv) white dwarf,
v) supernova,
vi) neutron star,
vii) black hole.
2. Key stages
Identify each of the following stages of stellar evolution from these descriptions:
Specification coverage
Students should:
8.13P describe the past evolution of the universe and the main arguments in favour of
the Big Bang
8.14P describe evidence that supports the Big Bang theory (red-shift and cosmic
microwave background (CMB) radiation)
8.15P describe that if a wave source is moving relative to an observer there will be a
change in the observed frequency and wavelength
8.16P use the equation relating change in wavelength, wavelength, velocity of a galaxy
and the speed of light:
∆λ/λ = v/c
8.17P describe the red-shift in light received from galaxies at different distances away
from the Earth
8.18P explain why the red-shift of galaxies provides evidence for the expansion of the
universe
In the early twentieth century, astrophysicists discovered that the galaxies in our
Universe are all moving away from each other at great speed. This is due to the fact that
the space in our Universe is expanding. More recent evidence such as the discovery of
cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) suggests that this is best explained by
the Big Bang theory. This theory states that our Universe was in an incredibly small
space about 13.8 billion years ago and supports a number of predictions for the future of
our Universe.
Background Information
Since the 17th century, cosmologists had struggled with the problem that a universe
governed by gravity alone would naturally collapse at a faster and faster rate. However,
even a naked-eye glance at the night sky shows that our universe is mostly empty
space11.
The answer to this riddle came in 1929 when Edwin Hubble made a series of
observations of some very distant galaxies – all of them well outside the Local Group. By
splitting their light into its spectrum he found that its wavelengths had all been stretched
or ‘shifted’ to the red (longer) end of the spectrum. Naming this effect ‘red shift’, Hubble
realised that it must be caused by the galaxies all moving away from us at great speed.
He realised that the increase in wavelength was the result of the Doppler Effect. Here on
Earth it is most commonly observed with the sound waves emitted by a fast-moving
object such as a car or train. If the moving object sounds its horn as it passes us then
11
Although it was written about by many scientists for many years, it has become known as Olber’s Paradox.
Since all the galaxies which he observed appeared to be moving away from us, with the
more distant galaxies moving fastest of all, Hubble realised that these observations
meant that the universe was expanding.
Hubble was able to use the Doppler Effect equation to calculate exactly how quickly each
galaxy was moving away from us, as illustrated in the following example:
The different colours/wavelengths within the light from a distant galaxy are separated. A
wavelength of 6 x 10-7 m is received on Earth at a wavelength of 6.3 x 10-7 m. Use this
information to calculate the speed at which the galaxy is moving away from the Earth.
λ is the wavelength at which the light would be received, if the galaxy was not
moving
In this example, λ = 6 x 10-7 m, ∆λ = 0.3 x 10-7 m; the speed of light, c = 3 x 108 m/s.
An alternative way of approaching calculations like these is to use the fact that:
This means that the galaxy must be travelling at 5% of the speed of light
This alternative method can be useful for checking red-shift calculations, particularly
when completing examination questions.
Although at first glance the fact that every galaxy outside our Local Group is moving
away from us might suggest that we are at the centre of the Universe, this is not the
case. As shown in Figure 15, a better way of visualising the situation is to imagine all the
galaxies in the Universe as dots marked on the surface of a balloon.
Figure 15: The Expansion of the Universe. A good way of picturing the expansion of the
universe is to think of a balloon with galaxies drawn on its surface being inflated. As the balloon
expands, every galaxy moves away from every other galaxy since it is the space between them
which is expanding, not the galaxies themselves.
The key idea is that it is the space between the galaxies (the rubber of the balloon)
which is getting bigger. In one sense the galaxies themselves are not moving around the
Universe – they would be in exactly the same place on the balloon if it was let down
again.
This also explains why more distant galaxies seem to be moving away from us more
quickly. There is more space (balloon) between us and a distant galaxy so more space to
expand (see ‘You’re the Astrophysicist #1: Our Expanding Universe’ on page 29).
