PTSD and Cognitive Processing Therapy Presented by Patricia A. Resick, PHD, Abpp
PTSD and Cognitive Processing Therapy Presented by Patricia A. Resick, PHD, Abpp
PTSD and Cognitive Processing Therapy Presented by Patricia A. Resick, PHD, Abpp
Presented by
Presence of one or more of the following
intrusion symptoms associated with the C. Persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the
traumatic event(s), beginning after the traumatic traumatic event(s), beginning after the traumatic
event(s) occurred: event(s) occurred, as evidenced by avoidance or efforts
4. Intense or prolonged psychological distress at exposure
to avoid one or more of the following:
to internal or external cues that symbolize or resemble an 1. Distressing memories, thoughts, or feelings about or
aspect of the traumatic event(s) closely associated with the traumatic event(s)
5. Marked physiological reactions to reminders of the 2. External reminders (i.e., people, places,
traumatic event(s) conversations, activities, objects, situations) that arouse
distressing memories, thoughts, or feelings about, or
that are closely associated with, the traumatic event(s)
Negative alterations in cognitions and mood Negative alterations in cognitions and mood
associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning or
worsening after the traumatic event(s) occurred), as associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning or
evidenced by two or more of the following: worsening after the traumatic event(s) occurred), as
1. Inability to remember an important aspect of the evidenced by two or more of the following:
traumatic event(s) (typically due to dissociative amnesia that
is not due to head injury, alcohol, or drugs). 4. Persistent negative emotional state (e.g., fear, horror,
2. Persistent and exaggerated negative beliefs or anger, guilt, or shame).
expectations about oneself, others, or the world (e.g., “I am 5. Markedly diminished interest or participation in
bad,” “No one can be trusted,” "The world is completely
dangerous"). (Alternatively, this might be expressed as, e.g., significant activities.
“I’ve lost my soul forever,” or “My whole nervous system is 6. Feelings of detachment or estrangement from others.
permanently ruined”).
3. Persistent, distorted blame of self or others about the 7. Persistent inability to experience positive emotions
cause or consequences of the traumatic event(s). (e.g., unable to have loving feelings, psychic
numbing).
Marked alterations in arousal and reactivity associated F. Duration of the disturbance (Criteria B, C, D, and
with the traumatic event(s), beginning or worsening E) is more than 1 month.
after the traumatic event(s) occurred, as evidenced by G. The disturbance causes clinically significant
two or more of the following:
distress or impairment in social, occupational, or
1. Irritable or aggressive behavior
other important areas of functioning.
2. Reckless or self‐destructive behavior
3. Hypervigilance
H. The disturbance is not attributed to the direct
physiological effects of a substance (e.g.,
4. Exaggerated startle response
medication, drugs, or alcohol) or another medical
5. Problems with concentration
condition (e.g. traumatic brain injury).
6. Sleep disturbance (e.g., difficulty falling or staying
asleep or restless sleep)
Subtype: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder – With
Prominent Dissociative
(Depersonalization/Derealization) Symptoms
A.The individual meets the diagnostic criteria for PTSD and
in addition experiences persistent or recurrent symptoms of
A1, A2, or both:
A1. Depersonalization: Experiences of feeling detached from, and as if A Functional Model
one is an outside observer of, one’s mental processes or body (e.g.,
feeling as though one is in a dream, sense of unreality of self or body,
or time moving slowly.
of
A2. Derealization: Experiences of unreality of one’s surroundings (e.g.,
world around the person is experienced as unreal, dreamlike, distant,
or distorted)
Posttraumatic Stress
B. The disturbance is not due to the direct physiological
effects of a substance (e.g., blackouts, or behavior during
Disorder
alcohol intoxication), or another medical condition (e.g.,
complex partial seizures).
Let’s start with the most
homogeneous severe event:
rape 2 12 2 12
= Resick et al. = Riggs et al.
30
PTSD
25 Non-PTSD
20
PTSD Severit y Score
15
Let’s rearrange and think
10
about post‐trauma
5
symptoms a bit differently
0 Weeks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Rothbaum, B.O., Foa, E.B., Riggs, D.S., Murdock, T. & Walsh, W. (1992). A prospective examination of
posttraumatic stress disorder in rape victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5, 455-475.
