Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.

org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

Developing an Authentic Assessment Model in Elementary School

Science Teaching
Siti Fatonah 1, PujiatiSuyata 2 , Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo 2
1.State Islamic University “Sunan Kalijaga” Yogyakarta
2.Yogyakarta State University

Abstract
This study aims at developing a model of authentic assessment, which can reveal the students’ creativity
and the potential , develop their character and fulfill the requirements of a good assessment. The developed
assessment model instrument consists of three kinds: (1) performance assessment, which consists of tasks and
assessment rubrics; (2) assessment of the character of the students and its assessment criteria; and (3) assessment
questionnaire of the scientific attitude. The problems formulated in this study are: (1) What is the procedure in
developing authentic learning assessment model of SD/MI grades IV and V in this study? (2) What is the quality
of the product?
The Authentic Assessment Model (AAM) in teaching science at elementary schools (SD/MI) in this study
was developed by using the Research and Development method based on the model of learning development by
Borg & Gall, which was modified. The procedure was divided into three stages of development, namely the
planning stage, development stage and trial stage. The subjects of the try out were student of grades IV and V in
eight elementary schools (SD / MI) in Sleman and Magelang. The data analysis techniques used were qualitative
and quantitative. The qualitative approach was used to analyze the input from experts and teachers and, the
quantitative approach was used to analyze the results of experts’ validation using Aikends validity, inter-rater
reliability using Kappa formula, and reliability of the instrument using the Alpha formula , and factor analysis
using SPSS and Lisrel.
Conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) The procedure of the authentic assessment model
development follows the stages of research and development. The stages include presurvey research, problem
analysis, analysis of curriculum, research studies, experts’ consultation, and drafting a model. The stages of
development include experts’ validation, reliability test, materialized test, teacher training, limited trials, and
expanded trials. The try out testing was carried out in eight elementary schools in Sleman and Magelang (2) The
quality of the developed products (a) the developed authentic assessment model has a valid criterion as a model,
in terms of aspects of the task, rubrics, authentic assessment principles, learning activities, and teaching
implementation, and all these aspects meet a very good criterion and can be used without revision. (b) The
instruments of AAM in teaching science classes IV and V have met the criteria as a valid, reliable, objective,
systematic, and practical instrument.
Keywords: authentic assessment, teaching science, elementary schools

A. INTRODUCTION
Traditional assessment in this case written test (paper and pencil test) which has been widely used in
science learning becomes very narrow meaning, because it is just to get the value or score that is almost entirely
based on the results of completed multiple choicetests. Research has shown that there is very little relationship
between the test scores to measure students' ability to use knowledge and skills in practical the context of
laboratory work or performative work. Therefore the written test has been widely criticized for emphasizing only
on memory and routine calculations or reasoning form of the more complex skills that actually used in the search
for knowledge (learning), so that the written test (paper and pencil test) can be called "non-
authentic"(http://academik.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/ jlemke/courses /alt.asmt/htm from the article" Issues in
Testing and Assessment: Science Education", accessed on March 22, 2012).
The written test produces relatively reliable individual values (steady). The traditional assessment
methods generate standardized tests norms in a large test population. Format items tend to be very similar (eg,
multiple choice tests) on the given standard conditions (alloted time, the rules which prohibitstudents from
communicating each other, taking notes or bringing other aids, etc.). Athough this approach can produce a
reliable value on other subjects, but it can only produce a superficial assessment, compared to the capabilities in
real life or with what is done by scientists (http://academik.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education /jlemke /courses
/alt.asmt/htm).
In 1989 the journal Phi Delta Kappanpublished P.Grant Wiggins’ writing that talks about authentic
assessment. Since then, education experts and practitioners began busily talking about the new alternative
measurement of learning outcomes. What is meant by alternative test is the alternative test of standardized
testing. The experts in teaching and designing curriculum actively participate in such discussions. Gronlund

