Compaction Characteristics of Prominent Agricultural Soils in Borno State of Nigeria
Compaction Characteristics of Prominent Agricultural Soils in Borno State of Nigeria
Compaction Characteristics of Prominent Agricultural Soils in Borno State of Nigeria
Vol. 30(6):November-December, 1987 © 1987 American Society of Agricultural Engineers 0001-2351/87/3006-1575$02.00 1575
TABLE 1. THE PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSES, THE LIQUID AND maximum standard deviation of 3 % . These plotted
PLASTIC LIMITS OF LOAMY SAND AND SANDY LOAM SOILS values were found to increase with higher compaction
Liquid Plastic
effort. The maximum densities of sandy loam at 5, 10
Sand, Silt, Clay, limit, limit, and 15 Proctor compaction blows were found to be 1.64,
Soil type % % % % % 1.67 and 1.69 Mg/m^ respectively, at an optimum
moisture content of 16%; while those of loamy sand for
Loamy sand 90 5 5 16.20 12.11
Sandy loam 70 19 11 30.08 16.00
the same treatments were 1.66, 1.69, 1.73 Mg/m^
respectively, at optimum moisture content of 12.5%.
The higher maximum densities of the loamy sand at all
compaction levels with a lower optimum moisture level is
TABLE 2. THE SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF
LOAMY SAND AND SAND LOAM SOILS not unexpected, since the loamy sand has a higher
AT ALL COMPACTION LEVELS percentage of sand particles than the sandy loam. This
shows that the loamy sand is more susceptible to
Treatments Sandy loam Loamy sand compaction and since the plasticity index of the loamy
Compaction Mean Mean
sand soil was found to be less than that of the sandy
levels, K-value, density, K-value, density, loam, the lower optimum moisture for the proctor
blows X 10"^ mm/s Mg/m^ X 10"^ mm/s Mg/m^ compaction of the loamy sand is adequate. This is in line
with the study of Johnson et al. (1983) who found that the
5 33.47* 1.64 34.12 1.66 proctor density of soil mixtures was linearly correlated
10 27.54 1.67 29.62 1.69
15 23.63 1.69 27.59 1.73
with the liquid limit and the percent sand (% sand).
The penetration resistance-moisture content
*Mean of four replicate values. Standard deviation = 4%. relationships (Fig. 2) show an increase in penetration
resistance up to a maximum and then a decrease as the
water content of the soils increased. This expected
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS because penetration resistance depends upon the bulk
The results of the grain size analyses, consistency density and the water content of the soils. As the
limits and the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the compaction levels increased, the peak of the penetration
soils tested are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Organic resistance of the two soils increased. But the penetration
matter content of the sandy loam and loamy-sand soils resistance of the sandy loam at all compaction levels are
were 2% and 3% organic carbon respectively. higher than that of loamy sand. This is probably due to
It can be seen from the particle size analyses that the the higher percentage of clay in the sandy loam.
sandy loam has relatively larger specific surface than the However, the maximum cone index does not occur at the
loamy sand based on the total percentages of silt, and moisture content that produces the maximum dry
clay particles in the two soils. The plasticity index of the density for all the compaction levels. This phenomenon
sandy loam is higher than that of loamy sand because of has been observed in other parts of the world by Knight
the higher silt and clay contents and the lower sand (1948), Smith (1964), Ayers and Perumpral (1982) and
content in the sandy loam. Ohu (1985). At all compaction levels, an increase in the
From the results of compaction tests, the dry bulk percentage of clay in the sandy loam was found to raise
density versus moisture content relationships for the two the moisture content at which the maximum cone index
soils are shown in Fig. 1. The plotted points are the occurs (Fig. 2). The cone index values of loamy sand
average of four replicates at each moisture content with a were significantly lower than those observed for sandy
175
5 BLOWS 10 BLOWS 15 BLOWS
1-7
X
0
V6
o
CD A »-«—«
•^•^«
LOAMY
SANDY LOAH
SAND
1-5 1 • i J
10 15 20 5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20
Moistur^ content (%)
Fig. 1—Dry density vs. moisture content of loamy sand and sandy loam soils at different compaction levels.