Emotions
Cognitions
Persistent negative
Guilt/self-blame
Erroneous other Emotions
Lack of positive emotions
E blame
Detachment from others
V Intrusions Negative beliefs
E about future, self,
E Flashbacks V
others
Cognitions and
amnesia
N E Emotions
T N
T Intrusions
irritable or aggressive
behavior
reckless or self‐destructive
behavior
problems with concentration
sleep disturbance Intrusions
E Emotions/
V Intrusions Cogntions
E Arousal
Arousal/Reactivity reactivity
N
T Cognitions
When intrusions occur, natural emotions and arousal run their
course and thoughts have a chance to be examined and
corrected. It is an active “approach” process of dealing with the
event.
• This list is not
exhaustive
• Any behavior that
serves to
Intrusions escape/avoid
reactivity
Cognitions/ /Arousal
reminders, negative
emotions trauma‐related
emotions, images or
thoughts is
functioning as
Avoidance of avoidance
Core Reactions external reminders and
And internal reminders
Intrusions
Arousal/
Cognitions reactivity Intrusions
emotions Arousal/
Cognitions, reactivit
emotions y
Core Reactions
Core Reactions Escape/Avoidance
Escape/Avoidance
Well‐modulated emergency
response
PFC
Can change in Amygdala
Amygdala
PTSD symptoms
be top‐down as
well as bottom‐ Brain stem
up?
Threat (UCS)
Resick and Rasmusson, 2010
PTSD Response
Bremner et al
1999b; Milad,
PFC et al. 2009;
Rauch et al
1998, 2000;
Shin, et al.
2001
Amygdala What is the
role of Can we find
cognition? another route to
Brain stem
change?
Trauma Triggers
(CS)
Resick and Rasmusson, 2010
A. Match B. Label
Angry Afraid
C. Shapes
Hariri, Bookheimer & John C. Mazziotta
(1999)
How Cognitive Therapy
May Work
PFC
match label
BL Amygdala
CE
Brain stem
CT forces the frontal lobe on‐line which
Trauma focused inhibits the amygdala and prevents
cognitive therapy extreme emotional responses, even while
the trauma circuit is simultaneously &
sufficiently activated.
Resick and Rasmusson, 2010
Throughout their lives, people are taking in information
through all of their senses.
These beliefs work as long as there is no contradictory
information.
We work to organize all of that information (words,
categories, schemas, etc.) in an attempt to understand,
predict and control. Traumas that lead to PTSD are schema (belief)
incongruent with prior positive beliefs and/or schema
Most people are taught the “just world belief” by parents, congruent with previous negative beliefs.
teachers, religions, culture.
Intrusive symptoms occur as a result of the inability to
We tend to believe that good behavior is rewarded and accommodate the information .
mistakes or bad behavior are punished.
Once the trauma is over, it is a memory. It is
important information that has to be
integrated.
≈
People have three possibilities:
Beliefs Trauma
• The information matches and is incorporated.
• They change their view of the world/themselves
to incorporate the new information.
• They change too much and interpret everything
in light of this new information.
I knew I
Beliefs ≈
STUCK
Trauma
It is my
fault Beliefs
≈
STUCK
Trauma
shouldn’t
have
trusted
him/her
Beliefs
≈
STUCK
Trauma Beliefs Trauma
The therapist needs
There are two types
to determine which
of emotions
Over‐ kind of emotion it is
Assimilation Natural emotions emanate
accommodation
directly from the event and are If natural, clients need to
(about the hard‐wired
(about present and feel and let it run its
past/trauma) • fight‐flight response → fear‐
future) anger
course. Natural emotions
dissipate quickly
• Losses → sadness
• Disgust → withdrawal
Manufactured emotions are
produced by thoughts and If manufactured, clients
Undoing, (“if only, should have”) Conclusions, implications of trauma beliefs need to change their
guilt or blame about trauma (“never, always, no one”, all re: 5 themes) • Self‐blame thoughts → guilt thinking.
• Other‐blame thoughts →anger
or rage
Challenging avoidance. Substance abuse/dependence
Self‐harm/suicidality/homicidality
Dissipation of natural emotions.
