Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 42 views

    Centarl Tendency-Skewness-Detecting Outliers-Students

    Uploaded by

    TUSHAR JAIN
    The document contains data on voting methods used in elections in 1980, 2000, and 2002. It shows the percentage of jurisdictions using different methods such as punch cards, lever machines, paper ballots, optical scan, electronic, and mixed methods. Over time, there was a shift away from punch cards, lever machines, and paper ballots toward optical scan and electronic methods of voting.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Centarl Tendency-Skewness-Detecting Outliers-Students

    Uploaded by

    TUSHAR JAIN
    42 views9 pages
    The document contains data on voting methods used in elections in 1980, 2000, and 2002. It shows the percentage of jurisdictions using different methods such as punch cards, lever machines, paper ballots, optical scan, electronic, and mixed methods. Over time, there was a shift away from punch cards, lever machines, and paper ballots toward optical scan and electronic methods of voting.

    Original Title

    centarl tendency-skewness-detecting outliers-students

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains data on voting methods used in elections in 1980, 2000, and 2002. It shows the percentage of jurisdictions using different methods such as punch cards, lever machines, paper ballots, optical scan, electronic, and mixed methods. Over time, there was a shift away from punch cards, lever machines, and paper ballots toward optical scan and electronic methods of voting.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    42 views9 pages

    Centarl Tendency-Skewness-Detecting Outliers-Students

    Uploaded by

    TUSHAR JAIN
    The document contains data on voting methods used in elections in 1980, 2000, and 2002. It shows the percentage of jurisdictions using different methods such as punch cards, lever machines, paper ballots, optical scan, electronic, and mixed methods. Over time, there was a shift away from punch cards, lever machines, and paper ballots toward optical scan and electronic methods of voting.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 9

    4.

    21
    5.55
    3.02
    5.13
    4.77
    2.34 As a customer walks into the branch office during the lunch hour,
    3.54 she asks the branch manager how long she can expect to wait. The
    branch manager replies, “Almost certainly less than five minutes”.
    3.2 On the basis of the results of (a) and (b), evaluate the accuracy of
    4.5 this statement.
    Ans:
    6.1
    0.38
    5.12
    6.46
    6.19
    3.79
    Mean
    Median
    Variance
    Sd
    CV
    Suppose that the branch manager would like to guarantee a
    certain level of service during the peak lunch period. Failure to
    obtain service within a specified time would result in a small
    monetary payment or gift to the customer. What waiting time do
    you think should be used as a cutoff above which this gift would
    be provided? Explain your answer.

    Ans:
    e lunch hour,
    ct to wait. The
    five minutes”.
    e accuracy of

    arantee a
    d. Failure to
    n a small
    aiting time do
    his gift would
    525 530 530 535 535 535 535 535 540
    540 540 540 545 545 545 545 545 550
    550 550 550 550 550 560 560 560 565
    565 570 570 572 575 575 575 580 580
    580 585 590 590 590 600 600 600 600
    610 615 625 625 625 635 649 650 670
    675 675 680 690 700 700 700 700 715
    540 Seventy efficiency apartments were randomly sampled in a
    college town. The monthly rent prices for the apartments are
    550 listed below in ascending order.
    565 make a frequency distribution to comment upon the skewness
    580 of data
    610
    670
    715
    d)As a customer walks into the branch office during
    9.66 the Friday evening hours, he asks the branch
    5.9 manager how long she can expect to wait. The
    branch manager replies, “Almost certainly less than
    8.02 five minutes”. On the basis of the results of (a) and
    5.79 (b), evaluate the accuracy of this statement.
    8.73
    Ans: branch Manager's statement “Almost certainly
    3.82 less than five minutes”, is invalid as mean is 7.11
    8.01 minutes.
    8.35
    10.49
    6.68
    5.64
    4.08
    6.17 e)Suppose that the branch manager would like to guarantee a certai
    service during the Friday evening hours. Failure to obtain service wit
    9.91 time would result in a small monetary payment or gift to the custom
    5.47 waiting time do you think should be used as a cutoff above which th
    be provided? Explain your answer.
    mean 7.114667 ans)One SD limit (67% of the customers): upper limit is 9.19 minutes
    median 6.68 approx.may be considered as the cutoff time , beyond which a smal
    Max 10.49 Min 3.82 payment or gift may be given to the customes.
    range 6.67 max-min
    variance 4.335512
    SD 2.082189
    CV 29.26615 SD/mean*100
    office during
    ranch
    ait. The
    nly less than
    ts of (a) and
    ment.

    ost certainly
    an is 7.11

    would like to guarantee a certain level of


    rs. Failure to obtain service within a specified
    payment or gift to the customer. What
    sed as a cutoff above which this gift would

    rs): upper limit is 9.19 minutes. So 9 minutes


    off time , beyond which a small monetary
    ustomes.
    Method 1980 2000 2002
    Punch
    18.5 18.5 15.5
    cards

    Lever
    36.7 14.4 10.6
    machines

    Paper
    40.7 11.9 10.5
    ballots
    Optical
    0.8 41.5 43
    scan
    Electroni
    0.2 9.3 16.3
    c
    Mixed 3.1 4.4 4.1

    Method 1980 2000 2002


    Punch
    31.7 31.4 22.6
    cards

    Lever
    42.9 17.4 15.5
    machines

    Paper
    10.5 1.5 1.3
    ballots
    Optical
    2.1 30.8 31.8
    scan
    Electroni
    0.7 12.2 19.6
    c
    Mixed 12 6.7 9.3
    2002

    Punch cards Lever machines Paper ballots


    Optical scan Electronic Mixed
    1980 2000 2002 1980 2000 2002
    Punch cards 18.5 18.5 15.5 Punch cards 31.7 31.4 22.6
    Lever machines 36.7 14.4 10.6 Lever machines 42.9 17.4 15.5
    Paper ballots 40.7 11.9 10.5 Paper ballots 10.5 1.5 1.3
    Optical scan 0.8 41.5 43 Optical scan 2.1 30.8 31.8
    Electronic 0.2 9.3 16.3 Electronic 0.7 12.2 19.6
    Mixed 3.1 4.4 4.1 Mixed 12 6.7 9.3

    You might also like