Hubble’s discovery that we live in an expanding universe led to the development of two
competing theories – the Steady State and Big Bang theories.
The Steady State theory, developed by the cosmologist Fred Hoyle, proposed that the
universe had always existed in a similar state to the way it appears nowadays. Although
stars and galaxies are born, evolve and die, the average numbers of each has always
remained the same. The average numbers of galaxies in our universe is the same no
matter which direction we look from the Earth and the Steady State theory was
suggesting that this symmetry extended to time itself, implying that our universe had no
beginning and would have no end.
The Big Bang theory proposed that around 13.8 billion years ago our universe existed in
an incredibly tiny space. It then began to expand very quickly – an event known as the
Big Bang and we can still see this expansion taking place today, although gravity has
brought matter together to create stars and galaxies in certain areas.
Through the 1950s there was a fierce debate amongst cosmologists as to which of these
two theories was the better explanation for the expanding universe. However, during the
1950s and 1960s there were two major discoveries which tipped the balance firmly in
favour of the Big Bang theory.
In 1965 two radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson detected a mysterious
‘background’ of radio waves with a wavelength of around 1mm (microwaves) which
appeared to be coming with equal strength from every direction in the universe. This
Cosmic Microwave Background radiation was quickly suggested to be left over from the
Big Bang12 itself. The strength and wavelength of the CMBR was also shown to be
consistent with a Big Bang which took place 13.8 billion years ago.
Figure 16: Map of the CMBR. This image shows the tiny variations in the intensity of the Cosmic
Microwave Background Radiation, as measured by the European Space Agency’s Planck satellite in
2013. The tiny variations in the CMBR were the product of fluctuations which took place close to
the very beginning of our universe. (Image: © NASA/European Space Agency, Planck
Collaboration)
In the late 1950s, as the power of telescopes increased, a number of extremely compact
objects with very large luminosities were discovered. They all had exceptionally high red-
shifts, suggesting that they were at enormous distances from the Earth and receding at
speeds close to the speed of light. Their exact nature was not clear and so they were
called QSOs or Quasi-Stellar Objects.
12
Sometimes rather misleadingly called the ‘echo’ of the Big Bang.
They are now known to be the nuclei of galaxies or Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs). The
importance of QSOs for the debate between the Big Bang and Steady State theories of
the universe is that they are only found at very great distances from the Earth – almost
at the edge of the observable universe. Whenever astrophysicists look out across great
distances in space they are effectively looking back in time. For example, when looking
at a galaxy at a distance of five million light years, astrophysicists are seeing it as it
appeared five million years ago, since its light will have taken five million years to reach
the Earth.
The nearest quasar is at a distance of 1.5 billion light years which means that they only
existed up until 1.5 billion years ago. This means that the Steady State theory’s idea
that the universe has always looked broadly the same cannot be true.
Consequently, the Big Bang theory is now the dominant theory in cosmology.
Checkpoint questions
1. Key terms
i) Doppler Effect,
ii) red-shift,
iii) CMBR,
iv) Big Bang theory.
The wavelengths of light from the Andromeda Galaxy are found to be shorter than
expected by 0.1%. This effect is known as ‘blue-shift’.
The orbital periods of the planets can show us how the strength of the Sun’s gravity
changes with their distance from the Sun. The table below shows some data about the
‘naked-eye13’ planets of our Solar System:
a) Plot a graph of these data, with Distance from the Sun along the horizontal axis
and Orbital Period on the vertical axis.
b) Draw a smooth curve through your points.
c) A student suggests that Orbital Period and Distance from the Sun are directly
proportional. Draw a straight line on your graph through the origin and the point
representing the Earth (1,1), showing how the results would appear if this was
true.
d) Which planets are orbiting more quickly than the Orbital Period predicted by the
‘proportional’ straight line?
e) Which planets are orbiting more slowly than the Orbital Period predicted by the
‘proportional’ straight line?
f) What do the answers to d) and e) tell you about the strength of the Sun’s gravity
close to and far away from the Sun?
