Ufc 4 211 01n 2004
Ufc 4 211 01n 2004
Ufc 4 211 01n 2004
25 October 2004
ED
DESIGN:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
L
HANGARS: TYPE I AND TYPE II
EL
C
AN
C
1
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use.
Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright
holder.
ED
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
L
AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY
EL
Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/)
This UFC supersedes (in part) Military Handbook 1028/1C, dated 1 April 1999.
i
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
FOREWORD
The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides
planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies
to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance
with USD(AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and
work for other customers where appropriate.
UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to
users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military
construction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities
Engineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Support Agency (AFCESA) are
ED
responsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies should contact the
preparing service for document interpretation and improvements. Technical content of UFC is
the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. Recommended changes with supporting
rationale should be sent to the respective service proponent office by the following electronic
form: Criteria Change Request (CCR). The form is also accessible from the Internet sites listed
below.
L
UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the following
sources:
EL
• Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) Index http://65.204.17.188//report/doc_ufc.html.
• USACE TECHINFO Internet site http://www.hnd.usace.army.mil/techinfo/.
• NAVFAC Engineering Innovation and Criteria Office Internet site http://dod.wbdg.org/.
• Construction Criteria Base (CCB) system maintained by the National Institute of Building
Sciences at Internet site http://www.ccb.org/.
C
Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the current
electronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current.
AUTHORIZED BY:
AN
______________________________________ ______________________________________
DONALD L. BASHAM, P.E. DR. JAMES W WRIGHT, P.E.
Chief, Engineering and Construction Division Chief Engineer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Naval Facilities Engineering Command
C
______________________________________ ______________________________________
KATHLEEN I. FERGUSON, P.E. Dr. GET W. MOY, P.E.
The Deputy Civil Engineer Director, Installations Requirements and
DCS/Installations & Logistics Management
Department of the Air Force Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
(Installations and Environment)
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
CONTENTS
Page
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
ED
1-3 FACILITY PLATES ............................................................................ 2
1-4 PLANNING CRITERIA....................................................................... 2
1-5 BUILDING FUNCTIONS .................................................................... 2
1-6 ENERGY CONSERVATION .............................................................. 3
1-7 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ...................................................... 3
1-7.1 AFFF Disposal ................................................................................... 3
1-8 FIRE PROTECTION .......................................................................... 3
L
1-9 ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION (ATFP) ......................... 3
1-10 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN ................................................................... 4
1-11
EL
ACCESSIBILITY ................................................................................ 4
1-12 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS CONCEPT DESIGN (FACD)................... 5
1-13 DESIGN ISSUES............................................................................... 5
1-14 ACOUSTICS...................................................................................... 5
1-15 PROTECTED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ........................................ 5
1-16 TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS............. 5
1-17 WEAPONS AND AMMUNITION STORAGE ..................................... 6
C
2-7 WINDS............................................................................................... 7
2-8 ACCESSIBILITY FOR THE DISABLED............................................. 8
2-9 SECURITY FENCING ....................................................................... 8
2-10 LANDSCAPE PLANTING .................................................................. 8
2-11 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS..................................... 8
2-12 UTILITIES .......................................................................................... 8
2-12.1 Underground Lines ............................................................................ 8
2-13 SECURITY......................................................................................... 8
2-14 STORM DRAINAGE .......................................................................... 9
2-15 WATER SERVICE ............................................................................. 9
2-16 SANITARY SEWER........................................................................... 9
2-17 AFFF CONTAINMENT ...................................................................... 9
2-18 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ............................ 9
i
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
2-18.1 Street System .................................................................................... 9
2-18.2 Sidewalks........................................................................................... 9
CHAPTER 3 ARCHITECTURAL
3-1 GENERAL.......................................................................................... 10
3-2 HANGAR BAY (TYPE I HANGAR) .................................................... 10
3-3 HANGAR BAY (TYPE II HANGAR) ................................................... 10
3-4 O1 SHOPS AND MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION ..................... 11
3-5 O2 SQUADRON ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS ............... 11
3-6 CONSTRUCTION FEATURES.......................................................... 11
3-7 HANGAR ........................................................................................... 11
3-8 SURFACE TREATMENT................................................................... 12
ED
3-8.1 Specular Reflectance......................................................................... 12
3-8.2 Operational Hazard Glare.................................................................. 12
3-9 WALL PANELS.................................................................................. 12
3-10 ROOF SYSTEMS .............................................................................. 12
3-10.1 Systems to Consider.......................................................................... 13
3-10.2 Other Alternatives .............................................................................. 13
3-10.3 Criteria to Consider............................................................................ 13
L
3-11 HANGAR DOORS ............................................................................. 13
3-11.1 Horizontal Sliding Hangar Doors ....................................................... 13
3-11.2 Vertical Lift Fabric Doors ................................................................... 14
EL
3-12 PERSONNEL DOORS ...................................................................... 15
3-13 SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOORS ................................................... 15
3-14 OVERHEAD ROLLING SERVICE DOORS ....................................... 15
3-15 NATURAL LIGHT .............................................................................. 15
3-15.1 Translucent Panels ............................................................................ 15
3-15.2 Windows ............................................................................................ 15
C
3-16 LOUVERS.......................................................................................... 15
3-17 HANGAR BAY FLOOR FINISH ......................................................... 15
3-18 O1 LEVEL (SHOPS AND MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION) ...... 16
3-18.1 Exterior Wall Construction ................................................................. 16
AN
ii
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
3-21.3 Windows ............................................................................................ 19
3-21.4 Miscellaneous .................................................................................... 19
3-22 INTERIOR MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS.......................................... 19
3-22.1 Walls and Partitions ........................................................................... 19
3-22.2 Stairs.................................................................................................. 19
3-22.3 Doors and Frames ............................................................................. 20
3-22.4 Hardware ........................................................................................... 20
3-22.5 Windows and Glazing ........................................................................ 20
3-22.6 Finishes ............................................................................................. 20
3-22.7 Additional Architectural Requirements............................................... 21
3-23 WEIGHT HANDLING EQUIPMENT................................................... 22
3-23.1 Bridge Cranes.................................................................................... 22
ED
CHAPTER 4 STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS
4-1 GENERAL.......................................................................................... 40
4-2 MAIN STRUCTURAL FRAMING SYSTEMS ..................................... 40
4-2.1 Cantilevered System.......................................................................... 40
4-2.2 Header Truss System ........................................................................ 40
4-3 MATERIALS ...................................................................................... 41
L
4-3.1 Weathering Steel ............................................................................... 41
4-3.2 Hollow Structural Sections................................................................. 41
4-4 STRENGTH AND SERVICEABILITY REQUIRMENTS..................... 42
EL
4-4.1 Gravity loads...................................................................................... 42
4-4.2 Wind Loads........................................................................................ 42
4-4.3 Seismic Loads ................................................................................... 43
4-4.4 Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (ATFP) ............................................ 44
4-5 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION ...................... 44
4-5.1 Thermal Loads................................................................................... 44
C
4-5.2 Additional Cantilever Requirements .................................................. 44
4-5.3 Static Determinacy............................................................................. 45
4-5.4 Miscellaneous Considerations ........................................................... 45
4-5.5 Construction and Erection ................................................................. 45
AN
5-1 GENERAL.......................................................................................... 51
5-2 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM ........................................................ 51
5-3 FLOOR DRAINAGE........................................................................... 51
5-4 DRAFT CURTAINS ........................................................................... 51
5-5 O1/O1 LEVEL SPACES .................................................................... 51
5-6 FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS ................................................................... 51
5-6.1 Hangar Bay Flame Detection............................................................. 51
5-7 EMERGENCY SHUT-OFF STATIONS.............................................. 52
5-8 FIRE PUMPS..................................................................................... 52
5-9 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM PROTECTION .......................................... 52
iii
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
5-10 WATER SUPPLY............................................................................... 52
5-11 LIFE SAFETY .................................................................................... 52
6-1 HEATING........................................................................................... 57
6-1.1 Infiltration Rate................................................................................... 57
6-1.2 Space Thermometer .......................................................................... 57
6-1.3 Snow-Melting System ........................................................................ 57
6-1.4 Under Floor Heating System ............................................................. 57
6-1.5 Automatic Thermostatic Control ........................................................ 57
6-1.6 Heating Zones ................................................................................... 57
6-1.7 Design Conditions.............................................................................. 57
ED
6-1.8 Cold Jet Destratifiers ......................................................................... 57
6-2 SYSTEM SELECTION....................................................................... 57
6-3 VENTILATION ................................................................................... 58
6-3.1 Toxic Fumes ...................................................................................... 58
6-3.2 Fuel.................................................................................................... 58
6-4 AIR CONDITIONING ......................................................................... 58
6-5 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS ............................... 58
L
6-5.1 Corrosion Protection .......................................................................... 58
6-6 FORCE PROTECTION...................................................................... 58
6-7 PLUMBING ........................................................................................ 59
EL
6-8 COMPRESSED AIR .......................................................................... 59
6-9 NOISE AND VIBRATION CONTROL ................................................ 59
6-10 DESIGN TEMPERATURES............................................................... 59
FIGURES
Figure Title
ED
3-1 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Hangar OH/O1Space ................................ 23
3-2 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Maintenance Hangar OH Space ............... 24
3-3 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Two Squadron First Floor Plan (01) .......... 25
3-4 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Two Squadron Second Floor Plan (02) ..... 26
3-5 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Single Squadron First Floor (01) ............... 27
3-6 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Single Squadron Second Floor (02) .......... 28
L
3-7 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Hangar Section ......................................... 29
3-8 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Building Requirements .............................. 30
3-9 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Aircraft Data .............................................. 31
EL
3-10 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Hangar OH-O1 Space.............................. 32
3-11 Maintenance Hangar Type II – OH Floor Plan .......................................... 33
3-12 Maintenance Hangar Type II – 01 Floor Plan............................................ 34
3-13 Maintenance Hangar Type II – 02 Floor Plan............................................ 35
3-14 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Pocket Space ........................................... 36
3-15 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Hangar Section ........................................ 37
C
3-16 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Building Requirements ............................. 38
3-17 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Aircraft Data ............................................. 39
4-1 Hangar Clear Span Roof Costs................................................................. 47
AN
v
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1-1 SCOPE. This UFC contains criteria for the design of Navy and Marine
Corps aircraft maintenance hangars for organizational (“O”) and intermediate (“I”) level
maintenance to support the Naval Aviation Maintenance Program in accordance with
Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV), OPNAVINST 4790.2, The Naval Aviation
Maintenance Program (NAMP). Major aircraft overhaul is normally done at Naval
Aviation Depots (NADEPs.)
