Reading Passage 1: IELTS Mock Test 2020 September
Reading Passage 1: IELTS Mock Test 2020 September
Reading Passage 1: IELTS Mock Test 2020 September
September
Reading Practice Test 1
HOW TO USE
You have 2 ways to access the test
READING PASSAGE 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on
Reading Passage 1 below.
If money isn’t the key to happiness, then what is? In all 44 countries surveyed
by a prominent research centre, family life provided the greatest source of
satisfaction. Married people live on average three years longer and enjoy
greater physical and psychological health than the unmarried and, surprisingly,
couples in a cohabitational relationship. Having a family enhances well-being,
and spending more time with one’s family helps even more. Social interaction
among families, neighbourhoods, workplaces, communities and religious
groups correlates strongly with subjective well-being. In fact, the degree of
individuals’ social connections is the best benchmark of their happiness.
Control of one’s life in general is also key. Happiness is clearly correlated with
the presence of favourable events such as promotion or marriage, and the
absence of troubles or bad luck such as accidents, being laid off or conflicts.
These events on their own signal the success or failure to reach one’s goals,
and therefore the control one has. On a national level, the more that
governments recognise individual preferences, the happier their citizens will
be. Choice, and citizens’ belief that they can affect the political process,
increase subjective well-being. Furthermore, evidence exists for an association
between unhappiness and poor health: people from underdeveloped countries
are among the unhappiest in the world, and their life expectancy has been
falling steadily. People are more satisfied in societies which minimally restrict
their freedom of action, in other words, where they are in control rather than
being controlled. Happy people are characterised by the belief that they are
able to control their situation, whereas unhappy people tend to believe that
they are a victim of fate. Happy people are also more psychologically resilient,
assertive and open to experience.
But how good is the evidence for this alternative viewpoint then - that
happiness, and not financial status, contributes to good health, and long life? A
study of nuns, spanning seven decades, supports this theory. Autobiographies
written by the nuns in their early 1920s were scored for positive and negative
emotions. Nuns expressing the most positive emotions lived on average ten
years longer than those expressing the least positive emotions. Happy people,
it seems, are much less likely to fall ill and die than unhappy people.
But what must we do to be happy? Experts cite the old maxim “be happy with
what you’ve got.” Look around you, they say, and identify the positive factors
in your life. Concentrating on the negative aspects of one’s life is a no-no, and
so is worrying. Worrying is a negative thinking habit that is nearly always about
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 3
something that lies in the future. It stems, apparently, from our cave dwelling
days, when we had to think on a day-to-day basis about how and where to find
food and warmth, for example. But in the modern world, worrying simply
undermines our ability to enjoy life in the present. More often than not, the
things we worry about never come to pass anyway. Just as important is not to
dwell on the past - past mistakes, bad experiences, missed opportunities and
so on.
What else can we do? Well, engage in a loving relationship with another adult,
and work hard to sustain it. Try to plan frequent interactions with your family,
friends and neighbours (in that order). Make sure you’re not working so hard
that you’ve no time left for personal relationships and leisure. If you are, leave
your job voluntarily to become self-employed, but don’t get sacked — that’s
more damaging to well-being than the loss of a spouse, and its effects last
longer. In your spare time, join a club, volunteer for community service, or take
up religion.
If none of the above works, then vote for a political party with the same agenda
as the King of Bhutan, who announced that his nation’s objective is national
happiness.
Which THREE of the following statements are true, according to the text?
A episode
B interaction
C cooperation
D control
E number
F level
G course
H conflict
I limit
Money can buy you just about anything, but not. it seems, happiness. Whether on
a personal or national 4 , your bank balance won't make you
happier. Once the basic criteria of a roof over your head and food on the table
have been met, money ceases to play a part. One of the most important factors in
achieving happiness is the extent of our social 5 - our
relationships with family, friends, colleagues anti so on. Equally important is the
amount of 6 we have, either in our personal life, working life, or
even in our ability to influence the political 7 that our country
embarks on.
11
One’s attitude to life has no influence on one’s health.
12
Instinct can be a barrier to happiness.
13
Family and friends rank equally as sources of
happiness.
Language lovers, just like music lovers, enjoy variety. For the latter there's
Mozart, The Rolling Stones and Beyonce. For the former there's English,
French, Swahili, Urdu... the list is endless. But what about those poor
overworked students who find learning difficult, confusing languages a drudge?
Wouldn't it put a smile on their faces if there were just one simple, easy-to-
learn tongue that would cut their study time by years? Well, of course, it exists.
It's called Esperanto, and it's been around for more than 120 years. Esperanto
is the most widely spoken artificially constructed international language. The
name derives from Doktoro Esperanto, the pseudonym under which L. L.
Zamenhof first published his Unua Libro in 1887. The phrase itself means 'one
who hopes'. Zamenhof's goal was to create an easy and flexible language as a
universal second language to promote peace and international understanding.
Zamenhof, after ten years of developing his brainchild from the late 1870s to
the early 1880s, had the first Esperanto grammar published in Warsaw in July
1887. The number of speakers grew rapidly over the next few decades, at first
primarily in the Russian empire and Eastern Europe, then in Western Europe
and the Americas, China, and Japan. In the early years, speakers of Esperanto
kept in contact primarily through correspondence and periodicals, but since
1905 world congresses have been held on five continents every year except
during the two World Wars. Latest estimates for the numbers of Esperanto
speakers are around 2 million. Put in percentage terms, that's about 0.03% of
the world's population - no staggering figure, comparatively speaking. One
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 7
reason is that Esperanto has no official status in any country, but it is an
optional subject on the curriculum of several state education systems. It is
widely estimated that it can be learned in anywhere between a quarter to a
twentieth of the time required for other languages.