5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20
Moisture Content (V«)
Fig. 2—Penetration resistance vs. moisture content of loamy sand and sandy loam soils at different compaction levels.
loam that contains a higher percentage of clay. For a Soil survey Bulletin. Institute for Africultural Research, Samaru
Ahmadu Bello University, NO. 40, 41 pp.
given soil type, an increase in compaction effort 4. Casagrnade, A. 1948. Classification and identification of soils.
produced an increase in maximum cone index attained Trans. Amer. Soc. of Civil Engineers 113:901.
as shown in Fig. 2. 5. Dawkins, T. C. K. 1983. Crop reaction to compaction. Soil and
In Table 2, it can be seen that higher compaction Water ll(l):31-33.
levels decreased the saturated hydraulic conductivity of 6. Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and water: Physical principles and
processes. Academic Press, New York, 431 p.
the two soils tested. This is because greater effort 7. Johnson, C. E., D. W. Wright and A. C. Bailey 1983.
introduced in compacting the soils resulted in a decrease Compaction characteristics of some soil mixtures. TRANSACTIONS
in the total porosity of the soils and an increase in the of the ASAE 26(5): 1337-1339.
proportion of microporosity relative to macroporosity. 8. Knight, S. J. 1948. Traficability of soils—laboratory tests to
determine effects of moisture contents and density variations. Tech.
Similarly, the loamy sand and higher sand percentage Memo. No. 3-240, 1st Supplement. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways
has higher conductivity values than the sandy loam at all Exp. Statu Vicksburg, MS,
compaction levels. This is due to the high proportion of 9. Lambe, T. W. 1951. Soil testing for engineers. John Willey and
large pores in the loamy sand which permits a more rapid Sons, Inc. New York. pp. 165.
movement of water through the soil. 10. McKyes, E., S. Nego E. Douglas, F. Taylor and G. S. U.
Raghavan 1979. The effect of machinery traffic and tillage on the
physical properties of clay and on yield of silage corn. J. Agric. Eng.
CONCLUSION Res. 24:143-148.
11. Maurya, P. R. 1985. Effect of tillage and residue management
Results from the study show that higher compaction on crop yield and physical properties of an irrigated soil in Northern
levels increase the penetration resistance, increase the Nigeria. Presented at the 10th Conference of International Soil Tillage
bulk density and decrease saturated hydraulic Research Organization. University of Guelph, Canada.
conductivity of the soils. The effect of compaction on the 12. Ohu, J. O. 1985. Peatmoss influence of strength, hydraulic
soils physical characteristics might explain the reason for characteristics and crop production of compacted soils. Ph. D. thesis,
McGill University, Canada.
decrease in yield of some crops in the Northern part of 13. Phillip, R. E. and D. Kirkham 1962. Soil compaction in the
Nigeria especially in a sandy loam soil due to some tillage field and corn growth. Agron. J. 54: 29-34.
practices as stated by Maurya (1985). Further studies on 14. Raghavan, G. S. V., E. McKyes, G. Gendron B. Borghum and
the effect of contract pressure of farm machinery on the H. H. Lee 1978. Effect of soil compaction on the development and yield
physical characteristics of many agricultural soils and of corn (maize). Can. J. Plant sci. 58:435-443.
15. Raghavan, G. S. V., E. McKyes, F. Taylor, P. Richard and A.
crop yield in Nigeria will be necessary in planning soil Watson 1979. Vehicular traffic effects on development and yield of
management for better crop production. This is corn (maize). J. of Terramechanics 16(2):69-76.
especially true since Skromme (1985) suggested animal 16. Raghavan, G. S. V. and J. O. Ohu 1985. Prediction of static
powered mechanization in many parts of Nigeria as equivalent pressure of proctor compaction blows. TRANSACTIONS of
opposed to machinery mechanization. the ASAE 28(5): 1398-1400.
17. Saini, G. R., T. L. Chow and I. Ghanem 1984. Compactibility
indexes of some agricultural soils of New Brunswick, Canada. Soil Sci.
137(l):33-38.
References 18. Skromme, L. H. 1985. Agricultural mechanization in Nigeria.
1. ASAE 1982. Soil cone penetrometers, ASAE 313.1 ASAE Paper No. 85-5047. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI 49085.
Agricultural engineers yearbook. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI 49085, 19. Smith, J. C. 1964. Strength—moisture—density relations of
pp.246-247. fine grained soils in vehicle mobility research. Tech. Report No.
2. Ayers, P. D. and J. V. Perumpral 1982. Moisture and density 3—639. U.S. Engineer Waterways Exp. Station Vicksburg, MS.
effect on cone index. TRANSACTIONS of the ASAE 25(5):1169-1172. 20. Soil Survey Staff 1978. Soil taxonomy. Soil Cons. Serv., U.S.
3. Carrol, D. M. 1974. The soils of the Maiduguri—Bama area. Dept. Agriculture.