ED
carrier aircraft, but is adaptable to meet requirements for rotary wing and various types
of smaller aircraft. The O1 and O2 level spaces in this type of hangar are configures for
a typical strike fighter squadron, two carrier airborne early warning squadrons, or a
helicopter antisubmarine warfare squadron.
L
a patron squadron, but is adaptable for larger aerial refueling and transport aircraft. The
O1 and O2 level spaces are designed to accommodate a typical marine aerial refueling
and transport squadron or patrol squadron.
EL
1-1.3 Other Aircraft Facilities. Criteria for the design of paint and corrosion
control hangars and other aircraft facilities are not contained in this UFC, but will be
included in future UFCs. Until these documents are published, continue to use the
criteria of Military Handbook 1028/1C for these facilities.
C
1-1.4 Other Services’ Hangar Facilities. For Army or Air Force hangars, use
UFC 3-260-01, Airfield and Heliport Design and Planning, and specific direction
provided by the respective headquarters command.
AN
officers of shore activities from project definition through the entire design effort of any
project related to the construction, repair, or modernization of aircraft organizational and
intermediate facilities (refer to Volume 1 of OPNAVINST 4790.2). This ensures that
technical requirements for specific aircraft maintenance and testing procedures as
outlined in Naval Air (NAVAIR) technical manuals receive proper consideration in the
design of these facilities. Specific aircraft data can be obtained from the Aircraft
Characteristics Database at http://www.uscost.net/aircraftcharacteristics/.
1
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
1-3 FACILITY PLATES. Facility plates show conceptual data that shows key
features of the hangar module, functional layouts, design data and similar pertinent
data. Plates are furnished as a design guide to assist in planning a new facility. Plates
are representative of a generic type of hangar for a possible squadron layout.
Variations to the plans are to be determined by the using activity, the design activity,
and the designer of record during the development of the design. Squadrons operate
differently based on the type of aircraft maintained, the type of squadron, and other
specific operational criteria. The responsibility of the design rests with the designer of
record.
ED
maintenance concepts depend increasingly on state-of-the-art computer technology.
Planning factors in NAVFAC P-80, Facility Planning Criteria for Navy and Marine Corps
Shore Installations, and design criteria included in NAVFAC and DoD criteria manuals
are guides that must be used with specific weapons system Facilities Requirement
Documents (FRD) to design a fully usable aviation facility. NAVAIR Facilities
Management Division, Fleet Support Branch, works with the weapons systems
developers to identify unique aviation facility requirements. NAVAIR engineering
L
personnel are available during design and construction to provide specialized expertise
to NAVFAC or to arrange for weapons system manufacturers' representatives to attend
design reviews if requested by NAVFAC Engineering Field Divisions (EFDs), NAVFAC
EL
Engineering Field Activities (EFAs) or aviation facility users.
• AIMD Administration,
AN
• Airframes Shop,
• Engine Maintenance,
• Avionics Shop,
C
ED
NAVFAC Engineering Innovation and Criteria Office (EICO). Refer to UFC 3-240-02,
Design: Domestic Wastewater Control and UFC 4-832-01N, Design: Industrial and Oily
Wastewater Control.
L
alteration of the process or plant operation to reduce pollutant loading. The greater the
volume of wastewater to be treated and the greater the amount of contaminant to be
removed or destroyed, the higher the capital, labor, and material costs required. As a
EL
result, it is often economical to eliminate or reduce the quantity of waste at its source
prior to treatment or in place of treatment. Several possible techniques exist including
process change, material recovery, segregation, and water reuse. Sometimes, with
only partial purification, spent water can be reused, once or several times, in the
industrial process. Water unsuitable for direct reuse may be serviceable for a different
purpose, in which quality requirements are less restrictive.
C
Often, there are a number of alternatives that can achieve the desired
result. Therefore, a major objective of the preliminary studies should be to determine
AN
what combinations of actions are the most cost effective and technically and
operationally feasible.
1-7.1 AFFF Disposal. The disposal of spent aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)
is dependent upon the water treatment facilities that would treat the effluent from the
discharge site. Depending upon the facility’s location, AFFF may require onsite
containment. Verify AFFF containment requirements with the appropriate NAVFAC
C
environmental engineer.
1-8 FIRE PROTECTION. Fire Protection criteria are in Chapter 4 of this UFC.
See also paragraphs 2-2, 2-9 and 4-4.4 for further requirements
concerning ATFP.
ED
• Recycled content – utilizing recycled materials
L
products
EL
• Life Cycle costs and maintenance requirements – evaluation of useful life
versus first cost.
Cost for sustainable design features are incorporated into all MILCON
C
projects. Coordinate the requirements of appendix A of the contract. Buildings may be
required to obtain a certification developed by the U. S Green Building Council
(USGBC). Information concerning the Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design
AN
the UFAS requirements need to be incorporated into the design. The designer should
consider waiving, in whole or in part, the accessibility features of the design if requested
by the activity. If the activity requests that accessibility requirements be waived, a letter
must be sent to the design agency. Submit a waiver request per MIL-STD-3007C,
Standard Practice for Unified Facilities Criteria and Unified Facilities Guide
Specifications. Include a supporting letter, signed by the base commander, certifying
that the facility will only be used by able-body military personnel with the waiver request.
A sample of this supporting letter is attached in Appendix C.
4
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Regardless, consider the incorporation of accessibility features into the
design of the facility. Such features include:
• Accessible entrances.
See also paragraph 2-8 and Chapter 3 for further discussion regarding
hangar accessibility requirements.
ED
1-12 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS CONCEPT DESIGN (FACD). The design of
the hangar can be enhanced by the incorporation of a Functional Analysis Concept
Design or FACD. The FACD brings all of the design team (Design Agent, Activity,
Owners, A/E) and other interested parties to participate in project development and the
design process. The FACD generally takes place over a 10-day period and results in
the conceptual design of the project being approved by all participants of the FACD.
L
For guidance on this process, contact the NAVFAC Engineering Innovation and Criteria
Office (EICO.)