50
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

(1998:2) also argues that in recent years (the 1990s) there was a reaction against the over-emphasis on the
written test. There were some criticisms againstto the written test, it was necessary to put more emphasis on
authentic assessmentin the form of real life tasks.
Competency-based assessment is an assessment conducted to determine the person's ability,
competence is the individual attributes of learners, thereforeit is an individualized competency-based assessment.
To ensure that the access is actually real individual competencies (the learner), then the assessment should be
done in an authentic (as real as everyday life). Authentic assessment isan on-going or continuous process,
therefore, this assessment should be carried out simultaneously when the learning process takes place. Thus the
competency-based assessment is authentic , ongoing, and individual. ZainulAzmawi defines authentic
assessment as performance assessment processwhich are multidimensional to behavior in the real situations
(like-life performance behavior).
Myron Attkin, et al (2001: 4) differentiate the assessment into 3, i.e assessment for learning (formative),
assessment of learning (summative) and assessment as learning (self and peer assessment). Based on the above
opinion assessment is not only to measure the learning process and learning outcomes, but it is also to improve
the learning process, to motivate students and to diagnose students’ weaknesses. Assessment for learning is
implemented integratedlyin the learning process and it is used to assess anything related to the learning process,
including to facilitate students to learn. Formative assessment is conducted periodically in the overall
instructional unit and become an integral part of learning .Formative assessment produces feedback to students
on their learning progress so that they can plan their further learning activities. Formative assessment also
generates feedback for teachers related to the effectiveness of their teaching.
Most teachers are not interested in the authentic assessment or the performance assessment and do not
want to use it. In general, they argue that to conduct an authentic assessment spends more time and energy and it
is too expensive. Moreover, authentic assessments need to be designed properly. The opinion is not correct
(Nuryani, 2009:2). Assessing the performancethrough writtentest is invalid because it does not measure what
should be measured. If the performance assessment is done to some students and not designed well then the
result can not be justified, because it is inconsistent. Thus perhaps it will be unfair to assess the students’
performance. According to Wiggins (1995:2-3) designing and implementing performance assessment is very
efficient, because it is steady or consistent (reliable), not expensive and do not waste time. Standards can not be
made without doing performance-based assessment.
Based on preliminary research data (SitiFatonah, 2011:18), in various districts (Muntilan, Salam, and
Dukun) Magelang district, the assessment was done in science learning SD/MI using written tests, such as the
late replay subjects, general tests and home assignments (100%), while the performance assessment and self-
assessment has not been done (0%). Likewise for project assessment and portfolio assessment, all teachers has
never used the authentic assessment. The preliminary results showed that the assessment system developed in
SD/MI in Magelang district was not in accordance with the assessment system in the Competency-Based
Curriculum. Performance assessment and self-assessment had not been done by the teachers, but the curriculum
for science subjects demandsteachers to conduct performance assessment, especially in laboratory activities.
Without conducting performance assessment, itis difficult for teachers to evaluate students’basic competence,
especially concerning the ability of science skills process and scientific attitudes. It also shows that the teaching
methods used are still dominated by lecturing , question and answer, questions and exercises, while the method
of demonstration, laboratory work (lab) get a little portion.The result can be used as a reference for developing
alternative learning strategies and authentic assessment models in teaching science , especially at the level of
SD/MI.
In practice it seems that there is an incompatibility between teaching science at the elementary school
and the assessment used. The common assessment process conducted by the teachers is only to describe the
students’ mastery of concept , as the result, the goals of Science Subjects are not achieved yet and are not
portrayed as a whole (SitiFatonah, 2011:179). Therefore, it is necessary to have an evaluation technique that is
able to cover all aspects of the product and the process, i.e by applying authentic assessment. Although authentic
assessment is very important, but it is based on field observations (SitiFatonah, 2011: 43), the teachers of MI/SD
find it difficult because they do not have a model of authentic assessment with its usage guidelines,. Therefore, it
is necessary to develope an authentic assessment models with its guidelines. The objectives of this research and
development are : 1) to develop a product in the form of a model of authentic assessment in teaching science to
students of elementary schools (SD/MI) grade IV and V, which met the
requirements of a good assessment, completed with its guidelines, 2) to describe the procedure ofdeveloping
authentic assessment in teaching science to students of elementary schools (SD/MI) grade IV and V and 3) to
describe the characteristics of the final product of authentic assessment models in teaching science to students of
elementary schools (SD/MI) grade IV and V as informative report. Based onthe three research objectives above
there are seven research questions, namely: 1) What is the objective conditions of the implementation of

