Answers To Question Sheet 2, Solidification: C /C C F

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Part IB Materials Science & Metallurgy Course A, Metals and Alloys

Answers to Question Sheet 2, Solidification

1. Directional solidification is used, for example, in the growth of single crystals of turbine blades
for jet engines, and in the growth of crystals for lasers.

For Al–Cu, the partition coefficient is from the phase diagram k = 5.7/33 = 0.17. The
concentration in the acceptable solid should be a quarter that in the alloy as a whole, so
Cs /C0 = 0.25. When this is substituted into the Scheil equation:

Cs = kC0 (1 − fs )k−1

where fs is the fraction of solid, the fraction of acceptable bar is found to be 0.37.

2. Dendrite formation requires an undercooled liquid ahead of the interface. Thermal dendrites
are rare indeed, when pure materials solidify with a negative temperature gradient in the liquid
ahead of the interface. In constitutional supercooling the undercooling arises because of solute
concentration variations ahead of the interface.

For Al–Si, the partition coefficient is from the phase diagram k = 1.65/11.7 = 0.14 and the
liquidus gradient mL = 660−577
11.7 = 7.1 K wt%−1 .

For a planar front the interface has to be stable to perturbations i.e. the temperature gradient
must be larger than the liquidus–temperature gradient. The limiting temperature gradient is
therefore
dT m C (1 − k)v 7.1 × 0.3 × 0.86 × 10−5
= L 0 = = 26169 K m−1
dx kDL 0.14 × (5 × 10−9 )
This is a large gradient which is difficult to achieve in practice. Hence most impure alloys tend
to solidify by a dendritic mode.

3. M 7 has large chunks of angular silicon plates which render the alloy brittle because it is easy
to fracture silicon. M 8 has much finer particles of silicon which are less easy to crack.
Small concentrations of solute generally influence the development of microstructure through
kinetic effects. They may segregate to grain boundaries thus reducing grain boundary energy
and hence making them less effective as heterogeneous nucleation sites for precipitation (e.g.
parts per million of boron has a large effect on transformations in steel). They may produce
minute inclusions which are potent nucleation sites (e.g. spheroidal graphite cast iron and
Al–Si). Segregation can also influence interface mobility.

The low density of silicon helps compensate for the shrinkage accompanying solidification, thus
producing less porosity in the casting. In addition, silicon increases the fluidity of the melt,
thus allowing complex castings to be manufactured. Many modern automobile engine blocks
are cast from Al–Si alloys.

You can see micrographs and descriptions of specimens M 7 and M 8 on

http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/Department/Teaching/online.html

4. Assume Newtonian conditions with constant cooling rate Ṫ and zero latent heat (given that
we deal here with glass formation). For interfacial heat transfer,

h∆T 2 × 105 (1000 − 300)


q = h∆T = cṪ x, x= = = 3.5 × 10−5 m
cṪ 4 × 106 × 106

You could have calculated the Biot had you been given the thermal conductivity of the alloy,
which is 40 W m−1 K−1 :

Biot number Bi = (2 × 105 )(35 × 10−6 )/40 = 0.17

Since this is small, the assumption of Newtonian cooling is justified.

Iron base glasses are magnetically soft because of the absence of microstructure. They can
be used in the manufacture of transformers to reduce hysteresis losses. The lack of a mi-
crostructure also gives the glasses a high corrosion resistance since there is a lack of sites for
the nucleation of corrosion.

H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia

You might also like