EL
1-13 DESIGN ISSUES. A list of issues in questionnaire format is attached as
Appendix B to provide assistance to the A/E and the Activity in the planning and design
of the hangar.
of heavier materials that would be helpful in reducing noise transmission into the
building will impact the cost of the facility. Consider performing an acoustical study to
evaluate the construction requirements that will be appropriate for the base.
building layout, construction of partitions, hardware requirements and other items. The
activity must identify their requirements and coordinate with the appropriate
publications.
5
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
and Marine Corps Intranet Construction Standards.
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
6
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
CHAPTER 2
CIVIL DESIGN
ED
2-2 ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION. Use standoff criteria
in UFC 4-010-01.
L
2-4 APPEARANCE. Locate HVAC equipment, meters, poles,
transformers, vaults, pressure reducing station piping and valving, and other
EL
utility items so that they do not detract from the building's appearance. Design
should also reduce the negative visual impact of utility items and communication
lines.
2-6 ENERGY CONCERNS. Consider the effect of local sun angles and
wind conditions on the hangar.
7
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
entrance and windows, intake and exhaust vents) to compensate for these
adverse conditions, including snow. Consider prevailing and seasonal wind
conditions as well.
ED
security or the protection of life, separation of a construction site from operational
facilities, isolation of a hazardous area, or as stipulated by the Base Security
Department.
L
vegetation should be retained whenever practical. Landscape design should
avoid planting next to the hangar that would permit concealment in accordance
with criteria set forth in UFC 4-010-01. As hangars are generally in industrial
EL
areas, limit landscaping to entrances and other public areas.
8
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
or sabotage.
2-15 WATER SERVICE. Provide water service loop with proper valving
to maximize reliability.
ED
2-16 SANITARY SEWER. Coordinate hangar elevations with the
existing sanitary sewer elevation to avoid the need for ejection pumps where
feasible. Capture oily wastewater contaminants from the hangar bay trench
system with oil/water separators.
L
2-17 AFFF CONTAINMENT. Runoff from the hangar bay (OH space)
trenches during activation of the AFFF system should be automatically routed to
a containment system. Overflow from the containment system should be
EL
discharged to either the sanitary sewer system or the storm drain system as
directed by the department overseeing environmental policy for the installation.
Conditions for disposal will depend upon the capability and location of the facility
that would treat the effluent from the discharge site.
2-18.1 Street System. Coordinate design of the street system with the
overall traffic circulation plans for the installation as well as the adjacent road
AN
system. Provide convenient and safe vehicular access and circulation for
essential services, such as deliveries, trash and garbage collection, fire
protection, and maintenance and repair. Through traffic should be kept to a
minimum. Design in accordance with criteria set forth in UFC 4-010-01.
pedestrian traffic volume and accessible route criteria set forth in the current
versions of the UFAS and the ADAAG. The grades of walks will normally follow
the natural pitch of the ground except at locations where physically disabled
access is required.
9
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURAL
3-2 HANGAR BAY (TYPE 1 HANGAR). (See Figures 3-1 to 3-9 at end
of chapter.) The hangar bay provides “O” level maintenance to aircraft within the
hangar bay. O level maintenance includes removing engines, changing tires,
ED
etc. Layout of this space is determined by the planning documents for the
module configuration identified. The net area of the hangar bay is defined in the
module layout and is considered a fixed area. The hangar bay may not be
increased in size. Recent changes to the criteria have changed the depth of the
bay from 30 m (100 ft) clear to 26m (85 ft) clear. The change allows for
additional width, yet still allows for all Type I aircraft to be accommodated in the
L
hangar bay. Figure 3-9 shows the different types of Type I aircraft.
when the anticipation of use is low. See the structural section for additional
information and discussion concerning the types and designs of cranes.
35.1 m (115 feet) deep x 73.2 m (240 feet) wide. Criteria has not evaluated, nor
anticipated, any changes in the size of the Type II hangar bay for new aircraft
because final aircraft size is not available. Figure3-16 shows the different types
of Type II aircraft.
The minimum Type II height from the floor to the roof permanent
obstruction line is 13 m (42 ft). Note the bridge crane and supporting rail
structure are exempt from this requirement. Deviation from the standard hangar
height must be approved by Naval Facilities Engineering Command’s
Engineering Innovation and Criteria Office (NAVFAC EICO,) Naval Air Systems
10
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Command (NAVAIR) or Commander Naval Installations (CNI).
ED
rooms. Fighter squadrons have need for a specific shop to handle ejection
seats. Some squadrons are operated with small detachments and thus have
their own individual shops. Some squadrons have a “Line Shop” while others do
not. Discuss the operations of the squadron prior to starting design.
L
that provide for the administration of the squadrons maintenance activities.
spaces such as heads, lockers, and showers. Double module hangars may
share heads, lockers, showers and training rooms to provide for more useable
space for each squadron. As with the O1 level, discuss the operations of the
squadron prior to starting design.
11
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
adjacent buildings, and be protected from abuse, both interior and exterior.
Options for the exterior walls include:
3-7.2 Pre-finished metal wall panels outside and batt insulation with vinyl
scrim facing on the interior, concrete masonry unit wall, approximately 2.5 m (8
feet) high, on the interior side. The masonry wall provides for protection of the
exterior wall panels from the interior. Protect the exterior wall finish with some
form of barrier to prevent damage.
ED
3-7.3 Pre-finished metal wall panels outside and batt insulation with vinyl
scrim facing on the interior. Exterior panels will be protected with metal liner
panels, approximately 2.5 m (8 ft) high, on the interior side. Provide a guardrail
to protect the liner panel along walls exposed to the exterior.
L
3-8 SURFACE TREATMENT. The chemical properties of materials
and finishes for exterior surfaces should have the highest possible resistance to
the effects of weather and salt-corrosive atmosphere.
EL
3-8.1 Specular Reflectance. To prevent mirror-like reflections from
building surfaces to aircraft in flight, roofs and other external surfaces should
have a specular reflectance compatible with the location of the building on the
airfield.
C
3-8.2 Operational Hazard Glare. If the building is located so that glare
may be an operational hazard, the critical surfaces of the building should have a
light reflectance of not more than 10, measured at an angle of 85 degrees in
AN
3-9 WALL PANELS. Field assembled, insulated metal wall panels will
typically be the most cost effective. Other types of panels such as factory-
foamed panels may be provided as required to comply with the Base Exterior
Architectural Plan or to be compliant with the architectural theme already
established on adjacent facilities.
C
3-10 ROOF SYSTEMS. The roof system, due to large surface area and
proximity to operating aircraft, should be carefully selected. Insulation should be
provided as required to meet the energy budgets established. On built-up roofs,
the design should preclude carrying gravel or slag aggregate from the roof
surface by high winds or drainage to any area where aircraft operate. The color
of roof surfaces should be as described in this section. Provide gutter and
outrigger downspouts at the front of the hangar. Provide snow guards at the
front of the hangar in areas subject to heavy snowfall. Provide access from O2
level spaces to the low roof over the O1 and O2 spaces, and exterior access to
12
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
the high roof over the OH space through a secured access panel or hatch, to
prohibit unauthorized passage. Built-up roofing, insulation, and moisture
protection should conform to the applicable guide specifications listed at the
Whole Building Design Guide DoD page (http://dod.wbdg.org/.)
3-10.1.1 Metal roof deck with rigid insulation, smooth surface built-up roof
system or mineral surface modified bitumen roof system.
ED
system with smooth surface built-up roof system or mineral surface modified
bitumen roof system. Composite deck supplier should be responsible for
connection of lightweight material to deck.
3-10.1.3 Metal “acoustical” roof deck with rigid insulation and a structural
standing seam metal roof system. Consider using this system over the hangar
L
bay.
3-10.2.1 Other types of roof systems based on cost and energy savings can
be considered.
3-10.3 Criteria to Consider. Select the most suitable roof systems from
C
the following criteria:
3-10.3.1 Very low slope (minimum of 13 mm per 300 mm (1/2 inch per foot)).
Where roof slopes are 13 mm per 300 mm (1/2 inch per foot), decks should be
AN
stiff enough to prevent ponding, and a built-up roof should be smooth surfaced.
3-10.3.2 Sloped roofs (25 mm per 300 mm (1 inch per foot) or greater).
