Ten Lessons For Investors: Lesson 1: The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same
Ten Lessons For Investors: Lesson 1: The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same
Ten Lessons For Investors: Lesson 1: The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same
CHAPTER 15
Lesson 1: The more things change, the more they stay the same
Each of the investment stories listed in this book has been around for as long as
there have been financial markets. Notwithstanding this reality, investment advisors
rediscover these stories at regular intervals and present them as their own. To provide a
façade of novelty, they often give these stories new and fancy names (preferably Greek).
Calling a strategy of buying low PE stocks the Omega or the Alpha strategy seems to do
wonders for its curb appeal to investors. In addition, as more and more data on stocks
becomes available to investors, some have become more creative in how they use this data to
find stocks. In fact, the ease with which you can screen stocks for multiple criteria – low PE,
high growth and momentum – has allowed some to create composite screens that they can
then label as unique.
Proposition 1: Be wary of complex investment strategies with fancy names that claim to be
new and different.
who is uncomfortable with large risk exposures, you should avoid any high risk strategy, no
matter how promising it looks on paper. Why are some investors so willing to delude
themselves into thinking that they can earn high returns without taking much risk? One
reason may be that the risk in some strategies is hidden and shows up sporadically. These
strategies succeed most of the time and deliver solid and modest returns when they do, but
create large losses when they fail.
Proposition 3: If you cannot see the risk in a high returns strategy, you just have not
looked hard enough.
Lesson 5: Most stocks that look cheap are cheap for a reason
In every investment story in this book, there is a group of companies that are
identified as cheap. Early in this book, for instance, companies were categorized as cheap
because they traded at low multiples of earnings or below book value. At the risk of
sounding like professional naysayers, it should be noted that most of these companies only
looked cheap. There was generally at least one good reason, and in many cases more than
one, why these stocks traded at low prices. You saw, for instance, that many stocks that
traded at below book value did so because of their poor earning power and high risk and
that stocks that traded at low PE ratios did so because of anemic growth prospects.
Proposition 5: Cheap companies are not always good bargains.
and a great product all come to mind. Without contesting the fact that these are good
characteristics for a firm to possess, you have to still recognize that markets generally do a
good job of pricing in these advantages. Companies with powerful brand names trade at
high multiples of earnings, as do companies with higher expected growth. Thus, the
question that you have to answer as an investor is not whether having a strong brand name
makes your company more valuable, but whether the price attached to the brand name by the
market is too high or too low.
Proposition 6: Good companies may not be good investments.
While you may be justified in your views about market mistakes, it is prudent to
begin with a healthy respect for markets. While markets do make large mistakes in pricing
stocks and these mistakes draw attention (usually after the fact), they do an extraordinary
job for the most part in bringing together investors with diverse views and information about
stocks and arriving at consensus prices. When you do uncover what looks like a market
mispricing and an investment opportunity, you should begin with the presumption that the
market price is right and that you have missed some critical component in your analysis. It
is only after you have rejected all of the possible alternative explanations for the mispricing
that you should consider trying to take advantage of the mispricing.
Proposition 8: Markets are more often right than wrong.
Lesson 10: Luck overwhelms skill (at least in the short term)
The most depressing lesson of financial markets is that virtues such as hard work,
patience and preparation do not always get rewarded. In the final analysis, whether you
make money or not on your portfolio is only partially under your control and luck can play
a dominant role. The most successful portfolio managers of last year, all too often, are not
the ones with the best investment strategies but those who (by chance) happened to be at the
417
right place at the right time. It is true that the longer you invest, the more likely it is that luck
will start to even out and that your true skills will show through; the most successful
portfolio managers of the last 10 years are less likely to get there because they were lucky.
As an investor, you should take both success and failure with a grain of salt. Neither
is a reflection of your prowess or lack thereof as an investor or the quality of your
underlying investment strategy. While you may not able to manufacture good luck, you
should be ready to take advantage of it when it presents itself.
Proposition 10: It pays to be lucky.
Conclusion
Beating the market is neither easy nor painless. In financial markets, human beings,
with all their frailties, collect and process information and make their best judgments on
what assets are worth. Not surprisingly, they make mistakes and even those who believe that
markets are efficient will concede this reality. The open question, though, is whether you can
take advantage of these mistakes and do better than the average investor. You can but only if
you do your homework, assess the weaknesses of your investment strategies and attempt to
protect yourself against them. If you have a short time horizon, you will also need luck as
an ally.