Although you might expect Mercury to be the hottest planet, it is in fact Venus which has
the highest surface temperature. In addition, although Neptune is farthest from the Sun,
Uranus is the coldest! Can you find out the reasons for these two curious facts?
13
These are the planets which can be seen by the human eye on its own, without any optical aid such as
binoculars or a telescope. They have therefore been observed and their motion recorded since the very
earliest times.
The details of an object’s orbit can help to identify the object. The table below shows
some data about a range of objects in our Solar System.
a) Use the orbital data in the table to identify which of the objects A-F is:
i. Eris, a Trans-Neptunian Object,
ii. Earth,
iii. Jupiter,
iv. Halley’s Comet, which was visible from Earth in 1910 and 1986,
v. Comet Hale Bopp,
vi. an object from the Asteroid Belt, between Mars and Jupiter.
b) Which of the above objects is most likely to pass close to the Earth?
1. Identifying Stars
The light from a star can be analysed to allow astrophysicists to work out many of the
star’s physical properties, such as its mass, radius, temperature etc. In this way we can
find out which type of star it is.
The table below gives some data about some stars in our galaxy.
All Main Sequence stars are a balance between the force of gravity (trying to make them
smaller) and radiation pressure (trying to make them bigger). The table below shows the
strength of these two forces for several different sizes of a star.
a) Draw a graph of Radiation Pressure against Radius, using the data in the table
above.
b) Draw a graph of Gravitational Field Strength against Radius, using the data in the
table above.
c) A star is stable when the forces of gravity and radiation pressure are equal. Use
your graph to estimate the radius at which this star would be stable.
d) Compare your answer to c) with the Sun’s radius of 700 000 km and use this to
decide whether this star is more or less massive than the Sun.
The table below gives Spectral Class and Absolute Magnitude data for a range of stars.
a) Use these data to plot a graph of Absolute Magnitude (vertical axis) against
Spectral Class (horizontal axis), as shown below. Notice that each Spectral Class
is split up into ten divisions, numbered 0 to 9.
b) Draw a smooth curve to show the Main Sequence on your H-R Diagram.
c) Can you identify the following groups of stars on your H-R Diagram?
i. White Dwarf stars
ii. Blue Supergiant stars
iii. Red Giant stars
The diagram below shows some of Edwin Hubble’s results from his measurements of the
speeds of distant galaxies. By looking at the spectra from the light from each galaxy he
could see that their spectral lines had all moved towards the red end of the spectrum. In
other words they had been ‘red-shifted’. He also saw that the amount of red-shift was
greater for the more distant galaxies.
Figure 19: Hubble’s Results. Measurements of the speeds of galaxies outside the Local Group,
made by Edwin Hubble. Adapted from
http://www.atnf.csiro.au/outreach/education/senior/cosmicengine/hubble.html
a) Use these data to plot a graph of Speed of Recession against Distance from Earth.
b) Draw a smooth line or curve through your points.
c) The speed at which a galaxy at 1 Mpc (3.26 Mly) would be moving away from the
Earth is called the Hubble Constant (H). Use your graph to calculate a value for H.
d) In recent years, astrophysicists have made observations which suggest that the
value of H is increasing. What does this tell us about the behaviour of our
Universe?
Figure 20: The Cluster of Galaxies in the Constellation of Hydra. This was one of the most
distant sets of galaxies observed and measured by Edwin Hubble. At 724 million light years away
from the Earth they appear to be receding from us at 16500 km/s. The two bright stars to the
lower left and upper right of centre are stars in the Milky Way which happen to lie close to the ‘line
of sight’ to this galactic cluster. (Image: © Angus Lea/NASA)
When the expansion of the Universe was first discovered, two main theories were
proposed to explain it – the Steady State and Big Bang theories.
b) Use your completed table to explain why astrophysicists currently believe the Big
Bang Theory.