Roofing membrane, insulation, and moisture protection should be used only on
roofs with a slope of 25 mm per 300 mm (1 inch per foot) or greater.
C
3-10.3.3 Pitched roofs. Insulated metal roof panels should be used. Panels
should be pre-engineered or field-fabricated and filled with blanket or rigid
insulation with insulation blocks over purlins.
13
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
drainage. Intermittent drainage to hangar trench drains should be at 3 m (10 ft)
maximum.
ED
keep the cable system in good operating condition. Each drive unit should have
a release mechanism, and the doors should be provided with a means of
movement in the event of power failure. The normal mode of operation is an
electric drive and the minimum speed of door travel should be 0.3 m/s (60 fpm).
L
door leaf. Safety devices should be installed to prevent injury to personnel and
damage to equipment by moving door sections. If personnel access doors are
provided in the hangar door leaves, an interlock should be installed that will
EL
prevent operation of the hangar door leaves when the personnel access doors
are open and will halt the hangar door leaves in the event a personnel access
door is opened while the hangar door leaves are in operation. An alarm should
sound in conjunction with safety warning beacons when doors are in motion.
Sliding steel hangar doors should be in accordance with UFGS 08342N, Steel
C
Sliding Hangar Doors.
3-11.1.3 Configure hangar doors such that they are operable during power
outages, by either manual or electrical means. See paragraph 7.5.
AN
3-11.2.1 Design the doors so that in case of a power outage, the doors may
be operated by utilizing Auxiliary Power Units (APU) that are also used for
providing power to the aircraft. The design incorporates a static converter that
converts the 400 Hz power to 60 Hz used in the door motors. Operation
sequences are identified in the Electrical Basis of Design. Additionally, a
generator may be utilized to provide for the operation of the doors.
14
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
event of operational failure. For hangar openings wider than 45 m (150 feet), a
personnel exit door will be provided in the center of the bay for a fire exit as
required by NFPA 409, Aircraft Hangars.
ED
the hardware for the doors. Consider the use of continuous hinges for high use
doors.
L
3-14 OVERHEAD ROLLING SERVICE DOORS. Provide rolling service
doors in lieu of sectional overhead doors as needed. For exterior locations,
EL
provide insulated doors. For interior doors provide non-insulated. Provide motor
operators as requested by the activity. Provide fire rated doors as required.
use of translucent panels and should be considered for areas with high-heating-
degree days.
3-17 HANGAR BAY FLOOR FINISH. Use a high build epoxy coating
system on the hangar bay floor, as specified in MPI 212, Thin Film Flooring
System for Aircraft Maintenance Facilities. MPI 212 requires a two or three coat
flooring system with reflective topcoats consisting of a primer and a topcoat or
primer, mid-coat and topcoat. The mid-coat and topcoat must be of the same
material. This system is appropriate for use in aircraft maintenance hangars,
15
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
equipment maintenance shops and all other industrial floors where resistance to
abrasion, lubricants and fuel is required.
Note: An alternate floor coating for new construction is the White Dry Shake
System consisting of cement, pigment, special hardening admixtures, sand, and
gravel as the topping to achieve increased lighting levels. The Dry Shake must
be applied in strict conformance with the material suppliers written instructions.
ED
Use of a mechanical spreader is essential for a successful application. Contact
the NAVFAC Engineer Innovation and Criteria Office (EICO) for information.
L
assembled insulated metal panels with concrete masonry backup painted in shop
and mechanical areas. Interior partitions must be reinforced concrete masonry
partitions typical. Other exterior wall materials should be considered where the
EL
Base Standards require other materials.
3-18.2 Wall Panels. Insulated metal wall panels – field assembled, metal
furring on masonry with semi-rigid friction fit fiberglass insulation.
16
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
3-18.6 Miscellaneous Items. Provide a roof access hatch.
3-19.2 Walls and Partitions. First floor walls will be 200 mm (8 inch)
nominal reinforced concrete masonry units. Extend partitions to floor slab above
around shops and to ceiling in other locations. Partitions around administrative
areas may be gypsum wallboard on metal studs, except around shop areas.
ED
Partitions between hangar and O1/O2 spaces should be masonry. Choose
insulated partitions for acoustical control as needed. Partitions should be fire
rated as required by NFPA 409.
L
3-19.4 Doors & Frames. Choose metal doors with metal frames on the
O1 level. Doors around the Paraloft, aviation ordnance (AO,) aviation mechanics
EL
equipment (AME) or any space that may contain explosives must be compliant
for blast protection per the appropriate design guides. Such features may
include out-swinging doors and panic devices.
• Operations
C
• Secure Office
• Ready Room
17
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
change keys for individual doors. The building should have a grand master key
system.
3-19.6 Windows And Glazing (Interior). Choose single pane glass set in
metal wrap-around frames. Choose wire or tempered type as required by code
based on the opening rating. Use laminated glass for windows exposed by the
hangar bay. Thermal insulated glass should have a laminated glass pane on the
inside (occupied side) of the window assembly.
ED
For windows in 2-hour rated walls, provide a fire shutter or 2hr. fire-
rated windows.
L
be considered when evaluating finishes.
• Floors.
EL
• Shops, tool room, etc – Concrete with sealer or Epoxy
3-20.1 Bases.
C
3-20.3 Ceilings.
18
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
• Toilets and Locker rooms – Suspended gypsum wallboard
ED
applied directly to the metal studs. Other exterior wall materials should be
considered where the Base Standards require other materials.
3-21.2 Wall Panels. Use insulated metal wall panels – field assembled,
metal furring on masonry with semi-rigid friction fit fiberglass insulation.
Additionally, factory foamed panels will be provided in limited areas to provide
L
visual continuity to the adjacent buildings.
3-21.3 Windows. AMMA HC60: Use windows that are of fixed and
EL
operable type, thermally broken pre-finished aluminum with tinted, low –e glass.
Windows must include 25 mm (1 in) minimum insulated glazing to provide more
favorable sound transfer coefficient. Glazing will be laminated type and comply
with UFC 4-010-01 in portions of the building that qualify as inhabited, including
“inside” windows exposed by the hangar bay. Thermal insulated glass should
have a laminated glass pane on the inside (occupied side) of the window
C
assembly.
hangar roof.
3-22.3 Doors and Frames. Choose solid core wood with metal frame
doors on the O2 level. Choose oak or birch with a natural finish. Doors for fire
19
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
doors must be rated as required.
• CO office
• XO office
ED
• Operations
• Secure Office
• Ready Room
L
removable cores. Generally, all squadron spaces should be keyed alike with
change keys for individual doors. The building should have a grand master key
EL
system.
3-22.5 Windows and Glazing. Choose single pane glass set in metal
wrap around frames. Glass should be wire or tempered type as required by code
based on the opening rating. Use laminated glass for windows exposed by the
hangar bay. Thermal insulated glass should have a laminated glass pane on the
C
inside (occupied side) of the window assembly.
Control, provide fire-rated steel windows. Use wire glass or fire-rated glazing.
3-22.6 Finishes.
3-22.6.1 Floors
activity.
20
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
• Corridors – Resilient tile
3-22.6.2 Bases.
3-22.6.4 Ceilings.
ED
• Administrative Spaces, All Spaces on Second floor level –
Suspended Acoustical
L
• Equipment rooms, mechanical rooms – Exposed construction,
EL
painted.
3-22.7.1 Exterior.
C
3-22.7.2 Restrictions on the Use of Uncoated Aluminum
3-22.7.2.1 Seacoast. Aluminum roofing and siding should not be specified for
structures located within 16 km (10 miles) of the seacoast, due to salt deposition
AN
3-22.7.3 Exterior and Interior. The restrictions for the use of preformed
(corrugated) aluminum roofing and siding are applicable also to sandwich panel
and flat sheet construction of unprotected (uncoated) aluminum and to ribbed
aluminum extrusions. Consideration should also be given to the corrosion of
C
aluminum surfaces on the interior of structures due to salt deposits from salt-
laden air.
21
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
3-23 WEIGHT-HANDLING EQUIPMENT. The maintenance hangar
(OH) space should contain overhead bridge cranes and jib cranes in accordance
with MIL-HDBK-1038, Weight Handling Equipment and contain a bridge crane in
the OH space of each maintenance hangar module supporting helicopters,
propeller driven aircraft or the C-9, V-22 or AV-8 aircraft (see Aircraft
Characteristics Database, http://www.uscost.net/aircraftcharacteristics/ .