Dissociation
Changes in interpretation about the Literacy
event changes manufactured emotions
(no habituation required). Other comorbidity
Clients learn not to over‐generalize their Medications and other treatments
thinking about a single bad event to all
people or themselves as people (just because How early can you start?
an event has bad consequences, it doesn’t
• Risk to re‐exposure (upcoming deployment)
have to have big implications).
• Sufficient skills needed to start?
CAPS‐5 interview for
diagnosis, frequency
Motivational interviewing techniques may be
and severity (pre and
helpful (advantages and disadvantages of
post‐treatment)
avoidance)
• PTSD Checklist (PCL‐5)
Patient needs to believe that improvement is Self‐report scales • Beck Depression
possible for him/her Inventory or other
(PCL required weekly)
depression checklist
Patient needs to believe that he/she has the
ability to tolerate therapy and has sufficient skills
www.ptsd.va.gov
Desire to approach needs to be stronger than
desire to avoid.
Brief update (mood Review of practice
and PTSD symptoms) assignment Setting new practice assignment
• Objective symptom • Reviewing practice
measures reinforces completion • Review rationale
• Complete practice • Content is the “meat” of
assignment review (“Let’s the session • Explain the concept and new
go over your worksheets” • Use Socratic dialogue and assignment
rather than “How was model challenging
your week?”)
• Start assignment in session
thoughts
• Use relevant forms • Problem solve any barriers to
regardless of the content assignment completion
Also 12 sessions
Analyze,
Impact
Information ABC sheets
statement
gathering, feelings Outline of CPT‐C in Part 3 of manual
Still trauma‐focused therapy
Challenging Problematic
Challenge
questions patterns
Major Changes:
• Session 3: assign more A‐B‐C practice
Challenging
Change (CBW) Beliefs Themes • Session 4: Introduce Challenging Questions
Worksheet • Session 6: Introduction of Challenging Beliefs Worksheet
WITHOUT Safety Module
• Session 7: Introduce Safety Module
1. Describe symptoms of PTSD (handout)
2. PTSD as a disorder of non‐recovery
3. Fight‐flight‐freeze reactions
4. Cognitive theory of PTSD
• Just world belief
• Assimilation versus over‐accommodation
• Goal of accommodation
5. Types of emotions 7. Stuck points
• Natural emotions result directly from event‐ • Handout
the hardwired response (goal is to feel them • Log
and let them run their course).
• Manufactured emotions are based on 8. Anticipating avoidance and
interpretations of the event (goal is to increasing practice compliance
change the thought, which changes the
emotion).
9. Overview of treatment
6. Choosing index traumatic event
There are two logs Thoughts not
Black and white All or nothing
Patient log & therapist log feelings
The stuck point log is a living document (keep adding to
it):
Thought behind
Use it for ABC sheets (B Column) the moral If/then Not always
Use it for CQW & PPT statement or statements “I statements”
golden rule
Use it for CBW
Use it to ID SPs based on 5 themes as they are introduced
Use it for pt to continue to identify SPs they need to work Not always
on AFTER treatment termination Not behaviors Concise linked to
traumatic event
Goal: Patients examine impact of
traumatic event on their lives.
Therapist determines whether this has been
achieved uses this examination to increase
motivation for change.
Highlight connection between
thoughts and feelings.
A-B-C Sheet
Use an example from life of how most
events are open to interpretation
A-B-C Sheet
ACTIVATING EVENT BELIEF/STUCK POINT CONSEQUENCE
A B C
“Something happens” “ I tell myself something” “I feel something”
Review A‐B‐C Worksheets
I was raped by my I must have done Guilty
friend. something that made Confused
Using Socratic questions, help him think it was OK. Scared
patient generate alternative
thoughts and consequent feelings
Is it reasonable to tell yourself “B” above?
_______________________________________________________________________
Gently begin to challenge _______________________________________________________________________
undoing or self‐blame statements
What can you tell yourself on such occasions in the future?
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
At this point in therapy we do
not strongly challenge
maladaptive statements
Principles of Socratic
More important to help clarify
thoughts and feelings Dialogue
Work gently with assimilation
(self‐blame & undoing)
ASK
Therapist asks questions to assist in • Question everything!