51
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

assessment in teaching science to students of elementary schools (SD/MI) grade IV and V recently? 2) How to
develop authentic assessment model in teaching science to students of elementary schools (SD/MI) grade IV and
V? 3) How is the quality of authentic assessment models in teaching science as productthis research snd
development? 4) What are the characteristicsof authentic assessment model as the product of this research and
development in teaching science at elementary schools ? 5) How is the effectiveness of the
model of authentic assessment in teaching science as the product ofthis research and development? 6) Does the
usage of authentic assessment models influence students’ character building? 7) What are the factors inhibiting
and supporting the successful implementation of authentic assessment models in teaching science to students of
elementary schools ( SD/MI) grsde IV and V?

B. Research Methods
The procedures to conduct this Research and Developmentwere divided into three stages, i.e: planning,
design & development, and try-out modeling. The procedureof AAMdevelopment in teaching science in SD/MI
was done through the following steps.
1. Planning
At the planning stage, there are 5 steps, namely: a) analyzing the needs in the development of authentic
assessment models in teaching science SD/MI, with the objective condition assessment study conducted by the
science teachers MI/SD for this, b) identifying the characteristics of learners (identify learner characteritics), c)
creating the planning documents (produce a planning document) regarding materials and other things required to
make the product, d) determining and collecting resources (determine and collect resources) such as from books,
internet, school, photos, videos, etc., and e) brainstorming (conduct initial brainstorming) is holding discussions
with teachers of SD/MI.
2. Design & Development
At the design stage, the activities undertaken included authentic assessment modelling, validation
experts and users (teachers), readability test, teacher training, testing and evaluation models.
a. Preparation of Authentic Assessment Model (AAM)
AAM preparation included modeling, validation specialists, and train teachers. The model consisted of
instruments: lesson plans, student work sheets, assessment of performance for class IV, observation sheets of
scientific attitude to class IV and V, science process observation sheet of science process skills for class V,
observation sheet of teachers’ activities in the classroom, and the effectiveness of AAM questionnaire. In
addition, scoring guidelineswas also arranged for each instrument as well as the use of AAM guide books in the
classroom.The next stepwas the validation of AAM activities which had been arranged in the previous stage by
involving the experts of education science, measurement and testing , and experienced science teachers (senior
teacher). The revised model validationwas re-validated by experts. Validation activities by the experts and
revision activities by the researcher continued until the AAM prototype was ready to be tested in the classroom.
Once the prototype models validated by experts, the next activity is to train teachers to use AAM in the
classroom.In order to practice it the teachers should use guidebooksto conduct an authentic assessment.
b. Readability Test
Legibility trial conducted in three forms : seminar, informal discussion, and practices in the classroom.
Seminar was held on Saturday, May 26, 2012 and it was attended by MI science teachers, lecturers, and students.
Informal discussion with MI science teachers was held on Saturday, June 2, 2012. Practices in classroom
activities were carried out 2 times,i.ein the class of Science and Teaching Science at Islamic Elementary School
Teachers Study Program of Tarbiyah and Teaching Faculty in UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, on Monday,
June 4, 2012. The practice of students activities is conducted to determine the legibility of the scenarios that have
been designed. Based on the results of this practice there was some revision on the learning scenario in order to
make a lesson plan. The result of readability test obtained that the lesson plan can be put into practice, duties/
tasks within performance can be implemented in a specific time.
The second legibility test was conducted at MI Darul Huda Sirahan Sleman and SDN, this was done to re-check
the readability of the learning scenarios, lesson plans and instruments of authentic assessment. The result of this
readability test showed that not all of lesson plans has not been all practicable, tasks/task performance could be
done only by a few students. Observation sheets of students performance were only some completed,because it
was too many items, so they needed to be revised.
c. Validation Experts and Users
Validation experts and practitioners in this study was conducted by the Focus Group Discussion (FGD)
and it was conducted in 2 phases, namely pre-limited trial and after/post limited trial. The number of experts and
users involved in this activity was based on the needs of research. Validation is done to provide assessment,
advice and improvement on models that made by the researchers through using evaluation sheets. The experts
consisted of 5 people with science education background, and the users consisted of 12 science teachers.