ED
bridge located 9 m (30 ft) from the rear bulkhead. Trolley and bridge should be
capable of operating at a slow speed of 0.07 to 0.1 m/s (15 to 20 ft/min) for
positioning loads and at a high speed for moving loads of 0.3 m/s (60 ft/min); the
hoist should be capable of operating at a slow speed of 0.01 to 0.02 m/s (3 to 4
ft/min) and at a high speed of 0.06 m/s (12 ft/min). Refer to UFGS 14637N,
Cranes, Overhead Electric, Underrunning (Under 20,000 Pounds).
L
3-23.1.1 Motor and Controls. Bridge, trolley and hoist controls should
provide for two-speed reversing of a two-speed, squirrel-cage motor. The
controls should be equipped with reduced voltage starting for the motors.
EL
Controls should be operable from the floor.
3-23.1.2 Hook Height. The hook height for bridge cranes should be as
required to lift engines and transmissions clear of aircraft. Minimum hook
clearance height (measured from the hangar floor to the hook at full retraction)
C
for hangars housing H-53E aircraft should be 8.2 meters (27 ft). All others
should have a minimum ceiling height of 7.6 m (25 ft) for Type I and 11.6 m (38
ft) for Type II.
AN
C
22
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-1 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Hangar OH/O1 Space
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
23
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-2 Maintenance Hangar Type I –Maintenance Hangar OH Space
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
24
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-3 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Two Squadron First Floor Plan
(01)
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
25
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-4 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Two Squadron Second Floor Plan
(O2)
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
26
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-5 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Single Squadron First Floor (O1)
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
27
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-6 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Single Squadron Second Floor
(O2)
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
28
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-7 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Hangar Section
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
29
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-8 Maintenance Hangar Type I – Building Requirements
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
30
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-9 Maintenance Hangar Type I –Aircraft Data
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
31
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-10 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Hangar OH/O1 Space
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
32
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-11 Maintenance Hangar Type II – OH Floor Plan
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
33
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-12 Maintenance Hangar Type II – O1 Floor Plan
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
34
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-13 Maintenance Hangar Type II – O2 Floor Plan
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
35
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-14 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Pocket Space
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
36
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-15 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Hangar Section
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
37
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-16 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Building Requirements
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
38
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 3-17 Maintenance Hangar Type II – Aircraft Data
L ED
EL
C
***
AN
***
C
*** - Consult with NAVAIR and EICO for special MMA Aircraft hangar
requirements
39
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
CHAPTER 4
STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS
4-1 GENERAL. Use a steel frame system for the modular structure of
the maintenance hangar. Use of a column-free roof structure over the hangar
bays allows for maximum maneuverability of aircraft within the hangar as well as
flexibility for future changes in base loading. Design the hangar to use
prefabricated components to the maximum extent practicable.
ED
other design disciplines as well as the needs of the future occupants, owners and
maintenance activities.
L
4-2.1.1 Advantages. The system is advantageous in that it provides a
column-free building face towards the aircraft flightline. This maximizes the
EL
usable flightline frontage while decreasing the number of obstructions to aircraft
movements. Additionally, the system provides the maximum flexibility for
structural expansion to either side of the hangar. However, if future expansion is
anticipated, other disciplines must consider such expansion in their design
development.
C
4-2.1.2 Disadvantages. A cantilevered system is an inefficient method for
supporting loads; is prone to larger deflections than other systems; and is more
difficult to erect. Thermal cycles are also more likely to result in larger deflections
AN
affecting door operation, but will not result in thermal stresses unless the system
is restrained in some unconventional manner. Additionally, the landward side of
the facility must have some provision for tension anchorage of the rear of each
cantilever. This anchorage may be in the form of massive dead-load or tension
earth anchorages (typically tension piles). A cantilevered system also requires a
more elaborate foundation.
C
4-2.2 Header Truss System. A header truss system spans the entire
flightline face of the building and either rests upon towers at each flightline corner
of the building or is continuous to the foundation. The remaining walls of the
hangar are conventionally framed. Lateral support is provided through the walls
40
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
and the truss supporting towers. Intermediate support to the truss is provided in
the plane of the roof through a diaphragm, dedicated horizontal truss bracing or a
combination of the two.
ED
(25 ft.) A header truss virtually precludes the use of expansion joints; therefore
the hangar door span may be limited by the thermal response of non-structural
components. However, a three-hinged arch system allows an expansion joint
along the centerline of the hangar bay and extends the practical thermal
expansion limit. The header truss system also requires that flightline frontage be
dedicated to structural supports. Finally, the potential expansion of the hangar is
L
constrained by the presence of towers and lateral load resisting systems.
4-3 MATERIALS.
Weathering steel should not be used at or below grade. Careful detailing should
be maintained throughout the design to ensure that weathering steel does not
trap and hold water. Pockets that hold water will not form the required oxide
coating that gives the steel its enhanced corrosion protection. In areas where
weathering steel is acceptable, proper detailing and use of materials should be a
requirement to prevent staining of adjacent building components.
41
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
steel use and minimization of exposed steel surfaces. The bi-axial strength
characteristics provide for enhanced erectibility and greater resistance to
progressive collapse resulting from localized damage. However, HSS
connections are more challenging to design and often more difficult to fabricate.
The design engineer should consider and clearly represent in the contract
drawings the difficulty of the HSS connections. Additionally, a greater reliance on
shop connections is the norm in HSS practice. The designer is encouraged to
consider the complications of transporting large, built-up elements to the site.
HSS connections may involve the use of welds that are not pre-approved and/or
more extensive weld testing than normally found on hot rolled steel construction.
ED
4-4 STRENGTH AND SERVICEABILITY REQUIREMENTS. Design
the overall structural system for wind uplift conditions peculiar to the site.
Provide a bridge crane in the OH space of each maintenance hangar module
supporting helicopters, propeller driven aircraft, or the C-9, V-22, or AV-8 aircraft.
In the future, H-53 will normally be housed in a type II hangar. If NAVAIR
headquarters makes special exception for housing an H-53 in a special modified
type I hangar, the minimum hook clearance must be 8.2 meters (27 feet). Do not
L
use bridge cranes in maintenance hangars supporting other types of aircraft
except in specialized instances approved by NAVFACENGCOM or when
specifically required by the Facility Requirement Document (FRD.)
EL
Requirements for the bridge crane, motor, and controls are given in par. 3-23. In
all cases, design the hangar roof support structure to accommodate the loading
from overhead bridge crane described in par. 3-23.1.
4-4.1 Gravity Loads. Gravity loads on the main structural frame should
C
be determined using UFC 1-200-01, supplemented by actual physical data of
known equipment and materials where appropriate. In determining design load
combinations for structures in which the dead load of one portion of the building
serves as stability enhancing function for another portion of the building (i.e.
AN
4-4.1.1 Factored Load Combinations. For any load case in which dead
load is factored with a coefficient exceeding unity, that portion of the dead load
serving to resist overturning should be factored with a 0.9 coefficient.
C
• Hangar doors fully open for winds up to 96 km/h (60 mph); design
as a “partially enclosed structure.”
• Hangar doors closed for winds above 96 km/h (60 mph) up to the
42
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
maximum wind velocity for the geographic area; design as an
“enclosed structure.”
ED
frame, not only in the loads applied but also in the fundamental choice of framing
system. For instance, an STMF system (per AISC) is limited to a span of 20 m
(65 ft). A combination of site condition, design approach and structural layout will
determine the AISC criteria.
L
asymmetries may result in expensive connection fabrication and testing
requirements or outright prohibition of the fundamental design. The facility
designers should investigate the seismic issues early in the design phase and
EL
plan the building’s geometry and structure accordingly.
for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 2 –
Commentary; and AISC Pub S341, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel
Buildings.
43
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
• (OMF) Ordinary Truss Moment Frame (Part 1, Sec 11)
ED
Drawing information should also include any anticipated shoring (methods and
points).
L
when selecting the final differential temperature range, as a minimum, a
temperature differential of 28°C (50°F) should be used for design. Pay particular
attention to the deflections caused by thermal effects. Some architectural fascia
EL
elements and weather seals around hangar doors are particularly vulnerable to
detrimental deflections. These thermal effects are a serviceability concern and
should be investigated using unfactored loads.
