There are five main types of writs in India:
1. Habeas Corpus - Orders the production of a detained person to determine if the detention is legal and can release them if illegal.
2. Mandamus - Commands a lower public authority to perform their public or statutory duties.
3. Certiorari - Quashes orders from lower courts, tribunals, or authorities that acted without jurisdiction or in excess of authority.
4. Prohibition - Stops or forbids lower courts or bodies from exceeding their limits or powers by continuing certain proceedings.
5. Quo Warranto - Requires a person holding public office to demonstrate their authority to hold that office and can remove those improperly holding office
There are five main types of writs in India:
1. Habeas Corpus - Orders the production of a detained person to determine if the detention is legal and can release them if illegal.
2. Mandamus - Commands a lower public authority to perform their public or statutory duties.
3. Certiorari - Quashes orders from lower courts, tribunals, or authorities that acted without jurisdiction or in excess of authority.
4. Prohibition - Stops or forbids lower courts or bodies from exceeding their limits or powers by continuing certain proceedings.
5. Quo Warranto - Requires a person holding public office to demonstrate their authority to hold that office and can remove those improperly holding office
There are five main types of writs in India:
1. Habeas Corpus - Orders the production of a detained person to determine if the detention is legal and can release them if illegal.
2. Mandamus - Commands a lower public authority to perform their public or statutory duties.
3. Certiorari - Quashes orders from lower courts, tribunals, or authorities that acted without jurisdiction or in excess of authority.
4. Prohibition - Stops or forbids lower courts or bodies from exceeding their limits or powers by continuing certain proceedings.
5. Quo Warranto - Requires a person holding public office to demonstrate their authority to hold that office and can remove those improperly holding office
There are five main types of writs in India:
1. Habeas Corpus - Orders the production of a detained person to determine if the detention is legal and can release them if illegal.
2. Mandamus - Commands a lower public authority to perform their public or statutory duties.
3. Certiorari - Quashes orders from lower courts, tribunals, or authorities that acted without jurisdiction or in excess of authority.
4. Prohibition - Stops or forbids lower courts or bodies from exceeding their limits or powers by continuing certain proceedings.
5. Quo Warranto - Requires a person holding public office to demonstrate their authority to hold that office and can remove those improperly holding office
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Types of Writs
There are five types of Writs - Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition,
Certiorari and Quo warranto. 1. Habeas Corpus "Habeas Corpus" is a Latin term which literally means "you may have the body." The writ is issued to produce a person who has been detained, whether in prison or in private custody, before a court and to release him if such detention is found illegal. 2. Mandamus Mandamus is a Latin word, which means "We Command". Mandamus is an order from the Supreme Court or High Court to a lower court or tribunal or public authority to perform a public or statutory duty. This writ of command is issued by the Supreme Court or High court when any government, court, corporation or any public authority has to do a public duty but fails to do so. 3. Certiorari Literally, Certiorari means to be certified. The writ of certiorari can be issued by the Supreme Court or any High Court for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. There are several conditions necessary for the issue of writ of certiorari. There should be court, tribunal or an officer having legal authority to determine the question with a duty to act judicially. Such a court, tribunal or officer must have passed an order acting without jurisdiction or in excess of the judicial authority vested by law in such court, tribunal or officer. The order could also be against the principles of natural justice or the order could contain an error of judgment in appreciating the facts of the case. 4. Prohibition The Writ of prohibition means to forbid or to stop and it is popularly known as 'Stay Order'. This writ is issued when a lower court or a body tries to transgress the limits or powers vested in it. The writ of prohibition is issued by any High Court or the Supreme Court to any inferior court, or quasi judicial body prohibiting the latter from continuing the proceedings in a particular case, where it has no jurisdiction to try. After the issue of this writ, proceedings in the lower court etc. come to a stop. Difference between Prohibition and Certiorari: While the writ of prohibition is available during the pendency of proceedings, the writ of certiorari can be resorted to only after the order or decision has been announced. Both the writs are issued against legal bodies. 5. The Writ of Quo-Warranto The word Quo-Warranto literally means "by what warrants?" or "what is your authority"? It is a writ issued with a view to restrain a person from holding a public office to which he is not entitled. The writ requires the concerned person to explain to the Court by what authority he holds the office. If a person has usurped a public office, the Court may direct him not to carry out any activities in the office or may announce the office to be vacant. Thus High Court may issue a writ of quo-warranto if a person holds an office beyond his retirement age. Conditions for issue of Quo-Warranto The office must be public and it must be created by a statue or by the constitution itself. The office must be a substantive one and not merely the function or employment of a servant at the will and during the pleasure of another. There must have been a contravention of the constitution or a statute or statutory instrument, in appointing such person to that office. Appeals in Writs: The provision of Article 226 is a constitutional provision, but it is not a fundamental right. There is no guarantee attached to it unlike Article 32. The scope of Article 226 is wider than that of Article 32 because the operation of Article 226 is not limited to violation of fundamental rights only, but it can be operated for other purposes also. However, in entertaining the writs, the High Court enjoys wide and open powers as a matter of discretion. It is a plenary power of the High Court without any fatter from any provision of the Constitution. Since it is an extraordinary jurisdiction with the High Court, it has no! to be resorted to in routine. The basic objective of this power is to ensure justice wherever the miscarriage of justice is manifest. The High Court has to reach the remotest comer of justice to eliminate injustice. The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. If a writ fails to be entertained by the Hon’ble High Court, then the Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 132(1), 133(1) or 134 of the Constitution in respect of any judgement, decree or final order of a High Court in both civil and criminal cases, involving substantial questions of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution. Appeals also lie to the Supreme Court in civil matters if the High Court concerned certifies : (a) that the case involves a substantial question of law of general importance, and (b) that, in the opinion of the High Court, the said question needs to be decided by the Supreme Court. In criminal cases, an appeal lies to the Supreme Court if the High Court (a) has on appeal reversed an order of acquittal of an accused person and sentenced him to death or to imprisonment for life or for a period of not less than 10 years, or (b) has withdrawn for trial before itself any case from any Court subordinate to its authority and has in such trial convicted the accused and sentenced him to death or to imprisonment for life or for a period of not less than 10 years, or (c) certified that the case is a fit one for appeal to the Supreme Court. Parliament is authorised to confer on the Supreme Court any further powers to entertain and hear appeals from any judgement, final order or sentence in a criminal proceeding of a High Court.