52
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

d. Train the Teacher

There were 12 science teachers trained in this program.They were from MI Darul Huda, MI
MaarifSirahan, SD Muh. Sapen, SDN Sirahan II , SDN Sedayu I, MIN I Tempel, SDIT Zaid bin Tsabit, and MI
Tempel. This training program was carried out in 1 day.The researcher explained the procedures and principles
of conducting AAM to those teachers before they implemented and tested the usage of AAM to teach science in
their classrooms.
e. Try-out/Testing the product
Testing the product was conducted in oreder to determine the suitability or the relevance between
theoretical concepts and the empirical data which discussed separately in the following testing product..
f. Evaluation
Evaluation of activities was carried out in two stages, i.e evaluation during the process of testing
product and evaluation after the testing product. Evaluation during the process of testing product was done to get
better improvement of the model and in the effort to help students by giving them feedback. In regard to the
information obtained from instruments like lesson plan, performance tasks, observation sheets, and student self-
assessment became the main reference.The teacher should arouse students’ responsibility,awareness and
motivation in learning by giving assistance based on their needs.
Evaluation after testing product was done to determine if there was an increase in the quality of student
learning. For this purpose, the reseracher used the data during the testing process,i.e the results of repeated
measures .Based on the description of the stages in the development of methods Borg and Gall, it is known that
the development of this model is practical and easy to implement in the context of the classroom, according to
the underlying principles of authentic assessment, and efficient in terms of saving the time.
3. Phase of Testing Model
Testing model or product according to Borg and Gall is a very important part in the Research and
Development, which is performed after the designing of the product finished. Testing model or product aims to
determine whether the product is fit to use or not. Testing model / product also served to what extent the product
can achieve the learning goals and objectives. Good models or products should meet two criteria: the criteria of
learning (instructional criteria) and performance criteria (presentation criteria). The tests were done 3 times: (1)
Test-specialists (2) limited test conducted on a small group of users of the product, (3) field testing to test the
quality of the developed model or product which is empirically valid .
Designing the development of assessment model generated during the development stage of a prototype
model of the semi-perfect . The prototype is a reference for the establishment of an advanced stage of
development of the prototype of designed product.
Testing model phase included testing which was continued with the evaluation, revision, testing experts
and users. The goal of this stage is to validate the stabilized prototype and the authentic assessment model in
teaching science. Therefore, there were some instruments and a variety of devices to develop in this research. .
The flow model of research and development on the authentic assessment in teaching science is shown in the
conceptual schema in Figure 1.
The figure 1 shows that the pre-development phase required needs analysis which was done in the
preliminary research to obtain information on the assessment of teaching science as the basis for determining the
development of authentic assessment model. Stage of development obtained tentative assessment model to
develop, and the test phase of the development model of the final product obtained authentic assessment model
of teaching science. In the testing model phase, it will be described more detail in the testing product.