The simple model of a universe expanding rapidly from a Big Bang, with gravity pulling
material together to form stars and galaxies in some areas has undergone some
significant changes in recent years. The most notable have been the suggestion of Dark
Matter and Dark Energy, along with some observational evidence for them.
a) What effect does each of these ideas have on our expanding universe?
b) How might the ultimate future of our universe be affected by each one?
Specification coverage
This guide covers the following specification points (7.24-7.26), related to the nuclear
fusion reaction within stars:
Students should:
7.24 describe nuclear fusion as the creation of larger nuclei resulting in a loss of mass
from smaller nuclei, accompanied by a release of energy
7.26 explain why nuclear fusion does not happen at low temperatures and pressures,
due to electrostatic repulsion of protons
Introduction
The rays of sunlight which reach us on Earth every day are the result of reactions
between nuclei deep in the core of the Sun. The cores of stars are the only places in the
universe where temperatures, pressures and densities are high enough to overcome the
electrostatic repulsion between protons, allowing them to fuse and generate the colossal
amounts of energy required to balance a star’s constant gravitational collapse. Since its
discovery in the 1930s physicists have been working to produce a reactor which will
allow this process to happen in a controlled way on the Earth, thus providing large
amounts of sustainable energy.
Background Information
In 1862 the physicist William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) made an estimate of the
maximum possible age of the Sun and therefore the Solar System and the Earth14. Using
the idea of a chemical fuel for the Sun, he calculated that the Sun could not last for more
than a few thousand years.
We now know that the Sun is actually millions of times older than this estimate – around
4.5 billion years old. Lord Kelvin obviously assumed that the Sun’s internal energy
source was based on a chemical reaction whereas we know nowadays that the Sun is
powered by nuclear reactions which generate millions of times more energy from every
kilogram of fuel.
14
Kelvin was firmly opposed to Charles Darwin’s proposal of his theory of evolution and used these short
estimates for the age of the Sun and Earth as strong evidence to the contrary.
Kelvin was unsure of the Sun’s energy source and could not have known anything about
nuclear energy. He assumed that the Sun was using a chemical reaction like the
combustion of coal, which can generate 32.5 MJ/kg.
a) If the Sun has a mass of 2 x 1030 kg, estimate the total amount of chemical
energy which could be contained in the Sun.
The Sun radiates energy at the rate of 4 x1 026 W, which means that it radiates around
4 x 1026 joules of energy every second.
b) Use this figure to obtain a value for the number of seconds which the Sun could
last for.
c) Convert this into years (1 year = 31 600 000 s).
Some chemical reactions can produce more energy than the combustion of coal. One
example is the reaction of hydrogen and oxygen to form water, which generates
143 MJ/kg.
d) Use this increased figure for the energy generated by each kilogram of the Sun to
calculate a longer estimate tor its lifetime.
The energy density of the nuclear fusion reaction is around 337 000 000 MJ/kg.
e) Does this result in a more realistic figure for the lifetime of the Sun?
Humans have been releasing the chemical energy stored by the electrons orbiting at the
edge of atoms for millions of years through chemical reactions such as combustion. In
the 1930s physicists discovered how to release the nuclear energy stored in the nucleus
of an atom. Two methods were discovered:
1) Fission. This involves making large nuclei such as Uranium split into smaller
nuclei.
2) Fusion. This involves forcing light nuclei such as Hydrogen together to form
heavier ones.
The amount of energy released from each kilogram of a material undergoing these
nuclear reactions is many millions of times larger than that released by even the most
violent chemical reaction. This explains how the Sun is able to maintain its enormous
energy output for such an unimaginably long time.