Needless to say, the language has Its critics. Some point to the Eastern
European features of the language as being harsh and difficult to pronounce,
and argue that Esperanto has an artificial feel to it, without the flow of a
natural tongue, and that by nature of its artificiality, it is impossible to become
emotionally involved with the language. Others cite its lack of cultural history,
indigenous literature - "no one has ever written a novel straight into Esperanto"
- together with its minimal vocabulary and its inability to express all the
necessary philosophical, emotional and psychological concepts.
Esperantists further claim that Esperanto has the potential - were it universally
taught for a year or two throughout the world - to empower ordinary people to
communicate effectively worldwide on a scale that far exceeds that which is
attainable today by only the most linguistically brilliant among us. It offers the
opportunity to improve communication in business, diplomacy, scholarship and
other fields so that those who speak many different native languages will be
able to participate fluently in international conferences and chat comfortably
with each other after the formal presentations are made. Nowadays that
privilege is often restricted to native speakers of English and those who have
special talents and opportunities for learning English as a foreign language.
What Esperanto does offer in concrete terms is the potential of saving billions
of dollars which are now being spent on translators and interpreters, billions
which would be freed up to serve the purposes of governments and
organisations that spend so much of their resources to change words from one
language into the words of others. Take, for example, the enormously costly
conferences, meetings and documentation involved in the European Union
parliamentary and administrative procedures - all funded, essentially, by tax
payers. And instead of the World Health Organisation, and all NGOs for that
matter, devoting enormous sums to provide interpreters and translations, they
would be able to devote those huge amounts of money to improving the health
of stricken populations throughout the world.
Choose the correct heading for paragraphs B - G from the list of headings
below.
vi A real language
ix Lost in translation
Example
Paragraph A vii
14
Paragraph B
15
Paragraph C
16
Paragraph D
17
Paragraph E
18
Paragraph F
19
Paragraph G
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
23
Supporters of Esperanto say it gives everyone an
equal voice.
24
Esperanto is the only artificially-constructed language.
25
Esperanto can be learned as part of a self-study
course.
26
Esperanto can be used equally in formal and casual
situations.
Melting land ice in the Arctic is set to cause a global rise in sea levels, leading
to disastrous effects for both man and wildlife. Many species worldwide are
threatened with extinction, and low-lying islands and land masses will
disappear entirely. But the havoc wreaked by the effect of greenhouse gases
won’t be confined to just too much water, but the absence of it, as well. In
other words, desertification. A decrease in the total amount of rainfall in arid
and semi-arid areas could increase the total area of drylands worldwide, and
thus the total amount of land potentially at risk from desertification.
But desertification will not be limited to the drylands of Africa and Asia.
According to the environmental organisation Greenpeace, the Mediterranean
will suffer substantially, too. If current trends in emissions of greenhouse gases
continue, global temperatures are expected to rise faster over the next century
than over any time during the last 10,000 years. Significant uncertainties
surround predictions of regional climate changes, but it is likely that the
Mediterranean region will also warm significantly, increasing the frequency and
severity of droughts across the region. As the world warms, global sea levels
will rise as oceans expand and glaciers melt. Around much of the
Mediterranean basin, sea levels could rise by close to 1m by 2100. As a result,
some low-lying coastal areas would be lost through flooding or erosion, while
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 13
rivers and coastal aquifers would become more salty. The worst affected areas
will be the Nile Delta, Venice in Italy and Thessaloniki in Greece, two major
cities where local subsidence means that sea levels could rise by at least one-
and-a-half times as much as elsewhere.
The consequences of all this, says Greenpeace, are far-reaching, and the
picture is a gloomy one. Livestock production would suffer due to a
deterioration in the quality of rangeland. Yields of grains and other crops could
decrease substantially across the Mediterranean region due to increased
frequency of drought. Crop production would be further threatened by
increases in competition for water and the prevalence of pests and diseases
and land loss through desertification and sea-level rise. The combination of
heat and pollution would lead to an upsurge in respiratory illness among urban
populations, while extreme weather events could increase death and injury
rates. Water shortages and damaged infrastructure would increase the risk of
cholera and dysentery, while higher temperatures would increase the incidence
of infectious diseases, such as malaria and dengue fever. Serious social
disruption could occur as millions are forced from their homelands as a result of
desertification, poor harvests and sea-level rise, while international disputes
over shared water resources could turn into conflict.
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Human intervention is a potential solution to potential
disaster.
34
The rate of climate change is set to accelerate
dramatically.
35
There is seldom enough information available in some
areas to track how fast the effects of climate change have happened in
the past.
36
Desertification is attributable to a number of factors.
Climate change may have catastrophic effects on the human and animal world. As
glaciers melt, sea levels will rise, causing extensive flooding and land
37 38
. Another consequence of global warming is
39
, which affects areas known as . These areas are subject to
irregular weather patterns, but also suffer from human intervention or neglect,
40
such as inadequate or inefficient systems.
A irrigation
B cooling
C drylands
D cause
E loss
F abuse
G desertification
H deserts
I emission
1-3 C,E,G 4 F
5 B 6 D
7 G 8 NOT GIVEN
11 FALSE 12 TRUE
13 FALSE 14 v
15 viii 16 iii
17 vi 18 i
19 ii 20 C
21 D 22 B
23 YES 24 NO
29 initiate 30 aridity
31 vegetation 32 soils
33 G 34 E
35 D 36 B
37 E 38 G
39 C 40 A