53
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

1. Planning

Need Analysis

2 Developing

3. Try-out Model

Experts’
assessment
validation
&science

Review Revision Analysis Inappropriate

RevisionI

Try-out Limited
Analysis RevisionII Try-out
one class

Analysis Unlimited
RevisionIII Analysis
Try-out

Revision
IV

4. Final Product AAM

Figure Developing Procedure AAM

Adapted from Dick & Carey (2005) and Borg & Gall (2003)

54
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

C. Results and Discussion

Try-out data presented in this chapter is the data obtained after the research stage i.e the stage of
development , a series of procedures in bith stages which can answer the first formulation of the problems. For
pre-development activities, the researcher has developed a model of assessment sheets which were validated by
experts in education and science assessment. As the result, the assessment sheets were valid and applicable used
with a litlle revision.
Then,the assessment sheet is used by the experts to assess/validate AAM. Expert validation in this study
was conducted through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and it was conducted in 2 phases, namely pre-limited
trial and after/post s limited trial. Assessment of each instrument models was done by the same person to get
consistency and to facilitate expert in evaluating it. Assessment was conducted qualitatively and quantitatively.
Qualitative assessment was done by providing input/comment in the form of a note directlyy, while the
quantitative assessment was done by using the score with the scale of ( 1, 2, 3, and 4) for each item. Assessment
was done by 3 people who had educational background in science education and educational evaluation.
Instruments sheets that were evaluated by experts then were revised . Pre-limited trial performed by an
expert and measurement science education. After limited trial/testing, the results were analyzed by the expert of
assessment, and carried out repair/revision based on input which was provided by the expert. These assessed
aspects are duties/tasks, rubrics/assessment criteria, principles of authentic assessment, learning activities, the
implementation of AAM in the classroom, and the general assessment of AAM. The assessment criteria used
were: bad , fairly good, good and very good . The summary of the results of the assessment done by rater
(assessor),were presented in Table 1. Shown at the table it appears that the pre-limited trial , and after/post -
limited trial, the three assessments showed good results in all aspects . In the general assessment instrument
evaluation models on a limited trial/testing can be used with slight revisions, and, it can be used without
revisions after limited testing/trial.
Table 1
Authentic Assessment Model Result

Validation Result
No Aspect assessed Pre-limited After Limited
Try-out Try-out
1 Task Good Good
2 Assessment Criteria Good Good
3 Assessment Authentic Good Good
4 Learning Activity Good Good
5 Implementation AAM in Classroom Good Good
6 General Assessment B A
Explanation:
A = can be used without revision
B = can be used with slight revision
C = can be used with a lot of revisions
D = can not be used
Validity of the data analysis by experts was conducted by using the formula Aikend (Anwar, 2012:34).
This analysis was used to determine content validity. The summary of the results of the validity analysis Aikend
was shown in Table 2 below. In conclusion, according to the experts , this authentic assessment models had the
calculation validity Aikend which ranged from 0.666 to 1. There were 4 items that have validity under 0.7 so that
they can be considered invalid. The summary of results of validation treated by experts was shown in Table 2,
while the inter-rater reliability assessment by experts was displayed in Table 3.

55
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

Table 2
Treatment Instrument Validation Result by Expert
NO V Aikends AAM Lesson Plan AAM
Affectivity

1 Before Try-out 4 invalid 2 invalid 2 invalid

25 valid 7 valid 8 valid
2 After Try-out 2 invalid 0 invalid 2 invalid
27 valid 9 valid 8 invalid

Table 3
Treatment Instrument Reliability by Expert
NO KappaCoefficient AAM Lesson Plan AAM Affectivity

1 Before Try-out 0.615 0.65 0.615

2 After Try-out 0.737 0.835 0.737

Instruments in addition to validation by experts, was also validated by the teacher. Based on the results
of teacher assessment in science learning AAM has been developed to meet the requirements of a good
instrument, that is valid, reliable, objective, systematic and practical, so that it can be said AAM is effective for
using. The results validate the effectiveness of AAM by the teacher can be seen in Table 4, whereas the validity
of the results by teacher lesson plans can be seen in Table 5.