The Contractor must “level” the truss tips (above the hangar door)
AN
after all roof and supported materials have been installed into their
final positions. It is suggested that the primary adjustment system
be installed in the forestay (and the backstay if necessary), but
other systems are permissible. To level the truss tips, the
Contractor must survey the roof truss system to ensure the
structural system is performing as the designer intended. The
Contractor’s survey should be done during stable atmospheric
C
44
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
4-5.2.1 Hangar Doors. Hangar door guide systems are normally sized to
allow total roof truss live load deflection not to exceed 200 mm (8 inches). The
designer of record is responsible for coordinating the total anticipated roof
deflection with several potential door guide manufacturers to ensure that an
economical system is selected. For cantilever roof systems, the hangar door
guide system should have adjustment capability to allow for final leveling after all
loads are in place.
ED
into a constrained system) unless a careful investigation has been made into the
resulting load condition.
L
encouraged. The use of load indicating washers allows for more meaningful
inspection of the primary connections at a later time. In all cases, bolted
assemblies that require fasteners to be loosened in order to adjust the structure
EL
should have their bolts discarded and replaced before the construction is
complete.
4-5.5.1 Ground Assembly with Heavy Lift. While not unique to hangars,
lifts of pre-positioned, pre-assembled hardware weighing 27,000 to 45,000 kg (30
to 50 tons) are uncommon in most construction and typical of hangar
construction. Ground construction is typically the most common means selected
by contractors. Large cribbing is set immediately adjacent to the lift location and
leveled. Shims are set to adjust for elevation differences and to establish the
proper camber. The structural element is then constructed on top of the cribbing.
45
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Once completed, the entire element is lifted into place and the final support
connections made. Fabricating on the ground allows for enhanced safety for the
bulk of the work as well as greater control of quality and ease of access for
inspectors. The drawbacks of the approach include the cost associated with
mobilizing a crane or cranes that can lift the assembly. Tight quality control is
essential to ensure that the final fit is made.
4-5.5.1.1 Some issues for the designer to be aware of include: The rigging
and lift may impose loads on a structural assembly that were not anticipated by
the designer. Even if the assembly is not damaged by the lift, it may undergo
unexpected deformations that may then be locked into the final structure once
ED
the last connections are made. The heavy lift may place the large, overhead
elements into place prior to the remainder of the facility’s framing being
completed. This is often a physical requirement given the necessity of getting
equipment adjacent to the lift operations. The designer should give some
consideration early in the design as to the lateral stability of the building
components that support the major roof elements.
L
4-5.6 Aerial Assembly with Shoring Towers. This approach is
becoming increasingly uncommon with the general availability of large cranes
and the increased emphasis on avoiding fall injuries on the work site. The
EL
approach involves the fabrication of temporary towers to support the piece-by-
piece fabrication of the major components in their final place. The temporary
shoring towers location will determine the actual deflected shape of the structure
resulting from the dead load of the structural steel only.
• The manner in which the temporary towers are removed may also
introduce unexpected, albeit temporary, loads in the main structure.
46
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
The designer is cautioned that the figure is a simplification of the
existing background information. The information presented is based upon the
assumption that a standard Type I Maintenance Hangar is being produced. It
has been further assumed that the hangar bay space is approximately 30 m
(85 feet) deep and that the design conditions are as found in Norfolk, VA. Figure
4-1 presents estimated cost based on the pounds per square foot of structural
steel required to construct a facility of approximately 7200 m2 (77000 ft2) total
area. The figures represent an average cost, including both the hangar (OH)
area and the office and shop (O1/O2) areas. It is assumed that the ratio between
OH and O1/O2 areas remains relatively constant in all Type I facilities.
ED
The graphical representation provided by Figure 4.1 shows an
economical comparison of alternative structural framing systems for planning
purposes. The project planning/design team should carefully evaluate the roof
structural framing systems and optimize the design selected considering the
long-term interest of the airfield mission.
NOTE: When generating cost estimates of low bay-type I / high bay-type II single
L
module versus multiple module and the differences associated with the primary
roof framing system, please contact the NAVFAC Engineering Innovation and
Criteria Office for additional guidance when preparing MCON 1391
EL
documentation.
$14,000,000
AN
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000 Header-Truss
$6,000,000 Systems
$4,000,000 Cantilever Systems
$2,000,000
C
$0 Cantilever Average
0 50 100 150
Single Clear Spans, Meters
47
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
avoid specifying welding for roof decks unless necessary. Mechanical fasteners
are the desired option. Additionally, there may be significant economy in erection
by allowing pneumatic and powder actuated fastening systems. If welding is
required, the designer should specify additional quality control procedures to
ensure that welds are done properly and do not deteriorate over time.
ED
the desired resisting forces. Designers should therefore avoid relying on a steel
deck as a diaphragm in the hangar bay and provide a dedicated secondary
horizontal lateral load system unless careful analysis is conducted on the deck’s
stiffness and load response. The deck may, however, be assumed to provide
local support to elements, such as top chord/flange support to joists/beams.
L
suspended loads directly from the underside of the steel deck. (See UFC 1-200-
01 for more information on loads.) The contract drawings should clearly indicate
when this is allowed and the means by which the connection is to be
EL
accomplished.
4-5.9 Wall Systems. Walls and partitions of the hangar bay should be
non-load bearing. The walls of the O1/O2 portion of the facility may be designed
as load bearing if structurally isolated from the hangar structure. This is
particularly useful as load bearing wall structures are typically more rigid than the
C
steel frame of the hangar bay. The O1/O2 structure may or may not be built as
an integral part of the hangar structure. In either case, the weight of the O1 and
O2 structure may be used to help provide stability in those cases where
AN
48
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
UFC 1-200-01.
ED
is warranted. It is not atypical for the main structural frame to be built on deep
foundations while the ground floor slabs are soil supported. In this circumstance,
differential settlement is a potential risk to the serviceability of the facility. The
designer may consider careful detailing between the floor slabs and the
surrounding structure or, in the most severe circumstances, pile supporting the
floor slab.
L
4-5.10.1 Hangar Floor. Design the primary loading area of the hangar floor
in accordance with American Concrete Institute ACI 360R Design of Slabs on
EL
Grade. For the shop and equipment area, use a typical load value of 12 kPa
(250 psf) as a planning value and verify with detailed customer interviews.
49
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
fabricated from steel bar gratings, diamond tread steel deck or more esoteric
materials. Design these surfaces according to the applicable codes for the loads
and criteria determined by the design professional.
4-5.11 Doors. Doors should meet the criteria defined in paragraph 3-11.
Design hangar doors in accordance with components and cladding, wind
pressure coefficients determined in accordance with UFC 1-200-01. Consider
the full operating range of the roof structure and wind uplift to design door guide
system.
ED
typically support their own gravity load and only impart lateral (wind, seismic)
loads to the main structural system through a track system at the door head.
Furthermore, an extensive structure is required at grade to support the bottom
door tracks as well as some means to ensure that the bottom tracks remain clear
of obstructions. See also paragraph 3-11.1.
4-5.11.2 Vertical Lift Fabric Hangar Doors. Vertical lift fabric doors are
L
lighter than rolling doors, but the entire weight is carried by the superstructure.
Additionally, beyond a practical limit of about 15 m (49 ft) multiple door leaves
are required. A complicated swinging mullion with additional overhead
EL
equipment is required for every vertical lift fabric door beyond the first. However,
vertical lifting fabric doors do not require door pockets to entirely clear the hangar
opening nor do they require extensive support at grade. See also paragraph 3-
11.2.
C
AN
C
50
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
CHAPTER 5
FIRE PROTECTION
ED
temperature, quick response sprinklers, and a low-level AFFF system designed
in accordance with UFC 3-610-01. The overhead system must be closed head,
water only sprinklers. A pre-action system can be used where the sprinkler pipes
are subject to freezing. The system must activate automatically. The low-level
system must consist of a system of nozzles located in the floor trench drains.
Activation of the low-level system must be manual and automatic. Actuation of a
L
manual releasing station or optical detector must release the low-level AFFF
system.