• Don’t assume
challenging the accuracy of thought processes • You can ask anything if you ask right
and rectifying those that have kept the patient
BE on their team
from recovering
• Helps to externalize thoughts
• Decreases defensiveness
Cornerstone of CPT practice
Think (NOT act) CRITICALLY about their logic
• Get non‐judgmentally into their head
• Be curious, not confrontational or argumentative
C = Clarify C = Clarify
• Assimilation
• “What were your expectations for that mission?”
A = Assumptions • “What did you know about that road? Was there
any reason to think that your buddy was in more
danger than usual?”
R = Real evidence • Over‐accommodation
• “Your thought is that no people can be trusted?”
• “When you say that you have poor judgment what
D = Deeper beliefs do you mean?”
A = Assumptions A = Assumptions (continued)
• Assimilation (hindsight, happily ever • Over‐accommodation
after, and just world biases)
• “Have you been out on patrol and nothing
• “At that time, did you consider breaking
bad happened?”
protocol? Why not?”
• “Did the insurgent know that you were • “Have you (or someone else) had alcohol
single and your friend was married?” without being attacked?”
• “Why do you assume you could have • “What would have happened if you broke
saved him?” the rules to cover your buddy and he was
killed anyway?”
R = Real evidence R = Real evidence (continued)
• Assimilation • Over‐accommodation
• “What is the evidence that you would have • “Looking at the other people in your life, why
saved your friend?” would this person’s actions mean that other
• “Why were you sent to the other location?” people are less trustworthy?”
• Did the unit commander intend for your • In what ways can you trust the other people in
friend to be killed? Did he know there was your life?
going to be an explosion? • “When you say “I have bad judgment, are you
• “Who actually has the fault, who intended talking about in every aspect? What about as a
the harm?” parent/spouse, etc?
Content
D = Deeper Beliefs (meaning making)
• Make assumptions
• Assimilation • Go after over‐accommodation before assimilation
• “What does it mean about you that this event
happened to you?” Process
• “What does it mean about other people?” • Rhetorical questions
• Have to be a cogent line of questioning
• Over‐accommodation
• Too convincing
• “What would that mean if you didn’t have • Impatience
complete control?” • Inadvertently validate stuck point
• “What if you got close to someone and they • Create power struggle
died?” • Not maintained balance between validation and challenge
Had no options
• “If only I had done x, the
Were there event would not have
options at the Hindsight bias happened. I should have
time? Statement not true. known that x would
Was it an option Acceptance. Wishful happen”
at the time?
Had considered options. thinking • “Something bad
Go through choices and happened so someone
NO Outcome based
Yes possible outcomes (not just must be to blame.
Alt. thought‐ reasoning (just world) Everything happens for
fantasies).
“I couldn’t have
a reason”
stopped X”
Why did you not Failing to differentiate
choose it? Is it possible between guilt (intent), • “It is my fault that the
that outcome would
responsibility (played a IED exploded and my
have been worse? (put men were killed”
role), and the
in context)
unforeseeable.
Your Role in the Traumatic Event:
What are the Facts?
Below are a list of questions to be used in helping you
challenge your maladaptive or problematic beliefs/stuck
No way to points. Not all questions will be appropriate for the
Unforeseeable predict it would Grief/sadness
happen belief/stuck point you choose to challenge. Answer as
many questions as you can for the belief/stuck point
Played a role in
you have chosen to challenge below.
the event but
Responsible didn’t intend
Regret
Belief/Stuck Point:_________________________________________
outcome
1. What is the evidence for and against this idea?
2. Is your belief a habit or based on facts?
Intended harm; 3. In what ways is your Stuck Point not including all the
Fault/Blame intended the Guilty
information?
outcome
4. Are you thinking in all-or-none terms?
5. Does the Stuck Point include words or phrases that
are extreme or exaggerated? (i.e., always, forever,
never, need, should, must, can’t and every time).
6. In what ways is your Stuck Point focused on just one
piece of the story? Therapist introduces
Patient and therapist
7. Where did this study point come from: Is this a Patterns of
review Challenging
Problematic Thinking
dependable source of information on this stuck point? Questions Worksheets
Sheet to see if there are
8. How is your Stuck Point confusing something that is to question single
typical patterns of
possible with something that is likely? statements or beliefs
cognition
9. In what ways is your Stuck Point based on feelings
rather than facts?