Table 4
AMM Affectivity Validation Result by Teacher

Aspects assessed Assessment Result Mean Explanation

Validitas 3.416 Valid
Reliability 2.68 Reliable
Objective 3.75 Objective
Systematic 4 Systematic
Practical 3.81 Practical
Totality 3.53 Effective

Table 5
Lesson Plan Validation Result by Teacher
No Validation Result
Limited Try-out Extensive Try-out
Aspects assessed
Mean Explanation Mean Explanation
Assessment Assessment
2 Lesson Plan 3.2 Good 3.6 Very Good
3 Language 3.4 Good 3.7 Very Good
5 General Assessment B A

To determine the feasibilityof AMM-class observation was done by two observers. The Implementation
of the observation can be seen in Table6, while the inter-observer reliabilitycan be seen inTable7.

56
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

Table 6
Extensive Try-out Materialize Observation Result

Try-out Place % Materialize Inter-rater reliability Explanation

Pert 1 Pert 2
SD MuhSapen 100 1 0.93 Materialize and Reliable
MI MaarifSirahan 93 1 0.93 Materialize and Reliable
SDN Sedayu 93 1 0.93 Materialize and Reliable

Table 7
AAM Materialize Inter-rater Reliability on Classroom

Try-out Place % Inter-rater reliability Explanation

Materiali
ze
Meeting
1 2 3 4 5
MIN Tempel 99 1 1 0.93 1 1 Materialize and
Reliable
SD IT 94 1 0,93 0.87 0.93 0.87 Materialize and
Reliable
MI Tempel 99.6 1 1 0.93 1 1 Materialize and
Reliable

Based on the implementation of AAM in teaching science inextensive testing, reliability analysis of
each data collection instrument consisted of a performance assessment instrument for class IV, instrument
performance observation sheet for class V, scientific attitude questionnaires and character observation
instruments. The results of the calculation of the reliability of each instrument were shown in Table 8.

Tabel 8
Data Collecting Instrument Reliability Result
No Instrument Name Alpha Reliability

1 Performance Instrument for material classIV about heat 0.832

2 Observation sheet Instruments for performance material 0.794

in testing vitamin C
3 Scientific Attitudes Questionnaire Instruments 0.832

4 Character Observation Instruments 0.789

Based on the objectives and research questions and the study to the results and the discussion of
research regarding the development models authentic assessment in teaching science at eementary schools
( SD/MI), then the findings of research are:
1. Objective conditions of teaching science at elementary schools (SD/ MI) :
a. The condition of teaching science at elementary schools (SD/MI) used the conventional approach. There was
one direction communication which was dominated by the teacher. The lesson plans have not become
reference in implementation of teaching and learning process. The learning assessment was still dominated
with cognitive aspects. The assessment was conducted by written test/ paper test. Only a few teachers who
carry out the learning process assessment.
b. Teachers' perception toward assessment in teaching science is very good and they have high motivation to
perform innovation to the implementation of teaching science and assessment, and supported with students'

57
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

high learning interest who use assistive devices nature tangibly which exist in the students’ environment .

Figure 1

Feedback

Identification of the
CTL approach • knowledge
Problems
STS learning • skills
Authentic questions
Model • process
• Creativity
Invitation
• Attitude
• Application
Scientific
interconnection
Authentic Task
Observation
Exploration

Elaborate task product

Discuss idea &concept Science learning achievement/
Output of learning science

Explanation
Teaching Science

Performance & Product

Assessment

Action

Authentic Assessment

Authentic Assessment Model

2. Development Process Model

Authentic Assessment Model (AAM) in teaching science at elementary schools (SD/MI) in this study was
developed by using the method of Research and Development, based on the model of learning development Borg
& Gall. The stages include pre-survey research, problem analysis, analysis of curriculum, research studies,
expert consultations, preparation of prototype models. Stages of development include expert validation,
readability test, materialize test , teacher training, limited trials, and trials expanded.