EL
5-3 FLOOR DRAINAGE. Provide apron and hangar floor drainage in
accordance with NFPA 409. Floor drains in aircraft storage and service areas
must be trench-type drains designed with sufficient capacity to prevent buildup of
flammable/combustible liquids and water over the drain inlet when all fire
protection systems and hose streams are discharging at the design rate.
Maximum trench spacing is 15 m (50 ft) on center. The structural engineer must
C
coordinate with the fire protection engineer; confirm the size of the piping that will
be used and design the trench to accommodate. In addition, the trench drains
should have sufficient room to accommodate mounting the floor-level AFFF
AN
solution system piping and nozzles where provided. Floor drains should be in
accordance with appropriate facility plates (Figures 3-1 through 3-17); typical
trench configurations are shown in Figures 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4 and 5-5.
51
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
5-7 EMERGENCY SHUT-OFF STATIONS. See UFC 3-610-01.
5-8 FIRE PUMPS. Fire Pumps, when required, are a part of the project
scope. Evaluate the fire protection requirements to be able to utilize a single set
of pumps in lieu of providing pumps for multiple hangars. The design agency
should provide for adequate space to accommodate the pumps and facilitate
their maintenance. Consideration should be given to accommodate the pumps in
a separate building.
ED
listed materials and methods to provide a fire resistive rating of not less than 2
hours.
5-10 WATER SUPPLY AND FOAM STORAGE. The water supply must
be capable of maintaining water discharge for the combined low-level sprinkler
systems at the design rate for a minimum of 45 minutes. The foam storage and
water quantities are based on the size of the hangar. The larger the hangar, the
L
larger the quantity of AFFF and water required. Refer to UFC 3-610-01 for
redundant foam storage, pumps, and other fire protection requirements.
EL
5-11 LIFE SAFETY. The fire protection engineer must review final floor
plans for compliance with NFPA 101. For conflict resolution contact the Chief
Fire Protection Engineer at Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1322
Patterson Ave, SE, Suite 1000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5065.
C
AN
C
52
Trenches Spaced at Maximum of 50 ft Intervals
Nozzles Spaced at Maximum of 25 ft Intervals
C
AN
C
53
EL
L
Figure 5-1 Maintenance Hangar “Pull-In”
Hangar Doors
ED
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 5-2 Maintenance Hangar “Drive Through”
Hangar Doors
ED
Trenches Spaced at Maximum of 50 ft Intervals
Nozzles Spaced at Maximum of 25 ft Intervals
L
EL
C
AN
C
Hangar Doors
54
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 5-3 Typical Low-Level AFFF System Piping
L ED
EL
Figure 5-4 Trench Drain Detail
356 mm (14”)
C
minimum
51 mm (2”)
AN
Rebar is required
to reinforce
concrete walls
C
305 mm (12”)
minimum
55
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 5-5 Trench Plate Arrangement
ED
150 mm (6”) nominal
AFFF Supply Pipe
L
Metal blanks with holes for nozzles, will be screwed and
EL
bolted into the floor around the AFFF nozzles. Standard
sized removable trench plates will then be used to cover
the rest of the trench area.
C
AN
C
56
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
CHAPTER 6
MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS
6-1.1 Infiltration Rate. Design for an infiltration rate of two air changes per
hour in the OH area. This rate is dependent upon the installation of nylon brush
insulation seals on the hangar sliding doors.
ED
should override the space thermostat to stop the heating equipment in the OH area.
Provide a minimum temperature thermostat field set at 1°C (34°F) to override the
heating deactivation switch during door-open periods of subfreezing ambient
temperatures. After the doors are closed, the room thermostat should assume control.
Heating system recovery time should be 60 minutes after the doors are closed.
L
6-1.3 Snow-Melting System. A snow-melting system at the hangar door
tracks, when sliding hangar doors are used, should be installed when outside design
temperature is -4°C (+25°F) or lower and historical snow accumulation data supports
EL
the requirement.
6-1.4 Under Floor Heating System. Investigate the use of an under floor
heating system for the OH area when outside design temperature is below –23°C
(-10°F).
C
6-1.5 Automatic Thermostatic Control. The automatic thermostatic control
must meet the requirements of MIL-HDBK-1003/3.
AN
6-1.7 Design Conditions. See the facility plates for design conditions.
analysis.
57
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
6-3 VENTILATION. Provide ventilation in accordance with MIL-HDBK-1003/3,
UFC 3-410-06N, Design: Industrial Ventilation and as follows:
6-3.1 Toxic Fumes. Toxic fumes and combustible vapor that generate in work
areas must be exhausted directly to the outside. The Airframes, Corrosion Control and
Electric Shops are likely producers of toxic fumes. These shops must always be
provided with exhaust ventilation to the outside.
ED
6-4 AIR CONDITIONING. Provide air conditioning in accordance MIL-HDBK-
1003/3 and MIL-HDBK-1190. Provide automatic thermostatic control and provide for
equipment to be shut down when not required for cooling. Air conditioning is not
required in the general OH space.
L
mechanical equipment out of sight or provide screen walls (see UFC 4-010-01 for
standoff distances). Design the size of mechanical rooms and exterior enclosures to
accommodate manufacturer’s recommendation for service, airflow and maintenance.
EL
Provide variable frequency drives where applicable. Connect direct digital controls to
base wide monitor system.
6-5.1 Corrosion Protection. Provide special finish coatings on the interior and
the exterior surfaces of HVAC equipment exposed to the weather, including all coil
surfaces and interior equipment surfaces belonging to the first HVAC equipment
C
(excluding louvers) in the supply ductwork system that is subjected to outside supply air.
The coating must not act as an insulating barrier to the HVAC heat exchange
capability.
AN
The DDC system must include an emergency shut-off switch that will
immediately shut down the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system of
inhabited structures, in accordance with Standard 19, “Emergency Air Distribution
58
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Shutoff” of UFC 4-010-01.
• Provide toilet and shower facilities for both sexes on both the O1 and O2
levels.
• Provide trench drains with sufficient laterals for aeration and easy cleanout
of oil or other residue,
ED
• Provide emergency shower/eyewash fixtures and floor drains.
• Provide storm drains located a minimum of 305 mm (12 in) from the
L
hangar access door rails, and
6-8 COMPRESSED AIR. Provide compressed air for all O1 level shop spaces
AN
at 0.018 m3/s (40 cfm) and 620.5 to 862 kPa (90 to 125 psi) at each outlet and for
hangar (OH) space as required by UFC 4-121-10N, Design: Aircraft Fixed Point Utility
Systems for hangar service points.
59
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
CHAPTER 7
ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS
ED
7-2.1 Electrical Equipment. Electrical equipment should be waterproof,
NEMA Type 4 (minimum rating) when deluge sprinkler protection is provided to
prevent equipment damage in the event of testing or accidental discharge of the
deluge system.
L
door tracks of sliding hangar doors, use electrical heating cable in conduit for
removal/maintenance. Locate below the slab for ease of maintenance.
EL
7-3 HAZARDOUS ZONES. Classify areas in high bay space as
hazardous or non-hazardous in accordance with NFPA 70. All electrical
installations must meet applicable requirements. To the extent possible,
electrical installations should not be located in hazardous zones.
60
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
• External aircraft power provided by the power service points must
be within the voltage and frequency tolerances specified for aircraft
type. The flexible power cable to the aircraft must be adequately
sized to meet the specified aircraft loading (amperage)
requirements. Spiral wrapped, six around one, flexible cables,
designed specifically for 400-hertz systems should be used.
ED
7-4.2 Considerations. Recent developments in aircraft power
requirements are leading to providing individual power units for each aircraft
power connection. Coordinate all requirements with using activity and aircraft
manufacturer and dedicate adequate wall space for all equipment.
L
dictated by mission. Provide emergency lighting with battery backup units.
Coordinate and provide for any emergency power requirements for hangar door
operation during power outages. See paragraphs 3-11.1 and 3-11.2 for more
EL
information on doors.
7-6 O1/O2 LEVEL SPACES. Provide power outlets for shop tools and
at shop bench locations. Provide dedicated circuits to the extent possible for
tools and equipment.
C
Provide grounded convenience outlets at 60 Hz, 120 V, 20 A,
capacity throughout the O1/O2 level administrative, personnel, and shop spaces
and as required by NFPA 70. Provide ground fault interrupt (GFI) receptacles in
AN
7-7 LIGHTING.
