Foundations of Employee Motivation: C H A P T E R

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

C H A P T E R 5

Foundations of
Employee
Motivation

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Motivation at Capital One

Capital One has a motivated


workforce by hiring people
with an entrepreneurial spirit,
challenging them through
stretch goals, and continually
evaluating individual and
organizational performance. © J. Mahoney/ Richmond Times Dispatch

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Challenges of Motivating Employees

• Layoffs, restructuring
• Damaged trust, commitment
• Flatter organizations
• Fewer supervisors to monitor
performance
• Changing workforce
• Younger staff have different © J. Mahoney/ Richmond Times Dispatch
needs
• Diverse workforce variety of
motivation practices

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content vs. Process Motivation Theories

• Content theories
• explain why people have different needs at
different times

• Process theories
• describe the processes through which needs are
translated into behavior

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Needs Hierarchy Theory
Needs Hierarchy
Theory

Self- • Maslow arranged five needs in a


Actualization hierarchy
Esteem • Satisfaction-progression process
• People who experience
Belongingness self-actualization desire more
rather than less of this need
Safety

Physiological

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
ERG Theory
Needs Hierarchy ERG
Theory Theory

Self- • Alderfer’s model has


Actualization three sets of needs
Growth
Esteem • Adds
frustration-regression
process to Maslow’s
Belongingness Relatedness
model
Safety
Existence
Physiological

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Theories of Motivation
Needs Hierarchy ERG Motivator--Hygiene McClelland’s
Theory Theory Theory Learned Needs

Self- Need for


Actualization Achievement
Growth Motivators
Need for
Esteem
Power

Need for
Belongingness Relatedness
Affiliation

Safety Hygienes
Existence
Physiological

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pamela Grof’s Need for Achievement

Pamela Grof’s high need for


achievement is apparent from
her many business initiatives
since the age of 12. “I come
from a very entrepreneurial
family,” explains Grof, who
founded web design company
InterVisual in Calgary, © K. Morison/Calgary Herald

Canada.

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Creating a Company of Entrepreneurs

Companies support
entrepreneurship by:
• clarifying the firm’s purpose
and shared values
• supporting and reinforcing
entrepreneurial behavior
• creating small businesses
within the larger organization © K. Morison/Calgary Herald

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Implications of Content Theories

• Match rewards with employee needs


• Offer employees a choice of rewards
• people have different needs at different
times

• Limit use of financial rewards as a


source of motivation

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Expectancy Theory of Motivation
E-to-P P-to-O Outcomes
Expectancy Expectancy & Valences

Outcome 1
+ or -

Outcome 2
Effort Performance + or -

Outcome 3
+ or -

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Expectancy Theory in Practice

• Increasing the E-to-P expectancy


• training, selection, resources, clarify roles, provide
coaching and feedback

• Increasing the P-to-O expectancy


• Measure performance accurately, explain how
rewards are based on past performance

• Increasing outcome valences


• Use valued rewards, individualize rewards,
minimize countervalent outcomes

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Elements of Equity Theory
• Outcome/input ratio
• inputs -- what employee contributes (e.g. skill)
• outcomes -- what employees receive (e.g. pay)

• Comparison other
• person/people we compare ratio with
• not easily identifiable

• Equity evaluation
• compare outcome/input ratio with
the comparison other

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Overreward vs Underreward Inequity
Comparison
You
Other

Overreward Outcomes
Outcomes
Inequity
Inputs Inputs

Underreward Outcomes
Inequity Outcomes

Inputs Inputs

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Consequences of Inequity

• Change inputs
• Change outcomes
• Change perceptions
• Leave the field
• Act on the comparison other
• Change the comparison other

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Equity Sensitivity

• Benevolents
• Tolerant of being underrewarded

• Equity Sensitives
• Want ratio to be equal to the
comparison other

• Entitleds
• Prefer receiving proportionately more
than others

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Goal Setting at CDW Computer Centers

CDW Computer Centers has


become a leading direct
marketer of computers and
peripherals by setting specific,
challenging goals for its
employees. “We set BHAGS --
which are big, hairy aggressive © J. Robinson/ Chicago Tribune

goals,” says CEO John A.


Edwardson (shown here).

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Effective Goal Setting
Specific

Relevant

Challenging
Task Task
Effort Performance
Commitment

Participation

Challenging

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Effect of Goal Difficulty on Performance
High
Task Performance

Area of
Optimal
Goal
Difficulty

Low Moderate Challenging Impossible

Goal Difficulty
McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
C H A P T E R 5
Foundations of
Employee
Motivation

McShane/ Von Glinow 2/e Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like