Advanced Turbomachinery Tutorial: Sliding Mesh: Purpose
Advanced Turbomachinery Tutorial: Sliding Mesh: Purpose
Advanced Turbomachinery Tutorial: Sliding Mesh: Purpose
Purpose
The purpose of this tutorial is to help you learn how to use the sliding mesh model in
FLUENT6.
Prerequisites
This tutorial assumes that you are familiar with the menu structure in FLUENT and that
you have solved some introductory tutorials. This tutorial uses the Multiple Reference
Frame (MRF) and Sliding Mesh Model (SMM) capabilities of FLUENT, so you should have
some experience with these. If not, Tutorials 8 and 10 of the FLUENT Tutorial Guide will
provide you with the necessary experience.
Problem Description
A 44-blade squirrel-cage air blower running at 2500 RPM is to be simulated numerically as
a 2-D model. The blower inlet total pressure is 200 Pa (gauge), and outlet pressure is at
the ambient. Before the sliding mesh simulation is performed, the MRF model is set up for
the blower in order to get a good initial condition and to help speed up convergence of the
transient SMM computation. The SMM simulation is run for several revolutions to reach a
time-periodic solution for the blower, and finally the results from SMM and from MRF are
compared with each other.
1. Start the 2D version of FLUENT and read the mesh file blower.msh.
Y
Z X
You may also want to plot the zones (fluid-inlet, fluid-rotor and fluid-casing) separately
to get familiar with the arrangement of the grid zones.
Step 2: Models
2. Define the k-epsilon turbulence model with the standard wall functions. Retain the
default values for the other parameters.
Step 3: Materials
Step 4: Interfaces
Define −→Grid Interfaces...
1e+00
1e-01
1e-02
1e-03
1e-04
1e-05
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Iterations
600.0000
500.0000
400.0000
Mass 300.0000
Weighted
Average
(pascal) 200.0000
100.0000
0.0000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Iteration
0.0000
-0.5000
-1.0000
-1.5000
Mass -2.0000
Flow
Rate -2.5000
(kg/s)
-3.0000
-3.5000
-4.0000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Iteration
At this point, the MRF model has generated a good initial condition for the sliding mesh
calculation.
Step 7: Postprocessing
6.24e+01
5.61e+01
4.99e+01
4.37e+01
3.74e+01
3.12e+01
2.50e+01
1.88e+01
1.25e+01
6.30e+00
7.09e-02
1.00e+03
8.00e+02
6.00e+02
4.00e+02
2.00e+02
0.00e+00
-2.00e+02
-4.00e+02
-6.00e+02
-8.00e+02
-1.00e+03
1. Change the solver to the Unsteady time condition. Retain the default values for the
other parameters.
(60/ω)
∆t (two deg. of rotation) = × 2 = 1.3333 × 10−4 s.
360
where ω is in rpm. Thus we use this time-step size in the iteration panel, run 180
time steps (= 1 revolution in this case) and inspect the results.
(a) Set the Time Step Size to 0.0001333 s and retain the default values for the other
parameters.
595.0000
590.0000
585.0000
580.0000
575.0000
Mass 570.0000
Weighted
565.0000
Average
(pascal) 560.0000
555.0000
550.0000
545.0000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time Step
-3.8650
-3.8700
-3.8750
-3.8800
Mass -3.8850
Flow
Rate -3.8900
(kg/s)
-3.8950
-3.9000
-3.9050
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time Step
Convergence history of Mass Flow Rate on pressure-outlet-9 (Time=2.3999e-02) May 10, 2002
FLUENT 6.0 (2d, segregated, ske, unsteady)
595.0000
590.0000
585.0000
580.0000
575.0000
Mass 570.0000
Weighted
565.0000
Average
(pascal) 560.0000
555.0000
550.0000
545.0000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time Step
-3.8600
-3.8800
-3.9000
-3.9200
Mass
Flow -3.9400
Rate
(kg/s)
-3.9600
-3.9800
-4.0000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time Step
Convergence history of Mass Flow Rate on pressure-outlet-9 (Time=1.2000e-01) May 10, 2002
FLUENT 6.0 (2d, segregated, ske, unsteady)
Once the iterations are done, save the case and data files. The monitors of total
pressure and mass flow rate on the outlet surface indicate that after a transient startup
period, a time-periodic solution has been established.
6.24e+01
5.62e+01
4.99e+01
4.37e+01
3.75e+01
3.12e+01
2.50e+01
1.88e+01
1.25e+01
6.30e+00
6.31e-02
Velocity Vectors Colored By Velocity Magnitude (m/s) (Time=1.2000e-01) May 14, 2002
FLUENT 6.0 (2d, segregated, ske, unsteady)
7. Display filled contours of static pressure for MRF and SMM solutions.
(a) Under Options, deselect Auto Range and set the values of Max and Min to -1000
and 1000 Pa respectively.
The SMM result is quite similar to the MRF solution shown before. This is because
the MRF model can be thought of as an approximation to the unsteady problem — like
taking a snapshot of the transient flow.
1.00e+03
8.00e+02
6.00e+02
4.00e+02
2.00e+02
0.00e+00
-2.00e+02
-4.00e+02
-6.00e+02
-8.00e+02
-1.00e+03
1.00e+03
8.00e+02
6.00e+02
4.00e+02
2.00e+02
0.00e+00
-2.00e+02
-4.00e+02
-6.00e+02
-8.00e+02
-1.00e+03
1.00e+03
8.00e+02
6.00e+02
4.00e+02
2.00e+02
0.00e+00
-2.00e+02
-4.00e+02
-6.00e+02
-8.00e+02
-1.00e+03
1.00e+03
8.00e+02
6.00e+02
4.00e+02
2.00e+02
0.00e+00
-2.00e+02
-4.00e+02
-6.00e+02
-8.00e+02
-1.00e+03
Results
There is no blade-to-blade variation in the time-averaged solution, in contrast to the MRF
and instantaneous sliding mesh solutions. This is reasonable since each blade passage sees
the same flow variations as it executes one revolution of motion, hence the time-averaged
solution for each blade passage is the same. One can also use other postprocessing tools in
FLUENT for comparing the SMM and MRF results in more detail (e.g., the total pressure
rise and the flow rate through the blower).
Summary
A 2-D model of a squirrel-cage air blower is simulated in FLUENT6 by using SMM. A
MRF model of the same blower is first set up and its results are provided as a good initial
condition to help speed up convergence in the SMM calculation. In the process, we have
demonstrated the detailed steps for setting up interfaces between grid blocks, assigning zones
to moving/stationary reference frames and the moving mesh, and specifying the associated
boundary conditions. We have also shown how to use the unsteady statistics feature in
FLUENT to obtain the time-averaged statistics (e.g., pressure) for time-periodic solutions.