7-7.1 Interior Lighting. Interior lighting in the hangar (OH) space must
be an energy-efficient type, such as high-pressure sodium vapor or metal halide.
Metal halide should be used when specific tasks require good color rendition.
Provide connections for task lighting under shadow of aircraft.
61
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
fixture and lamp types to keep maintenance inventories to a minimum. Take into
consideration the reflectance of wall and floor surfaces, especially in hangar (OH)
spaces.
ED
Design to conserve energy, but provide a pleasant and comfortable
work environment.
L
Handbook. Provide a photoelectric control switch for exterior lighting when all
night lighting is required for safety or security reasons. Use photoelectric
controls in conjunction with programmable lighting contactors where individual or
EL
groups of lighting can be turned off at specific times after dark.
ohms maximum, and for static ground, must not exceed 10,000 ohms in
accordance with MIL-HDBK-274 (AS), Electrical Grounding for Aircraft Safety
and with NAVSEA OP5, Ammunition and Explosives Ashore Safety Regulations
for Handling, Storing, Production, Renovation and Shipping. Connect ground
receptacles together with No. 1/0 AWG minimum bare copper below the hangar
floor and connected to the facility grounding system. See Figure 7-1 for typical
power grounding details.
C
62
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Figure 7-1 Power Grounding Details
L ED
EL
7-10 ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS.
63
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
integral to the telephone system, to reach interior and exterior work areas and
the aircraft parking apron. Provide a separate handset-type microphone in the
hangar (OH) space that will broadcast only to the hangar (OH) spaces.
ED
• Base Radio System drops
• Weather-Vision LAN
L
• SIPRNET (Secure Internet Protocol Network)
EL
• CATV SYSTEM, additional outlets may be required for training
systems
64
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS
1. Department of Defense (DoD)
ED
Programs and Activities, 9 August
www.whs.pentagon.mil 1983
L
http://dod.wbdg.org
UFC 3-240-02, Design:
Wastewater Treatment Systems
EL
Augmenting Handbook
65
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
Corps Intranet (NMCI) (DRAFT)
ED
UFC 4-121-10N, Design: Aircraft
Fixed Point Utility Systems
L
Wall Panels
EL UFGS 08342N, Steel Sliding
Hangar Doors
66
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
43 FR 6030, Floodplain
Management Guidelines, 10 Feb
1978
ED
Washington, DC 20004-1111
202-272-0080 Americans with Disabilities Act
202-272-0081 (fax) Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)
http://www.access-board.gov
L
N09B15
Washington Navy Yard, Bldg 36
720 Kennon St, SE, Rm 203
EL
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5074
(202) 433-4934/5/6
(202) 433-2693 (fax)
MIL-HDBK-1003/3, Heating,
Ventilating, Air Conditioning, and
C
Dehumidifying Systems
MIL-HDBK-1004/6, Lightning
Protection
67
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
MIL-HDBK-1012/3,
Telecommunications Premises
Distribution Planning, Design, and
Estimating
ED
6. Naval Air Systems Command MIL-HDBK-274, Electrical
(NAVAIR) Grounding for Aircraft Safety
NAVAIRSYSCOMHQ
47123 Buse Rd
B2272 Unit IPT, Suite 075
Patuxent River, MD 20670-1547
L
301-757-1487
navairpao@navair.navy.mil
www.navair.navy.mil
EL
7. US Army Corps of Engineers TI 809-04, Seismic Design for
441 G. Street, NW Buildings, 31 December 1998.
Washington, DC 20314
Phone: 202-761-0008
C
Fax: 202-761-1683
http://www.usace.army.mil/
68
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
NON-GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS
1. National Fire Protection Association NFPA 70, National Electrical Code
(NFPA)
1 Batterymarch Park NFPA 90A, Standard for the
PO Box 9101 Installation of Air-Conditioning and
Quincy, MA 02269-9101 Ventilation Systems
(617) 770-3000
(617) 770-0700 (fax) NFPA 101, Life Safety Code
www.nfpa.org
NFPA 409, Aircraft Hangars
ED
NFPA 780, Installation of Lightning
Protection Systems
L
(610) 832-9585
(610) 832-9555 (fax)
www.astm.org
EL
3. International Code Council International Mechanical Code
5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 600
Falls Church, VA 22041
703-931-4533
C
Fax: 703-379-1546
www.bocai.org
www.iesna.org
69
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
ED
(312) 670-5403 (fax)
www.aisc.org
L
(703) 295-6222 fax
www.asce.org
EL
8. American Concrete Institute (ACI) ACI 360R, Design of Slabs on
PO Box 9094, Grade
Farmington Hills, MI 48333
(248) 848-3700
www.aci-int.org
C
Canada
V5C 3T6
(888)674-8937 toll free
www.paintinfo.com/
Association (AAMA)
1827 Walden Office Square,
Suite 550,
Schaumburg, Illinois 60173-4268
(847) 303-5664
http://www.aamanet.org/
70
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
APPENDIX B
3. How many employees, both direct and indirect, are expected to occupy
the hangar per shift?
ED
4. Will a security fence be required around the hangar?
L
8. Will there be parking spaces for executive parking, visitor parking, and
handicapped parking close to entrance of hangar? Of so, how many and what
EL
locations?
12. Will overhead cranes be required? If so, what locations and what lifting
capacities and lifting functions will be needed?
71
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
20. What will be the heaviest cfm drawn from hoses? (Quantity of outlets?)
22. Will fall protection/safety cables be required above aircraft? If so, what
type?
23. Will fuel tank ventilation hoses be required overhead? If so, how many
and at what locations?
24. What type and source of lighting will be preferred in the hangar? (Metal
Halide or High Pressure Sodium?) What lux (footcandle) levels are required?
ED
(Per current IES handbook.)
L
27. Will tail docks, wing docks, fuselage docks or nose docks be required? If
so, what utilities will be hooked up to them? Ie. 480 volt, 120 volt, compressed air
or water?
EL
28. What type of heating system is preferred in the hangar - floor slab,
overhead unit heaters, wall-mounted unit heaters, etc?
31. How much clear span opening width is required when hangar doors are
AN
fully opened?
32. Are there to be any portable offices placed in the hangar? If so, how
many and what utilities will be required including telephone, CRTs, printers and
PA microphones?
33. What type of utilities will be required around the inside perimeter of the
C
hangar? Such as 480 volt, 120 volt, 208 volt, 400-Hz, compressed air, water,
etc. Please give location and capacity required.
35. What type of power tooling will be mounted in hangar? Such as drill
presses, grinders, shearers, brakes, etc. In what location will this machinery be
mounted? What type of utilities will be required for operation?
36. Will there be overhead coiling doors? If so, give location and size. (Will
72
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
any locations require power for motor operators?)
38. a. Will there be any shops located in the facility? If so, please
indicate.
b. Type of shops?
ED
d. The location in the building?
L
h. Crane coverage and hook heights?
EL
i. Overhead air and electric reels?
39. Will there be an inspection area? If so, give square footage, location and
C
utilities required.
40. Will a cleaning shop be required? If so, give square footage, location,
utilities required. Also, please note any special or heavy drain items such as salt
bath ovens or large ovens. Provide material safety data sheets for all cleaning
products including application rates, methods, durations and frequencies.
41. Will there be a lunch/break room? If so, please indicate square footage,
location of building, number of employees per shift, if vending machines will be
used, what type of floor, and if drop ceilings will be required.
73
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
42. Will there be a stock room? If so, give square footage requirements,
location in building and utilities required.
43. Will there be a tool room? If so, give square footage required, location in
building and utilities required.
44. Will waste oil drains be required? If so, give locations in hangar for
receptacle funnels.
45. Will there be a drum room? If so, how many drums should it hold? What
types of chemicals are to be stored?
ED
46. Where are hazardous waste containers to be located?
47. What type of door security devices will be used? How many and what
locations?
48. How many entrances to the hangar are required for employees?
L
49. Any fluid discharges that may harm metal piping that would require an
acid waste system? (X-ray room, etc.)
EL
50. Will there be any operational requirements for emergency eye
wash/shower units? (Locations?)
51. What locations are required for hose reels for water or air? (Overhead,
column mounted or shop areas?)
C
52. Any areas other than the hangar bay that will not be air-conditioned?
AN
C
74
UFC 4-211-01N
25 October 2004
APPENDIX C
L ED
EL
C
AN
C
75