10. In what ways is this Stuck Point focused on unrelated
parts of the story?
Listed below are several types of patterns of problematic
thinking that people use in different life situations. 3. Ignoring important parts of a situation
These patterns often become automatic, habitual 4. Oversimplifying things as good/bad or right/wrong
thoughts that cause us to engage in self‐defeating 5. Over‐generalizing from a single incident (a
behavior. Considering your own stuck points, find negative event is seen as a never‐ending pattern)
examples for each of the patterns. Write in the stuck
point under the appropriate pattern and describe how it 6. Mind‐reading (you assume people are thinking
fits that pattern. Think about how that pattern affects negatively of you when there is no definite evidence
you. for this).
7. Emotional reasoning (using emotions as proof,
1. Jumping to conclusions or predicting the future? e.g., “I feel fear so I must be in danger”)
2. Exaggerating or minimizing a situation (blowing
things way out of proportion or shrinking their
importance inappropriately).
Challenging Beliefs Worksheet
Describe the Write thought/Stuck Use Challenging Use the Problematic What else can I say instead
event, thought or Point related to Questions to examine Thinking Patterns of Column B?
belief leading to Column A. your automatic thoughts sheet to decide if this How else can I interpret
the unpleasant Rate belief in each from Column B. is one of your the event instead of
emotion(s). thought/stuck point problematic patterns of Column B?
below from 0-100% Consider if the thought is thinking. Rate belief in alternative
(How much do you balanced thought(s) from 0-100%
believe this thought?)
Evidence Against?
Exaggerating or minimizing
Patient and therapist Therapist introduces Habit or Fact?
Ignoring important parts
review Patterns of Challenging Beliefs Not including all information?
Challenging
ChallengingBeliefs
BeliefsWorksheet
Worksheet
CBW Worksheet Date:__________________Patient:_________________________ A. Situation B. Thought/ D. Challenging E. Problematic patterns F. Alternative Thought
stuck point Thoughts
Describe the Write thought/stuck Use Challenging Use the Problematic What else can I say
A D E event, thought point related to Column Questions to Thinking Patterns instead of Column B?
or belief leading A. examine your sheet to decide if this is How else can I interpret
Activating Event Challenging Questions New Belief
to the Rate belief in each automatic thoughts one of your problematic the event instead of
"Something happens"
unpleasant thought below from 0- from Column B. Is patterns of thinking. Column B?
Evidence for the stuck point? What can I tell myself in the emotion(s). 100% the thought Rate belief in alternative
future? (How much do you balanced and factual thought(s) from 0-100%
believe this thought?) or extreme?
B Evidence For? Jumping to conclusions
Belief/Stuck point Evidence against the stuck point?
"I tell myself something" Evidence Against?
Alternatives
Habit or Fact?
Exaggerating or minimizing
C
Is the stuck point extreme or
F
Challenging Extreme or exaggerated?
Overgeneralizing
believe the thought/stuck
point in Column B from 0-
exaggerated?
Focused on just one 100%
Consequence New Consequence C. Emotion(s) piece?
How does the stuck point make me How does the new belief make me Specify sad, angry, etc., Mind reading
feel? feel? and rate how strongly you Source dependable?
feel each emotion from 0-
Is the stuck point based on 100%
feelings rather than all the facts? Confusing possible with Emotional reasoning H. Emotion(s)
likely? Now what do you feel? 0-
100%
Based on feelings or
facts?
Focused on unrelated 85
parts?
Beliefs Related to Self Beliefs Related to Others
• Belief about dangerousness of other
• Belief you can protect yourself from harm people and expectancies about the
and have some control over events.
intent of others to cause harm, injury,
• Associated symptoms include anxiety,
intrusive thoughts about danger, irritability,
or loss.
startle responses, intense fears about future • Symptoms include avoidant or phobic
dangers. responses, social withdrawal.
Use the Challenging Beliefs
Worksheet throughout the rest of
therapy.
Each theme can relate to beliefs
about self or others
Challenging should help clients
move from extreme statements
to balanced statement.
Use of the full continuum of
thoughts and emotions
Challenging safety is primarily
Assess symptoms about putting actual probabilities
into perspective (e.g., if someone is
Review module and worksheets and assist as deployed twice and doesn’t die, that
doesn’t mean he will die the third
consultant (client takes on a greater role) time).