In simple terms the process involves fusing two isotopes of hydrogen together. These
two isotopes are:
Hydrogen-1 – the most common form of hydrogen. This nucleus simply contains
a single proton
As shown below, when nuclei of these two isotopes of hydrogen meet under the right
conditions, they can fuse together to form a nucleus containing two protons and one
neutron which is an isotope of helium. This reaction releases enormous amounts of
energy.
Nuclear fusion only occurs when hydrogen is at very high temperatures and pressures.
The main reason for this is that the protons in a hydrogen-1 and deuterium nucleus are
both positively charged. Their like charges will therefore repel each other as a result of
the electrostatic force.
When two protons are extremely close together, such as in a nucleus, they are tightly
held together by the Strong Nuclear Force which attracts all protons and neutrons
together. However, the Strong Nuclear Force only acts over extremely short distances
and so, up until the point where the two nuclei are almost touching, the Electrostatic
force is much stronger.
The solution to this problem is to ensure that the hydrogen is at a very high temperature
so that the nuclei are moving extremely fast. In this situation the electrostatic repulsion
does not have time to push them away from each other before they bump into each
other and are locked together by the Strong Nuclear Force.
Unfortunately this requires a temperature of at least 10 000 000K, which is why creating
the conditions for fusion to occur on the Earth continues to be a very difficult
technological problem.
One obvious place in nature where temperatures and pressures are high enough for the
nuclear fusion reaction is at the centre of stars. Here enormous gravitational forces
compress the star to the point where nuclear fusion can take place in its core. This
allows the star to produce the vast quantities of energy needed to balance the
gravitational collapse and form a stable or ‘Main Sequence’ stars.
It is obviously possible to fuse helium to form heavier elements such as lithium and so
on but this requires even greater temperatures which are only found in more massive
stars.
15
This is one area where physicists trying to create nuclear fusion on the Earth have a slight advantage over
stars. About 0.02% of sea water uses deuterium atoms instead of Hydrogen‐1 whereas stars take many
thousands of years to make deuterium by first fusing a proton and a neutron.
Amazingly, this means that all the natural elements on the Periodic Table with an atomic
number greater than 26 were formed in the immense explosion when a star becomes a
supernova. This explains why their abundances in the universe are so very low compared
with hydrogen and helium.
The enormous amounts of energy which can be released from plentiful materials such as
hydrogen have meant that physicists and engineers have been trying to produce a
reactor which can produce and sustain a controllable fusion reaction for many decades
now.
Some reactors have successfully fused small amounts of hydrogen into helium but to
date this has always involved putting in much more energy than has been released by
the fusion reaction. A working power station generating electricity from the fusion of
hydrogen nuclei may still be many years in the future.
Although their ‘discovery’ of ‘Cold’ Fusion created great excitement around the world it was soon
discovered to be incorrect.
a) Research the topic of cold fusion.
b) Compare the way in which cold fusion was investigated with the usual way in which
scientists check a new discovery.
NASA
The ‘For Educators’ section of the NASA website contains a wide range of resources to
support the teaching of the astrophysical concepts within this topic.
www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/index.html
The ‘Information for Schools & Teachers’ page of the RAS website provides access to a
range of resources to support the teaching of many astrophysical topics. In particular the
RAS’s downloadable leaflet on Gravity relates directly to this topic.
www.ras.org.uk/education-and-careers/for-schools-and-teachers
This historic site contains exhibits and activities related to the astrophysical topics
covered in this guide. Further details at: www.rmg.co.uk/royal-observatory
The STFC provides a number of activities and resources to support the teaching of many
of the concepts covered in this topic. Further details can be found at:
www.stfc.ac.uk/public-engagement/activities-for-schools/
Woolsthorpe Manor
The Lincolnshire farmhouse where Isaac Newton was born and grew up is open to the
public and includes a Visitors’ Centre with many displays and demonstrations relating to
his work on motion and gravity. Further details are available on the National Trust
website: www.nationaltrust.org.uk/woolsthorpe-manor