58
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

3. Quality AAM
a. Based on the model validity test conducted by experts, AAM in teaching science to students of elementary
schools (SD/MI) has developed criteria as valid model, in terms of aspects of the task/assignment, rubrics,
principles of authentic assessment , learning activities and implementation of learning. All of these aspects
have a very good criteria and they can be used without revision.
b. Based on test validity which was done, all instruments of AAM in teaching science met the criteria as a good
instrument. To test the performance of classroom observation instruments IV, the results of the content
validity of this instrument is valid. To test the performance of classroom observation instrument V is based
on the validity of the test is valid. For the attitude scale assessment questionnaire instrument validity test is
considered invalid by the 22 attitude statements. For character observation instruments, 8 statements were
invalid.
c. Based on the results of the reliability test, all of AAM instruments in teaching science to students of SD/MI
developed in this study met the criteria as a good instrument in terms of reliability. The classroom
observation instrument for grade IV performance has reliability 0.794. This instrument is considered reliable
category. The classroom observation instrument for grade V performance has a reliability of 0.834, It is also
considered reliable category. For students of character observation instruments, had a reliability of 0.82,
including reliable. For scientific attitude questionnaire instrument,it had a reliability of 0.94, so it is said
reliable criteria.
d. Based on observations of AAM feasibility to implementation in the classroom, during the limited testing and
extensive testing, the results obtained enforceability of the average greater than 90%, the inter-observer
reliability ranged from 0.87 to 1. Therefore AAM in teaching science at elementary schools ( SD/MI ) can be
well performed , for each test.

4. The main characteristics of AAM

Characteristics of AAM in teaching science at elementary schools(SD/M), which was developed in this study
are:
a. To build a harmonious relationship, sharing responsibility between teachers and students
b. To implement the assesssment integratedly with the learning process
c. To put emphasis on “how to learn” in oder to make learning become more meaningful and realistic for
students and teachers
The benefits of implementing AAM in teaching science :
a. To develop a scientific attitude and performance of students.
b. To diagnose learning difficulties or students’misconceptions towards learning, so that they can be given
help and guidance.
c. To obtain sufficient information which is in accordance with the real problems faced by students and
teachers.
d. To establish good communication between teachers and students, and students with students, build
awareness and responsibility in a professional teacher through reflection on the outcome of each
meeting, developing the potential, creativity, motivation, self-confidence and independence.
e. To encourage teachers and students to make continuous improvement to and i.e to improve the quality
of teaching and learning continuously.
f. Foster mutual trust between teachers and students in the assessment.
AAM weaknesses in teaching science :
AAM is designed based on the principles of learning assessment for, but there are some principles that
have not been done in this model. The limitations of this assessment model are as follows :
a. Application of peer assessment was not done, so the obtained information only came from the students and
the teachers.
b. This model can only be successfully used by teachers who have good preparations , and who were trained
well on AAM.
c. Subjectivity possibly occurs in this assessments.
d. It takes a lot of time for teachers to put underlying principles and strategies into practice.

5. The Effectiveness of AAM

Based on the analysis of questionnaires filled out by teachers and the implementation of AAM in teaching
science, this assessment model is considered effective because it is valid, reliable, objective, systematic and
practical.

59
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

6. The influence of implementing AAM to students’ character building

Implementation of AAM in science learning provide a positive and significant influence on the students’
character building, evidenced by the significant differences of the student's character in the class using AAM and
the students’character on the class using conventional assessment.