Focus on individual stuck points as well as the theme
for the sessions
Do traumas happen daily,
weekly, monthly, yearly? Are
Introduce the new theme and module they actually connected or is
the patient connecting only
some of the ‘dots’ (leaving out
Other specific assignments for sessions 11 & 12 all the good and neutral
events)?
Go over the module briefly regarding self and other Trust with regard to what?
trust. Generate a list of different types of trust and put on a
continuum.
Look at the Stuck Point Log, clarify the wording on any + +
trust stuck points and assign them for the next session. Loan money
+ secrets
Patient should continue to work on any other
No information
assimilated stuck points from the log.
-
Don’t be surprised if they test your trustworthiness - -
with new information or misbehavior. Emotional support
Many PTSD patients believe that
they should begin from a position Again, control with regard to what?
of complete trust or complete Control of emotions, control over other
distrust. people’s actions, control over urges,
control over future events?
They need to learn to start with “I
If the client says he/she is helpless or
have no information” and collect has no control, ask them to list all of the
data from there. decisions they made that day.
People make mistakes and it is Traumas sometimes follow choices and
important to give people second decisions but that doesn’t mean that the
chances. You can learn to trust more choice was a bad decision (outcome
when they don’t repeat mistakes. They based reasoning).
have changed for you.
GIVING POWER TAKING POWER
1. Being altruistic 1. Being assertive
2. Helping others in need or crisis 2. Setting limits and boundaries
POSITIVE
with others
3. Sharing yourself with another
Other control is concerned with authority, person as part of the give and 3. Being honest with yourself
the idea that other people are trying to take in relationships and others
control you, or that it is always bad when
other people are in positions of authority 1. Basing your behaviors solely on 1. Giving ultimatums
the reactions you expect from
and can tell you what to do. 2. Testing limits
NEGATIVE
others
3. Intentionally upsetting
2. Always placing the needs of
others for personal gain
others above your own
4. Behaving aggressively
3. Allowing others to easily access
your “buttons”
Beliefs related to Self Beliefs related to
Others
Being understood, Beliefs about other people Examples:
respected, and taken that match the reality of • People are uncaring, indifferent,
Belief in your own
seriously is basic to the other person and are selfish
worth. • People are bad, evil, or
the development of revised as new malicious
self‐esteem. information is received.
• Have them interacting • Start reengaging in
more with other previously enjoyed
people and focusing activities (approach
their attention Do at least one behavior)
outward (giving
Giving and compliments is a fairly nice thing for • Depression relapse
Receiving prevention
safe interaction) themselves every • Building of self‐
Compliments • Listening to what day (not earned, esteem (“Because
other people say to
them without filtering noncontingent) I’m worth it”)
and distorting • If they are not going
Purposes are to:
Purposes are to: • Considering other to be spending much
sources of information of their time on their
about them PTSD symptoms,
• Help dispute stuck what are they going
points about self to be doing?
•Ability to be alone
without feeling lonely,
Patient and therapist review empty or anxious
esteem issues and other •Being comfortable in
Challenging Beliefs Worksheets. Beliefs related to your own skin
•Enjoying your own
Patient and therapist review
• Need for intimacy, Challenging Beliefs Worksheets on
connection, and
closeness is a basic intimacy.
human need.
• This can be damaged Patient reads new Impact
Beliefs related through insensitive,
hurtful, or non‐
empathic responses
Statement.
to Others from others.
• Other intimacy
includes the full range
Patient and therapist review
course of therapy and skills
of relationships from learned.
acquaintances, to
deep friendships, and Patient and therapist identify
intimate partners.
future goals and issues which still
need attention.
The first 12 sessions are conducted exactly the
If the patient still has PTSD at 11th session the
same. therapist should review items on the PCL as well as
If someone responds early (<19 on PCL), the the Stuck Point log and discuss continuing for a few
therapist and client discuss whether he/she is more sessions.
finished with goals. If they decide to stop
early, therapist assigns final impact statement Do not assign the impact statement, but have them
and they have one more session. continue the two behavioral assignments.
At final session, they go over the changes in
meaning of event, content of session, and Sessions are based on completing CBWs on the
future goals. remaining stuck points. Continue doing CPT.