7. The supporting and inhibiting factors that may affect the implementation of authentic assessment
models in teaching science are as follows:
a. Supporting factors: (1) the ability of teachers to create a conducive,democratic,fun learning
environment and to consider students as a subject of study, and the teacher acts as a facilitator, (2) the
willingness and motivation of the teachers to change their views and ways of teaching in which the
conventional assessment implemented in teaching science, (3) the willingness of teachers to use their
time optimally for desing lesson plans and assessments, and to implement this model seriously, so that
every step of learning that has been designed, especially in terms of delivering competencies,
motivating students and guiding students to have experiment and to conduct group discussions or class
discussions, (4) Teachers’ skills in stimulating teacher and encouraging students to express opinions,
ideas, or asking questions, explaining the findings, and providing empirical facts, formulate conclusions
and find relationships between problem aspects. (5) positive attitudes of the students
towards science subjects (6) high students’ enthusiasm to the AAM learning process because the
climate created by the teacher in the classroom is more integrative and contextually related to the real-
life environment from day-to-day, (7) high students’ motivation toward AAM because this model was
developed in accordance with the characteristics of the student's age (SD/MI), (8) the active
participation of students in each stage of AAM in teaching science, because this model allows students
to do activities which are real and unforgettable.
b. Inhibiting factors: (1) It is difficult to adapt to the AAM in teaching science using STS learning models,
and it was hard to leave the conventional model of learning when the mastery of learning concept is not
good. (2) Teachers still dominated classroom activities so that students did not have the opportunity to
construct their own knowledge, (3) Teachers made the teaching and learning program only to fulfill
administrative requirements so it doesn’t serve its function in the classsroom (5) It is hard to change
teachers’ habits which view students’ learning achievement is only determined by the mastery of
subject matter, not by the learning process, such as the ability of students in conducting experiments,
discussion, conclusions, discipline, creativity and scientific attitude.(1) Students are not ready to build
their prior/background knowledge, so that they are not ready to participate in the learning process, (2)
Students are not accustomed to do science learning process ctivities such as doing experiment in the
science lab, conducting discussions in the early meeting of AAM implementation in teaching science .
The development research was conducted in accordance with the study procedures and rules
that were determined, but the obtained results d can not be said as a perfect model of authentic
assessment, because there are some limitations in the AAM development of research in teaching science
at (SD/MI).The limitations are as follows:
1. This model is only applied in teaching science at SD/MI grade IV and V, because its effectiveness
is not yet known if it is applied in the lower classes, namely class I-III, or class VI.
2. This model has not developed the peer assessment, so that the information about learning outcomes
is only obtained from the students and teachers themselves.
3. To implement the AAM in teaching science at elementary schools (SD/MI) requires initial training
for teachers to develop knowledge and skills in the planning, implementation of the learning
process, and assessment/ assessment of learning as a model for the assessment of learning and as a
new inovation in teaching science.
D. Conclusions
Conclusions of this study are as follows. (1) Procedures to develop authentic assessment model were
done through the stages of Research and Development. The stages include pre- survey research, problem
analysis, analysis of curriculum, research studies, expert consultations, the drafting of the model. Stages of
development include expert validation, readability test, t feasibilitytest, teacher training, limited trials, and
expanded trials . Tests were conducted at eight elementary schools and madrasah in Sleman and Magelang (2)
Quality of the research products (a) the authentic assessment model met valid criteria, including all aspects like
the task, rubrics, authentic assessment principles, learning activities and teaching practices,.All of these aspects
have very good criteria and they can be used without revision, (b) all instruments of AAM in teaching science at
class IV and V met the criteria as valid , reliable, objective, systematic, and practical instruments.

60
Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.13, 2013

E. References
Azmawi Zainul, (2001). Alternative assessment. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti.
Azwar Saifudin. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Dick, W. & Carey, J.O. (2005). The Systematic design of instruction (6thed). Boston: Pearson.
Gronlund, Norman E. (1998). Assesment of student achievement. Sixth Editiojn, Boston, Allyn and Bacon
http://academik.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/jlemke/courses/alt.asmt/htm dari artikel “Issues in Testing and
Assessment: Science Education”, diakses pada tanggal 22 Maret 2012.
Myron Atkin. J. at. all, (2001). Classroom Assessment and the National Science. National Academic Press.
Nuryani Y. Rustaman, (2009). Penilaian Otentik (Authentic Assessment) dan Penerapannya dalam
Pendidikan Sains. Makalah.
Siti Fatonah. (2011). Pengembangan Instrumen Pembelajaran Sains yang Humanis di SD/MI. Laporan Hasil
Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

61
This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.

More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org

CALL FOR PAPERS

The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for
submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission
instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/

The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.

IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners

EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open

Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar