Bukas Emergencies in Dermatology 2013 PDF
Bukas Emergencies in Dermatology 2013 PDF
Bukas Emergencies in Dermatology 2013 PDF
Karthik Krishnamurthy
Editors
Buka’s Emergencies
in Dermatology
Editors
Bobby Buka, MD JD Annemarie Uliasz, MD
Private Practice Private Practice
Section Chief Clinical Instructor
Department of Dermatology Department of Dermatology
Mount Sinai School of Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, NY, USA New York, NY, USA
Karthik Krishnamurthy, DO
Dermatology, Jacobi Medical Center
Cosmetic Dermatology Clinic
Montefiore Medical Center
Albert Einstien College of Medicine
Bronx, NY, USA
v
Acknowledgements
and
vii
Contents
ix
x Contents
xi
xii Contributors
adolescents often experience growth retardation thyotic conditions, early recognition, therapy,
and are greatly predisposed later in life to squamous and monitoring will be required to prevent infec-
cell carcinoma in heavily scarred areas [4]. tion or fluid and electrolyte imbalance.
Emergent evaluation of a neonate with pos-
sible EB includes skin biopsy and institution of
aggressive supportive measures, including 1.4.1 Collodion Baby
excellent skin care. Fluids and electrolytes must
be closely monitored, and the temperature must The collodion infant presents at birth encased in
be kept moderate since heat can induce blister- a shiny, thickened, variably erythematous, cello-
ing. Care must be taken to minimize new blis- phane-like membrane [5]. This presentation is
ters and erosions through gentle handling and associated with several disorders, including non-
the use of nonadhesive bandages especially for bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma
the first layer of bandaging. The skin care regi- (NCIE), lamellar ichthyosis, and self-healing col-
men must promote wound healing through daily lodion baby. Less commonly encountered condi-
bathing and vigilant inspection of blisters. tions that may present with collodion membranes
A topical or systemic antimicrobial can be used include Sjögren–Larsson syndrome, Conradi–
to prevent infection, though use must be bal- Hünermann syndrome, trichothiodystrophy, and
anced by the potential for selection of resistant neonatal Gaucher’s disease [3].
microbes. Topical antibiotics may be rotated Despite the markedly thickened stratum cor-
and the use of such products should be discon- neum in collodion infants, the membrane acts as
tinued when the wound is clean [2]. Nonsteroidal a poor barrier due to cracking and fissuring. This
anti-inflammatory drugs or opiates can be results in increased water and electrolyte loss
administered to decrease pain during bandaging leading to a hypovolemic hypernatremic state,
and other procedures. Intact blisters must be heat loss, and an increased risk of developing
incised on the dependent side using a sterile cutaneous infections and sepsis. Infants are also
needle to prevent lesion extension. It is impor- at risk for developing pneumonia from aspiration
tant to properly diagnose the EB type and sub- of squamous material in utero, and have difficulty
type, as well as counsel and educate parents on closing their eyes due to the thickened skin and
prognosis and future therapy. Referral for ectropion [3].
genetic counseling is appropriate. In-hospital Treatment of an infant with a collodion mem-
care may be appropriate until the infant is feed- brane is primarily supportive. The babies should
ing well and gaining weight with stable skin be placed in a high-humidity, neutrally thermal
involvement, and the family has adequate train- environment with the application of bland emol-
ing in skin care management. lients such as petrolatum ointment to prevent
dehydration. Serum electrolytes and fluids should
be monitored. Surgical debridement is contrain-
1.4 Disorders of Keratinization dicated and the use of keratolytics in the neonatal
(Ichthyosis) period through the first 6 months of life is not
recommended due to the increased risk of toxic-
There are several ichthyotic conditions that mani- ity from excessive absorption through permeable
fest during the neonatal period as either collodion skin [5].
baby or scaling erythroderma. These disorders The management of these infants should
encompass a wide range of genetic conditions include a dermatological consultation to help
with molecular defects affecting the epidermis [3]. identify the ichthyotic disorder and tailor their
At birth and up to the first day of life, desquama- treatment. A skin biopsy evaluating the histologic
tion of the skin is abnormal and the differential appearance of lesional skin and the use of elec-
diagnosis includes congenital ichthyosis, intra- tron microscopy and/or specific genetic testing
uterine stress, and postmaturity [5]. For most ich- may confirm the etiologic diagnosis. Because
1 Neonatal and Pediatric Dermatologic Emergencies 5
involvement of the face may result in ectropion CNS disease, which represents 30% of neonatal
formation, ophthalmologic consultation is appro- HSV cases, generally presents in full-term infants
priate [5]. after 16–19 days of life [10]. Skin lesions are only
present in 60% of infants. Encephalitis can result
from retrograde neuronal spread of mucosal
1.5 Herpes Simplex Virus lesions [8]. HSV encephalitis or meningoencepha-
litis can cause irritability, lethargy, poor feeding,
HSV is a DNA virus that can cause acute skin seizures, coma, and death. Prompt initiation of
infections and serious illness in neonates and acyclovir therapy substantially improves outcome;
infants, ranking as one of the most significant prolonged therapy has been associated with better
dermatologic emergencies in the first year of life. outcomes. A significant number of neonates with
HSV-2 causes 70–85% of neonatal HSV infec- HSV-2 CNS infections may have neurologic prob-
tions, with HSV-1 associated with the remainder lems at 1 year, including developmental delay, epi-
of cases. The rate of neonatal HSV disease in the lepsy, blindness, and cognitive disabilities [10].
United States is approximately 1 per 10,000 Disseminated disease occurs in 25% of neo-
births [6], roughly 1,500 cases per year. nates, and is the most common presentation of
HSV infection of the neonate can occur during HSV in premature infants. Clinical manifesta-
the intrauterine (5%), peripartum (85%), or post- tions appear after 1–2 weeks of life. Skin or
partum (10%) periods [7]. Most neonatal HSV mucosal lesions are present in 60% of cases [8].
infections are acquired by contact with asymp- Disseminated disease commonly involves the
tomatic primary or recurrent genital HSV infec- lung, liver, and brain, resulting in shock, dissemi-
tion during delivery [8]; the risk of transmission nated intravascular coagulation, and multiple
is substantially reduced by caesarean section. organ system failure [10]. Mortality is 75% in
Transmission risk is increased by prolonged rup- untreated neonates and can be as high as 30%
ture of the membranes, as well as vacuum or for- despite treatment.
ceps delivery and placement of fetal scalp The presence of a vesicular rash in a febrile
monitors, which breach the integrity of the muco- neonate, with or without lethargy, seizures, or sys-
cutaneous barrier and may serve as an inocula- temic findings should raise suspicion for HSV
tion site for HSV. disease [9]. Early consideration and diagnosis of
HSV infections occur with three distinct clini- HSV infection allow initiation of therapy, thus
cal presentations: (1) disease limited to the skin, minimizing significant viral replication and dis-
eyes, and/or mouth (SEM disease), (2) central semination [10]. HSV infection in neonates may
nervous system (CNS) disease, with or without present as eroded or denuded skin. However, since
skin lesions, and (3) disseminated disease involv- vesicular rashes and erosions may be absent in
ing multiple visceral organs, including the lungs, HSV infection, neonates with CNS infection or
liver, adrenal glands, skin, eyes, and brain [8]. sepsis should prompt consideration of HSV.
SEM disease accounts for 45% of neonatal A complete workup should include cultures of the
HSV cases. Skin is involved in 80–85% of cases CSF, blood, mouth, nasopharynx, conjunctivae,
[8]. Isolated or grouped vesicles on an erythema- rectum, and skin vesicles. Histologic examination
tous base appear 1–2 weeks following inoculation. of scrapings from the base of a vesicle or mucosal
Within 1–3 days, vesicles progress to coalescing ulceration, for the presence of multinucleated
crusted papules and plaques. The lesions may giant cells and eosinophilic intranuclear inclu-
erode or ulcerate [9]. Systemic therapy is required; sions typical of HSV (i.e., with Tzanck test), has
otherwise, dissemination of the infection may low sensitivity. Direct fluorescence antibody
occur. With treatment, the long-term developmen- staining of vesicle scrapings allows for rapid diag-
tal outcome of SEM disease is good. Neonates nosis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay of
with SEM disease often have recurrent cutaneous CSF to detect HSV DNA is currently the diagnos-
herpes during early childhood [10]. tic method of choice for CNS disease. A complete
6 D.X. Zhang et al.
blood count and comprehensive metabolic panel, structures may be dangerous and even life-threat-
including liver transaminases, should be per- ening. Of particular concern are IHs in the perior-
formed to assess systemic involvement [8]. bital, perioral, deep subcutaneous, and perineal
High-dose parenteral acyclovir is the treat- regions. Facial and perineal hemangiomas should
ment of choice for neonatal HSV infections. raise consideration of associated structural anom-
Acyclovir (generally given as 60 mg/kg/day given alies such as the PHACES and PELVIS/SACRAL
in three divided doses over 21 days) improves syndromes, as these may be associated with
both mortality and morbidity from neonatal dis- significant medical risks.
seminated and CNS HSV. Similar dosing for a IHs found periocularly may permanently
shorter duration is recommended for SEM dis- affect vision; unless the lesion is both superficial
ease, and for asymptomatic infants born to women and small in size, an ophthalmologist should be
acquiring HSV infection near term [8, 10]. consulted. For lesions that may partially or fully
A recent multicenter observational study of neo- obstruct vision, systemic therapy is usually indi-
nates with HSV infection determined that delayed cated. The contralateral eye may be patched for
initiation of acyclovir therapy is associated with a several hours each day to promote opening of the
higher rate of in-hospital death [11]. Thus, it is affected eye. Systemic therapy, such as propra-
reasonable to consider empiric acyclovir therapy nolol or prednisone, should be instituted early
in ill neonates where HSV is being considered in by a specialist with expertise in treating IHs.
the differential diagnosis while awaiting diagnos- Occasionally, intralesional corticosteroids are
tic testing results. Pediatric infectious disease utilized for periocular lesions, although there
consultation is reasonable in established cases of have been rare reports of ipsilateral and even con-
CNS or disseminated infection [10]. Transient tralateral blindness after such procedures.
neutropenia may occur in up to 20% of neonates Perioral IHs not only risk deformation of the
treated with high-dose acyclovir, but may not lip cosmetically but may be also associated with
result in clinically significant adverse outcomes. pharyngeal or tracheal lesions, potentially caus-
ing airway obstruction and stridor. In patients
with large mandibular IHs, especially involving
1.6 Vascular Birthmarks multiple areas of the perioral, chin, and bilateral
jawline segments, imaging of the airway by direct
1.6.1 Hemangiomas visualization, CT, or MRI should be considered.
Systemic therapy should also be instituted in
Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most com- cases involving airway obstruction. In more
mon vascular tumor, affecting 4–10% of all severe cases, an otolaryngologist may utilize
infants born in the United States. IHs are benign laser or other surgically destructive techniques.
tumors that may not be present at birth, but pres- Deep IHs are more difficult to monitor, as the
ent within the first few weeks of life. Precursor exact size is less clinically discernible. CT or
lesions are common but often subtle; early signs MRI imaging can aid in determining the extent of
include pallor, telangiectases, a bruise-like involvement as well as elucidate proximity to
appearance, or, rarely, skin ulceration. IHs typi- organs and vascular structures, such as the carotid
cally proliferate, with rapid growth of the tumor artery and vein, which are at risk for compression
in the first several months of life. This phase is during the proliferative stage. Deep IHs that are
followed by an involution stage, with slow, spon- in close proximity to vascular structures need to
taneous diminishment of the lesion over several be monitored very closely during the prolifera-
years. Following involution of the vascular com- tive stage; systemic therapy should also be initi-
ponent, there is sometimes a residual fibro-fatty ated to minimize functional impact and potential
mass. deformation.
Occasionally, IHs may require emergent atten- IHs in the perineal region need special consid-
tion and therapy [12]. IHs that are near vital eration, since these lesions can affect genitouri-
1 Neonatal and Pediatric Dermatologic Emergencies 7
Fig. 1.3 Port Wine Stain. Infant with port wine stain involv-
nary and gastrointestinal functions. CT or MRI
ing the ophthalmic branch (V1) of the trigeminal nerve
imaging may be helpful in delineating the extent
of involvement, and systemic therapy may also
be required. arterial anomalies, and Renal anomalies), and
PHACE syndrome (Fig. 1.2), a constellation SACRAL syndrome are all used to refer to the simi-
of clinical findings associated with IHs, refers lar findings associated with larger IHs in the ano-
to Posterior fossa brain abnormalities, Heman- genital region. There are no published guidelines
giomas, Arterial malformations, Coarctation of regarding the appropriate threshold for performing
the aorta and other cardiac defects, and Eye imaging and workup to look for associated anoma-
abnormalities. Diagnostic criteria for PHACE lies. Further studies are needed to establish both the
syndrome and possible PHACE syndrome include size and location of perineal IHs of concern.
major and minor findings such as cerebrovas- Functionally significant or potentially deforming
cular, cardiovascular, ocular, brain, and ventral or hemangiomas warrant early referral to specialists
midline defects [13]. An IH of at least 5 cm in with expertise in workup and management.
size found on the head and neck region should
undergo a workup to rule out underlying abnor-
malities that may be life-threatening. An MRI 1.6.2 Port-Wine Stains
and MRA of the soft tissues of the head and neck,
as well as of the brain, should be performed. An PWS (Fig. 1.3) are non-palpable vascular malfor-
ECHO and EKG may identify cardiac anomalies, mations composed of capillary venules present at
and an eye exam should be performed. Despite birth, which may be isolated cutaneous findings or
their benign appearance, facial IHs may portend associated with syndromic features. PWS on the
serious underlying malformations. face, primarily involving the ophthalmic branch of
Large, segmental hemangiomas in the anogeni- the trigeminal nerve (V1), may be associated with
tal region have also been found to be associated Sturge–Weber Syndrome (SWS) [14]. SWS may
with underlying anomalies. The acronyms PELVIS manifest with seizures and developmental delay,
syndrome (Perineal hemangioma, External genita- and/or glaucoma. PWS may also be associated
lia malformations, Lipomyelomeningocele, with more complex vascular malformations.
Vesicorenal abnormalities, Imperforate anus, and Management in the neonatal period should
Skin tag), LUMBAR syndrome (Lower body include consideration of the differential diagno-
hemangioma and other cutaneous defects, sis (PWS, hemangioma, complex malformation)
Urogenital anomalies, ulceration, Myelopathy, and evaluation for possible syndromic features
Bony deformities, Anorectal malformations, that may require emergent measures. Facial PWS
8 D.X. Zhang et al.
overlying the V1 distribution require urgent Stevens–Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and toxic
evaluation for possible glaucoma [14]. Evaluations epidermolysis, acute infectious complications of
for CNS manifestations may be considered, but atopic dermatitis, and some primary infections
need not be performed as a part of emergency due to bacteria, viruses, and fungi.
management.
to oral therapy with twice-daily dosing of second- sary. Oral antihistamines such as diphenhydramine,
generation antihistamines such as cetirizine, lor- cetirizine, or hydroxyzine, bland emollients, or topi-
atadine, levocetirizine, or fexofenadine [16]. cal corticosteroids may be administered for pruritus
These agents should be tapered over several weeks [16]. After 1–2 weeks, the eruption usually desqua-
after the urticaria resolves. Severe outbreaks or mates leaving a temporary hyperpigmentation.
pruritus can be treated with first-generation anti-
histamines such as hydroxyzine or diphenhy-
dramine, doxepin, or even H2 blockers such as
ranitidine or cimetidine. Oral corticosteroids 1.9.3 Serum Sickness-Like Reaction
should be reserved for nonresponsive cases in
order to avoid potential side effects and rebound. SSLR is characterized by fever, an urticaria-like
Epinephrine can be used for anaphylaxis and an eruption, and arthralgias that occur 1–3 weeks
epinephrine pen should be considered in patients after a drug exposure. The eruption can be fixed
at risk for severe allergic responses. and may become purpuric. Unlike true serum
sickness, this type of eruption is not associated
with immune complexes, vasculitis, hypocom-
1.9.2 Exanthematous Reaction plementemia, or renal involvement.
Cephalosporins, penicillins, minocycline, sul-
Exanthematous or morbilliform drug reactions fonamides, and bupropion are the main causes,
are the most common type of drug eruptions. with cefaclor being the most common [15]. The
Classic findings are pruritic, pink macules, or differential diagnosis includes viral or drug exan-
papules coalescing into patches or plaques begin- thems, rheumatoid arthritis, urticarial vasculitis,
ning at 1–2 weeks after starting a medication. urticaria, drug vasculitis, and post-viral synovitis.
The eruption is symmetric and usually appears Management includes discontinuing the
on the trunk before generalized dissemination. offending medication; antihistamines and topical
A coexisting viral infection can increase the inci- corticosteroids can be administered for pruritus.
dence and severity of a morbilliform reaction as If fever or arthralgias are severe, a short course of
seen when amoxicillin is prescribed during an oral corticosteroids (1–2 mg/kg/day) may be
Epstein–Barr Virus infection. prescribed. Since cefaclor rarely cross-reacts
Penicillins, sulfonamides, cephalosporins, and with other beta-lactam antibiotics, other cepha-
anticonvulsants are common causes of exan- losporins are usually tolerated.
thematous reactions [16]. The differential diag-
nosis includes viral exanthems, pityriasis rosea,
acute graft versus host disease, allergic contact 1.9.4 Fixed Drug Eruption
dermatitis, scarlet fever, and eczema. In contrast
to viral exanthems, a drug exanthem is more A fixed drug eruption is characterized by a few
likely to be pruritic. well-circumscribed, oval, erythematous, or
Usually, the diagnosis is made on clinical hyperpigmented plaques that recur at the same
grounds. Occasionally, a skin biopsy may be sites with repeat drug administration. Lesions
helpful, especially in differentiating from other favor the lips, extremities, upper trunk, and
conditions, such as graft versus host disease. It is genitalia. The eruption occurs 1–2 weeks after
important to assess if drug reactions are isolated drug exposure and tends to be asymptomatic.
to the skin, or affect other organ systems, as Barbiturates, sulfonamides, acetaminophen, ibu-
occurs with Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and profen, aspirin, tetracyclines, pseudoephedrine,
Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, which lamotrigine, and phenolphthalein are the typical
affects hematologic, lymphatic, hepatic, renal, triggers [16]. The differential diagnosis includes
and pulmonary systems. The offending drug arthropod bites, contact dermatitis, eczema,
should be discontinued if not completely neces- cellulitis, urticaria, and erythema multiforme.
10 D.X. Zhang et al.
Mortality estimates for SJS and TEN are as may be useful. Topical corticosteroids and anti-
high as 1–5% and 25–35%, respectively [17]. histamines can be prescribed for pruritus.
Withdrawing the offending drug is essential. If Symptoms and labs may initially improve and
epidermal detachment is extensive, patients then flare after a few weeks. Thyroid testing
should be transferred to an ICU or burn unit to should be repeated 2–3 months after treatment to
optimize wound care, prevent infections, and test for autoimmune thyroiditis, even if the results
attend to hydration and nutrition. Ophthalmology are normal at baseline.
should be consulted for ocular involvement. The
administration of systemic corticosteroids is con-
troversial and is advocated by some for treatment 1.10 Selected Pediatric Systemic
during the first few days of the eruption. A longer Diseases
course may increase morbidity due to increased
risk of infections. Furthermore, IVIG (2.5–3 mg/ 1.10.1 Juvenile Dermatomyositis
kg/day) over 3–5 days has been advocated as
another treatment option. Additionally, there Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JD), a humoral and
have been reports of improvement with cellular immune-mediated chronic inflammatory
cyclosporine, plasmapheresis, and cyclophosph- condition characterized by generalized capillary
amide. Of importance, aromatic anticonvulsants vasculopathy, results in a pronounced erythema-
(phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine) tous rash of the face or extremities and symmetri-
may cross-react and should not be substituted for cal muscle weakness. JD has an incidence of 3
one another. per million children per year [2]. Specific HLA
and cytokine polymorphisms, as well as environ-
mental triggers such as group A hemolytic strep-
1.9.7 Drug Rash with Eosinophilia tococci and other microbial infections have been
and Systemic Symptoms implicated in disease pathogenesis. JD should be
considered when a child presents with character-
DRESS is a life-threatening condition that devel- istic rashes (a violaceous rash of the periocular
ops 1–8 weeks after drug exposure. Patients usu- area, pink-red papules of the dorsal fingers,
ally present with a morbilliform eruption, as well photosensitive dermatitis) and two or more of the
as edema, cervical lymphadenopathy, fever, and following: progressive symmetrical proximal
internal organ involvement (hepatitis, pneumoni- muscle weakness, inflammatory and atrophic
tis, interstitial nephritis, encephalitis, myocardi- muscle histopathology, elevated muscle-derived
tis, and thyroiditis). Drugs implicated in DRESS enzymes, and EMG changes or MRI appearance
include aromatic anticonvulsants, dapsone, of inflammatory myopathy. Fifty percent of
allopurinol, minocycline, sulfonamides, lam- patients report a progressive onset characterized
otrigine, and terbinafine. Furthermore, the differ- by weakness, anorexia, malaise, abdominal pain,
ential diagnosis consists of bacterial or viral and a violaceous rash that precedes or follows
infections, lymphoma, and idiopathic hypereo- muscle weakness. Thirty percent have fulminant
sinophilic syndrome. A new rash associated with onset of fever, weakness, and multisystem
unexplained eosinophilia, atypical lymphocyto- involvement [3].
sis, and elevated transaminases may be indicative Cutaneous signs include photosensitive skin
of DRESS. Hepatic transaminases, a CBC, uri- changes of the hands and knuckles, “Gottron’s
nalysis, serum creatinine, and thyroid testing sign,” cutaneous ulceration at pressure points,
should be ordered at baseline and followed. heliotrope rash of the face, periungal changes
A skin biopsy is usually nonspecific. (telangiectasia, cuticular overgrowth), and less
Management includes immediate removal of commonly calcinosis. Nondestructive, nonde-
the offending drug. In cases of visceral involve- forming arthritis of the knee can occur in parallel
ment, systemic corticosteroids (1–2 mg/kg/day) with proximal muscle weakness, resulting in an
12 D.X. Zhang et al.
inability to rise from the floor. Currently, there than skin usually involves joints, the gastrointes-
has been no association with malignancy in chil- tinal tract, and/or kidneys. Skin lesions can begin
dren; however, myositis and muscle weakness as urticarial macules or papules that may become
can result in decreased esophageal motility, reflux purpuric, bullous, or necrotic. Although 80%
with ulceration or aspiration pneumonia, and of cases have joint and skin involvement, in 25% of
decreased respiratory capacity. Vasculitis of mes- cases, non-migratory oligoarthritis may be the
enteric vessels, the retina and eyelid, and renal only presenting sign [3]. Gastrointestinal symp-
ischemia leading to renal failure are further com- toms range from colicky abdominal pain and
plications that must be considered [4]. positive fecal occult blood to serious complica-
Prompt evaluation by a specialist is warranted, tions such as intussusception, acute pancreatitis,
as earlier diagnosis and initiation of therapy may bowel perforation, and protein-losing enteropa-
improve overall prognosis. Workup may include thy. Renal complications include transient micro-
CBC, CPK, LDH, Aldolase, antibody screens, scopic hematuria, proteinuria, gross hematuria,
and MRI. nephrotic syndrome, acute nephritis, and, in the
First-line treatment includes high-dose oral long-term, end-stage renal disease; however, most
corticosteroid therapy (1–2 mg/kg/day) or intra- renal cases have excellent prognosis with com-
venous methylprednisone (3-day pulses of 30 mg/ plete resolution. In rare cases, neurological symp-
kg) when there is multisystem involvement. toms such as headache, intracerebral bleeds, and
Methotrexate can be administered as second-line seizures have been reported.
therapy, and has been shown to improve muscu- Often the diagnosis is straightforward in chil-
lar strength as well as other signs of disease activ- dren presenting with purpura of the buttocks
ity; evolving use of biologics should be and lower extremities, and with other associated
considered. Patients should be counseled in sun systemic findings [4]. A differential diagnosis
protection and referred to physiotherapy follow- of hypersensitivity vasculitis can be excluded by
ing resolution of the acute phase of the disease. a careful diagnostic workup including patient
history detailing recent infections and medica-
tions, and relevant laboratory investigations,
1.10.2 Henoch–Schönlein Purpura including metabolic panels, blood cell counts,
coagulation studies, radiographic studies, stool
Henoch–Schönlein Purpura (HSP), an acute non- guaiac testing, urinalysis, abdominal ultrasonog-
granulomatous vasculitis of small blood vessels, raphy for GI symptoms, and kidney biopsy
is the most common childhood vasculitis [2]. with IgA immunofluorescence. A skin biopsy
HSP affects predominantly male children aged with IgA immunofluorescence is unnecessary
two and older, and is characterized by the differ- unless the child presents with atypical symp-
ential regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory toms such as hemorrhagic bullous purpura.
cytokines in response to IgA immune complex Treatment includes supportive hydration, bed
deposition. Although several HLA alleles have rest, and symptomatic pain relief such as non-
been linked to this disease, in more than half the steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for joint pain.
cases, HSP is preceded by upper respiratory tract Systematic corticosteroids may be administered
infections of viral or bacterial nature. for severe GI, joint, and renal complications, as
Noninfectious triggers include antibiotics, non- well as hemorrhagic bullous purpura, but may
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, vaccinations, not prevent long-term renal impairment. Most
immune response modifiers, and insect bites. cases of HSP resolve spontaneously within 4
HSP usually presents with characteristic non- weeks; however, patients must be educated
blanching palpable purpura or petechiae due to regarding recurrent attacks. Furthermore, patients
edema and extravasation of erythrocytes, with with renal abnormalities require laboratory
lower leg predominance. Organ involvement other monitoring and subsequent follow-up.
1 Neonatal and Pediatric Dermatologic Emergencies 13
with bullous desquamation of large sheets of monly isolated organism in children with
skin. At this stage, the epidermis may separate necrotizing fasciitis [22]. Pediatric risk factors
upon gentle shear force (Nikolsky’s sign) result- include chronic illness, trauma, surgery, and
ing in a scalded appearance. Mucous membranes recent infection with varicella [23].
are spared, distinguishing SSSS from toxic epi- Necrotizing fasciitis commonly presents with
dermal necrolysis. localized pain and erythema [22]. Within hours to
Cultures of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, days the infection can progress to a large area of
nasopharynx, umbilicus, etc. should be obtained necrosis, ulceration, and bullae, as well as septic
to identify the primary infection site [3]. However, shock [3]. Imaging studies may aid in the diagno-
skin cultures are classically negative, since cuta- sis of necrotizing fasciitis. However, imaging
neous findings are due to a systemic toxin, not should not delay surgical inspection to identify
local infection. Histopathological examination of and debride deep soft tissue infection, as well as
a biopsy of the roof of a blister demonstrating to obtain surgical specimens for Gram culture
intraepidermal acantholysis within the stratum and stain. Delay in surgical debridement is a
granulosum confirms the diagnosis. significant modifiable contributor to increased
In older literature, childhood mortality was mortality. Currently, pediatric mortality rates are
cited as approximately 11% and usually occurred as high as 5.4% [22].
in conjunction with extensive exfoliation, over- If necrotizing fasciitis is suspected, immediate
whelming sepsis and the resulting electrolyte management should be in an intensive care set-
imbalance [20]. Improved recognition and diag- ting involving surgical consultation, antibiotic
nosis have markedly decreased mortality. coverage, and fluid resuscitation. The priority is
Treatment with intravenous antibiotics, such as a early surgical debridement to remove all affected,
beta-lactamase-resistant anti-staphylococcal anti- necrotic tissue. GAS infections should be treated
biotics or, if MRSA is suspected, vancomycin, is with intravenous penicillin and clindamycin
appropriate. Alternatively, clindamycin may be while treatment for non-GAS infections should
prescribed if the Staphylococcus aureus strain is include intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics
found to be susceptible to this agent. Management with aerobic, anaerobic, and MRSA coverage.
also consists of analgesia, sterile dressings, tem-
perature regulation, and fluid replacement. The
skin usually heals without scarring. 1.12.3 Herpes Simplex Virus
12. Maguiness SM, Frieden IJ. Management of difficult Skin Syndrome in Germany. J Investig Dermatol.
infantile haemangiomas. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97: 2005;124(4):700–3.
266–71. 21. Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Rieg G, et al.
13. Metry D, Heyer G, Hess C, et al. Consensus statement Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated
on diagnostic criteria for PHACE syndrom. Pediatrics. methicillin-resitant staphylococcus aureus in Los
2009;124:1447–56. Angeles. New England Joural of Medicine.
14. Melancon JM, Dohil MA, Eichenfield LF. Facial port- 2005;352(14):1445–53.
wine stain: when to worry? Pediatr Dermatol. 22. Eneli I, Davies HD. Epidemiology and outcome of
2012;29:131–3. necrotizing fasciitis in children: an active surveillance
15. Hook KP, Eichenfield LF. Approach to the neonate study of the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance
with ecchymoses and crusts. Dermatol Ther. Program. J Pediatr. 2007;151:79–84.
2011;24:240–8. 23. Laupland KB, Davies HD, Low DE, Schwartz B,
16. Lansang P, Wienstein M, Shear N. Drug reactions. In: Green K, McGeer A. Invasive group A streptococcal
Shahner LA, Hanson RC, editors. Pediatric disease in children and association with varicella-
Dermatology. 4th ed. China: Elsevier; 2011. p. zoster virus infection. Pediatrics. 2000;105(5):e60.
1698–711. 24. Nasser M, Fedorowicz Z, Khoshnevisan MH, Shahiri
17. Levi N, Bastuji-Garin S, Mockenhaupt M, et al. Tabarestani M. Acyclovir for treating primary her-
Medications as risk factors of Stevens-Johnson syn- petic gingivostomatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
drome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in children: a 2008;(4):CD006700.
pooled analysis. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e297–304. 25. Hacimustafaoglu M, Celebi S. Candida infections in
18. Kushner HI, Bastian JF, Turner CL, Burns JC. The non-neutropenic children after the neonatal period.
two emergencies of Kawasaki syndrome and the Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9(10):923–40.
implications for the developing world. Pediatr Infect 26. Katragkou A, Roilides E. Best practice in treating
Dis J. 2008;27:377–83. infants and children with proven, probable or sus-
19. Hoeger PH, Elsner P. Staphylococcal scalded skin pected invasive fungal infections. Curr Opin Infect
syndrome: transmission of exfoliatin-producing Dis. 2011;24(3):225–9.
Staphylococcus aureus by an asymptomatic carrier. 27. Burgos A, Zaoutis TE, Dvorak CC, et al. Pediatric
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1988;7:340–2. invasive aspergillosis: a multicenter retrospective
20. Mockenhaupt M, Idzko M, Grosber M, Schopf E, analysis of 139 contemporary cases. Pediatrics.
Norgauer J. Epidemiology of Staphylococcal Scalded 2008;121(5):e1286–94.
Infectious Emergencies
in Dermatology 2
Emily Stamell and Karthik Krishnamurthy
of “dishwater,” or murky, grayish, fluid, severe sep- pain, rapidly spreading tense edema, hemor-
sis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, or rhagic bullae formation, gray-blue discoloration,
multiorgan failure can develop [2]. The infection and foul-smelling discharge [5].
rapidly evolves over hours or days. The mainstay of effective treatment is exten-
The pathognomonic finding of crepitus and sive surgical debridement in conjunction with
soft tissue air on plain radiograph is only seen in broad-spectrum antibiotics. Gram stain can guide
37% and 57% of patients, respectively. Crepitus appropriate antimicrobial therapy, but should not
results from anaerobic tissue metabolism, which be delayed while awaiting results. Initial ther-
produces hydrogen and nitrogen, insoluble apy should include a b-lactam/b-lactamase inhib-
gases, that accumulate in the subcutaneous tis- itor combined with broad-spectrum coverage
sues. Other common laboratory findings include against Gram-negative bacilli, Staphylococci,
elevated white cell count, increased concentra- Streptococci, and anaerobes. Antibiotics can be
tions of serum glucose, urea, and creatinine, tailored depending on the isolated organism(s).
hypoalbuminemia, acidosis, and altered coagu- Table 2.1 outlines the antimicrobial algorithm for
lation profile [4]. However, given the nonspecific necrotizing fasciitis [3]. Hyperbaric oxygen has
nature of these studies, the diagnosis is clinical. been postulated to decrease the number of debri-
Clinical signs that favor necrotizing fasciitis dements and mortality; however, no large study
over cellulitis include presence of cutaneous has confirmed this theory [6]. Intravenous immu-
anesthesia as it suggests a deeper component to noglobulin (IVIG) has been used as an adjuvant
the infection affecting sensory nerves, severe therapy primarily in patients with GAS necrotizing
2 Infectious Emergencies in Dermatology 21
fasciitis. Studies have showed varying success, S. aureus or GAS, whereas preseptal cellulitis
and it should not replace the gold standard of due to primary bacteremia is usually due to
debridement and antimicrobial therapy [7, 8]. Streptococcus pneumoniae. Orbital cellulitis may
Mortality rates range from 20 to 40% [5]. One be polymicrobial and is caused by pathogens
retrospective study identified eight independent responsible for sinusitis, including S. pneumo-
predictors of mortality for necrotizing fasciitis: niae, non-typable Haemophilus influenzae,
liver cirrhosis, soft tissue air, Aeromonas infec- Moraxella catarrhalis, GAS, S. aureus, and/or
tion, a gram-negative facultative anaerobic rod, anaerobes [10].
age over 60 years, band polymorphonuclear neu- Consultation with ophthalmology and otolar-
trophils greater than 10%, activated partial thro- yngology should be obtained immediately with
moplastin time of greater than 60 s, and serum concomitant initiation of antimicrobials against
creatinine greater than 2 mg/dL [9]. the common pathogens. Preseptal cellulitis is man-
aged with oral antibiotics whereas orbital cellulitis
requires intravenous antimicrobials. Surgical inter-
2.2.2 Preseptal and Orbital Cellulitis vention, such as abscess drainage, has a role in the
management of patients with orbital cellulitis. A
Bacterial infections involving the orbit poten- recent national perspective study found that older
tially cause severe damage to the eye, cavernous patients, those with diplopia, and hospital admis-
sinus thrombosis, and death. Preseptal cellulitis sion via the emergency room were predictors of
is an infection of the eyelids and surrounding surgery [12]. With prompt initiation of antimi-
skin anterior to the orbital septum whereas orbital crobials, prognosis is very good. When treatment
cellulitis is an infection posterior to the septum. is inadequate or delayed, however, complications
Preseptal cellulitis is usually secondary to trauma include blindness, cranial nerve palsies, brain
or bacteremia and the average age of patients is abscesses, and death [13].
21 months of age. On the other hand, orbital (also
known as post-septal) cellulitis is a complication
of sinusitis, with average incident age of 12 years 2.2.3 Malignant Otitis Externa
[10]. It is imperative to distinguish orbital celluli-
tis from preseptal cellulitis as the former is a Malignant otitis externa is a severe form of otitis
more severe infection, threatening permanent externa most commonly seen in elderly diabetic
vision damage, requiring hospitalization, and patients. Patients often report failure of local
intravenous antibiotics [3]. therapy. Clinically, they have severe tenderness
Clinical signs can be useful in characterizing around the auricle, persistent drainage, and gran-
preseptal and orbital cellulitis. Patients with ulation tissue at the junction of the osseous and
either form of cellulitis complain of pain, con- cartilaginous portions of the external ear canal.
junctivitis, epiphora (insufficient tear film drain- Almost all cases are due to P. aeruginosa and
age from the eyes), and blurred vision. Physical antimicrobial treatment should be directed against
exam will reveal periorbital erythema and edema. this pathogen. While the treatment of choice was
However, patients with orbital cellulitis may also previously oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg twice daily
display ophthalmoplegia, pain on eye motion, with or without rifampin, as mentioned previ-
proptosis, vision loss, abnormal papillary reflexes, ously, increasing pseudomonal resistance to
and/or disk edema [10]. If clinical evaluation is fluoroquinolones now necessitates hospitaliza-
unequivocal, computed tomography (CT) with tion and intravenous antibiotics with a third-gen-
intravenous contrast can distinguish the two con- eration cephalosporin, such as ceftazidime 2 g
ditions [11]. every 8 h. Complications include osteomyelitis
The pathogenesis of the infection usually dic- of the skull, nerve palsies, mastoiditis, sepsis,
tates the causative organism. The pathogen in sigmoid sinus thrombosis, and a mortality rate of
preseptal cellulitis due to trauma is most likely around 20% [5, 14].
22 E. Stamell and K. Krishnamurthy
2.2.4 Meningococcemia
endothelial cells, subsequently causing vasculi- diagnosis is rendered as treatment with doxycy-
tis, hypoperfusion, and end-organ damage. In the cline 100 mg twice daily for adults or 2.2 mg/kg
United States, the vector is the American dog twice daily for children under 45 kg for 7–14 days
tick, Dermacentor variabilis, and the Rocky should not be delayed for diagnostic confirmation
Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni [21]. Chloramphenicol 50 mg/kg is an alternative
[22]. RMSF has been reported in the United treatment for patients younger than 9 years of age
States, Western Canada, Western and Central or pregnant women [18]. Of 100 individuals
Mexico, Panama, Costa Rica, Northwestern infected, 5–10 of those will die and many others
Argentina, Brazil, and Colombia. In the United will suffer amputation, deafness, or permanent
States, RMSF has occurred in every state except learning disability from hypoperfusion [22]. As
for Vermont and Maine, with half the cases found there are no current vaccines to prevent rickettsial
in Oklahoma, Tennessee, Arkansas, Maryland, diseases, preventative measures have been empha-
Virginia, and the Carolinas [23]. Up to 1,200 sized. General recommendations for prevention
cases annually have been reported in the United of RMSF include avoidance of tick habitats,
States, but there are likely a number of unreported implementation of personal protective measures
cases each year [24]. The highest incidence of to limit possibility of tick exposure, frequent
disease has been seen in children less than 10 examination of oneself to identify any attached
years of age and adults between 40 and 64 years ticks, and proper removal of attached ticks to
old as well as men and Caucasians [23]. reduce transmission [23, 26]. A minimum of
The diagnosis is primarily clinical. The triad 4–6-h period of attachment is required for
of fever, headache, and rash in an individual with transmission of R. rickettsii. Therefore, early and
the history of a tick bite or exposure to ticks proper removal techniques are emphasized to
should raise suspicion for RMSF; however, this is decrease the risk of transmission. These include
only seen in 3% of patients with RMSF [25]. wearing protective gloves, grasping the tick with
Fever often accompanied by headache and myal- fine forceps close to the point of attachment and
gia precedes the rash by 3–6 days. Other early pulling straight outward, avoiding jerking, twist-
symptoms include nausea, vomiting, and abdom- ing, or squeezing the tick, and disinfecting the
inal pain. The patient may eventually develop bite wound after tick removal [27]. Both the use
hypotension, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal of Tick repellent (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide,
failure followed by hypotensive shock and acute DEET) on exposed skin and application of an aca-
respiratory failure. The rash begins as small mac- ricide (e.g.,disease is caused permethrin) on cloth-
ules around the wrists and ankles, eventually ing can be helpful [23, 28].
involving the majority of the body, but spares the
face. Red-pink macules and papules are seen on
the palms and soles later in the course of disease. 2.2.6 Lyme Disease
Petechiae develop within the macules or papules
due to severe vascular injury. The petechiae even- Lyme disease, also known as Lyme borreliosis, is
tually evolve to cutaneous necrosis [5, 19, 21]. the most common tick-borne infectious disease
Definitive diagnosis can be made by in North America [29]. The disease is caused by
immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry in the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato
a biopsy specimen of an eschar, macule, papule, complex and is transmitted by Ixodes ticks. In the
or petechial lesion. Serologic diagnosis cannot be United States, Lyme borreliosis is caused
utilized at the time of diagnosis as antibodies do not specifically by B. burgdorferi sensu stricto and
develop until at least 7 days after the onset of the Ixodes scapularis serves as the primary vector.
illness. Acute and convalescent-phase serum sam- Small mammals, such as white-footed mouse,
ples can be used for indirect immunofluorescence, white-tailed deer, and raccoons, and are the reser-
latex agglutination, and enzyme immunoassay to voir for the disease. Lyme disease is transmitted
detect anti-rickettsial antibodies. Often a clinical through the saliva of the Ixodes ticks, and a
24 E. Stamell and K. Krishnamurthy
feeding period of more than 36 h is usually IgM and IgG immunoblots are performed. Of
required for transmission [30]. Disease transmission note, IgG levels are positive after at least 4 weeks
is most common between June and August [29]. of symptoms [36].
Erythema migrans is the most common clini- Treatment is required to prevent disseminated
cal manifestation of localized disease and has disease and the development of delayed compli-
been seen in as many as 89% of patients in one cations. A single dose of doxycycline 200 mg
case series [31]. Clinically, an expanding red orally can be administered within 72 h of removal
annular patch with or without central clearing is of an Ixodes scapularis as a chemoprophylactic
appreciated at the site of the tick bite. Borrelial measure except to children less than 8 years of
lymphocytoma, a painless bluish-red nodule or age and pregnant women [39]. Doxycycline
plaque usually on the ear lobe, ear helix, nipple, 100 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 500 mg twice
or scrotum, is a rare cutaneous lesion that also daily are both indicated in the treatment of Lyme
occurs at the site of a tick bite during the early disease. Cefuroxime axetil 500 mg twice daily is
disseminated stage of Lyme disease. Early dis- considered second line due to cost and intrave-
seminated disease is characterized by one of the nous penicillin is now limited to cases with neu-
following: two or more erythema migrans lesions, rologic involvement. The length of treatment
Lyme neuroborreliosis (meningo-radiculitis, varies based on the clinical manifestations of the
meningitis, or peripheral facial palsy), or Lyme disease. A 14-day course of antibiotics is indi-
carditis (acute onset of atrioventricular conduc- cated in patients with neurologic involvement or
tion delays, rhythm disturbances, myocarditis, or borrelial lymphocytoma. A 28-day course of
pericarditis). Late Lyme disease manifests as antibiotics, on the other hand, is required in
arthritis, which is characterized by recurrent patients with late neuroborreliosis, recurrent
attacks or persistent swelling in one or more large arthritis after one course of oral treatment, and
joints, or acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans [29, 37].
(chronic erythematous plaques on the extensor Prevention of infection is vital in decreasing
surfaces of the extremities, which eventually the incidence of infections and the development
become atrophic) [32]. Late Lyme neuroborrelio- of late complications. Repellents are the most
sis is uncommon and presents as slowly progress- effective modality to prevent tick attachment, and
ing encephalomyelitis [33]. the most frequent agent used is DEET [38].
Diagnosis of Lyme disease can be made clini- Repellents combined with protective clothing
cally by the presence of erythema migrans as have been shown to reduce the incidence of Lyme
serologic studies early in the disease are gener- disease infections [40]. Permethrin can be applied
ally negative [29]. Serologic evaluation is pur- to clothing, shoes, bed nets, or other outdoor
sued in patients without erythema migrans. equipment, but has limited utility as a topical
Samples are first screened with an enzyme-linked agent [38]. If a tick is found attached to an indi-
immunosorbent assay (ELISA). IgM antibodies vidual, care should be taken to remove the tick
appear 2–6 weeks after exposure and IgG titers appropriately. Both the World Health Organization
can be detected 3–4 weeks thereafter [34]. The and the CDC recommend using fine-tipped for-
utility of the ELISA varies depending on disease ceps to grasp the tick closest to the point of entry
prevalence. The positive predictive value is much to the skin, and the body of the tick should not be
lower, ranging from 8 to 28% depending on the compressed [34].
sensitivity and specificity, in a region with low
prevalence of disease whereas the positive pre-
dictive value is as high as 83% in a region with a 2.2.7 Anthrax
high prevalence of disease. The false negative
rate is low for the ELISA with the negative pre- Anthrax is caused by Bacillus anthracis, an aerobic
dictive value of the test ranging from 95 to 99% Gram-positive rod, and results in three different
[35]. If the ELISA is positive or equivocal, then clinical syndromes depending on the mode of
2 Infectious Emergencies in Dermatology 25
transmission: cutaneous anthrax via inoculation, systemic complications. However, in the other
pulmonary anthrax via inhalation, and gastroin- 10% of cases, edema of the head and neck result-
testinal anthrax via ingestion. B. anthracis pro- ing in respiratory compromise or toxic shock
duces three polypeptides that comprise anthrax from overwhelming septicemia can occur [45].
toxin: protective antigen (PA), lethal factor (LF, a Diagnosis of anthrax must be confirmed with
protease), and edema factor (EF, an adenyl serology or polymerase chain reaction assay via
cyclase). The PA binds to cellular receptors, is the CDC; however, these tests can take several
cleaved by cellular furin, oligomerizes, and trans- days. Treatment should not be delayed for
ports LF and EF into cells. Edema toxin (ET, the confirmation. In uncomplicated cases of cutaneous
combination of PA and EF) is a calcium- and anthrax, oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily or
calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase that doxycycline 100 mg twice daily is indicated for
increases the intracellular level of cyclic AMP adults. For children, oral ciprofloxacin 10–15 mg/
(cAMP), and ultimately leads to impaired water kg twice daily, not to exceed 1 g/d, or doxycycline
homeostasis and cellular edema. Lethal toxin 100 mg twice daily should be used. The CDC
(LT, the combination of PA and LF) is a zinc- currently advocates for a 60-day course of antibi-
dependent endoprotease. It cleaves the N-terminus otics given increased likelihood of reexposure.
of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases Intravenous ciprofloxacin 400 mg every 12 h or
(MAPKK) and thus inhibits the MAPKKs. As such, doxycycline 100 mg every 12 h are indicated for
lethal toxin promotes macrophage apoptosis and complicated cases of cutaneous anthrax [3]. The
release of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a) mortality rate in untreated cutaneous anthrax is
and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1b) [41]. ET and LT as high as 20%. However, with appropriate treat-
are responsible for the clinical symptoms of ment, the mortality rate is less than 1% [46].
anthrax infection.
In cutaneous anthrax, the most common form,
spores gain access to the skin via trauma and ger- 2.2.8 Tularemia
minate within macrophages locally. The result is
edema and necrosis from toxins and a Tularemia, a bacterial infection caused by
hyperinflammatory response. Although the Francisella tularenis, a Gram-negative, nonmo-
majority of cases remain localized, up to 10% of tile coccobacillus, can present as six distinct syn-
untreated cutaneous anthrax may disseminate. In dromes according to the mode of transmission
this situation, macrophages carry the spores to and clinical presentation: ulceroglandular, glan-
regional lymph nodes where they germinate and dular, oculoglandular, oropharyngeal/gastroin-
the bacteria rapidly multiply. It subsequently dis- testinal, typhoidal/septicemic, and pneumonic
seminates through the blood, causing hemor- [5]. Tularemia is an arthropod-borne disease and
rhagic lymphadenitis and possible death from is transmitted by the ticks, Amblyomma america-
septicemia and toxemia [42]. num (lone-start tick), Dermacenter andersoni
Cutaneous anthrax starts as a painless pru- (Rocky Mountain wood tick), and Dermacenter
ritic papule approximately 1–12 days after inoc- variabilis (American dog tick) as well as the
ulation. The papule enlarges and develops a deerfly, Chrysops discalis. F. tularensis can also
central vesicle or bulla with surrounding edema be transmitted by handling infected mammals,
within 48 h. The vesicle becomes hemorrhagic such as rabbits, muskrats, prairie dogs, and other
with the subsequent development of necrosis rodents, or by contaminated food or water [47].
and ulceration. The classic black eschar (thick Ulceroglandular tularemia is the most com-
crust) develops over the ulcer with edema and mon type and accounts for 80% of cases of tula-
erythema remaining a prominent feature [43]. remia. A painful erythematous papule develops
Associated symptoms include fever, headache, at the inoculation site and can be solitary or mul-
malaise, and regional lymphadenopathy [44]. In tiple depending on the mode of transmission. The
90% of cases, the eschar disengages and heals papule(s) develop first into a pustule and then a
without scarring over 1–2 weeks without punched-out ulcer with raised ragged edges and a
26 E. Stamell and K. Krishnamurthy
gray-to-red necrotic base [48]. A necrotic eschar 2.2.9 Staphyloccocal Scalded Skin
is seen at the site of the ulcer and tender regional Syndrome
lymphadenopathy follows. In contrast to cutane-
ous anthrax, the eschar heals with scarring after Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS),
several weeks to months [48]. Sudden onset of also known as Ritter’s disease or pemphigus
flu-like symptoms develops on average 4–5 days neonatorum, is caused by S. aureus exfoliative
after inoculation. Hematogenous spread to the (also known as epidermolytic) toxins (ETs), pri-
spleen, liver, lungs, kidneys, intestine, central marily A and B. The toxins are directed against
nervous system, and skeletal muscles can occur desmoglein-1, a desmosomal adhesion molecule,
[47]. Tularemids, or secondary eruptions, may which causes an intraepidermal split through the
occur following hematogenous dissemination granular layer [51]. As a toxin-mediated disease,
and presents as macular, morbilliform, nodular, the bacterial infection usually lies at a distant
acneiform, papulovesicular, or plaque-like erup- focus, most commonly the conjunctiva, nasophar-
tions [48]. ynx, ear, urinary tract, or skin, and no organism
Oculoglandular tularemia occurs in less than is recovered from lesional skin, yielding nega-
1% of cases of tularemia and can present with tive tissue cultures [18]. SSSS primarily affects
conjunctivitis, periorbital edema and erythema, children and rarely adults with renal disease, as
lymphadenopathy, and lymphadenitis [49]. The the exfoliative toxins are excreted by the kid-
other forms of tularemia do not present with cuta- neys, or immunocompromise [19, 52, 53].
neous findings. The initial signs of SSSS are abrupt onset of
Diagnosis is made by fluorescent antibody fever, skin tenderness, and toxic erythema. The
testing. First-line treatment is streptomycin 1 g erythema first appears on the head and general-
intramuscularly every 12 h for 10 days, but intra- izes in 48 h, but sparing the palms, sole, and
venous gentamicin 1.5–2 mg/kg loading dose fol- mucous membranes. Flaccid bullae may develop,
lowed by 1–1.7 mg/kg every 8 h or 5–7 mg/kg and the Nikolsky sign is positive [19]. Within 1–2
every 24 h, ciprofloxacin 500–750 mg twice a days, the skin sloughs, usually starting in the
day for 10 days, or levofloxacin 500 mg daily for flexural areas. Scaling and desquamation occur
14 days have also proven efficacious in the treat- for the next 3–5 days, and re-epithelialization is
ment of tularemia. Doxycycline 100 mg oral or seen 10–14 days after the initial signs [5]
intravenous for 14–21 days has also demonstrated (Fig. 2.2). Of note, the absence of mucosal
efficacy, but is associated with higher risk of involvement is helpful in clinical differentiation
relapse [5, 50]. of SSSS from Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and
toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), as desmog- desquamation does not occur until 10–21 days
lein-1 is not expressed in mucosal epithelium. In after the onset of disease [54]. In contrast, the
addition, the diagnosis can be distinguished from desquamation in TEN is full thickness and
TEN by histologic examination of the roof of a occurs hours to days from the first signs of the
blister, as TEN shows full thickness epidermal disease [5]. The source of infection in staphylo-
necrosis, whereas SSSS only affects the upper coccal TSS is not always clear and is not identified
layers of the epidermis. in a large number of patients. S. aureus is rarely
Both immediate initiation of appropriate cultured from the blood, but instead is found in
antimicrobials and supportive care are crucial the focus of infection if one is identified. In
[19]. Antimicrobial regimens for SSSS include contrast to staphylococcal TSS, which occurs
dicloxacillin 2 g every 6 h or cefazolin 1 g every in the setting of menstruation or nosocomial
8 h. If MRSA is suspected, then vancomycin infections, streptococcal TSS usually arises
1 g every 12 h, with doses adjusted based on from deep invasive soft-tissue infections [57].
creatinine clearance and vancomycin troughs, The illness is similar, although more than 60%
is indicated [54]. Prognosis is good in children, of cases have positive blood cultures and the
but mortality in adults approaches 50%. In source of infection is usually easy to identify
adults with underlying disease, mortality is [57, 61]. In addition, mortality rate is much
almost 100% [55]. higher in streptococcal TSS [62].
Supportive management, source control, and
appropriate antimicrobial coverage are the most
2.2.10 Toxic Shock Syndrome important immediate steps in treatment. However,
it is important to recognize that treatment must
Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) results from the both reduce organism load and exotoxin produc-
release of bacterial antigens, known as superanti- tion [57]. Antimicrobial regimens are tailored to
gens, from S. aureus, GAS, and group C strepto- the specific organisms responsible for TSS.
coccus. The superantigen causes leaking Table 2.2 outlines first- and second-line therapies
capillaries, which clinically results in fever, exan- for GAS, MSSA, and MRSA infections
them, mucositis, “strawberry” tongue, hypoten- (Table 2.2). It is important to mention that the
sion, multiorgan dysfunction, and convalescent role of clindamycin or linezolid in the antimicro-
desquamation [56]. Superantigens have the abil- bial regimen is to inhibit toxin production by both
ity to bypass MHC-limited antigen processing, S. aureus and GAS [57].
and instead bind unprocessed directly to MHC IVIG has been used as an adjuvant therapy in
class II molecules and activate T-cells [57]. the treatment of TSS as it has been shown to
TSS can be divided into two categories: men- block T-cell activation by staphylococcal and
strual and non-menstrual. Menstrual TSS is sec- streptococcal superantigens [63]. A Canadian
ondary to strains of S. aureus that produce toxic comparative observational study found that there
shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) and histori- was an improved 30-day survival in 21 patients
cally has been linked to superabsorbent tampons who received IVIG compared to the 32 patents
[58]. Non-menstrual TSS is associated with any who did not [7]. Subsequently, a multicenter ran-
staphylococcal infection that produces TSST-1, domized placebo control trial attempted to exam-
staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) serotype B, and ine the efficacy of IVIG in streptococcal TSS;
SE serotype C in addition to 11 different strepto- however, the trial only enrolled 21 patients and
coccal superantigens [59, 60]. was terminated due to low recruitment. The study
Staphylococcal TSS has an abrupt onset did analyze the 21 patients and found that there
with flu-like symptoms followed by confusion, was a higher mortality rate in the placebo group
lethargy, and agitation. Rash is common early at 28 days, although it did not meet statistical
in the illness; however, the characteristic significance [8].
28 E. Stamell and K. Krishnamurthy
zoster. Patients with AIDS or other conditions zoster [99]. Early complications include residual
with depressed cellular immunity are at risk for ptosis, lid scarring, deep scalp pitting, entropion,
chronic VZV encephalitis which may occur ectropion, pigmentary changes, and lid necrosis
months after an episode of herpes zoster. Patients [97]. Glaucoma, optic neuritis, encephalitis,
have a subacute clinical presentation with head- hemiplegia, and acute retinal necrosis are more
ache, fever, mental status changes, seizures, and severe long-term complications, the risk of which
focal neurologic defects [91]. Cerebrospinal fluid may be reduced by half with prompt initiation of
analysis reveals VZV DNA by polymerase chain antiviral therapy [19]. If herpes zoster ophthal-
reaction [92]. Death often results, although case micus is suspected, ophthalmology should be
reports have shown that high-dose intravenous consulted immediately.
acyclovir therapy may be efficacious [91]. While uncomplicated zoster may be adequately
Ramsay Hunt syndrome, also known as herpes treated with oral antivirals, such as valacyclovir
zoster oticus, is a herpetic infection of the inner, 1 g every 8 h for 7 days, disseminated and severe
middle, and external ear. It is a reactivation of infections require intravenous acyclovir 10 mg/kg
latent VZV virus in the geniculate ganglion, the ideal body weight every 8 h for 7–14 days.
sensory ganglion of the facial nerve; however, Although corticosteroids may be added as an
reactivation affects both the facial nerve (cranial adjuvant therapy in herpes zoster infections due to
nerve VII) and the vestibulocochlear nerve (cra- their anti-inflammatory properties, studies have
nial nerve VIII) due to their close proximity [93]. failed to show a beneficial effect on acute pain and
The incidence is about 5 cases per 100,000 of the in some instances had adverse effects, including
US population annually and occurs more fre- gastrointestinal symptoms, edema, and granulo-
quently in individuals over the age of 60 years cytosis. However, in Ramsay Hunt syndrome,
[94]. Patients present with severe ear pain, small steroids may be added to antiviral therapy if
vesicles on the pinna or oral mucosa, and facial there are no contraindications [100].
palsy [95]. Prompt diagnosis is paramount as ini- Zostavax is a live attenuated vaccine indicated
tiation of antiviral therapy within 72 h of the for the prevention of herpes zoster and post-her-
onset of symptoms leads to resolution of the petic neuralgia in individuals greater than 50
facial palsy in as many as 75% of cases [94]. years of age [101]. The vaccine has been shown
Herpes zoster ophthalmicus, the second most to reduce the incidence of herpes zoster by 51%,
common presentation of herpes zoster, involves reduce the incidence of post-herpetic neuralgia
the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve by 67%, and reduce the herpes zoster-related bur-
and occurs in up to 20% of patients with herpes den of illness by 61% [102]. Gabapentin has been
zoster [96, 97]. The ophthalmic division divides approved since 2002 by the US Food and Drug
into the nasociliary, frontal, and lacrimal branches. Administration (FDA) for the treatment of post-
The nasociliary nerve innervates the anterior and herpetic neuralgia [103].
posterior ethmoidal sinuses, conjunctiva, sclera,
cornea, iris, choroid, and the skin of the eyelids
and tip of the nose [96]. Hutchinson’s sign, first 2.5.1 Cytomegalovirus
described in 1864, is the appearance of a herpes
zoster lesion on the tip or side of the nose and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) or human herpesvirus-5
serves as a useful prognostic factor in the ensuing (HHV-5), a large double-stranded DNA virus of
ocular inflammation [98]. Uveitis followed by the viral family herpesviruses, is acquired by expo-
keratitis are the most common forms of ocular sure to infected children, sexual transmission, and
involvement [19]. Clinically, patients develop transfusion of CMV-infected blood products. Up
lesions on the margin of the eyelid occasionally to 80% of adults are infected with CMV [19].
associated with periorbital edema and ptosis. CMV causes a mild form of infectious mononu-
Chronic disease due to neurologic damage occurs cleosis in most affected immunocompetent indi-
in up to 30% of patients with this form of herpes viduals; however, in rare cases, fatal massive
2 Infectious Emergencies in Dermatology 33
hepatic necrosis can occur. Immunocompromised spots, bluish gray areas on the tonsils, and
individuals, including those with HIV, malignancy, Koplik’s spots, punctate blue-white lesions
or post-organ transplant patients, may have severe, surrounded by an erythematous ring on the buc-
complicated CMV infections [3]. cal mucosa, appear [80]. Complications of mea-
CMV infection in immunocompromised indi- sles include encephalitis, subacute sclerosing
viduals can either directly induce death or disable panencephalitis, and fetal death if infection
the patient’s immune system, making them even occurs during pregnancy [107].
more susceptible to secondary infections [104]. Vaccination is the gold standard for prevent-
CMV can be a fatal disease in newborns. When a ing infection. The measles, mumps, rubella
primary CMV infection is sustained during preg- (MMR) or MMR plus varicella (MMRV) is a live
nancy, transplacental transmission may occur and attenuated vaccine and as a result cannot be used
severely affect the fetus [80]. Nonimmune preg- in immuncompromised patients [3]. Although no
nant women, especially those working in health- antivirals have been effective in treating measles
care settings or daycare facilities, should take infection, vitamin A supplementation may reduce
precautions, primarily proper hand washing. deaths from measles by 50% as vitamin A
Cutaneous manifestations of congenital CMV deficiency has been shown to increase morbidity
include jaundice, petechiae, and purpura, referred and mortality [108].
to as “blueberry muffin” lesions and complications
include hearing loss and mental retardation [3].
Antiviral therapy should be given to affected 2.5.3 German Measles (Rubella)
immunocompromised patients in addition to pas-
sive immunization of CMV with hyperimmune Rubella is a viral infection caused by the rubella
globulin (HIG). Women who develop primary virus, an RNA virus in the Togaviridae family. It
CMV infections during pregnancy may prevent is associated with mild constitutional symptoms
transmission to the fetus with CMV HIG. that are more severe in adults compared to chil-
Ganciclovir is not approved for pregnant women, dren. Following a 2-week incubation period, a
but is safe for newborns [3]. pale erythematous eruption appears on the head
and spreads to the feet, lasting approximately 3
days. Forchheimer’s spots, macular petechiae, can
2.5.2 Measles (Rubeola) be identified on the soft palate. Often there is
coexistent tender lymphadenopathy, especially of
Measles, due to the morbillivirus, an RNA virus the occipital, posterior auricular, and cervical
in the Paramyxoviridae family, has markedly chains. Rubella is generally self-limiting, but
decreased in incidence since the development of severe complications may occur. Children are
vaccination against the virus. However, it remains more susceptible to thrombocytopenia, vasculitis,
an active disease in both developed and develop- orchitis, neuronitis, and progressive panencepha-
ing countries [105]. Generally, affected individu- litis [80]. Neonatal infections in the first trimester
als are unvaccinated children less than 5 years of can result in congenital defects, fetal death, spon-
age or vaccinated school-age children who failed taneous abortion, or premature delivery.
to develop immunity to the vaccine [106]. Prevention is via vaccination, and, as previously
The virus is transmitted via respiratory secre- stated, is contraindicated in immunocompromised
tions. Following an asymptomatic incubation of patients. Treatment of infection is supportive [3].
10–11 days, a high fever develops with subse-
quent rapid defervescence. Coryza, conjuncti-
vitis, and a barking cough are characteristic. 2.5.4 Parvovirus B19
Additionally, an eruption begins on the head with
erythematous macules and papules that coalesce Parvovirus B19 is a small, single-stranded DNA-
and spread distally involving the palms and soles. containing virus causing a wide range of diseases
One to two days prior to the exanthem, Herman’s varying from asymptomatic infections to fetal
34 E. Stamell and K. Krishnamurthy
demise. The most common form of infection is weeks gestation. Most fetal losses occur between
erythema infectiosum, or “fifth disease.” In gen- 20 and 28 weeks gestation [110].
eral, regardless of the clinical presentation, the The mainstay of treatment is supportive.
virus is self-limited with the exception of a few However, there are treatment modalities that have
circumstances [80]. The peak incidence of infec- been used. High-dose IVIG have been shown to
tion occurs in the winter and spring. It is trans- eliminate parvovirus B19 from the bone marrow.
mitted through respiratory secretions, blood Intrauterine transfusions can reverse fetal anemia
products, or vertically during pregnancy. and reduce fetal demise. Prevention and measures
Although parvovirus B19 is more common in to avoid susceptible people are often difficult as
children, infection does occur in adults with vary- once the rash appears and is recognized as parvovi-
ing clinical presentation. The seroprevalance of rus B19, patients are no longer contagious [3, 111].
parvovirus B19 antibodies increases with age—
up to 15% of children 1–5 years of age are
affected versus up to 80% of adults [5]. 2.6 Fungal Infections
Erythema infectiosum occurs after a 4–14-
day incubation period. Individuals develop the 2.6.1 Systemic Candidiasis
classic “slapped-cheek” facial erythema that
spares the nasal bridge and circumoral regions. Candida species are the most common cause of
One to four days later, erythematous macules fungal infections. While Candida albicans is the
and papules appear which progress to form a most common pathogen in oropharyngeal and
lacy, reticulate pattern most commonly cutaneous candidiasis, other species of Candida
observed on the extremities, lasting 1–3 weeks. have been isolated in a rising number of infec-
Once cutaneous signs appear, the individual is tions in both invasive and vaginal candidiasis
no longer contagious [5, 80]. Arthralgia or [112]. Systemic candidiasis is a fatal infection
arthritis, seen in up to 10% of patients with that is increasing in incidence, especially in
erythema infectiosum, is more common in immunocompromised patients. Risk factors
female adults and may occur in up to 60% of include chemotherapy, hematological diseases,
those infected [109]. and prolonged use of broad-spectrum antibiotics
Both children and adults may develop a dis- [113, 114].
tinct syndrome known as papular purpuric glove Cutaneous lesions occur in a minority of
and socks syndrome which is also secondary to patients, but when present can aid in early diag-
parvovirus B19. Clinically, patients have edema nosis and rapid initiation of appropriate treat-
and erythema of the palms and soles with pete- ment, especially since there is no specific
chiae and purpura associated with burning and diagnostic tool for systemic candidiasis [113].
pruritus [5]. Clinically, cutaneous lesions in systemic candidi-
Parvovirus B19 can cause complications in asis begin as macules that develop into papules,
three situations: immunosuppression, pregnancy, pustules, or nodules with a surrounding ery-
and underlying hematologic disease. Patients with thematous halo. The lesions are common on the
hematologic disease, such as sickle cell anemia or trunk and extremities. Purpura can be seen in
hereditary spherocytosis, who become infected patients with or without thrombocytopenia [113].
with parvovirus B19 are at risk of developing Tissue culture may isolate the fungi.
severe transient aplastic anemia. In general, recov- Antifungal medications should be started once
ery is usually spontaneous, but heart failure and systemic candidiasis is suspected. Fluconazole is
death may occur. Thrombocytopenia is another the treatment of choice for C. albicans; however,
less common complication. Fetal infection with other species of Candida require amphotericin B
parvovirus B19 can result in miscarriage or non- deoxycholate [113, 115]. The mortality rate asso-
immune hydrops fetalis [80]. The greatest risk to ciated with systemic candidiasis ranges from 46
the fetus is when infection is acquired before 20 to 75% [116].
2 Infectious Emergencies in Dermatology 35
factors for developing disseminated disease include and Panstronglus megistus [130]. Transmission
young age, AIDS, hematologic malignancies, solid occurs when a prior wound or an intact mucous
organ transplant, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, membrane is inoculated with the feces of an
immunosuppressive agents, and congenital T-cell infected bug [131].
deficiencies [126]. Patients often have fever, mal- Chagas disease occurs in two main phases:
aise, anorexia, and weight loss. Cutaneous findings the acute and chronic phases [132]. Acute Chagas
in disseminated histoplasmosis are nonspecific. disease develops after a 1–2-week incubation
They vary from mucocutaneous oral ulcers or ero- period and begins with a macular or papulonodu-
sions to erythematous or molluscum-like papules or lar, erythematous to violet, hard, painless lesion
nodules [3, 127]. The most common extracutaneous at the inoculation site [3]. Inoculation through
sites for disseminated involvement are the lung, the conjunctiva results in nonpainful, unilateral
spleen, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and liver; how- edema of the upper and lower eyelid for several
ever, any organ system can be involved. Severe dis- weeks, known as Romaña’s sign [131]. The
seminated disease can present as sepsis with lesion may ulcerate, but usually regresses in 3
hypotension, disseminated intravascular coagula- weeks. A maculopapular, morbilliform, or urti-
tion, renal failure, and acute respiratory distress carial eruption may also be seen. Associated
[126]. Uncommonly, patients can develop endo- signs of acute infection include satellite lymph-
carditis, central nervous system infection, or adenitis, fever, myalgia, and hepatosplenomeg-
Addison’s disease when there is destruction of bilat- aly [3]. The acute phase lasts for 4–8 weeks
eral adrenal glands by the fungus [126, 128]. [131].
Laboratory abnormalities are nonspecific, but Without successful treatment, the patient can
will often include elevated alkaline phosphatase go on to develop chronic Chagas disease [131].
levels, pancytopenia, an increased sedimentation The chronic form is characterized by cardiac and
rate, elevated C-reactive protein levels, high lac- gastrointestinal manifestations. Early cardiac
tate dehydrogenase levels, hypercalcemia, and findings include conduction-system abnormalities
increased ferritin expression [125, 126]. The and ventricular wall-motion abnormalities [130].
fungi can be cultured in the blood, but the diag- After time, patients progress to high-degree heart
nosis of disseminated histoplasmosis can be block, sustained and nonsustained ventricular
obtained by tissue biopsy of any involved site, tachycardia, sinus-node dysfunction, apical aneu-
revealing intracellular yeast forms surrounded by rysm, embolic phenomena, and progressive
a rim of clearing [3, 129]. dilated cardiomyopathy [133]. With these findings,
Treatment is not indicated in self-limited there is a high risk of sudden death [134].
infections. However, disseminated histoplasmo- Gastrointestinal Chagas disease involves the
sis requires systemic antifungal therapy (ampho- esophagus, colon, or both. Uncommon findings
tericin B 0.7–1 mg/kg/day or itraconazole are megaesophagus and megacolon [135].
200–400 mg daily) [3]. Diagnosis during the acute phase is made by
direct examination of Giemsa-stained blood
smears, touch preps, or lymph-node biopsy. In
2.7 Parasitic Infections the chronic phase, direct immunofluorescence
and PCR for anti-T. cruzi immunoglobulin M
2.7.1 American Trypanosomiasis antibodies can be diagnostic [132].
(Chagas Disease) Treatment with benznidazole 5 mg/kg/day
or nifurtimox 8–10 mg/kg/day in 3–4 doses
Chagas disease, also known as American try- has been shown to reduce the severity of symp-
panosomiasis, is caused by the parasite tom and shorten the clinical course during the
Trypanosoma cruzi, which is found in tropical acute infection. The cure rate during the acute
zones of the Americas. The parasite is transmitted phase is between 60 and 85% [130]. The
by the reduviid bug, which constitutes three main efficacy of treatment for chronic infection is
species: Triatoma infestans, Rhodnius prolixus, unclear [136].
2 Infectious Emergencies in Dermatology 37
9. Huang KF, Hung MH, Lin YS, Lu CL, Liu C, Chen 28. Lacz NL, Schwartz RA, Kapila R. Rocky Mountain
CC, Lee YH. Independent predictors of mortality for spotted fever. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.
necrotizing fasciitis: a retrospective analysis in a 2006;20(4):411–7.
single institution. J Trauma. 2011;71(2):467–73. 29. Stanek G, Wormser GP, Gray J, Strle F. Lyme bor-
10. Givner LB. Periorbital versus orbital cellulitis. reliosis. Lancet. 2011;379(9814):461–73.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21(12):1157–8. 30. des Vignes F, Piesman J, Heffernan R, Schulze TL,
11. Rudloe TF, Harper MB, Prabhu SP, Rahbar R, Stafford 3rd KC, Fish D. Effect of tick removal on
Vanderveen D, Kimia AA. Acute periorbital infec- transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi and Ehrlichia
tions: who needs emergent imaging? Pediatrics. phagocytophila by Ixodes scapularis nymphs.
2010;125(4):e719–26. J Infect Dis. 2001;183(5):773–8.
12. Mahalingam-Dhingra A, Lander L, Preciado DA, 31. Huppertz HI, Bohme M, Standaert SM, Karch H,
Taylormoore J, Shah RK. Orbital and periorbital Plotkin SA. Incidence of Lyme borreliosis in the
infections: a national perspective. Arch Otolaryngol Wurzburg region of Germany. Eur J Clin Microbiol
Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(8):769–73. Infect Dis. 1999;18(10):697–703.
13. Hasanee K, Sharma S. Ophthaproblem. Orbital cel- 32. Stanek G, Fingerle V, Hunfeld KP, Jaulhac B, Kaiser
lulitis. Can Fam Physician. 2004;50(359):365–7. R, Krause A, Kristoferitsch W, O’Connell S, Ornstein
14. Carfrae MJ, Kesser BW. Malignant otitis externa. K, Strle F, Gray J. Lyme borreliosis: clinical case
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008;41(3):537–49. definitions for diagnosis and management in Europe.
viii–ix. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(1):69–79.
15. Rosenstein NE, Perkins BA, Stephens DS, Popovic 33. Halperin JJ. Nervous system Lyme disease. Infect
T, Hughes JM. Meningococcal disease. N Engl J Dis Clin North Am. 2008;22(2):261–74. vi.
Med. 2001;344(18):1378–88. 34. Bhate C, Schwartz RA. Lyme disease: Part II.
16. Milonovich LM. Meningococcemia: epidemiology, Management and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol.
pathophysiology, and management. J Pediatr Health 2011;64(4):639–53. quiz 654, 653.
Care. 2007;21(2):75–80. 35. Brown SL, Hansen SL, Langone JJ. Role of serology
17. Sexton K, Lennon D, Oster P, Aaberge I, Martin D, in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. JAMA.
Reid S, Wong S, O’Hallahan J. Proceedings of the 1999;282(1):62–6.
Meningococcal Vaccine Strategy World Health 36. Branda JA, Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Ferraro MJ,
Organization satellite meeting, 10 March 2004, Johnson BJ, Wormser GP, Steere AC. 2-tiered anti-
Auckland, New Zealand. N Z Med J. body testing for early and late Lyme disease using
2004;117(1200):1. p preceding U1027. only an immunoglobulin G blot with the addition of
18. Ramos-e-Silva M, Pereira AL. Life-threatening a VlsE band as the second-tier test. Clin Infect Dis.
eruptions due to infectious agents. Clin Dermatol. 2010;50(1):20–6.
2005;23(2):148–56. 37. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, Halperin
19. James WD, Elston DM, Berger TG, Andrews GC. JJ, Steere AC, Klempner MS, Krause PJ, Bakken JS,
Andrews’ diseases of the skin: clinical dermatology. Strle F, Stanek G, Bockenstedt L, Fish D, Dumler JS,
London: Saunders Elsevier; 2011. Nadelman RB. The clinical assessment, treatment,
20. Healy CM, Baker CJ. The future of meningococcal and prevention of lyme disease, human granulocytic
vaccines. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(2):175–6. anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice
21. Usatine RP, Sandy N. Dermatologic emergencies. guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of
Am Fam Physician. 2010;82(7):773–80. America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(9):1089–134.
22. Dumler JS, Walker DH. Rocky Mountain spotted 38. Katz TM, Miller JH, Hebert AA. Insect repellents:
fever–changing ecology and persisting virulence. historical perspectives and new developments. J Am
N Engl J Med. 2005;353(6):551–3. Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):865–71.
23. Dantas-Torres F. Rocky Mountain spotted fever. 39. Nadelman RB, Nowakowski J, Fish D, Falco RC,
Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7(11):724–32. Freeman K, McKenna D, Welch P, Marcus R,
24. Spach DH, Liles WC, Campbell GL, Quick RE, Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Dennis DT, Wormser GP.
Anderson Jr DE, Fritsche TR. Tick-borne diseases in Prophylaxis with single-dose doxycycline for the
the United States. N Engl J Med. prevention of Lyme disease after an Ixodes scapu-
1993;329(13):936–47. laris tick bite. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(2):79–84.
25. Helmick CG, Bernard KW, D’Angelo LJ. Rocky 40. Vazquez M, Muehlenbein C, Cartter M, Hayes EB,
Mountain spotted fever: clinical, laboratory, and epi- Ertel S, Shapiro ED. Effectiveness of personal pro-
demiological features of 262 cases. J Infect Dis. tective measures to prevent Lyme disease. Emerg
1984;150(4):480–8. Infect Dis. 2008;14(2):210–6.
26. Parola P, Paddock CD, Raoult D. Tick-borne rick- 41. Moayeri M, Leppla SH. The roles of anthrax toxin in
ettsioses around the world: emerging diseases chal- pathogenesis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004;7(1):19–24.
lenging old concepts. Clin Microbiol Rev. 42. Wenner KA, Kenner JR. Anthrax. Dermatol Clin.
2005;18(4):719–56. 2004;22(3):247–56. v.
27. Gammons M, Salam G. Tick removal. Am Fam 43. Swartz MN. Recognition and management of anthrax–
Physician. 2002;66(4):643–5. an update. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(22): 1621–6.
2 Infectious Emergencies in Dermatology 39
44. Inglesby TV, O’Toole T, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, 61. Stevens DL. Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome.
Ascher MS, Eitzen E, Friedlander AM, Gerberding Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8(3):133–6.
J, Hauer J, Hughes J, McDade J, Osterholm MT, 62. McCormick JK, Yarwood JM, Schlievert PM. Toxic
Parker G, Perl TM, Russell PK, Tonat K. Anthrax as shock syndrome and bacterial superantigens: an
a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommenda- update. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:77–104.
tions for management. JAMA. 63. Kato K, Sakamoto T, Ito K. Gamma-globulin inhib-
2002;287(17):2236–52. its superantigen-induced lymphocyte proliferation
45. Dixon TC, Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hanna PC. and cytokine production. Allergol Int. 2007;56(4):
Anthrax. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(11):815–26. 439–44.
46. Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher 64. Adcock DM, Brozna J, Marlar RA. Proposed
MS, Eitzen E, Friedlander AM, Hauer J, McDade J, classification and pathologic mechanisms of purpura
Osterholm MT, O’Toole T, Parker G, Perl TM, fulminans and skin necrosis. Semin Thromb Hemost.
Russell PK, Tonat K. Anthrax as a biological 1990;16(4):333–40.
weapon: medical and public health management. 65. Carpenter CT, Kaiser AB. Purpura fulminans in
Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. JAMA. pneumococcal sepsis: case report and review. Scand
1999;281(18):1735–45. J Infect Dis. 1997;29(5):479–83.
47. Evans ME, Gregory DW, Schaffner W, McGee ZA. 66. Adcock DM, Hicks MJ. Dermatopathology of skin
Tularemia: a 30-year experience with 88 cases. necrosis associated with purpura fulminans. Semin
Medicine (Baltimore). 1985;64(4):251–69. Thromb Hemost. 1990;16(4):283–92.
48. McGinley-Smith DE, Tsao SS. Dermatoses from 67. Betrosian AP, Berlet T, Agarwal B. Purpura fulmin-
ticks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(3):363–92. ans in sepsis. Am J Med Sci. 2006;332(6):339–45.
quiz 393–6. 68. Varon J, Chen K, Sternbach GL. Rupert Waterhouse
49. Choi E. Tularemia and Q fever. Med Clin North Am. and Carl Friderichsen: adrenal apoplexy. J Emerg
2002;86(2):393–416. Med. 1998;16(4):643–7.
50. Dana AN. Diagnosis and treatment of tick infesta- 69. Zomorrodi A, Wald ER. Ecthyma gangrenosum:
tion and tick-borne diseases with cutaneous manifes- considerations in a previously healthy child. Pediatr
tations. Dermatol Ther. 2009;22(4):293–326. Infect Dis J. 2002;21(12):1161–4.
51. Amagai M, Matsuyoshi N, Wang ZH, Andl C, 70. Baro M, Marin MA, Ruiz-Contreras J, de Miguel SF,
Stanley JR. Toxin in bullous impetigo and staphylo- Sanchez-Diaz I. Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis and
coccal scalded-skin syndrome targets desmoglein 1. ecthyma gangrenosum as initial manifestations of primary
Nat Med. 2000;6(11):1275–7. immunodeficiency. Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163(3):173–4.
52. Odom RB, James WD, Berger TG. Andrews’ dis- 71. Wong SN, Tam AY, Yung RW, Kwan EY, Tsoi NN.
eases of the skin: clinical dermatology. St. Louis, Pseudomonas septicaemia in apparently healthy
MO: Mosby; 2000. children. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1991;80(5):515–20.
53. Cribier B, Piemont Y, Grosshans E. Staphylococcal 72. Bettens S, Delaere B, Glupczynski Y, Schoevaerdts
scalded skin syndrome in adults. A clinical review D, Swine C. Ecthyma gangrenosum in a non-neutro-
illustrated with a new case. J Am Acad Dermatol. paenic, elderly patient: case report and review of the
1994;30(2 Pt 2):319–24. literature. Acta Clin Belg. 2008;63(6):394–7.
54. Murray RJ. Recognition and management of 73. Gucluer H, Ergun T, Demircay Z. Ecthyma gan-
Staphylococcus aureus toxin-mediated disease. grenosum. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38(4):299–302.
Intern Med J. 2005;35 Suppl 2:S106–19. 74. Brown ZA, Wald A, Morrow RA, Selke S, Zeh J,
55. Gemmell CG. Staphylococcal scalded skin syn- Corey L. Effect of serologic status and cesarean deliv-
drome. J Med Microbiol. 1995;43(5):318–27. ery on transmission rates of herpes simplex virus from
56. Macias ES, Pereira FA, Rietkerk W, Safai B. mother to infant. JAMA. 2003;289(2): 203–9.
Superantigens in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 75. Kimberlin DW. Neonatal herpes simplex infection.
2011;64(3):455–72. quiz 473–4. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(1):1–13.
57. Lappin E, Ferguson AJ. Gram-positive toxic shock 76. Yeager AS, Arvin AM. Reasons for the absence of a
syndromes. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(5):281–90. history of recurrent genital infections in mothers of
58. Schlievert PM, Blomster DA. Production of staphy- neonates infected with herpes simplex virus.
lococcal pyrogenic exotoxin type C: influence of Pediatrics. 1984;73(2):188–93.
physical and chemical factors. J Infect Dis. 77. Brown ZA, Selke S, Zeh J, Kopelman J, Maslow A,
1983;147(2):236–42. Ashley RL, Watts DH, Berry S, Herd M, Corey L.
59. Bohach GA, Fast DJ, Nelson RD, Schlievert PM. The acquisition of herpes simplex virus during preg-
Staphylococcal and streptococcal pyrogenic toxins nancy. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(8):509–15.
involved in toxic shock syndrome and related ill- 78. Whitley RJ, Corey L, Arvin A, Lakeman FD, Sumaya
nesses. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1990;17(4):251–72. CV, Wright PF, Dunkle LM, Steele RW, Soong SJ,
60. Fraser JD, Proft T. The bacterial superantigen and Nahmias AJ, et al. Changing presentation of herpes
superantigen-like proteins. Immunol Rev. simplex virus infection in neonates. J Infect Dis.
2008;225:226–43. 1988;158(1):109–16.
40 E. Stamell and K. Krishnamurthy
79. Arvin AM, Yeager AS, Bruhn FW, Grossman M. 97. Liesegang TJ. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus natural
Neonatal herpes simplex infection in the absence of history, risk factors, clinical presentation, and mor-
mucocutaneous lesions. J Pediatr. 1982;100(5):715–21. bidity. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(2 Suppl):S3–12.
80. Rebora A. Life-threatening cutaneous viral diseases. 98. Zaal MJ, Volker-Dieben HJ, D’Amaro J. Prognostic
Clin Dermatol. 2005;23(2):157–63. value of Hutchinson’s sign in acute herpes zoster
81. Kusuhara T, Nakajima M, Inoue H, Takahashi M, ophthalmicus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
Yamada T. Parainfectious encephalomyeloradiculitis 2003;241(3):187–91.
associated with herpes simplex virus 1 DNA in cere- 99. Harding SP. Management of ophthalmic zoster.
brospinal fluid. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(9): J Med Virol. 1993;(Suppl 1):97–101.
1199–205. 100. Dworkin RH, Johnson RW, Breuer J, Gnann JW,
82. Fatahzadeh M, Schwartz RA. Human herpes sim- Levin MJ, Backonja M, Betts RF, Gershon AA,
plex virus infections: epidemiology, pathogenesis, Haanpaa ML, McKendrick MW, Nurmikko TJ,
symptomatology, diagnosis, and management. J Am Oaklander AL, Oxman MN, Pavan-Langston D,
Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(5):737–63. quiz 764–6. Petersen KL, Rowbotham MC, Schmader KE, Stacey
83. Marcus B, Lipozencic J, Matz H, Orion E, Wolf R. BR, Tyring SK, van Wijck AJ, Wallace MS, Wassilew
Herpes simplex: autoinoculation versus dissemination. SW, Whitley RJ. Recommendations for the manage-
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2005;13(4): 237–41. ment of herpes zoster. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44 Suppl
84. Sanderson IR, Brueton LA, Savage MO, Harper JI. 1:S1–26.
Eczema herpeticum: a potentially fatal disease. Br 101. Arnou R, Fiquet A, Thomas S, Sadorge C.
Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;294(6573):693–4. Immunogenicity and safety of ZOSTAVAX(R)
85. Enders G, Miller E, Cradock-Watson J, Bolley I, approaching expiry potency in individuals aged
Ridehalgh M. Consequences of varicella and herpes >/=50 years. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7(10):1060–5.
zoster in pregnancy: prospective study of 1739 cases. 102. Sanford M, Keating GM. Zoster vaccine (Zostavax):
Lancet. 1994;343(8912):1548–51. a review of its use in preventing herpes zoster and
86. Smith CK, Arvin AM. Varicella in the fetus and new- postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. Drugs Aging.
born. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14(4): 2010;27(2):159–76.
209–17. 103. Thomas B, Farquhar-Smith P. Extended-release
87. Chapman SJ. Varicella in pregnancy. Semin gabapentin in post-herpetic neuralgia. Expert Opin
Perinatol. 1998;22(4):339–46. Pharmacother. 2011;12(16):2565–71.
88. Selleger C. [Fatal varicella pneumonia in adults. 104. Adler SP, Marshall B. Cytomegalovirus infections.
Report of two cases and review of literature (author’s Pediatr Rev. 2007;28(3):92–100.
transl)]. Rev Fr Mal Respir. 1979;7(1):9–18. 105. Cutts FT, Henao-Restrepo A, Olive JM. Measles
89. Grose C. Varicella vaccination of children in the elimination: progress and challenges. Vaccine.
United States: assessment after the first decade 1999;17 Suppl 3:S47–52.
1995–2005. J Clin Virol. 2005;33(2):89–95. discus- 106. Epidemiology of measles—United States, 2001–
sion 96–8. 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.
90. Marin M, Meissner HC, Seward JF. Varicella pre- 2004;53(31):713–716.
vention in the United States: a review of successes 107. Scott LA, Stone MS. Viral exanthems. Dermatol
and challenges. Pediatrics. 2008;122(3):e744–51. Online J. 2003;9(3):4.
91. Gnann Jr JW. Varicella-zoster virus: atypical presen- 108. Hussey GD, Klein M. A randomized, controlled trial
tations and unusual complications. J Infect Dis. of vitamin A in children with severe measles. N Engl
2002;186 Suppl 1:S91–8. J Med. 1990;323(3):160–4.
92. Gilden DH, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, LaGuardia 109. Balkhy HH, Sabella C, Goldfarb J. Parvovirus: a
JJ, Mahalingam R, Cohrs RJ. Neurologic complica- review. Bull Rheum Dis. 1998;47(3):4–9.
tions of the reactivation of varicella-zoster virus. N 110. Norbeck O, Papadogiannakis N, Petersson K, Hirbod
Engl J Med. 2000;342(9):635–45. T, Broliden K, Tolfvenstam T. Revised clinical pre-
93. Sweeney CJ, Gilden DH. Ramsay Hunt syndrome. J sentation of parvovirus B19-associated intrauterine
Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71(2):149–54. fetal death. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(9):1032–8.
94. Murakami S, Hato N, Horiuchi J, Honda N, Gyo K, 111. Katta R. Parvovirus B19: a review. Dermatol Clin.
Yanagihara N. Treatment of Ramsay Hunt syndrome 2002;20(2):333–42.
with acyclovir-prednisone: significance of early 112. Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, Filler SG, Pappas PG,
diagnosis and treatment. Ann Neurol. 1997;41(3): Dismukes WE, Edwards JE. Practice guidelines for
353–7. the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases
95. Uscategui T, Doree C, Chamberlain IJ, Burton MJ. Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(4):
Corticosteroids as adjuvant to antiviral treatment in 662–78.
Ramsay Hunt syndrome (herpes zoster oticus with 113. Pedraz J, Delgado-Jimenez Y, Perez-Gala S, Nam-
facial palsy) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Cha S, Fernandez-Herrera J, Garcia-Diez A.
Rev.2008;CD006852. Cutaneous expression of systemic candidiasis. Clin
96. Sanjay S, Huang P, Lavanya R. Herpes zoster oph- Exp Dermatol. 2009;34(1):106–10.
thalmicus. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 114. Pagano L, Mele L, Fianchi L, Melillo L, Martino B,
2011;13(1):79–91. D’Antonio D, Tosti ME, Posteraro B, Sanguinetti M,
2 Infectious Emergencies in Dermatology 41
Trape G, Equitani F, Carotenuto M, Leone G. 128. Smith JW, Utz JP. Progressive disseminated histo-
Chronic disseminated candidiasis in patients with plasmosis. A prospective study of 26 patients. Ann
hematologic malignancies. Clinical features and out- Intern Med. 1972;76(4):557–65.
come of 29 episodes. Haematologica. 2002;87(5): 129. Wheat LJ, Freifeld AG, Kleiman MB, Baddley JW,
535–41. McKinsey DS, Loyd JE, Kauffman CA. Clinical
115. Ratip S, Odabasi Z, Karti S, Cetiner M, Yegen C, practice guidelines for the management of patients
Cerikcioglu N, Bayik M, Korten V. Clinical micro- with histoplasmosis: 2007 update by the Infectious
biological case: chronic disseminated candidiasis Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis.
unresponsive to treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;45(7):807–25.
2002;8(7):435–6. 442–34. 130. Rassi Jr A, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas disease.
116. Uzun O, Ascioglu S, Anaissie EJ, Rex JH. Risk fac- Lancet. 2010;375(9723):1388–402.
tors and predictors of outcome in patients with can- 131. Bern C. Antitrypanosomal therapy for chronic
cer and breakthrough candidemia. Clin Infect Dis. Chagas’ disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):
2001;32(12):1713–7. 2527–34.
117. Sun HY, Singh N. Mucormycosis: its contemporary 132. Lescure FX, Le Loup G, Freilij H, Develoux M,
face and management strategies. Lancet Infect Dis. Paris L, Brutus L, Pialoux G. Chagas disease:
2011;11(4):301–11. changes in knowledge and management. Lancet
118. Reyes HM, Tingle EJ, Fenves AZ, Spiegel J, Burton Infect Dis. 2010;10(8):556–70.
EC. Pulmonary invasive mucormycosis in a patient 133. Rassi Jr A, Rassi A, Little WC. Chagas’ heart dis-
with secondary iron overload following deferoxam- ease. Clin Cardiol. 2000;23(12):883–9.
ine therapy. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 134. Rassi Jr A, Rassi SG, Rassi A. Sudden death in
2008;21(4):378–81. Chagas’ disease. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2001;76(1):
119. Roden MM, Zaoutis TE, Buchanan WL, Knudsen TA, 75–96.
Sarkisova TA, Schaufele RL, Sein M, Sein T, Chiou 135. de Oliveira RB, Troncon LE, Dantas RO,
CC, Chu JH, Kontoyiannis DP, Walsh TJ. Epidemiology Menghelli UG. Gastrointestinal manifestations of
and outcome of zygomycosis: a review of 929 reported Chagas’ disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93(6):
cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(5):634–53. 884–9.
120. Van Cutsem J, Boelaert JR. Effects of deferoxamine, 136. Marin-Neto JA, Rassi Jr A, Avezum Jr A, Mattos
feroxamine and iron on experimental mucormycosis AC, Rassi A, Morillo CA, Sosa-Estani S, Yusuf S.
(zygomycosis). Kidney Int. 1989;36(6):1061–8. The BENEFIT trial: testing the hypothesis that try-
121. Almyroudis NG, Sutton DA, Linden P, Rinaldi MG, panocidal therapy is beneficial for patients with
Fung J, Kusne S. Zygomycosis in solid organ trans- chronic Chagas heart disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo
plant recipients in a tertiary transplant center and Cruz. 2009;104 Suppl 1:319–24.
review of the literature. Am J Transplant. 137. David CV, Craft N. Cutaneous and mucocutaneous
2006;6(10):2365–74. leishmaniasis. Dermatol Ther. 2009;22(6):491–502.
122. Liang KP, Tleyjeh IM, Wilson WR, Roberts GD, 138. Murray HW, Berman JD, Davies CR, Saravia NG.
Temesgen Z. Rhino-orbitocerebral mucormycosis Advances in leishmaniasis. Lancet. 2005;366(9496):
caused by Apophysomyces elegans. J Clin Microbiol. 1561–77.
2006;44(3):892–8. 139. Solbach W, Laskay T. The host response to
123. Spellberg B, Walsh TJ, Kontoyiannis DP, Edwards Jr Leishmania infection. Adv Immunol. 2000;74:
J, Ibrahim AS. Recent advances in the management 275–317.
of mucormycosis: from bench to bedside. Clin Infect 140. Weigle K, Saravia NG. Natural history, clinical evo-
Dis. 2009;48(12):1743–51. lution, and the host-parasite interaction in New
124. Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Delaying World cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Clin Dermatol.
amphotericin B-based frontline therapy significantly 1996;14(5):433–50.
increases mortality among patients with hematologic 141. Ahluwalia S, Lawn SD, Kanagalingam J, Grant
malignancy who have zygomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. H, Lockwood DN. Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis:
2008;47(4):503–9. an imported infection among travellers to central
125. Goodwin Jr RA, Shapiro JL, Thurman GH, Thurman and South America. BMJ. 2004;329(7470):
SS, Des Prez RM. Disseminated histoplasmosis: 842–4.
clinical and pathologic correlations. Medicine 142. Scope A, Trau H, Bakon M, Yarom N, Nasereddin A,
(Baltimore). 1980;59(1):1–33. Schwartz E. Imported mucosal leishmaniasis in a
126. Kauffman CA. Histoplasmosis: a clinical and labora- traveler. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(6):e83–7.
tory update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(1): 115–32. 143. Amato VS, Tuon FF, Siqueira AM, Nicodemo AC,
127. Reddy P, Gorelick DF, Brasher CA, Larsh H. Neto VA. Treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis in
Progressive disseminated histoplasmosis as seen in Latin America: systematic review. Am J Trop Med
adults. Am J Med. 1970;48(5):629–36. Hyg. 2007;77(2):266–74.
Drug Eruptions
3
Rita V. Patel and Gary Goldenberg
Table 3.1 Clinical features distinguishing SJS, SJS/TEN overlap, and TEN [9]
Clinical entity SJS SJS/TEN overlap TEN
Primary Lesions Dusky red lesions Dusky red lesions Poorly delineated erythematous
Flat atypical targets Flat atypical targets plaques with desquamation
Dusky red lesions
Flat atypical targets
Distribution Isolated lesions Isolated lesions Isolated lesions (rare)
Confluence (+) of face Confluence (++) of face Confluence (+++) of face and trunk
and trunk and trunk
Mucosal Yes Yes Yes
Involvement
Systemic Usually Always Always
Symptoms
% BSA <10 10–30 >30
Detachment
SJS, TEN, and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome severity-of-illness score for TEN (SCORTEN
are clinical diagnoses supported by compatible [Table 3.3]) [32]. Experts advocate admission to
histologic findings. Currently, there are no uni- an intensive care unit, when the score is 2. Once
versally accepted diagnostic criteria and histo- the SCORTEN reaches 3 the predicted mortality
logic findings are neither specific nor diagnostic. is 35% [1].
Despite these limitations, the diagnosis of SJS or Garcia-Doval and colleagues demonstrated
TEN would be appropriate in a patient with a his- better prognosis with early withdrawal of the
tory of antecedent drug exposure or illness, a pro- causative agent, and exposure to agents with long
drome of acute-onset febrile illness with malaise, half-lives carried higher mortality [33]. Oplatek
diffuse erythema which progresses to vesicles or et al. [34] showed that early referral to a special-
bullae, or necrosis with sloughing of the epider- ized ICU, along with supportive care, correlated
mis. Rapid supportive evidence of SJS or TEN with increased survival rates.
should be obtained by submitting a frozen sec- Patients with SJS or TEN are at high risk of
tion of the already peeling layer of skin, which infection which can enter through the compro-
can help the clinician institute treatment as soon mised skin barrier. Sepsis remains a prominent
as possible. The histology of skin lesions com- cause of mortality; however, prophylactic sys-
monly reveals a subepidermal bullae with temic antibiotics are not employed by the major-
full-thickness necrosis of the epidermis. ity of burn units. Topical antibiotics are commonly
Histopathologic analysis of the skin biopsy is used such as silver nitrate and newer silver-
critical in ruling out other diagnoses such as auto- imbued nanocrystalline gauze materials [35].
immune blistering diseases, bullous fixed drug Supportive care is comparable to that in those
eruptions, AGEP, and, although uncommon in with severe burns, focusing on correcting hypov-
adults, staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome olemia, electrolyte imbalance, renal insufficiency,
[30]. Extent of skin involvement is a major prog- and sepsis. Daily wound care and nutritional/
nostic factor and when evaluating BSA coverage, hydrational support most commonly take place in
only necrotic skin which is already detached an intensive care setting. A dermatologic consult
should be included in the evaluation [31]. Various is warranted for cutaneous care. For the face and
appropriate cultures should be performed on sera, isotonic sterile sodium chloride solution
blood, wounds, and mucosal lesions to evaluate should be used to wash sites, an antibiotic oint-
for the presence of staphylococcal species, in ment should be applied to orifices, and silicone
particular. In children, serologies for Mycoplasma dressings are used to cover denuded areas. An
pneumoniae infection should also be sought out. ocular examination by an opthamologist should
As soon as the diagnosis of SJS or TEN has be carried out regularly as well [15].
been established, the severity, prognosis, and The use of systemic corticosteroids in SJS/TEN
management plan can be determined via the remainscontroversial.Theoretically,glucocorticoids
3 Drug Eruptions 47
increase the risk of sepsis, increase protein catabo- ondary to corneal inflammation also occurs in
lism, and decrease the rate of epithelialization. those without initial infection of the eye and is
Studies have found that administration of systemic considered to be the most severe long-term com-
glucocorticoids was associated with increased mor- plication in SJS/TEN survivors [47, 48]. Long-
bidity and mortality, particularly if patients had term mucosal complications including xerostomia
TEN and received glucocorticoids for prolonged or keratoconjunctivitis have also been reported in
periods of time [36]. As a consequence of the dis- small clinical studies [49].
covery of the anti-Fas potential of pooled human Hematologic abnormalities, particularly ane-
intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) in vitro, mia and lymphopenia, are common in TEN.
IVIG (1 g/kg/day for 3 consecutive days) has been Eosinophilia is unusual despite the strong associa-
tested for the treatment of TEN. To date the major- tion of TEN with drug ingestion. Neutropenia is
ity of studies confirm the mortality benefit, excel- noted in approximately one-third of patients and
lent tolerability, and low toxic potential of IVIG. correlates with poor prognosis. Glucocorticoids
However, caution should be exercised in those with can cause demarginalization and mobilization of
renal or cardiac insufficiency and thromboembolic neutrophils in the circulation, giving a falsely ele-
risk. Use of IVIG is contraindicated in those with vated white blood count. This must be considered
IgA antibodies or IgA deficiency [37–41]. In one in patients who received these agents prior to test-
phase II trial, although not statistically significant, ing, as this may obscure neutropenia [13, 50].
cyclosporine was administered orally (3 mg/kg/day The time course of SJS/TEN from prodrome
for 10days) and resulted in no deaths, whereas the to hospital discharge in the absence of significant
prognostic score predicted 2.75 deaths amongst the complications is typically 2–4 weeks.
29 patients with SJS, SJS/TEN, or TEN included in Reepithelialization may begin after several days
the trial [42]. Other anti-inflammatory therapies, and typically requires 2–3 weeks.
like tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) antago-
nists, have been published in case reports; however
the published data is insufficient to draw a conclu- 3.3 Drug Rash with Eosinophilia
sion on the therapeutic potential of TNF-a antago- and Systemic Symptoms
nists in TEN [43].
Rechallenge with culprit drugs is not recom- DRESS is a severe and potentially fatal adverse
mended in the patient with SJS/TEN; however, drug reaction characterized by fever, skin erup-
the current focus of allergy testing lies more on tion, hematologic abnormalities (prominent
ex vivo/in vitro tests such as the lymphocyte eosinophilia or atypical lymphoctytes), and
transformation test (LTT) which measures the multi-organ involvement which may affect the
proliferation of T cells to a drug in vitro by gen- liver, kidneys, heart, and/or lungs [51, 52]. Also
erating T-lymphocyte cell lines and clones. known as the drug-induced hypersensitivity syn-
Pichler and Tilch report a sensitivity of 60–70% drome, DRESS has other noteworthy features
for those allergic to beta-lactam antibiotics in the including a delayed onset, usually 2–6 weeks
classic exanthematic drug rash [44]. However, after initiation of drug therapy, and the possible
the sensitivity of LTT is still very low in SJS/ persistence or aggravation of symptoms despite
TEN. To improve the sensitivity in SJS and TEN, the discontinuation of the culprit drug [17].
LTT should be done within 1 week after onset of The estimated incidence of this syndrome
the disease to get the highest sensitivity [45]. ranges from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 drug expo-
Studies have shown TEN to commonly pro- sures [53]. The incidence may be higher in African
duce sequelae including hypo- and hyperpigmen- Americans and patients from the Caribbean.
tation (63%), nail dystrophies (38%), and ocular DRESS is considered to be a Gell and Coombs
complications [46]. Chronic ophthalmic compli- type IV reaction (Table 3.4). Type IV drug reac-
cations occur more frequently in patients with tions involve the activation of T cells and in some
initial ocular involvement, but loss of vision sec- cases other cell types (macrophages, eosinophils,
48 R.V. Patel and G. Goldenberg
or neutrophils). Clinically, those reactions involving Herpes viruses have been shown to reactivate in a
T cells have prominent cutaneous findings, because certain order with the cascade of reactivation ini-
the skin is a repository for T cells. Many cutaneous tiated by Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), human her-
T cells are primed memory-effector cells, which pes virus-6 (HHV-6), HHV-7, and then
react rapidly if immunogenic agents penetrate the cytomegalovirus (CMV) [58]. In one study,
skin barrier or diffuse into the skin from the circu- HHV-6 was detected via PCR in six of seven
lation [54, 55]. patients with DRESS [58]. It has been hypothe-
In Type IV reactions, onset of clinical presen- sized that certain drugs have intrinsic properties
tation is usually delayed by at least 48–72 h and to induce an immunosuppression that reactivates
sometimes by days to weeks following exposure herpes viruses. Subsequent antiviral T cell activa-
to culprit drug. Upon rechallenge with the sus- tion leads to a cross-reaction with drug antigens,
pect drug, symptoms can appear within 24 h. and, as a consequence, DRESS develops.
Onset of symptoms depends partly upon the Although this could suggest a key role for the
number of T cells activated by the drug. These viral infection in the development of an immuno-
responses are polyclonal in nature, and symptoms logic reaction, it could just represent nonspecific
appear rapidly if the drug stimulates a large num- activation of a ubiquitous virus [59].
ber of different T cell clones. In contrast, a drug Clinically, this hypersensitivity syndrome
that activates just a few clones may not cause develops 2–6 weeks after the culprit drug is initi-
clinical symptoms until these T cells have prolif- ated, which is of later onset compared to most
erated for a longer period of time, such as weeks. other immunologically mediated skin reactions.
In DRESS, patients may suddenly develop signs Fever and a morbilliform eruption are the most
and symptoms of a fulminant immune reaction. common symptoms seen in 85 and 75% of cases,
This reaction results from uncontrolled expan- respectively. The face, upper trunk, and extremi-
sion of oligoclonal T cells that have been mas- ties are usual sites of involvement (Fig. 3.3).
sively stimulated by the culprit drug, reminiscent Vesicles, tense bullae, pustules, erythroderma,
of superantigen-like stimulation [56]. and purpuric lesions can also be seen. In one
Detection of herpes viruses has been recently study by Chen et al. [60] involving DRESS sub-
proposed as a diagnostic marker of DRESS [57]. jects close to half of all patients were reported to
3 Drug Eruptions 49
around the injection site if a drug was adminis- diagnosis in patients of any age includes viral
tered locally by intramuscular or subcutaneous exanthems, urticarial vasculitis, acute rheumatic
injection. Skin changes may be prominent at the fever, and disseminated gonococcemia or
lateral aspect of the feet and the hands, at the meningococcemia.
junction of the sole and side of the foot, or at the Randomized controlled trial data concerning
border between the palm and dorsal skin of the the treatment of serum sickness or SSLRs is lack-
fingers or hands. Mucus membranes are spared. ing; however, one published retrospective chart
Virtually all patients develop fever which usually review of the management of children with
peaks 38.5°C, and arthralgias appear in approxi- SSLRs caused by cefaclor showed that discon-
mately two-thirds of patients with metacarpopha- tinuation of the culprit drug in combination with
langeal joints, knees, wrists, and ankles most antihistamines and glucocorticoids provides the
commonly involved [73, 74]. most symptomatic relief [87].
Neutropenia, mild thrombocytopenia, and
eosinophlia can be present, and mild proteinuria
occurs in about 50% of patients. During severe 3.6 Conclusion
episodes, complement measurements including
C3, C4, and total hemolytic complement are All patients who experience a drug eruption
depressed reflecting complement consumption. should be instructed to avoid the culprit drug and
Histologically, mild perivascular infiltrates con- any other closely related drugs with suspicion of
sisting of lymphocytes and histiocytes in the cross-reactivity. In the future as the laboratory
absence of vessel necrosis are observed in skin technology for drug allergy testing develops,
biopsies of those who develop serum sickness there may be an additional means to confirm the
from equine antithymocyte globulin [86]. clinical diagnosis of a drug eruption. Considering
Diagnosis of serum sickness and SSLRs is the diagnostic similarities and overlapping mor-
made clinically after exposure to a potential phological features of the various forms of drug
offending agent. Complete blood count with dif- eruptions, biopsies should always be used to help
ferential, urinalysis, serum chemistries, and com- make a definitive diagnosis (Table 3.6).
plement studies often aid in diagnosis. Skin Additionally, physicians should always err on the
biopsies are rarely used in confirmation of diag- side of caution when dealing with any subject
nosis as findings are variable. The differential with a possible drug eruption.
34. Oplatek A, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients dilemma of classification. Clin Dermatol.
treated for toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Burn Care 2005;23(3):311–4.
Res. 2006;27(1):26–33. 52. Descamps V, et al. Association of human herpesvirus
35. Dunn K, Edwards-Jones V. The role of acticoat with 6 infection with drug reaction with eosinophilia and
nanocrystalline silver in the management of burns. systemic symptoms. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(3):
Burns. 2004;30 Suppl 1:S1–9. 301–4.
36. Wolf R, et al. Life-threatening acute adverse cutane- 53. Fiszenson-Albala F, et al. A 6-month prospective sur-
ous drug reactions. Clin Dermatol. 2005;23(2): vey of cutaneous drug reactions in a hospital setting.
171–81. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149(5):1018–22.
37. Brown KM, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: does 54. Clark RA, et al. The vast majority of CLA + T cells are
immunoglobulin make a difference? J Burn Care resident in normal skin. J Immunol. 2006;176(7):
Rehabil. 2004;25(1):81–8. 4431–9.
38. Prins C, Gelfand EW, French LE. Intravenous immu- 55. Schaerli P, et al. A skin-selective homing mechanism
noglobulin: properties, mode of action and practical for human immune surveillance T cells. J Exp Med.
use in dermatology. Acta Derm Venereol. 2007;87(3): 2004;199(9):1265–75.
206–18. 56. Pichler WJ. Pharmacological interaction of drugs with
39. Campione E, et al. High-dose intravenous immuno- antigen-specific immune receptors: the p-i concept.
globulin for severe drug reactions: efficacy in toxic Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;2(4):301–5.
epidermal necrolysis. Acta Derm Venereol. 57. Picard D, et al. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and
2003;83(6):430–2. systemic symptoms (DRESS): a multiorgan antiviral
40. Prins C, et al. Treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis T cell response. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(46):46ra62.
with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins: multi- 58. Eshki M, et al. Twelve-year analysis of severe cases
center retrospective analysis of 48 consecutive cases. of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symp-
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(1):26–32. toms: a cause of unpredictable multiorgan failure.
41. Shortt R, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin does not Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(1):67–72.
improve outcome in toxic epidermal necrolysis. 59. Saida S, et al. A case of drug-induced hypersensitivity
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2004;25(3):246–55. syndrome-like symptoms following HHV-6 encephal-
42. Valeyrie-Allanore L, et al. Open trial of ciclosporin opathy. Allergol Int. 2010;59(1):83–6.
treatment for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic 60. Chen YC, Chiu HC, Chu CY. Drug reaction with
epidermal necrolysis. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163(4): eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: a retrospective
847–53. study of 60 cases. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(12):
43. Harr T, French LE. Severe cutaneous adverse reac- 1373–9.
tions: acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, 61. Gupta A, et al. Drug-induced hypothyroidism: the
toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syn- thyroid as a target organ in hypersensitivity reactions
drome. Med Clin North Am. 2010;94(4):727–42. x. to anticonvulsants and sulfonamides. Clin Pharmacol
44. Pichler WJ, Tilch J. The lymphocyte transformation Ther. 1992;51(1):56–67.
test in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy. 62. Spanou Z, et al. Involvement of drug-specific T cells
2004;59(8):809–20. in acute drug-induced interstitial nephritis. J Am Soc
45. Kano Y, et al. Utility of the lymphocyte transforma- Nephrol. 2006;17(10):2919–27.
tion test in the diagnosis of drug sensitivity: depen- 63. Chung WH, et al. Medical genetics: a marker for
dence on its timing and the type of drug eruption. Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nature.
Allergy. 2007;62(12):1439–44. 2004;428(6982):486.
46. Magina S, et al. Dermatological and ophthalmologi- 64. Walsh SA, Creamer D. Drug reaction with eosino-
cal sequels in toxic epidermal necrolysis. Dermatology. philia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): a clinical
2003;207(1):33–6. update and review of current thinking. Clin Exp
47. Gueudry J, et al. Risk factors for the development of Dermatol. 2011;36(1):6–11.
ocular complications of Stevens-Johnson syndrome 65. Mockenhaupt M. Severe drug-induced skin reactions:
and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Arch Dermatol. clinical pattern, diagnostics and therapy. J Dtsch
2009;145(2):157–62. Dermatol Ges. 2009;7(2):142–60. quiz 161-2.
48. Power WJ, et al. Analysis of the acute ophthalmic 66. Bohan KH, Mansuri TF, Wilson NM. Anticonvulsant
manifestations of the erythema multiforme/Stevens- hypersensitivity syndrome: implications for pharma-
Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis disease ceutical care. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(10):
spectrum. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(11):1669–76. 1425–39.
49. Roujeau JC, et al. Reporting adverse drug reactions. 67. Beltraminelli HS, et al. Acute generalized exanthema-
Lancet. 1985;2(8466):1244. tous pustulosis induced by the antifungal terbinafine:
50. Westly ED, Wechsler HL. Toxic epidermal necrolysis. case report and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol.
Granulocytic leukopenia as a prognostic indicator. 2005;152(4):780–3.
Arch Dermatol. 1984;120(6):721–6. 68. Halevy S. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulo-
51. Wolf R, et al. Drug rash with eosinophilia and sys- sis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9(4):
temic symptoms vs toxic epidermal necrolysis: the 322–8.
3 Drug Eruptions 55
69. Bachot N, Roujeau JC. Differential diagnosis of 79. Brucculeri M, Charlton M, Serur D. Serum sickness-
severe cutaneous drug eruptions. Am J Clin Dermatol. like reaction associated with cefazolin. BMC Clin
2003;4(8):561–72. Pharmacol. 2006;6:3.
70. Roujeau JC. Clinical heterogeneity of drug hypersen- 80. Vial T, et al. Cefaclor-associated serum sickness-like
sitivity. Toxicology. 2005;209(2):123–9. disease: eight cases and review of the literature. Ann
71. Sidoroff A, et al. Risk factors for acute generalized Pharmacother. 1992;26(7–8):910–4.
exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)-results of a multi- 81. Molldrem JJ, et al. Antithymocyte globulin for
national case–control study (EuroSCAR). Br J patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J
Dermatol. 2007;157(5):989–96. Haematol. 1997;99(3):699–705.
72. Pirquet SV. Serum sickness. Baltimore: Wilkins; 82. Hommes DW, van Deventer SJ. Infliximab therapy in
1951. Crohn’s disease: safety issues. Neth J Med.
73. Lawley TJ, et al. A prospective clinical and immuno- 2003;61(4):100–4.
logic analysis of patients with serum sickness. N Engl 83. D’Arcy CA, Mannik M. Serum sickness secondary to
J Med. 1984;311(22):1407–13. treatment with the murine-human chimeric antibody
74. Vincent C, Revillard JP. Antibody response to horse IDEC-C2B8 (rituximab). Arthritis Rheum.
gamma-globulin in recipients of renal allografts: rela- 2001;44(7):1717–8.
tionship with transplant crises and transplant survival. 84. Todd DJ, Helfgott SM. Serum sickness following
Transplantation. 1977;24(2):141–7. treatment with rituximab. J Rheumatol.
75. Clark BM, et al. Severe serum sickness reaction to 2007;34(2):430–3.
oral and intramuscular penicillin. Pharmacotherapy. 85. Lundquist AL, et al. Serum sickness following rabbit
2006;26(5):705–8. antithymocyte-globulin induction in a liver transplant
76. Wilson CB, Dixon FJ. Quantitation of acute and recipient: case report and literature review. Liver
chronic serum sickness in the rabbit. J Exp Med. Transpl. 2007;13(5):647–50.
1971;134(3):7–18. 86. Bielory L, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of serum
77. King BA, Geelhoed GC. Adverse skin and joint reac- sickness in patients receiving antithymocyte globulin.
tions associated with oral antibiotics in children: the J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;13(3):411–7.
role of cefaclor in serum sickness-like reactions. 87. Joubert GI, et al. Selection of treatment of cefaclor-
J Paediatr Child Health. 2003;39(9):677–81. associated urticarial, serum sickness-like reactions
78. Knowles SR, Shear NH. Recognition and manage- and erythema multiforme by emergency pediatricians:
ment of severe cutaneous drug reactions. Dermatol lack of a uniform standard of care. Can J Clin
Clin. 2007;25(2):245–53. viii. Pharmacol. 1999;6(4):197–201.
Histamine-Mediated Emergencies
4
Alyx Rosen, Sarit Itenberg, and Adam Friedman
productivity quite efficiently. Notably, once Though histamine is the principle mediator of
released into circulation, histamine is elevated hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis, it is
for only 30–60 min, making it a poor marker for not the only one. Research has shown that other
mast cell and basophil activation [2]. However, a granule-associated preformed mediators
metabolite of histamine, methylhistamine, is (tryptase, chymase, and heparin), newly formed
present in the urine for up to 24 h after peak mediators (prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and
plasma histamine levels [2], and may be used as a platelet activating factor), and numerous cytok-
diagnostic tool. ines and chemokines are released during the
Histamine exerts specific actions by binding degranulation cascade (Fig. 4.2).
to one of four known human histamine recep- Release of mediators can occur within several
tors designated H1–H4 (Table 4.1). Its effects, minutes of the inciting event. The release of
however, are potentiated mainly through the inflammatory cytokines, however, can take several
H 1 and H 2 receptors and include vasodilation hours, thereby mainly contributing to late phase
(seen as erythema, flushing, and hypotension), reactions [2]. Late phase reactions occur within
increased vascular permeability by separation 2–24 h of exposure to the inciting event and are
of endothelial cells (seen as angioedema), due to the migration of leukocytes to the skin,
smooth muscle contraction (seen as stomach respiratory tract, or gastrointestinal tract. Cytokines
cramps and diarrhea), increased cardiac con- may also contribute to protracted reactions that
traction (leading to tachycardia and arrhyth- can last hours to days without a clear resolution of
mias), and increased glandular secretion symptoms. This is not to be confused with bipha-
(allergic rhinitis, dyspnea, and bronchocon- sic reactions. Biphasic reactions are characterized
striction) [1, 2]. Finally, histamine stimulates by initial symptoms of a uniphasic anaphylactic
the release of cyclic adenine monophosphate response that resolve spontaneously or with treat-
(cAMP), leading to increased production of ment, followed by an asymptomatic period
mast cells in the bone marrow. Activation of (1–72 h), and then a recurrence of symptoms with-
the H3 receptor in the peripheral and central out further exposure to antigen [3–5]. The second
nervous system leads to increased neurotrans- response in biphasic reactions may be less severe,
mitter release causing vertigo, nausea, and similar to, or more severe than the original epi-
vomiting (Fig. 4.1). The numerous effects of sode, and can be fatal. Biphasic reactions can
histamine explain why the clinical signs and occur in patients of any age. The mechanism of
symptoms of urticaria, angioedema, bronchos- biphasic reactions is not completely understood.
pasm, hypotension, and gastrointestinal symp- There are also no consistently reported risk factors,
toms can occur rapidly after mast cell and which creates a clinical dilemma for clinicians
basophil activation [2]. treating patients for anaphylaxis [4].
4 Histamine-Mediated Emergencies 59
Fig. 4.1 Systemic effects of histamine. Adapted from: Maintz L et al. Dtsch Artzebl 2006;103:A3477–83
Fig. 4.2 Mediators released by dermal mast cell degranulation. Adapated from Bolognia, Jean, Joseph L. Jorizzo, and
Ronald P. Rapini. “Dermatology.” 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby/Elsevier, 2008. Figure 19.4
largest number of incident cases among children capable allergens. While up to 50% of chronic
and adolescents [15]. However, accurate reporting urticaria cases are thought to be idiopathic, recent
is complicated by factors such as under diagnosis, studies show that approximately 35–45% of
under reporting, and a prior lack of a universal patients with idiopathic chronic urticaria in fact
definition for anaphylaxis, making a true estimate have an IgG autoantibody directed against mast
of exact cases difficult to measure [16]. cell or basophil surface-bound IgE. Thus, an
autoimmune process may actually cause many
cases of chronic urticaria.
4.4.3 Pathophysiology Mast cells reside in the skin and in connective
tissue near blood vessels in the lower respiratory
Acute urticaria and angioedema are caused by tract, bronchial lumen, central nervous system,
allergic IgE-mediated, non-IgE-mediated, and bone marrow, and gastrointestinal tract mucosa
nonimmunologic mechanisms. In allergic IgE- [14, 18]. Basophils are polymorphonuclear
mediated urticaria, the body views an antigen and leukocytes found circulating in the blood. They
produces specific IgE antibodies against this anti- constitute 0.1–2.0% of peripheral blood leuko-
gen [17]. The Fc portion of IgE has a strong cytes and are rarely found in tissues [18]. When
affinity for the Fce receptor-1 (FceR1) proteins on these cells are activated, preformed and newly
the surface of mast cells and basophils. Once the formed mediators are released; the most impor-
IgE binds to these receptors, a person is consid- tant is histamine.
ered “sensitized” to the IgE-specific antigen. As Similar to urticaria and angioedema described
many as half a million molecules of IgE can fix to above, anaphylaxis is caused by allergic IgE-
a single mast cell or basophil [18]. The body can mediated, non-IgE-mediated, and nonimmuno-
be exposed to an antigen through the skin, mucous logic mechanisms. It too is a result of mast cell
membranes, respiratory tract, or the gastrointesti- and basophil activation and subsequent release of
nal tract. histamine and other small molecules. The wide
Upon reintroduction, the antigen binds to sev- and variable distribution of mast cells and baso-
eral IgE antibodies already bound to mast cells or phils throughout the body may explain why sys-
basophils, causing cross-linking of the IgE anti- temic features seen in anaphylaxis are not present
bodies, thus activating the inflammatory cascade during the activation of cutaneous mast cells in
that clinically presents as urticaria and/or angioe- patients who present with urticaria or angioe-
dema (Fig. 4.3). Cross-linkage of IgE antibodies dema. The effects of the released chemical medi-
may also occur from anti-IgE antibodies or other ators include smooth muscle contraction,
Fig. 4.3 Mast cell/basophil degranulation. Adapted from Alberts, Bruce. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th ed. 1 vols.
New York: Garland Science, 2002. Print. Figure 24–27
4 Histamine-Mediated Emergencies 63
especially in the pulmonary and gastrointestinal Thus, IgE-dependent reactions occur only
systems, coronary artery vasoconstriction, after the patient has been previously exposed at
increased vascular permeability and capillary least once to the antigen and is sensitized.
leakage. Extravasation of fluid and protein from Conversely, non-IgE mediated reactions can
blood vessels leads to a decrease in plasma vol- occur following a single, first time exposure to
ume, reduction in venous return, and circulatory certain agents in non-sensitized individuals.
collapse [11, 18]. Because immunologic reactions produce the
Anaphylactic shock is reserved for cases of same clinical manifestations, regardless of the
circulatory collapse that occur during anaphylac- method of histamine release, treatment is uniform
tic reactions. There are four broad classifications [24]. Nonimmunologic triggers induce mast cell
of shock (hypovolemic, cardiogenic, distributive, and basophil activation without evidence of
and obstructive). Anaphylactic shock may be a involvement of IgE, IgG, or immune complexes,
combination of hypovolemic shock due to capil- and are elaborated on later in this chapter.
lary leakage, distributive shock secondary to
vasodilation, and cardiogenic shock because of
decreased cardiac contractility [19]. Half of all 4.4.4 Clinical Features
deaths due to anaphylaxis result from circulatory
collapse and shock. The other half are from air- The lesions of acute urticaria appear as erythema-
way obstruction [20]. tous wheals (Fig. 4.4). They are pruritic and blanch-
Aside from the classic immunologic IgE- able and generally resolve within 12–24 h without
mediated hypersensitivity reactions, clinically
identical presentations can occur via immuno-
logic non-IgE mediated or nonimmunologic
mechanisms. Immunologic non-IgE mediated
reactions occur through activation of the comple-
ment system via immune complexes, and genera-
tion of kallikrein and bradykinin. Certain
byproducts of the complement cascade, includ-
ing plasma-activated complement 3 (C3a),
plasma-activated complement 4 (C4a), and
plasma-activated complement 5 (C5a), are called
anaphylotoxins and can cause mast cell or baso-
phil activation without IgE involvement [21].
Nonimmunologic reactions are a result of physi-
cal factors or antigens acting directly on mast
cells and basophils to cause degranulation and
histamine release, and not via an antigen–anti-
body interaction [14]. With regards to immuno-
logic contact urticaria, the pathophysiology is
similar to what was described above for allergic
IgE-mediated urticaria. In contrast, nonimmuno-
logic contact urticaria is thought to occur inde-
pendent of histamine and rather through
prostaglandin release from the epidermis. This is
based on the beneficial response in such cases to
acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and nonsteroidal anti-
Fig. 4.4 Urticaria. Photo courtesy of Dr. Douglas I.
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus antihista- Rosen, Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, Division
mines [22, 23]. of Dermatology, Montefiore Medical Center
64 A. Rosen et al.
do patients require hospitalization. One way to protective doses, which may protect many high-risk
help differentiate between fish poisoning and a patients against accidental ingestion reactions [40].
seafood allergy is that most people eating the However, until larger randomized trials are con-
same meal will demonstrate a response to scom- ducted to further evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of
brotoxic fish versus only those with a specific fish OIT versus avoidance, which is the current main-
allergy are expected to experience symptoms stay of management, OIT cannot be considered for
[35]. Regardless of the mechanism of toxicity, routine clinical practice [40, 41].
scombroid poisoning is treated in a similar man-
ner to food allergy. 4.4.6 B Medications and Blood Products
Peanut allergy remains the most common Drug allergy is considered a type of adverse drug
cause of food-induced anaphylaxis. It typically reaction and there is tremendous overlap between
starts in early childhood but a late-onset cohort of drugs that lead to urticaria, angioedema, and life-
patients can also be seen. The incidence of child- threatening anaphylaxis. Medications can trigger
hood peanut allergy is increasing and exceeds a anaphylaxis through immunologic IgE-dependent,
prevalence of 1% in the US [36]. In contrast to immunologic non-IgE-mediated, or nonimmuno-
children with milk, egg, and wheat allergies, only logic mechanisms. Several medications can also
a small proportion outgrow peanut allergy [37], act through multiple different mechanisms.
and vigilant lifelong avoidance is necessary. Antibiotics are the most common cause of IgE-
Signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis typically dependent reactions, especially beta-lactams such
develop within 30 min of food ingestion but can as penicillins and cephalosporins, and less fre-
also occur within 5 min and rarely up to 2 h later. quently, sulfonamides and tetracyclines [42].
The skin and respiratory systems are involved in Biologic agents including vaccines and hormones,
up to 76% and 80% of patients, respectively, and as well as radiocontrast dye and certain monoclo-
gastrointestinal symptoms are seen frequently in nal antibodies, also act through IgE-dependent
cases of food-induced anaphylaxis [38, 39]. pathways; however, the majority of hypersensi-
Respiratory collapse is the cause of death in most tivity reactions to radiocontrast media are nonim-
fatal cases of food-induced anaphylaxis. Shock is munologic. Radiocontrast media may also act via
a rare physiologic component and almost never complement activation that subsequently leads to
seen without respiratory compromise [32]. mast cell activation [28]. As the use of monoclo-
Several recent studies have assessed the efficacy, nal antibodies in various clinical settings contin-
safety, and feasibility of oral immunotherapy (OIT) ues to increase, there is also a rise in incidence of
for high-risk patients with severe peanut allergies. hypersensitivity reactions. Many of these reac-
One study was conducted in 23 children, ages 3–14 tions are seen with the first dose of therapy, impli-
years, with confirmed IgE-mediated peanut aller- cating a nonimmunologic mechanism of action.
gies. They received OIT following a rush protocol However, many patients also experience IgE-
with roasted peanut for 7 days or, if protective doses dependent reactions or even delayed reactions,
of 0.5 g (0.16 teaspoons) of peanut were not achieved with symptoms developing after several future
during the rush protocol, long-term buildup with doses [5]. Systemic infusion reactions related to
biweekly dose increases up to 0.5 g of peanut was the rate of monoclonal antibody drug infusion
performed. Twenty-two of 23 patients continued also occur.
with the long-term protocol and 14 reached the Opioids cause mainly nonimmunologic
0.5 g protective dose after a median of 7 months. hypersensitivity reactions while ASA classi-
Subsequently, these patients were able to tolerate a cally acts via a non-IgE-mediated immunologic
median of 1 g of peanut, in comparison to 0.19 g of pathway. NSAIDs produce mainly nonimmu-
peanut before OIT. Therefore, it was determined nologic and rarely IgE-dependent immunologic
that for long-term buildup, but not rush, OIT was reactions [28] and are responsible for up to 25%
safe and effective in reaching clinically relevant of all adverse drug reactions. After taking ASA
4 Histamine-Mediated Emergencies 67
or other NSAIDs, one-third of patients with deficiency. Up to 40% of patients with IgA
controlled underlying chronic urticaria and up deficiency produce IgG or IgE anti-IgA antibodies.
to two-thirds of patients with active chronic During blood transfusions, the IgG or IgE anti-IgA
urticaria will have exacerbations of urticaria or antibodies attack the IgA proteins in the donor
angioedema [43, 44]. blood. Two ways to prevent or minimize a serious
Vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibiotic, can anaphylactic reaction could be to use washed red
cause two different hypersensitivity reactions: blood cells or blood from another IgA deficient
(1) nonimmunologic mast cell and basophil individual. In cases when IgA levels are not readily
degranulation causing “Red Man Syndrome” available, patients may be pretreated with antihis-
and (2) IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. “Red Man tamines prior to emergent therapy.
Syndrome” is far more common and is caused by The most severe cases of drug allergies can
a rapid infusion of vancomycin [45]. It typically occur immediately or hours to days following
presents with flushing, erythema, and pruritus of drug administration. Factors including prior
the face and upper torso but can also progress to sensitization, route of administration, drug
angioedema, hypotension, and, rarely, cardio- metabolism, drug interactions and concomitant
vascular depression [46]. While there is a corre- food intake play a modifying role [48] and affect
lation with the peak plasma histamine the rate of symptom development. Anaphylaxis
concentration during infusion and severity of the secondary to cutaneous injections or topical
reaction, elevated histamine levels may also be applications has only rarely been reported.
seen in patients treated with slower infusion rates
who do not experience “Red Man Syndrome” 4.4.6 C Latex
[47]. Other antibiotics have rarely been associ- Food and latex (natural rubber) are two of the
ated with “Red Man Syndrome.” most common causes of immunologic IgE-
Urticaria and angioedema can occur together mediated contact urticaria. In the 1980s, when
or independent of each other. In the case of universal precautions were implemented and the
angioedema without urticaria, it is important to use of latex gloves increased, so too did the inci-
consider an underlying complement system dence of type-I hypersensitivity reactions pre-
enzyme deficiency, such as hereditary or dominantly in healthcare settings. Typically,
acquired C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency. On reactions from a latex allergy occur within 30
the other hand, all patients treated with ACE min of exposure and include the development of
inhibitors, a type of antihypertensive, can expe- pruritus and urticaria to the localized area of con-
rience side effects related to increased bradyki- tact [49]. Generalized urticaria can occur and
nin, including angioedema without urticaria. often results from dissemination of the allergen
Therefore, special consideration should be taken (antigen) after direct contact with mucosal sur-
when prescribing ACE inhibitors in patients faces. Serious, life-threatening latex induced
who may have an underlying enzyme deficiency anaphylactic reactions can also occur.
due to their predisposition for angioedema. Latex allergy may be a source of morbidity for
Furthermore, it should be noted that symptoms patients in their work place, in particular medical
of angioedema secondary to an underlying workers and people in occupations where they
enzyme deficiency may be delayed up to a year are regularly exposed to or use latex gloves.
after beginning treatment with ACE inhibitors Individuals can also be exposed in their homes
and may be mistaken as a side effect of the with common latex items including balloons,
drug only. latex contraceptives, rubber bands, and much
Life-threatening reactions to the administration more. The latex-fruit syndrome refers to the
of human IgG are rare in clinical practice. The cross-reaction of latex allergens with many plant-
most common blood transfusion related anaphy- derived food allergens, which results from struc-
lactic reaction occurs in patients with IgA tural similarities between several latex and plant
68 A. Rosen et al.
antigenic proteins. The most commonly involved are based on clinical history of systemic reac-
fruits include kiwi, banana, avocado, passion tions, positive skin test, and knowledge of the
fruit, and chestnut. In this situation, it is difficult history and risk factors for a severe reaction to
to determine if the patients were first sensitized to treatment [21, 31].
latex or to fruit, which would help provide more
evidence-based prophylaxis [49]. It is highly 4.4.6 E Idiopathic
advised that when visiting a doctor patients make Idiopathic reactions are responsible for up to one-
their latex allergy known in order to help prevent third of all type I hypersensitivity reactions. The
life-threatening reactions. diagnosis is one of exclusion after a complete
medical history, skin prick testing, serum specific
4.4.6 D Hymenoptera Stings IgE levels, radioallergosorbent test (RAST), and
Venom from insects of the order Hymenoptera, other lab testing reveal no recognizable external
which includes ants, bees, hornets, wasps, and trigger. Similarly, any other diseases that could
yellow jackets, or saliva from biting insects mimic the anaphylactic hypersensitivity reaction
such as flies, mosquitoes, ticks, kissing bugs, picture should be ruled out. Patients should also
and caterpillars, can cause severe anaphylactic be evaluated for mastocytosis or clonal mast cell
reactions [ 50 ] . Insect stings as a cause of disorders [28]. Serum tryptase can be very useful
anaphylaxis can be seen all around the world in differentiating anaphylaxis from many condi-
with varying geographic areas affected more tions that can masquerade as anaphylaxis [53].
commonly by different families of Hymenoptera. The attack rate is variable and fatalities can occur.
Similarly, occupational hazards lend to Patients typically present with symptoms identi-
increased risks of specific allergies. An obvious cal to those of other type I hypersensitivity
example is seen with the bee venom allergy, reactions and individual patients tend to have
which is found in higher proportions in bee- the same physical manifestations on repeated
keepers [30]. Population-based studies have episodes.
difficulty calculating the overall prevalence of
Hymenoptera sting allergies, which may be 4.4.6 F Less Common Etiologies
responsible for up to 34.1% of all-cause Physical urticaria is an eruption in response to
anaphylaxis [31]. Severe systemic reactions are physical stimuli. Several defined subtypes of this
seen more frequently in adults and may present phenomenon include dermatographic (Fig. 4.5),
with all the same features of anaphylaxis with cold, heat, adrenergic, cholinergic, aquagenic,
hypotension being the most dominant feature
[30]. Baseline serum tryptase levels are the best
predictor of the severity of anaphylaxis in insect
sting-allergic patients [51, 52]. Understanding
the classification of the various insect stings
and bites that can lead to life-threatening hyper-
sensitivity reactions is helpful in patient man-
agement and future preventive therapy [50].
Specific venom immunotherapy (VIT) can pre-
vent morbidity and mortality in patients with
severe hymenoptera sting allergies. A 3–5 year
course of subcutaneous injections significantly
reduces the risk of anaphylaxis in up to 98% of
Fig. 4.5 Physical urticaria: dermatographism. Photo
children and is even effective and safe in high- courtesy of Dr. Douglas I. Rosen, Assistant Clinical
risk patients with mastocytosis. Indications and Professor of Medicine, Division of Dermatology,
recommendations for VIT differ by country and Montefiore Medical Center
4 Histamine-Mediated Emergencies 69
solar, pressure, vibratory, and exercise-induced/ ogy, location, and duration of cutaneous signs of
food and exercise-induced (Table 4.4) [54]. histamine release, in particular urticaria and
Severe life-threatening responses to physical angioedema, should also be undertaken. Specific
stimuli are exceedingly rare. Of all the physical testing should be based on information provided
urticarias, exercise-induced and food-exercise- in the history and physical and may include blood
induced urticaria/anaphylaxis, and primary cold tests, skin biopsies of notable lesions in patients
urticaria have the highest incidence of associated with lesions lasting more than 24 h, food chal-
anaphylaxis. lenges, skin testing for allergens, and tests
Viral infections, while not a primary cause of designed to look for functional autoantibodies
urticaria, have also been known to exacerbate against IgE or the high-affinity receptor (FceR1)
urticarial reactions. It is thought that the up regu- of dermal mast cells and basophils.
lation of cytokines during acute phases of illness A measurement of serum and urine histamine
may lead to an enhanced state of mediator release and histamine metabolites and serum tryptase
from mast cells. can be done to demonstrate mast cell or basophil
activation. Serum histamine levels remain ele-
vated for only 30–60 min after the onset of symp-
4.4.7 Differential Diagnosis toms; therefore normal serum histamine levels
cannot rule out a serious histamine-mediated
The differential diagnosis of histamine-mediated reaction. A 24-h urine study of methylhistamine
emergencies in dermatology is extensive. Because is more accurate and should be initiated as soon
cutaneous signs such as urticaria are frequently as possible after symptoms begin. Tryptase is a
the earliest signs of life-threatening events, con- proteinase specific to mast cells and levels remain
ditions with an urticarial component must be elevated for up to 5 h after mast cell activation. In
ruled out. These include insect bite reactions, cases of anaphylaxis, levels are expected to
Sweets’ syndrome (acute febrile neutrophilic exceed 10 ng/mL and can increase greater than
dermatosis), the urticarial stage of bullous pem- 100 ng/mL in anaphylaxis from hymenoptera
phigoid, acute contact dermatitis of the face, urti- stings or medications [12].
carial drug reactions, and urtication caused by Allergen-specific skin testing or radioallergo-
rubbing of the lesions of urticaria pigmentosa. sorbent (RAST) testing can be used to identify
The prolonged duration of the individual urticar- certain causes of immunologic IgE-mediated
ial lesions in these conditions helps to differenti- reactions to food, latex, stinging insects, and
ate them from true urticaria, lesions of which other environmental allergens. These reactions
typically last for less than 24 h. can manifest as acute urticaria, angioedema, con-
tact urticaria, or anaphylaxis. The recent National
Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
4.4.8 Diagnosis guidelines recommend that all children with a
clinically suspected immediate-type hypersensi-
4.4.8 A Urticaria and Angioedema tivity reaction, based on an allergy focused clini-
A comprehensive history and physical examina- cal history, undergo skin prick testing or specific
tion are essential in the diagnosis of a suspected IgE blood tests, in order to confirm the diagnosis.
histamine-mediated emergency. The sequential Additionally, these tests should only be per-
exposure to an agent with the development of formed where facilities are available to quickly
signs and symptoms, along with details of dis- manage and treat an anaphylactic reaction [55].
ease duration, known allergens, occupation, his- Patients with severe chronic urticaria should be
tory and frequency of similar episodes, duration tested for thyroid autoantibodies as well as have
of previous episodes, and any previously success- thyroid function tests performed if clinically rel-
ful or unsuccessful therapies should be reviewed. evant. Patients with chronic urticaria have a
A thorough physical exam assessing morphol- higher incidence of thyroid autoantibodies, which
70
may indicate an autoimmune etiology of the also highly likely if at least two of the following
patient’s urticaria. Limitations exist in confirming signs and symptoms are present: involvement of
the presence of functional serum autoantibodies. the skin or mucosa; respiratory compromise;
Immunoassays for anti-FceRI and anti-IgE may hypotension; or persistent gastrointestinal symp-
not be completely accurate as patients may have toms. Finally, criteria for diagnosing anaphylaxis
nonfunctional as well as functional autoantibod- can be completely based on a patient’s reduced
ies. Autologous serum skin tests (ASSTs) can be blood pressure after exposure to a known aller-
a helpful screening tool. They involve intrader- gen. In adults, a systolic blood pressure of less
mal injections of autologous serum versus saline than 90 mm Hg or a 30% or greater decrease from
controls with positive results demonstrated by a baseline is considered significant [10].
pink wheal response at 30 min that is 1.5 mm
greater in diameter than the control. Further
research is necessary to find accurate means to 4.4.9 Treatment
diagnose patients with functional autoantibodies
and an autoimmune etiology of anaphylaxis. 4.4.9 A Urticaria and Angioedema
Urticaria is often idiopathic, infrequently associ-
4.4.8 B Physical Urticaria ated with a known allergen, and rarely results in
Several different standards have been proposed to life-threatening conditions. The treatment is not a
aid in the diagnosis of the numerous physical clear-cut science and often requires a patient
urticarias. Table 4 provides a basic elicitation specific regimen. All patients who suffer from
strategy for each physical urticaria. Eliciting for a urticaria should be given information on common
physical urticaria along with antihistamine- precipitants. Antihistamines, topical antipruritic
responsive symptoms may be all that is required preparations, and the avoidance of known trig-
for diagnosis. However, some patients may prove gers are often a successful initial approach. Some
more difficult to accurately diagnose. Important patients, however, will need additional interven-
to remember is that patients may have severe tions, including systemic steroids.
reactions upon eliciting a physical urticaria and First line therapy for treatment of urticaria is
testing must be performed in a safe, controlled accomplished with antihistamines, which are
setting. most effective when taken on a daily basis rather
than as-needed symptomatic relief. Classic sedat-
4.4.8 C Anaphylaxis ing H1-antihistamines include chlorpheniramine,
Although anaphylaxis was first described over hydroxyzine, and diphenhydramine. While effec-
100 years ago, and is broadly understood as tive in controlling symptoms of urticaria, their
described above (see Urticaria, Angioedema, and potent sedative effects are a drawback, and they
Anaphylaxis: Definitions), there is still no univer- are not more efficient than the modern, non-sedating
sally accepted definition. In 2006, the second H1-antihistamines. Additionally, newer H1-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious antihistamines and their derivatives have less
Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network anticholinergic effects; therefore, patients experi-
symposium on the definition and management of ence less dry mouth, visual disturbances, tachy-
anaphylaxis was held to determine the necessary cardia, or urinary retention. Examples include
clinical criteria for diagnosing anaphylaxis. loratadine, desloratadine, cetirizine, levocetiriz-
Anaphylaxis is considered highly likely when ine, terfenadine, fexofenadine, and mizolastine
there is acute onset of illness (within minutes to (Table 4.5). H2-antihistamines, such as cimeti-
hours) with involvement of the skin, mucosal tis- dine and ranitidine, have no beneficial effect on
sue, or both AND either respiratory compromise histamine-induced pruritus, and should therefore
or evidence of end organ dysfunction (i.e., not be used as monotherapy for urticaria.
decreased blood pressure, incontinence, syncope). If symptoms are not improved after 2 weeks of
After exposure to a likely allergen, anaphylaxis is treatment with a non-sedating H1-antihistamine,
4 Histamine-Mediated Emergencies 73
Table 4.5 Treatment algorithm for urticaria and angioedema modified from international treatment recommendations
Treatment level Intervention Examples
First level Non-sedating H1-antihistamine Cetirizine
Newer non-sedating H1-antihistamine Loratadine
Terfenadine
Mizolastine
Levocetirizine
Desloratadine
Fexofenadine
Second level Increase dose of non-sedating H1-antihistamine up to 4 times
Third level Continue non-sedating H1-antihistamine and add a leukotriene antagonist Zafrilukast
Or, try changing H1-antihistamine Montelukast
Or, continue non-sedating H1-antihistamine and add Doxepin
Corticosteroidsa for severe exacerbations of acute urticaria or resistant cases Prednisone
of chronic urticaria. Short course (3–7 days) Prednisolone
Fourth level Add one of the following to H1-antihistamine
Cyclosporine
H2-antihistamine Cimetidine
Dapsone Ranitidine
Omalizumab
a
Pediatric prescribing manuals should be referenced for details on doses on children
Adapted from: Zuberbier, T. et al. Allergy 2009: 64: 1427–1443
increasing the dosage up to 4 times may provide antihistamine acitivity, may also be beneficial for
relief. Patients with chronic urticaria have patients unresponsive to antihistamine therapy.
demonstrated increased symptomatic relief from Dosing begins at 10–25 mg at night, and can be
doses of antihistamines up to 4 times higher than increased to up to 75 mg nightly [62]. Side effects
conventional doses without a compromise in may include sedation and weight gain.
safety [56]. Patients with frequent episodes of A short course (3–7 days) of high-dose corti-
idiopathic anaphylaxis may also benefit from the costeroids (prednisone or prednisolone 30–60 mg/
use of daily prophylactic H1-antihistamine. day) may be effective in antihistamine resistant
Patients should wait between 1 and 4 weeks cases of chronic urticaria or severe episodes of
before considering switching to alternative thera- acute urticaria when a rapid clinical response is
pies to allow for the full effectiveness of antihis- needed [63]. Longer treatments with steroids
tamine therapy. Patients should also try switching beyond 7–14 days are not recommended, but if
to a different H1-antihistamine before adding on necessary, should be carried out under the care of
additional medications [57]. a specialty clinic. Long-term use of systemic cor-
Second line therapies should be initiated if ticosteroids is associated with substantial adverse
symptomatic relief is not accomplished with anti- effects. Patients may be at increased risk for
histamines alone. The addition of a leukotriene developing diabetes mellitus, hypertension,
antagonist, such as zafirlukast or montelukast, osteoporosis, adrenal insufficiency, or gastroin-
may provide some patients relief from symptoms, testinal bleeding [64]. Patients who suffer from
especially patients with symptoms aggravated by chronic urticaria or known severe allergies to
NSAIDs and food additives [58, 59]. While evi- certain foods, medications, or insect bites
dence is limited for the use of lipoxygenase (zile- should carry a self-injectable epinephrine pen
uton) and cyclooxygenase (rofecoxib) inhibitors, (e.g., EpiPen) and be adequately trained in its use
these medications may also be effective for and administration.
chronic urticaria [60, 61]. Doxepin, a tricyclic If symptomatic relief is still not achieved, the
antidepressant with potent H1- and H2- addition of cyclosporine, H2-antihistamines,
74 A. Rosen et al.
with resultant decreased mucosal edema, injection into the postero-lateral calf muscle
reduction in angioedema and hives, and relief (gastrocnemius/soleus), with little overlying
of upper airway obstruction, hypotension, and subcutaneous fat and no endangered superficial
shock. Additional benefit from epinephrine arteries or nerves, may provide an effective
follows from the effects on alpha-2 (decreased alternative [79]. Otherwise, varying length nee-
insulin release), beta-1 (increased heart rate dles on preloaded syringes provide another
and force of cardiac contractions), and beta-2 option, although with reduced shelf life of the
(bronchodilation and decreased release of epinephrine.
mediators from mast cells and basophils) Up to 20% of patients require a second or
adrenergic receptors [76]. multiple injections due to persistent symptoms
In an emergency, epinephrine administered or a biphasic reaction. Maximum doses may be
intramuscularly or subcutaneously is the treat- repeated every 5–15 min as needed in the absence
ment of choice; however, intramuscular injec- of a response to epinephrine [21]. Posture may
tions have been shown to reach peak plasma also affect mortality in anaphylaxis and thus
epinephrine levels more rapidly than subcutane- patients should be kept lying down with raised
ous injections with an auto-injector in children at legs to maintain the vena cava as the lowest part of
risk of anaphylaxis [77]. The first-aid dose of the body. This helps blood flow return to the right
epinephrine is 0.5 mg for adults and 0.3 mg for side of the heart and ensures adequate myocardial
children [78]. Auto-injector formulations of perfusion [83]. Patients and caretakers must be
epinephrine include the EpiPen (Dey LP, Napa, properly instructed on the importance of and how
California, USA), Adrenaclick and Twinject to use emergency epinephrine auto-injectors so
(Sciele, Division of Shionogi, Japan), and the as to avoid injury from unintentional injections
Anapen (Lincoln Medical, Salisbury, Wiltshire, and to make sure epinephrine is delivered to the
UK; not available in the USA), and in most coun- individual experiencing an anaphylactic episode.
tries they are available in two fixed epinephrine Epinephrine auto-injectors, or any self-inject-
doses per injection, 0.3 mg (e.g., EpiPen) and able devices when auto-injectors are unavailable,
0.15 mg (e.g., EpiPen Jr.). The Twinject and the should be prescribed for individuals who have
Adrenaclick are similar devices but the Twinject already experienced anaphylaxis involving respi-
contains two doses of epinephrine where the ratory symptoms, hypotension, or shock, patients
Adrenaclick contains only one. In some coun- with known triggers that are commonly encoun-
tries, the Anapen is also available in a 0.5 mg tered in the community, including foods, insect
fixed epinephrine dose. The injections should be stings, or physical urticarias, and patients with a
administered intramuscularly in the lateral thigh history of idiopathic anaphylaxis [84]. Clinical
to control symptoms and maintain normal blood judgment should be used when prescribing an
pressures. The 0.3 mg and the 0.15 mg injectable epinephrine auto-injector for patients with a
doses are appropriate for pediatric patients over history of moderate to severe urticarial reactions
30 kg and between 15 and 30 kg, respectively. after exposure to a known inciting allergen but no
However, allergy specialists should be involved history of anaphylaxis. There are no contraindi-
in the treatment of children below 15 kg requir- cations to using epinephrine in anaphylaxis and
ing first-aid treatment with epinephrine for thus the threshold for prescribing should be low
anaphylaxis for which the 0.15 mg dose may be [78]. When multiple repeat intramuscular doses
too high [79]. of epinephrine are required, patients may benefit
With increasing rates of obesity in the USA from intravenous epinephrine in the form of bolus
[80], physicians must be aware that auto-injector epinephrine or a continuous infusion. However,
needles might not achieve appropriate depths for intravenous administration of epinephrine should
intramuscular injection, even in pediatric patients only be performed by a trained and experienced
[81, 82]. It has been proposed that in such patients, specialist [85].
76 A. Rosen et al.
Side effects of epinephrine include tachycardia, often absent in more advanced forms of sys-
anxiety, and headache, and caution should be temic disease [87]. Cutaneous mastocytosis is
applied for use in patients with hypertension, more common in children than in adults, with
ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, 55% of patients noted to have onset before 2
and diabetes mellitus. Additionally, side effects years of age and an additional 10% of patients
of epinephrine may mimic signs of anaphylaxis with disease onset before the age of 15 [88]. In
and care must be taken not to administer extrane- childhood disease, the skin is almost exclusively
ous doses. Oxygen therapy and placing the patient involved and skin lesions typically improve or
in the supine position with lower extremity eleva- resolve by late adolescence [89]. In contrast,
tion should also be maintained. Additional thera- adult-onset disease occurs between the ages of
pies depend on the severity of the anaphylactic 20 and 40 years, [89, 90] is more frequently
episode and include intravenous fluids, antihista- systemic, and disease persists throughout a
mines, vasopressors, corticosteroids, glucagon, patient’s lifetime. Although cutaneous mastocy-
atropine, and nebulized albuterol. Monitoring tosis is less commonly seen in the adult popula-
patients for several hours after an anaphylactic epi- tion, patients with systemic mastocytosis and
sode is extremely important, as is providing instruc- skin involvement are frequently diagnosed based
tions on how best to avoid future reactions based on their cutaneous lesions.
on the inciting antigen. The arrhythmogenicity of
epinephrine may be augmented by certain medi-
cations, including tricyclic antidepressants, drugs 4.5.2 WHO Categorization
such as cocaine, or underlying cardiac arrhythmias
[79]. Therefore, the benefits must be weighed The WHO classification of mastocytosis is an
against the potential side effects when prescrib- accepted clinical approach to help distinguish
ing epinephrine auto-injectors for patients. cutaneous mastocytosis, systemic mastocytosis,
Finally, efforts should be made to treat any under- and their subvariants [91]. The major types of
lying medical conditions since certain diseases, cutaneous mastocytosis include urticaria pigmen-
such as asthma or cardiovascular disease, can tosa, diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis, solitary
increase a patient’s risk for a severe anaphylactic mastocytoma, and telangiectasia macularis erup-
episode [78, 86]. tiva perstans. The majority of pediatric cases of
cutaneous mastocytosis show a good prognosis
with gradual resolution of both symptoms and
4.5 Mastocytosis skin lesions [92].
In children, systemic involvement is rare and
4.5.1 Definition and Epidemiology disease may regress spontaneously in puberty or
early adolescence. In adults, disease does not
Mastocytosis represents a collection of hetero- regress but rather has an indolent clinical course
geneous disorders characterized by the abnor- [87]. Survival in patients with indolent systemic
mal growth and accumulation of mast cells mastocytosis is not statistically different from the
and the aberrant release of mast cell mediators, general population. Prognoses for aggressive
predominantly histamine, in various organ systemic mastocytosis and mast cell leukemia,
systems. Mastocytosis can be broadly divided however, are poor, and median survival is around
into cutaneous mastocytosis, characterized by 41 months and 2 months, respectively [93].
the presence of one or more lesions limited to
the skin; and systemic mastocytosis, defined by
lesions affecting various internal organs, com- 4.5.3 Pathophysiology
monly the bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract,
liver, and spleen. Systemic mastocytosis may or In most patients with mastocytosis disease is
may not involve the skin. Cutaneous involve- caused by a gain of function mutation in KIT, the
ment is more common in indolent forms and mast/stem cell growth factor receptor that is
4 Histamine-Mediated Emergencies 77
symptoms and is also not predictive of systemic The cumulative prevalence of anaphylaxis in
disease [89]. Diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis children with mastocytosis is between 6% and
(DCM) is a rare severe form seen predominantly 9% and in adults is between 22% and 49%.
in infants. The skin is infiltrated by mast cells in Patients with systemic disease are at increased
a generalized and diffuse pattern. The skin is risk of anaphylaxis compared to patients with
thickened and appears doughy with a yellow dis- solely cutaneous disease [51]. Severe anaphylac-
coloration and accentuated folds. In areas of tic reactions with shock or cardiopulmonary
increased mast cell accumulation, nodules or arrest are more common in patients with sys-
plaques are present. Additionally, edema may temic mastocytosis, especially individuals with
result from the mast cell infiltration and degran- hymenoptera allergies. Deaths associated with
ulation in the skin [92]. Life-threatening hypoten- extensive mast cell mediator release are rare but
sive episodes are common complications of have been documented in both the pediatric and
DCM and occur due to the extent of lesions, adult populations. Overall, the spectrum of cuta-
which can involve the entire skin, and the large neous subtypes of mastocytosis has a good prog-
amount of mast cell mediator release locally and nosis in comparison to systemic disease.
systemically during severe episodes [94]. Bullous
eruptions with hemorrhage is a subvariant of
DCM seen predominantly in neonates with blis- 4.5.5 Diagnosis
ters erupting spontaneously or from a stimulus.
Patients may present at birth (congenital) or in The diagnosis of cutaneous mastocytosis requires
early infancy, but blistering typically resolves by a high index of suspicion in patients with skin
3–5 years of age [92]. Mild symptoms such as lesions with or without mast cell mediator-related
cutaneous flushing, blistering, or pruritus, or symptoms. These include flushing spells, pruri-
more severe symptoms such as shortness of tus, redness, swelling, respiratory symptoms,
breath, asthma exacerbations, hypotension, and including asthma exacerbations and shortness of
gastrointestinal symptoms, occur more com- breath, and gastrointestinal symptoms, including
monly in patients with systemic disease, but may peptic ulcer disease and diarrhea. The lesions of
also be seen in patients with severe cutaneous childhood and adult mastocytosis are very char-
disease, in particular DCM, due to the higher acteristic and may rarely be confused with other
concentrations of mast cells [89]. skin disorders. Demonstration of a positive
When cutaneous lesions are present in adults Darier’s sign, seen most commonly in patients
they appear different from the typical lesions with mastocytomas, is helpful in the diagnosis.
seen in children. They are 2–5 mm brown-reddish A negative sign, however, does not rule out
macules or papules. Telangiectasia macularis mastocytosis. Most diagnoses are based on
eruptiva perstans is seen in <1% of patients and clinical findings and results of skin biopsies.
exclusively in adults. The lesions appear as tan- Demonstration of increased mast cells in either
to-brown macules with patchy erythema and the blister fluid or skin biopsy of the mastocytosis
telangiectasias. patient may establish the correct diagnosis.
Evolution of a childhood cutaneous form of Special stains that recognize tryptase and KIT
mastocytosis to a systemic form is seen infre- (CD117) aid in the identification of tissue mast
quently. The signs and symptoms of systemic cells [96]. Analysis of KIT-receptor mutations,
mastocytosis reflect the infiltration of mast cells specifically the D816V mutation, within skin
into the involved tissues. Patients may present with mast cells is recommended. Serum tryptase
constitutional signs, skin lesions, mediator-related levels can also be an indicator of mast cell load,
findings (flushing, syncope, diarrhea, hypotension, but are more likely to be increased in patients
headache, and/or abdominal pain), and musculo- with systemic mastocytosis.
skeletal disease, with an increased risk of severe Systemic mastocytosis often requires more
osteoporosis [95]. invasive diagnostic measures. A workup should
4 Histamine-Mediated Emergencies 79
be performed in children when there is suspicion mutation in codon 816 in blood, bone marrow, or
of progression to a systemic adult form, severe other lesional tissue; (3) Mast cells in the bone
recurrent systemic mast cell mediator-related marrow, blood, or other lesional tissue express
symptoms, organomegaly, or skin lesions that fail CD25 or CD2; (4) Baseline total tryptase level is
to resolve. In adults, a careful workup is neces- persistently >20 mg/mL [51]. Further criteria are
sary to accurately diagnose and stage patients used to subcategorize patients based on the sever-
with systemic disease. Initial laboratory testing ity of their disease.
includes a complete blood count with differen-
tials, a chemistry panel, liver enzymes, and
tryptase levels [92]. Bone marrow examination 4.5.6 Treatment
with biopsies is also often indicated in adult
patients. There are no definitive effective treatments for
In most patients, histologic evaluation of bone patients with cutaneous mastocytosis or indolent
marrow biopsies and mast cell identification systemic mastocytosis, and aggressive forms of
allow for the most efficient diagnosis of sys- therapy in these patients are not indicated. In gen-
temic mastocytosis, as the bone marrow is almost eral, treatment of patients with mastocytosis is
always involved. Just as molecular detection of directed towards alleviating symptoms. Patients
KIT mutations are performed in skin biopsies, should be advised to avoid triggers and medica-
they can be performed on fresh bone marrow tions that induce mast cell degranulation, as well
aspirate, clot sections, bone marrow biopsy as heat and friction, which can induce local or
sections, and even peripheral blood if there are systemic symptoms. Local and systemic thera-
circulating mast cells. An immunohistochemistry pies should target symptoms related to mast cell
panel consisting of CD117, tryptase, and CD25, mediator release and symptomatic skin lesions.
with the latter not present in normal or reac- Patients with more severe disease, and especially
tive mast cells, can also detect neoplastic mast those with underlying asthma, respiratory condi-
cells [95]. tions, or known severe allergies (i.e., hymenoptera
Additional laboratory and radiographic stud- allergy), who are at increased risk of anaphylaxis,
ies may be indicated for patients with additional should be directed to carry an emergency kit with
signs of systemic involvement. Patients with self-injectable epinephrine, antihistamines, and
complaints of bone pain should have an X-ray corticosteroids at all times. Similar treatments as
evaluation to look for skeletal involvement. those described for urticaria, angioedema, and
However, in children with cutaneous mastocyto- anaphylaxis are also utilized in the treatment of
sis and no evidence of systemic disease, positive mastocytosis. First-line therapy is non-sedating
X-ray findings may falsely convey signs of sys- H1-anithistamines. For patients with recurrent
temic disease [97]. The liver, spleen, lymph episodes of anaphylaxis or persistent pruritus,
nodes, gastrointestinal tract, and any other organ prophylaxis with daily antihistamines is recom-
may also be involved, and require further imag- mended. Additionally, management of pruritus
ing or workup for diagnosis. and gastric hypersecretion may be accomplished
Ultimately, the diagnosis of systemic masto- with proton pump inhibitors, anticholinergics,
cytosis is based on World Health Organization cromolyn sodium (which inhibits mast cell
criteria, with one major and one minor, or three degranulation), or leukotriene antagonists.
minor criteria required. The major criterion is the Omalizumab (anti-IgE mAb) has also been
presence of multifocal dense infiltrates of mast successful in mastocytosis patients with multiple
cells in bone marrow and/or other extracutaneous episodes of anaphylaxis. Topical corticosteroids
tissues. The minor criteria include: (1) More than are effective for localized treatment, such as
25% of the mast cells in bone marrow smears or mastocytomas, and lifelong allergen-specific
tissue biopsy sections are spindle shaped or dis- venom immunotherapy (VIT) is recommended
play atypical morphology; (2) Detection of a c-kit for patients with mastocytosis and hymenoptera
80 A. Rosen et al.
venom allergy [51]. Finally, emergency manage- 8. Gober LM, Saini SS. Allergic urticaria. In: Tyring SK,
ment of anaphylaxis begins with an initial assess- Gaspari AA, editors. Clinical and basic immunoder-
matology. London: Springer; 2008. p. 459–77.
ment of the patient’s airway, breathing, circulation, 9. Sampson HA, et al. Symposium on the definition and
and vital signs, and then rapid administration of management of anaphylaxis: summary report.
epinephrine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(3):584–91.
10. Sampson HA, et al. Second symposium on the
definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary
report–Second National Institute of Allergy and
4.6 Conclusion Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis
Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
Emergencies in dermatology are infrequent, and 2006;117(2):391–7.
11. Kanji S, Chant C. Allergic and hypersensitivity reactions
histamine-mediated emergencies are even more in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:S162–
rare. As a very powerful mediator of hypersensi- 8. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181de0c99.
tivity reactions, histamine can result in classic 12. Sampson HA, Mendelson L, Rosen JP. Fatal and near-
clinical signs and symptoms that should not be fatal anaphylactic reactions to food in children and
Adolescents. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(6):380–4.
overlooked as they could very quickly evolve into 13. Zuberbier T. Urticaria. Allergy. 2003;58(12):
life-threatening entities. Immediate diagnosis and 1224–34.
appropriate intervention could be lifesaving. 14. Volcheck, G.W. Anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reac-
Urticaria, angioedema, and mastocytosis are the tions, in clinical allergy: diagnosis and Management.
Humana Press; 2009. p. 433–63.
most important histamine-mediated entities car- 15. Lieberman P, et al. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis:
rying the risk of anaphylaxis, shock, and possibly findings of the American College of Allergy, Asthma
death. It is of paramount importance to perform a and Immunology Epidemiology of Anaphylaxis
complete history (including possible triggers, Working Group. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol.
2006;97(5):596–602.
individual risk factors, and medications) and a 16. Clark S, Camargo Jr CA. Epidemiology of anaphy-
thorough physical examination. Any case of urti- laxis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2007;27(2):
caria should prompt a vigilant interaction between 145–63. v.
clinician and patient. 17. Wolf R. Emergency dermatology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 178–83. xi,
363.
18. Hall JE, Guyton AC. Guyton and Hall textbook of
References medical physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/
Elsevier; 2011. p. xix, 1091 p.
1. Maintz L, Novak N. Histamine and histamine intoler- 19. Brown SG. The pathophysiology of shock in anaphy-
ance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(5):1185–96. laxis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am.
2. Ogawa Y, Grant JA. Mediators of anaphylaxis. 2007;27(2):165–75. v.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2007;27(2):249–60. 20. Pumphrey RS. Lessons for management of anaphy-
vii. laxis from a study of fatal reactions. Clin Exp Allergy.
3. Lieberman P. Clinical aspects and diagnosis of ana- 2000;30(8):1144–50.
phylaxis. In: Pawankar R, Holgate ST, Rosenwasser 21. Simons FE. Anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
LJ, editors. Allergy frontiers: diagnosis and health 2010;125(2 Suppl 2):S161–81.
economics. Springer: Tokyo; 2009. p. 319–33. 22. Bhatia R, Alikhan A, Maibach HI. Contact urticaria:
4. Tole JW, Lieberman P. Biphasic anaphylaxis: review present scenario. Indian J Dermatol. 2009;54(3):
of incidence, clinical predictors, and observation rec- 264–8.
ommendations. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 23. Novembre E, et al. Urticaria and urticaria related skin
2007;27(2):309–26. viii. condition/disease in children. Eur Ann Allergy Clin
5. Viale PH, Yamamoto DS. Biphasic and delayed Immunol. 2008;40(1):5–13.
hypersensitivity reactions: implications for oncol- 24. Finn AA. Urticaria and angioedema. In: Lieberman P,
ogy nursing. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2010;14(3): Anderson JA, editors. Allergic diseases. London:
347–56. Humana Press; 2007. p. 199–215.
6. James WD, et al. Andrews’ diseases of the skin clini- 25. Yang MS, et al. Epidemiologic and clinical features of
cal dermatology. London: Saunders Elsevier; 2011. p. anaphylaxis in Korea. Annals of allergy, asthma &
138–54. immunology: official publication of the American
7. Fisher AA. Contact dermatitis. Philadelphia: Lea and College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.
Febiger; 1973. 2008;100(1):31–6.
4 Histamine-Mediated Emergencies 81
26. Frigas E, Park MA. Acute urticaria and angioedema: 47. Bircher AJ, Scherer K. Delayed cutaneous manifesta-
diagnostic and treatment considerations. Am J Clin tions of drug hypersensitivity. Med Clin North Am.
Dermatol. 2009;10(4):239–50. 2010;94(4):711–25. x.
27. Simons FER. Anaphylaxis pathogenesis and treat- 48. Shah D, Chowdhury MM. Rubber allergy. Clin
ment. Allergy. 2011;66:31–4. Dermatol. 2011;29(3):278–86.
28. Gonzalez-Perez A, et al. Anaphylaxis epidemiology 49. Freeman TM. Clinical practice. Hypersensitivity to
in patients with and patients without asthma: a United hymenoptera stings. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(19):
Kingdom database review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1978–84.
2010;125(5):1098.e1–104. 50. Brockow K, Ring J. Update on Diagnosis and
29. Krishna MT, et al. Diagnosis and management of Treatment of Mastocytosis. Curr Allergy Asthma
hymenoptera venom allergy: British Society for Rep. 2011;11(4):292–9.
Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) guide- 51. Rueff F, et al. Predictors of severe systemic anaphy-
lines. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011;41(9):1201–20. lactic reactions in patients with Hymenoptera venom
30. Bilò MB. Anaphylaxis caused by Hymenoptera stings: allergy: importance of baseline serum tryptase-a study
from epidemiology to treatment. Allergy. 2011;66: of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical
35–7. Immunology Interest Group on Insect Venom
31. Keet CA, Wood RA. Food allergy and anaphylaxis. Hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2007;27(2):193– 2009;124(5):1047–54.
212. vi. 52. Tanus T, et al. Serum tryptase in idiopathic anaphy-
32. Ayuso R. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of laxis: a case report and review of the literature. Ann
shellfish allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. Emerg Med. 1994;24(1):104–7.
2011;11(4):309–16. 53. Dice JP. Physical urticaria. Immunol Allergy Clin
33. Hungerford JM. Scombroid poisoning: A review. North Am. 2004;24(2):225–46. vi.
Toxicon. 2010;56(2):231–43. 54. Sackeyfio A, et al. Diagnosis and assessment of food
34. Taylor SL, Stratton JE, Nordlee JA. Histamine poi- allergy in children and young people: summary of
soning (scombroid fish poisoning): an allergy-like NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011;342:d747.
intoxication. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 55. Staevska M, et al. The effectiveness of levocetirizine
1989;27(4–5):225–40. and desloratadine in up to 4 times conventional doses
35. Sicherer SH, Leung DYM. Advances in allergic skin in difficult-to-treat urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
disease, anaphylaxis, and hypersensitivity reactions to 2010;125(3):676–82.
foods, drugs, and insects in 2010. J Allergy Clin 56. Zuberbier T, et al. EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO
Immunol. 2011;127(2):326–35. guideline: management of urticaria. Allergy.
36. Venter C, Arshad SH. Epidemiology of food allergy. 2009;64(10):1427–43.
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011;58(2):327–49. ix. 57. Erbagci Z. The leukotriene receptor antagonist mon-
37. Bochner BS, Lichtenstein LM. Anaphylaxis. N Engl J telukast in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urti-
Med. 1991;324(25):1785–90. caria: a single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover
38. Novembre E, et al. Anaphylaxis in children: clinical clinical study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110(3):
and allergologic features. Pediatrics. 1998;101(4):E8. 484–8.
39. Blumchen K, et al. Oral peanut immunotherapy in 58. Kosnik M, Subic T. Add-on montelukast in antihista-
children with peanut anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin mine-resistant chronic idiopathic urticaria. Respir
Immunol. 2010;126(1):83.e1–91. Med. 2011;105 Suppl 1:S84–8.
40. Thyagarajan A, et al. Peanut oral immunotherapy is 59. Anand MK, Nelson HS, Dreskin SC. A possible role
not ready for clinical use. J Allergy Clin Immunol. for cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors in the treatment of
2010;126(1):31–2. chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
41. Khan DA, Solensky R. Drug allergy. J Allergy Clin 2003;111(5):1133–6.
Immunol. 2010;125(2 Suppl 2):S126–37. 60. Spector S, Tan RA. Antileukotrienes in chronic
42. Doeglas HM. Reactions to aspirin and food additives urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;101(4 Pt
in patients with chronic urticaria, including the physi- 1):572.
cal urticarias. Br J Dermatol. 1975;93(2):135–44. 61. Smith PF, Corelli RL. Doxepin in the management of
43. Sanchez-Borges M. NSAID hypersensitivity (respira- pruritus associated with allergic cutaneous reactions.
tory, cutaneous, and generalized anaphylactic symp- Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31(5):633–5.
toms). Med Clin North Am. 2010;94(4):853–64. xiii. 62. Asero R, Tedeschi A. Usefulness of a short course of
44. An SY, et al. Vancomycin-associated spontaneous oral prednisone in antihistamine-resistant chronic
cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Allergy Asthma urticaria: a retrospective analysis. J Investig Allergol
Immunol Res. 2011;3(3):194–8. Clin Immunol. 2010;20(5):386–90.
45 Polk RE, et al. Vancomycin and the red-man syn- 63. Buchman AL. Side effects of corticosteroid therapy.
drome: pharmacodynamics of histamine release. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33(4):289–94.
J Infect Dis. 1988;157(3):502–7. 64. Di Leo E, et al. Cyclosporin-A efficacy in chronic
46. Renz C, et al. Histamine release during rapid vancomy- idiopathic urticaria. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol.
cin administration. Inflamm Res. 1998;47(13):69–70. 2011;24(1):195–200.
82 A. Rosen et al.
65. Grattan CE, et al. Randomized double-blind study of to the intramuscular tissues. Ann Allergy Asthma
cyclosporin in chronic ‘idiopathic’ urticaria. Br J Immunol. 2005;94(5):539–42.
Dermatol. 2000;143(2):365–72. 81. Stecher D, et al. Epinephrine auto-injectors: is needle
66. Vena GA, et al. Cyclosporine in chronic idiopathic length adequate for delivery of epinephrine intramus-
urticaria: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-con- cularly? Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):65–70.
trolled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(4):705–9. 82. Pumphrey RS. Fatal posture in anaphylactic shock.
67. Stellato C, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(2):451–2.
cyclosporin A on human skin mast cells. J Invest 83 Sicherer SH, Simons FE. Quandaries in prescribing
Dermatol. 1992;98(5):800–4. an emergency action plan and self-injectable epineph-
68. Harvey RP, Wegs J, Schocket AL. A controlled trial of rine for first-aid management of anaphylaxis in the
therapy in chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. community. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(3):
1981;68(4):262–6. 575–83.
69. Cassano N, et al. Low-dose dapsone in chronic idio- 84. Soar J, et al. Emergency treatment of anaphylactic
pathic urticaria: preliminary results of an open study. reactions–guidelines for healthcare providers.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(3):254–5. Resuscitation. 2008;77(2):157–69.
70. Engin B, Ozdemir M. Prospective randomized non- 85. Mueller UR. Cardiovascular disease and anaphylaxis.
blinded clinical trial on the use of dapsone plus anti- Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;7(4):337–41.
histamine vs. antihistamine in patients with chronic 86. Arock M, Valent P. Pathogenesis, classification and
idiopathic urticaria. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. treatment of mastocytosis: state of the art in 2010
2008;22(4):481–6. and future perspectives. Expert Rev Hematol.
71. Chakravarty SD, Yee AF, Paget SA. Rituximab suc- 2010;3(4):497–516.
cessfully treats refractory chronic autoimmune urti- 87. Tharp MD. Mastocytosis. In: Bolognia J, Jorizzo JL,
caria caused by IgE receptor autoantibodies. J Allergy Rapini RP, editors. Dermatology. St. Louis, Mo:
Clin Immunol. 2011;128(6):1354–5. Mosby; 2008.
72. Maurer M, et al. Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in 88. Wedi B, Frieri M. Mastocytosis. In: Mahmoudi M,
patients with chronic urticaria who exhibit IgE against editor. Challenging cases in allergy and immunology.
thyroperoxidase. J Allergy Clin Immunol. London: Humana Press; 2009. p. 193–212.
2011;128(1):202.e5–9. 89. Valent P, et al. Standards and standardization in mas-
73. Saini S, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled, tocytosis: consensus statements on diagnostics, treat-
dose-ranging study of single-dose omalizumab in ment recommendations and response criteria. Eur
patients with H1-antihistamine-refractory chronic J Clin Invest. 2007;37(6):435–53.
idiopathic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 90. Valent P, et al. Diagnosis and classification of mast
2011;128(3):567.e1–73. cell proliferative disorders: delineation from immuno-
74. Sagi L, et al. Evidence for methotrexate as a useful logic diseases and non-mast cell hematopoietic neo-
treatment for steroid-dependent chronic urticaria. plasms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114(1):3–11.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2011;91(3):303–6. quiz 12.
75. Kemp SF, Lockey RF, Simons FE. Epinephrine: the 91. Briley LD, Phillips CM. Cutaneous mastocytosis: a
drug of choice for anaphylaxis. A statement of the review focusing on the pediatric population. Clin
World Allergy Organization. Allergy. 2008;63(8): Pediatr. 2008;47(8):757–61.
1061–70. 92. Lim KH, et al. Systemic mastocytosis in 342 consecu-
76. Simons FE, et al. Epinephrine absorption in children tive adults: survival studies and prognostic factors.
with a history of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Blood. 2009;113(23):5727–36.
1998;101(1 Pt 1):33–7. 93. Castells M, Metcalfe DD, Escribano L. Diagnosis and
77. Simons KJ, Simons FE. Epinephrine and its use in treatment of cutaneous mastocytosis in children: prac-
anaphylaxis: current issues. Curr Opin Allergy Clin tical recommendations. Am J Clin Dermatol.
Immunol. 2010;10(4):354–61. 2011;12(4):259–70.
78. Pumphrey R. When should self-injectible epinephrine 94. George TI, Horny HP. Systemic mastocytosis.
be prescribed for food allergy and when should it be Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2011;25(5):
used? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 1067–83.
2008;8(3):254–60. 95. Longley Jr BJ, et al. Activating and dominant inacti-
79. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. High body mass vating c-KIT catalytic domain mutations in distinct
index for age among US children and adolescents, clinical forms of human mastocytosis. Proc Natl Acad
2003–2006. JAMA. 2008;299(20):2401–5. Sci USA. 1999;96(4):1609–14.
80. Song TT, et al. Adequacy of the epinephrine 96. Heide R, Tank B, Oranje AP. Mastocytosis in child-
autoinjector needle length in delivering epinephrine hood. Pediatr Dermatol. 2002;19(5):375–81.
Cutaneous Emergencies in the
HIV-Positive Patient 5
Markus Boos, Karolyn Wanat, and James Treat
The worldwide morbidity and mortality asso- Table 5.1 Constellation of symptoms associated with
ciated with the AIDS epidemic are substantial, acute HIV infection
and as such, a significant public health effort has Constitutional Fever, fatigue, headache, night
been initiated to control both the spread of HIV sweats
and the progression of disease within infected Dermatologic Morbilliform eruption of upper
trunk composed of pink-red
individuals. HIV is transmitted through contact macules
with blood, vaginal secretions, or semen of an Mucocutaneous change: Anal,
infected individual. Transmission most often gential, oropharyngeal ulcers
occurs through sexual intercourse (including oral Gastrointestinal Sore throat, nausea, vomiting,
sex), IV drug use, or via vertical mother-to-child diarrhea
transmission in the womb or during the perinatal Musculoskeletal Arthralgias, myalgias
period [2, 8]. HIV can also be transmitted via Hematologic Lymphadenopathy, lymphopenia,
thrombocytopenia
blood transfusion, though improved screening
Additionally, patients should have a history of probable
measures make this mode of transmission increas-
antecedent exposure in the preceding 2–4 weeks: either
ingly rare. risky sexual behavior or IV drug use
5.2 Primary HIV Infection The eruption may resemble a primary roseola exan-
thema. The macules that compose this rash are typi-
The acute manifestations of primary HIV infec- cally non-confluent, range in size from 4 to 10 mm,
tion are nonspecific, and a high degree of suspi- and are pink or red in color [10, 13]. Notably, the
cion is required to establish the proper diagnosis. exanthem is not painful, rarely pruritic, and usually
Since early diagnosis and treatment of HIV can disappears within 1–2 weeks, occasionally inducing
help prevent serious sequelae in the source patient a fine desquamation as it resolves [5, 10, 12, 13].
and further dissemination of HIV to sexual con- The histologic features of the rash are also
tacts, it is considered here as an emergency. nonspecific and mimic various viral and drug reac-
Symptomatic primary HIV infection has been tions; an absence of epidermal change and a sparse
described as “mononucleosis-like” and most dermal perivascular infiltrate composed mainly of
often presents with fever, fatigue, and rash lymphocytes and histiocytes is seen. Other skin
between 2 and 4 weeks after exposure [9–11]. findings that have been reported in association with
Additionally, symptoms such as sore throat, primary HIV infection include a papulopustular and
lymphadenopathy, headache, arthralgias, myal- vesicular exanthem, urticaria, and desquamation of
gias, night sweats, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea the palms and soles [7, 11, 15].
are not uncommon [2, 9–11]. Hematologic abnor- In addition to its characteristic rash, the der-
malities including lymphopenia and thrombocy- matologic findings common to primary HIV
topenia are frequently seen on laboratory infection include mucocutaneous change.
evaluation (Table 5.1) [2, 5, 12]. Any patient who Specifically, anal and genital ulcers, as well as
presents with this constellation of signs and ulceration of the esophagus, buccal mucosa, pal-
symptoms therefore warrants a detailed sexual ate, and gingiva, have been reported in the absence
and drug use history, as well as a thorough physi- of any other infectious causes [10, 12]. These
cal exam to assist in the early diagnosis of new characteristic ulcers have been described as
HIV infection. 5–10 mm, round to oval in shape, with a white
The most common cutaneous manifestation of base surrounded by a red rim [10]. Enanthema of
primary HIV infection (estimated to occur in up the soft and hard palates have also been noted
to 80% of new infections) is a macular or morbilli- [10, 12, 14]. Lymphadenopathy is another visible
form eruption that is localized primarily on the early manifestation of acute HIV infection; it
upper trunk, but may also include the neck, face, appears most prominently during resolution of
extremities, scalp, palms, and soles [2, 8, 10, 13, 14]. the acute syndrome [2, 9].
5 Cutaneous Emergencies in the HIV-Positive Patient 85
against infection, should be initiated when pressed although typically scabies, even in severely
beginning immunosuppressant therapy. immunosuppressed patients, spares the face.
The pathogenesis of EF remains unknown,
though it is thought to occur secondary to the
5.3.2 Eosinophilic Folliculitis skewing of the immune system toward a Th2
phenotype in the context of extreme immunosup-
Eosinophilic folliculitis (EF) is an extremely pru- pression and immune dysregulation. Many com-
ritic, follicular-based eruption of erythematous mon environmental antigens, including skin flora
papules that is most commonly seen in HIV+ and medications, have been suggested to potenti-
patients with low CD4 counts [26–28]. It has ate a hypersensitivity reaction that leads to the
been reported as the primary presentation of HIV clinical appearance of EF.
but more commonly serves to identify patients at Treatment of EF is challenging, and no con-
risk for severe opportunistic infections. The pres- sensus exists on the optimal treatment for this
ence of EF therefore indicates that urgent inter- condition. Of foremost importance is the initia-
vention is required to identify and/or treat an tion of HAART, which, though it may potentiate
associated HIV infection [29]. The characteristic EF when initiated in those with low CD4 cell
lesions of EF are 3–5 mm papules located pri- counts, ultimately helps resolve the condition by
marily on the upper trunk, head, neck, and proxi- restoring normal immune system function [27,
mal extremities that are often excoriated or 30, 32]. Among other therapeutic modalities,
crusted as a result of associated pruritus [27–29]. UVB therapy two to three times per week appears
Rarely, EF can present as erythematous plaques to most reliably provide improvement within 3–6
or urticaria [30]. A relative peripheral eosino- weeks, though weekly maintenance treatments
philia and elevated IgE levels may also be noted are usually required [32]. High-potency topical
on laboratory studies [28]. The condition has a steroids applied twice daily may also be effective,
stark male predominance and has rarely been but given their side effects of skin atrophy, hypop-
reported in women [27–29]. Interestingly, EF is igmentation, and telangiectasias, an effective
associated with CD4 cell counts less than 250/mL; alternative topical therapy such as tacrolimus may
however, the initiation of HAART also appears to be a better option [28, 33]. Systemic therapies
be a trigger of EF in these same patients [26, 27]. including itraconazole (begun at 200 mg/day),
This tends to occur between 3 and 6 months after metronidazole (250 mg three times per day), and
initiating HAART [27]. isotretinoin (0.3–1 mg/kg/day) have also been
The differential diagnosis for EF includes used to treat EF, with varying degrees of success
multiple pruritic dermatoses such as scabies, [32]. Symptomatic control of pruritus can be
papular urticaria, dermatitis herpetiformis, achieved by using antihistamines such as cetiriz-
arthropod assault, and bacterial folliculitis [31]. ine or doxepin, as well as through the application
In order to establish a diagnosis, skin biopsy of a of topical lotions containing menthol [31, 32].
papule is often helpful, though care must be taken
to section the specimen appropriately so that an
involved follicle can be evaluated. Histologic 5.4 Infectious Complications
examination reveals a mixed perivascular or peri- of HIV Infection
follicular infiltrate of eosinophils and lympho-
cytes with occasional neutrophils, often with Given the global immunosuppression associated
rupture of the associated sebaceous gland [26, with HIV infection and the depletion of CD4+ T
28, 30]. Notably, infectious organisms are absent helper cells, patients who are HIV+ are at an
on both H&E and special stain examinations. increased risk of both common and opportunistic
A scabies preparation is also helpful to exclude infections. The most common and life-threatening
this condition in patients who are immunosup- infections are discussed below.
88 M. Boos et al.
involvement of the skin is not uncommon [43, 44]. tory cases or for esophageal involvement when
Disseminated infections are rare in HIV-associated systemic therapy is indicated [43–45]. Cutaneous
Candida in part due to a relatively more functional candidiasis is typically responsive to Nystatin or
humoral immune system [43]. Candida infections topical azoles including ketoconazole or clotri-
present at moderate-to-advanced stages of HIV mazole [43].
infection (with CD4 cell counts <200–300/mL),
and often signify progressive disease and poor
clinical outcomes [17, 43, 45]. 5.6.2 Cryptococcus and Other Invasive
There are four main manifestations of oropha- Fungal Infections
ryngeal candidiasis: pseudomembranous, ery-
thematous/atrophic and hyperplastic forms, as Infection with the encapsulated yeast Cryptococcus
well as angular cheilitis [43]. Pseudomembranous neoformans is a common occurrence in patients
oral candidiasis (OC) presents as creamy white with AIDS, occurring in between 6 and 13 % of
plaques present on multiple oropharyngeal sur- patients, typically with CD4 cell counts below
faces, including the tongue, palate, and buccal 200/mL [4, 47]. Cryptococcal infection occurs fol-
mucosa; these lesions can be easily scraped away. lowing inhalation of the organism, which is found
Erythematous and atrophic lesions are common in in soil or grass contaminated with pigeon drop-
older patients with HIV and present as red ulcers pings; from this primary pulmonary focus, the
and erosions; they can often be found under oral organism can disseminate hematogenously [47,
accessories such as dentures [45]. The hyperplas- 48]. Most often this dissemination manifests as
tic form and angular cheilitis are far less common meningitis associated with central nervous system
and appear as thick yellow plaques or erythema involvement, but cutaneous involvement occurs in
and painful fissuring at the angles of the mouth, approximately 6–20 % of patients with dissemi-
respectively. Patients with active oral Candida nated disease, as well [4, 47]. Primary cutaneous
infections may note altered taste, and complaints disease secondary to external inoculation is over-
of pain on swallowing should alert the physician whelmingly rare [47].
to potential esophageal involvement, as well [45]. The primary lesions of cutaneous cryptococ-
Vulvovaginitis, enteritis, and gastritis are also cal disease are protean in appearance, but most
possible mucocutaneous manifestations of often present as umbilicated papules and nodules,
Candida infection [43]. Cutaneous candidiasis is often with a central hemorrhagic crust [4, 49].
marked by pink-red, thin plaques and patches Other potential morphologies include violaceous
with surrounding satellite pustules, found most and crusted papules, plaques and nodules, scaly
commonly in skin folds, including the groin, plaques, and less commonly ulcers or draining
inframammary, and axillary regions [43]. sinuses [4, 47]. These lesions occur primarily on
The diagnosis of candidiasis is often a clinical the face and neck, though involvement of the
one, though KOH preparations demonstrating extremities and trunk also occurs at a reduced
budding yeast and pseudohyphae, fungal culture, frequency [4]. The differential diagnosis of these
and biochemical tests can aid in diagnosis when lesions includes molluscum contagiosum,
uncertainty exists [43, 45]. In adults, treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, and
oral candidiasis can be achieved by administering nummular eczema [4, 47]. Identification of an
oral fluconazole at a dose of 100–200 mg/day antecedent flu-like illness or symptoms indicat-
until the patient has remained asymptomatic for ing multi-organ system involvement, such as
1–2 weeks; alternatively, a single dose of 750 mg neurologic changes or pulmonary symptoms,
can be given [46]. Clotrimazole troches and nys- may assist the astute dermatologist in making the
tatin solution are other topical alternatives for correct diagnosis of cryptococcal infection.
treatment of oral candidiasis, while itraconazole, Diagnosis can easily be established on biopsy
voriconazole, or posaconazole can be used as with routine histology. Two primary histopathologic
alternatives to fluconazole in unusually refrac- appearances manifest in the case of cryptococcal
90 M. Boos et al.
infection: granulomatous or gelatinous, though and rosacea, and even ulcers have all been
individual biopsy specimens can also exhibit an reported in association with histoplasmosis [51].
overlap of these two patterns. In the granulomatous Oral manifestations are also common, presenting
form, multiple histiocytes can be seen phagocytiz- most often as painful ulcerations or granuloma-
ing budding yeast that are surrounded by clear halos. tous lesions [52]. Blastomycosis can also present
The gelatinous form exhibits fungal organisms sur- in a variety of forms, including papules, pustules,
rounded by a pool of mucin. These organisms can ulcers, and granulomatous masses [53, 54].
be found in a variety of distributions, from subepi- Similarly, cutaneous coccidiomycosis manifests
dermal foci to involvement of the entire dermis [4]. typically on the face as papules, pustules, or nod-
PAS stains may aid in identification of encapsulated ules. If given time to expand and coalesce, these
yeast organisms. In instances where the diagnosis lesions can eventually transform into abscesses,
remains in question despite biopsy, other methods ulcers, and verrucous or scarred plaques [51].
of identification can be used including culture on Given the nonspecific nature of these cutaneous
Sabouraud dextrose agar or identification of crypto- findings and the considerable overlap in presenta-
coccal capsular polysaccharide antigen in serum tion between the various fungal organisms, these
[47, 49]. Microscopic or serologic examination of species must always be considered in HIV+
cerebrospinal fluid may also help in establishing the patients who present with any of the aforemen-
diagnosis in patients with concomitant meningitis tioned cutaneous findings. Biopsy and serologic
or neurologic symptoms [49]. testing are indicated to quickly establish the
Treatment of disseminated cryptococcal infec- appropriate diagnosis [50]. Treatment of all of
tion in immunocompromised patients includes these organisms should be guided by an infec-
intravenous amphotericin B; adjunct therapy with tious disease specialist but typically begins with
fluconazole or flucytosine is often administered. amphotericin B, with azole therapy (typically
Lifelong prophylactic therapy is subsequently with itraconazole or fluconazole) initiated after
indicated, most often with daily oral fluconazole. clinical stabilization. Patients subsequently require
Although less common, infection with other lifelong prophylaxis to prevent recurrence [48, 50].
invasive fungi such as Histoplasma capsulatum
(histoplasmosis), Blastomyces dermatitidis (blas-
tomycosis), and Coccidioides immitis (coccidio- 5.6.3 Cutaneous Bacterial Infections
mycosis) must also be considered in HIV+ that Can Be Emergencies
patients with cutaneous manifestations, espe-
cially those who live in or have recently traveled 5.6.3.1 Staphylococcus aureus
to endemic areas. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Histoplasmosis is found primarily in the Ohio (MRSA) is a rapidly emerging pathogen that has
and Mississippi River valleys, blastomycosis in a higher prevalence of both colonization and skin
the Midwest and southeastern United States, and and soft tissue infection in people infected with
coccidiomycosis is most common in the south- HIV. MRSA colonization is more highly associ-
western United States [50]. For all of these dis- ated with HIV-infected patients who have low
eases, infection occurs primarily after inhalation CD4 counts, are intravenous drug users, and in
and by entry through the lungs; cutaneous mani- men who have sex with men [55–58].
festation therefore represents disseminated disease Staphylococcus aureus presents in the skin most
in the majority of patients, as primary cutaneous frequently with folliculitis or furunculosis and
disease secondary to inoculation is rare [48, 50]. can lead to more severe systemic infection.
Like Cryptococcus, cutaneous histoplasmosis Although folliculitis and furunculosis are rarely
often presents on the face, and has a protean emergencies, given the risk of bacteremia and
appearance. Red macules, necrotic papules, nod- internal abscesses, it is important to identify and
ules and pustules, eruptions reminiscent of acne treat cutaneous MRSA infections in HIV patients.
5 Cutaneous Emergencies in the HIV-Positive Patient 91
but should be guided by an experienced infec- Table 5.2 Medications reported to cause a serious drug
tious disease specialist. reaction in the setting of HIV
Abacavir
5.6.3.7 Molluscum Contagiosum Amprenavir
Molluscum contagiosum is caused by a DNA Atazanavir
pox virus and most typically manifests as small Didanosine
flesh colored papules with central umbilica- Indinavir
Isoniazid/rifampin combination therapy
tion. Although molluscum is not a life-threat-
Nevirapine
ening infection, the virus can overgrow
Ritonavir-boosted darunavir
extensively in HIV patients. This overgrowth
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX)
can lead to nodular lesions which can obstruct
Zidovudine
vision and become purulent and disfiguring
[72]. Exuberant molluscum inflammation can
also be a manifestation of immune reconstitu- epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug hypersensitiv-
tion inflammatory syndrome (IRIS, discussed ity syndrome (DHS) or drug reaction with eosino-
later in this chapter). philia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and
Viral infections can also be a precursor lesion acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis
to carcinomatous change. Chronic infection with (AGEP). There are a few clinical signs and symp-
human papillomavirus (HPV) infection that is toms which can alert the clinician that one of
recalcitrant to therapy and exuberant should raise these serious drug reactions might be occurring:
suspicion for transition to verrucous carcinoma. high fever, skin pain, mucous membrane involve-
Biopsy should be performed in immunosup- ment, facial swelling, and internal organ involve-
pressed patients with especially recalcitrant ment suggested by laboratory abnormalities.
warts, especially around the perineum. Table 5.2 provides a list of common medications
used in the setting of HIV that may cause a seri-
ous drug reaction, including antiretrovirals and
5.6.4 Drug Reactions antibiotic regimens.
culture can be performed if the timing of the drug In summary, it is important for clinicians to
reaction (patient has been on a medication for have a high index of suspicion when HIV-positive
several years) or clinical scenario of mucosal pre- patients present with cutaneous drug eruptions.
dominant involvement, preceding cough and Clues to a potentially serious underlying drug
shortness of breath, or other information suggests reaction include high fever, skin pain, facial
an alternate diagnosis [91, 92, 98]. Treatment of swelling and lymphadenopathy, and mucous
SJS/TEN is discussed in detail in other chapters. membrane involvement. General laboratory tests
should be obtained to evaluate for underlying
internal organ involvement. If a serious drug
5.6.7 Acute Generalized reaction is suspected, immediate cessation of the
Exanthematous Pustulosis culprit medication is essential.
opportunistic infections by IRIS. For less 10. Lapins J, Gaines H, Lindback S, Lidbrink P,
dangerous dermatologic manifestations, general Emtestam L. Skin and mucosal characteristics of
symptomatic primary HIV-1 infection. AIDS Patient
treatment guidelines as previously outlined in Care STDS. 1997;11(2):67–70.
this chapter can be used. 11. Cooper DA, Gold J, Maclean P, et al. Acute AIDS
retrovirus infection. Definition of a clinical illness
associated with seroconversion. Lancet.
1985;1(8428):537–40.
5.7 Summary 12. Hulsebosch HJ, Claessen FA, van Ginkel CJ, Kuiters
GR, Goudsmit J, Lange JM. Human immunodeficiency
In conclusion, there are many cutaneous manifes- virus exanthem. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;23(3 Pt
tations of HIV and AIDS. Clinicians should be 1):483–6.
13. Balslev E, Thomsen HK, Weismann K.
able to recognize and treat HIV early to prevent Histopathology of acute human immunodeficiency
both serious illnesses and transmission. The cuta- virus exanthema. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43(3):201–2.
neous manifestations of HIV are often the most 14. Wantzin GR, Lindhardt BO, Weismann K, Ulrich K.
clinically evident since they can be seen easily. Acute HTLV III infection associated with exan-
thema, diagnosed by seroconversion. Br J Dermatol.
This chapter has reviewed the appearance of the 1986;115(5):601–6.
initial eruption, dermatoses, infections, malig- 15. Calabrese LH, Proffitt MR, Levin KH, Yen-
nancies, and inflammatory reactions that should Lieberman B, Starkey C. Acute infection with the
alert the clinician to recognize undiagnosed HIV human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) associated
with acute brachial neuritis and exanthematous rash.
as well as provide appropriate management in Ann Intern Med. 1987;107(6):849–51.
patients with known infection. 16. Daar ES, Little S, Pitt J, et al. Diagnosis of primary
HIV-1 infection. Los Angeles County Primary HIV
Infection Recruitment Network. Ann Intern Med.
2001;134(1):25–9.
References 17. Thompson MA, Aberg JA, Cahn P, et al. Antiretroviral
treatment of adult HIV infection: 2010 recommen-
1. Murray PR, Rosenthal KS, Pfaller MA. Medical dations of the International AIDS Society-USA
microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby/Elsevier; panel. JAMA. 2010;304(3):321–33.
2009. 18. Mallon E, Bunker CB. HIV-associated psoriasis.
2. Kahn JO, Walker BD. Acute human immunodeficiency AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2000;14(5):239–46.
virus type 1 infection. N Engl J Med. 19. Morar N, Willis-Owen SA, Maurer T, Bunker CB.
1998;339(1):33–9. HIV-associated psoriasis: pathogenesis, clinical fea-
3. Gorry PR, Ancuta P. Coreceptors and HIV-1 patho- tures, and management. Lancet Infect Dis.
genesis. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2011;8(1):45–53. 2010;10(7):470–8.
4. Murakawa GJ, Kerschmann R, Berger T. Cutaneous 20. Duvic M, Johnson TM, Rapini RP, Freese T, Brewton
Cryptococcus infection and AIDS. Report of 12 G, Rios A. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-
cases and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol. associated psoriasis and Reiter’s syndrome. Arch
1996;132(5):545–8. Dermatol. 1987;123(12):1622–32.
5. Quinn TC, Brookmeyer R, Kline R, et al. Feasibility 21. Obuch ML, Maurer TA, Becker B, Berger TG.
of pooling sera for HIV-1 viral RNA to diagnose Psoriasis and human immunodeficiency virus infec-
acute primary HIV-1 infection and estimate HIV tion. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27(5 Pt 1):667–73.
incidence. AIDS. 2000;14(17):2751–7. 22. Wolfer LU, Djemadji-Oudjiel N, Hiletework M,
6. Horsburgh Jr CR, Ou CY, Jason J, et al. Duration of et al. HIV-associated psoriasis. Clinical and histo-
human immunodeficiency virus infection before logical observations in 36 patients. Hautarzt.
detection of antibody. Lancet. 1989;2(8664): 637–40. 1998;49(3):197–202.
7. Ho DD, Sarngadharan MG, Resnick L, 23. Reveille JD, Conant MA, Duvic M. Human
Dimarzoveronese F, Rota TR, Hirsch MS. Primary immunodeficiency virus-associated psoriasis, psori-
human T-lymphotropic virus type III infection. Ann atic arthritis, and Reiter’s syndrome: a disease con-
Intern Med. 1985;103(6 Pt 1):880–3. tinuum? Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33(10):1574–8.
8. Schacker T, Collier AC, Hughes J, Shea T, Corey L. 24. Colebunders R, Blot K, Mertens V, Dockx P.
Clinical and epidemiologic features of primary HIV Psoriasis regression in terminal AIDS. Lancet.
infection. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(4):257–64. 1992;339(8801):1110.
9. Tindall B, Barker S, Donovan B, et al. Characterization 25. Menon K, Van Voorhees AS, Bebo Jr BF, et al.
of the acute clinical illness associated with human Psoriasis in patients with HIV infection: from the
immunodeficiency virus infection. Arch Intern Med. medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.
1988;148(4):945–9. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(2):291–9.
98 M. Boos et al.
26. Nervi SJ, Schwartz RA, Dmochowski M. 42. Taylor CR, Bailey EM. Red nodule on the forearm of
Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis: a 40 year retro- an HIV-positive man. Isolated cutaneous
spect. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(2):285–9. Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infection. Arch
27. Rajendran PM, Dolev JC, Heaphy Jr MR, Maurer T. Dermatol. 1998;134(10):1279–80. 1282-1273.
Eosinophilic folliculitis: before and after the intro- 43. Durden FM, Elewski B. Fungal infections in HIV-
duction of antiretroviral therapy. Arch Dermatol. infected patients. Semin Cutan Med Surg.
2005;141(10):1227–31. 1997;16(3):200–12.
28. Rosenthal D, LeBoit PE, Klumpp L, Berger TG. 44. Johnson NW. The mouth in HIV/AIDS: markers of
Human immunodeficiency virus-associated eosino- disease status and management challenges for the den-
philic folliculitis. A unique dermatosis associated tal profession. Aust Dent J. 2010;55 Suppl 1:85–102.
with advanced human immunodeficiency virus 45. Thompson 3rd GR, Patel PK, Kirkpatrick WR, et al.
infection. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(2):206–9. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in the era of antiretroviral
29. Basarab T, Russell Jones R. HIV-associated eosino- therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
philic folliculitis: case report and review of the liter- Endod. 2010;109(4):488–95.
ature. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134(3):499–503. 46. Single-Dose Fluconazole versus Standard 2-Week
30. Fearfield LA, Rowe A, Francis N, Bunker CB, Therapy for Oropharyngeal Candidiasis in HIV-
Staughton RC. Itchy folliculitis and human Infected Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind,
immunodeficiency virus infection: clinicopathologi- Double-Dummy Trial Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(10):
cal and immunological features, pathogenesis and 1270–6.
treatment. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141(1):3–11. 47. Dharmshale SN, Patil SA, Gohil A, Chowdhary A,
31. Porras B, Costner M, Friedman-Kien AE, Cockerell Oberoi C. Disseminated crytococcosis with exten-
CJ. Update on cutaneous manifestations of HIV infec- sive cutaneous involvement in AIDS. Indian J Med
tion. Med Clin North Am. 1998;82(5):1033–80. v. Microbiol. 2006;24(3):228–30.
32. Ellis E, Scheinfeld N. Eosinophilic pustular follicu- 48. Ampel NM. Emerging disease issues and fungal
litis: a comprehensive review of treatment options. pathogens associated with HIV infection. Emerg
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004;5(3):189–97. Infect Dis. 1996;2(2):109–16.
33. Toutous-Trellu L, Abraham S, Pechere M, et al. Topical 49. Tuerlinckx D, Bodart E, Garrino MG, Weemaes G,
tacrolimus for effective treatment of eosinophilic folli- de Bilderling G. Cutaneous lesions of disseminated
culitis associated with human immunodeficiency virus cryptococcosis as the presenting manifestation of
infection. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(10):1203–8. human immunodeficiency virus infection in a twen-
34. Pimpin L, Drumright LN, Kruijshaar ME, et al. ty-two-month-old child. Pediatr Infect Dis J.
Tuberculosis and HIV co-infection in European 2001;20(4):463–4.
Union and European Economic Area countries. Eur 50. Sarosi GA, Davies DA. Endemic mycosis compli-
Respir J. 2011;38(6):1382–92. cating human immunodeficiency virus infection.
35. Elston JW, Thaker HK. Co-infection with human West J Med. 1996;164(4):335–40.
immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis. Indian J 51. Dover JS, Johnson RA. Cutaneous manifestations of
Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74(3):194–9. human immunodeficiency virus infection. Part II.
36. High WA, Evans CC, Hoang MP. Cutaneous miliary Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(10):1549–58.
tuberculosis in two patients with HIV infection. J 52. Economopoulou P, Laskaris G, Kittas C. Oral histo-
Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(5 Suppl):S110–3. plasmosis as an indicator of HIV infection. Oral
37. Oliva SM, Redini L, Bases OM, et al. Cutaneous Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.
tuberculosis in patients with AIDS. AIDS Patient 1998;86(2):203–6.
Care STDS. 1997;11(6):443–9. 53. Witzig RS, Hoadley DJ, Greer DL, Abriola KP,
38. Regnier S, Ouagari Z, Perez ZL, Veziris N, Bricaire Hernandez RL. Blastomycosis and human
F, Caumes E. Cutaneous miliary resistant tuberculo- immunodeficiency virus: three new cases and review.
sis in a patient infected with human immunodeficiency South Med J. 1994;87(7):715–9.
virus: case report and literature review. Clin Exp 54. Pappas PG, Pottage JC, Powderly WG, et al.
Dermatol. 2009;34(8):e690–2. Blastomycosis in patients with the acquired
39. Farina MC, Gegundez MI, Pique E, et al. Cutaneous immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Intern Med.
tuberculosis: a clinical, histopathologic, and bacte- 1992;116(10):847–53.
riologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33(3): 55. Imaz A, Pujol M, Barragan P, Dominguez MA,
433–40. Tiraboschi JM, Podzamczer D. Community associ-
40. Friedli A, Krischer J, Hirschel B, Saurat JH, Pechere ated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in
M. An annular plaque due to Mycobacterium hae- HIV-infected patients. AIDS Rev.
mophilum infection in a patient with AIDS. J Am 2010;12(3):153–63.
Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(5 Pt 2):913–5. 56. Shastry L, Rahimian J, Lascher S. Community-
41. Mitha M, Naicker P, Taljaard J. Cutaneous associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
Mycobacterium kansasii infection in a patient with aureus skin and soft tissue infections in men who
AIDS post initiation of antiretroviral therapy. J Infect have sex with men in New York City. Arch Intern
Dev Ctries. 2011;5(7):553–5. Med. 2007;167(8):854–7.
5 Cutaneous Emergencies in the HIV-Positive Patient 99
57. Sztramko R, Katz K, Antoniou T, et al. Community- 70. Chilek K, Routhouska S, Tamburro J. Disseminated
associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus varicella zoster virus in an immunized child as the
aureus infections in men who have sex with men: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining ill-
A case series. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. ness. Pediatr Dermatol. 2010;27(2):192–4.
2007;18(4):257–61. 71. Smith KJ, Skelton HG, Yeager J, Wagner KF.
58. Hidron AI, Kourbatova EV, Halvosa JS, et al. Risk Cutaneous thrombosis in human immunodeficiency
factors for colonization with methicillin-resistant virus type 1-positive patients and cytomegalovirus
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients admitted viremia. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(3):357–8.
to an urban hospital: emergence of community-asso- 72. Pereira B, Fernandes C, Nachiambo E, Catarino MC,
ciated MRSA nasal carriage. Clin Infect Dis. Rodrigues A, Cardoso J. Exuberant molluscum con-
2005;41(2):159–66. tagiosum as a manifestation of the immune reconsti-
59. Plettenberg A, Lorenzen T, Burtsche BT, et al. tution inflammatory syndrome. Dermatol Online J.
Bacillary angiomatosis in HIV-infected patients—an 2007;13(2):6.
epidemiological and clinical study. Dermatology. 73. Pirmohamed M, Park BK. HIV and drug allergy.
2000;201(4):326–31. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;1(4):311–6.
60. Hoey JG, Valois-Cruz F, Goldenberg H, et al. 74. Roujeau JC. Drug eruptions in HIV infection. Presse
Development of an immunoglobulin M capture- Med. 1994;23(3):111–2.
based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diag- 75. Roujeau JC, Stern RS. Severe adverse cutaneous reac-
nosis of acute infections with Bartonella henselae. tions to drugs. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(19):1272–85.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16(2):282–4. 76. Cacoub P, Musette P, Descamps V, et al. The DRESS
61. Biswas S, Rolain JM. Bartonella infection: treatment syndrome: a literature review. Am J Med.
and drug resistance. Future Microbiol. 2011;124(7):588–97.
2010;5(11):1719–31. 77. Cutrell AG, Hernandez JE, Fleming JW, et al.
62. Rompalo AM, Joesoef MR, O’Donnell JA, et al. Updated clinical risk factor analysis of suspected
Clinical manifestations of early syphilis by HIV sta- hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir. Ann
tus and gender: results of the syphilis and HIV study. Pharmacother. 2004;38(12):2171–2.
Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28(3):158–65. 78. Symonds W, Cutrell A, Edwards M, et al. Risk factor
63. Telzak EE, Chiasson MA, Bevier PJ, Stoneburner analysis of hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir.
RL, Castro KG, Jaffe HW. HIV-1 seroconversion in Clin Ther. 2002;24(4):565–73.
patients with and without genital ulcer disease. 79. Escaut L, Liotier JY, Albengres E, Cheminot N,
A prospective study. Ann Intern Med. Vittecoq D. Abacavir rechallenge has to be avoided
1993;119(12):1181–6. in case of hypersensitivity reaction. AIDS.
64. Plummer FA, Wainberg MA, Plourde P, et al. 1999;13(11):1419–20.
Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 80. Chirouze C, Hustache-Mathieu L, Rougeot C, et al.
(HIV-1) in genital ulcer exudate of HIV-1-infected Risk factors for Abacavir-induced hypersensibility
men by culture and gene amplification. J Infect Dis. syndrome in the “real world”. Pathol Biol (Paris).
1990;161(4):810–1. 2004;52(9):529–33.
65. Lukehart SA, Hook 3rd EW, Baker-Zander SA, 81. Shearer WT. HIV infection and AIDS. Prim Care.
Collier AC, Critchlow CW, Handsfield HH. Invasion 1998;25(4):759–74.
of the central nervous system by Treponema pal- 82. Roujeau JC, Revuz J. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: an
lidum: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Ann expanding field of knowledge. J Am Acad Dermatol.
Intern Med. 1988;109(11):855–62. 1994;31(2 Pt 1):301–2.
66. Zellan J, Augenbraun M. Syphilis in the HIV- 83. French LE. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens
infected patient: an update on epidemiology, diagno- Johnson syndrome: our current understanding.
sis, and management. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. Allergol Int. 2006;55(1):9–16.
2004;1(3):142–7. 84. Roujeau JC. The spectrum of Stevens-Johnson syn-
67. Chidzonga MM, Mahomva L. Recurrent noma (can- drome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a clinical
crum oris) in human immunodeficiency virus infec- classification. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;102(6):
tion and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV 28S–30.
and AIDS): report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 85. Saiag P, Caumes E, Chosidow O, Revuz J, Roujeau
2008;66(8):1726–30. JC. Drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (Lyell
68. Siegal FP, Lopez C, Hammer GS, et al. Severe syndrome) in patients infected with the human
acquired immunodeficiency in male homosexuals, immunodeficiency virus. J Am Acad Dermatol.
manifested by chronic perianal ulcerative herpes sim- 1992;26(4):567–74.
plex lesions. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(24): 1439–44. 86. Knobel H, Miro JM, Domingo P, et al. Failure of a
69. Stewart JA, Reef SE, Pellett PE, Corey L, Whitley short-term prednisone regimen to prevent nevirap-
RJ. Herpesvirus infections in persons infected with ine-associated rash: a double-blind placebo-con-
human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. trolled trial: the GESIDA 09/99 study. J Acquir
1995;21 Suppl 1:S114–20. Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;28(1):14–8.
100 M. Boos et al.
87. Knobel H, Miro JM, Mahillo B, et al. Failure of ceti- patient. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(9):
rizine to prevent nevirapine-associated rash: a dou- 2188–9.
ble-blind placebo-controlled trial for the GESIDA 101. Ghosn J, Duvivier C, Tubiana R, Katlama C, Caumes
26/01 Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. E. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis
2004;37(2):1276–81. induced by HIV postexposure prophylaxis with lopi-
88. Rotunda A, Hirsch RJ, Scheinfeld N, Weinberg JM. navir-ritonavir. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(9):1360–1.
Severe cutaneous reactions associated with the use 102. Aquilina C, Viraben R, Roueire A. Acute general-
of human immunodeficiency virus medications. Acta ized exanthematous pustulosis: a cutaneous adverse
Derm Venereol. 2003;83(1):1–9. effect due to prophylactic antiviral therapy with pro-
89. Gimnig JE, MacArthur JR. M’Bang’ombe M, et al. tease inhibitor. Arch Intern Med.
Severe cutaneous reactions to sulfadoxine- 1998;158(19):2160–1.
pyrimethamine and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 103. Harr T, French LE. Severe cutaneous adverse reac-
in Blantyre District, Malawi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. tions: acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis,
2006;74(5):738–43. toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson
90. Kouassi B, Horo K, Vilasco B, et al. Lyell’s syn- syndrome. Med Clin North Am. 2010;94(4):
drome occurring in three HIV-positive patients 727–42. x.
undergoing anti-tuberculous therapy. Rev Mal 104. Chaponda M, Pirmohamed M. Hypersensitivity
Respir. 2010;27(3):247–50. reactions to HIV therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol.
91. Ravin KA, Rappaport LD, Zuckerbraun NS, 2011;71(5):659–71.
Wadowsky RM, Wald ER, Michaels MM. 105. Dolev J, Reyter I, Maurer T. Treatment of recurring
Mycoplasma pneumoniae and atypical Stevens- cutaneous drug reactions in patients with human
Johnson syndrome: a case series. Pediatrics. immunodeficiency virus 1 infection: a series of 3
2007;119(4):e1002–5. cases. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(9):1051–3.
92. Meyer Sauteur PM, Gansser-Kalin U, Lautenschlager 106. Spagnuolo V, Galli L, Salpietro S, et al. Ten-year
S, Goetschel P. Fuchs syndrome associated with survival among HIV-1 infected subjects with AIDS-
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Stevens-Johnson syn- or non-AIDS-defining malignancies. Int J Cancer.
drome without skin lesions). Pediatr Dermatol. 2012;130(12):2990–6.
2011;28(4):474–6. 107. Wilkins K, Dolev JC, Turner R, LeBoit PE, Berger
93. Tsai V, Oman J. Stevens-Johnson syndrome after TG, Maurer TA. Approach to the treatment of cuta-
Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. J Emerg Med. neous malignancy in HIV-infected patients. Dermatol
2011;40(3):324–7. Ther. 2005;18(1):77–86.
94. Strom J. Herpes simplex virus as a cause of allergic 108. Casper C. The increasing burden of HIV-associated
mucocutaneous reactions (ectodermosis erosiva malignancies in resource-limited regions. Annu Rev
pluriorificialis, Stevens-Johnson’s syndrome, etc.) Med. 2011;62:157–70.
and generalized infection. Scand J Infect Dis. 109. Martellotta F, Berretta M, Vaccher E, Schioppa O,
1969;1(1):3–10. Zanet E, Tirelli U. AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma:
95. Detjen PF, Patterson R, Noskin GA, Phair JP, Loyd state of the art and therapeutic strategies. Curr HIV
SO. Herpes simplex virus associated with recurrent Res. 2009;7(6):634–8.
Stevens-Johnson syndrome. A management strategy. 110. Arkin LM, Cox CM, Kovarik CL. Kaposi’s sarcoma
Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(7):1513–6. in the pediatric population: the critical need for a tis-
96. Golden HE. Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated sue diagnosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J.
with herpes simplex virus. Arch Intern Med. 2009;28(5):426–8.
1993;153(11):1396. 111. Mesri EA, Cesarman E, Boshoff C. Kaposi’s sar-
97. Cheriyan S, Patterson R. Recurrent Stevens-Johnson coma and its associated herpesvirus. Nat Rev Cancer.
syndrome secondary to herpes simplex: a follow up 2010;10(10):707–19.
on a successful management program. Allergy 112. Stebbing J, Mazhar D, Lewis R, et al. The presenta-
Asthma Proc. 1996;17(2):71–3. tion and survival of patients with non-cutaneous
98. Manwani NS, Balasubramanian S, Dhanalakshmi K, AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. Ann Oncol.
Sumanth A. Stevens Johnson Syndrome in 2006;17(3):503–6.
Association with Mycoplasma Pneumonia. Indian J 113. Clayton G, Omasta-Martin A, Bower M. The effects
Pediatr. 2011. of HAART on AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma and
99. Peermohamed AR, Shafar J. Sustained azathioprine- non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J HIV Ther.
induced remission in Wegener’s granulomatosis. Br 2006;11(3):51–3.
Med J. 1969;4(5683):600–1. 114. Nasti G, Martellotta F, Berretta M, et al. Impact of
100. Bourkia M, Charles L, Lambotte O, Orostegui-Giron highly active antiretroviral therapy on the presenting
L, Goujard C, Ghosn J. Life-threatening acute gener- features and outcome of patients with acquired
alized exanthematous pustulosis induced by two dif- immunodeficiency syndrome-related Kaposi sar-
ferent protease inhibitors in an HIV-1-infected coma. Cancer. 2003;98(11):2440–6.
5 Cutaneous Emergencies in the HIV-Positive Patient 101
115. Gormley RH, Kovarik CL. Dermatologic manifesta- 125. Couppie P, Abel S, Voinchet H, et al. Immune
tions of HPV in HIV-infected individuals. Curr HIV/ reconstitution inflammatory syndrome associated
AIDS Rep. 2009;6(3):130–8. with HIV and leprosy. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(8):
116. Schwartz JJ, Dias BM, Safai B. HIV-related malig- 997–1000.
nancies. Dermatol Clin. 1991;9(3):503–15. 126. Connick E, Kane MA, White IE, Ryder J, Campbell
117. Bower M, Palmieri C, Dhillon T. AIDS-related TB. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
malignancies: changing epidemiology and the associated with Kaposi sarcoma during potent anti-
impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Curr retroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis.
Opin Infect Dis. 2006;19(1):14–9. 2004;39(12):1852–5.
118. Gormley RH, Groft CM, Miller CJ, Kovarik CL. 127. Breton G, Duval X, Estellat C, et al. Determinants of
Digital squamous cell carcinoma and association immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in
with diverse high-risk human papillomavirus types. J HIV type 1-infected patients with tuberculosis after
Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(5):981–5. initiation of antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis.
119. Shelburne 3rd SA, Hamill RJ. The immune reconsti- 2004;39(11):1709–12.
tution inflammatory syndrome. AIDS Rev. 128. Richardson D, Rubinstein L, Ross E, et al. Cystic
2003;5(2):67–79. lung lesions as an immune reconstitution
120. Shelburne 3rd SA, Hamill RJ, Rodriguez-Barradas inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in HIV-TB co-infec-
MC, et al. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syn- tion? Thorax. 2005;60(10):884.
drome: emergence of a unique syndrome during 129. Pires A, Nelson M, Pozniak AL, et al. Mycobacterial
highly active antiretroviral therapy. Medicine immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in
(Baltimore). 2002;81(3):213–27. HIV-1 infection after antiretroviral therapy is associ-
121. Huiras E, Preda V, Maurer T, Whitfeld M. Cutaneous ated with deregulated specific T-cell responses:
manifestations of immune reconstitution beneficial effect of IL-2 and GM-CSF immunother-
inflammatory syndrome. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. apy. J Immune Based Ther Vaccines. 2005;3:7.
2008;3(4):453–60. 130. Reddy V, Luzzi GA. Chronic vulval ulceration–
122. Ratnam I, Chiu C, Kandala NB, Easterbrook PJ. another immune reconstitution inflammatory syn-
Incidence and risk factors for immune reconstitution drome? Int J STD AIDS. 2005;16(6):454–5.
inflammatory syndrome in an ethnically diverse HIV 131. Breton G, Adle-Biassette H, Therby A, et al. Immune
type 1-infected cohort. Clin Infect Dis. reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-
2006;42(3):418–27. infected patients with disseminated histoplasmosis.
123. da Cunha Colombo ER, Mora DJ, Silva-Vergara ML. AIDS. 2006;20(1):119–21.
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) 132. Imamura E, Yamashita H, Fukuhara T, et al. Case of
associated with Cryptococcus neoformans infection highly active anti-retroviral therapy-induced immune
in AIDS patients. Mycoses. 2011;54(4):e178–82. reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in AIDS-
124. Achenbach CJ, Harrington RD, Dhanireddy S, Crane related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.
HM, Casper C, Kitahata MM. Paradoxical Immune Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2007;47(10):650–6.
Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in HIV-Infected 133. Ueno T, Mitsuishi T, Kimura Y, et al. Immune recon-
Patients Treated With Combination Antiretroviral stitution inflammatory syndrome associated with
Therapy After AIDS-Defining Opportunistic Infection. Kaposi’s sarcoma: successful treatment with inter-
Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(3): 424–33. feron-alpha. Eur J Dermatol. 2007;17(6):539–40.
Graft-Versus-Host Disease
6
David Pompei, Kathryn J. Russell,
and Frederick A. Pereira
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a multisys- [1]. Animal research demonstrated that HSCT
tem disorder combining features of both autoim- was able to replace radiation-damaged host cells
munity and immunodeficiency. It is a common with healthy, transplanted donor cells. This pre-
and serious complication of hematopoietic stem clinical data provided impetus for future studies
cell transplantation (HSCT), and rarely solid investigating HSCT following chemoradiother-
organ transplantation, transfusion, and donor apy in leukemic patients. The use of transplanted
lymphocyte infusion. Because of its complex cells as a treatment option has driven research
pathophysiology and diverse clinical manifesta- into stem cell graft types (autologous, syngeneic,
tions, management of this challenging disease and allogeneic) and graft sources (bone marrow,
requires a multidisciplinary approach. Skin peripheral blood, and umbilical cord blood).
findings are the most common presenting sign, Improvements in treatment have led to increased
and they found in all forms of GVHD; therefore, use of HSCT for a wide variety of disease
the dermatologist plays an important role in diag- (Table 6.1). Unfortunately, despite these improve-
nosis and therapy. ments and research advances, GVHD remains a
Research into HSCT began in the years fol- serious complication of this procedure.
lowing World War II in an effort to address fears
over the deleterious effects of radiation exposure
6.1 Overview of HSCT
significant comorbidities [2]. Conditioning usu- cells (RBCs) are reinfused back into the donor.
ally takes 7–10 days. Stem cells can be frozen for prolonged periods
After completion of conditioning, stem cells without damaging their function or viability.
are infused intravenously, usually through a cen- Peripheral blood contains more T cells than bone
tral venous line. Stem cells can be derived from marrow, thus increasing the risk of graft-versus-
bone marrow, peripheral blood or umbilical cord host disease (GVHD) [4, 5]. With umbilical cord
blood. If the patient himself provides stem cells, blood, there is a lower incidence of GVHD, and a
the transplant is said to be autologous. An alloge- much lower risk of infection by latent viruses
neic (allos means other in Greek) transplant such as Epstein Barr (EB) or cytomegalovirus
means that stem cells are derived from another (CMV). One or two HLA disparities can be toler-
individual. If the other individual is an identical ated by the recipient, and cord blood is easily
twin, the transplant is “syngeneic.” banked, typed and stored. The main disadvantage
Extraction of bone marrow is usually done is that it contains low numbers of stem cells, and
under general anesthesia as significant amounts there may be failure of engraftment. Cord blood
of marrow (>70 ml) are obtained from the iliac is mainly used in children [6–8] (Table 6.2).
crests. Extraction of stem cells from peripheral Following infusion, stem cells migrate to the
blood is logistically easier, and it avoids the risks bone marrow. In the range of 2–4 weeks, they
of general anesthesia. Peripheral blood is the will “engraft” and start producing normal blood
most common source of allogeneic stem cells in cells. The day of engraftment is defined as the
adult recipients (>20 years old), and bone mar- first of three consecutive days in which the neu-
row the most common in recipients under 20. trophil count is greater than 0.5 × 10(9)/l. If
Overall, peripheral blood is the most common engraftment does not occur by day 30, the graft is
source of stem cells [3]. The donor is primed with considered failed [9]. Hematopoietic function
granulocyte-macrophage stimulating factor normalizes in a matter of weeks; however,
(GMSF), peripheral blood is removed, white immune function takes months, or even years to
blood cells (WBCs) are separated, and red blood normalize [10]. From the start of conditioning to
6 Graft-Versus-Host Disease 105
the time of engraftment, the patient is in a state of GVHD to occur [21]. One, the graft must contain
pancytopenia and profound immunosuppression. immunologically active cells, now known to be
The risk of lethal viral, bacterial or fungal infec- alloreactive T cells. Two, the recipient must
tion is high. Infection can come about from exter- express tissue antigens foreign to the donor.
nal sources, from endogenous flora of the skin Three, the recipient must be incapable of mount-
and gut, or through reactivation of latent viruses, ing an immunological response against the donor
particularly CMV [11]. Prophylactic antibiotics cells. The incidence and severity of aGVHD
and careful supportive care are critical during this relate to the extent of mismatch of HLA proteins
period. Mucositis can be severe during the pancy- [19]. Ideally, there will be high resolution match-
topenic phase, and total parenteral nutrition ing for HLA-A, B, C and DR B1 between donor
(TPN) may be necessary [12–14]. Following and recipient (“8/8 match”) [19]. However, even
engraftment, there is recovery from pancytopenia if the donor is an identical twin, GVHD can still
and healing of mucositis; however, at this early occur because of mismatch of minor histocom-
stage the immune system remains weakened and patibility antigens (mHA) [22, 23].
dysregulated. Every human being is genetically unique, and
HSCT is a debilitating, emotionally taxing, this uniqueness also applies to monozygotic twins
high-risk procedure associated with significant in whom subtle, but medically significant genetic
treatment-related morbidity and mortality [15, differences exist. For example, single nucleotide
16]. In the months to years it takes for the engrafted polymorphisms (SNPs) in the thiopurine methyl-
stem cells to differentiate, proliferate and give rise transferase gene have been identified in identical
to a functional immune system, patients suffer twins. These polymorphisms result in differences
infections, fatigue and psychological debility. in metabolizing capacity between the twins.
Children and young adults are most likely to expe- These genetic differences come about because of
rience complete immune reconstitution; however, somatic mutations that occur in utero, meiotic
complete immune recovery may never take place and mitotic recombination, and biased gene con-
in older adults, particularly in patients who versions. Genes and genomes are in a state of
develop chronic GVHD (cGVHD) [17, 18]. constant evolution [22, 24].
Following HSCT, donor-derived, immunologi- Minor HAs are immunogenic peptides derived
cally active cells are confronted with infection, from genes outside the MHC. They arise through
residual malignant cells, and a variety of foreign polymorphisms in homologous genes between
proteins. Acute GVHD (aGVHD) results from recipient and donor [25]. Polymorphisms in
this confrontation and is a major cause of morbi- recipient genes result in different amino acid
dity and mortality following HSCT [19]. sequences, which are recognized by donor T cells
aGVHD occurs when donor T cells react as non-self [19]. Approximately 30 mHAs have
against recipient HLA antigens and minor histo- thus far been identified in humans [22]. For
compatibility antigens (mHA). It occurs in example, males express several H-Y antigens
60–80% of patients in which there is an HLA encoded on the Y chromosome. These antigens
mismatch, and in 20–50% of patients who receive are recognized as foreign by lymphocytes from
stem cells from an HLA identical sibling donor female donors, and aGVHD will result from gen-
[20]. In 1966, Rupert Billingham identified three der mismatch [26]. Multiple other mHAs exist,
preconditions that need to be met in order for all of which can trigger aGVHD [27]. Minor HAs
106 D. Pompei et al.
may play an important role in graft-versus-leuke- 100 days. This temporal division has been
mia (GVL) effect because some of these antigens superseded by a new classification developed
are only expressed on hematopoietic cells [28]. by experts in an NIH Consensus Development
The success of HSCT in leukemia is due in part Project on Criteria for clinical trials in cGVHD
to GVL effect mediated by donor immune cells [29] (Table 6.3). In the new classification, the two
[25, 28]. The relapse rate of leukemia is lower in main categories remain, but each has two subcat-
patients who develop GVHD compared to those egories. aGVHD is subclassified into “classic”
who do not. It is also lower in patients receiving aGVHD occurring before day 100 following the
allogeneic versus syngeneic transplants because transplant, or persistent, recurrent or late aGVHD
the former are more likely to develop GVHD occurring after day 100. cGVHD is subclassified
than the latter. into classic cGVHD, and an overlap syndrome in
which features of aGVHD and cGVHD occur
together. In the new classification system, clinical
6.1.1 Acute GVHD and pathologic manifestations take priority over
time of onset.
GVHD has traditionally been divided into two Ferrara and associates have identified three
forms, acute and chronic. aGVHD classically distinct phases in the pathogenesis of aGVHD
referred to disease that occurred in the first 100 [19, 30, 31] (Fig. 6.1). Phase one involves induc-
days, and chronic, after day 100. This classification tion of host cytokines and activation of host
has proven inadequate because aGVHD can antigen presenting cells (APCs). Infections, con-
occur after day 100, particularly in patients who ditioning regimens and underlying disease all
have undergone reduced intensity conditioning, cause cellular damage and release of pro-
and features of cGVHD are common in the first inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-a, IL-1,
Table 6.3 NIH criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease
Classic acute Persistent, recurrent or late Classic chronic Overlap syndrome
acute GVHD
Days post transplant £100 >100 N/A N/A
Symptoms Maculopapular Maculopapular rash, At least one Features of both
rash, nausea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, diagnostic clinical acute and chronic
vomiting, anorexia, diarrhea, ileus, choestatic sign or manifesta- GVHD
diarrhea, ileus, hepatitis tion confirmed by
choestatic hepatitis biopsy or other
testing (see
Table 6.3)
and IL-6. Increased serum levels of these cytok- causes tissue damage by inducing apoptosis of
ines upregulate adhesion molecules, MHC mole- target cells after activation of the TNF-Fas activa-
cules and mHAs on APCs [30]. In addition, tion pathway [36]. NO, produced by macrophages,
damage to the GI tract from conditioning results inhibits proliferation of epithelial stem cells and
in translocation of immunostimulatory molecules thereby inhibits repair of target tissue [35]. Damage
such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other bac- to the GI tract occurring during phase three causes
terial products into the systemic circulation [32, more release of bacterial LPS, which further
33]. Macrophages and other cells of the innate upregulates innate immune function. A feedback
immune system recognize pathogen associated loop is created that enhances antigen presentation
molecular patterns, and they secrete cytokines, and activation of alloreactive donor T cells [30].
chemokines, adhesion molecules and costimula- Natural killer (NK) cells appear to modulate
tory molecules. The innate immune system is aGVHD. NK cells are the first lymphocytes to
“primed.” MHC molecules are upregulated, lead- recover to normal numbers after HSCT, and they
ing to enhanced antigen presentation by antigen- play a role in both innate and adaptive immunity.
presenting cells [34]. Decontamination of the Early animal models demonstrated that NK cells
gastrointestinal tract has been associated with were not crucial for the development of GVHD
reduced incidence of aGVHD both clinically and and their role in GVHD was incompletely under-
in animal models, and in some centers, gut decon- stood [37]. More recently, NK cells have been
tamination is standard procedure [34]. shown to decrease GVHD severity by inhibiting
Phase two consists of antigen presentation to immature dendritic cells and suppressing alloanti-
donor T cells. This occurs in recipient lymphoid gen-driven proliferation of donor CD4+ T cells
tissue. In direct presentation, donor T cells [38, 39]. In addition, they can work in concert
recognize peptides bound to allogeneic MHC with T regulatory (Treg) cells to prevent cGVHD
molecules on recipient APCs, or they recognize [39]. NK cell function may be more important in
and react to the allogeneic MHC molecule itself unrelated donor HSCTs compared to related
without peptide [35]. In indirect presentation, donors as polymorphisms in NK cell receptor and
donor APCs will degrade allogeneic MHC mole- ligand complexes have been linked to differences
cules into peptides, which are presented on the in GVHD and relapse rates. Patients undergoing
cell surface by donor-MHC molecules and recog- unrelated HSCT with a graft containing high
nized by donor T cells. In response to antigen pre- numbers of NK cells (CD56+) had a significantly
sentation, activated donor T cells proliferate and reduced incidence of severe aGVHD compared to
differentiate. They then exit lymphoid tissue and patients receiving grafts with lower numbers of
traffic to target organs. Activated T cells secrete NK cells [40]. This effect was not seen with
cytokines, in particular IL-2 and IFN-g, both of related donors and did not seem to influence the
which are important mediators of aGVHD. These graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect.
cytokines trigger cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) aGVHD can involve many organs; however,
responses to alloantigens, and they also induce skin, intestine, and liver are the main targets [20].
monocytes and macrophages to produce Skin is usually the first organ involved with rashes
proinflammatory cytokines IL-1 and TNF-a [35]. occurring in at least 80% of patients [20]. Hepatic
During phase three, the effector stage, actual and intestinal manifestations appear a few days
target organ damage takes place [30, 35]. CTLs are after the rash [41]. Extensive rashes are common
the predominant cellular effectors of aGVHD, and in the post-transplant period, and these can
they cause tissue damage via the Fas/FasL and the include drug reactions, chemotherapy related
perforin/granzyme pathway. TNF-a, IL-1, and toxicity, viral exanthems, toxin-mediated ery-
nitric oxide (NO) are the main inflammatory themas, engraftment syndrome, and intrinsic
cytokine effectors. TNF-a activates APCs, it inflammatory skin diseases not related to the
enhances alloantigen recognition, and it recruits HSCT. These pathologic processes may occur
effecter cells to target organs [19]. It also directly simultaneously.
108 D. Pompei et al.
Dermatologists play a key role in sorting out more likely drug reactions, reactions to condi-
post-transplant rashes. Diagnosis of aGVHD is tioning, or infections rather than aGVHD. Acute
based on clinical and histopathologic features. cutaneous GVHD is heralded by a pruritic, some-
The main histopathologic features of cutaneous times painful “maculopapular” rash that tends to
aGVHD include a lymphocytic interface derma- be acrally distributed (Figs. 6.4, 6.5, and 6.6).
titis, vacuolar degeneration of the basal cell layer, Involvement of the palms, soles, pinnae, and
and necrotic keratinocytes [42]. Histopathologic cheeks is common [45]. Involvement of the face,
grading is based on the extent of keratinocyte palms and soles together is strongly predictive of
necrosis, which ranges from subtle vacuolar aGVHD rather than drug reaction [46]. The rash
alteration to complete epidermal necrosis [42] of aGVHD commonly affects the upper, sun-
(Table 6.4). A skin biopsy can yield valuable exposed areas of the body such as the face, arms
diagnostic information with minimal risk to the and shoulders [43, 47]. Exanthematous drug
patient (Figs. 6.2 and 6.3). In contrast, invasive reactions usually begin centrally and often do not
endoscopic procedures and biopsies of intestine involve the palms and soles. A follicular localiza-
and liver carry significant procedural risks, par- tion is also typical of aGVHD and an important
ticularly with respect to bleeding and infection clue to diagnosis [20, 48–50]. Atypical and severe
post-transplant [23, 43, 44]. skin manifestations of aGVHD may occur [51].
aGVHD usually manifests 2–6 weeks after Acute grade IV cutaneous GVHD resembles SJS/
transplantation. As a rough rule of thumb, rashes TEN, and mucositis consisting of oral and lip
occurring in the first 20 days post-transplant are erosions occurs in approximately 60% of these
patients [51]. However, in milder forms of
Table 6.4 Grading of the histopathological findings of aGVHD, mucositis is not a prominent clinical
cutaneous aGVHD feature [47]. Other mucosal manifestations of
Grade Skin changes aGVHD include erythema and lichenoid lesions.
1 Vacuolar degeneration of The liver is a common target organ in aGVHD.
epidermal basal cells Abnormal liver functions and jaundice secondary
2 Vacuolar change with spongiosis
to cholestasis comprise the typical clinical picture.
and dyskeratosis
3 Epidermolysis and bulla
Biliary epithelial cells are the primary target of
formation alloreactive donor T cells recognizing foreign
4 Total loss of epidermis HLA antigens and minor HAs on the surface of
Fig. 6.4 A woman with acute GVHD showing erythema- Fig. 6.5 A woman with acute GVHD with extensive ery-
tous macules and papules on the palms (Photo courtesy of thematous follicular macules coalescing into dusky
Gil Cortes, M.D.) patches on the thighs (same patient as in Fig. 6.4) (Photo
courtesy of Gil Cortes, M.D.)
these cells [52]. Histologically, there is lympho- chronic hepatic GVHD, and only 30% of patients
cytic infiltration of small bile ducts, nuclear pleo- with acute hepatic GVHD will experience com-
morphism, and apoptosis of epithelial cells [53]. plete resolution of liver abnormalities after initial
Untreated, acute hepatic GVHD can lead to loss of immunosuppressive treatment [52]. The differen-
bile ducts and worsening jaundice. A rising or per- tial diagnosis of liver abnormalities in the post-
sistent elevation of the bilirubin portends a poor transplant patient is complex and includes
prognosis. In some patients aGVHD can present sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), acute
with a hepatitis-like picture with elevation of ami- viral hepatitis and other infections, biliary obstruc-
notransferase enzymes [52, 53]. Fifty percent of tion, drug induced liver injury, TPN hepatotoxic-
patients with acute hepatic GVHD will develop ity, and numerous other conditions [53, 54]. Acute
110 D. Pompei et al.
tolerance to both allo- and self-MHC antigens Despite the large number of passenger
[63]. Myeloablative conditioning causes deple- lymphocytes, the incidence of GVHD is low. An
tion of Treg cells [64]. In addition, cyclosporine important reason is that a high percentage of
(CSA) and other medications administered post- hepatic T cells express gd receptors, 7–54% ver-
transplant interfere with the functional capacity sus <6% in peripheral blood. These cells produce
of the thymus to delete T cells bearing autoreac- Th2 cytokines, which downregulate Th1 responses
tive TCRs. This effect has been demonstrated in and suppress aGVHD [70]. In addition, patients
rodents, which are considered accurate models of receiving OLTs are immunosuppressed, not
human aGVHD [64, 65]. In the setting of autolo- immunoablated. Donor T cells are rejected by a
gous HSCT, loss of central tolerance coupled partially functioning immune system.
with the absence of peripheral Treg cells creates Skin rash is the major clinical sign associated
a permissive environment in which autoreactive with OLT-associated aGVHD [71]. Lesions erupt
T cells damage host tissue [62]. 1–8 weeks after transplantation. Skin lesions usu-
Although aGVHD causes considerable mor- ally begin distally on the palms and soles and rap-
bidity and mortality, it is associated with significant idly generalize [70]. Rapid progression to the GI
anti-tumor effects. It has been observed repeat- tract and bone marrow follow [70]. Fever in asso-
edly that patients with aGVHD have lower dis- ciation with the rash is a poor prognostic sign.
ease relapse rates than those without. Because aGVHD associated with OLT differs from
autoGVHD tends to be mild and limited to skin, aGVHD following HSCT in several respects. The
investigations have been undertaken to harness transplanted liver itself is not a target organ
graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect by artificially because alloreactive lymphocytes recognize trans-
inducing autoGVHD by post-transplant adminis- planted liver tissue as self. On the other hand,
tration of CSA alone, or CSA plus IFNg or IL-2. bone marrow involvement manifesting as pancy-
Unfortunately, no clear-cut anti-cancer benefit has topenia is a common and serious development
thus far been shown in clinical trials [64, 66]. [70]. Neutropenia can be a presenting sign of
GVHD following OLT [70, 71]. Because of high
mortality, and immunologic rejection of donor T
6.2 Acute GVHD Following Solid cells, cGVHD following OLT is unusual [70].
Organ Transplantation, A risk factor for aGVHD in the setting of OLT
Transfusion, and Donor is HLA compatibility [68]. The more well-
Lymphocyte Infusion matched the graft, the greater the likelihood of
aGVHD. If alloreactive hepatic T lymphocytes
aGVHD after solid organ transplantation is an express shared HLA determinants with the recip-
uncommon, but serious complication with high ient, they are less likely to be destroyed by the
mortality. It can occur with transplantation of any recipient immune system [70]. Age greater than
solid organ, but it is most likely to occur after 65, and large disparity in age between a young
small intestine transplant (5–10% incidence) or donor and an older recipient are also risk factors
orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) (1–2% inci- for the development of aGVHD following OLT.
dence) [67]. (“Orthotopic” means the donor organ Given the rarity of aGVHD following solid
is transplanted into the same place as the patient’s organ transplantation, diagnosis can be challeng-
original organ.) OLTs are performed much more ing. The usual presenting sign is rash, sometimes
commonly than intestinal transplants, so aGVHD associated with fever. The differential diagnosis
associated with solid organ transplants generally includes viral exanthem or other infection, drug
refers to OLT [68]. Alloreactive lymphocytes are eruption, and aGVHD [72]. A skin biopsy show-
transplanted along with the organ, and liver and ing interface dermatitis, vacuolar degeneration of
intestine contain the largest numbers. In fact, the basal cells and necrotic epidermal cells is highly
number of lymphocytes transferred in an OLT is suggestive of GVHD [70]. Donor cell chimerism
roughly equivalent to that in a bone marrow trans- is also an important feature of GVHD associated
plant [69]. with solid organ transplantation. Chimerism
112 D. Pompei et al.
refers to the presence of a mixed population of exceeds 90% [74]. Prevention is the best and
donor and recipient lymphocytes in tissue or most effective management strategy. Prevention
peripheral blood. Although important, chimerism consists of identifying those at risk. Once
is not absolutely diagnostic. It is not present in all identified, these patients should only receive
patients with solid organ aGVHD, and it is a fre- blood and blood components that have been irra-
quent finding immediately after OLT [73]. diated with 2,000 cGy or higher [74, 75].
Clinical response to treatment correlates with Irradiation of blood and blood products blocks
decrease or disappearance chimerism [69]. alloreactive lymphocyte proliferation, but it does
Transfusion associated aGVHD (TA-GVHD) not interfere with the function of RBCs, WBCs
occurs when transfused donor lymphocytes or platelets. Although some leakage of potassium
engraft in an immunocompromised host, or has been observed in irradiated blood, there is no
when the donor is homozygous for an HLA clinical evidence that irradiated blood is harmful
class 1 haplotype of the recipient, which allows to patients [74, 78].
donor lymphocytes to escape immunologic rec- Should leukemia relapse after HSCT, infu-
ognition by the recipient [74]. This sometimes sion of lymphocytes from the original donor can
happens when blood relatives donate blood to be used as a salvage treatment. Donor lympho-
immunocompetent recipients [74–76]. Certain cyte infusion (DLI) relies on graft-versus-leuke-
clinical situations are also high risk. Granulocyte mia effect, and it has proven quite effective in
transfusions contain large numbers of lympho- certain forms of leukemia, particularly in
cytes, and patients receiving them are usually relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)
neutropenic and immunocompromised. Infants [79]. Complete molecular and cytogenetic remis-
receiving exchange transfusions for erythroblas- sions have been achieved using this modality in
tosis fetalis receive a large volume of blood and a substantial proportion of treated patients [80].
cells, and their immune systems are immature. aGVHD and cGVHD can complicate DLI; how-
Patients with Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin ever, GVHD following DLI tends to be mild to
lymphoma (NHL), congenital immunodeficiency moderate, it is more responsive to treatment with
diseases, persons undergoing HSCT, and per- immunosuppressive therapy, and the onset tends
sons treated with purine analogues such as to occur later than GVHD following HSCT [79].
cytarabine are at risk for TA-aGVHD [74, 75, The reason is that the tissue damage and
77]. Patients with solid malignancies, hemato- “cytokine storm” resulting from conditioning,
logic malignancy other than Hodgkin’s disease/ infection and underlying disease are generally
NHL, and patients with AIDS are not consid- not present in the setting of DLI. However, the
ered to be at high risk [74]. presence of either aGVHD or cGVHD following
TA-aGVHD begins abruptly with fever 3–30 DLI is associated with a 2.3-fold risk of death in
days after the transfusion. Fever is followed by a comparison to patients without GVHD [81].
generalized maculopapular rash, which can prog- cGVHD develops in 33–61% of patients follow-
ress to erythroderma and bulla formation. Profuse ing DLI [82].
diarrhea, vomiting, anorexia, right upper quad-
rant pain, jaundice, elevated liver enzymes, and
pancytopenia complete the clinical picture [75]. 6.3 Staging and Grading of Acute
The overall tempo of TA-aGVHD is more rapid GVHD
than in HSCT-associated aGVHD [75]. Diagnosis
is made by clinical signs and symptoms, the dem- Stratification of aGVHD severity is important in
onstration of chimerism in blood and tissue, and determining prognosis. It is also useful in deter-
skin biopsy findings of interface dermatitis, basal mining entry into clinical trials and assessment of
cell vacuolization, and epidermal cell necrosis. outcomes to particular regimens. In 1974,
Unfortunately, treatment for TA-GVHD is Glucksberg proposed a grading system for
generally ineffective, and the overall mortality aGVHD severity [83]. The Glucksberg system is
6 Graft-Versus-Host Disease 113
intuitive, easy to apply, and has been in common but stage 3 skin involvement had significantly
use ever since. Severity of skin, liver and intesti- higher risk of death than patients with grade II
nal tract involvement is measured and assigned Glucksberg with stage 0–2 skin involvement [85].
stages from one to four. To determine grade, the The IBMTR severity index assigns letter grades
stages of the three organ systems, and a subjective from A to D. The assigned grade is based on the
one to four assessment of overall performance maximum involvement in an individual organ
status are tabulated. The patient is then assigned a regardless of involvement of other organ systems
grade of severity from one to four. In the [85]. It relies only on objective measurement of
Glucksberg system there are 125 possible combi- organ involvement, thereby reducing inter-ob-
nations when three organs plus performance sta- server variability (Table 6.6). Thus, in the exam-
tus are staged one to four [84] (Table 6.5). ple above, a patient with stage three skin
The International Bone Marrow Transplant involvement would be assigned to level C even if
Registry (IBMTR) severity index was created liver and intestinal tract were stage one. In addi-
after it was noted that patients with the same tion, the IBMTR severity index eliminates sub-
Glucksberg grade but with different patterns of jective assessment of performance status.
organ involvement had different outcomes [85]. In a mixed retrospective and prospective study
For example, patients with grade II Glucksberg, of 114 patients, Martino et al. found the IBMTR
index superior to the Glucksberg grading system agents, anti-CD3, anti-IL2 receptor, denileukin
in predicting transplant related mortality and fail- difitox, sirolimus, antithymocyte globulin, pen-
ure [86]. However, in a prospective study of 607 tostatin, and visilizumab, an anti CD-3 monoclo-
patients evaluating the two systems, Cahn et al. nal antibody [23, 27, 30, 87]. Corticosteroid
observed strong agreement between the two sys- nonresponders have a poor prognosis.
tems and no clear-cut advantage of one over the
other [84].
6.5 Conclusion
6.4 Prophylaxis and Treatment HSCT ranks as one of the most radical interven-
of Acute GVHD tions in the whole of medicine. The patient is
given nothing less than an entirely new immune
Risk factors for the development of aGVHD system, and he is potentially cured of hitherto
include histoincompatibility of MHC antigens untreatable, fatal diseases. New indications for
(particularly class II antigens), older age of donor HSCT are constantly arising, and the procedure
and recipient, gender mismatch (particularly is being performed with greater frequency. As
female donor with male recipient), presence of with all drastic interventions, HSCT comes with
infection, underlying disease stage and intensity a high cost: aGVHD. At high severity grades,
of conditioning [9, 26]. To the extent possible, aGVHD is a direct threat to life. Even with the
these risk factors should be modified. In addition, best of care, mortality is high. Lower severity
use of cord blood and decontamination of the gut grades are associated with considerable morbid-
are associated with lower incidence of aGVHD ity, and there is a high chance of evolution into
[6, 32]. cGVHD. cGVHD in its own right is a serious,
GVHD prophylaxis usually consists of a com- devastating disease associated with a huge pano-
bination of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus ply of medical and psychological problems.
methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) On the other hand, aGVHD is associated with
[23]. The purpose of prophylaxis is to inhibit the GVT effect. A consistent observation is that
activity of alloreactive T cells. Without prophy- patients with GVHD have a lower rate of leuke-
laxis the incidence of aGVHD approaches 100% mia and cancer relapse than those who do not.
[27]. Tacrolimus appears to be somewhat supe- Thus far, all interventions that ameliorate or pre-
rior to cyclosporine, and is less toxic [27]. MMF vent GVHD lessen GVT effect. The “holy grail”
is associated with less mucositis than methotrex- of treatment is to separate the two by targeting
ate. Antithymocyte globulin and anti-CD52 GVHD while preserving GVT. This remains an
monoclonal antibody (alemtuzumab) have also area of intensive, ongoing research.
been used for prophylaxis. Ex vivo depletion of T
cells in the donor graft is associated with
decreased incidence of aGVHD; however, this 6.6 Chronic Graft-Versus-Host
technique is associated with increased incidence Disease
of malignant disease relapse [27].
First line treatment of aGVHD consists of cor- cGVHD can arise during or directly after an epi-
ticosteroids [23, 27, 30]. Patients are usually sode of aGVHD (progressive onset cGVHD),
started on methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day, and after a disease-free interval (quiescent cGVHD),
the dose is slowly tapered depending on clinical or it can present de novo [88]. The condition usu-
response. Roughly 25% of patients will experi- ally occurs within 3 years after transplant, with
ence a complete response, and 50% a partial an average onset of 5 months [89]. cGVHD is a
response. For corticosteroid nonresponders, a multisystem disorder of immune dysregulation
wide variety of therapies has been tried including combining features of autoimmunity and
PUVA, extracorporeal photophoresis, anti-TNF immunodeficiency. It can affect virtually any
6 Graft-Versus-Host Disease 115
organ, and serious infection and secondary malig- The reported incidence of cGVHD following
nancy are constant threats. cGVHD profoundly allogeneic HSCT varies, but the overall incidence
damages quality of life, and patients with the is in the range of 50–70% [90, 91]. Incidence
condition suffer a variety of disabilities and depends on multiple predisposing factors includ-
impairments. cGVHD is associated with graft- ing prior aGVHD, older recipient age, intensity of
versus-tumor (GVT) effect, a phenomenon in conditioning, hematopoietic stem cell source
which alloreactive T cells attack host cancer cells (peripheral blood > bone marrow > umbilical cord
in addition to normal tissue. Because of GVT blood), mismatched or unrelated donor, female
effect, the incidence of cancer relapse is lower in donors with male recipients, graft manipulation
patients who experience cGVHD. Ideally, treat- (T-cell depletion), GVHD prophylaxis regimen
ment regimens for malignant disease aim to pre- and use of post-transplantation donor lymphocyte
serve GVT effect while preventing GVHD. infusions [29, 89, 92]. In a multi-center cohort
As previously stated, a 2005 NIH consensus analyzing 5,343 HSCT recipients with cGVHD,
conference established new guidelines for the the probability of overall survival was 72% at 1
diagnosis and staging of GVHD [29]. The new year and 55% at 5 years with a non-relapse mortal-
guidelines emphasized that clinical manifesta- ity (death unrelated to the original cancer) of 21%
tions rather than time are the major criteria by and 31% at 1 and 5 years, respectively [89]. Using
which cGVHD is distinguished from late aGVHD multivariate analysis of overall survival and non-
(Table 6.3). The clinical manifestations of relapse mortality, the study further classified
cGVHD are classified into four categories: diag- patients into risk categories and found several vari-
nostic, distinctive, common and other (Table 6.7). ables associated with a poorer outcome (Table 6.8).
Diagnostic features are considered pathogno- A prospective study comparing outcomes of
monic for the disease, and when present they patients with “overlap” GVHD versus those with
establish the diagnosis without any further test- classic cGVHD showed that overlap patients had
ing. Diagnostic skin findings include poikilo- greater functional impairment, higher symptom
derma, lichen planus-like eruption, deep sclerotic burden and increased non-relapse mortality [93].
lesions, morphea-like lesions, and lichen sclero- cGVHD most commonly affects skin, mucosal
sus-like lesions. Distinctive lesions are those surfaces, eyes, musculoskeletal system, gastroin-
commonly seen in cGVHD, but not sufficiently testinal tract, lungs, liver, and bone marrow.
unique to be considered diagnostic. These Clinical findings often mimic autoimmune dis-
include depigmentation, sweat impairment, pru- eases, particularly scleroderma, systemic lupus
ritus, maculopapular rash, and erythema. erythematosus, and Sjögren’s syndrome.
Distinctive features require further testing such Sclerodermoid, lichenoid lesions and lichen-scle-
as skin biopsy, or demonstration of cGVHD in rosus-like lesions are the characteristic skin man-
another organ system. Common features are ifestations of advanced cGVHD; however, subtle
those that occur in both aGVHD and cGVHD and nonspecific skin changes such as xerosis,
and include maculopapular rash, pruritus, and maculopapular rash, and ichthyosis can charac-
erythema. Other features such as keratoses terize early disease.
pilaris, hyperpigmentation and ichthyosis are Sclerotic variants range from superficial mor-
nonspecific and cannot be used to establish the phea or lichen-sclerosus-like lesions to deep, dif-
diagnosis. The diagnosis of cGVHD requires at fuse indurated plaques resembling scleroderma.
least one diagnostic clinical sign, or one distinc- An association exists between exposure to total
tive clinical sign plus a positive diagnostic test, body irradiation and the development of sclerotic
and the exclusion of other possible diagnoses, cGVHD [94]. All forms of sclerotic GVHD can
particularly late-onset aGVHD, malignancy, progress to disfigurement and impairment.
drug reaction and infection. An “overlap” sub- Sclerosis of underlying subcutaneous tissues can
type encompasses features of both aGVHD and lead to edema, joint stiffness, decreased range of
cGVHD. motion, and contracture. Lichenoid cGVHD
116
Organ or site Diagnostic (sufficient to establish Distinctive (seen in chronic GVHD, Other featuresc Common (seen with both acute
the diagnosis of chronic GVHD) but insufficient alone to establish a and chronic GVHD)
diagnosis of chronic GVHD)
Vaginal scarring or stenosis Fissuresa
Ulcersa
GI tract Esophageal web Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency Anorexia
Strictures or stenosis in the upper to Nausea
mid third of the esophagusa Vomiting
Diarrhea
Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Weight loss
Failure to thrive (infants and
children)
Liver Total bilirubin, alkaline
phosphatase >2 × upper limit
of normala
ALT or AST >2× upper limit
of normala
Lung Bronchiolitis obliterans diagnosed Bronchiolitis obliterans diagnosed BOOP
with lung biopsy with PFTs and radiologyb
Muscles, fascia, Fasciitis Myositis or polymyositisb Edema
joints Joint stiffness or contractures Muscle cramps
secondary to sclerosis Arthralgia or arthritis
Hematopoietic and Thrombocytopenia
immune
Eosinophilia
Lymphopenia
Hypo- or hypergammaglobulinemia
Autoantibodies (AIHA and ITP)
Other Pericardial or pleural effusions
(continued)
117
Table 6.7 (continued)
118
Organ or site Diagnostic (sufficient to establish Distinctive (seen in chronic GVHD, Other featuresc Common (seen with both acute
the diagnosis of chronic GVHD) but insufficient alone to establish a and chronic GVHD)
diagnosis of chronic GVHD)
Other Ascites
Peripheral neuropathy
Nephrotic syndrome
Myasthenia gravis
Cardiac conduction abnormality or
cardiomyopathy
Reproduced with permission from Elsevier and the NIH consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic GVHD, 2005 [29]
GVHD graft-versus-host disease, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, BOOP bronchiolitis obliterans-organizing pneumonia, PFTs pulmonary func-
tion tests, AIHA autoimmune hemolytic anemia, ITP idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
a
In all cases, infection, drug effects, malignancy, or other causes must be excluded
b
Diagnosis of chronic GVHD requires biopsy or radiology confirmation (or Schirmer test for eyes)
c
Can be acknowledged as part of the chronic GVHD symptomatology if the diagnosis is confirmed
D. Pompei et al.
6 Graft-Versus-Host Disease 119
Table 6.8 Factors associated with a higher risk of hyperkeratosis with follicular plugging and
mortality in chronic GVHD edema coupled with homogenization of the upper
Variable Comment dermis. All three chronic cutaneous GVHD
Increasing recipient >30 years old variants closely resemble both clinically and
age histologically their respective dermatologic
Presence of prior acute Increased risk with higher
conditions.
GVHD grade
Early onset of chronic Onset prior to 5 months
Oral and genital disease occurs in up to 80%
GVHD patients [97]. Lichen planus-like lacy white
Elevated serum >2 mg/dl plaques, ulceration, and scarring occur on the oral
bilirubin and genital mucosa of both women and men;
Lower Karnofsky <80 (Functional Status Score however, genital lesions cause more functional
performance status 0–100) impairment and more severe symptoms in women.
Thrombocytopenia Platelet count of <100 × 109/L
Vulvovaginal lesions cause dyspareunia and inter-
Transplant from a HLA Versus transplant from
mismatched unrelated HLA-identical sibling donor
ference with sexual function. Genital lesions are
or related donor usually associated with concurrent oral involve-
Intermediate or Versus early disease ment [98]. cGVHD commonly affects salivary
advanced disease status glands with resultant xerostomia [99, 100].
GVHD prophylaxis Better outcome with Ocular manifestations of cGVHD include
regimen CSA + MTX ± other vs.
xerophthalmia, blepharitis, corneal ulcer, cica-
Tacrolimus ± MTX ± other
Gender mismatch Female donor to male
tricial conjunctivitis, scleritis, glaucoma, and
recipient versus male donor to infections. Xerophthalmia is the most common
male recipient problem. Diagnosis is based on an abnormal
Schirmer test and slit-lamp demonstration of
keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Chronic ocular
presents with violaceous papules and plaques on GVHD rarely affects visual acuity, and it is gen-
extensor surfaces. The clinical presentation is erally accompanied by other systemic findings
virtually identical to that of idiopathic lichen [29, 101].
planus. Other skin changes associated with Nail changes are present in up to 50% of
cGVHD include depigmentation, poikiloderma, patients, and longitudinal ridging is the most
hypohidrosis with heat intolerance, erythema, common finding [102]. Periungual erythema,
and pruritus [95]. Pigment abnormalities can brittle nails, Beau’s lines, pterygium, and com-
cause severe cosmetic disfigurement. Chronic plete nail loss are also features of cGVHD.
cutaneous GVHD can be associated with an iso- Dermatoscopy reveals abnormalities in nailbed
morphic or isotopic response. Sclerotic cGVHD capillaries of patients with sclerodermoid
often appears in areas of minor skin trauma (iso- cGVHD, but not in patients with lichenoid
morphic response, or Koebner phenomenon), and cGVHD. These abnormalities include enlarged
lichenoid cGVHD sometimes follows another capillaries, neovascularization, avascular areas
skin disease such as herpes zoster (isotopic and hemorrhage [103]. Both scarring and non-
response) [95, 96]. scarring alopecia occur in cGVHD, and poliosis
The main histopathologic features of lichenoid is common. Hair abnormalities associated with
cGVHD lesions consist of hyperkeratosis, focal cGVHD should be distinguished from chemo-
hypergranulosis, vacuolar degeneration of the therapy or radiation effects.
basal cell layer, and a band-like infiltrate of lym- Systemic cGVHD often involves the GI tract,
phoid cells. Sclerodermatous lesions show epi- liver, lungs and immune system. Nausea, vomit-
dermal atrophy and sclerosis of the dermis. The ing, diarrhea, anorexia, weight loss, and abdomi-
sclerosis can involve the dermis alone, or it can nal pain are typical manifestations of
also involve subcutaneous fat and muscle. Lichen- gastrointestinal cGHVD. Endoscopic biopsy and
sclerosis like lesions show epidermal atrophy, characteristic radiographic findings confirm the
120 D. Pompei et al.
diagnosis. Chronic hepatic GVHD is usually tor forkhead box P3 (FoxP3). In cGVHD, the
associated with cholestasis, elevated bilirubin numbers of CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ Treg cells are
and elevated alkaline phosphatase. Definitive diminished [109, 110]. Strategies to increase
diagnosis requires positive liver biopsy findings numbers of Treg cells such as extracorporeal
plus a distinctive cGVHD manifestation in photophoresis and low dose IL-2 are associated
another organ system. with clinical improvement [91, 111].
Pulmonary signs and symptoms include B cell homeostasis is disturbed in cGVHD,
cough, wheezing, and dyspnea on exertion. These and both host-derived and donor-derived B cells
result from bronchiolitis obliterans (BO), an appear to play a role in pathogenesis [109, 112,
airway disorder in which bronchioles become 113]. The importance of B cells in cGVHD is
obstructed by fibrous granulation tissue. BO is a evidenced by significant clinical improvement
diagnostic pulmonary manifestation of cGVHD, following use of rituximab, an anti-CD20 mono-
and diagnosis of BO is confirmed by biopsy and clonal antibody causing B cell depletion. Several
abnormal pulmonary function tests [29]. Lung case series of patients treated with rituximab for
dysfunction is serious, and its presence is invari- cGVHD have shown improvement with response
ably associated with the highest severity grades rates varying from 43 to 80%. Manifestations of
of cGVHD [104]. skin, mucosal and musculoskeletal cGVHD
Thrombocytopenia and other cytopenias are respond best [90, 114]. B cells perform multiple
harbingers of decreased survival [105]. immunologic functions other than antibody pro-
Eosinophilia is common in cGVHD. Once duction. B cells present antigen, produce cytok-
thought to be a favorable predictor, reports now ines and chemokines, and regulate immune
show no correlation between eosinophilia and reactivity [88, 90]. Autoreactive B cells in
outcome [106]. The effect of cGVHD on immu- cGVHD secrete proinflammatory cytokines
nity can be devastating, and infection is a com- including IL-6, TNF-a, and IFN-g that activate T
mon cause of death. Immunosuppressant and cells, macrophages and NK cells [90]. The net
immunomodulating medications worsen suscep- result is potentiation of the inflammatory cas-
tibility to infection. cade. Antigen presentation by autoreactive B
The pathophysiology of cGVHD is complex cells promotes autoimmune tissue damage inde-
and current knowledge remains incomplete. pendent of antibody production [90]. Patients
A primary reason is the lack of animal models with cGVHD have a higher frequency of autoan-
that recapitulate human disease as completely in tibodies, including antinuclear antibodies and
cGVHD as they do in aGVHD [107, 108]. Several antibodies to smooth muscle, cardiolipin, dsDNA,
mechanisms have been identified that alone or in and platelet-derived growth factor receptor
concert contribute to pathogenesis [88]. Damage (PDGFR) [115, 116]. It is not entirely clear
to thymic epithelium from conditioning and whether these autoantibodies are directly patho-
aGVHD interfere with thymic deletion of self- genic or merely bystanders. Transfer of autoanti-
reactive T cells, resulting in loss of self-tolerance. bodies from cGVHD mice does not produce
Failure of central tolerance can lead to autoim- disease in normal mice [90]. However, autoanti-
mune phenomena. bodies to PDGFR have a stimulatory effect on
Under physiologic conditions, not all self- fibroblasts and induce production of collagen.
reactive T cells are eliminated in the thymus, and Stimulatory antibodies to PDGFR were found in
some make their way to the periphery. A subset 22 patients with extensive cGVHD, but not in
of T cells, regulatory T cells (Treg), inhibit self- HSCT patients without GVHD or in normal con-
reactive T cells that have escaped thymic deletion trols. Levels were highest in those with general-
from proliferating in response to self-antigens. ized skin involvement and lung fibrosis.
Treg cells exert their effects through several Autoantibodies to PDGFR may contribute to
cytokines including TGF-b and IL-10. Treg cells fibrosis and the scleroderma-like phenotype in
express CD4+ CD25+ and the transcription fac- cGVHD [117].
6 Graft-Versus-Host Disease 121
B cell-activating factor of the TNF family known to develop after localized radiation ther-
(BAFF), also known as B-lymphocyte stimulator, apy [95]. This is thought to represent an isomor-
is a cytokine that provides survival signals to B phic (Koebner) phenomenon. Similarly, Martires
cells and prevents apoptosis [90, 113]. High lev- et al. showed an association between condition-
els are present in autoimmune diseases such as ing with total body irradiation and the develop-
SLE, and a monoclonal antibody against BAFF ment of sclerotic type cGVHD [94].
(belimumab) is used in treatment of active lupus Patients with cGVHD should practice strict
[90]. High levels of BAFF are also present in sun avoidance because of immunosuppression
cGVHD. cGVHD is associated with low numbers and a propensity to develop skin cancer. The inci-
of naïve B cells and high levels of activated, dence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and
autoantibody-producing CD27+ B cells [118]. melanoma is elevated in cGVHD, particularly in
The high levels of BAFF enhance survival of acti- males and in those who have received total body
vated alloreactive and autoreactive B cells, thus irradiation [124]. Patients taking voriconazole, a
causing perpetuation of disease. systemic antifungal medication, are at especially
cGVHD in humans and in murine models is high risk. Voriconazole is a potent photosensi-
associated with expansion of Th2 CD4 lympho- tizer and a strong exacerbating factor for devel-
cytes and polarization to a Th2 cytokine profile opment of squamous cell carcinoma and
[88, 108, 109]. aGVHD is thought to be a Th1 melanoma [125–127]. Squamous cell carcinoma
mediated disease with elevation of TNF-a and associated with voriconazole can be aggressive
IFN-g, whereas cGVHD is considered a Th2 and multifocal, with high metastatic potential
mediated disease [45, 119, 120]. Fibrosis and [128–130].
chronic inflammation are the hallmarks of Frequent skin and mucosal examinations
cGVHD, whereas necrosis in target organs is the should be performed to detect cancer, ulcers, or
predominant finding in aGVHD [108]. In murine new areas of sclerosis. Serial photography is
models, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-b) helpful in this regard. cGVHD patients with a
plays an important role in the development of history of skin cancer should be examined every
fibrosis. CD4+ T cells home to target tissue and 6 months [131]. The incidence of oral cancer is
secrete IL-13, a Th2 cytokine that stimulates also increased, and examination of mucosal sur-
macrophages. Activated macrophages produce faces should be part of routine cancer surveil-
TGF-b, which binds to receptors on fibroblasts lance [124]. Mucosal and cutaneous erosions
causing collagen synthesis and fibrosis [108]. In must be treated promptly to prevent adhesions
patients with cGVHD, serum levels of TGF-b are and infection [131]. The skin of cGVHD patients
significantly increased [121]. IL-13 itself can tends to be xerotic, and generous use of emol-
bind to fibroblast receptors and directly stimulate lients is recommended. Treatment of chronic
collagen synthesis. IL-4 (another Th2 cytokine) ocular GVHD consists of liberal and frequent use
similarly binds to fibroblast receptors and stimu- of preservative-free artificial tears [132].
lates collagen synthesis [122]. Thus, the fibrotic If sclerodermoid change or faciitis are detected,
changes seen in cGVHD may be accounted for physiotherapy is advised. Physiotherapy, which
by a Th2 cytokine profile and by the presence of includes stretching, heat, and edema management,
autoantibodies to PDGFR. is considered a very important component of gen-
aGVHD is a strong predictor of subsequent eral cGVHD management. It should be started
cGVHD [123]. Therefore, steps to decrease the early to prevent contracture, reduced range of
risk of aGVHD, such as ex vivo T cell depletion motion and disability. Fasciitis occurs in approxi-
in the graft and optimization of HLA match, are mately 1% of patients and is characterized by
undertaken. In addition, minimizing toxicity of rock-hard, subcutaneous induration. Fasciitis is
conditioning reduces tissue damage, which can progressive and can lead to serious functional
later become a target for cGVHD. For example, impairment [131]. Myositis presents with muscle
lesions of sclerotic, cutaneous cGVHD have been pain and weakness, usually in association with
122 D. Pompei et al.
skin findings. Evaluation includes electromyogra- band ultraviolet B (UVB) are all treatment
phy, determination of creatine kinase and aldolase options. Higher response rates to phototherapy
activity, and muscle biopsy [112, 133]. Cases of have been observed in lichenoid disease as com-
myocarditis with electrocardiographic abnormali- pared to sclerodermoid cGVHD [139]. Although
ties have been described [134]. PUVA is effective, UVA and UVB without a
Patients with cGVHD are immunosuppressed, photosensitizer have the significant advantage of
and infection is a major cause of morbidity and avoiding psoralen-related side effects [140, 141].
mortality. Prophylactic antibiotics are an impor- In addition, the risk of skin cancer in long-term
tant adjunctive treatment [132]. Patients are at treatment is lower in UVB than in PUVA [142].
increased risk of infection by Pneumocystis In a small case series, Brazzelli et al. used
jirovecii and by encapsulated organisms such as narrow-band UVB to treat ten children with
S. pneumonia, H. influenzae and N. meningitides. steroid-refractory cutaneous cGVHD. Eight
Those at high risk for fungal or viral infections had a complete response with resolution of
should also be treated prophylactically with anti- skin lesions, while the other two showed a
fungal and antiviral medications. Patients lose partial response [143]. Given its wide safety
protective immunity after HSCT, and vaccination margin, phototherapy is an excellent choice for
should be instituted six months post-transplant patients with solitary cutaneous involvement or
[135]. However, patients and close contacts persistent skin lesions unresponsive to systemic
should avoid live vaccines until full immunocom- immunosuppression.
petency is achieved.
More than one third of cGVHD patients do methotrexate [159, 160], azathioprine [161, 162],
not respond to corticosteroid therapy [148]. pentostatin, rituximab, and imatinib.
Steroid refractory and steroid dependent disease Mycophenolate may be associated with a risk of
are typically defined by progression of cGVHD thrombocytopenia, recurrent malignancy, infec-
on prednisone ³1 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks, stable tion, and gastrointestinal discomfort [163, 164].
disease on ³0.5 mg/kg/day for 4–8 weeks or Methotrexate is a reasonable option. It is effec-
inability to taper the dose to £0.5 mg/kg/day. If a tive, and side effects are predictable and manage-
patient cannot be weaned from corticosteroids able [159, 160]. Azathioprine is not often used
after 3 months, adjuvant therapies need to be con- because one study showed increased nonrelapse
sidered; however, there is no established second- mortality when azathioprine plus prednisone was
line treatment [91]. compared to prednisone alone [161]. Pentostatin
Inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamy- inhibits adenosine deaminase resulting in apopto-
cin (mTOR), sirolimus and everolimus, block sis of dividing lymphocytes, and two phase II tri-
response to interleukin-2 (IL-2) and prevent acti- als demonstrated response rates of about 50%
vation and proliferation of T and B lymphocytes. [149, 165]. Side effects of pentostatin, however,
In addition, they may promote the generation of are severe: serious infection, leukoencephalopa-
Treg cells [149]. Treatments of cGVHD with the thy, anemia, and gastrointestinal symptoms
combination of an mTOR inhibitor and predni- caused a 25% drop out rate in the trials. Rituximab
sone have shown response rates of 60–70% [150, has shown benefit in the treatment of cGVHD,
151]. This combination is well tolerated and and it may also be helpful in prevention [90, 108,
effective for patients with sclerodermatous 166]. A meta-analysis of 111 patients with
cGVHD [151]. However, the addition of an cGVHD showed a combined response rate that
mTOR inhibitor to a CNI appears to increase the approached 70% [167]. The most notable
risk of thrombotic microangiopathy [151, 152]. responses were seen with the cutaneous and
Extracorporeal photophoresis (ECP) is a pro- musculocutaneous manifestations [168]. Imatinib
cedure wherein peripheral blood mononuclear mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activ-
cells are collected from the patient, treated with ity against BCR-ABL-positive malignancies. It is
8-methoxypsoralen, irradiated with UVA, and also an inhibitor of PDGF and TGF-b signaling
then reinfused back into the patient [153]. The pathways. Several case reports and small series
net result is that ECP causes apoptosis of donor have shown usefulness in sclerodermatous
effector lymphocytes while increasing donor cGVHD [149, 165, 169–172].
Treg cells [154]. ECP is considered an immuno-
modulating treatment, not an immunosuppressive
treatment [155]. It is effective for some cases of 6.7 Emerging Therapies
steroid dependent or refectory cGVHD, and one
study showed lower non-relapse mortality in ECP Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a cytokine necessary for
responders [156]. Another study showed that the development, expansion and function of T
most patients were able to achieve 50% improve- cells, including Treg cells, which suppress
ment in cutaneous cGVHD lesions with bimonthly autoreactivity and maintain tolerance to self-
ECP sessions, and over 75% of the patients were antigens. Treg cells are reduced in cGVHD and
able to reduce doses of systemic immunosup- other autoimmune diseases [109, 110]. Koreth
pressive medication after six months [157]. et al. treated 29 patients with glucocorticoid
Sclerodermatous lesions responded better than refractory cGVHD with daily low-dose subcu-
lichenoid lesions. Given its excellent safety taneous IL-2 [91]. Of 23 patients available for
profile, ECP is a valuable adjunctive therapy. analysis, 12 had major responses in several
Numerous other medications have been used sites, including skin, and 3 patients had partial
in the treatment of steroid-refractory cGVHD. responses. All treated patients experienced a
These include mycophenolate mofetil [149, 158], marked increase in Treg cells compared to
124 D. Pompei et al.
baseline values. None of the patients experi- patients treated with MSCs. Four patients achieved
enced recurrent malignancy, and several who a complete response and ten a partial response
continued this treatment were able to lower [148]. Moreover, 9 of the 14 patients were able to
their glucocorticoid dose. The most common reduce or discontinue immunosuppressive therapy
adverse effect was a dose-dependent flu-like completely, and the 2-year survival approached
syndrome. Serious adverse effects included 80%. Likewise, Zhou et al. treated four patients
renal dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, throm- with sclerodermatous cGVHD by direct injection
botic microangiopathy, and infection. Daily of MSCs into bone marrow. Following the injec-
low-dose IL-2 may prove to be an effective tion, Th1 cells increased and Th2 cells decreased
treatment, but safety and adverse side effects in all four patients. The reversal of Th1/Th2 ratio
remain a concern [91]. was accompanied by significant improvement in
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) also show skin lesions and joint mobility. None of the
potential value for treatment of both aGVHD and patients showed evidence of cancer recurrence
cGVHD. MSCs are pluripotent bone marrow after 14 months [180]. Although MSCs appear
progenitor cells capable of developing into mul- promising, more clinical trials are needed to assess
tiple mesenchymal cell lineages including osteo- effectiveness and safety.
blasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes, cardiomyocytes,
neurons, and endothelial cells [173]. They can
repair various tissues by homing to damaged sites 6.8 Conclusion
and differentiating into cells of that tissue [174].
They are also immunomodulators, and they cGVHD is a major source of disability and
inhibit T cell responses to create an immunosup- impairment following HSCT, and it can have a
pressive local microenvironment [175, 176]. profoundly negative impact on quality of life.
MSCs inhibit B lymphocytes, NK cells, and den- Fibrosis is a hallmark feature and a significant
dritic cells, but they increase Treg cell numbers cause of impairment. The immunosuppression
[176]. MSCs are obtained from bone marrow, accompanying cGVHD renders the patient sus-
umbilical cord blood, adipose tissue, and muscle. ceptible to infection and cancer, the main causes
They exhibit immunomodulatory effects while of death in this condition. The pathogenesis of
maintaining low immunogenicity. Several studies cGVHD is being elucidated, and promising new
have shown that they are safe to infuse intrave- treatments are on the horizon.
nously, and HLA-compatibility between MSC
donor and recipient does not appear to be impor-
tant. MSCs are hypoimmunogenic, and they References
avoid allorecognition.
Investigations have been undertaken to deter- 1. Mathe G, Amiel JL, Schwarzenberg L, Cattan A,
Schneider M. Adoptive immunotherapy of acute leu-
mine whether MSCs can prevent GVHD. In an
kemia: experimental and clinical results. Cancer Res.
open-label, randomized clinical trial, Ning et al. 1965;25:1525–31.
co-administered an allograft and MSCs at the 2. Sorror ML, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE, Franke GN,
time of HSCT [177]. Although co-administration Laport GG, Chauncey TR, et al. Long-term outcomes
among older patients following nonmyeloablative
decreased the incidence of both aGVHD and
conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell trans-
cGVHD, it increased the risk of primary disease plantation for advanced hematologic malignancies.
relapse [177]. However, other investigators sug- JAMA. 2011;306:1874–83.
gest that co-administration of MSCs and allograft 3. Ahmed SO, Ghavamzadeh A, Zaidi SZ, Baldomero
H, Pasquini MC, Hussain F, et al. Trends of hematopoi-
during HSCT is safe and may actually speed the
etic stem cell transplantation in the Eastern
engraftment process [178, 179]. Mediterranean region, 1984–2007. Biol Blood
MSCs are also being explored for treatment of Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:1352–61.
established cGVHD. Weng et al. reported good 4. Zhang H, Chen J, Que W. Allogeneic peripheral blood
stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for hema-
response in 14 of 19 steroid-refractory cGVHD
6 Graft-Versus-Host Disease 125
tologic malignancies: meta-analysis of randomized 19. Choi SW, Levine JE, Ferrara JL. Pathogenesis and
controlled trials. Leuk Res. 2011;36(4):431–7. management of graft-versus-host disease. Immunol
5. Bensinger WI. Allogeneic transplantation: peripheral Allergy Clin North Am. 2010;30:75–101.
blood vs. bone marrow. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011;24(2): 20. Penas PF, Zaman S. Many faces of graft-versus-
191–6. host disease. Australas J Dermatol. 2010;51:1–10.
6. Rocha V, Gluckman E. Clinical use of umbilical cord quiz 1.
blood hematopoietic stem cells. Biol Blood Marrow 21. Billingham RE. The biology of graft-versus-host reac-
Transplant. 2006;12:34–41. tions. Harvey Lect. 1966;62:21–78.
7. Cohen Y, Nagler A. Umbilical cord blood transplanta- 22. Spencer CT, Gilchuk P, Dragovic SM, Joyce S. Minor
tion–how, when and for whom? Blood Rev. histocompatibility antigens: presentation principles,
2004;18:167–79. recognition logic and the potential for a healing hand.
8. Bertaina A, Bernardo ME, Caniglia M, Vinti L, Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2010;15:512–25.
Giorgiani G, Locatelli F. Cord blood transplantation 23. Jacobsohn DA, Vogelsang GB. Acute graft versus
in children with haematological malignancies. Best host disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:35.
Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2010;23:189–96. 24. Duret L, Galtier N. Biased gene conversion and the
9. Saliba RM, de Lima M, Giralt S, Andersson B, Khouri evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu
IF, Hosing C, et al. Hyperacute GVHD: risk factors, Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009;10:285–311.
outcomes, and clinical implications. Blood. 2007; 25. Bleakley M, Riddell SR. Exploiting T cells specific
109:2751–8. for human minor histocompatibility antigens for ther-
10. Peggs KS, Aviva K, Mackall CL. Clinical implica- apy of leukemia. Immunol Cell Biol. 2011;89:
tions of immune reconstitution following hematopoi- 396–407.
etic stem cell transplantation. In: Bishop MR, editor. 26. Gratwohl A, Hermans J, Niederwieser D, van Biezen
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. New York: A, van Houwelingen HC, Apperley J. Female donors
Springer; 2009. p. xv. 589 p. influence transplant-related mortality and relapse
11. Jang JE, Hyun SY, Kim YD, Yoon SH, Hwang DY, incidence in male recipients of sibling blood and mar-
Kim SJ, et al. Risk factors for progression from cyto- row transplants. Hematol J. 2001;2:363–70.
megalovirus viremia to cytomegalovirus disease after 27. Goker H, Haznedaroglu IC, Chao NJ. Acute graft-vs-
allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. host disease: pathobiology and management. Exp
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;18(6):881–6. Hematol. 2001;29:259–77.
12. Kashiwazaki H, Matsushita T, Sugita J, Shigematsu 28. Bleakley M, Riddell SR. Molecules and mechanisms
A, Kasashi K, Yamazaki Y, et al. A comparison of oral of the graft-versus-leukaemia effect. Nat Rev Cancer.
mucositis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell trans- 2004;4:371–80.
plantation between conventional and reduced-inten- 29. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G,
sity regimens. Support Care Cancer. 2011;20(5): Wingard JR, Lee SJ, et al. National Institutes of Health
933–9. consensus development project on criteria for clinical
13. McDiarmid S. Nutritional support of the patient trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis
receiving high-dose therapy with hematopoietic stem and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow
cell support. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2002;12:102–15. Transplant. 2005;11:945–56.
14. Arfons LM, Lazarus HM. Total parenteral nutrition and 30. Ferrara JL, Levine JE, Reddy P, Holler E. Graft-
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an expensive versus-host disease. Lancet. 2009;373:1550–61.
placebo? Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;36:281–8. 31. Ferrara JL, Levine JE. Graft-versus-host disease in the
15. McNeer JL, Kletzel M, Rademaker A, Alford K, 21st century: new perspectives on an old problem.
O’Day K, Schaefer C, et al. Early elevation of Semin Hematol. 2006;43:1–2.
C-reactive protein correlates with severe infection and 32. Cooke KR, Olkiewicz K, Erickson N, Ferrara JL. The
nonrelapse mortality in children undergoing alloge- role of endotoxin and the innate immune response in
neic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow the pathophysiology of acute graft versus host dis-
Transplant. 2010;16:350–7. ease. J Endotoxin Res. 2002;8:441–8.
16. Agarwal S, O’Donoghue S, Gowardman J, Kennedy 33. Liu D, Yan C, Xu L, Wang Y, Han W, Zhang X, et al.
G, Bandeshe H, Boots R. Intensive care unit experi- Diarrhea during the conditioning regimen is corre-
ence of hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. lated with the occurrence of severe acute graft-versus-
Intern Med J. 2011;42(7):748–54. host disease through systemic release of inflammatory
17. Wingard JR, Hsu J, Hiemenz JW. Hematopoietic stem cytokines. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant.
cell transplantation: an overview of infection risks and 2010;16:1567–75.
epidemiology. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010;24: 34. Penack O, Holler E, van den Brink MR. Graft-versus-host
257–72. disease: regulation by microbe-associated molecules and
18. Cavazzana-Calvo M, Andre-Schmutz I, Dal Cortivo innate immune receptors. Blood. 2010;115:1865–72.
L, Neven B, Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Fischer A. Immune 35. Reddy P, Ferrara JLM. Pathophysiology of graft-ver-
reconstitution after haematopoietic stem cell trans- sus-host disease. In: Soiffer RJ, editor. Hematopoietic
plantation: obstacles and anticipated progress. Curr stem cell transplantation. Totowa, NJ: Humana,
Opin Immunol. 2009;21:544–8. Springer distributor; 2008. p. xvi. 736 p.
126 D. Pompei et al.
36. Washington K, Jagasia M. Pathology of graft-versus- 54. Levitsky J, Sorrell MF. Hepatic complications of
host disease in the gastrointestinal tract. Hum Pathol. hematopoietic cell transplantation. Curr Gastroenterol
2009;40:909–17. Rep. 2007;9:60–5.
37. Varkila K, Hurme M. Natural killer (NK) cells and 55. Ross WA, Ghosh S, Dekovich AA, Liu S, Ayers GD,
graft-versus-host disease (GVHD): no correlation Cleary KR, et al. Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of
between the NK cell levels and GVHD in the murine acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: recto-
P––F1 model. Immunology. 1985;54:121–6. sigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastro-
38. Olson JA, Leveson-Gower DB, Gill S, Baker J, Beilhack intestinal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol.
A, Negrin RS. NK cells mediate reduction of GVHD 2008;103:982–9.
by inhibiting activated, alloreactive T cells while retain- 56. Nishio N, Yagasaki H, Takahashi Y, Hama A, Muramatsu
ing GVT effects. Blood. 2010;115:4293–301. H, Tanaka M, et al. Engraftment syndrome following
39. Noval Rivas M, Hazzan M, Weatherly K, Gaudray F, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in
Salmon I, Braun MY. NK cell regulation of CD4 T children. Pediatr Transplant. 2009;13:831–7.
cell-mediated graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol. 57. Carreras E, Fernandez-Aviles F, Silva L, Guerrero M,
2010;184:6790–8. Fernandez de Larrea C, Martinez C, et al. Engraftment
40. Tanaka M, Kobayashi S, Numata A, Tachibana T, syndrome after auto-SCT: analysis of diagnostic crite-
Takasaki H, Maruta A, et al. The impact of the dose of ria and risk factors in a large series from a single cen-
natural killer cells in the graft on severe acute graft- ter. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45:1417–22.
versus-host disease after unrelated bone marrow 58. Dai E, Couriel D, Kim SK. Bilateral marginal keratitis
transplantation. Leuk Res. 2011;36(6):699–703. associated with engraftment syndrome after hematopoi-
41. Thomas ED, Storb R, Clift RA, Fefer A, Johnson L, etic stem cell transplantation. Cornea. 2007;26:756–8.
Neiman PE, et al. Bone-marrow transplantation (sec- 59. Schmid I, Stachel D, Pagel P, Albert MH. Incidence,
ond of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975;292:895–902. predisposing factors, and outcome of engraftment syn-
42. Rapini RP. Practical dermatopathology. St. Louis, drome in pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplant recipi-
MO: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. ents. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:438–44.
43. Deeg HJ, Antin JH. The clinical spectrum of acute graft- 60. Koreth J, Biernacki M, Aldridge J, Kim HT, Alyea III
versus-host disease. Semin Hematol. 2006;43:24–31. EP, Armand P, et al. Syngeneic donor hematopoietic
44. Ross WA, Couriel D. Colonic graft-versus-host dis- stem cell transplantation is associated with high rates
ease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005;21:64–9. of engraftment syndrome. Biol Blood Marrow
45. Hausermann P, Walter RB, Halter J, Biedermann BC, Transplant. 2011;17:421–8.
Tichelli A, Itin P, et al. Cutaneous graft-versus-host 61. Hood AF, Vogelsang GB, Black LP, Farmer ER,
disease: a guide for the dermatologist. Dermatology. Santos GW. Acute graft-vs-host disease. Development
2008;216:287–304. following autologous and syngeneic bone marrow
46. Byun HJ, Yang JI, Kim BK, Cho KH. Clinical differ- transplantation. Arch Dermatol. 1987;123:745–50.
entiation of acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease 62. Hess AD. Autologous graft-versus-host disease. J
from drug hypersensitivity reactions. J Am Acad Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2000;9:297.
Dermatol. 2011;65:726–32. 63. Hess AD. Modulation of graft-versus-host disease:
47. Benesch M, Deeg HJ. Pathophysiology of graft-ver- role of regulatory T lymphocytes. Biol Blood Marrow
sus-host disease. In: Soiffer RJ, editor. Hematopoietic Transplant. 2006;12:13–21.
stem cell transplantation. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 64. Kline J, Subbiah S, Lazarus HM, van Besien K.
Springer distributor; 2008. p. xvi. 736 p. Autologous graft-versus-host disease: harnessing
48. Tani M, Adachi A. Acute follicular graft-versus-host anti-tumor immunity through impaired self-tolerance.
disease. Dermatology. 1992;185:281–3. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;41:505–13.
49. Friedman KJ, LeBoit PE, Farmer ER. Acute follicular 65. Jenkins MK, Schwartz RH, Pardoll DM. Effects of
graft-vs-host reaction. A distinct clinicopathologic cyclosporine A on T cell development and clonal
presentation. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:688–91. deletion. Science. 1988;241:1655–8.
50. Chaudhuri SP, Smoller BR. Acute cutaneous graft 66. Bolanos-Meade J, Garrett-Mayer E, Luznik L, Anders
versus host disease: a clinicopathologic and immuno- V, Webb J, Fuchs EJ, et al. Induction of autologous graft-
phenotypic study. Int J Dermatol. 1992;31:270–2. versus-host disease: results of a randomized prospective
51. Goiriz R, Penas P, Perez-Gala S, Delgado-Jimenez Y, clinical trial in patients with poor risk lymphoma. Biol
Aragues M, Garcia-Diez A, et al. Stage IV cutaneous Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:1185–91.
acute graft-versus-host disease. Clinical and histo- 67. Zhang Y, Ruiz P. Solid organ transplant-associated
logical study of 15 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol acute graft-versus-host disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med.
Venereol. 2009;23:1398–404. 2010;134:1220–4.
52. McDonald GB. Review article: management of 68. Kohler S, Pascher A, Junge G, Sauer IM, Nagy M,
hepatic disease following haematopoietic cell trans- Schonemann C, et al. Graft versus host disease after
plant. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:441–52. liver transplantation—a single center experience and
53. McDonald GB. Hepatobiliary complications of review of literature. Transpl Int. 2008;21:441–51.
hematopoietic cell transplantation, 40 years on. 69. Shin CR, Nathan J, Alonso M, Yazigi N, Kocoshis S,
Hepatology. 2010;51:1450–60. Tiao G, et al. Incidence of acute and chronic graft-
6 Graft-Versus-Host Disease 127
versus-host disease and donor T-cell chimerism after Francaise de Greffe de Moelle et Therapie Cellulaire
small bowel or combined organ transplantation. J (SFGM-TC), Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI),
Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:1732–8. and International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry
70. Taylor AL, Gibbs P, Bradley JA. Acute graft versus (IBMTR) prospective study. Blood.
host disease following liver transplantation: the enemy 2005;106:1495–500.
within. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:466–74. 85. Rowlings PA, Przepiorka D, Klein JP, Gale RP,
71. Assi MA, Pulido JS, Peters SG, McCannel CA, Passweg JR, Henslee-Downey PJ, et al. IBMTR
Razonable RR. Graft-vs.-host disease in lung and Severity Index for grading acute graft-versus-host dis-
other solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. ease: retrospective comparison with Glucksberg
2007;21:1–6. grade. Br J Haematol. 1997;97:855–64.
72. Walling HW, Voigt MD, Stone MS. Lichenoid graft 86. Martino R, Romero P, Subira M, Bellido M, Altes A,
vs. host disease following liver transplantation. J Sureda A, et al. Comparison of the classic Glucksberg
Cutan Pathol. 2004;31:179–84. criteria and the IBMTR Severity Index for grading
73. Schrager JJ, Vnencak-Jones CL, Graber SE, Neff AT, acute graft-versus-host disease following HLA-
Chari RS, Wright Jr KJ, et al. Use of short tandem identical sibling stem cell transplantation. International
repeats for DNA fingerprinting to rapidly diagnose Bone Marrow Transplant Registry. Bone Marrow
graft-versus-host disease in solid organ transplant Transplant. 1999;24:283–7.
patients. Transplantation. 2006;81:21–5. 87. Carpenter PA, Lowder J, Johnston L, Frangoul H,
74. Ruhl H, Bein G, Sachs UJ. Transfusion-associated Khoury H, Parker P, et al. A phase II multicenter
graft-versus-host disease. Transfus Med Rev. study of visilizumab, humanized anti-CD3 antibody,
2009;23:62–71. to treat steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host dis-
75. Linden JV, Pisciotto PT. Transfusion-associated graft- ease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant.
versus-host disease and blood irradiation. Transfus 2005;11:465–71.
Med Rev. 1992;6:116–23. 88. Min CK. The pathophysiology of chronic graft-ver-
76. Agbaht K, Altintas ND, Topeli A, Gokoz O, Ozcebe sus-host disease: the unveiling of an enigma. Korean J
O. Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease in Hematol. 2011;46:80–7.
immunocompetent patients: case series and review of 89. Arora M, Klein JP, Weisdorf DJ, Hassebroek A, Flowers
the literature. Transfusion. 2007;47:1405–11. ME, Cutler CS, et al. Chronic GVHD risk score: a
77. Parshuram C, Doyle J, Lau W, Shemie SD. Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant
Transfusion-associated graft versus host disease. Research analysis. Blood. 2011;117:6714–20.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2002;3:57–62. 90. Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A, Hallek MJ, Storb RF,
78. Bashir S, Naik F, Cardigan R, Thomas S. Effect of von Bergwelt-Baildon MS. The role of B cells in the
X-irradiation on the quality of red cell concentrates. pathogenesis of graft-versus-host disease. Blood.
Vox Sang. 2011;101:200–7. 2009;114:4919–27.
79. Frey NV, Porter DL. Graft-versus-host disease after 91. Koreth J, Matsuoka K, Kim HT, McDonough SM,
donor leukocyte infusions: presentation and manage- Bindra B, Alyea III EP, et al. Interleukin-2 and regula-
ment. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. tory T cells in graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J
2008;21:205–22. Med. 2011;365:2055–66.
80. Porter D, Hexner EO, Cooley S, Miller JS. Cellular 92. Carlens S, Ringden O, Remberger M, Lonnqvist B,
adoptive immunotherapy after autologous and alloge- Hagglund H, Klaesson S, et al. Risk factors for chronic
neic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In: graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow trans-
Bishop MR, editor. Hematopoietic stem cell trans- plantation: a retrospective single centre analysis. Bone
plantation. New York: Springer; 2008. Marrow Transplant. 1998;22:755–61.
81. Chalandon Y, Passweg JR, Schmid C, Olavarria E, 93. Pidala J, Vogelsang G, Martin P, Chai X, Storer B,
Dazzi F, Simula MP, et al. Outcome of patients Pavletic S, et al. Overlap subtype of chronic graft vs.
developing GVHD after DLI given to treat CML host disease is associated with adverse prognosis,
relapse: a study by the Chronic Leukemia Working functional impairment, and inferior patient reported
Party of the EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. outcomes: a chronic graft vs. host disease Consortium
2010;45:558–64. study. Haematologica. 2012;97:451–8.
82. Porter D, Levine JE. Graft-versus-host disease and 94. Martires KJ, Baird K, Steinberg SM, Grkovic L, Joe
graft-versus-leukemia after donor leukocyte infusion. GO, Williams KM, et al. Sclerotic-type chronic GVHD
Semin Hematol. 2006;43:53–61. of the skin: clinical risk factors, laboratory markers,
83. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman and burden of disease. Blood. 2011;118:4250–7.
PE, Clift RA, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft- 95. Martires KJ, Baird K, Citrin DE, Hakim FT, Pavletic
versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow SZ, Cowen EW. Localization of sclerotic-type chronic
from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation. graft-vs-host disease to sites of skin injury: potential
1974;18:295–304. insight into the mechanism of isomorphic and isotopic
84. Cahn JY, Klein JP, Lee SJ, Milpied N, Blaise D, Antin responses. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147:1081–6.
JH, et al. Prospective evaluation of 2 acute graft-ver- 96. Mehra T, Metzler G, Bauer J, Koberle M, Garbe C.
sus-host (GVHD) grading systems: a joint Societe Isotopic response of graft versus host disease following
128 D. Pompei et al.
Herpes Zoster infection: case report and review of the positive regulatory T-cell (Treg) content is associated
literature. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92(4):383–4. with a low risk of GVHD following HLA-matched
97. Aractingi S, Chosidow O. Cutaneous graft-versus- allogeneic SCT. Blood. 2006;108:1291–7.
host disease. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:602–12. 111. Heshmati F. Extra corporeal photo chemotherapy
98. Kfoury HK, Alghonaim M, AlSuwaida AK, Zaidi (ECP) in acute and chronic GVHD. Transfus Apher
SN, Arafah M. Nasopharyngeal T-cell monomorphic Sci. 2010;43:211–5.
posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders and 112. Perruche S, Marandin A, Kleinclauss F, Angonin R,
combined IgA nephropathy and membranous glom- Fresnay S, Baron MH, et al. Association of mixed
erulonephritis in a patient with renal transplantation: hematopoietic chimerism with elevated circulating
a case report with literature review. Transplant Proc. autoantibodies and chronic graft-versus-host disease
2010;42:4653–7. occurrence. Transplantation. 2006;81:573–82.
99. Resende RG, de Fatima Correia-Silva J, Arao TC, 113. Socie G. Chronic GVHD: B cells come of age.
Brito JA, Bittencourt H, Gomez RS, et al. Oral Blood. 2011;117:2086–7.
cGVHD screening tests in the diagnosis of systemic 114. Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Cutler CS. Rituximab for pre-
chronic graft-versus-host disease. Clin Oral Investig. vention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease.
2012;16(2):565–70. Int J Hematol. 2011;93:578–85.
100. Nagler R, Marmary Y, Krausz Y, Chisin R, Markitziu 115. Rozmus J, Schultz KR. Biomarkers in chronic graft-
A, Nagler A. Major salivary gland dysfunction in versus-host disease. Expert Rev Hematol.
human acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease 2011;4:329–42.
(GVHD). Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996;17:219–24. 116. Fujii H, Cuvelier G, She K, Aslanian S, Shimizu H,
101. Koch KR, Joussen AM, Huber KK. Ocular involve- Kariminia A, et al. Biomarkers in newly diagnosed
ment in chronic graft-versus-host disease: therapeu- pediatric-extensive chronic graft-versus-host dis-
tic approaches to complicated courses. Cornea. ease: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group.
2011;30:107–13. Blood. 2008;111:3276–85.
102. Sanli H, Arat M, Oskay T, Gurman G. Evaluation of 117. Svegliati S, Olivieri A, Campelli N, Luchetti M,
nail involvement in patients with chronic cutaneous Poloni A, Trappolini S, et al. Stimulatory autoanti-
graft versus host disease: a single-center study from bodies to PDGF receptor in patients with extensive
Turkey. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43:176–80. chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood.
103. Akay BN, Sanli H, Topcuoglu P, Arat M, Akyol A. 2007;110:237–41.
Nailfold capillary abnormalities are prevalent in 118. Kim SJ, Won JH. B cell homeostasis and the devel-
sclerodermoid graft-versus-host disease and readily opment of chronic graft-versus-host disease: impli-
detected with dermatoscopy. Br J Dermatol. cations for B cell-depleting therapy. Leuk Lymphoma.
2010;162:1076–82. 2012;53:19–25.
104. Arai S, Jagasia M, Storer B, Chai X, Pidala J, Cutler 119. Skert C, Damiani D, Michelutti A, Patriarca F,
C, et al. Global and organ-specific chronic graft- Arpinati M, Fili C, et al. Kinetics of Th1/Th2 cytok-
versus-host disease severity according to the 2005 ines and lymphocyte subsets to predict chronic
NIH Consensus Criteria. Blood. 2011;118:4242–9. GVHD after allo-SCT: results of a prospective study.
105. Kuzmina Z, Eder S, Bohm A, Pernicka E, Vormittag Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44:729–37.
L, Kalhs P, et al. Significantly worse survival of 120. Kansu E. The pathophysiology of chronic graft-ver-
patients with NIH-defined chronic graft-versus-host sus-host disease. Int J Hematol. 2004;79:209–15.
disease and thrombocytopenia or progressive onset 121. Liem LM, Fibbe WE, van Houwelingen HC, Goulmy
type: results of a prospective study. Leukemia. E. Serum transforming growth factor-beta1 levels in
2011;26(4):746–56. bone marrow transplant recipients correlate with
106. Ahmad I, Labbe AC, Chagnon M, Busque L, Cohen blood cell counts and chronic graft-versus-host dis-
S, Kiss T, et al. Incidence and prognostic value of ease. Transplantation. 1999;67:59–65.
eosinophilia in chronic graft-versus-host disease after 122. Murata T, Husain SR, Mohri H, Puri RK. Two differ-
nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation. ent IL-13 receptor chains are expressed in normal
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:1673–8. human skin fibroblasts, and IL-4 and IL-13 mediate
107. Schroeder MA, DiPersio JF. Mouse models of graft- signal transduction through a common pathway. Int
versus-host disease: advances and limitations. Dis Immunol. 1998;10:1103–10.
Model Mech. 2011;4:318–33. 123. Atkinson K, Horowitz MM, Gale RP, van Bekkum
108. Chu YW, Gress RE. Murine models of chronic graft- DW, Gluckman E, Good RA, et al. Risk factors for
versus-host disease: insights and unresolved issues. chronic graft-versus-host disease after HLA-identical
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:365–78. sibling bone marrow transplantation. Blood.
109. Zhang C, Todorov I, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Kandeel F, Forman 1990;75:2459–64.
S, et al. Donor CD4+ T and B cells in transplants induce 124. Curtis RE, Rowlings PA, Deeg HJ, Shriner DA, Socie
chronic graft-versus-host disease with autoimmune G, Travis LB, et al. Solid cancers after bone marrow
manifestations. Blood. 2006;107:2993–3001. transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:897–904.
110. Rezvani K, Mielke S, Ahmadzadeh M, Kilical Y, 125. Epaulard O, Leccia MT, Blanche S, Chosidow O,
Savani BN, Zeilah J, et al. High donor FOXP3- Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Ravaud P, et al. Phototoxicity
6 Graft-Versus-Host Disease 129
and photocarcinogenesis associated with voricon- 139. Penas PF, Fernandez-Herrera J, Garcia-Diez A.
azole. Med Mal Infect. 2011;41:639–45. Dermatologic treatment of cutaneous graft versus
126. Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Long-term voriconazole host disease. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004;5:403–16.
and skin cancer: is there cause for concern? Curr 140. Leiter U, Kaskel P, Krahn G, Gottlober P, Bunjes D,
Infect Dis Rep. 2011;13:536–43. Peter RU, et al. Psoralen plus ultraviolet-A-bath pho-
127. Vadnerkar A, Nguyen MH, Mitsani D, Crespo M, tochemotherapy as an adjunct treatment modality in
Pilewski J, Toyoda Y, et al. Voriconazole exposure cutaneous chronic graft versus host disease.
and geographic location are independent risk factors Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2002;18:
for squamous cell carcinoma of the skin among lung 183–90.
transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 141. Vogelsang GB, Wolff D, Altomonte V, Farmer E,
2010;29:1240–4. Morison WL, Corio R, et al. Treatment of chronic
128. Ibrahim SF, Singer JP, Arron ST. Catastrophic graft-versus-host disease with ultraviolet irradiation
squamous cell carcinoma in lung transplant patients and psoralen (PUVA). Bone Marrow Transplant.
treated with voriconazole. Dermatol Surg. 1996;17:1061–7.
2010;36:1752–5. 142. Hearn RM, Kerr AC, Rahim KF, Ferguson J, Dawe
129. Vanacker A, Fabre G, Van Dorpe J, Peetermans WE, RS. Incidence of skin cancers in 3867 patients treated
Maes B. Aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carci- with narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy. Br J
noma associated with prolonged voriconazole ther- Dermatol. 2008;159:931–5.
apy in a renal transplant patient. Am J Transplant. 143. Brazzelli V, Grasso V, Muzio F, Moggio E, Zecca M,
2008;8:877–80. Locatelli F, et al. Narrowband ultraviolet B photo-
130. McCarthy KL, Playford EG, Looke DF, Whitby M. therapy in the treatment of cutaneous graft-versus-
Severe photosensitivity causing multifocal squamous host disease in oncohaematological paediatric
cell carcinomas secondary to prolonged voricon- patients. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162:404–9.
azole therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:e55–6. 144. Lee SJ, Flowers ME. Recognizing and managing
131. Marks C, Stadler M, Hausermann P, Wolff D, chronic graft-versus-host disease. Hematology Am
Buchholz S, Stary G, et al. German-Austrian-Swiss Soc Hematol Educ Program 2008:134–41.
Consensus Conference on clinical practice in chronic 145. Wolff D, Gerbitz A, Ayuk F, Kiani A, Hildebrandt GC,
graft-versus-host disease (GVHD): guidance for Vogelsang GB, et al. Consensus conference on clinical
supportive therapy of chronic cutaneous and muscu- practice in chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD):
loskeletal GVHD. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165:18–29. first-line and topical treatment of chronic GVHD. Biol
132. Couriel DR. Ancillary and supportive care in chronic Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:1611–28.
graft-versus-host disease. Best Pract Res Clin 146. Koc S, Leisenring W, Flowers ME, Anasetti C, Deeg
Haematol. 2008;21:291–307. HJ, Nash RA, et al. Therapy for chronic graft-ver-
133. Couriel DR, Beguelin GZ, Giralt S, De Lima M, sus-host disease: a randomized trial comparing
Hosing C, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, et al. Chronic graft- cyclosporine plus prednisone versus prednisone
versus-host disease manifesting as polymyositis: an alone. Blood. 2002;100:48–51.
uncommon presentation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 147. Sullivan KM, Witherspoon RP, Storb R, Deeg HJ,
2002;30:543–6. Dahlberg S, Sanders JE, et al. Alternating-day
134. Ahn JS, Cho SH, Kim YK, Yang DH, Bae WK, cyclosporine and prednisone for treatment of high-
Shim HJ, et al. Polymyositis and myocarditis after risk chronic graft-v-host disease. Blood. 1988;72:
donor lymphocyte infusion. Int J Hematol. 555–61.
2009;90:113–6. 148. Weng JY, Du X, Geng SX, Peng YW, Wang Z, Lu
135. Hilgendorf I, Freund M, Jilg W, Einsele H, Gea- ZS, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell as salvage treat-
Banacloche J, Greinix H, et al. Vaccination of allo- ment for refractory chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow
geneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Transplant. 2010;45:1732–40.
report from the international consensus conference 149. Wolff D, Schleuning M, von Harsdorf S, Bacher U,
on clinical practice in chronic GVHD. Vaccine. Gerbitz A, Stadler M, et al. Consensus conference
2011;29:2825–33. on clinical practice in chronic GVHD: second-line
136. Ziemer M, Gruhn B, Thiele JJ, Elsner P. Treatment treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol
of extensive chronic cutaneous graft-versus-host dis- Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:1–17.
ease in an infant with topical pimecrolimus. J Am 150. Couriel DR, Saliba R, Escalon MP, Hsu Y, Ghosh S,
Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:946–8. Ippoliti C, et al. Sirolimus in combination with tac-
137. Schmook T, Kraft J, Benninghoff B, Nindl I, Roewert rolimus and corticosteroids for the treatment of
J, Ulrich C, et al. Treatment of cutaneous chronic resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease. Br J
graft-versus-host disease with topical pimecrolimus. Haematol. 2005;130:409–17.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;36:87–8. 151. Jedlickova Z, Burlakova I, Bug G, Baurmann H,
138. Mawardi H, Stevenson K, Gokani B, Soiffer R, Schwerdtfeger R, Schleuning M. Therapy of sclero-
Treister N. Combined topical dexamethasone/tac- dermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease with
rolimus therapy for management of oral chronic mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Biol
GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45:1062–7. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:657–63.
130 D. Pompei et al.
152. Ponticelli C. De novo thrombotic microangiopathy. phenolate mofetil for initial treatment of chronic
An underrated complication of renal transplantation. graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2009;113:5074–82.
Clin Nephrol. 2007;67:335–40. 164. Furlong T, Martin P, Flowers ME, Carnevale-
153. Goussetis E, Varela I, Tsirigotis P. Update on the Schianca F, Yatscoff R, Chauncey T, et al. Therapy
mechanism of action and on clinical efficacy of with mycophenolate mofetil for refractory acute and
extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant.
acute and chronic graft versus host disease in chil- 2009;44:739–48.
dren. Transfus Apher Sci. 2012;46(2):203–9. 165. Inamoto Y, Flowers ME. Treatment of chronic graft-
154. Gatza E, Rogers CE, Clouthier SG, Lowler KP, versus-host disease in 2011. Curr Opin Hematol.
Tawara I, Liu C, et al. Extracorporeal photopheresis 2011;18:414–20.
reverses experimental graft-versus-host disease 166. Ratanatharathorn V, Ayash L, Reynolds C, Silver S,
through regulatory T cells. Blood. 2008;112: Reddy P, Becker M, et al. Treatment of chronic graft-
1515–21. versus-host disease with anti-CD20 chimeric mono-
155. Tsirigotis P, Kapsimalli V, Baltadakis I, Kaloyannidis clonal antibody. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant.
P, Karakasis D, Papalexandri A, et al. Extracorporeal 2003;9:505–11.
photopheresis in refractory chronic graft-versus-host 167. Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Mhaskar AR, Djulbegovic B,
disease: the influence on peripheral blood T cell sub- Cutler C, Mohty M, Kumar A. Efficacy of rituximab in
populations. A study by the Hellenic Association of the setting of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-
Hematology. Transfus Apher Sci. 2012;46(2): host disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
181–8. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:1005–13.
156. Tsirigotis P, Kaloyannidis P, Papalexandri A, 168. Cutler C, Miklos D, Kim HT, Treister N, Woo SB,
Baltadakis I, Karakasis D, Batsis I, et al. Bienfang D, et al. Rituximab for steroid-refractory
Extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood.
chronic graft-versus-host disease. The Hellenic expe- 2006;108:756–62.
rience: a study by the Hellenic association of hema- 169. Olivieri J, Coluzzi S, Attolico I, Olivieri A. Tirosin
tology. Transfus Apher Sci. 2012;46(2):173–80. kinase inhibitors in chronic graft versus host disease:
157. Dignan FL, Greenblatt D, Cox M, Cavenagh J, from bench to bedside. ScientificWorldJournal.
Oakervee H, Apperley JF, et al. Efficacy of bimonthly 2011;11:1908–31.
extracorporeal photopheresis in refractory chronic 170. Sanchez-Ortega I, Servitje O, Arnan M, Orti G,
mucocutaneous GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant. Peralta T, Manresa F, et al. Dasatinib as salvage ther-
2012;47(6):824–30. apy for steroid refractory and imatinib resistant or
158. Takami A, Mochizuki K, Okumura H, Ito S, Suga Y, intolerant sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease.
Yamazaki H, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil is effec- Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:318–23.
tive and well tolerated in the treatment of refractory 171. Chen GL, Arai S, Flowers ME, Otani JM, Qiu J,
acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Int J Cheng EC, et al. A phase 1 study of imatinib for
Hematol. 2006;83:80–5. corticosteroid-dependent/refractory chronic graft-
159. Wang Y, Xu LP, Liu DH, Chen H, Chen YH, Han W, versus-host disease: response does not correlate with
et al. First-line therapy for chronic graft-versus-host anti-PDGFRA antibodies. Blood. 2011;118:4070–8.
disease that includes low-dose methotrexate is asso- 172. Lazar J, Poonawalla T, Teng JM. A case of sclero-
ciated with a high response rate. Biol Blood Marrow dermatous graft-versus-host disease responsive to
Transplant. 2009;15:505–11. imatinib therapy. Pediatr Dermatol. 2011;28:172–5.
160. Inagaki J, Nagatoshi Y, Hatano M, Isomura N, 173. Wang S, Qu X, Zhao RC. Mesenchymal stem cells
Sakiyama M, Okamura J. Low-dose MTX for the hold promise for regenerative medicine. Front Med.
treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host dis- 2011;5:372–8.
ease in children. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;41: 174. Le Blanc K, Rasmusson I, Sundberg B, Gotherstrom
571–7. C, Hassan M, Uzunel M, et al. Treatment of severe
161. Sullivan KM, Witherspoon RP, Storb R, Weiden P, acute graft-versus-host disease with third party hap-
Flournoy N, Dahlberg S, et al. Prednisone and azathio- loidentical mesenchymal stem cells. Lancet.
prine compared with prednisone and placebo for treat- 2004;363:1439–41.
ment of chronic graft-v-host disease: prognostic 175. Ryan JM, Barry FP, Murphy JM, Mahon BP.
influence of prolonged thrombocytopenia after alloge- Mesenchymal stem cells avoid allogeneic rejection.
neic marrow transplantation. Blood. 1988;72:546–54. J Inflamm (Lond). 2005;2:8.
162. Curtis RE, Metayer C, Rizzo JD, Socie G, Sobocinski 176. Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal
KA, Flowers ME, et al. Impact of chronic GVHD stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell
therapy on the development of squamous-cell can- responses. Blood. 2005;105:1815–22.
cers after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: 177. Ning H, Yang F, Jiang M, Hu L, Feng K, Zhang J,
an international case-control study. Blood. et al. The correlation between cotransplantation of
2005;105:3802–11. mesenchymal stem cells and higher recurrence rate
163. Martin PJ, Storer BE, Rowley SD, Flowers ME, in hematologic malignancy patients: outcome of a
Lee SJ, Carpenter PA, et al. Evaluation of myco- pilot clinical study. Leukemia. 2008;22:593–9.
6 Graft-Versus-Host Disease 131
178. Lazarus HM, Koc ON, Devine SM, Curtin P, Maziarz sus-tumor effects after HLA-mismatched allogeneic
RT, Holland HK, et al. Cotransplantation of HLA- transplantation following nonmyeloablative condi-
identical sibling culture-expanded mesenchymal tioning. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:
stem cells and hematopoietic stem cells in hemato- 838–47.
logic malignancy patients. Biol Blood Marrow 180. Zhou H, Guo M, Bian C, Sun Z, Yang Z, Zeng Y,
Transplant. 2005;11:389–98. et al. Efficacy of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal
179. Baron F, Lechanteur C, Willems E, Bruck F, Baudoux stem cells in the treatment of sclerodermatous
E, Seidel L, et al. Cotransplantation of mesenchymal chronic graft-versus-host disease: clinical report.
stem cells might prevent death from graft-versus- Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:403–12.
host disease (GVHD) without abrogating graft-ver-
Erythroderma
7
Gillian Heinecke and Mark Lebwohl
(2.7%), and seborrheric dermatitis (2.5%). Erythrodermic psoriasis is a rare and severe form
Additionally, pemphigus foliaceus, lichen planus, of psoriasis occurring in 1–2.25% of patients with
icthyosiform dermatitis (Fig. 7.1), phytophotoder- psoriasis [26, 27]. It typically occurs in patients
matitis, stasis dermatitis, extensive dermatophytosis, with established psoriasis with an average of 14
Norwegian scabies, senile xerosis, and staphylo- years between the onset of psoriasis and the first
coccal scalded skin syndrome account for the erythrodermic episode [26], although in some
7 Erythroderma 135
cases, it can be the patient’s initial presentation of may also be seen in psoriasis, cutaneous T-cell
psoriasis. Erythrodermic psoriasis may present lymphoma and sarcoidosis [6]. Patients with PRP
acutely or may run a chronic course with frequent may also have underlying follicular papules and
relapses [26]. There are a variety of medical and keratoderma of palms and soles.
social conditions that may trigger outbreaks of
erythroderma in previously localized psoriasis
including systemic illness such as HIV infection, 7.3.4 Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions
discontinuation of medications (including oral
corticosteroids, potent topical steroids, methotrex- Both topical and systemic drugs are notorious for
ate or biologics), emotional stress, UV burn, topi- precipitating erythroderma, accounting for 20% of
cal tar, and alcoholism [26, 28]. The classic plaques cases. While this list is constantly expanding, many
of psoriasis may be present in the early and remit- of the implicated drugs come from single case
ting stages of erythroderma. The patient may also reports. The most commonly implicated drugs
have the classical nail changes and arthritis associ- include allopurinol, arsenicals, aspirin, carbam-
ated with psoriasis [29]. azepine, captopril, gold, hydantoins, mercurials,
penicillin, phenothiazines, phenylbutazone, quina-
crine, and sulfonamides. Additionally homeo-
7.3.3 Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris pathic, unani, ayurvedic, herbal, and home remedies
have also been reported to cause erythroderma
Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) may initially resem- [14]. Interestingly, while carbamazepine is known
ble a seborrheic dermatitis-like eruption of the to induce erythroderma, Smith et al. reported a case
scalp that then progresses into erythroderma over where the carbamazepine successfully cleared
weeks to years. A similar picture of eruption on erythrodermic psoriasis [30, 31] (Table 7.3).
the scalp, with additional involvement of butterfly Drug-induced erythroderma typically occurs
regions of the face and upper trunk can also be rapid and resolves quickly—on average 2–6 weeks
seen in early erythrodermic pemphigus foliaceus after discontinuation of the drug. Drug eruptions
[6]. The erythroderma in PRP classically appears that initially began as morbilliform, lichen planus-
as generalized salmon-colored erythema with like or urticarial may evolve into erythroderma [8].
islands of sparing (Fig. 7.2). Islands of sparing Nicolis et al. reported that erythroderma caused by
sulfonamides, penicillins, antimalarials, barbitu-
rates, arsenicals, and mercurials tended to have a
more severe clinical course. Fever appears to be
prominent in these cases, and moderate to severe
liver degeneration can occur [8]. Drug-induced
erythroderma due to dapsone or antileprosy agents
can mimic the clinical and histolopathologic fea-
tures of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. In this situa-
tion, the erythroderma resolves with withdrawal of
offending drugs [7].
7.3.5 Malignancy
seen in drug eruptions [99]. Identification of numer- tored if used to avoid nephrotoxicity in an
ous dilated blood vessels favors a diagnosis of erythrodermic patient [103]. Sedating oral anti-
benign inflammatory erythroderma [100]. histamines can enhance this effect and relieve
anxiety [5]. Patients require a warm and
humidified environment to increase comfort,
7.8 Treatment prevent hypothermia, and increase moisture to
the skin [29]. Diuretics may be needed to treat
All cases of erythroderma are considered a der- edema, and systemic antibiotics may be required
matological emergency, and hospitalization for secondary bacterial infections.
should be considered if fluid and electrolyte Patients who are refractory to topical therapy
imbalance or cardiovascular or respiratory should receive systemic therapy directed at the
comprise occur. Regardless of the underlying underlying etiology. First-line treatment for
etiology, the initial therapy for an erythrodermic erythrodermic psoriasis includes cyclosporine,
patient should focus on fluid, electrolyte, and infliximab, acitretin, and methotrexate with
nutritional management as well as gentle skin cyclosporine and infliximab being more rapidly
care measures. If a drug reaction has not been acting agents [104]. While systemic corticoster-
ruled out, all nonessential medications should oids should be avoided in patients with suspected
be discontinued if possible. Oatmeal baths and underlying psoriasis because of the potential to
wet dressings to weeping or crusted sites fol- induce a rebound flare, they are helpful in treat-
lowed by bland emollients and low-potency ing drug-induced and atopic dermatitis-related
topical corticosteroids can help to reduce erythroderma. Pityriasis rubra pilaris-induced
inflammation and pruritus [29]. High potency disease responds well to retinoids and methotrex-
corticosteroids should be avoided due to ate [5]. The best treatment regimen for Sézary
increased systemic absorption from the exten- syndrome depends on a variety of patient factors
sive surface area involvement and increased per- including burden of disease, impact on quality of
meability of erythrodermic skin [102]. Topical life, and rate of disease progression. Systemic
tacrolimus has also been shown to be systemi- therapies such as extracorporeal photopheresis,
cally absorbed and blood levels should be moni- interferon-a, bexarotene, low-dose methotrexate,
142 G. Heinecke and M. Lebwohl
21. Arslanpence I, Dede FS, Gokcu M, Gelisen O. 41. Paul C, Janier M, Carlet J, et al. Erythroderma induced by
Impetigo herpetiformis unresponsive to therapy in a teicoplanin. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1992;119:667–9.
pregnant adolescent. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 42. Gupta AK, Lynde CW, Lauzon GJ, et al. Cutaneous
2003;16:129–32. adverse effects associated with terbinafine therapy: 10
22. Tebbe B, Stavropoulos PG, Krasagakis K, Orfanos case reports and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol.
CE. Cutaneous mastocytosis in adults. Evaluation of 1998;138:529–32.
14 patients with respect to systemic disease manifes- 43. Just M, Carrascosa JM, Ribera M, Bielsa I, Ferrandiz C.
tations. Dermatology. 1998;197:101–8. Dideoxyinosine-associated Ofuji papuloerythroderma in
23. Zachariae H, Sogaard H. Progressive generalized per- an HIV-infected patient. Dermatology. 1997;195:410–1.
forating folliculitis. Dermatological. 1984;168:131–7. 44. Rietsema WJ. Fever, erythroderma, abdominal pain,
24. Kodym E, Kalinska R, Ehringfeld C, Sterbik-Lamina and renal failure following initiation of indinavir ther-
A, Kodym R, Hohenberg G. Frequency of radiation apy. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1268–9.
recall dermatitis in adult cancer patients. Onkologie. 45. Duque S, de la Puente J, Rodriguez F, Fernandez
2005;28:18–21. Pellon L, Maquiera E, Jerez J. Ziovudine-related
25. Mutasim DF. Severe subacute cutaneous lupus ery- erythroderma and successful desensitization: a case
thematosus presenting with generalized erythroderma report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;98:234–5.
and bullae. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:947–9. 46. Friedman B, Orlet HK, Still JM, Law E. Toxic epider-
26. Boyd AS, Menter A. Erythrodermic psoriasis. mal necrolysis due to administration of celecoxib
Precipitating factors, course and prognosis in 50 (Celebrex). South Med J. 2002;95:1213–4.
patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21:985–91. 47. Chan LK, Winearls CG, Oliver DO, Dunnill MS.
27. Goeckerman WH, O’Leary PA. Erythroderma psoriati- Acute interstitial nephritis and erythroderma associ-
cum. A review of 22 cases. JAMA. 1932;99:2102–5. ated with diflunisal. Br Med J. 1980;280:84–5.
28. Gaylor ML, Duvic M. Generalized pustular psoriasis 48. Bernedo N, Audicana MT, Uriel O, et al. Metamizol
following withdrawal of efalizsumab. J Drugs as a cause of postoperative erythroderma. Contact
Dermatol. 2004;3:77–9. Dermatitis. 2004;50:317–8.
29. Rothe MJ, Bernstein ML, Grant-Kels J. Life- 49. Stern RS, Bigby M. An expanded profile of cutaneous
threatening erythroderma: diagnosing and treating the reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Reports
“red man”. Clin Dermatol. 2005;23:206–17. to a specialty-bases system for spontaneous reporting of
30. Smith KJ, Decker C, Yeager J, Skelton HG, Baskin S. adverse reactions to drugs. JAMA. 1984;252:1433–7.
Therapeutic efficacy of carbamazepine in a HIV-1 50. Wittal RA, Fischer GO, Georgouras KE, Baird PJ.
positive patient with psoriatic erythroderma. J Am Skin reactions to diltiazem. Australas J Dermatol.
Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:851–4. 1992;33:11–8.
31. Shuster S, Marks J. Dermatopathic anaemia. Br J 51. Ahearn GS, Selim MA, Tapson VF. Severe erythro-
Dermatol. 1967;79:393–7. derma as a complication of continuous epoprostenol
32. Kannangara DW, Smith B, Cohen K. Exfoliative der- therapy. Chest. 2002;122:379–80.
matitis during cefoxitin therapy. Arch Intern Med. 52. Reynolds NJ, Jones SK, Crossley J, Harman RR.
1982;142:1031–2. Exfoliative dermatitis due to nifedipine. Br J Dermatol.
33. Tietze KJ, Gaska JA. Cefoxitin-associated exfoliative 1989;121:401–4.
dermatitis. Clin Pharm. 1983;2:582–4. 53. Cox NH, Gordon PM, Dodd H. Generalized pustular
34. Pavithran K. Exfoliative dermatitis after clofazimine. and erythrodermic psoriasis associated with bupro-
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1985;53:645–6. pion treatment. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:1061–3.
35. Patki AH, Menta JM. Dapsone-induced erythroderma 54. Hurley SC. Lamotrigine update and its use in mood
with Beau’s line. Lepr Rev. 1989;60:274–7. disorders. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:860–72.
36. Rao PN, Lakshmi TS. Increased in the incidence of 55. Fine JD, Breathnach SM. Distinctive eruption charac-
dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome—an appraisal. terized by linear supravenous papules and erythro-
Lepr Rev. 2001;72:57–62. derma following broxuridine (bromodeoxyuridine)
37. Batinac T, Zamolo G, Jonjic N, et al. therapy and radiotherapy. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:
Angioimmunoblastic lymphodenopathy with dyspro- 199–200.
teinemia following doxycycline administration. 56. Yantis PL, Bridges ME, Pittman FE. Cimetidine-
Tumori. 2003;89:91–5. induced exfoliative dermatitis. Dig Dis Sci.
38. Guin JD, Phillips D. Erythroderma from systemic 1980;25:73–4.
contact dermatitis: a complication of systemic gen- 57. Catlin DH, Sekera M, Adelman DC. Erythroderma
tamicin in a patient with contact allergy to neomycin. associated with ingestion of an herbal product. West I
Cutis. 1989;43:564–7. Med. 1993;159:491–3.
39. Khaled A, Sellami A, Fazaa B, Kharfi M, Zeglaoui F, 58. Cuxart M, Just M, Sans R. Generalized exfoliative
Kamoun MR. Acquired erythroderma in adults: a dermatitis caused by erythropoietin. Med Clin (Barc).
clinical and prognostic study. J Eur Acad Dermatol 2000;115:158.
Venereol. 2010;24:781–8. 59. Sparsa A, Bedane C, Benazahary H, et al. Drug hyper-
40. Puig LL, Abadia M, Alomar A. Erythroderma due to sensitive syndrome caused by fluidione. Ann Dermatol
ribostamycin. Contact Dermatitis. 1989;21:79–82. Venereol. 2001;128:1014–8.
144 G. Heinecke and M. Lebwohl
60. Wantzin GL, Thomsen K. A new cutaneous side effect low up of 38 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988;
of isotretinoin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;13:665. 18:1307–12.
61. Rebuck JA, Rybak MJ, Ramos DP, Weingarten CM. 77. Nishijima S. Papuloerythroderma associated with hepa-
Omeprazole-induced exfoliative dermatitis. tocellular carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:1115–6.
Pharmotherapy. 1998;18:877–9. 78. Axelrod JH, Herbold DR, Freel JH, Palmer SM.
62. Gonzalo-Garijo MA, Perez-Calderon R, de Argila D, Exfoliative dermatitis: a presenting sign of fallopian
Rodriguez-Nevado I. Erythroderma to pseudoephed- tube carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71:1045–7.
rine in a patient with contact allergy to phenylephrine. 79. Deffer TA, Overton-Keary PP, Goette DK.
Allergol Immunopathol. 2002;30:239–42. Erythroderma secondary to esophageal carcinoma. J
63. Shelley WB, Shelley ED. Chronic erythroderma Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;13:311–3.
induce by ®(beta)-blocker (timolol maleate) eye- 80. Harper TG, Latuska RF, Sperling HV. An unusual
drops. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:799–800. association between erythroderma and an occult gas-
64. Polyzos A, Tsavaris N, Kosmas C, et al. tric carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 1984;79:921–3.
Hypersensitivity reactions to carboplatin administra- 81. Thami GP, Sharma NL, Sharma A, Sharma RC.
tion are common but not always severe: a 10-year Exfoliative dermatitis and malignant melanoma: coin-
experience. Oncology. 2001;61:129–33. cidence or association. Int J Dermatol. 1996;35:682.
65. Lee TC, Hook CC, Long HJ. Severe exfoliative der- 82. Antony FC, Ardern-Jones M, Evans AV, Rosenbaum
matitis associated with hand ischemia during cisplatin T, Russell-Jones R. Giant condyloma of Buschke-
therapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69:80–2. Loewenstein in association with erythroderma. Clin
66. Asnis LA, Gaspari AA. Cutaneous reactions to recom- Exp Dermatol. 2003;28:46–9.
binant cytokine therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 83. Duncan SC, Winkelmann RK. Circulating Sézary
1995;33:393–410. cells in hospitalized dermatology patients. Br J
67. Bielsa I, Teixido J, Ribera M, Ferrandiz C. Dermatol. 1978;99:171–8.
Erythroderma due to thalidomide: report of two cases. 84. Zinzani PL, Ferreri AJ, Cerroni L. Mycosis fungoides.
Dermatology. 1994;189:179–81. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;65:172–82.
68. Hall VC, El-Azhary RA, Bouwhuls S, Rajkumar SV. 85. Wieselthier JS, Kohn HK. Sézary syndrome: diagno-
Dermatologicside effects of thalidomide in patients sis, prognosis, and critical review of treatment options.
with multiple myeloma. J Am Acad Dermatol. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:381–401.
2003;48:548–52. 86. Vonderheld EC, Bernengo MG, Burg G, et al. Update
69. De Coninck A, De Hou MF, Peters O, Van Camp B, on erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: Report
De Roseeuw DI. Aleukemic leukemia cutis. An of the international society for cutaneous lymphomas.
ususual presentation of acute myelomonocytic leuke- J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:95–106.
mia. Dermatologica. 1986;172:272–5. 87. Wilson DC, Jester JD, King LE. Erythroderma and
70. Hashizume H, Nakayama F, Oku T, Takigawa M. exfoliative dermatitis. Clin Dermatol. 1993;11:67–72.
Adult T-cell leukemia with regression of erythroderma 88. Satoh H, Yamashita YT, Ohtsuka M, Sekizawa K. Post-
and simultaneous emergence of leukemia. J Am Acad irradiation erythroderma. Clin Oncol. 2000;12:336.
Dermatol. 1992;27:846–9. 89. Ito K, Fujita M, Norioka M, et al. Postoperative eryth-
71. Granjo E, Lima M, Lopes JM, et al. Chronic eosino- roderma with change of HLA phenotypes from
philic leukaemia presenting with Erythroderma, mild heterozygotes to homozygotes: a report of two cases.
eosinophilia and hyper-IgE: clinical, immunological Eur J Haematol. 1991;46:217–22.
and cytogenetic features and therapeutic approach. A 90. Sigurdsson V, de Vries IJ, Toonstra J, et al. Expression
case report. Acta Haematol. 2002;107:108–12. of VCAM-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin, and P-selectin on
72. Artia K, Akiyama M, Sakai T, Shimizu H. Severely endothelium in situ in patients with erythroderma,
hyperkeratotic erythroderma associated with Hodgkin’s mycosis fungoides and atopic dermatitis. J Cutan
disease: does a high serum level of granulocyte-colony Pathol. 2000;27:436–40.
stimulating factor contribute to formation of skin 91. Sigurdsson V, Toonstra J, Bihari IC, Bruijnzeel-
lesions? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:772–3. Koomen CA, van Vloten WA, Thepen T. Interleukin 4
73. Leong AS, Cowled PA, Zalewski PD, Burry JN, and interferon-gamma expression of the dermal
Meredith DJ, Forbes IJ. Erythroderma, an unusual infiltrate in patients with erythroderma and mycosis
manifestation of B cell lymphoma. Br J Dermatol. fungoides. A immuno-histochemical study. J Cutan
1978;99(1):99–106. Pathol. 2000;27:429–35.
74. Denton K, Wilson CL, Venning VA. Primary cutane- 92. Kanthraj GR, Srinivas CR, Devi PU, et al. Quantitative
ous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma with a prolonged estimation and recommendations for supplementa-
erythrodermic prodrome. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126: tion of protein lost through scaling in exfoliative der-
297–300. matitis. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38:91–5.
75. Chu P, Aitchison R, Jones PA. Myelodysplasia present- 93. Hild DH. Folate losses from the skin in exfoliative
ing as erythroderma. Postgrad Med J. 1987;63:481–2. dermatitis. Arch Intern Med. 1969;123:51–7.
76. Thestrup-Pedersen K, Halkier-Sorensen L, Sogaard 94. Griffiths TW, Stevens SR, Cooper KD. Acute erythro-
H, Zachariae H. The red man syndrome. Exfoliative derma as an exclusion criterion for idiopathic CD4+ T
dermatitis of unknown etiology: a description and fol- lymphocytopenia. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:1530–3.
7 Erythroderma 145
95. Preesman AH, Schrooyen SJ, Toonstra J, et al. The 102. Aatlo-Korte K, Turpeinen M. Quantifying systemic
diagnostic value of morphometry on blood absorption of topical hydrocortisone in erythro-
lymphocytes in erythrodermic actinic reticuloid. derma. Br J Dermatol. 1995;133:403–8.
Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:1298–303. 103. Teshima D, Ikesue H, Itoh Y, Urabe K, Furue M,
96. Bakels V, van Oostveen JW, Preesman AH, Meijer Oishi R. Increased topical tacrolimus absorption in
CJ, Willemze R. Differentiation between actinic generalized leukemic erythroderma. Ann
reticuloid and cutaneous T cell lymphoma by T cell Pharmacother. 2003;37:1444–7.
receptor gamma gene rearrangement analysis and 104. Rosenbach M, Hsu S, Korman NJ, et al. Treatment
immunophenotyping. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:154–8. of erythrodermic psoriasis: from the medical board
97. Fraser-Andrews EA, Russell-Jones R, Woolford AJ, of the National Psoriasis Foundation. J Am Acad
Wolstencroft RA, Dean AJ, Whitttaker SJ. Diagnostic Dermatol. 2010;62:655–62.
and prognostic importance of T-cell receptor gene 105. Olsen EA, Rook AH, Zic J, et al. Sézary syndrome:
analysis in patients with Sézary syndrome. Cancer. immunopathogenesis, literature review of therapeu-
2001;92:1745–52. tic option and recommendations for therapy by the
98. Cherny S, Mraz S, Su L, Harvell J, Kohler S. United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium
Heteroduplex analysis of T-cell receptor gamma (USCLC). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:352–404.
gene rearrangement as an adjuvant diagnostic tool in 106. Tomi NS, Kranke B, Aberer E. Staphylococcal tox-
skin biopsies for erythroderma. J Cutan Pathol. ins in patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and
2001;28:351–5. erythroderma and in healthy control subjects. J Am
99. Walsh NM, Prokopetz R, Tron VA, et al. Histopathology Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:67–72.
in erythroderma: review of a series of cases by multiple 107. Green MS, Prystowsky JH, Cohen SR, Cohen JI,
observers. J Cutan Pathol. 1994;21:419–23. Lebwohl MG. Infectious complications of erythro-
100. Ram-Wolff C, Martin-Garcia N, Bensussan A, Bagot dermic psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34:
M, Ortonne N. Histopathologic diagnosis of lym- 911–4.
phomatous versus inflammatory erythroderma: a 108. Posner LE, Fossieck Jr BE, Eddy JL, Bunn Jr PA.
morphologic and phenotypic study on 47 skin biop- Septicemic complications of cutaneous T-cell lym-
sies. Am J Dermatopathol. 2010;32:755–63. phomas. Am J Med. 1981;71:210–6.
101. Zip C, Murray S, Walsh NM. The specificity of his- 109. Voigt GC, Kronthal HL, Crounse RG. Cardiac out-
topathology in erythroderma. J Cutan Pathol. 1993; put in erythrodermic skin disease. Am Heart J.
2:393–8. 1966;72:615–20.
Vesiculobullous Dermatoses
8
Michael W. Cashman, Daven Doshi,
and Karthik Krishnamurthy
branes. The pemphigus family can be divided is 2:1, whereas the majority of all cases (73%) are
into three major forms: pemphigus vulgaris, pem- due to vulgaris in France where the incidence is
phigus foliaceus, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. 1.7 cases per million per year [9].
Other pemphigus subtypes exist such as pemphi- The exact etiology of PV remains unknown;
gus vegetans and Fogo selvagem, all of which however, the interaction between environmental
will be reviewed in this chapter. Dysfunctional factors and genetic background is thought to con-
desmosomal proteins leading to acantholysis tribute to its development. Predisposition to PV is
within the epidermis with subsequent flaccid linked to genetic factors. For example, certain
blister formation characterize the pemphigus major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class
family of disorders. Epidermolysis bullosa is a II molecules, specifically the alleles of human
spectrum of inherited and acquired blistering dis- leukocyte antigen DR4 and DRw6, are more
eases; heritable keratin defects found in common in patients with PV [10–15]. Despite
Epidermalysis Bullosa Simplex lead to acanthol- this, predisposing genetic factors alone may not
ysis and will be discussed in this section, whereas be sufficient to trigger the autoimmune response
the remainder lead to subepidermal disease and seen [16]. Clinical evidence supports the role of
will be discussed later in this chapter. dietary factors in the exacerbation of pemphigus
[17, 18]. Suspected culprits capable of inducing
PV as reported in the literature include thiol com-
8.3 Pemphigus pounds (garlic, leek, chives) and phycocyanins
(Spirulina platensis alga) [18, 19]. Another cause
Before the advent of corticosteroids, pemphigus of pemphigus reported in the literature is medica-
was associated with a high mortality rate. Today, tions including thiol drugs, phenol drugs, and
pemphigus remains a possible dermatologic emer- nonthiol nonphenol drugs. The thiol drugs known
gency; however, with new therapeutics, mortality to cause pemphigus include captopril, pen-
rates have decreased, yet it still conveys significant icillamine, and gold. The phenol group includes
morbidity. The most classic form of pemphigus is culprits such as aspirin, rifampin, levodopa, and
pemphigus vulgaris (PV). PV is also known as heroin, while nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
“deep” pemphigus, as blisters develop in the drugs (NSAIDs), angiotensin converting enzyme
deeper portion of the epidermis just above the (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and
basal cell layer. Of the entire pemphigus family dipyrone are examples of nonthiol nonphenol
PV is the most potentially life threatening [5]. medications known to induce pemphigus [20].
The prevalence of pemphigus vulgaris in men In PV, blister formation is associated with IgG
and women is nearly equal and the mean age of antibodies against desmoglein 3 and 1, key adhe-
onset is 50–60 years, although the range is broad sion proteins found in both the skin and mucous
and disease arising in the elderly and children has membranes [20]. Patients with active disease have
been described [6]. Available data is limited in circulating and tissue-bound autoantibodies of
regards to the incidence of PV, although one both the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and immuno-
review cited an annual incidence of 0.42 per globulin G4 (IgG4) subclasses [21, 22].
100,000 [7]. In the general population, the inci- Autoantibody binding directly interferes with cell–
dence ranges from 0.76 to 5 new cases per mil- cell adhesion, leading to suprabasilar acantholysis.
lion per year. However, the incidence is much The target antigen affected—desmoglein 1 or 3
higher in people of Mediterranean, South Asian, (Dsg1 or Dsg3)—dictates the clinical phenotype
and Jewish ancestry, reported at 16–32 cases per seen in pemphigus. For example, individuals with
million per year [8]. PV is more common than the mucosal-dominant type of PV have only anti-
other forms of pemphigus such as pemphigus Dsg3 IgG autoantibodies, whereas patients with
foliaceus. In Japan with an incidence of 3.5 cases the mucocutaneous type of PV have both anti-
per million per year, the ratio of vulgaris to foliaceus Dsg1 and anti-Dsg3 IgG autoantibodies [23].
8 Vesiculobullous Dermatoses 149
All patients with PV have mucosal membrane substrate. An intercellular “fishnet” pattern of
erosions, and in 50–70% of patients, the disease IgG antibody and C3 deposition is virtually diag-
begins with the development of oral lesions [24]. nostic (Fig. 8.3). An indirect immunofluorescence
In acute PV, patients often present to the ER or (IIF) is not necessary for diagnosis; however, a
their primary care physician complaining of baseline is useful before therapy is initiated [25].
severe dysphagia. On physical exam, there are Antibody titer usually parallels disease activity in
usually ill-defined erosions of the lips, tongue, PV and can be used to track therapeutic response
buccal mucosa, gingiva, or hard/soft palate [28]. In the past 10 years, serum enzyme-linked
(Fig. 8.1) [25]. Those unfamiliar with PV may immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing has
diagnose the patient with herpes gingivostomati- become widely available for PV and has been
tis, apthous stomatitis, oral lichen planus, shown to be more sensitive than convential IIF
Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or traumatic ulcer- [29]. Similar to IIF titers, ELISA values may be
ation. In misdiagnosed and therefore untreated used to track disease activity [30].
PV, the oral erosions show little or no tendency to As previously mentioned, the diagnosis of PV
heal. This leads to hypoalimentation secondary to can be missed, as there are simulators of this dis-
patient fear of pain with eating and subsequent ease. The differential diagnosis for pemphigus
malnutrition and unintended weight loss. Other vulgaris includes distinguishing it from other
mucous membranes can be involved including variants of pemphigus including pemphigus foli-
the conjunctivae, nasal mucosa, esophagus, aceus and paraneoplastic pemphigus. Additionally,
vagina, penis, and anus [26]. More than half of all the differential can be divided into two main cat-
patients will also have cutaneous erosions and/or egories—only oral lesions present versus both
flaccid bullae. Common cutaneous locations oral and cutaneous lesions present. The list of
include the head, upper torso, and intertriginous diseases on the former includes aphthous stoma-
areas (Fig. 8.2) [25, 27]. titis, erythema multiforme, herpes simplex, ero-
In patients with suspected pemphigus vulgaris, sive lichen planus, and cicatricial pemphigoid,
a biopsy specimen for routine histology should while the latter differential includes Stevens-
be obtained from lesional skin. Histology findings Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis,
in PV include suprabasilar blister formation, bullous pemphigoid, linear IgA dermatitis, and
acantholysis, and minimal inflammation [25]. In epidermolysis bullosa acquisita.
addition to routine histology, a direct Before the advent of corticosteroids in the
immunofluorescence (DIF) of perilesional skin 1950s, pemphigus vulgaris had been a deadly
should be obtained against monkey esophagus disease with mortality rates between 90 and
150 M.W. Cashman et al.
Fig. 8.3 (a) Low power H&E view of Pemphigus Vulgaris showing suprabasilar acantholysis. (b) High power view
showing “tombstoning” of basilar keratinocytes. (c) Direct Immunofluorescence
100% of affected patients within 2 years of dis- abstention from food or drink for 30 min thereaf-
ease onset. Death largely resulted from sepsis ter. It should also be noted that patient should be
secondary to loss of skin barrier, leading to loss aware that these topical therapies are used off-
of body fluids or serving as a nidus for secondary label and products often claim “for external use
bacterial infections [31]. PV is almost universally only” [26]. A prosthetic device such as a dental
fatal in the absence of therapy, and studies dem- tray that fits over the teeth and gingiva can be
onstrate higher mortality among the elderly; fashioned by a dentist to make application of a
therefore, early intervention is essential [25]. topical corticosteroid preparation easier. When
With the vast array of treatment options available these topical medicines are applied under a den-
today including systemic glucocorticoids, non- tal tray their potency is increased [34]. There are
steroidal systemic immunosuppressives, biolog- few recognized adverse effects associated with
ics, and immunomodulatory procedures, mortality the use of topical corticosteroids in the oral cav-
is now less than 10% [32]. ity including oral candidiasis and reactivation of
If the disease appears nonprogressive and herpes simplex virus (HSV). The former can be
restricted to one body area such as the mouth, treated with antifungal agents such as clotrima-
topical therapy alone may be adequate [26]. zole lozenges five times per day for 1 week, nys-
Corticosteroid gels or ointments such as tatin swish and swallow four times per day until
fluocinonide, desoximetasone, or clobetasol can the patient is asymptomatic for 48 h, or oral
be initially used two to three times per day [33]. fluconazole dosed twice weekly. When HSV
Gels are often more easily applied and better tol- reactivation occurs, treatment with topical acy-
erated when used within the oral cavity. It should clovir six times per day for 1 week is appropriate
be advised that daily applications should initially with lesions limited to the oral cavity; however, if
occur two to three times per day when symptoms life-threatening HSV reactivation occurs intrave-
are severe and gradually tapered once relative nous acyclovir may be necessary. Intralesional
improvements are seen. Q-tip or fingertip appli- corticosteroid injections can be used in the treat-
cation is recommended, rubbing the gel or oint- ment of PV with some success using triamcino-
ment onto the affected areas gently for 30 s with lone 5–10 mg/mL every 2–4 weeks [26].
8 Vesiculobullous Dermatoses 151
Excellent oral care is integral in patients with tation for osteoporosis prophylaxis. Other adverse
PV. Such care includes gently brushing the teeth events to consider include steroid-induced glau-
twice daily using a soft-bristle toothbrush, daily coma or elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and
flossing, and professional teeth cleaning every osteonecrosis. While an every other day dosing
3–6 months [26]. Ahmed et al. have recom- schedule mitigates the occurrence of several ste-
mended gentle debridement of necrotic mucosal roid-induced side effects, it only decreases the risk
tissue to prevent infection [35]. Therefore, it is of cataract development without fully eliminating
important to have a dentist involved in those the risk, and does not affect the risk of osteoporo-
patients with PV. Topical analgesics or anesthet- sis/osteonecrosis at all [38].
ics and antiseptic mouthwashes are recommended A rapid response is usually noted once sys-
as further treatment. Various elixirs containing temic glucocorticoids are initiated; however, pro-
combinations of viscous lidcaine, diphenhy- longed therapy is often required to achieve
dramine, and antacids can be used as an oral rinse clearance. With a long course comes many side
to decrease mouth pain [35, 36]. Oral trauma can effects and the elderly are particularly susceptible
easily lead to new erosions and should be avoided to these adverse effects. As such, the manage-
as much as possible. Poorly fitted dentures, dry ment of elderly patients mandates the lowest
crackers, and hard candies have all been impli- effective dose of corticosteroids with early initia-
cated in giving rise to trauma of the oral mucosal tion of adjuvant therapy. Examples of adjuvant
surface [26]. therapies include immunosuppressive agents
Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay of such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil,
therapy and often first-line for PV, while immuno- and antibiotics such as dapsone. Such agents
suppressive agents are used to aid in disease remis- allow for a decreased dose of systemic corticos-
sion and decrease the need for long-term systemic teroid needed to achieve disease control and their
steroids. The goal of therapy is to control the dis- expedited tapering [26].
ease with the lowest possible dose of corticoster- Prior to initiating any systemic immunosup-
oids. Systemic corticosteroid therapy usually in pressive, a complete physical examination and
the form of oral prednisone is standard treatment. age-appropriate malignancy screening should be
Therapeutic effects are assessed by the number of performed. Baseline laboratory data may be help-
new blisters per day, and their rate of healing with ful in selecting a steroid-sparing agent. Monitoring
gradual tapering of prednisone. Once clinical for potential adverse effects include a complete
remission is obtained, changes in the titer of circu- blood count (CBC) with differential, serum
lating autoantibodies are helpful in estimating the chemistry, liver function tests (LFT), fasting lipid
dose of prednisone [37]. Should the disease flare at profile, urinalysis, tuberculin skin test, hepatitis
any point during the attempted taper, patients panel, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
should return to the steroid dose prior to the dis- (G6PD) enzyme level (for dapsone), and thiopu-
ease flare and be maintained at that dose for 4 rine methyltransferase (TPMT) enzyme level (for
weeks before attempting another taper. Patients azathioprine) [26]. Bone densitometry is indi-
with PV often require several months of high-dose cated for those patients on a daily dose of predni-
corticosteroid therapy before a taper can be sone 5 mg or more for longer than 6 months [38].
attempted, irrespective of whether adjuvant ther- Blood pressure, blood glucose, and stool guaiac
apy is administered. Therefore, patients should be should also be monitored [39]. Prophylaxis for
counseled at length on the adverse effects of sys- Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) should
temic corticosteroids. Treating physicians should be considered in patients on long-term oral corti-
protect against recognized sequelae of prolonged costeroids or other immunosuppressives with the
corticosteroid treatment [26]. Such precautions exception of dapsone [40]. However, recent data
include use of an H2-blocker or proton pump has shown that routine prophylaxis for PCP may
inhibitor for ulcer prophylaxis, as well as a bispho- not be necessary, recommending physicians who
sphonate and calcium with vitamin D supplemen- prescribe immunosuppressants for dermatologic
152 M.W. Cashman et al.
should not be prescribed in patients who take final adjunctive immunosuppressive cyclosporine
allopurinol unless unavoidable, since allopurinol is used concomitantly with prednisone in the
interferes with the metabolism of azathioprine treatment of pemphigus vulgaris [52]. Known
increasing plasma levels of 6-mercaptopurine, adverse effects include hypertension, nephrotox-
which may result in potentially fatal blood icity, hepatitis, and neurologic changes. With
dyscrasias. such a toxicity profile, cyclosporine should be
Mycophenolate mofetil is another adjuvant not considered first-line adjuvant therapy, but
immunosuppressive used to treat PV [26, 48]. may be used to achieve rapid initial control.
Similar to azathioprine, therapeutic effect takes Two final medications used to treat pemphigus
approximately 6–8 weeks; however, mycopheno- vulgaris—one more recently debuted, the other
late mofetil has less hepatotoxicity and myelo- more historic—are rituximab and gold. The for-
suppression, but more gastrointestinal toxicity mer has activity against tumor necrosis factor
than azathioprine [49]. Laboratory parameters alpha (TNF-a), and recently emerged as a choice
including CBC with differential and LFTs should for refractory cases to more standard immuno-
be checked regularly. Both azathioprine and suppressive therapy because of its ability to target
mycophenolate mofetil can be used in conjunc- plasma cell precursors responsible for antibody
tion with dapsone should the latter provide only production [25, 53]. Most patients respond within
partial control. 3 months after starting rituximab; however,
Cyclophosphamide is another adjunctive delayed response after a year of treatment has
immunosuppressive agent used to treat pemphi- been reported [54]. Its use is limited by cost, infu-
gus vulgaris. Its combination with systemic corti- sion route of delivery, and potential for serious
costeroids may result in gaining early control of immunosuppression and infection. Other biolog-
disease and increased percentage of clinical ics such as etanercept and infliximab have been
remissions [4, 50]. Although cyclophosphamide investigated in treating PV; however, results are
is still typically used in combination with sys- variable [25]. Gold has been used to treat mild to
temic corticosteroids, numerous case series have moderate cases of PV as monotherapy or with
reported utilizing it as monotherapy with clinical oral glucocorticoids [26]. Two early studies
effect in acute disease at doses of 50–200 mg/day reported complete remission in 15–44% in a total
[26]. Cyclophosphamide has a higher incidence of 44 PV patients; however, it was considered
of adverse effects including hemorrhagic cystitis, ineffective in 15–28% of patients, while 17–35%
infertility, and bladder cancer when compared to discontinued the due to side effects [55, 56]. Gold
azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil [26]. is rarely used today because of its delayed onset
Regular laboratory monitoring includes CBC of action, side effect profile, and relative ineffec-
with differential and urianalysis. Given its poten- tiveness compared to other treatments available.
tial risk of toxicity, it should only be used as Immunomodulatory procedures such as intra-
short-term therapy with transition to an alterna- venous immunoglobulin (IVIg), plasmapheresis
tive adjuvant once disease activity is controlled and extracorporeal photopheresis have all been
[51]. Furthermore, intravenous administration is employed in the management of pemphigus vul-
available in those patients who cannot tolerate garis. High-dose IVIg (2 g/kg per cycle) may be
oral intake. necessary in patients with rapidly progressive,
Methotrexate should be considered in patients extensive, or treatment resistant PV [26, 57].
where other adjuvant medications have failed or IVIg has a very rapid onset of action, and has
are contraindicated. The major adverse effect of been used with oral corticosteroids and an immu-
methotrexate is total cumulative dose-dependent nosuppressant drug in patients with refractory
hepatotoxicity. Additional side effects include PV; however, consensus on its efficacy remains
anemia, leukopenia, pulmonary toxicity, mucosi- controversial, as well as duration of treatment
tis, and nausea. Doses ranging from 10 to 17.5 mg [26]. Plasmapheresis plays a limited role in the
once weekly are typically used to treat PV. The management of PV, but can be considered in
154 M.W. Cashman et al.
difficult cases. Plasmapheresis is useful for steroids with longer remissions [59]. As such,
quickly reducing very high titers of autoantibod- morbidity and mortality is similar to PV for the
ies and should be considered in severe presen- Neumann subtype.
tations if unresponsive to a combination of
immunosuppressants and corticosteroids [32, 51].
Extracorporeal photopheresis has been used in 8.5 Pemphigus Foliaceus
patients with PV; however, clinical efficacy is
variable [26]. One final medication with cytokine- Like pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus
modulating effects recently reported in treating (PF) is one of the originally characterized classic
PV is thalidomide. The report showed it to be a forms of pemphigus. PF is generally a more
very effective treatment option deserving further benign variant; however, localized lesions tend to
evaluation. The recommendation was to consider persist for months to years carrying a significant
the use of this drug for patients in whom standard amount of morbidity for some patients. Although
therapy, IVIg, and rituximab have all failed [58]. PF is not often associated with considerable mor-
Table 8.1 outlines therapeutic options in the treat- tality, the disease can progress to erythroderma
ment of most autoimmune blistering diseases. (see Chap. 7) representing a true dermatological
emergency. These patients require prompt hospi-
talization to prevent serious and sometimes fatal
8.4 Pemphigus Vegetans complications from high output cardiac failure
and metabolic instability [62].
Pemphigus vegetans, a rare clinical variant of Sporadic PF is a rare disease accounting for
pemphigus vulgaris affecting 1–2% of patients, is 20–30% of pemphigus cases. Its incidence in the
thought to represent a reactive pattern of the skin USA and Europe is estimated at less than 1 case
to the autoimmune insult of PV. Pemphigus veg- per million inhabitants per year [61]. The preva-
etans is characterized by the occurrence of hyper- lence of PF is approximately equal between men
trophic, papillomatous, or verrucous vegetating and women affecting all races and ethnicities
skin lesions predominately involving the inter- with an average age of onset between 40 and 60
triginous areas [59, 60]. In general, flaccid blis- years old [62]. The epidemiologic statistics
ters become erosions with subsequent formation exhibit considerable variation when examining
of fungating vegetative plaques (Fig. 8.4). the endemic forms of PF as discussed later. The
Two clinical subtypes of pemphigus vegetans exact cause of sporadic PF remains unknown;
are recognized: the Neumann type and the however, extensive UV exposure, burns, and vari-
Hallopeau type. The former is more severe with ous drugs have all been implicated in its develop-
longstanding and refractory erosions that trans- ment. Penicillamine and captopril are the two
form into vegetating lesions, while the latter is a medications in particular that are associated with
milder presentation characterized by the initial PF, and in patients receiving penicillamine, PF is
appearance of pustules and rapid evolution to seen more commonly than PV with a ratio of
verrucous vegetative plaques with persistent approximately 4:1 [20]. Similar to PV, one dietary
peripheral pustules. Diagnosis may be difficult in factor has also been reported in giving rise to PF
patients with chronic vegetations, but the DIF seen in a patient taking herbal supplements with
staining is identical to that seen in classic PV phycocyanin [63]. An overlap syndrome exists
[61]. As in PV, systemic corticosteroids are the that exhibits characteristics of both PF and sys-
principal treatment for pemphigus vegetans. temic lupus erythematosus called Senear-Usher
Patients with the Neumann subtype have a simi- Syndrome or pemphigus erythematosus. The
lar disease course to PV, mandating higher ste- name was used to describe patients with overlap-
roid doses with multiple remissions and relapses, ping immunologic features of both diseases (IgG
while patients with the Hallopeau subtype have a and C3 deposition and circulating antinuclear
benign disease course, only needing low doses of antibodies); however, only a few patients have
8
Dapsone PV, PF, BP, MMP, LABD 125–150 mg/day Useful in mild cases
Start 25–50 mg/day and titrate slowly
100 mg/day is mean dose for disease control in
LABD but may need higher dose of 300 mg/day
Watch for G6PD deficiency, hemolysis, and
methemoglobinemia
Systemic corticosteroids (e.g., PV, PF, BP, PNP, PG, MMP, 0.75–1 mg/kg/day Usually initial therapy
prednisone) LABD Maintenance use in moderate to severe cases
Lower dose in PG and LABD at 0.5 mg/kg/day
Azathioprine PV, PF, BP, MMP 2–4 mg/kg/day Useful in severe cases
Steroid-sparing adjuvant
First-line adjuvant in MMP
Check TPMT levels
Care with concomitant use of Allopurinol
Cyclophosphamide PV, PF, BP, MMP 1–3 mg/kg/day Useful in severe cases
Steroid-sparing adjuvant;
Consider use in very aggressive cases as efficacy
achieved faster compared to other adjuvants
Risk of infertility and GU malignancy
Mycophenolate mofetil PV, PF, BP, MMP 2–3 g/day in two divided doses Useful in severe cases
Steroid-sparing adjuvant
Less hepatotoxic
Methotrexate PV, BP, MMP 7.5–20 mg/week Not commonly used but helpful in some patients
Steroid-sparing adjuvant
Cyclosporine PV, MMP 5 mg/kg/day Useful in severe cases
Steroid-sparing adjuvant
Topical formulation used in ocular MMP
155
(continued)
Table 8.1 (continued)
156
dermatitis is related to a higher morbidity and Hyperkeratosis on the soles and palms is also fre-
mortality seen in FS [62]. quently observed [61]. Therapeutics are similar
Fogo selvagem occurs with a high frequency in to those used in PF.
Central and Southwestern Brazil where as many
as 50 cases per million per year are seen. Some
endemic regions of Brazil exhibit a prevalence 8.7 Paraneoplastic Pemphigus
equal to 3% of the population, where the ratio of
FS to PV is 17:1 [72]. FS affects a larger number Of the entire pemphigus family, paraneoplastic
of children and young adults without sex predilec- pemphigus (PNP) is the most severe [76]. PNP
tion as symptoms usually begin during the second carries significant morbidity and mortality, par-
or third decade of life [62]. Another focus of tially due to development in the setting of malig-
endemic PF exists in the northern part of Columbia. nancy and also the associated often extensive
The prevalence of Columbian PF is close to 5% mucosal involvement. When PNP is associated
and greater than 95% of those affected are men with malignancy, mortality is estimated at 93%
[61]. A third focus of endemic PF has also been usually from sepsis, bronchiolitis obliterans, or
described in Tunisia. There, the overall incidence progression of the underlying malignancy [25].
is 6–7 cases per million per year; however, the Epidemiological data on the prevalence and
incidence dramatically increases up to 20 cases incidence of PNP is scarce. One review reported
per million per year in some areas in south Tunisia, approximately 150 cases in the literature 10 years
particularly affecting young adult women from 25 ago. The age range for PNP is from 7 to 83 years,
to 34 years old as evidenced by a female to male although the majority of patients are between the
ratio of 4:1 [61, 62]. ages of 45 and 70 years [77]. The mean age at onset
The exact cause of fogo selvagem is unknown. is 60 years without predilection of sex or race. PNP
FS frequently occurs in genetically related family occurs in the setting of malignancy including, in
members, and more than 50% of normal individ- decreasing order of frequency, non-Hodgkin lym-
uals in certain areas of Brazil have antidesmog- phoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Castleman
lein 1 IgG autoantibodies [73]. In addition to disease, thymoma, Waldenstrom macroglobuline-
genetic propensity, FS is thought to be triggered mia, and spindle-cell sarcomas [25].
by the bite of an insect, where antibodies pro- PNP patients display autoantibodies to des-
duced against this unidentified antigen may moglein 1 and 3, as well as desmosomal proteins
cross-react with desmoglein 1 in genetically sus- of the plakin family including desmoplakin I and
ceptible individuals, leading to the development II, envoplakin, periplakin, plectin, BP antigen
of FS [62]. More recent research has focused on 230, and a 170-kDa protein that has not been fur-
the study of a protein transmitted from the saliva ther identified [25, 78]. DIF reveals IgG, C3, or
of Simulium nigrimanum, a type of black fly both in an intercellular pattern like PV, but in
[74]. Dietary factors have also been implicated as addition, linear/granular IgG or C3 may be pres-
increased amounts of tannins dissolved in the ent at the basement membrane zone. Results of
water systems directly serving Amazonian natives IIF are similar to PV but autoantibodies may also
could explain the occurrence of FS in Amazonian demonstrate binding to simple or transitional epi-
Brazil [75]. thelium substrates like rodent bladder, which is
The target antigen in fogo selvagem is des- considered unique and diagnostic of PNP [25].
moglein 1 with similar DIF and IIF staining pat- Severe involvement of multiple mucous mem-
terns as seen in PF. Clinically, patients with FS branes is the major clinical feature and hallmark of
exhibit the same characteristics as patients with this disease. The most constant clinical feature is
PF. Some patients with chronic disease may severe and intractable stomatitis consisting of
develop verrucous plaques on the trunk and erosions and ulcerations that affects all surfaces of
extremities, which have also been described in the oropharynx, characteristically extending to
patients with Columbian endemic pemphigus. the vermilion lip (Fig. 8.6) [25, 77]. Mucosal
8 Vesiculobullous Dermatoses 159
The bullae are similar to those found in BP—tense to 66 years [25, 109]. However, MMP has also
with serous fluid and often leaving widespread been reported in children [26]. The incidence of
erosions. The entire skin surface can be involved, MMP is estimated to be between 1 in 12,000 and
but the face, palms, soles, and mucous membranes 1 in 20,000 in the general population. Although
are usually spared [108]. Systemic corticosteroids no geographic or racial predilection has been
are the cornerstone of therapy and most patients described, several studies have demonstrated an
respond to prednisone 0.5 mg/kg/day. Maintenance increased risk in patients with an HLA-DQw7
therapy is generally held at a lower dose and may haplotype [109]. No specific diseases or predis-
not even be required throughout gestation depend- posing factors have been noted in association
ing on response. Interestingly, many patients will with MMP, with the exception of colon cancer in
experience spontaneous disease regression during patients with antilaminin 5 (epiligrin) MMP [101].
the third trimester, only to experience a flare dur- Laboratory evidence suggests that the autoan-
ing childbirth [102]. tibodies in MMP can target multiple different
Many pregnant women become concerned structural components of the extracellular por-
with the risks of systemic steroids on fetal well- tions of the hemidesmosomal adhesion complex
being, and these apprehensions should be appro- in the skin and mucosal surfaces [25]. The vari-
priately addressed. There is an increased ous target antigens can include BP180, BP230,
inclination to develop fetal risks such as small for laminin 5, laminin 6, and integrin alpha-6/beta-4
gestational age and prematurity suggesting a low- subunit [25, 26]. Patients with antibodies against
grade placental insufficiency; however, it has the integrin subunits predominantly exhibit ocu-
recently been shown that these risks seem to be lar disease. Patients with antibodies against lami-
more associated with antibodies binding to the nin 5 have no specific phenotype, and whereas
placenta rather than the effect of systemic ste- those with BP180 autoantibodies can exhibit
roids. The other potential risk to consider is adre- cutaneous involvement [25].
nal insufficiency, especially in those women Similar to BP, immunofluorescence studies are
treated with systemic steroids over longer periods the gold standard for diagnosis. Biopsy for DIF is
of time; however, the maternal–fetal gradient of best obtained from perilesional uninvolved
prednisone is only 10:1 and fetal adrenal sup- mucosa such as the lower labial mucosa which is
pression is only a rare consequence [102]. easily accessible [25]. In general, MMP is charac-
terized by the linear deposition of IgG, IgA, and/
or C3 along the epidermal BMZ in mucosal and/
8.12 Mucous Membrane (Cicatricial) or cutaneous biopsy specimens [26]. IIF is posi-
Pemphigoid tive in approximately 20–30% of cases in contrast
to the much higher detection rate seen in BP [25].
Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a Given the lower detection rate with IIF on human
chronic inflammatory subepidermal blistering split skin, western blotting, immunoprecipitation,
disease. MMP is characterized by the presence of and ELISA using various cell-derived and recom-
antibodies targeting subepidermal BMZ struc- binant proteins are pivotal diagnostic tools for
tural components of mucosal surfaces. The mor- MMP. Despite a low detection rate, laminin 5
bidity and mortality for this disease are significant, detected on the dermal side of salt split skin dif-
and serious sequelae can develop including scar- ferentiates it from all other pemphigoids [65].
ring and fibrosis of the involved mucous mem- The diagnosis of MMP should be entertained in
branes [25]. The disease course is often slow and patients with erosive or blistering mucosal lesions,
progressive interrupted with periods of explosive especially if evidence of scarring is present.
inflammatory activity. Erythema multiforme, erosive lichen planus, and
MMP is rare but most often affects elderly PV should be considered and can be differentiated
individuals with a 2:1 female preponderance aged by histology and immunofluorescence studies. BP,
60–80 years, and an average age ranging from 62 epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and linear IgA
164 M.W. Cashman et al.
the former on histology. Inflammatory EBA is a standard immunosuppressant agents such as cor-
great mimicker of BP; thus, the distinction ticosteroids, azathioprine, and methotrexate have
between the two can only be made with been used with varying success [25]. In addition,
immunofluorescence studies and clinical course. variable efficacy has been reported in using pho-
DIF microscopy reveals linear deposits of IgG topheresis, infliximab, or high-dose IVIg.
along the BMZ, with variable presence of linear
C3, IgA, and IgM. The intensity of IgG is gener-
ally greater than the other substrates [25]. IIF can 8.15 Junctional and Dystrophic
be useful in differentiating EBA from BP since Epidermolysis Bullosa
circulating IgG antibodies along the dermal side
of salt-split skin can only be detected in 10–30% Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) and dys-
of cases of EBA [25, 139]. Furthermore, a more trophic epidermolysis bullosa represent the two
sensitive ELISA for the detection of antibodies other major types of inherited EB. The main
against type VII collagen is also available [129]. focus will include the JEB-Herlitz subtype and
The differential diagnosis of classic EBA the recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB) subtype in
includes variants of porphyria, pseudoporphyria, particular. According to a National Epidermolysis
and hereditary forms of epidermolysis bullosa, Bullosa Registry report, 50 EB cases occur per
while inflammatory EBA must be distinguished one million live births, and of these cases 5% are
from BP, LABD, MMP, bullous drug eruptions, classified as dystrophic while only 1% are
and bullous lupus [25]. Disruption of type VII classified as junctional [141]. All subtypes of
collagen function results in the clinical manifes- JEB are transmitted in an autosomal recessive
tations seen with this disease and also found dis- manner, while dystrophic EB is transmitted in
rupted in bullous lupus, although the latter often either an autosomal dominant or autosomal
presents with a known history or other signs or recessive manner. Evidently, RDEB is transmit-
symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus. ted in an autosomal recessive fashion. The most
Patients with classic EBA present with blisters, severe subtype of JEB is JEB-Herlitz, which
arising in areas of the skin where frequent and leads to a mutation in the protein subunits of
minor trauma can occur on noninflammed skin laminin 5, a key component of the lamina lucida
including the dorsum of the hands, knuckles, of the dermo-epidermal junction [142]. RDEB
elbows, knees, sacral area, and feet. Healing usually results in a mutation within the type VII
results in scarring and milia formation [25]. collagen gene [143].
Approximately half of all patients present with Similar to the clinical features seen in EB sim-
inflammatory EBA, which constitutes a vesicu- plex, JEB and RDEB also exhibit mechanically
lobullous eruption most prominent over the trunk fragile skin tense fluid-filled blisters, erosions,
and flexural skin. As opposed to classic EBA, and crusts at birth with subsequent atrophic scar-
skin fragility is not a characteristic feature of ring (Fig. 8.13). A unique characteristic of JEB-
inflammatory EBA with minimal to absent scar Herlitz includes excessive granulation tissue
and milia formation. Mucous membrane involve- usually in a symmetric distribution involving
ment can occur either exclusively or with cutane- periorifacial skin, axillary vaults, and the upper
ous lesions, making it very difficult to clinically back and nape of the neck [144]. It is practically
distinguish from MMP [25, 140]. impossible to make a strict clinical diagnosis
Treatment of EBA is both challenging and comparing the several entities of epidermolysis
often unsatisfactory, as no clear therapeutic lad- bullosa; therefore, TEM is also used to aid in the
ders have been established. Prevention of blister diagnosis of JEB and RDEB as seen in EB sim-
formation through avoidance of trauma and plex. An exact diagnosis is preferred because
prompt attention to ulcerations is extremely each entity of epidermolysis bullosa carries dif-
important in order to reduce the possibility of ferent prognoses, unique morbidities, and specific
secondary infection. Dapsone, colchicine, and management strategies.
168 M.W. Cashman et al.
37. Amagai M, Komai A, Hashimoto T, et al. Usefulness 54. Niedermeier A. Delayed response of oral pemphigus
of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) vulgaris to rituximab treatment. Eur J Dermatol.
using recombinant esmogleins 1 and 3 for serodiagno- 2006;16:266–70.
sis of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140:351–7. 55. Pandya AG, Dyke C. Treatment of pemphigus with
38. Khan YK, Kalaaji AN, Clarke BL. Prevention and gold. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:1104–7.
treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in 56. Penneys NS, Eaglstein WH, Frost P. Management of
dermatologic practice: a review. J Drugs Dermatol. pemphigus with gold compounds. A long-term fol-
2008;7:2–8. low-up report. Arch Dermatol. 1976;112:185–7.
39. Toth GG, Jonkman MF. Therapy of pemphigus. Clin 57. Jolles S. A review of high-dose intravenous immuno-
Dermatol. 2001;19:761–7. globulin (hdIVIg) in the treatment of the autoimmune
40. Gerhart J, Kalaaji A. Development of Pneumocystis blistering disorders. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:
carinii pneumonia in patients with immunobullous 127–31.
and connective tissue disease receiving immunosup- 58. Lee F. Longterm clinical remission of oral and cutane-
pressive medications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010; ous pemphigus with thalidomide. Int J Dermatol.
62(6):957–61. 2011;50:1120–3.
41. Lehman JS, Kalaaji AN. Role of primary prophy- 59. Ahmed AR, Blose DA. Pemphigus vegetans. Neumann
laxis for pneumocystis pneumonia in patients treated type and Hallopeau type. Int J Dermatol. 1984;23:
with systemic corticosteroids or other immunosup- 135–41.
pressive agents for immune-mediated dermatologic 60. Becker BA, Gaspari AA. Pemphigus vulgaris and
conditions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63(5): vegetans. Dermatol Clin. 1993;11:429–52.
815–23. 61. Joly P, Litrowski N. Pemphigus group (vulgaris, veg-
42. Rogers RS, Mehregan DA. Dapsone therapy of cica- etans, foliaceus, herpetiformis, brasiliensis). Clin
tricial pemphigoid. Semin Dermatol. 1988;7:201–5. Dermatol. 2011;29:432–6.
43. Hornsten P, Keisu M, Wiholm B. The incidence of 62. James KA, Culton DA, Diaz LA. Diagnosis and clini-
agranulocytosis during treatment of dermatitis herpe- cal features of pemphigus foliaceus. Dermatol Clin.
tiformis with dapsone as reported in Sweden, 1972 2011;29(3):405–12.
through 1988. Arch Dermatol. 1990;126:919–22. 63. Kraigher O, Wohl Y, Gat A, Brenner S. A mixed
44. Raizman MB, Fay AM, Weiss JS. Dapsone-induced immunoblistering disorder exhibiting features of
neutropenia in patients treated for ocular cicatricial bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus foliaceus associ-
pemphigoid. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1805–7. ated with Spirulina algae intake. Int J Dermatol.
45. Aberer W, Wolff SE, Stingl G, Wolff K. Azathioprine 2008;47:61–3.
in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. A long-term 64. Steffen C, Thomas D. The men behind the eponym:
follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;16:527–33. Francis E. Senear, Barney Usher, and the Senear-
46. Roenigk HH, Deodar S. Pemphigus treatment with Usher syndrome. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003;25(5):
azathioprine. Arch Dermatol. 1973;107:353–7. 432–6.
47. Nousari HC, Anhalt GJ. The role of mycophenolate 65. Schmidt E. Zillikens D Modern diagnosis of autoim-
mofetil in the management of pemphigus. J Am Acad mune blistering skin diseases. Autoimmun Rev.
Dermatol. 1999;135:853–4. 2010;10:84–9.
48. Beissert S, Werfel T, Frieling U, et al. A comparison 66. Grando SA. New approaches to the treatment of pem-
of oral methylprednisolone plus azathioprine or myco- phigus. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004;9(1):
phenolate mofetil for the treatment of pemphigus. 84–91.
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:1447–54. 67. Gupta R. Prolonged remission of pemphigus induced
49. Kirtschig G, Khumalo NP. Management of bullous by dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy.
pemphigoid: recommendations for immunomodula- Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007;73(2):
tory treatments. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004;5:319–26. 121–2.
50. Fellner MJ, Katz JM, McCabe JB. Successful use of 68. Katz KH, Marks Jr JG, Helm KF. Pemphigus folia-
cyclophosphamide and prednisone for initial treat- ceus successfully treated with mycophenolate mofetil
ment of pemphigus vulgaris. Arch Dermatol. as a steroid-sparing agent. J Am Acad Dermatol.
1978;114:889–94. 2000;42(3):514–5.
51. Harman KE, Albert S, Black MM. Guidelines for the 69. Dumas V, Roujeau JC, Wolkenstein P, Revuz J,
management of pemphigus vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. Cosnes A. The treatment of mild pemphigus vulgaris
2003;149:926–36. and pemphigus foliaceus with a topical corticosteroid.
52. Ioannides D, Chrysomallis F, Bystryn JC. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(6):1127–9.
Ineffectiveness of cyclosporine as an adjuvant to cor- 70. Cianchi G, Lembo L, Colonna L, et al. Pemphigus
ticosteroids in the treatment of pemphigus. Arch foliaceus induced by radiotherapy and responsive to
Dermatol. 2000;136:868–72. dapsone. J Dermatolog Treat. 2006;17(4):244–6.
53. El Tal AK, Posner MR, Spigelman Z, Ahmed AR. 71. Friedman H, Campbell I, Rocha-Alvarez R, et al.
Rituximab: a monoclonal antibody to CD20 used in Endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem) in
the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad native Americans from Brazil. J Am Acad Dermatol.
Dermatol. 2006;55:449–59. 1995;32:949–56.
8 Vesiculobullous Dermatoses 171
72. Warren SJ, Lin MS, Giudice GJ, et al. The prevalence 88. Schmidt E, Zillikens D. Autoimmune and inherited
of antibodies against desmoglein 1 in endemic pem- subepidermal blistering diseases: advances in the
phigus foliaceus in Brazil. Cooperative Group on clinic and the laboratory. Adv Dermatol. 2000;16:
Fogo Selvagem Research. N Engl J Med. 2000; 113–57.
343(1):23–30. 89. Hall WH, Ramachandran R, Narayan S, et al. An
73. Li N, Aoki V, Hans-Filho G, et al. The role of intra- electronic application for rapidly calculating Charlson
molecular epitope spreading in the pathogenesis of comorbidity score. BMC Cancer. 2004;4:94.
endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem). J Exp 90. Jassal SV, Chiu E, Hladuewich M. Loss of indepen-
Med. 2003;197:1501–10. dence of patients starting dialysis at 80 years of age
74. Ribeiro JM, Valenzuela JG, Pham VM, et al. An or older. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1612–3.
insight into the sialotranscriptome of Simulium nigri- 91. Posner BM, Jette AM, Smith KW, et al. Nutrition
manum, a black fly associated with fogo selvagem in and health risks in the elderly: the nutrition screen-
South America. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82: ing initiative. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:972–8.
1060–75. 92. Marazza G, Pham HC, Scharer L, et al. Incidence of
75. Tur E, Brenner S, Lombardi ML. A case of diet- bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus in Switzerland:
related pemphigus. Dermatology. 1996;192:373–4. a 2-year prospective study. Br J Dermatol.
76. Anhalt GJ, Kim S, Stanley JR, et al. Paraneoplastic 2009;161:861–8.
pemphigus. An autoimmune mucocutaneous disease 93. Delgado JC, Turbay D, Yunis EJ, et al. A common
associated with neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 1990;323: major histocompatibility complex class II allele
1729–35. HLA-DQB1*0301 is present in clinical variants of
77. Kimyal-Asadi A. Jih MH Paraneoplastic pemphigus. pemphigoid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:
Int J Dermatol. 2001;40(6):367–72. 8569–71.
78. Amgai M, Nishikawa T, Nousari HC, et al. Antibodies 94. Nozu T, Mita H. Bullous pemphigoid and percutane-
against desmoglein 3 (pemphigus vulgaris antigen) ous endoscopic gastrostomy. Intern Med. 2010;49:
are present in sera from patients with paraneoplastic 971–5.
pemphigus and cause acantholysis in vivo in neonatal 95. Sheerin N, Bourke JF, Holder J, North J, Burns DA.
mice. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:775–82. Bullous pemphigoid following radiotherapy. Clin
79. Anhalt GJ. Paraneoplastic pemphigus. J Invest Exp Dermatol. 1995;20:80–2.
Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004;9:29–33. 96. Balato N, Ayala F, Patruno C, Turco P, Ruocco V.
80. Fine JD, Eady RAJ, Bauer EA, et al. Revised Bullous pemphigoid induced by a thermal burn. Int J
classification system for inherited epidermolysis Dermatol. 1994;33:55–6.
bullosa: report of the Second International Consensus 97. Parslew R, Verbov JL. Bullous pemphigoid at sites
Meeting on diagnosis and classification of epider- of trauma. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:825–6.
molysis bullosa. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42: 98. Khandpur S, Verma P. Bullous pemphigoid. Indian J
1051–66. Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(4):450–5.
81. Fuchs E, Coulombe P, Cheng J, et al. Genetic bases of 99. Barnadas M, Rubiales V, Gonzalez J, et al. Enzyme-
epidermolysis bullosa simplex and epidermolytic linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and indirect
hyperkeratosis. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;103(S): immunofluorescence testing in a bullous pemphig-
25–30. oid and pemphigoid gestationis. Int J Dermatol.
82. Haynes L. Nutritional support for children with epi- 2008;47:1245–9.
dermolysis bullosa. Br J Nurs. 2006;15:1097–101. 100. Joly P, Roujeau JC, Benichou J, et al. A comparison of
83. Gruskay DM. Nutritional management in the child oral and topical corticosteroids in the treatment of
with epidermolysis bullosa. Arch Dermatol. patients with bullous pemphigoid: a multicenter ran-
1988;124:760–1. domized study. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1681–7.
84. Fine JD, Johnson LB, Weiner M, et al. Gastrointestinal 101. Egan CA, Lazarova Z, Darling TN, et al. Anti-
complications of inherited epidermolysis bullosa: epiligrin cicatricial pemphigoid and relative risk for
cumulative experience of the National Epidermolysis cancer. Lancet. 2001;357:1850–1.
Bullosa Registry. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 102. Roth MM. Pregnancy dermatoses, diagnosis man-
2008;46:147–58. agement and controversies. Am J Clin Dermatol.
85. Gamelli RL. Nutritional problems of the acute and 2011;12(1):25–41.
chronic burn patient. Relevance to epidermolysis 103. Djahansouzi S, Nestle-Kraemling C, Dall P, et al.
bullosa. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:756–9. Herpes gestationis may present itself as a paraneo-
86. Retief CR, Malkinson FD, Pearson RW. Two familial plastic syndrome of choriocarcinoma-a case report.
cases of epidermolysis bullosa simplex successfully Gynecol Oncol. 2003;89(2):334–7.
treated with tetracycline. Arch Dermatol. 104. do Valle Chiossi MP, Costa RS, Ferreira Roselino
1999;135:997–8. AM. Titration of herpes gestationis factor fixing to C3
87. Fine JD, Eady RAJ. Tetracycline and epidermolysis in pemphigoid herpes gestationis associated with cho-
bullosa simplex-a new indication for one of the oldest riocarcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 2000; 136(1):129-30.
and most widely used drugs in dermatology. Arch 105. Yancey KB. Herpes gestationis. Dermatol Clin.
Dermatol. 1999;135:981–2. 1990;8:727–34.
172 M.W. Cashman et al.
106. Jenkins RE, Hern S, Black MM. Clinical fea- and immunopathologic overlap. J Am Acad
tures and management of 87 patients with pem- Dermatol. 1988;19(5):792–805.
phigoid gestationis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 123. Esterly NB, Furey NL, Kirschner BS, et al. Chronic
1999;24:255–9. bullous dermatosis of childhood. Arch Dermatol.
107. Paunescu MM, Feier V, Paunescu M. Dermatoses of 1977;113:42–6.
pregnancy. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Panonica 124. Provost TT, Maize JC, Ahmed AR, et al. Unusual
Adriat. 2008;17(1):4–11. subepidermal bullous diseases with immunologic
108. Shornick JK. Herpes gestationis. J Am Acad features of bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol.
Dermatol. 1987;17:539–56. 1979;115:156–60.
109. Yunis JJ, Mobini N, Yunis EJ, et al. Common major 125. Wojnarowska F, Marsden RA, Bhogal B, et al.
histocompatibility complex class II markers in clini- Childhood cicatricial pemphigoid with linear IgA
cal variants of cicatricial pemphigoid. Proc Natl deposits. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1984;9:407–15.
Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:7747–51. 126. Kuechle MK, Stegemeir E, Maynard B, et al. Drug-
110. Chan LS, Ahmed AR, Anhalt GF, et al. The first induced linear IgA bullous dermatosis: report of six
international consensus on mucous membrane pem- cases and review of the literature. J Am Acad
phigoid. Arch Dermatol. 2002;43:571–91. Dermatol. 1994;30:187–92.
111. Foster CS. Cicatricial pemphigoid. Trans Am 127. Mobacken H, Kastrup W, Ljundhall K, et al. Linear
Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;85:527–663. IgA dermatosis: a study of ten adult patients. Acta
112. Ahmed AR, Colon JE. Comparison between IVIG Derm Venereol. 1983;63:123–8.
and conventional immunosuppressive therapy regi- 128. Dabrowski J, Chorzelski TP, Jablonska S, et al.
mens in patients with severe oral pemphigoid. Arch Immunoelectron microscopic studies in IgA linear
Dermatol. 2001;137:1181–9. dermatosis. Arch Dermatol Res. 1979;265:289–98.
113. Ahmed AR, Dahl MV. Consensus statement on the 129. Chen M, Chan LS, Cai X, et al. Development of an
use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in the ELISA for rapid detection of anti-type VII collagen
treatment of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering autoantibodies in epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J
diseases. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1051–9. Invest Dermatol. 1997;108:68–72.
114. Canizares MJ, Smith DI, Conners MS, et al. 130. Leonard JN, Haffenden GP, Ring NP, et al. Linear
Successful treatment of mucous membrane pemphi- IgA disease in adults. Br J Dermatol. 1982;107:
goid with etanercept in 3 patients. Arch Dermatol. 301–16.
2006;142:1457–61. 131. Wieme N, Lambert J, Moerman M, et al. Epidermolsis
115. Sacher C, Rubbert A, Konig C, et al. Treatment of bullosa acquisita with combined features of bullous
recalcitrant cicatricial pemphigoid with the tumor pemphigoid and cicatrical pemphigoid. Dermatology.
necrosis factor alpha antagonist etanercept. J Am 1999;198:310–3.
Acad Dermatol. 2022;46:113–5. 132. Zillikens D, Wever S, Roth A, et al. Incidence of
116. Hefferman MP, Bentley DD. Successful treatment of autoimmune subepidermal blistering dermatoses in a
mucous membrane pemphigoid with infliximab. region of central Germany. Arch Dermatol.
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:1268–70. 1995;131:957–8.
117. Ross A, Jaycock P, Cook S, et al. The use of ritux- 133. Nanda A, Dvorak R, Al-Saeed K, et al. Spectrum of
imab in refractory mucous membrane pemphigoid autoimmune bullous diseases in Kuwait. Int J
with severe ocular involvement. Br J Ophthalmol. Dermatol. 2004;43:876–81.
2009;93:421–2. 134. Wong SN, Chua SH. Spectrum of subepidermal
118. Schumann T, Schmidt E, Booken N, et al. Successful immunobullous disorders seen at the National Skin
treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid with Centre Singapore: a 2-year review. Br J Dermatol.
the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Acta Derm 2002;147:476–80.
Venereol. 2009;89:101–2. 135. Gammon WR. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita.
119. Taverna JA, Lerner A, Bhawan J, et al. Successful Semin Dermatol. 1988;7:218–24.
adjuvant treatment of recalcitrant mucous membrane 136. Zumelzu C, Le Roux-Villet C, Loiseau P, et al. Black
pemphigoid with anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. J patients of African descent and HLA-DRB1*15:03
Drugs Dermatol. 2007;6:731–2. frequency overrepresented in epidermolysis bullosa
120. Duong DJ, Moxley RT, Kellman RM, et al. acquisita. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:2386–93
Thalidomide therapy for cicatricial pemphigoid. J [Epub ahead of print].
Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:S193–5. 137. Hallel-Halevy D, Nadelman C, Chen M, et al.
121. Donnenfelt ED, Perry HD, Wallerstein A, et al. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita update and review.
Subconjunctival mitomycin C for the treatment of Clin Dermatol. 2001;19:712–18.
ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Ophthalmology. 138. Woodley DT, Briggaman RA, O’Keefe EJ, et al.
1999;106:72–8. Identification of the skin basement membrane
122. Wojnarowska F, Marsden RA, Bhogal B, Black MM. autoantigen in epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. N
Chronic bullous disease of childhood, childhood Engl J Med. 1984;310:1007–13.
cicatricial pemphigoid, and linear IgA disease of 139. Gammon WR, Kowalwski C, Chorzelski TP, et al.
adults. A comparative study demonstrating clinical Direct immunofluorescence studies of sodium
8 Vesiculobullous Dermatoses 173
chloride-separated skin in the differential diagnosis 148. Melville C, Atherton D, Burch M, et al. Fatal
of bullous pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa cardiomyopathy in dystrophic epidermolysis
aquisita. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:664–70. bullosa. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135:603–6.
140. Caux F, Kirtschig G, Lemarchand-Venencie F, et al. 149. Fine JD, Johnson LB, Weiner M, Suchindran C.
IgA epidermolysis bullosa aquisita in a child result- Tracheolaryngeal complications of inherited epider-
ing in blindness. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:270–5. molysis bullosa (EB): experience of the National EB
141. Fine JD, Bauer EA, McGuire J, Moshell A, editors. registry. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(9):1652–60.
Epidermolysis bullosa: clinical, epidemiologic, and 150. Fine JD, Johnson LB, Suchindran C, et al. Cancer
laboratory advances and the findings of the National and inherited epidermolysis bullosa: lifetable analy-
Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry. Baltimore, MD: ses of the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry
Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999. study population. In: Fine JD, Bauer EA, McGuire J,
142. Christiano AM, Uitto J. Molecular diagnosis of Moshell A, editors. Epidermolysis bullosa: clinical,
inherited skin diseases: the paradigm of dystrophic epidemiologic, and laboratory advances, and the
epidermolysis bullosa. Adv Dermatol. 1996;11: findings of the national epidermolysis bullosa regis-
199–214. try. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press;
143. Uitto J, Christiano AM. Molecular basis for the dys- 1999. p. 175–92.
trophic forms of epidermolysis bullosa: mutations in 151. Bauer EA, Cooper TW, Tucker DR, Esterly NB.
the type VII collagen gene. Arch Dermatol Res. Phenytoin therapy of recessive dystrophic epidermo-
1994;287:16–22. lysis bullosa. Clinical trial and prposed mechanism
144. Christiano AM, Fine JD, Uitto J. Genetic basis of of action on collagenase. N Engl J Med.
dominantly inherited transient bullous dermolysis of 1980;303:776–81.
the newborn: a splice site mutation in the type VII 152. Fine JD, Johnson L. Efficacy of systemic phenytoin
collagen gene. J Invest Dermatol. 1997;109:811–4. in the treatment of junctional epidermolysis bullosa.
145. Wright JT, Fine JD, Johnson LB. Hereditary epider- Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:1402–6.
molysis bullosa: oral manifestations and dental man- 153. Fritsch P, Klein G, Aubock J, Hintner H. Retinoid
agement. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15:242–8. therapy of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa
146. Wright JT, Fine JD, Johnson L. Dental caries risk in [Letter]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983;9:766–7.
hereditary epidermolysis bullosa. Pediatr Dent. 154. Fine JD, Weiner M, Stein A, et al. Systemic isot-
1994;16:427–32. retinoin and recessive dystrophic epidermolysis
147. Fine JD, Johnson LB, Weiner M, et al. bullosa (RDEB): results of a Phase 1 clinical trial. J
Pseudosyndactyly and musculoskeletal deformities Invest Dermatol. 2001;117:543.
in inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB): experience 155. Fine JD. Skin bioequivalents and their role in the
of the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry, treatment of inherited epidermolysis bullosa
1986-2002. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2005;30:14–22. [Editorial]. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:1259–60.
Vasculitis
9
Larissa Chismar, Sara Wildstein,
and Karthik Krishnamurthy
Vasculitis is defined as inflammation of blood Several classification systems have been used.
vessel walls. There are many types of vasculi- One common system is based on vessel size [1]
tis, lending to its variable clinical presenta- (see Table 9.1). Large vessels encompass the
tion, with or without systemic involvement. aorta, as well as its branching large arteries and
The diagnosis of specific vasculitides can be veins that are directed toward major body regions,
difficult, given much overlap in clinical mani- such as the carotid arteries and their branches.
festations, serum laboratory tests, and tissue Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis mainly
histopathology. In addition, it is essential to involve these vessels. These large arteries are not
differentiate benign, self-limited forms of found in the skin, although skin manifestations
vasculitis from those that may be life- can be seen in these vasculitides [2]. Medium
threatening. vessels are the main visceral (renal, hepatic, cor-
onary, and mesenteric) vessels; these vessels are
implicated in entities such as polyarteritis nodosa
and Kawasaki disease. They may also be involved
in Wegener’s granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syn-
drome, microscopic polyangitis, and cryoglobu-
linemic vasculitis. Small vessels are arterioles,
venules, and capillaries. These vessels are
involved in many types of vasculitis such as cuta-
neous leukocytoclastic vasculitis, Wegener’s
L. Chismar, M.D.
granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, micro-
Division of Dermatology, Montefiore Medical Center,
Bronx, NY, USA scopic polyangitis, Henoch-Schonlein purpura,
e-mail: larissa.chismar@gmail.com and others accounting for the majority of visible
S. Wildstein, B.A. cutaneous disease.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Two classification schemes are those of the
Bronx, NY, USA American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and
K. Krishnamurthy, D.O. (*) the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC).
Dermatology, Jacobi Medical Center, The ACR criteria of 1990 are a set of clinical
Cosmetic Dermatology Clinic, Montefiore
and histological features that classify vasculiti-
Medical Center, Albert Einstien College of Medicine,
Bronx, NY, USA des (see Table 9.2) [3–10]. The CHCC definitions
e-mail: kkderm@gmail.com of 1992 provide histological definitions for ten
Table 9.1 Size-based classification of vasculitis [1] endothelium and also provides a chemotactic
Vessel size Vasculitides signal for the recruitment of inflammatory cells.
Small Cutaneous small vessel The immune complexes themselves are also
vasculitis thought to activate polymorphonuclear leuko-
Henoch-Schonlein purpura cytes (PMNs) and increase production of tumor
Urticarial vasculitis
necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), Fas ligand,
Small and medium Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis
Microscopic polyangitis and perforin. Vessel damage may occur during
Wegener’s granulomatosis diapedesis of PMNs from the luminal side of the
Churg-Strauss syndrome vessel wall [14].
Malignancy-associated
In the anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody
vasculitis
Infection-associated vasculitis (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (Wegener’s
Drug-associated vasculitis granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, and
Connective tissue disorder- microscopic polyangitis), antibodies directed
associated vasculitis
against myeloperoxidase (MPO) or proteinase 3
Medium Polyarteritis nodosa
(PR3) are present. Anti-MPO antibodies increase
Large Takayasu’s arteritis
Giant cell arteritis leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and
migration into renal and pulmonary tissues. These
antibodies also activate MPO; this generates an
oxidative stress which leads to damage of
types of vasculitis (see Table 9.3) [11]. Both of endothelial cells. PR3 bound to the neutrophil
these classification schemes were designed as membrane plays a proinflammatory role, and
research tools. CHCC definitions are based on anti-PR3 antibodies increase the expression of
histology and have limited value for clinical membrane-bound PR3 in neutrophils during cell
diagnosis. The ACR criteria are more amenable adhesion. Anti-PR3 also activates epithelial cells
to clinical diagnosis, but these criteria have a and increases epithelial cell production of
positive predictive value of only 17–29% for the proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6,
diagnosis of specific vasculitides [12]. An expert IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, and
group from the European League Against TNF) [14].
Rheumatism (EULAR) has recently suggested Cell-mediated immune responses may also
that new diagnostic and classification criteria play a role in giant cell arteritis, Takayasu’s
should be developed with more consideration arteritis, Wegener’s granulomatosis, and Churg-
given to current diagnostic testing. While this Strauss syndrome. CD4+ T cells are activated by
group did not propose a new classification sys- antigens in vessel walls or in the circulation.
tem, they proposed 17 points to consider in the These cells produce chemotactic cytokines which
development of such a system. These points recruit monocytes. Monocytes mature into mac-
include biopsy, laboratory testing, radiologic rophages which produce lysosomal enzymes that
testing, nosology, definitions, and research damage endothelial cells [14].
agenda [13].
Vasculitis may be caused by a Type III hyper- Vasculitis is an emergency because of systemic
sensitivity reaction which leads to deposition complications which can be life-threatening.
of immune complexes in blood vessel walls. Renal, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and cardiac
This deposition is an early event in pathogen- complications can be seen with specific vasculiti-
esis and is followed by activation of comple- des. Urgent diagnosis of vasculitis can ensure
ment. Complement may directly damage the prompt initiation of appropriate treatment.
9 Vasculitis 177
Fig. 9.1 Early purpura on the ankle Fig. 9.2 Symmetrically distributed palpable purpura on
the lower extremities due to Henoch-Schonlein purpura
9.2.8 Malignancy-Associated
Vasculitis
infarction. Because of the risk of cardiovascular and exertional dyspnea. Patients develop syncope,
complications, echocardiography and electrocar- congestive heart failure, angina, hypertension,
diography (ECG) are recommended for all Raynaud’s phenomenon, and claudication of the
patients. Coronary arteriography may be pursued upper or lower extremities in the pulseless phase.
in those patients with persistent ECG changes or Physical exam may reveal arterial bruits and ten-
symptoms of cardiac ischemia [55]. Kawasaki derness over the sites of large arteries [61].
disease may have cardiac effects even years after Skin manifestations are seen in 8–28% of
the acute illness. Adults with history of Kawasaki patients. Cutaneous findings include erythema
disease may have increased risk of endothelial nodosum, erythema induratum, and pyoderma
dysfunction and premature atherosclerosis, and gangrenosum. These manifestations are typically
thus long-term follow-up may be warranted in localized to the lower extremities [62].
these patients [56].
Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin
(IVIG) has been associated with improved out- 9.2.15 Giant Cell Arteritis
comes in this condition [55]. Treatment with
aspirin is somewhat controversial. Aspirin has Giant cell arteritis (temporal arteritis) is a form
been used because of its anti-inflammatory and of large vessel vasculitis that involves the aorta
antithrombotic effects. Typical regimens use high and its major branches. It is most common in
doses of 80–100 mg/kg/day during the acute individuals older than 50 years. It occurs most
febrile phase and a maintenance dose of 3–5 mg/ frequently in women and Caucasian individuals
kg/day once the fever subsides [55]. A retrospec- of Northern European descent [63].
tive study by Hsieh et al. found that treatment Giant cell arteritis can present with temporal
without aspirin had no effect on fever duration, headache, claudication of the jaw, and visual
response to IVIG, or incidence of coronary artery changes including visual loss. Nonspecific symp-
aneurysms in patients with acute Kawasaki dis- toms such as fever, malaise, night sweats,
ease who were treated with high-dose IVIG (2 g/ anorexia, and weight loss may also be present. It
kg) [57]. A Cochrane review from 2006 found can result in serious complications such as per-
that there was insufficient evidence to determine manent visual loss, aortic aneurysm, stroke, and
whether or not children should continue to receive limb claudication, and thus early detection is
aspirin in the treatment of Kawasaki disease [58]. essential [64]. Cutaneous findings include scalp
Studies have shown that corticosteroids may be tenderness, blanching of the temporal scalp, cord-
added to IVIG with improved clinical and cardiac like thickening of the temporal artery, and
outcomes [59]. Such improved outcomes are decreased or absent temporal arterial pulse [27].
especially seen in patients who are at high risk to
be IVIG nonresponders [60].
9.3 Clinical Evaluation
Takayasu’s arteritis, also known as pulseless dis- A detailed history is essential in the diagnosis of
ease, is a vasculitis that affects large arteries. It is vasculitis, and a thorough review of systems
typically a disease of young women with peak should be performed. Symptoms suggestive of
incidence between 10 and 24 years of age. It is systemic involvement include fever, malaise,
most common in Asia [61]. weight loss, arthritis, arthralgia, myalgia, hemop-
Clinical manifestations are typically divided tysis, cough, shortness of breath, sinusitis,
into pre-pulseless and pulseless phases. In the pre- abdominal pain, melena, hematochezia, hematu-
pulseless phase patients may experience fever, ria, and paresthesias [17]. One should also
fatigue, weight loss, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, consider possible causes of vasculitis. Patients
9 Vasculitis 187
can exacerbate renal failure. In patients with itch- Cyclophosphamide may be associated with
ing or burning or in those with refractory or serious adverse effects such as infection, bone
recurrent skin disease, dapsone (titrated from 25 marrow toxicity, cystitis, transitional cell carci-
to 50 mg daily), colchicine (0.5–0.6 mg twice noma, myelodysplasia, and infertility [72]. An
daily or three times daily), or pentoxifylline important study by Jayne et al. showed that expo-
(400 mg three times daily) may be tried [71]. sure to cyclophosphamide could be safely reduced
Systemic immunosuppression may be required by substitution of azathioprine after remission was
in patients who develop systemic symptoms, achieved. In this study, comparable rates of relapse
extensive disease, or persistent lesions. Agents were seen in patients who continued on cyclophos-
that may be used include prednisone (15–80 mg phamide after remission (13.7%) and those who
daily or 1–1.5 mg/kg daily), methotrexate were switched to azathioprine (15.5%) [75].
(5–20 mg weekly), azathioprine (50–200 mg Methotrexate has been shown to be an alternative
daily or 0.5–2.5 mg/kg daily based on thiopurine to azathioprine in maintenance therapy. A study
methyltransferase (TPMT) level), hydroxychlo- by Pagnoux et al. showed that the two drugs had
roquine (400 mg three times daily), mycopheno- similar rates of adverse events (azathioprine 29/63
late mofetil (2 g daily), cyclosporine (2.5–5 mg/ patients, methotrexate 35/63) and relapse (azathio-
kg daily, divided twice a day), or cyclophosph- prine 23/63, methotrexate 21/63). Of note, 73% of
amide (2 mg/kg daily) [15, 71]. these relapses occurred after the study drugs were
Therapy for the ANCA-associated vasculitides discontinued [76]. Mycophenolate mofetil appears
has been studied in depth. Before the use of cyclo- to be less effective than azathioprine for mainte-
phosphamide, Wegener’s granulomatosis was a nance of remission. In a study of 156 patients,
fatal disease with death typically occurring within relapse was seen in 30/80 patients treated with
5–12 months of disease onset. The introduction of azathioprine and 42/76 patients treated with myco-
cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids increased phenolate mofetil (p = 0.03) [77].
survival to 80% [72]. A randomized controlled Novel biologic therapies targeted against
trial of 149 patients with ANCA-associated vasc- specific components of the immune system may
ulitis showed that pulse cyclophosphamide be used in patients in whom conventional therapy
(15 mg/kg every 2–3 weeks) was as effective as has failed. Agents such as infliximab (chimeric
daily oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg) in induc- antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)
ing remission; in addition, fewer cases of leuko- monoclonal antibody), etanercept (fusion protein
penia were seen with the pulse regimen [73]. of the p75 TNF-alpha receptor and IgG1), adali-
In some patients, methotrexate may be an alter- mumab (fully humanized IgG1 anti-TNF-alpha
native to cyclophosphamide for induction of monoclonal antibody), rituximab (chimeric anti-
remission. A randomized trial of 100 patients CD20 monoclonal antibody), anakinra (recombi-
found similar remission rates at 6 months of ther- nant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist), and IVIG
apy (methotrexate 89.8% and cyclophosphamide may be used in refractory disease [78, 79].
93.5%). However, remission was delayed in Prospective studies of infliximab and adalimumab
patients with lower respiratory tract involvement combined with standard therapy of cyclophosph-
or more extensive disease. Patients treated with amide and corticosteroids in patients with ANCA-
methotrexate had a higher rate of relapse (69.5%) associated vasculitis have shown that these agents
than patients treated with cyclophosphamide may reduce corticosteroid requirements. Mean
(46.5%), and relapse occurred sooner in those prednisolone doses decreased from 23.8 mg/day to
treated with methotrexate (13 months) than in 8.8 mg/day at week 14 with infliximab [80]. In
those treated with cyclophosphamide (15 months). patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and
In this study both treatments were tapered and renal involvement, adalimumab reduced mean
stopped by 12 months; the high rates of relapse prednisolone doses from 37.1 to 8.1 mg/day at
lead the authors to conclude that therapy should week 14 [81]. A randomized controlled trial of
be continued longer than 12 months [74]. 174 patients found that etanercept was not more
190 L. Chismar et al.
effective than placebo in maintenance treatment of 2. Carlson JA, Chen KR. Cutaneous vasculitis update:
Wegener’s granulomatosis. Sustained remission neutrophilic muscular vessel and eosinophilic, granu-
lomatous, and lymphocytic vasculitis syndromes. Am
was seen in 69.7% of patients treated with etaner- J Dermatopathol. 2007;29:32–43.
cept and in 75.3% of patients in the control group 3. Hunder GG, Arend WP, Bloch DA, et al. The
(p = 0.39) [82]. A recent study by the European American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for
Vasculitis Study Group found that rituximab and the classification of vasculitis. Introduction. Arthritis
Rheum. 1990;33:1065–7.
cyclophosphamide-based induction regimens for 4. Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, et al. The
ANCA-associated renal vasculitides had similar American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for
rates of sustained remissions and adverse effects. the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis
Sustained remission was seen in 76% of patients in Rheum. 1990;33:1122–8.
5. Arend WP, Michel BA, Bloch DA, et al. The American
the rituximab group (treated with glucocorticoids, College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the
rituximab for 4 weeks, and 2 cyclophosphamide classification of Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheum.
pulses) and in 82% of patients in the control group 1990;33:1129–34.
(treated with glucocorticoids and cyclophosph- 6. Lightfoot RW, Michel BA, Bloch DA, et al. The
American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for
amide for 3–6 months followed by azathioprine). the classification of polyarteritis nodosa. Arthritis
Severe adverse effects occurred in 42% of patients Rheum. 1990;33:1088–93.
in the rituximab group and 36% of patients in the 7. Leavitt RY, Fauci AS, Bloch DA, et al. The American
control group; 18% of patients in each group died College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the
classification of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Arthritis
[83]. The RAVE-ITN Research Group found that Rheum. 1990;33:1101–7.
rituximab may be superior to cyclophosphamide 8. Masi AT, Hunder GG, Lie JT, et al. The American
for inducing remission in relapsing disease. College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the
Disease remission at 6 months (without corticos- classification of Churg-Strauss syndrome (allergic
granulomatosis and angiitis). Arthritis Rheum.
teroids) was seen in 67% of the rituximab group 1990;33:1094–100.
versus 42% of the control group treated with 9. Mills JA, Michel BA, Bloch DA, et al. The American
cyclophosphamide (p = 0.01) [84]. College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the
classification of Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Arthritis
Rheum. 1990;33:1114–21.
10. Calabrese LH, Michel BA, Bloch DA, et al. The
9.5 Conclusion American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for
the classification of hypersensitivity vasculitis.
The vasculitides are a heterogeneous group of dis- Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:1108–13.
11. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Andrassy K, et al. Nomenclature
eases. While some forms of vasculitis are limited of systemic vasculitides. Proposal of an international
to the skin, the physician must always consider consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum.
the possibility of systemic involvement. A thor- 1994;37:187–92.
ough history, physical examination, and biopsy 12. Rao JK, Allen NB, Pincus T. Limitations of the 1990
American College of Rheumatology classification cri-
increase the likelihood of making a correct diag- teria in the diagnosis of vasculitis. Ann Intern Med.
nosis. While some forms of vasculitis progress 1998;129:345–52.
slowly, others can lead to fatal complications rap- 13. Basu N, Watts R, Bajema I, et al. EULAR points to
idly; the prompt recognition of vasculitis and consider in the development of classification and
diagnostic criteria in systemic vasculitis. Ann Rheum
determination of extent of disease are crucial so Dis. 2010;69:1744–50.
that appropriate therapy can be initiated. 14. Danila MI, Bridges SL. Update on pathogenic mecha-
nisms of systemic necrotizing vasculitis. Curr
Rheumatol Rep. 2008;10:430–5.
15. Lotti T, Ghersetich I, Comacchi C, Jorizzo JL.
Cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis. J Am Acad
References Dermatol. 1998;39:667–90.
16. Carlson JA, Chen KR. Cutaneous vasculitis update:
1. Chung L, Kea B, Fiorentino DF. Cutaneous vasculitis. small vessel neutrophilic vasculitis syndromes. Am J
In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, editors. Dermatopathol. 2006;28:486–506.
Dermatology. 2nd ed. Spain: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. 17. Fiorentino DF. Cutaneous vasculitis. J Am Acad
p. 347–67. Dermatol. 2003;48:311–40.
9 Vasculitis 191
18. Weiss PF, Klink AJ, Luan X, Feudtner C. Temporal 36. Beauvillain C, Delneste Y, Renier G, Jeannin P, Subra
association of Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, and JF, Chevailler A. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibod-
parainfluenza pediatric hospitalizations and hospital- ies: how should the biologist manage them? Clin Rev
ized cases of Henoch-Schonlein purpura. J Rheumatol. Allergy Immunol. 2008;35:47–58.
2010;37:2587–94. 37. Gonzalez-Gay MA, Garcia-Porrua C. Systemic vasc-
19. Saulsbury FT. Henoch-Schonlein purpura in children. ulitides. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol.
Report of 100 patients and review of the literature. 2002;16:833–45.
Medicine. 1999;78:395–409. 38. Burrows NP, Lockwood CM. Antineutrophil cyto-
20. Watts RA, Lane S, Scott DG. What is known about plasmic antibodies and their relevance to the derma-
the epidemiology of the vasculitides? Best Pract Res tologist. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132:173–81.
Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:191–207. 39. Abdou NI, Kullman GJ, Hoffman GS, et al. Wegener’s
21. Blanco R, Martinez-Taboada VM, Rodriguez- granulomatosis: survey of 701 patients in North
Valverde V, Garcia-Fuentes M, Gonzalez-Gay MA. America. Changes in outcome in the 1990s. J
Henoch–Schonlein purpura in adulthood and child- Rheumatol. 2002;29:309–16.
hood. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:859–64. 40. Hoffman GS, Kerr GS, Leavitt RY, et al. Wegener’s
22. Narchi H. Risk of long term renal impairment and granulomatosis: an analysis of 158 patients. Ann
duration of follow-up recommended for Henoch- Intern Med. 1992;116:488–98.
Schonlein purpura with normal or minimal urinary 41. Ramakrishna G, Midthun DE. Churg-Strauss syn-
findings: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. drome. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol.
2005;90:916–20. 2001;86:603–13.
23. Coppo R, Mazzucco G, Cagnoli L, Lupo A, Schena 42. Vanoli M, Gambini D, Scorza R. A case of Churg-
FP. Long-term prognosis of Henoch-Schonlein nephri- Strauss vasculitis after Hepatitis B vaccination. Ann
tis in adults and children. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Rheum Dis. 1998;57:256–7.
1997;12:2277–83. 43. Jamaleddine G, Diab K, Tabbarah Z, Tawil A, Arayssi
24. Ronkainen J, Koskimies O, Ala-Houhala M, et al. T. Leukotriene antagonists and the Churg-Strauss syn-
Early prednisone therapy in Henoch-Schonlein pur- drome. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002;31:218–27.
pura: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled 44. Lhote F, Cohen P, Guillevin L. Polyarteritis nodosa,
trial. J Pediatr. 2006;149:241–7. microscopic polyangiitis and Churg-Strauss syn-
25. Jauhola O, Ronkainen J, Koskimies O, et al. Outcome drome. Lupus. 1998;7:238–58.
of Henoch-Schonlein purpura 8 years after treatment 45. Mertz LE, Conn DL. Vasculitis associated with malig-
with a placebo or prednisone at disease onset. Pediatr nancy. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1992;4:39–46.
Nephrol. 2012;27(6):933–9 [Epub ahead of print]. 46. ten Holder SM, Joy MS, Falk RJ. Cutaneous and sys-
26. Poonawalla T, Kelly B. Urticaria: a review. Am J Clin temic manifestations of drug-induced vasculitis. Ann
Dermatol. 2009;10:9–21. Pharmacother. 2002;36:130–47.
27. Chen KR, Carlson JA. Clinical approach to cutaneous 47. Gross RL, Brucker J, Bahce-Altuntas A, et al. A novel
vasculitis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9:71–92. cutaneous vasculitis syndrome induced by levamisole-
28. Stone JH, Nousari HC. “Essential” cutaneous vasculitis: contaminated cocaine. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30:1385
what every rheumatologist should know about vasculitis [Epub ahead of print].
of the skin. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13:23–34. 48. Menni S, Gianotti R, Ghio L, Edefonti A. Ear lobe
29. Black AK. Urticarial vasculitis. Clin Dermatol. bilateral necrosis by levamisole-induced occlusive
1999;17:565–9. vasculitis in a pediatric patient. Pediatr Dermatol.
30. Jara L, Navarro C, Medina G, Vera-Lastra O, Saavedra 1997;14:477–9.
SA. Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syn- 49. Rongioletti F, Ghio L, Ginervi F, et al. Purpura of the
drome. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2009;11:410–5. ears: a distinctive vasculopathy with circulating autoan-
31. Aydogan K, Karadogan SK, Adim SB, Tunali S. tibodies complicating long-term treatment with levami-
Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome: sole in children. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140:948–51.
a rare presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus. 50. Powell J, Grech H, Holder J. A boy with cutaneous
Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:1057–61. necrosis occurring during treatment with levamisole.
32. Almerigogna F, Giudizi MG, Cappelli F, Romagnani Clin Exp Dermatol. 2002;27:32–3.
F. Schnitzler’s syndrome: what’s new? J Eur Acad 51. Doyle MK. Vasculitis associated with connective tis-
Dermatol Venereol. 2002;16:214–9. sue disorders. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2006;8:312–6.
33. Ferri C, Zignego AL, Giuggioli D, et al. HCV and 52. Morgan AJ, Schwartz RA. Cutaneous polyarteritis
cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. Cleve Clin J Med. nodosa: a comprehensive review. Int J Dermatol.
2002;69:SII20–3. 2010;49:750–6.
34. Trejo O, Ramos-Casals M, Garcia-Carrasco M, et al. 53. Pettigrew HD, Teuber SS, Gershwin ME. Polyarteritis
Cryoglobulinemia: study of etiologic factors and clin- nodosa. Compr Ther. 2007;33:144–9.
ical and immunologic features in 443 patients from a 54. Gedalia A. Kawasaki disease: an update. Curr
single center. Medicine. 2001;80:252–62. Rheumatol Rep. 2002;4:25–9.
35. Motyckova G, Murali M. Laboratory testing for cryo- 55. Nasr I, Tometzki AJP, Schofield OMV. Kawasaki dis-
globulins. Am J Hematol. 2011;86:500–2. ease: an update. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:6–12.
192 L. Chismar et al.
56. Noto N, Okada T, Karasawa K, et al. Age-related 71. Carlson JA, Cavaliere LF, Grant-Kels JM. Cutaneous
acceleration of endothelial dysfunction and subclini- vasculitis: diagnosis and management. Clin Dermatol.
cal atherosclerosis in subjects with coronary artery 2006;24:414–29.
lesions after Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 72. Langford CA. Cyclophosphamide as induction ther-
2009;30:262–8. apy for Wegener’s granulomatosis and microscopic
57. Hsieh KS, Weng KP, Lin CC, Huang TC, Lee CL, polyangitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;164 Suppl
Huang SM. Treatment of acute Kawasaki disease: 1:31–4.
aspirin’s role in the febrile stage revisited. Pediatrics. 73. de Groot K, Harper L, Jayne DRW, et al. Pulse versus
2004;114:e689–93. daily oral cyclophosphamide for induction of remis-
58. Baumer JH, Love SJ, Gupta A, Haines LC, Maconochie sion in antineutrophil antibody-associated vasculitis:
I, Dua JS. Salicylate for the treatment of Kawasaki a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med.
disease in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;150:670–80.
2006;4:CD004175. 74. De Groot K, Rasmussen N, Bacon PA, et al.
59. Inoue Y, Okada Y, Shinohara M, et al. A multicenter Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide versus metho-
prospective randomized trial of corticosteroids in pri- trexate for induction of remission in early systemic
mary therapy for Kawasaki disease: clinical course antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasc-
and coronary artery outcome. J Pediatr. ulitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2461–9.
2006;149:336–41. 75. Jayne D, Rasmussen N, Andrassy K, et al. A random-
60. Kobayashi T, Inoue Y, Otani T, et al. Risk stratification ized trial of maintenance therapy for vasculitis associ-
in the decision to include prednisolone with intrave- ated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. N
nous immunoglobulin in primary therapy of Kawasaki Engl J Med. 2003;349:36–44.
disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:498–502. 76. Pagnoux C, Mahr A, Hamidou MA, et al. Azathioprine
61. Fraga A, Medina F. Takayasu’s arteritis. Curr or methotrexate maintenance for ANCA-associated
Rheumatol Rep. 2002;4:30–8. vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2790–803.
62. Pascual-Lopez M, Hernandez-Nunez A, Aragues- 77. Hiemstra TF, Walsh M, Mahr A, et al. Mycophenolate
Montanes M, Dauden E, Farga J, Garcia-Diez A. mofetil vs azathioprine for remission maintenance in
Takayasu’s disease with cutaneous involvement. antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasc-
Dermatology. 2004;208:10–5. ulitis. JAMA. 2010;304:2381–8.
63. Villa-Forte A. Giant cell arteritis: Suspect it, treat it 78. Langford CA. Drug insight: anti-tumor necrosis fac-
promptly. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78:265–70. tor therapies for the vasculitic diseases. Nat Clin Pract
64. Direskeneli H, Aydin SZ, Herlyn K, et al. Development Rheumatol. 2008;4:364–70.
of outcome measures for large-vessel vasculitis for 79. Eleftheriou D, Melo M, Marks SD, et al. Biologic
use in clinical trials: opportunities, challenges, and therapy in primary systemic vasculitis of the young.
research agenda. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1471–9. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:978–86.
65. De Araujo TS, Kirsner RS. Vasculitis. Wounds. 80. Booth A, Harper L, Hammad T, et al. Prospective
2001;13:99–112. study of TNF-alpha blockade with infliximab in anti-
66. Wysong A, Venkatesan P. An approach to the patient neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated systemic
with retiform purpura. Dermatol Ther. vasculitis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:717–21.
2011;24:151–72. 81. Laurino S, Chaudhry A, Booth A, Conte G, Jayne D.
67. Piette W. Purpura: mechanisms and differential diag- Prospective study of TNF-alpha blockade with adali-
nosis. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, editors. mumab in ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis with
Dermatology. 2nd ed. Spain: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. renal involvement. Nephrol Dial Transplant.
p. 321–30. 2010;25:3307–14.
68. Sais G, Vidaller A, Jucgla A, Servetje O, Condom E, 82. The Wegener’s Granulomatosis Etanercept Trial
Peyri J. Prognostic factors in leukocytoclastic vasculi- Research Group. Etanercept plus standard therapy for
tis: a clinicopathologic study of 160 patients. Arch Wegener’s granulomatosis. N Engl J Med.
Dermatol. 1998;134:309–15. 2005;352:351–61.
69. Carlson JA. The histologic assessment of cutaneous 83. Jones RB, Tervaert JWC, Hauser T, et al. Rituximab
vasculitis. Histopathology. 2010;56:3–23. versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal
70. Martinez-Taboada VM, Blanco R, Garcia-Fuentes M, vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:211–20.
Rodriguez-Valverde V. Clinical features and outcome 84. Stone JH, Merkel PA, Spiera R, et al. Rituximab ver-
of 95 patients with hypersensitivity vasculitis. Am J sus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculi-
Med. 1997;102:186–91. tis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:221–32.
Skin Manifestations of Internal
Disease 10
Daniel Behroozan and Hana Jeon
produced the change, such as an increase in the characteristic lesions help to make the diagnosis.
number of capillaries and a thickening of the cap- To verify the composition of the lesions, scrap-
illary walls in the nail bed [11]. ings can be taken and diluted in normal saline,
and then tested for elevated urea nitrogen levels.
large before healing with a thin and atrophic scar disease, treatment of which may help to treat the
[40]. While not specific to pyoderma gangreno- skin lesions; the nodules may regress as the level
sum, patients may exhibit pathergy, a phenome- of lipolytic pancreatic enzymes decreases.
non where skin trauma or injury can trigger the
development of skin ulcerations which may be
resistant to healing. Pathergy may also lead to 10.9.3 Dermatitis Herpetiformis
non-healing wounds at sites of surgical incisions.
Facial pydoerma gangrenosum tends to be more Dermatitis herpetiformis, a cutaneous marker of
superficial and less destructive. gluten-sensitive enteropathy, is characterized by
The pathogenesis of pyoderma gangrenosum pruritic grouped papules and vesicles symmetri-
remains largely unknown. It is thought that abnor- cally distributed on the elbows, knees, scalp, but-
mal neutrophil trafficking and immunologic dys- tocks, and extensor forearms [42]. Men are more
function are involved. Pyoderma gangrenosum is often affected than women, and dermatitis herpe-
a diagnosis of exclusion; culture for bacterial, tiformis usually first occurs at a young adult age.
viral, and fungal agents should be done. Therapy Gluten is the main adhesive substance of many
involves treating the associated disease and grains, and gliadin is the most important sensitiz-
administration of systemic steroids (predinoso- ing protein as well as the substrate for tissue glu-
lone 1–2 mg/kg daily with tapering as healing taminase. Autoantibodies against tissue
occurs) and other immunosuppressive agents glutaminase also cross-react with epidermal trans-
such as cyclosporine. However, treatment is often glutaminase leading to the formation of the cuta-
recalcitrant when an underlying systemic condi- neous lesions. There is a strong HLA association
tion cannot be identified and subsequently treated. with 90% of patients possessing HLA-DQ2.
More recently, the use of TNF-a inhibitors, The diagnosis can be made by histologic
specifically infliximab (5 mg/kg infusion at weeks examination of an early blister and direct
0, 2, and 6 and every 8 weeks after that), has also immunofluorescence of non-lesional skin in
been shown to be effective in management of this which IgA is seen in the dermal papillae.
difficult condition. Suppressive therapy using dapsone is the main-
stay of treatment. Dapsone is effective in rapidly
clearing the rash, but relapse upon discontinua-
10.9.2 Pancreatic Panniculitis tion of the medication is also rapid. Therapy
should also include a gluten-free diet, which can
Pancreatic panniculitis has been associated with be difficult, but essential in treating the underly-
both acute and chronic pancreatitis as well as ing disease as well as dermatitis herpetiformis.
pancreatic carcinoma, but overall is a rare associ-
ated finding in patients with pancreatitis.
Pancreatitis results in the outpouring of digestive 10.9.4 Hepatobiliary/Cirrhosis
enzymes, such as pancreatic lipase, phospholi-
pase, trypsin, and amylase, that may migrate into 10.9.4.1 Spider Angiomas
tissue to cause pancreatic panniculitis [41]. The cutaneous signs of liver disease generally
Tender, fluctuant, red subcutaneous nodules correlate with the severity of the disease [43].
develop on the lower legs. Occasionally, the nod- Cirrhosis distorts the normal liver anatomy
ules rupture discharging a thick and oily liquid causing decreased blood flow through the liver
which may be a result of autodigestion of the resulting in portal hypertension. Portal hyperten-
subcutaneous fat by the pancreatic enzymes. sion, in turn, results in ascites, peripheral edema,
Histologically, a mixed lobular and septal pan- and varices. There is also impaired biochemical
niculitis with lipocyte necrosis (“ghost cells”) function; albumin as well as clotting factor syn-
and basophilic saponification may be seen. thesis are decreased. This results in purpura and
Prognosis depends on the underlying pancreatic ecchymoses.
202 D. Behroozan and H. Jeon
12. Kint A, Bussels L, Fernandes M, Ringoir S. Skin and 34. Baughman RP, Lower EE. Newer therapies for cuta-
nail disorders in relation to chronic renal failure. Acta neous sarcoidosis: the role of thalidomide and other
Derm Venerol. 1974;54:137–40. agents. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004;5:385–94.
13. Goicoechea M, de Sequera P, Ochando A, et al. 35. Feldman SR. Adrenal, androgen-related, and pituitary
Uremic pruritus: an unresolved problem in hemodial- disorders. In: Callen JP et al., editors. Dermatological
ysis patients. Nephron. 1999;82:73–4. signs of internal disease. Philadelphia, PA: W.B.
14. Urbonas A, Schwartz RA, Szepietowski JC. Uremic Saunders; 1995. p. 203–11.
pruritus: an update. Am J Nephrol. 2001;21:343–50. 36. Freinkel RK. Other endocrine diseases. In:
15. Walsh SR, Parada NA. Uremic frost. N Eng J Med. Freedberg IM et al., editors. Fitzpatrick’s dermatol-
2005;352:e13. ogy in general medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill;
16. Kuo CC, Hung JB, Tsai CW, Chen YM. Uremic frost. 1999. p. 1980–1.
CMAJ. 2010;182(17):E800. Epub 2010. 37. Ohnishi T, et al. Erythrodermic psoriasis associated
17. Lowitt MH, Dover JS. Necrobiosis lipoidica. J Am with hyperuricemia and iatrogenic Cushing’s syn-
Acad Dermatol. 1991;25:735. drome due to topical corticosteroid therapy. Int J
18. Muller SAK, Winkelman RK. Necrobiosis lipoidica Dermatol. 1996;35(5):379–80.
diabeticorum: a clinical and pathological investigation 38. Tosti A, Iorizzo M, Piraccini BM, Starace M. The nail
of 171 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1966;93(3):272–81. in systemic diseases. Dermatol Clin. 2006;24:341–7.
19. Suzuki K, Ito Y, Nakamura S, Ochiai J, Aoki K. 39. Martinez-Lavin M, Vargas A, Rivera-Viñas M.
Relationship between serum carotenoids and hyperg- Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy: a palindrome with a
lycemia: a population-based crosssectional study. J pathogenic connotation. Curr Opin Rheumatol.
Epidemiol. 2002;12:357–66. 2008;20:88–91.
20. Huntley AC. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes 40. Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Iorizzo M. Systemic itracon-
mellitus. Dermatol Clin. 1989;7:531–46. azole in the yellow nail syndrome. Br J Dermatol.
21. Wahid Z, Kanjee A. Cutaneous manifestations of dia- 2002;146(6):1064–7.
betes mellitus. J Pak Med Assoc. 1998;48:304–5. 41. Jorizzo JL, Greer KE, Callen JP. Miscellaneous disor-
22. Lipsky BA, Baker PD, Ahroni JH. Diabetic bullae: 12 ders with prominent features involving the skin and
cases of a purportedly rare cutaneous disorder. Int J the joints. In: Callen JP, Jorizzo JL, Bolognia JL, et al.,
Dermatol. 2000;39:196–200. editors. Dermatologic signs of internal disease. 3rd ed.
23. Aye M, Masson EA. Dermatological care of the dia- Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2003. p. 39–41.
betic foot. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3:463–74. 42. Beltraminelli HS, Buechner SA, Haeusermann P.
24. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP. Other vesicu- Pancreatic panniculitis in a patient with an acinar cell
lobullous diseases. In: Dermatology, 1st ed. cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Dermatology.
Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, 2003. pp 501–8. 2004;208:265–7.
25. Lopez PR, Leicht S, Sigmon JR, Stigall L. Bullosis 43. Nikolas ME, Krause PK, Gibson LE, et al. Dermatits
diabeticorum associated with a prediabetic state. herpetiformis. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42:588–600.
South Med J. 2009;102(6):643–4. 44. Braverman IM. Disease of the gastrointestinal tract.
26. Hermanns-Le T, Scheen A, Pierard GE. Acanthosis Skin signs of systemic disease, 3rd ed. Philadelphia,
nigricans associated with insulin resistance: PA: W.B. Saunders, 1998. pp. 405–37.
pathophysiology and management. Am J Clin 45. Holzberg M, Walker HK. Terry’s nails: revised
Dermatol. 2004;5:199–203. definition and new correlations. Lancet. 1984;1:896–9.
27. Ai J, Leonhardt JM, Heymann WR. Autoimmune thy- 46. Piette WW. Dysproteinemias, plasma cell disorders,
roid diseases: etiology, pathogenesis, and dermatologic and amyloidosis. In: Callen JP et al., editors.
manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:641–59. Dermatological signs of internal disease. Philadelphia,
28. Daumerie C, Ludgate M, Costagliola S, Many MC. PA: W.B. Saunders; 1995. p. 137–49.
Evidence of thyrotropin receptor immunoreactivity in 47. Silverstein SR. Primary, systemic amyloidosis and the
pretibial connective tissue from patients with thyroid-asso- dermatologist: where classic skin lesions may provide
ciated dermopathy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146:35–8. the clue for early diagnosis. Dermatol Online J.
29. Rosen T, Kleman GA. Thyroid and the skin. In: Callen JP 2005;11:5.
et al., editors. Dermatological signs of internal disease. 48. Jambrosic J, from L, Hanna W. Lichen amyloidosis:
Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1995. p. 189–95. Ultrastructure and pathogenesis. Am J Dermatopathol.
30. Yanardag H, Pamuk ON, Karayel T. Cutaneous 1984;6:151–8.
involvement in sarcoidosis: analysis of the features in 49. Albano EA, Kanter J. Images in clinical medicine.
170 patients. Respir Med. 2003;97:978–82. Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule. N Engl J Med.
31. Callen JP. Sarcoidosis. In: Callen JP et al., editors. 2005;352(18):1913.
Dermatological signs of internal disease. Philadelphia, 50. Carroll MC, Fleming M, Chitambar CR, Neuburg M.
PA: W.B. Saunders; 1995. p. 293–300. Diagnosis, workup, and prognosis of cutaneous
32. Leonard AL. Sarcoidosis. Dermatol Online J. metastases of unknown primary origin. Dermatol
2003;9:40. Surg. 2002;28:533–5.
33. Kunz M, Beutel S, Brocker E. Leukocyte activation in 51. Mekhail TM, Markman M. Acanthosis nigricans with
erythema nodosum. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1999;24: endometrial carcinoma: case report and review of the
396–401. literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;84:332–4.
Cutaneous Findings of Collagen
Vascular Disease and Related 11
Emergent Complications
Collagen vascular diseases are disorders of Lupus erythematosus is a broad term used to
unknown etiology, with features of autoimmu- describe a spectrum of clinical entities ranging
nity, in which the immune system loses the capac- from localized cutaneous manifestations to poten-
ity to distinguish self from nonself. This loss of tially life-threatening, multi-organ systemic
immune tolerance can result in varied and pro- involvement, caused by pathogenic autoantibod-
tean clinical manifestations, ranging from mild ies, leading to immune complex formation in tar-
constitutional symptoms to major organ failure. get tissues.
Skin changes may be the initial manifestation of, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is diag-
or have pathognomonic features, for specific col- nosed clinically, as proposed by the American
lagen vascular diseases, and are often invaluable College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. Patients
to diagnosis. In this chapter we focus on identify- must fulfill 4 of the 11 criteria [1, 2] (Table 11.1).
ing features of collagen vascular diseases, with Constitutional symptoms including fatigue,
an emphasis on cutaneous findings and emergent weight loss, and fever are common during active
complications. lupus. Fatigue may persist even when lupus is
“quiescent” [3, 4].
Arthritis, presenting as joint swelling and
pain, and arthralgias, or joint pain without syno-
vitis, are one of the most common, and early fea-
tures of SLE, and are often present at sometime
during the disease course (Table 11.2), specifically
with a lupus flare [5].
Hematologic manifestations are also common,
A. Krishnamurthy, D.O. (*)
including leukopenia (46%), anemia (42%), and
Preferred Health Partners, 233 Nostrand Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11205, USA thrombocytopenia (7–30%) [6, 7]. When leukope-
e-mail: aneesakrish@gmail.com; nia is secondary to active lupus, the WBC rarely
krishnamurthya@brooklyndocs.com decreases to <1,500 and the bone marrow is usu-
D.H. Lee, M.D., Ph.D. • A. Chan, M.D. ally normal, with a greater drop in neutrophil count
Department of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College than lymphocyte count, though isolated lympho-
of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center,
cytopenia is a more frequent finding. Anemia is
111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467-2490, USA
e-mail: diana.h.lee@gmail.com; frequent and often multifactorial, usually second-
Aegean.Chan@med.einstein.yu.edu ary to chronic disease or iron deficiency [8, 9].
Table 11.1 1997 American College of rheumatology revised criteria for classification of systemic lupus
erythematosus
Criterion Definition
Malar rash Fixed erythema, flat or raised, over the malar eminences, tending to spare the
nasolabial folds
Discoid rash Erythematous raised patches with adherent keratotic scaling and follicular
plugging; atrophic scarring may occur in older lesions
Photosensitivity Skin rash as a result of unusual reaction to sunlight, by patient history or physician
observation
Oral ulcers Oral or nasopharyngeal ulceration, usually painless, observed by physician
Arthritis Non-erosive arthritis involving two or more peripheral joints, characterized by
tenderness, swelling, or effusion
Serositis (a) Pleuritis—convincing history of pleuritic pain, rubbing heard by a physician,
or evidence of pleural effusion
OR
(b) Pericarditis—documented by ECG, rub or evidence of pericardial effusion
Renal disorder (a) Persistent proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/day or greater than 3+ if quantitation
not performed
OR
(b) Cellular casts—may be red cell, hemoglobin, granular, tubular, or mixed
Neurologic disorder (a) Seizures—in the absence of offending drugs or known metabolic derange-
ments, e.g., uremia, ketoacidosis, or electrolyte imbalance
OR
(b) Psychosis—in the absence of offending drugs or known metabolic derange-
ments, e.g., uremia, ketoacidosis, or electrolyte imbalance
Hematologic disorder (a) Hemolytic anemia with reticulocytosis
OR
(b) Leukopenia—less than 4,000/mm3 total WBC on two or more occasions
OR
(c) Lymphopenia—less than 1,500/mm3 on two or more occasions
OR
(d) Thrombocytopenia—less than 100,000/mm3 in the absence of offending drugs
Immunologic disorder (a) Anti-DNA antibody to native DNA in abnormal titer
OR
(b) Anti-Sm: presence of antibody to Sm nuclear antigen
OR
(c) Positive finding of antiphospholipid antibodies based on (1) an abnormal
serum level of IgG or IgM anticardiolipin antibodies; (2) a positive test result
for lupus anticoagulant using a standard methods; or (3) a false-positive
serologic test for syphilis known to be positive for at least 6 months and
confirmed by Treponema pallidum immobilization or fluorescent treponemal
antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS)
Antinuclear antibody (ANA) An abnormal titer of antinuclear antibody by immunofluorescence (or an
equivalent assay) at any point in time and in the absence of drugs known to be
associated with “drug-induced lupus” syndrome
Table 11.2 Cumulative prevalence of 16 clinical and lab 11.2.1.1 Cutaneous Lupus
manifestations in 2,000 lupus patients [6]
Cutaneous lupus is seen in 59–85% of SLE
Clinical or lab manifestation Percentage patients [25] and can be classified as LE-specific
Positive ANA 97% skin disease and LE-nonspecific skin disease.
Arthritis, arthralgia, or myalgia 80% LE-specific skin disease has characteristic histo-
Skin changes 71% pathologic changes, including epidermal atrophy,
Low complement 51% hyperkeratosis, liquefactive degeneration of the
Cognitive dysfunction 50%
basal epidermis, and mononuclear cell infiltrate
Fever 48%
[26]. The three main categories of LE-specific
Elevated anti-dsDNA 46%
cutaneous disease are acute cutaneous (ACLE),
Leukopenia 46%
subacute cutaneous (SCLE), and chronic cutane-
Pleuritis 44%
Proteinuria 42%
ous (CCLE).
Anemia 35% LE-nonspecific lesions, such as vasculitis and
Antiphospholipid antibody 35% alopecia, do not have the characteristic LE histo-
Elevated gamma globulin 32% pathological changes, and can found in other
Pleural or pericardial effusion 12% medical conditions besides lupus.
CNS vasculitis 12% It is important to note that not all cutaneous
Adenopathy 10% lupus patients have systemic lupus. Of patients
with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) lesions,
only 5–10% will go on to develop SLE.
in 19–48% of patients [12]. Tamponade and Conversely, 25% of patients with systemic lupus
myocardial disease is rare [13]. Clinicians should develop DLE lesions at some point in their dis-
consider pulmonary embolism as the cause of ease course. Of patients with SCLE, about
cardiopulmonary symptoms in patients with 10–15% develop SLE. Presence of acute cutane-
lupus anticoagulant or anticardiolipin antibodies ous lupus lesions usually indicates underlying
[14]. Pulmonary hemorrhage is a rare, yet life- SLE [27, 28].
threatening emergency in SLE, presenting with
marked hypoxia along with abnormal chest
imaging [15]. This complication is usually the 11.2.2 LE-Specific Skin Disease
result of either pneumonitis or pulmonary
embolus and is associated with high mortality in 11.2.2.1 Acute Cutaneous Lupus
the range of 50–90% [16]. Lupus patients are at Erythematosus
higher risk for coronary artery disease, and myo- Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE)
cardial infarction is now the most common cause can present in localized or generalized distribu-
of death in SLE patients in the Western world tions and often occurs in the setting of acutely
[17, 18]. flaring SLE [29]. The most common form of
Kidney involvement is a major cause of mor- ACLE is localized symmetric, confluent ery-
bidity and hospital admissions. The most com- thema and edema over the malar region and the
mon manifestation of lupus nephritis is proteinuria bridge of the nose, sparing the nasolabial folds,
[19, 20]. Nephritic or nephrotic syndrome can be also known as the “butterfly” rash (Fig. 11.1).
observed in 30% of patients. Rapidly progressive The malar butterfly rash is present at time of SLE
glomerulonephritis occurs in less than 5% of diagnosis in 20–60% of patients [25, 30]. The
patients with SLE [21]. eruption fluctuates with disease activity and can
Neuropsychiatric manifestations are seen in be differentiated from acne rosacea or seborrheic
up to 60% of patients. Symptoms include sei- dermatitis by its lack of papules and pustules and
zures, personality changes, and cerebrovascular by its distribution. Painless oral and/or nasal
accidents, and are a major cause of morbidity mucosal ulcerations (Fig. 11.2) frequently accom-
[22–24]. pany lesions of ACLE [31].
210 A. Krishnamurthy et al.
Fig. 11.3 Generalized rash of ACLE, which is typically Fig. 11.5 Discoid lesions of chronic cutaneous lupus
photosensitive, occurring mainly over sun-exposed areas erythematosus
matosus, which manifests as pemphigus folia- sive metabolic panel, urinalysis, complement lev-
ceous-like lesions in a seborrheic distribution in els, and autoantibody profile.
the setting of LE, and Rowell syndrome, in which
erythema multiforme-like lesions are seen in
patients with LE [31, 47]. 11.2.5 Treatment
Fig. 11.11 Livido reticularis Fig. 11.12 Lower extremity ulceration secondary to
thrombosis in acute antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
in 1% of the population [11]. Patients with con- morbidity can manifest as unexplained consecu-
comitant autoimmune disease such as lupus are tive spontaneous abortions before the 10th week
labeled as “secondary APS.” Of lupus patients of gestation, death of a normal fetus beyond the
with antiphospholipid antibodies, 10–15% have 10th week of gestation, or premature birth of a
clinical manifestations of APS [67, 68]. normal neonate prior to 34th week of gestation
Up to 50% of APS patients have nonbacterial due to eclampsia, severe preeclampsia, or pla-
cardiac valvular thickening or vegetations, known cental insufficiency. Those occurring after 10
as marantic or Libman-Sacks endocarditis. weeks of gestation are most associated with aPL.
Though severe cardiac manifestations requiring Patients with a history of previous fetal loss and
valvular replacement are rare, dermatologic man- high titer IgG aCL are at 80% risk for loss of
ifestations are common. Livedo reticularis is seen their current pregnancy. Other obstetric manifes-
in 22–35% of SLE patients [42], particularly tations of APS include premature delivery, oligo-
those with antiphospholipid syndrome hydramnios, and intrauterine growth restriction
(Fig. 11.11). Other nonspecific APS skin mani- [71, 72].
festations include atrophie blanche, painful Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome
extremity ulcers that heal as a white atrophic scar (CAPS) is defined as positive antiphospholipid
(Fig. 11.12), and embolic phenomenon leading to antibodies along with three or more organ throm-
acral purpura and gangrene [69]. boses occurring over a short period of time.
Occlusion of small vessels, or thrombotic
microangiopathy, is characteristic. CAPS should
11.4.1 Emergent Complications be distinguished from TTP and disseminated
intravascular coagulation. CAPS is rare, occur-
Thrombosis may occur in large, medium, and ring in only 0.8% of patients with APS, but is
small vessels of the venous and arterial circula- significant due to high mortality rate [73].
tion. Venous thromboses are most common in the
legs, but have been reported in varied sites not
limited to the renal, mesenteric, axillary, and sag- 11.4.2 Laboratory Findings
ittal veins. Arterial events can be the result of
either primary thrombosis or from emboli origi- APS laboratory criteria require at least one of the
nating from valvular vegetations. Transient isch- three following tests, present on two or more
emic attacks are the most frequent manifestation occasions in a period of 12 weeks: lupus antico-
of arterial thrombosis in APS [66, 70]. agulant, IgG, or IgM anticardiolipin antibodies in
APS is a significant cause of recurrent medium-high titers, or IgG, IgM, or anti-®2-GPI
pregnancy loss in lupus patients. Pregnancy antibodies above the 99th percentile [66, 74–76].
216 A. Krishnamurthy et al.
False-positive tests for syphilis often indicate the CAPS patients are in general very ill, and
presence of underlying antiphospholipid antibodies. require anticoagulation, high-dose steroids and
Besides being associated with autoimmune disease, plasma exchange [83].
APS antibodies and can be drug-induced or infec- Women with APS and recurrent miscarriages
tion related [76]. Medications associated with aPL are treated with low-dose aspirin along with
are hydralazine, procainamide, and phenytoin. either heparin or low molecular weight heparin
Bacterial infections, including syphilis, Lyme dis- (LMWH) during subsequent pregnancies [84].
ease, post-streptococcal rheumatic fever, and viral Anticoagulation is continued for 6 weeks after
infections, such as hepatitis A, B, C, mumps, HIV, delivery [85]. Intravenous immunoglobulin with
varicella zoster, EBV, and parvovirus can all result or without steroids is also being evaluated in clin-
in IgM anticardiolipin in the serum [77]. ical trials for use in preventing pregnancy losses
Other lab abnormalities seen in APS are in women with APL. Pregnant APS patients are
thrombocytopenia (typically mild), and less com- at risk for and should be monitored for preec-
monly, Coombs-positive hemolytic anemia. lampsia. The fetus should be monitored for pla-
Antiphospholipid antibodies with thrombocy- cental insufficiency the last weeks of the third
topenia and autoimmune hemolytic anemia are trimester [85].
known as Evans syndrome [78].
11.5 Dermatomyositis
11.4.3 Treatment
Dermatomyositis (DM) is an inflammatory mus-
Patients with APS and history of thrombosis cle disease associated with characteristic skin
require lifelong anticoagulation at an INR of 2–3 manifestations. The cutaneous findings pathog-
for venous events. There is controversy over nomonic for DM are Gottron’s papules, viola-
whether the INR should be kept at a higher level ceous or pink papules of the dorsal metacarpal
for arterial thrombosis [79]. Some studies sug- and interphalangeal joints (Fig. 11.13), and
gest that APL antibody positive SLE patients Gottron’s sign, macular erythema over extensor
may benefit from prophylactic aspirin therapy surfaces such as the elbows and knees (Fig. 11.14).
[80]. Severe cases of APS-associated thrombocy- Lesions resemble cutaneous lupus in that they are
topenia are treated with steroids, IVIG, or sensitive to UV light and have similar histopatho-
splenectomy if resistant [81, 82]. logic findings. Also frequently occurring are the
11 Cutaneous Findings of Collagen Vascular Disease and Related Emergent Complications 217
Fig. 11.18 Digital ischemia and ulceration in SSc Fig. 11.19 Auricular chondritis of relapsing
polychondritis
symptoms and acute phase reactants for diagnosis. drome can be a primary disorder, or can be seen in
The acute phase reactants, erythrocyte sedimen- association with other autoimmune diseases such
tation rate (ESR), and C reactive protein as SLE and RA [176]. The disease can manifest
(CRP) are also used in monitoring disease with a variety of cutaneous signs, the most common
activity [165]. being xerosis. Cutaneous vasculitis, including
cryogolubulinemia, may suggest more serious sys-
temic and extraglandular involvement [177].
11.8.3 Treatment Lymphocytic infiltration of various organs can
yield interstitial pneumonitis, pericarditis, and
Once rheumatoid arthritis is diagnosed, aggres- interstitial nephritis. These features usually
sive therapy with disease-modifying antirheu- appear early in the disease and follow a benign
matic drugs (DMARDs) should be initiated, in course. Arthritis and arthralgias are seen in over
order to prevent further joint damage and subse- half of patients. PBC and celiac sprue have also
quent permanent deformity. been noted to be associated with SS [178, 179].
Methotrexate is considered the anchor drug. If
disease control is not achieved, other DMARDs
such as leflunomide, or sulfasalazine with 11.9.1 Emergent Complications
hydroxychloroquine can be added, or biologic
agents can be employed. Adjunctive treatments There is a 10- to 40-fold increased risk of lym-
for helping with pain and function include gluco- phoma in SS patients. The overall risk of devel-
corticoids, NSAIDs, and physical and occupa- oping lymphoma is 5% in patients with SS.
tional therapy. Patients with SS also have a predilection for vas-
Treatment of rheumatoid vasculitis requires culitis, and in particular type II cryoglobulinemic
high-dose glucocorticoids with or without cyclo- vasculitis is associated with lymphoma (most
phosphamide. Methotrexate is not only a commonly non-Hodgkins type) both indepen-
DMARD, but is also used to improve Felty’s syn- dently and in those with SS. Other risk factors for
drome associated cytopenias. Splenectomy is lymphoma include C4 hypocomplementemia and
indicated for recurrent infections or noncorrect- hard enlargement of parotid or lacrimal glands
ing leukopenia, and may also improve leg ulcers [180]. Neurologic complications include senso-
[165, 171]. rimotor neuropathy, though cranial neuropathies,
Scleritis requires topical or local steroids with central demyelinating disease, and optic atrophy
or without systemic immunosuppressants. have also been described. Central nervous system
Hematologic findings such as anemia of chronic vasculitis is uncommon [181].
disease and thrombocytosis, tend to resolve as Three prognostic factors for adverse outcomes
the RA comes under control with immunosup- in primary SS are purpura, hypocomplement-
pression. Peripheral neuropathy from inflamed emia, and cryoglobulinemia, as identified in sev-
synovial entrapment will also improve with RA eral prospective studies of SS pts. Such outcomes
treatment. Atlantoaxial subluxation greater than include systemic vasculitis, B cell lymphoma,
8 mm from cervical involvement usually requires and death [182, 183, 184].
surgical intervention [163, 173–175].
11.9.3 Treatment
11.10.3 Treatment
15. Santos-Ocampo AS, Mandell BF, Fessler BJ. Alveolar regarding mucocutaneous involvement. Clin Exp
hemorrhage in systemic lupus erythematosus. Chest. Rheumatol. 1996;14 Suppl 16:s17–22.
2000;118:1083–90. 31. Obermoser G, Sontheimer RD, Zelger B. Overview of
16. Zamora MR, Warner ML, Tuder R, et al. Diffuse alve- common, rare and atypical manifestations of cutane-
olar hemorrhage and systemic lupus erythematosus: ous lupus erythematosus and histopathological corre-
clinical presentation, histology, survival, and out- lates. Lupus. 2010;19(9):1050–70.
come. Medicine (Baltimore). 1997;76:192–202. 32. Ting W, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis-like acute
17. Manzi S, Meilahn EN, Rairie JE, et al. Age-specific cutaneous lupus erythematosus and the spectrum of
incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in the acute syndrome of apoptotic pan-epidermolysis
women with systemic lupus erythematosus: compari- (ASAP): a case report, concept review and proposal
son with the Framingham study. Am J Epidemiol. for new classification of lupus erythematosus vesicu-
1997;145:408–15. lobullous skin lesions. Lupus. 2004;13:941.
18. de Leeuw K, Freire B, Smit AJ, et al. Traditional and 33. Sontheimer RD. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythema-
non-traditional risk factors contribute to the develop- tosus. Clin Dermatol. 1985;3(3):58–68.
ment of accelerated atherosclerosis in patients with sys- 34. Vera-Recabarren MA, et al. Comparative analysis of sub-
temic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2006;15:675–82. acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and chronic cutane-
19. Petri M, Kasitanon N, Lee SS, et al.: for the Systemic ous lupus erythematosus: clinical and immunological
Lupus International Collaborating Clinics. Systemic study of 270 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162:91–101.
Lupus International Collaborating Clinics renal activ- 35. Sontheimer RD, Maddison PJ, Reichlin M, et al.
ity/response exercise: development of a renal activity Serologic and HLA associations in subacute cutane-
score and renal response index. Arthritis Rheum ous lupus erythematosus, a clinical subset of lupus
2008;58:1784–8. erythematosus. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97(5):664–71.
20. Isenberg DA, Lesavre P. Lupus nephritis: assessing 36. Patel P, Werth V. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a
the evidence, considering the future. Lupus. review. Dermatol Clin. 2002;20(3):373–85.
2007;16:210–1. 37. Liu K, Mohan C. What do mouse models teach us
21. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, et al. The about human SLE? Clin Immunol. 2006;119:123.
classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic 38. Massone C, et al. Lupus erythematosus panniculitis
lupus erythematosus revisited. Kidney Int. 2004;65: (lupus profundus): clinical, histopathological, and
521–30. molecular analysis of nine cases. J Cutan Pathol.
22. Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Cantu-Brito C, Garcia-Ramos 2005;32(6):396–404.
G. Acute neurolupus manifested by seizures is associ- 39. Arai S, Katsuoka K. Clinical entity of Lupus erythe-
ated with high frequency of abnormal cerebral blood matosus panniculitis/lupus erythematosus profundus.
flow velocities. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;25(4):348–e354. Autoimmun Rev. 2009;8(6):449–52.
Academic Press: San Diego, 1999, pp. 687e–706. 40. Ruiz H, Sanchez JL. Tumid lupus erythematosus. Am
23. Ozgencil E, Gulucu C, Yalcyn S, Alanoglu Z, Unal N, J Dermatopathol. 1999;21(4):356–60.
Oral M, et al. Seizures and loss of vision in a patient 41. Hedrich CM, Fiebig B, et al. Chilblain lupus erythe-
with systemic lupus erythematosus. Neth J Med. matosus: a review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol.
2007;65(7):274. 2008;27(8):949–54.
24. McCune WJ, Golbus J. Neuropsychiatric Lupus. 42. Ramos-Casals M, et al. Vasculitis in systemic lupus ery-
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1988;14(1):149–67. thematosus: prevalence and clinical characteristics in 670
25. Rothfield N, Sontheimer RD, Bernstein M. Lupus patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2006;85(2):95–104.
erythematosus: systemic and cutaneous manifesta- 43. Satirapoj B, et al. Predictors of renal involvement in
tions. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24(5):348–62. patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Asian
26. Pinkus H. Lichenoid tissue reactions: a speculative Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2007;25(1):17–25.
review of the clinical spectrum of epidermal basal cell 44. Wilson CL, Burge SM, Dean D, et al. Scarring alope-
damage with special reference to erythema dyschro- cia in discoid lupus erythematosus. Br J Dermatol.
micum perstans. Arch Dermatol. 1973;107:840–6. 1992;126(4):307–14.
27. Tebbe B, Orfanos CE. Epidemiology and socioeco- 45. Ortize VG, Krishnan RS, Chen LL, Hsu S.
nomic impact of skin disease in lupus erythematosus. Papulonodular mucinosis in systemic lupus erythema-
Lupus. 1997;6:96. tosus. Dermatol Online J. 2004;10:16.
28. Watanabe T, Tsuchida T. Classification of lupus ery- 46. Rongioletti F, Parodi A, Rebora A. Papular and nodu-
thematosus based upon cutaneous manifestations. lar mucinosis as a sign of lupus erythematosus.
Dermatological, systemic and laboratory findings in Dermatologica. 1990;180:221–3.
191 patients. Dermatology. 1995;190:277. 47. Bean SF, Lynch FW. Senear-Usher syndrome (pem-
29. Walling HW, Sontheimer RD. Cutaneous lupus ery- phigus erythematosus). Immunofluorescent studies in
thematosus: issues in diagnosis and treatment. Am J a patient. Arch Dermatol. 1970;101(6):642–5.
Clin Dermatol. 2009;10(6):365–81. 48. Giannouli S, Voulgarelis M, Ziakas PD, Tzioufas AG.
30. Vitali C, et al. International survey on the manage- Anaemia in systemic lupus erythematosus: from
ment of patients with SLE: I. General data on the par- pathophysiology to clinical assessment. Ann Rheum
ticipating centers and the results of a questionnaire Dis. 2006;65(2):144–8.
11 Cutaneous Findings of Collagen Vascular Disease and Related Emergent Complications 229
49. Avihingsanon Y, Hirankarn N. Major lupus organ 63. Gladman G, Silverman ED, et al. Fetal echocardio-
involvement: severe lupus nephritis. Lupus. graphic screening of pregnancies of mothers with
2010;19(12):1391–8. anti-Ro and/or anti-La antibodies. Am J Perinatol.
50. Jessop S, Whitelaw D, Jordaan F. Drugs for discoid 2002;19(2):73–80.
lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 64. Mevorach D, Elchalal U, Rein AJ. Prevention of com-
2001;CD002954. plete heart block in children of mothers with anti-
51. Clowse ME, Magder L, Witter F, Petri M. SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La autoantibodies: detection
Hydroxychloroquine in lupus pregnancy. Arthritis and treatment of first-degree atrioventricular block.
Rheum. 2006;54:3640–7. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009;21(5):478–82.
52. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zeron P, 65. Neiman AR, Lee LA, Weston WL, Buyon JP.
Khamashta MA. Clinical efficacy and side effects of Cutaneous manifestations of neonatal lupus without
antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: a sys- heart block: characteristics of mothers and children
tematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:20–8. enrolled in a national registry. J Pediatr. 2000;137(5):
53. Avina-Zubieta J, Johnson E, Suaarez-Almazor M, 674–80.
Russell A. Incidence of myopathy in patients treated 66. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, et al. International
with antimalarials: a report of three cases and a review consensus statement on an update of the classification
of the literature. Br J Rheumatol. 1995;34:166–70. criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
54. Marmor MF, Carr RE, Easterbrook M, et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:295–306.
Recommendations on screening for chloroquine and 67. Bowie EJ, Thompson Jr JH, Pascuzzi CA, Owen Jr
hydroxychloroquine retinopathy: a report by the CA. Thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus
American Academy of Ophthalmology. despite circulating anticoagulants. J Lab Clin Med.
Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1377–82. 1963;62:416–30.
55. Bertsias G, Ioannidis JP, Boletis J, et al. Task Force of 68. Rand JH. The antiphospholipid syndrome. Annu Rev
the EULAR Standing Committee for International Med. 2003;54:409–24.
Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics. EULAR rec- 69. Francès C, Niang S, Laffitte E, et al. Dermatologic
ommendations for the management of systemic lupus manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome: two
erythematosus. Report of a Task Force of the EULAR hundred consecutive cases. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;
Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies 52:1785–93.
Including Therapeutics. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(2): 70. Brey RL. Differential diagnosis of central nervous
195–205. system manifestations of the antiphospholipid anti-
56. Callen JP, Spencer LV, Burruss JB, Holtman J. body syndrome. J Autoimmun. 2000;15:133–8.
Azathioprine. An effective, corticosteroid-sparing 71. Lockshin MD, Quamar T, Drusin ML, et al. Antibody
therapy for patients with recalcitrant cutaneous lupus to cardiolipin, lupus anticoagulant, and fetal death. J
erythematosus or with recalcitrant cutaneous leukocy- Rheumatol. 1987;14:259–62.
toclastic vasculitis. Arch Dermatol. 72. Branch DW, Khamashta MA. Antiphospholipid syn-
1991;127(4):515–22. drome: obstetric diagnosis, management, and contro-
57. Wallace DJ, Stohl W, Furie RA, Lisse JR, McKay JD, versies. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:1333–44.
Merrill JT, Petri MA, Ginzler EM, Chatham WW, 73. Cervera R, Piette JC, Font J, et al. Antiphospholipid
McCune WJ, Fernandez V, Chevrier MR, Zhong ZJ, syndrome: clinical and immunologic manifestations
Freimuth WW. A phase II, randomized, double-blind, and patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000
placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of belimumab patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:1019–27.
in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. 74. Brandt JT, Triplett DA, Alving B, et al. Criteria for the
Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(9):1168–78. diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update. On
58. Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri SV. Immunomodulation of behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/
autoimmune and inflammatory diseases with intrave- Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and
nous immune globulin. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: Standardisation Committee of the ISTH. Thromb
747–55. Haemost. 1995;74:1185–90.
59. Herzinger T, Plewig G. Use of sunscreens to protect 75. Pengo V, Tripodi A, Reber G, et al. Update of the
against ultraviolet induced lupus erythematosus. guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection. J Thromb
Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:3045–6. Haemost. 2009;10:1737–40.
60. Sontheimer RD. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythema- 76. Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T, et al. International
tosus: 25-year evolution of a prototypic subset (subphe- consensus statement on preliminary classification cri-
notype) of lupus erythematosus defined by characteristic teria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of
cutaneous, pathological, immunological, and genetic an international workshop. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;
findings. Autoimmun Rev. 2005;4:253–63. 42:1309–11.
61. Lee LA. Neonatal lupus: clinical features and man- 77. Cohen D, Berger SP, Steup-Beekman GM,
agement. Pediatr Drugs. 2004;6(2):71–8. Bloemenkamp KW, Bajema IM. Diagnosis and man-
62. Boh EE. Neonatal lupus erythematosus. Clin agement of the antiphospholipid syndrome. BMJ.
Dermatol. 2004;22(2):125–8. 2010;340:c2541.
230 A. Krishnamurthy et al.
78. Boren T, Reyes C, Montenegro R, Raimer K. A case study with screening recommendations. Arch
of Evan’s syndrome in pregnancy refractory to pri- Dermatol. 2010;146(7):729–38.
mary treatment options. J Matern Fetal Neonatal 94. Fathi M, Dastmalchi M, Rasmussen E, et al.
Med. 2007;20(11):843–5. Interstitial lung disease, a common manifestation of
79. Garcia DA, Khamashta MA, Crowther MA. How we newly diagnosed polymyositis and dermatomyositis.
diagnose and treat thrombotic manifestations of the Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:297–301. P-31.
antiphospholipid syndrome: a case-based review. 95. Alyan O, Ozdemir O, Geyik B, Demirkan D.
Blood. 2007;110:3122–7. Polymyositis complicated with complete atrioven-
80. Tektonidou MG, Laskari K, Panagiotakos DB, tricular block: a case report and review of the litera-
Moutsopoulos HM. Risk factors for thrombosis ture. Angiology. 2003;54:729–31.
and primary thrombosis prevention in patients with 96. Yazici Y, Kagen LJ. Cardiac involvement in myosi-
systemic lupus erythematosus with or without tis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:663–5.
antiphospholipid antibodies. Arthritis Rheum 97. Airio A, et al. Elevated cancer incidence in patients
(Arthritis Care Res). 2009;61:29–36. with dermatomyositis: a population based study. J
81. Bayry J, Negi VS, Kaveri SV. Intravenous immuno- Rheumatol. 1995;22:1300.
globulin therapy in rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev 98. Yazici Y, Kagen LJ. The association of malignancy
Rheumatol. 2011;7(6):349–59. with myositis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2000;12:498.
82. Tripodi A, de Groot PG, Pengo V. Antiphospholipid 99. Stockton D, et al. Risk of cancer in patients with der-
syndrome: laboratory detection, mechanisms of action matomyositis or polymyositis, and follow-up impli-
and treatment. J Intern Med. 2011;270(2):110–22. cations: a Scottish population-based cohort study. Br
83. Asherson RA, Cervera R, De Groot PG, et al. J Cancer. 2001;85:41.
Catastrophic antiphospholipid sydrome: interna- 100. Chen YJ, et al. Predicting factors of malignancy in
tional consensus statements on classification criteria dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a case–control
and treatment guidelines. Lupus. 2003;12:530–4. study. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:825.
84. Petri M, Qazi U. Management of antiphospholipid 101. Hill CL, Zhang Y, Sigurgeirsson B, Pukkala E,
syndrome in pregnancy. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. Mellemkjaer L, Airio A, Evans SR, Felson DT.
2006;32:591–607. Frequency of specific cancer types in dermatomyosi-
85. Le Thi Huong D, Wechsler B, Vauthier-Brouzes D, tis and polymyositis: a population-based study.
et al. The second trimester Doppler ultrasound Lancet. 2001;357:96–100.
examination is the best predictor of late pregnancy 102. Sontheimer RD. Cutaneous features of classic der-
outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus and/or the matomyositis and amyopathic dermatomyositis.
antiphospholipid syndrome. Rheumatology Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1999;11:475–82.
(Oxford). 2006;45:332–8. 103. Pachman LM, Hayford JR, Chung A, Daugherty
86. Santmyire-Rosenberger B, Dugan E. Skin involve- CA, Pallansch MA, Fink CW, Gewanter HL, Jerath
ment in dermatomyositis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. R, Lang BA, Sinacore J, Szer IS, Dyer AR, Hochberg
2003;15:714–22. MC. Juvenile dermatomyositis at diagnosis: clinical
87. Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyosi- characteristics of 79 children. J Rheumatol.
tis. N Engl J Med. 1975;292:344–7. 1998;25(6):1198–204.
88. Gerami P, Schope JM, McDonald L, et al. A system- 104. Robinson AB, Reed AM. Clinical features, patho-
atic review of adult onset clinically amyopathic der- genesis and treatment of juvenile and adult dermato-
matomyositis (dermatomyositis sine myositis): a myositis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7(11):664–75.
missing link within the spectrum of the idiopathic 105. Targoff IN. Laboratory testing in the diagnosis and
inflammatory myopathies. J Am Acad Dermatol. management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.
2006;54:597–613. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2002;28(4):859–90.
89. Kang EH, Lee EB, Shin KC, et al. Interstitial lung 106. Oddis CV. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: man-
disease in patients with polymyositis, dermatomyo- agement and prognosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am.
sitis and amyopathic dermatomyositis. Rheumatology. 2002;28:979–1001.
2005;44:1282–6. 107. Christopher-Stine L, Plotz PH. Adult inflammatory
90. Suda T, Fuijsawa T, Enomoto N, et al. Interstitial myopathies. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol.
lung diseases associated with amyopathic dermato- 2004;18:331–44.
myositis. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:1005–12. 108. Dalakas MC, Illa I, Dambrosia JM, et al. A con-
91. Tillie-Leblond I, Wislez M, Valeyre D, et al. Interstitial trolled trial of high-dose intravenous immune globu-
lung disease and anti-Jo-1 antibodies: difference between lin infusions as treatment for dermatomyositis. N
acute and gradual onset. Thorax. 2008;63:53–9. Engl J Med. 1993;329:1993–2000.
92. Quain RD, Werth VP. Management of cutaneous 109. Buchbinder R, Forbes A, Hall S, Dennett X, Giles G.
dermatomyositis: current therapeutic options. Am J Incidence of malignant disease in biopsy-proven
Clin Dermatol. 2006;7(6):341–51. inflammatory myopathy. A population-based cohort
93. Morganroth PA, Kreider ME, Okawa J, Taylor L, study. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:1087–95.
Werth VP. Interstitial lung disease in classic and 110. Perera A, Fertig N, Lucas M, et al. Clinical subsets,
skin-predominant dermatomyositis: a retrospective skin thickness progression rate, and serum antibody
11 Cutaneous Findings of Collagen Vascular Disease and Related Emergent Complications 231
levels in systemic sclerosis patients with anti-topoi- HH, Coppock J, Herrick A, Merkel PA, Simms R,
somerase I antibody. Arthritis Rheum. Denton CP, Furst D, Nguyen N, Gaitonde M, Black
2007;56:2740–6. C. Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: prevention by
111. Steen V, Medsger T. Severe organ involvement in treatment with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor
systemic sclerosis with diffuse scleroderma. Arthritis antagonist. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(12):3985–93.
Rheum. 2000;43(11):2437–44. 127. Admou B, Essaadouni L, Amal S, Arji N, Chabaa L,
112. Poormoghim H, Lucas M, Fertig N, Medsger Jr TA. El Aouad R. Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis:
Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma: demographic, clinical interest and diagnosis approach. Ann Biol
clinical, and serologic features and survival in forty- Clin (Paris). 2009;67(3):273–81.
eight patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(2):444–51. 128. Steen VD, Ziegler GL, Rodnan GP, Medsger Jr TA.
113. Steen V, Medsger Jr TA. Predictors of isolated Clinical and laboratory associations of anticentrom-
pulmonary hypertension in patients with systemic ere antibody in patients with progressive systemic
sclerosis and limited cutaneous involvement. sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(2):125–31.
Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(2):516–22. 129. Kuwana M, Kaburaki J, Okano Y, Tojo T, Homma
114. Shand L, Lunt M, Nihtyanova S, Hoseini M, Silman M. Clinical and laboratory associations of anticen-
A, Black CM, Denton CP. Relationship between tromere antibody in patients with progressive sys-
change in skin score and disease outcome in diffuse temic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum.
cutaneous systemic sclerosis: application of a latent 1994;37(1):75–83.
linear trajectory model. Arthritis Rheum. 130. Hoyles RK, Ellis RW, Wellsbury J, Lees B, Newlands
2007;56(7):2422–31. P, Goh NS, Roberts C, Desai S, Herrick AL, McHugh
115. Steen VD. Scleroderma renal crisis. Rheum Dis Clin NJ, Foley NM, Pearson SB, Emery P, Veale DJ,
North Am. 2003;29(2):315–33. Denton CP, Wells AU, Black CM, du Bois RM. A
116. Teixeira L, Mahr A, Berezne A, et al. Scleroderma multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind,
renal crisis, still a life threatening complication. Ann placebo-controlled trial of corticosteroids and intra-
N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1108:249–305. venous cyclophosphamide followed by oral azathio-
117. Tashkin DP, Elashoff R, Clements PJ, et al. prine for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis in
Cyclophosphamide versus placebo in scleroderma scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum.
lung disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(25): 2006;54(12):3962–70.
2655–66. 131. Kowal-Bielecka O, Landewé R, Avouac J, Chwiesko
118. Steen VD, Conte C, Owens GR, Medsger Jr TA. S, Miniati I, Czirjak L, Clements P, Denton C, Farge
Severe restrictive lung disease in systemic sclerosis. D, Fligelstone K, Földvari I, Furst DE, Müller-
Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(9):1283–9. Ladner U, Seibold J, Silver RM, Takehara K, Toth
119. Plastiras SC, Karadimitrakis SP, Ziakas PD, et al. BG, Tyndall A, Valentini G, van den Hoogen F,
Scleroderma lung: Initial forced vital capacity as Wigley F, Zulian F, Matucci-Cerinic M, EUSTAR
predictor of pulmonary function decline. Arthritis Co-Authors. EULAR recommendations for the treat-
Rheum. 2006;55(4):598–602. ment of systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR
120. Al-Dhaher FF, Pope JE, Ouimet JM. Semin Arthritis Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR).
Rheum. 2010;39(4):269–77. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(5):620–8. Epub 2009 Jan
121. Di Bello V, Ferri C, Giorgi D, Bianchi M, Bertini A, 15.
Martini A, Storino FA, Paterni M, Pasero G, Giusti 132. Badesch DB, Abman SH, Ahearn GS, Barst RJ,
C. Ultrasonic videodensitometric analysis in sclero- McCrory DC, Simonneau G, McLaughlin VV,
derma heart disease. Coron Artery Dis. American College of Chest Physicians. Medical
1999;10(2):103–10. therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP
122. Plazak W, Zabinska-Plazak E, Wojas-Pelc A, Podolec evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest.
P, Olszowska M, Tracz W, Bogdaszewska- 2004;126(1 Suppl):35S–62.
Czabanowska J. Heart structure and function in sys- 133. Galiè N, Ghofrani HA, Torbicki A, Barst RJ, Rubin
temic sclerosis. Eur J Dermatol. 2002;12(3):257–62. LJ, Badesch D, Fleming T, Parpia T, Burgess G,
123. Ebert EC. Esophageal disease in scleroderma. J Clin Branzi A, Grimminger F, Kurzyna M, Simonneau G,
Gastroenterol. 2006;40:769–75. Sildenafil Use in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
124. Ingraham KM, O’Brien MS, Shenin M, Derk CT, (SUPER) Study Group. Sildenafil citrate therapy for
Steen VD. Gastric antral vascular ectasia in systemic pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med.
sclerosis: demographics and disease predictors. J 2005;353(20):2148–57.
Rheumatol. 2010;37(3):603–7. 134. Kent PD, Michet Jr CJ, Luthra HS. Relapsing poly-
125. Rigamonti C, Shand LM, Feudjo M, et al. Clinical chondritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol.
features and prognosis of primary biliary cirrhosis 2004;16(1):56–61.
associated with systemic sclerosis. Gut. 135. Francès C, ElRassi R, Laporte JL, Rybojad M,
2006;55(3):388–94. Papo T, Piette JC. Dermatologic manifestations of
126. Korn JH, Mayes M, Matucci Cerinic M, Rainisio M, relapsing polychondritis. A study of 200 cases at a
Pope J, Hachulla E, Rich E, Carpentier P, Molitor J, single center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2001;80(3):
Seibold JR, Hsu V, Guillevin L, Chatterjee S, Peter 173–9.
232 A. Krishnamurthy et al.
136. Eng J, Sabanathan S. Airway complications in 155. Amital A, Shitrit D, Adir Y. The lung in rheumatoid
relapsing polychondritis. Ann Thorac Surg. arthritis. Presse Med. 2011;40(1 Pt 2):e31–48.
1991;51(4):686–92. 156. Galor A, Thorne JE. Scleritis and peripheral ulcerative
137. Ernst A, Rafeq S, Boiselle P, Sung A, Reddy C, et al. keratitis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33(4):
Relapsing polychondritis and airway involvement. 835–54.
Chest. 2009;135:1024–30. 157. Rapoport RJ, Kozin F, Mackel SE, Jordon RE.
138. Staats BA, Utz JP, Michet CJ. Relapsing polychon- Cutaneous vascular immunofluorescence in rheumatoid
dritis. Sem Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;23: arthritis. Correlation with circulating immune com-
145–54. plexes and vasculitis. Am J Med. 1980;68:325–31.
139. Barretto S, Oliveira GH, Michet CJ, Nyman M, 158. Smith PH, Benn RT, Sharp J. Natural history of
Edwards WD, Kullo IJ. Multiple cardiovascular rheumatoid cervical luxations. Ann Rheum Dis.
complications in a patient with relapsing polychon- 1972;31(6):431–9.
dritis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:971–4. 159. Felty AR. Chronic arthritis in the adult associated
140. Dib C, Moustafa SE, Mookadam M, Zehr K, Michet with splenomegaly and leukopenia: a report of five
CJ, Mookadam F. Surgical treatment of the cardiac cases of an unusual clinical syndrome. Bull Johns
manifestations of relapsing polychondritis. Mayo Hopkins Hosp. 1924;35:16–20. 1991;23:3328–9.
Clin Proc. 2006;81:772–6. 160. Gridley G, Klippel JH, Hoover RN, Fraumeni Jr JF.
141. Dalal BI, Wallace AC, Slinger RP. IgA nephropathy Incidence of cancer among men with the Felty
in relapsing polychondritis. Pathology (Phila). syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:35–9.
1988;20(1):85–9. 161. Campion G, Maddison PJ, Goulding N, James I,
142. Chang-Miller A, Okamura M, Torres VE, et al. Renal Ahern MJ, Watt I, et al. The Felty syndrome: a case-
involvement in relapsing polychondritis. Medicine matched study of clinical manifestations and out-
(Baltimore). 1987;66(3):202–17. come, serologic features, and immunogenetic
143. Isaak BL, Liesegang TJ, Michet CJ. Ocular and sys- associations. Medicine. 1990;69:69–80.
temic findings in relapsing polychondritis. 162. Wilkinson M, Torrance WN. Clinical background of
Ophthalmology. 1986;93(5):681–9. rheumatoid vascular disease. Ann Rheum Dis.
144. Piette JC, Papo T, Chavanon P, Huong DL, Frances 1967;26:475–80.
C, Godeau P. Myelodysplasia and relapsing poly- 163. Thurtle OA, Cawley MI. The frequency of leg ulcer-
chondritis. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(6):1208–9. ation in rheumatoid arthritis: a survey. J Rheumatol.
145. Saadoun D, Deslandre CJ, Allanore Y, et al. Sustained 1983;10:507–9.
response to infliximab in 2 patients with refractory 164. Scott DG, Bacon PA, Tribe CR. Systemic rheuma-
relapsing polychondritis. J Rheumatol. toid vasculitis: a clinical and laboratory study of 50
2003;30:1394–5. cases. Medicine. 1981;602:88–97.
146. Goldenberg G, Sangueza OP, Jorizzo JL. Successful 165. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson
treatment of relapsing polychondritis with mycophe- DT, Bingham III CO, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR,
nolate mofetil. J Dermatol Treat. 2006;17:158–9. Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH,
147. Wendling D, Govindaraju S, Prati C, et al. Efficacy Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM,
of anakinra in a patient with refractory relapsing Hobbs K, Huizinga TW, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Kvien
polychondritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75:622–4. TK, Laing T, Mease P, Ménard HA, Moreland LW,
148. Woodbury K, Smith LJ. Relapsing polychondritis: a Naden RL, Pincus T, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-
rare etiology of dysphonia and novel approach to Biernat E, Symmons D, Tak PP, Upchurch KS,
treatment. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(5):1006–8. Vencovský J, Wolfe F, Hawker G. Rheumatoid
149. Young A, Koduri G. Extra-articular manifestations arthritis classification criteria: an American College
and complications of rheumatoidarthritis. Best Pract of Rheumatology/European League Against
Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21(5):907–27. Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis
150. Sayah A, English III JC. Rheumatoid arthritis: a Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–81.
review of the cutaneous manifestations. J Am Acad 166. Geirsson AJ, Sturfelt G, Truedsson L. Clinical and
Dermatol. 2005;53(2):191–209. quiz 210–2. serological features of severe vasculitis in rheuma-
151. Chu P, Connolly MK, LeBoit PE. The histopatho- toid arthritis: prognostic implications. Ann Rheum
logic spectrum of palisaded neutrophilic and granu- Dis. 1987;46:727–33.
lomatous dermatitis in patients with collagen 167. Chen KR, Toyohara A, Suzuki A, Miyakawa S.
vascular disease. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:1278. Clinical and histopathological spectrum of cutane-
152. Hata T, Kavanaugh A. Rheumatoid arthritis in der- ous vasculitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Dermatol.
matology. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24(5):430–7. 2002;147:905–13.
153. Bywaters EG. Peripheral vascular obstruction in 168. Vollertsen RS, Conn DL, Ballard DJ, Ilstrup DM,
rheumatoid arthritis and its relationship to other vas- Kazmar RE, Silverfield JC. Rheumatoid vasculitis:
cular lesions. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(1):84–103. survival and associated risk factors. Medicine.
154. Watts RA, Carruthers DM, Scott DG. Isolated nail 1986;65:365–75.
fold vasculitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum 169. Aggarwal R, Liao K, Nair R, Ringold S, Costenbader
Dis. 1995;54(11):927–9. KH. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibody assays and
11 Cutaneous Findings of Collagen Vascular Disease and Related Emergent Complications 233
their role in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. 183. Papas AS, Sherrer YS, Charney M, Golden HE,
Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(11):1472–83. Medsger Jr TA, Walsh BT, Trivedi M, Goldlust B,
170. Scott DG, Bacon PA. Intravenous cyclophosphamide Gallagher SC. Successful treatment of dry mouth
plus methylprednisolone in treatment of systemic and dry eye symptoms in Sjögren’s syndrome
rheumatoid vasculitis. Am J Med. patients with oral pilocarpine: a randomized, pla-
1984;76(3):377–84. cebo-controlled, dose-adjustment study. J Clin
171. Muramatsu K, Tanaka H, Taguchi T. Peripheral neu- Rheumatol. 2004;10(4):169–77.
ropathies of the forearm and hand in rheumatoid 184. Fox RI, Chan E, Benton L, Fong S, Friedlaender M,
arthritis: diagnosis and options for treatment. Howell FV. Treatment of primary Sjögren’s syn-
Rheumatol Int. 2008;28(10):951–7. drome with hydroxychloroquine. Am J Med.
172. Masson C. Rheumatoid anemia. Joint Bone Spine. 1988;85(4A):62–7.
2011;78(2):131–7. 185. Ng WF, Bowman SJ. Biological therapies in primary
173. Kim DH, Hilibrand AS. Rheumatoid arthritis in the Sjögren’s syndrome. Expert Opin Biol Ther.
cervical spine. J Am Acad Ortho Surg. 2011;11(7):921–36.
2005;13(7):463–74. 186. International Study Group for Behçet’s Disease.
174. Ramos-Casals M, Solans R, Rosas J, Camps MT, Gil Criteria for diagnosis of Behçet’s disease. Lancet.
A, Del Pino-Montes J, Calvo-Alen J, Jiménez- 1990;335(8697):1078–80.
Alonso J, Micó ML, Beltrán J, Belenguer R, Pallarés 187. Kapsimali VD, Kanakis MA, Vaiopoulos GA,
L, GEMESS Study Group. Primary Sjögren syn- Kaklamanis PG. Etiopathogenesis of Behçet’s dis-
drome in Spain: clinical and immunologic expres- ease with emphasis on the role of immunological
sion in 1010 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). aberrations. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29(11):1211–6.
2008;87(4):210–9. 188. Yazici Y, Yurdakul S, Yazici H. Behçet’s syndrome.
175. Fox RI, Fox CM. Sjogren’s syndrome. In: Hertl M, Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2010;12(6):429–35.
editor. Autoimmune diseases of the skin: pathogen- 189. Mendes D, Correia M, Barbedo M, Vaio T, Mota M,
esis, diagnosis, and management. New York, NY: Gonçalves O, Valente J. Behçet’s disease—a contem-
Springer Wien NewYork; 2011. p. 283–324. porary review. J Autoimmun. 2009;32(3–4):178–88.
176. Invernizzi P, Battezzati PM, Crosignani A, Zermiani 190. Taylor SR, Singh J, Menezo V, Wakefield D,
P, Bignotto M, Del Papa N, Zuin M, Podda M. McCluskey P, Lightman S. Behçet Disease: visual
Antibody to carbonic anhydrase II is present in pri- prognosis and factors influencing the development
mary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) irrespective of antimi- of visual loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(6):
tochondrial antibody status. Clin Exp Immunol. 1059–66. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
1998;114(3):448–54. 191. Saadoun D, Wechsler B, Desseaux K, Le Thi Huong
177. Sheikh SH, Shaw-Stiffel TA. The gastrointestinal D, Amoura Z, Resche-Rigon M, Cacoub P. Mortality
manifestations of Sjögren’s syndrome. Am J in Behçet’s disease. Arthritis Rheum.
Gastroenterol. 1995;90(1):9–14. 2010;62(9):2806–12.
178. Voulgarelis M, Dafni UG, Isenberg DA, 192. Calamia KT, Wilson FC, Icen M, Crowson CS, Gabriel
Moutsopoulos HM. Malignant lymphoma in primary SE, Kremers HM. Epidemiology and clinical charac-
Sjögren’s syndrome: a multicenter, retrospective, teristics of Behçet’s disease in the US: a population-
clinical study by the European Concerted Action on based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(5):600–4.
Sjögren’s Syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 193. Calamia KT, Schirmer M, Melikoglu M. Major ves-
1999;42(8):1765–72. sel involvement in Behçet’s disease: an update. Curr
179. Font J, Ramos-Casals M, de la Red G, Pou A, Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23(1):24–31.
Casanova A, García-Carrasco M, Cervera R, Molina 194. Siva A, Saip S. The spectrum of nervous system
JA, Valls J, Bové A, Ingelmo M, Graus F. Pure sen- involvement in Behçet’s syndrome and its differen-
sory neuropathy in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. tial diagnosis. J Neurol. 2009;256(4):513–29.
Long-term prospective follow up and review of the 195. Yazici H, Pazarli H, Barnes CG, Tüzün Y, Ozyazgan
literature. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(7):1552–7. Y, Silman A, Serdaroğlu S, Oğuz V, Yurdakul S, Lovatt
180. Brito-Zerón P, Ramos-Casals M, Bove A, Sentis J, GE, et al. A controlled trial of azathioprine in Behçet’s
Font J. Predicting adverse outcomes in primary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(5):281–5.
Sjogren’s syndrome: identification of prognostic fac- 196. Kaklamani VG, Kaklamanis PG. Treatment of
tors. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(8):1359–62. Behçet’s disease—an update. Semin Arthritis
181. Ioannidis JP, Vassiliou VA, Moutsopoulos HM. Long- Rheum. 2001;30(5):299–312.
term risk of mortality and lymphoproliferative dis- 197. Ahn JK, Lee YS, Jeon CH, Koh EM, Cha HS.
ease and predictive classification of primary Sjögren’s Treatment of venous thrombosis associated with
syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(3):741–7. Behçet’s disease: immunosuppressive therapy alone
182. Theander E, Manthorpe R, Jacobsson LT. Mortality versus immunosuppressive therapy plus anticoagu-
and causes of death in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: lation. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27(2):201–5.
a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 198. Willkens RF, Arnett FC, Bitter T, Calin A, Fisher L,
2004;50(4):1262–9. Ford DK, Good AE, Masi AT. Reiter’s syndrome.
234 A. Krishnamurthy et al.
Evaluation of preliminary criteria for definite dis- 206. Cagatay Y, Gul A, Cagatay A, Kamali S, Karadeniz
ease. Arthritis Rheum. 1981;24(6):844–9. A, Inanc M, Ocal L, Aral O, Konice M. Adult-onset
199. Carter JD. Bacterial agents in spondyloarthritis: a Still’s disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(7):
destiny from diversity? Best Pract Res Clin 1050–5.
Rheumatol. 2010;24(5):701–14. 207. Crispín JC, Martínez-Baños D, Alcocer-Varela J.
200. Carter JD, Hudson AP. The evolving story of Adult-onset still disease as the cause of fever of
Chlamydia-induced reactive arthritis. Curr Opin unknown origin. Medicine (Baltimore). 2005;84(6):
Rheumatol. 2010;22(4):424–30. 331–7.
201. Schneider JM, Matthews JH, Graham BS. Reiter’s 208. Ishii T, Sasaki T, Muryoi T, Murai C, Hatakeyama A,
syndrome. Cutis. 2003;71(3):198–200. Oosaki H, Yusa A, Kawanami T, Yoshinaga K.
202. Wu IB, Schwartz RA. Reiter’s syndrome: the classic Systemic amyloidosis in a patient with adult onset
triad and more. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(1): Still’s disease. Intern Med. 1993;32(1):50–2.
113–21. 209. Fukaya S, Yasuda S, Hashimoto T, Oku K, Kataoka
203. Kvien TK, Gaston JS, Bardin T, Butrimiene I, H, Horita T, Atsumi T, Koike T. Clinical features of
Dijkmans BA, Leirisalo-Repo M, Solakov P, haemophagocytic syndrome in patients with sys-
Altwegg M, Mowinckel P, Plan PA, Vischer T, temic autoimmune diseases: analysis of 30 cases.
EULAR. Three month treatment of reactive arthritis Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(11):1686–91.
with azithromycin: a EULAR double blind, placebo 210. Schmidt E, Brocker EB, Goebeler M. Rituximab in
controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(9): treatment-resistant autoimmune blistering skin disor-
1113–9. ders. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008;34(1):56–64.
204. Egsmose C, Hansen TM, Andersen LS, Beier JM, 211. Moreland LW, Curtis JR. Systemic nonarticular
Christensen L, Ejstrup L, Peters ND, van der Heijde manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: focus on
DM. Limited effect of sulphasalazine treatment in inflammatory mechanisms. Semin Arthritis Rheum.
reactive arthritis. A randomised double blind pla- 2009;39(2):132–43.
cebo controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(1): 212. Irie F, Kobayashi M, Hirayama K, Nagase S, Iitsuka
32–6. T, Yamaguchi N, Koyama A. Rheumatoid arthritis
205. Bagnari V, Colina M, Ciancio G, Govoni M, Trotta associated with membranous nephropathy and IgA
F. Adult-onset Still’s disease. Rheumatol Int. nephritis with necrotizing lesions. Nephrol Dial
2010;30(7):855–62. Transplant. 1996;11(7):1338–41.
Burn and Other Exposure Injuries
12
Alexander M. Sailon and Peter J. Taub
Table 12.1 American Burn Association criteria for referral to a burn center
Partial thickness burns greater than 10% total body surface area (TBSA)
Burns that involve the face, hands, feet, genitalia, perineum, or major joints
Third-degree burns in any age group
Electrical burns, including lightning injury
Chemical burns
Inhalation injury
Burn injury in patients with preexisting medical disorders that could complicate management, prolong recovery, or
affect mortality
Any patients with burns and concomitant trauma (such as fractures) in which the burn injury poses the greatest risk
of morbidity or mortality. In such cases, if the trauma poses the greater immediate risk, the patient may be initially
stabilized in a trauma center before transfer
Burned children in hospitals without qualified personnel or equipment for the care of children
Burn injury in patients who will require special social, emotional, or rehabilitative intervention
Full-thickness or third-degree burns extend Calculating total burn surface area (TBSA) is the
through the entirety of the dermis (Fig. 12.2). They next critical step as it serves to guide initial fluid
appear dry, leathery and can be white, brown, or resuscitation, nutritional requirements, and appro-
black. These wounds are insensate, do not blanch, priate triage. Of note, partial thickness burns cov-
and do not bleed upon pin-prick. Thrombosed ves- ering more than 10% of TBSA and those in
sels may be visible and are pathognomonic for anatomically sensitive areas (i.e., genitalia, hands,
third-degree burns. Fourth-degree burns extend crossing joints) should be immediately referred to
completely through the skin and subcutaneous tis- a burn center (Table 12.1). It can be estimated by
sues, affecting underlying muscle and bone [4]. either of two methods. Regardless of the technique
Assessing burn depth requires experience and employed, it is important to note that only areas of
often takes several days of observation to deter- partial- and full-thickness injury (second- and
mine the appropriate management. Patients may third-degree burns) should be counted. Superficial
be admitted for observation and reexamined every burns involving only the epidermis (i.e., first-
day as the appearance of the wound becomes degree burns) need not be considered. The “rule of
clearer. Serial debridement of necrotic tissue may nines” is the most popular method and divides the
be required to accurately assess the degree of adult body into anterior torso (18%), posterior
injury. Generally, the wounds that appear likely to torso (18%), legs (18% each), arms (9% each),
heal within 3 weeks can be managed conserva- head/neck (9%), hands (1% each), and perineum
tively, whereas those that will take longer are best (1%) (Fig. 12.3). The percentage assigned to a
treated by excision and grafting. body area reflects its total area, therefore a burn
238 A.M. Sailon and P.J. Taub
a b 18%
9%
36% 36%
9%
1% 1%
18% 13.5%
Fig. 12.3 Rule of nines to calculate total burn surface area in (a) adults and (b) children
involving one-third of the leg should be considered degree of tissue damage, and blood flow. The zone
a 6% TSBA burn. A modified rule of nines is used of coagulation is the portion of the wound that was
for children dividing the body into anterior torso most directly affected by the insult and is charac-
(18%), posterior torso (18%), head/neck (18%), terized by irreversible tissue damage. The zone of
legs (13.5% each), arms (9% each), hands (1% stasis is the surrounding ischemic area that is
each), and perineum (1%). Because the propor- potentially salvageable. Fluid resuscitation seeks
tions for infants and children differ significantly to increase perfusion in this area and prevent pro-
from each other and adults, Lund and Browder gression to skin necrosis. The zone of hyperemia
charts are available to provide a more precise esti- is the most peripheral area and is characterized by
mate of TBSA based on the patient’s age. For inflammation leading to increased blood flow and
small or scattered burns, a second technique for increased vascular permeability causing edema.
calculating burn area involves using the patient’s This area invariably recovers rapidly over the
hand (note: not the examiner’s). The patient’s hand course of a few days [2].
represents approximately 1% of the body surface
area and can be used to estimate TBSA by count-
ing how many “hands” are required to cover the 12.3 Management
area of a burn [5].
12.3.1 Fluid Resuscitation
12.2.3 Zones of Injury Historically, high early mortality rates seen fol-
lowing burn injury were in part related to unrec-
The initial effect caused by a burn can be generally ognized fluid loss and inadequate resuscitation.
divided into three distinct zones based on histology, Hypovolemia develops quickly due to evaporation
12 Burn and Other Exposure Injuries 239
Table 12.2 Parkland Formula: used to determine fluid potential systemic sequelae such as bacteremia,
resuscitation in the first 24 h sepsis, and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome.
Parkland formula Minimizing exposure to pathogens and treating
Total fluid volume = 4 (cc/kg) × weight (kg) × TBSA (%) infections early are critical to successful burn
One-half of the total fluid volume should be administered management as infection remains responsible for
in the first 8 h, the second half in the subsequent 16 h. the majority of mortalities. Although wound
Total burn surface area (TBSA)
infections are common, many burn patients are
also at risk for pneumonia if they are intubated,
from a compromised skin barrier and extravas- immobile, or septic, or if they have suffered an
tion of fluid into unburned tissue. Today, burns of inhalation injury or chest wall injury that limits
significant size (greater than 10% total body sur- thoracic cage excursion.
face area) are managed with fluid replacement Although burn wounds are initially sterile,
according to one of several described protocols. gram-positive bacteria may survive within the
The more widely used Parkland Formula calcu- sweat glands and hair follicles and will quickly
lates the amount of total fluid requirement over colonize the wound within 24–48 h if no antimi-
the first 24-h period following the injury. Total crobial agent is used. At approximately 1 week
fluid volume is calculated as the patient’s weight post-injury, the wound may be colonized by an
in kilograms multiplied by four and then by the assortment of gram-positive bacteria, gram-nega-
total body surface area of second- and third- tive bacteria, and yeast or fungi. Microbes that
degree burns in percentage points. One-half the colonize the wound may arise from the host’s
calculated volume is given over the first 8 h from own gastrointestinal or respiratory flora, or they
the time of injury (not from the time of evalua- may originate from the hospital environment.
tion). The second half is given over the next 16 h Staphylococcus aureus is a common etiologic
(Table 12.2). Regardless of the formula used, the agent of burn wound infections, particularly ones
clinician should bear in mind that any mathemati- arising soon after injury. However, Pseudomonas
cal calculation of fluid requirements is merely an aeruginosa has become the predominant agent
estimate. Close monitoring of the response to overall in a number of burn centers. It is often
fluid administration and physiologic tolerance of characterized by a greenish-blue discharge and a
the patient is crucial. Fluid management in the characteristic grape-like odor. Gram-negative
pediatric population can be challenging, espe- bacteria have become a more frequent cause of
cially in infants where lack of renal maturation invasive infections as a result of their numerous
and reduced GFR makes resuscitation more deli- virulent factors and antimicrobial resistance
cate. Adequacy of resuscitation should be care- traits. Anaerobes are a less common source of
fully monitored in multiple ways via heart rate, infection and typically occur in the setting of
blood pressure, mental status, acid–base balance, electrical injury or when open wound dressings
etc. Among these methods, urine output is the are used [6].
most accurate. A urine output of 0.5–1.0 ml/kg/h Fungi and yeast tend to colonize wounds later,
indicates that hydration is appropriate. Higher and patients on broad-spectrum antibiotics may
urine outputs may be desired in patients with be at increased risk. Fungal wound infections are
crush or high-voltage electrical injuries where associated with a high mortality and their resis-
myoglobinuria can damage the renal tubules. tance to topical antimicrobials highlights the
importance of aggressive wound debridement.
that the treating clinician be mindful of the fact normal skin should be applied first only in patients
that each burn may vary in depth and, therefore, with a known sulfa allergy.
require different treatment. Initial treatment for
all but superficial burns remains the same. 12.3.3.2 Mafenide Sodium
Clothing, jewelry, and debris should be gently Mafenide sodium (Sulfamylon®) is available as a
removed. Mineral oil can be applied to painlessly water-soluble cream or solution. Like silver sul-
remove charred clothing adherent to a burn. fadiazine, it has broad-spectrum antimicrobial
Wounds should be cleansed with soap and water coverage but unlike other topical agents, mafenide
to remove smaller debris and loose tissue. Intact has excellent penetration, making it the “gold
bullae are best left alone, whereas burst, flaccid standard” for burns of the ear or in the presence
blisters, and frankly necrotic tissue should be of a burn eschar. In such cases, twice daily appli-
scraped off or debrided sharply to prevent infec- cation is necessary. Application tends to be pain-
tion and accurately assess burn depth. A mini- ful, potentially limiting its use. Mafenide is a
mally adherent dressing such as potent carbonic anhydrase inhibitor that can
Vaseline-impregnated gauze should be applied to cause metabolic acidosis, in addition to osmotic
minimize contamination and evaporative loss. diuresis and electrolyte abnormalities [5].
Topical agents play an important role in burn
care by their ability to augment wound healing and 12.3.3.3 Silver Nitrate
prevent infection. Given the variety of agents avail- Silver nitrate is available as a solution-soaked
able, one needs to understand their subtle nuances dressing, and as such, dressings need to be
in order to maximize their potential. Superficial, changed frequently (3–6 times per day) to keep
partial thickness burns that should heal without the wound moist. Application is painless although
surgical intervention should be dressed with an care must be taken as silver nitrate stains clothing
easy-to-apply, topical antimicrobial agent. It is and linens black. It too has broad-spectrum anti-
important to keep in mind that although burn microbial coverage. Silver nitrate is prepared as a
wounds can be initially considered sterile they are hypotonic solution, which can result in electro-
typically colonized quickly by both gram-positive lyte abnormalities, most commonly hyponatremia
and gram-negative bacteria, necessitating the need or hypochloremia, requiring frequent monitoring
for broad-spectrum topical antimicrobial cover- for those with large wounds. The silver ions in
age. Parenteral agents are not recommended in the both silver nitrate and silver sulfadiazine can
absence of multi-organ system involvement. rarely cause methemoglobinemia. Should this
Deeper, partial thickness burns should generally develop, any silver containing agents should be
be treated by tangential excision and grafting. In a immediately discontinued.
similar fashion, full-thickness burns should be
treated with an antimicrobial topical agent capable 12.3.3.4 Other Topical Antimicrobial
of eschar penetration until excision is appropriate. Agents
Over-the-counter ointments, such as bacitracin,
12.3.3.1 Silver Sulfadiazine neomycin, and polymyxin, are commonly used
Silver sulfadiazine (Silvadene®) remains one of for superficial partial-thickness burns, especially
the most popular agents. It is formulated as a on the face, as mentioned previously. These prod-
white, water-soluble cream with broad-spectrum ucts carry a low risk of allergic dermatitis. Of
antimicrobial coverage (including Pseudomonas). note, mupirocin (Bactroban®) is the only agent in
Its application is painless and often found to be this class to be bactericidal against methicillin-
soothing. However, silver sulfadiazine is not able resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
to penetrate a burn eschar, limiting its use in such
wounds. A transient, self-limiting leukopenia 12.3.3.5 Topical Debriding Agents
develops in 3–5% of patients and should not Ointments containing collagenase or papain-urea
require discontinuation. A small test dose on stand apart from the previously mentioned agents
12 Burn and Other Exposure Injuries 241
due to their ability to enzymatically debride non- Table 12.3 Figure 5. Harris-Benedict equation: used to
viable tissue. They are an excellent choice in burn estimate basal energy expenditure (BEE)
wounds with mild necrotic or fibrinous material. Harris-Benedict equation
In these wounds, they can result in a clean dermis For males: BEE = 66 + (13.7 × weight in kg) +
earlier, leading to faster re-epithelialization [5]. (5 × height in cm) − (6.8 × age in years)
For females: BEE = 655 + (9.6 × weight in kg) +
(1.8 × height in cm) − (4.7 × age in years)
pressures of greater than 30 mmHg are meshed at a 3:1 ratio since the resultant skin
confirmatory. Fasciotomies of the affected bridges may rotate to the dermal side when the
extremity are indicated to prevent muscle necro- graft is placed on the recipient site. A meshed
sis and limb loss. graft also minimizes fluid accumulation beneath
Burn injury may also cause acute damage to the graft. Unmeshed grafts are preferred in cos-
regions distal to the injury as a result of circum- metically sensitive areas such as the face since
ferential compression to either the trunk and/or meshed grafts have a hatched or waffle pattern
an extremity due to necrotic skin and soft tissue. once they heal. To prevent accumulation of fluid
Full-thickness injury can produce a tough eschar beneath unmeshed grafts, multiple incisions may
that may compromise distal perfusion of an be made to allow egress of serum or blood.
extremity or ventilation by limiting thoracic cage The skin graft may be affixed to the periphery
excursion. In either situation, an escharotomy is of the debrided area using sutures, staples, or tape.
indicated. This should be done soon after the ini- Several sutures should also be placed centrally to
tial assessment as fluid resuscitation may worsen minimize shearing forces. For added support, a
the problem. Because the skin is insensate, this tie-over bolster, circumferential dressing or nega-
can often be done at the bedside with hand-held tive pressure sponge should be used. If the latter is
electrocautery through the eschar and into the chosen, pressure should be low enough to allow
subcutaneous adipose. The skin should subse- for ingrowth of blood vessels. A splint is also
quently spread restoring distal perfusion. Eventual helpful for burns on an extremity to limit move-
coverage may be completed with autologous split ment and, therefore, shearing forces on the graft.
and full thickness grafts, xenografts, cultured The dressing is changed in 3–5 days to confirm
cells, or alloplastic dressings. take of the graft. Longer times until the first dress-
Following an adequate period of time to allow ing change may be appropriate for meshed grafts
for fluid resuscitation and demarcation of areas with adequate postoperative compression since
of questionable depth, the patient may undergo fluid accumulation is rarer. The first dressing
tangential excision of those areas deemed too change should occur earlier for unmeshed grafts
deep to heal within a reasonable period of time. which may not have ideal compression. At 3 days,
Damage to the appendageal structures in these fluid may be aspirated from beneath a skin graft
deep partial thickness burns limits their ability to without affecting its viability. Graft survival is
reepithelialize. The skin is excised using a thin much less likely if aspiration is delayed. Care
blade with an overlying guard until viable tissue should be exercised such that the graft is not inad-
is encountered. A tourniquet may or may not be vertently removed with the dressing. Failure of
used on an extremity since punctate bleeding graft take is due to one or more complications,
determines adequate perfusion. including an inadequately vascularized wound
Skin is harvested from donor sites that are bed, infection, seroma or hematoma formation,
relatively flat and unnoticeable, such as the lat- and movement of the graft (i.e., shear forces).
eral thigh, lower back, or scalp. Split thickness For areas prone to complications due to sec-
skin is harvested at a depth of roughly 8 to ondary skin contraction with healing (e.g., the
12/1,000 of an inch using an electric dermatome lower eyelid), full thickness grafts should be
that moves a thin blade side to side between a used. These are generally harvested by hand
guarded handle (Fig. 12.4). Firm, consistent pres- using a scalpel just above the level of the subcu-
sure is used to harvest skin of suitable quality. taneous fat. Any remaining fat is then removed
Skin grafts may be placed through a mesher, with a sharp, fine scissor from the undersurface
which punches small holes in the graft at regu- of the graft prior to placement.
larly spaced intervals in order to increase the total In the absence of sufficient healthy skin for
surface area. A graft that is meshed either 1 ½ or grafting, a small amount of epithelial cells may
3 times is valuable when larger amounts of skin be harvested from an unburned area such as the
are needed. Care must be taken with grafts perineum or inner thigh and grown in a labora-
12 Burn and Other Exposure Injuries 243
tory as cultured sheets. Use of cultured epithelial 12.3.6 Caring for Healed Wounds
cells is indicated for very large burns where donor
area is limited. Unfortunately, high cost and lower Caring for a burn does not end once the wound
strength are barriers to more widespread use. has been successfully grafted or re-epithelialized
Xenografts (tissues from other species) have (Fig. 12.5). Nutrition plays a large role in healing
held the promise of a natural replacement mate- and adequate caloric intake following injury must
rial in large supply. They have been used for years be monitored. Healing wounds are sensitive to
but still are complicated by immunologic rejec- ultraviolet (UV) rays, and protection from the
tion. Today, pig skin is used for large burns as a sun is critical. Patients must be reminded to use
temporary occlusive dressing or as a test graft for sunscreen or clothing that covers the wound when
wounds of questionable vascularity. If the xeno- outdoors. Sun exposure can lead to hyperpigmen-
graft fails to take, the wound bed is presumed to tation of the graft or wound.
be inadequate for more valuable autogenous skin. Pruritus is a common complaint since healed
However, if the xenograft successfully takes, it wounds lack adnexal structures needed to keep
may be completely removed in favor of an autog- skin moist. A mild alcohol- and fragrance-free
enous skin graft. Another option is to remove the moisturizer should be applied daily and after
antigenic epidermis from the inert dermis by washing. Despite liberal moisturizer use, many
dermabrasion replacing it with a thinner skin patients still complain of iprutitus. In these cases,
graft. This allows the epidermis to regenerate an oral antihistamine may be beneficial.
more rapidly and subsequently becoming quickly Epidermal inclusion cysts can develop when
available for repeat harvest. skin grafts are placed over a wound bed that con-
Synthetic skin may also be used but is not able tains intact dermal structures or small, micro-
to completely obviate the need for an autogenous scopic patches of epidermis that were not visible
graft. Integra™ (Life Sciences) is composed of to the surgeon at the time of graft placement.
collagen fibrils bound to a silicone sheet replicat- Inclusion cysts may be treated by incision and
ing the dermal and epidermal elements of natural drainage. Larger cysts may require excision [2].
skin. The collagen fibrils are incorporated into Burn scar contractures are one of the most dev-
the healing wound bed to recreate the dermis, astating sequelae of severe injuries. They result
while the silicone acts as a temporary barrier to from prolonged healing, delayed re-epithelializa-
fluid loss similar to a natural epidermis. In 2 or tion, or excessive immobility in a flexed position.
more weeks, the silicone sheet is removed and a Compression dressings, massage, silicone sheets,
thinner skin graft than normal may be applied. and active and passive range of motion activities
244 A.M. Sailon and P.J. Taub
take appropriate precautions as some chemicals course is more insidious, and treatment should
can erode through standard protective equipment. assume that burns will progress significantly in
The affected skin should be copiously irrigated depth during the 24 h after injury. Unlike acids,
for at least 30 min to an hour with room tempera- which result in coagulation necrosis, alkali
ture water. Irrigation should be avoided in the burns are characterized by liquefaction necrosis
presence of chemicals that ignite upon contact and fat saponification. Prolonged vigorous water
with water (e.g., elemental sodium, potassium, lavage for 60 min or more is necessary. Lye
and lithium). Neutralizing the chemical agent (found in drain cleaners and paint thinners) and
should not be attempted, as an exothermic reac- cement are the most common agents causing
tion often develops, potentially causing further alkali burns [7].
injury. Depending on the inciting agent, patients
should be monitored for systemic effects. For
example, phenol causes central nervous system 12.5.3 Tar and Grease
depression and cardiopulmonary collapse.
Although hundreds of chemicals can cause burns, Tar and grease burns are two of the more com-
a few deserve specific mention for their unique monly encountered chemical burns and should be
treatments. initially treated by applying cold water to the hot,
adherent material. In order to easily remove the
tar, bacitracin, mineral oil, or Neosporin should
12.5.1 Hydrofluoric Acid be applied and washed off 12 h later.
in recognizing these signs despite little to no form relationships with others. Studies have also
training or guidance. The challenge remains in shown that feeling of worthlessness continues
distinguishing intentional from accidental injury, into adulthood, causing some victims of abuse to
which occurs commonly in childhood, and recog- consider or attempt suicide [12].
nizing even uncommon skin diseases that may
mimic maltreatment [7].
Approximately 48 States, and the District of 13.3 Workup
Columbia, among other regions, designate pro-
fessionals who are mandated by law to report When initially facing a case of suspected abuse,
child abuse and maltreatment. Physicians and the physician should approach the history like that
other health-care workers are included, as they of any other patient. Clues in the history that sug-
typically have frequent contact with children, gest abuse include an inconsistent or changing
most especially dermatologists, pediatricians, history with vague or absent details [13, 14].
and emergency room physicians, and are the first A delay by the caretaker in seeking help, fre-
professionals to observe and hopefully recognize quently defined as waiting more than 2 h before
the signs of intentional injury. obtaining medical attention, without reasonable
cause, or a child or a patient who has repeated vis-
its for the treatment of injuries is suspicious for
13.2 Demographics abuse. Subtle signs by the child, such as overly
passive or withdrawn behavior, should also be
According to Child Protective Services, more noted by the physician and may be a strong indi-
than 700,000 children were abused or neglected rect indication of abuse. The most common
in 2009. In reality, these cases likely represent findings in the exam of a physically abused child
only a fraction of all cases of abuse [8]. It is include ecchymoses, burns (often cigarette burns),
thought that many cases of abuse remain unre- bites, lacerations, bites, and traumatic alopecia
ported, and abuse is rarely seen or acknowledged [15]; the common findings of maltreatment and
by individuals outside of the immediate family. how to recognize them are reviewed here.
Child maltreatment and abuse remains a con-
cealed and hidden problem and despite the num-
ber of reported cases, some studies estimate that 13.4 Ecchymoses
nearly 25% of the US children undergo some
form of child abuse [9]. Ecchymoses and contusions, recognized clini-
Although the short-term effects of physical cally as subcutaneous purpura, are the most fre-
abuse include lacerations, ecchymoses, burns, quently seen signs of abuse [16, 17] (Fig. 13.1),
and bone fractures, recent studies have found that seen in about 80% of physical abuse cases [18].
the effects of abuse are long-lasting and include Interpreting these findings can be difficult, as
physical and emotional health problems. Cardiac most children are exceedingly physically active
and pulmonary diseases in adulthood have been and will sustain multiple ecchmyoses from rou-
associated with childhood abuse [10, 11]; it is tine play. More than three ecchymoses, larger
thought that prolonged mistreatment of children than 1.0 cm or of varying stages of evolution,
may lead to disruption of brain development and signal possible signs of abuse [7]. Contusions
ultimately lead to dysfunctional immune and ner- and ecchymoses on bony prominences, usual
vous systems [11]. locations for accidental injury, such as the knees,
Skin manifestations of abuse are the most vis- forehead, anterior tibia, are common areas for
ible of all injuries; however other forms of abuse nonviolent trauma in ambulatory children. Areas
including neglect may also beget continuing of the body that are normally protected and not
damage. Emotional effects of maltreatment routinely affected during day-to-day physical
include anxiety, depression, and the inability to play include the posterior and medial thighs,
13 Dermatological Emergencies: Skin Manifestations of Abuse 249
Fig. 13.2 Hot water burn on buttock (reprinted by per- Fig. 13.3 Oval-shaped cigarette burn, accidental
mission, Dr. Pieter J. Offringa, M.D., Ph.D., Pediatrician
Sint Maarten, Dutch West Indies pjosxm@yahoo.com)
bites) and undermining any suspicions of abuse. tions and bruising around the genitals, or
We recommend close communication with the scarring. Sexually transmitted disease in chil-
dermatopathologist reading these particularly dren outside the perinatal period is highly suspi-
sensitive cases allowing for more specific com- cious for sexual abuse. Children more than 3
menting on pertinent positives or negatives of tis- years old who are diagnosed with Chlamydia
sue section. If available, these biopsies should be trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, syphilis,
sent for rush evaluation. Neisseria gonorrhoeae, HIV, HPV infections,
The features of intentional burn injury greatly and anogenital warts or HSV should have a thor-
contrast with those of unintentional injury, such ough investigation to rule out abuse as these
as hot liquid spills, which are more likely to affect findings are strongly diagnostic. It must be noted
the head, neck, and anterior trunk, and have irreg- that Chlamydia trachomatis infection when
ular margins and varied depth [23]. Any findings acquired perinatally may be seen until the sec-
indicating abuse should be documented, with ond or third year of life [29].
notation of location, size, and color, and a photo- Genital warts are most commonly diagnosed
graph taken as an objective record. It is also rec- by dermatologists, and children beyond the peri-
ommended that a skeletal survey be performed natal period with these findings should be evalu-
due to the frequent association with additional ated carefully. Genital warts have been reported
injuries in 20–33% of cases [2, 26, 27]. in children with a history of sexual abuse, but it
can also be seen in children without abuse, much
like bacterial vaginosis, and is not sufficient to
13.6 Sexual Abuse prove sexual abuse [30, 31]; vertical transmission
should be excluded. The verification of sexually
Sexual abuse is defined as any sexual activity transmitted genital warts is made more difficult
with a child below the age of legal consent. by the long latency period before clinical presen-
Sexual activity may be vaginal, oral, rectal, and tation. Specific serotypes of HPV, including
viewing or fondling of any sexual anatomy. The HPV-2 and HPV-3, are typically associated with
sheer volume of children being sexual abused, cutaneous warts, but have also been reported to
currently about 1% of all children yearly, makes cause anogenital HPV lesions in children as well
this diagnosis one that the physician should [32]. Both inappropriate contact via sexual abuse
always remain especially vigilant, as it has and innocuous transmission through casual con-
reached epidemic proportions. According to tact may present similarly as genital warts.
community surveys, prevalence of sexual abuse Currently, detection of HPV DNA is not standard
in children ranges from 6 to 62% and 3 to 16% in practice; HPV is diagnosed through clinical
girls and boys, respectively. It appears that cases identification or through biopsy of lesions.
of child abuse affect girls nearly 2.5 times more Physicians must be cautious with their accusa-
often than boys [28]. tions of abuse. Multiple normal congenital varia-
The most common offender of sexual abuse tions may mimic the findings of abuse. Before
includes nonrelatives who are known to the child declarations of abuse are made against caretak-
and family members [28]. The physician must try ers, variations and conditions including periure-
to illicit a thorough history from the child in thral bands, perineal grooves, lichen sclerosus et
question. The victim is frequently truthful, and atrophicus, lichen planus, Beçhet’s disease, peri-
the confirmatory history by the child is com- anal streptococcal dermatitis, and Kawasaki syn-
monly the gold standard in cases of abuse. drome, among others, should be ruled out.
Unfortunately, there are rarely dermatologic Additional situational findings such as foreign
findings in sexual abuse. body masturbation may also be mistaken for
The physical examination for a sexually abuse. A child who is confirmed to have one sex-
abuse child includes signs of penetrating ano- ually transmitted disease should undergo testing
genital trauma such as hymenal injury, lacera- to look for additional diseases.
252 R. Nazarian et al.
Coin rubbing, also known as spooning or fric- emergency and taking necessary action. There is
tion stroking, is a cultural practice seen in Chinese a moral, ethical, and legal obligation to report any
and Vietnamese cultures, and other Southeast strong suspicion or confirmation of child abuse to
Asian countries such as Cambodia and Laos [50]. child protective services or to make a referral to a
A smooth-edged surface, such as the back of a child advocacy center. All healthcare workers
coin, is placed against lubricated or pre-oiled skin should be able to identify signs of abuse with the
and pressed deep while being dragged down the level of confidence required to potentially set into
muscles along acupuncture meridians [50]; a action the removal of a child from its family. Any
symmetric, linear, “Christmas-tree” pattern on tests, imaging, or biopsies that may help in iden-
the back made up of linear ecchymotic or pete- tifying lesions of abuse, or to rule out their pres-
chial streaks is commonly seen [50, 51]. ence, should be ordered and done quickly with
Children who are subjected to practices based results expedited.
on cultural beliefs may be reluctant to discuss The diagnosis of child abuse is a weighty one
these traditions with their healthcare providers. with severe and enduring consequences. With
Embarrassment over cultural differences or shame confirmation of abuse, and a systematic exclu-
in un-American practices may prevent full-disclo- sion of any potential mimickers or dermatologic
sure when these lesions are noticed by the practi- conditions, child protective services and the facil-
tioner. Physicians should remain sensitive to ethnic ity social worker should be alerted.
differences and consider these customs and cul- A missed diagnosis of child abuse may result in
tural rituals when confronted with unusual cutane- death of the child or continued violence and cruelty
ous lesions suspicious for abuse, and yet are not against the child. Scientific literature shows the sta-
considered harmful to the children affected. tistically increased probability of behavioral, cog-
When evaluating a patient for elder abuse, the nitive, and psychological disorders that emerge in
same signs and findings as those with child abuse adulthood of those abused in childhood, including
may be applied. Delay in seeking treatment, inju- depression, suicide, and addiction [52]; these and
ries in various stages of evolution, or injuries other consequences can be minimized or avoided
inconsistent with history are findings and obser- with a vigilant and conscientious physician, alert to
vations strongly suspicious for abuse. Often signs signs of abuse. However, the physician must always
of neglect, such as malnutrition, poor hygiene, or bear in mind that an erroneous charge of child
decubitus ulcers, are seen, and as most thorough abuse may cause undue anguish and distress and
exams require, the patient should be fully dis- possible loss of reputation to the individual charged
robed and evaluated in entirety. Although much with simultaneous legal ramifications, and ulti-
of elder abuse lies beyond the scope of this chap- mately may lead to unnecessary separation of a
ter, the ubiquitous finding of multipharmacy in child from its home and family.
the geriatric population makes overdosing or
underdosing of their medication another form of
References
abuse.
1. Lyden C. Caring of the victim of child abuse in the
pedriatric intensive care unit. Dimens Crit Care Nurs.
13.9 Conclusion 2009;28:61–6.
2. Purde GF, Hunt JL, Prescott PR. Child abuse by burn-
ing: an index of suspicion. J Trauma. 1988;28:221–4.
Dermatologic emergencies are few in number, 3. Nong The Anh. ‘Pseudo-battered child’ syndrome.
but represent significant clinical scenarios that JAMA 1976;236:2288.
require prompt attention and response by 4. Peddle N, Wang C, Diaz J, Reid R. Current trends in
dermatologists and all health professionals. The child abuse reporting and fatalities: The results of the
2000 annual fifty state survey. Chicago: National
high frequency and incidence of child abuse Committee to Prevent Child Abuse; 2002.
worldwide necessitate a level of suspicion by 5. Herman-Giddens ME, Brown G, Verbiest S, Carlson
physicians in identifying this true dermatologic PJ, Hooten EG, Howell E, Butts JD. Underascertainment
256 R. Nazarian et al.
of child abuse mortality in the United States. JAMA. intentional scalds in children. Burns. 2008;34(8):1072–
1999;282(5):463–7. 81. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
6. Feldman W, Feldman E, Goodman JT, McGrath PJ, 24. Shavit I, Knaani-Levinz H. Images in emergency
Pless RP, Corsini L, Bennett S. Is childhood sexual medicine. Child abuse caused by cigarette burns. Ann
abuse really increasing in prevalence? An analysis of Emerg Med. 2008;51(5):579. 582.
the evidence. Pediatrics. 1991;88(1):29–33. 25. Hobbs CJ. ABC of child abuse. Burns and scalds.
7. Gondim RM, Muñoz DR, Petri V. Child abuse: skin BMJ. 1989;298(6683):1302–5.
markers and differential diagnosis. An Bras Dermatol. 26. Yeoh C, Nixon JW, Dickson W, Kemp A, Sibert JR.
2011;86(3):527–36. Patterns of scald injuries. Arch Dis Child. 1994;71:
8. Hanson RF, Resnick HS, Saunders BE, Kilpatrick DG, 186–8.
Best C. Factors related to the reporting of childhood 27. Renz BM, Sherman R. Abusive scald burns in infants
sexual assault. Child Abuse Negl. 1999;23:559–69. and children: a prospective study. Am Surg. 1993;59:
9. Hopper J. Child sexual abuse: statistics, research. 329–34.
Boston, MA: Boston University School of Medicine 28. Ermertcan AT, Ertan P. Skin manifestations of child
Resources; 1998. abuse. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010;76(4):
10. Lanier P, Jonson-Reid M, Stahlschmidt MJ, Drake B, 317–26.
Constantino J. Child maltreatment and pediatric 29. Bell TA, Stamm WE, Wang SP, Holmes KK, Grayston
health outcomes: a longitudinal study of low-income JT. Chronic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in
children. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010;35(5):511–22. Epub infants. JAMA. 1992;267:400–2.
2009 Oct 1. 30. Hammerschlag MR, Cummings M, Doraiswamy B,
11. Goodwin RD, Stein MB. Association between child- Cox P, McCormack WM. Nonspecific vaginitis fol-
hood trauma and physical disorders among adults in lowing sexual abuse in children. Pediatrics. 1985;75:
the United States. Psychol Med. 2004;34(3):509–20. 1028–31.
12. Kearney CA, Wechsler A, Kaur H, Lemos-Miller A. 31. Marcoux D, Nadeau K, McCuaig C, Powell J,
Posttraumatic stress disorder in maltreated youth: a Oligny LL. Pediatric anogenital warts: a 7-year
review of contemporary research and thought. Clin review of children admitted to a tertiary-care hospi-
Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010;13:46–76. tal in Montreal. Can Pediatr Dermatol. 2006;23:
13. Kos L, Shwayder T. Cutaneous manifestations of 199–207.
child abuse. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006;23:311–20. 32. Handley J, Hanks E, Armstrong K, Bingham A,
14. Hettler J, Greenes DS. Can the initial history predict Dinsmore W, Swann A, Evans MF, McGee JO,
whether a child with a head injury has been abused? O’Leary J. Common association of HPV 2 with ano-
Pediatrics. 2003;111:602–7. genital warts in prepubertal children. Pediatr Dermatol.
15. Swerdlin A, Berkowitz C, Craft N. Cutaneous signs of 1997;14:339–43.
child abuse. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:371–92. 33. Pinheiro Rdos S, de França TR, Ferreira Dde C, Ribeiro
16. Chadwick DL. The diagnosis of inflicted injury in infants CM, Leão JC, Castro GF. Human papillomavirus in the
and young children. Del Med J. 1997;69:345–54. oral cavity of children. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011;40(2):121–6.
17. van Rijn RR, Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T. Educational doi:10.1111/j.1600-0714.2010.00954.x. Epub 2010
paper: imaging child abuse: the bare bones. Eur J Oct 24.
Pediatr. 2012;172(2):215–24 [Epub ahead of print]. 34. Schilling S, Wood JN, Levine MA, Langdon D,
18. Hobbs CJ, Hanks HGI, Wynne JM. Child abuse and Christian CW. Vitamin D status in abused and nona-
neglect: a clinician’s handbook. 2nd ed. London: bused children younger than 2 years old with frac-
Churchill Livingstone; 1999. tures. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):835–41. Epub 2011
19. Zolotor AJ, Robinson TW, Runyan DK, Barr RG, Apr 11.
Murphy RA. The emergence of spanking among a 35. Kemp A, Maguire SA, Sibert J, Frost R, Adams C,
representative sample of children under 2 years of age Mann M. Can we identify abusive bites on children?
in North Carolina. Front Psychiatry. 2011;2:36. Epub Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(11):951.
2011 Jun 24. 36. Bernitz H, Owen JH, van Heerden WF, Solheim T. An
20. Mimasaka S, Ohtani M, Kuroda N, Tsunenari S. integrated technique for the analysis of skin bite
Spectrophotometric evaluation of the age of bruises in marks. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(1):194–8.
children: measuring changes in bruise color as an 37. Seifert D, Püschel K. Subgaleal hematoma in child
indicator of child physical abuse. J Exp Med. abuse. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;157(2–3):131–3. Epub
2010;220(2):171–5. 2005 Sep 26.
21. Toon MH, Maybauer DM, Arceneaux LL, Fraser JF, 38. Isaac R, Lyn M, Triggs N. Lichen sclerosus in the dif-
Meyer W, Runge A, Maybauer MO. Children with ferential diagnosis of suspected child abuse cases.
burn injuries-assessment of trauma, neglect, violence Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007;23(7):482–5.
and abuse. J Inj Violence Res. 2011;3(2):98–110. 39. AlJasser M, Al-Khenaizan S. Cutaneous mimickers of
22. Stratman E, Melski J. Scald abuse. Arch Dermatol. child abuse: a primer for pediatricians. Eur J Pediatr.
2002;138(3):318–20. 2008;167(11):1221–30. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
23. Maguire S, Moynihan S, Mann M, Potokar T, Kemp 40. Oates RK. Overturning the diagnosis of child abuse.
AM. A systematic review of the features that indicate Arch Dis Child. 1984;59(7):665–6.
13 Dermatological Emergencies: Skin Manifestations of Abuse 257
41. Leung AK, Robson WL. Superimposed Mongolian therapeutic purposes. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2006;
spots. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25(2):233–5. 97(3):212–4.
42. Barzilai A, Choen HA. Isolation of group A strepto- 47. Asnes RS, Wisotsky DH. Cupping lesions simulating
cocci from children with perianal cellulitis and from child abuse. J Pediatr. 1981;99(2):267–8.
their siblings. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17:358–60. 48. Look KM, Look RM. Skin scraping, cupping, and
43. Duhra P, Ilchyshyn A. Perianal streptococcal cellulitis moxibustion that may mimic physical abuse. J
with penile involvement. Br J Dermatol. Forensic Sci. 1997;42(1):103–5. Review.
1990;123(6):793–6. 49. Wong HC, Wong JK, Wong NY. Signs of physical
44. Byard RW, Donald TG, Rutty GN. Non-traumatic abuse or evidence of moxibustion, cupping or coin-
causes of perianal hemorrhage and excoriation in the ing? CMAJ. 1999;160(6):785–6.
young. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2008;4(3):159–63. 50. Ravanfar P, Dinulos JG. Curr Opin Pediatr. Cultural
Epub 2008 Jan 9. practices affecting the skin of children. 2010;22(4):
45. Berth-Jones J, Graham-Brown RA, Burns DA. Lichen 423–31. Review.
sclerosus et atrophicus—a review of 15 cases in young 51. Morris R, Usatine R. An unusual pattern of bruising.
girls. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1991;16(1):14–7. West J Med. 2000;172(5):298.
46. Mataix J, Belinchón I, Bañuls J, Pastor N, Betlloch I. 52. Dumaret AC, Tursz A. Long-term consequences of
Skin lesions from the application of suction cups for child abuse and neglect. Rev Prat. 2011;61(5):663–6.
Dermatologic Surgery
Complications 14
Amylynne J. Frankel and Ellen S. Marmur
sensitivity regarding patients’ expectations and beyond the area of a hematoma, as in dependent
emotions. For example, bruising, which is an areas or areas inferior to a surgical site, such as a
accepted side effect in many procedures, is stress- wound on a cheek with an ecchymosis that
ful for patients. Dermatologic surgeons should be extends around the jaw and submentally, or a
readily available for follow-up appointments if wound on the forehead with periorbital bruising.
only to offer reassurance while minor side effects Ecchymoses resolve after 5–14 days depending
and complications are resolving. When major on the location. In contrast, a hematoma resolves
side effects occur, the ability to discuss the poten- much more slowly and often confers an increased
tial cause and the management plan with the risk of infection. The most common factor lead-
patient, while accepting appropriate responsibil- ing to hematomas in patients presenting for der-
ity for that complication, is essential for success- matologic surgery is concurrent anticoagulation
ful management of dermatologic surgical therapy. Of the many types of anticoagulants, it is
complications. often aspirin, ibuprofen, or clopidogrel that con-
Four of the most common complications in tribute to increased risk of hemorrhage more than
dermatologic surgery include hemorrhage, infec- warfarin.
tion, dehiscence, and necrosis of the skin. Each Assessing potential bleeding risk includes a
of these will be discussed below. thorough history of significant bleeding during
prior low-risk surgical or dental procedures, com-
mon medical problems such as hypertension,
14.3 Hemorrhage alcoholism, and anxiety, and known medical con-
ditions that contribute to abnormal coagulation,
Even the most skilled surgeon will encounter such as liver disease, renal dysfunction, and
bleeding at some point in his or her practice. To malignancies [2]. Finally, it is imperative to
minimize the clinical sequelae of excessive bleed- obtain a medication history that includes medica-
ing, the astute surgeon anticipates the potential tions the patient takes both daily and as needed,
difficulties and recognizes and manages prob- as well as the last date the patient may have taken
lems as they arise. However, much of the battle is each of these medications. Several common over
to be won off of the operating table with a thor- the counter medications may have anticoagula-
ough preoperative assessment, familiarization tion effects, including Alka-Seltzer, which con-
with current guidelines for withholding blood tains aspirin, and Advil Cold and Sinus, which
thinners, knowledge of management of delayed contains ibuprofen. Gingko biloba, garlic, gin-
bleeding, and excellent pressure bandaging for seng, ginger, feverfew, vitamin E, and saw pal-
the postoperative period of time [1]. metto have all been implicated in increased
Beyond excessive bleeding intra-operatively, operative and postoperative bleeding. Many stud-
postoperative bleeding can be both distressing for ies suggest waiting 3 days after the last dose of
the patient and have the potential for hematoma aspirin to reduce the risk of bleeding. However,
formation. A hematoma is a localized collection the life span of a platelet is 12 days, the half life
of blood outside of the blood vessel, usually in is 6 days, and one baby aspirin (81 mg) effects all
liquid form in the tissue. It appears as a deep pur- of the platelets in circulation. Therefore, 1 week
ple, grape jelly-like nodule in or adjacent to the is the ideal time to request patients avoid non-
area of surgery. One common area for a hema- medically necessary supplements or anticoagu-
toma is the infraorbital space occurring after sur- lants. Excessive bleeding secondary to acquired
gery near or trauma to the infraorbital vessels. abnormalities in coagulation or platelet function
Another is the leg where superficial vessels may from medications or ingested substances is sur-
bleed or clot. A hematoma differs from an ecchy- prisingly common (Table 14.1). For example,
mosis, or a bruise, which is due to the spread of alcohol decreases vasoconstriction and impairs
blood under the skin—usually throughout the coagulation of platelets. Furthermore, various
fat—in a thin layer. An ecchymosis may extend dietary supplements and alternative medicines
14 Dermatologic Surgery Complications 261
Table 14.3 AHA guidelines for preventative antibiotics gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts. For legs
prior to certain dental procedures with granulating wounds, common causes of
Artificial heart valves postoperative infections are from E. coli from
History of infective endocarditis above. For this reason, this author instructs all
Cardiac transplant with known heart valve problem patients to use Hibiclens surgical scrub from the
Congenital heart conditions: groin down. Pseudomonas species are a common
• Unrepaired or incompletely repaired cyanotic
congenital heart disease, including those with
pathogen of the external ear. If the patient has
palliative shunts and conduits chondritis of the ears postoperatively, it may not
• A completely repaired congenital heart defect with be a true infection. However, patients are often
prosthetic material or device during the first 6 put on ciprofloxin 500 mg by mouth twice a day
months after the procedure
• Any repaired congenital heart defect with residual
for 7 days to cover for Pseudomonas. Additionally,
defect at the site or adjacent to the site of a any time a patient has a laser procedure, photody-
prosthetic patch or a prosthetic device namic therapy or surgical procedure around the
lips, it is important to get a full history of herpes
infections—ask about fever blisters—and insti-
Despite the potential for SSI, antimicrobial tute prophylaxis with acyclovir or a related medi-
prophylaxis is rarely appropriate for dermato- cation. This author uses Famvir 500 mg by mouth
logic surgery. Reported infection rates for Mohs twice daily for 3 days for anyone with a history of
micrographic surgery (MMS) range from less HSV, or for anyone receiving ablative procedures
than 0.7–3.5% and occur most frequently on such as CO2 laser resurfacing.
the legs [17, 18]. Dermatologic procedures sel- As mentioned in Table 14.2, dermatologic sur-
dom cause bacteremia, and they have been gery is not considered in the AHA guidelines for
implicated in only an extremely small fraction endocarditis prophylaxis [22]. In one review, the
of cases of endocarditis or infections of vascu- authors did not recommend routine prophylaxis
lar grafts or orthopedic prostheses. According for high-risk patients undergoing procedures of
to the newest guidelines, systemic prophylactic less than 20 min duration on intact skin
antibiotics are rarely indicated in patients (Table 14.3). Patients at high risk for endocarditis
undergoing dermatologic surgery, even those should receive prophylaxis in cases where there
who would otherwise require prophylaxis for is infected skin, breach of oral mucosa, or nonin-
dental procedures (Table 14.3). Because wound fected site at high risk for SSI [23]. This prophy-
infections following dermatologic surgery are laxis should be administered 30–60 min prior to
uncommon, usually mild, and generally easily performing the procedure to allow the antibiotic
treatable, systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis is to be present in the blood at the time of the initial
not indicated to prevent postoperative wound incision [24]. Appropriate specialists should be
infections either. Topical antibiotic ointments consulted—and documented for each procedure
for that purpose are also ineffective, yet often performed on patients with orthopedic prosthe-
used regardless [19]. ses, those with ventriculoatrial and peritoneal
Although the overall trend in the literature shunts, and in any case where the surgeon is not
supports decreased use of antimicrobials in der- comfortable making the decision alone. A 2008
matologic surgery as a whole, it is important to advisory statement on antibiotic prophylaxis is
know which situations still warrant antibiotics the most recent and widely used reference algo-
[20]. Patients at high risk for wound infection rithm for dermatologic surgeons [25].
should receive prophylactic antibiotics chosen to Clinical Pearl: Three main factors are essen-
cover the organism most likely to cause infection tial in the decision making process regarding
[21]. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common antibiotic prophylaxis.
agent of skin wound infections. However, • How contaminated is the wound (or will it be)?
Streptococcus viridans is commonly found in • Where is the lesion located and what kind of
oral flora, and Escherichia coli is present near the procedure is intended?
14 Dermatologic Surgery Complications 265
• Is the patient among the highest risk group for one pack per day. When necrosis does occur, the
endocarditis? area involved tends to be greater in smokers com-
Infection control measures including active pared to those who have never smoked. Stopping
surveillance of SSI, implementation of a protocol or decreasing smoking for at least 2 days prior to
for dealing with SSI, compliance observations surgery and for at least 1 week postoperatively
and instruction/training of healthcare workers, can potentially reverse some of the negative
clipping surrounding hair instead of shaving, effects of smoking on the microvasculature [28].
and following the often-times confusing periop- When necrosis occurs, treatment is conserva-
erative antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines are tive. Except in cases of hematoma formation and
essential measures in the prevention of SSI. infection, the full extent of the necrosis should be
Though preoperative MRSA screening and allowed to manifest. Debriding the wound prior to
implementation of a decontamination protocol this may injure viable tissue [27]. When the eschar
appears to decrease postoperative MRSA wound is freely separable from the wound bed, careful
infections after Mohs surgery, the clinical and sharp debridement may be performed, and the
efficacy and cost effectiveness of this screening wound may be allowed to granulate. Necrotic
has yet to be determined [26]. Finally, infection wounds are at higher risk for infection and the
control includes safety of the surgical team from surgeon should observe the affected area carefully
exposure to HIV or Hepatitis C virus. Vigilant and frequently, and consider systemic antibiotics.
infection control for both the patient and the
team is critical to surgical safety.
14.6 Dehiscence
or antivirals, depending on the etiology. The most Given that hyperbaric oxygen has proven
concerning complication is necrosis [33]. successful in healing of nasal tip grafting in cases
The risk of skin necrosis following injection of cancer or trauma reconstruction, this author
of filler is increased in certain potential danger suggests administration of oxygen via nasal can-
zones, including the glabella, nasal skin, temple, nula, face-mask or in the form of hyperbaric oxy-
alar groove, and even the lip [34, 35]. The most gen for ischemia secondary to cosmetic filler
common of area for filler-related necrosis is the injection [43, 44]. For cases with severe, unremit-
glabella. Major facial vessels of concern during ting swelling, oral antihistamines may also be
soft tissue augmentation are the superior and employed. Finally, treatment with low molecular
inferior labial arteries, both branching off the weight heparin (5,000 IE daily) has been reported
facial artery at the angle of the mouth; the angu- to treat impending necrosis after hyaluronic acid
lar artery, the terminal branch of the facial injection in the treatment of frown lines of the
artery; the lateral nasal artery, branch of the glabella due to occlusion or compression of the
angular artery; the dorsal nasal artery, which supratrochlear vessels [45].
forms an anastomosis with the angular artery;
the supratrochlear artery, one of the terminal
branches of the ophthalmic artery; and the 14.7.3 Botox Emergencies
superficial temporal artery, arising from the
external carotid artery [36]. There are many neurotoxins approved by the
Several treatment algorithms for impending FDA in use today. Botox acts via prevention of
facial necrosis due to filler injection have been the release of acetylcholine at the presynaptic
proposed in the literature [37–41]. If tissue nerve terminal, thereby stopping the electrical
blanching is observed, injection should be impulse and blocking muscular movement.
stopped immediately. Warm gauze (to facilitate Complications of botox include
vasodilation) and tapping (to potentially break up • Overcorrection
product) are then recommended. If the filler was • Undercorrection
an HA, immediate injection of hyaluronidase • Asymmetric result
should be used. The authors recommend injec- • Upper eyelid ptosis
tion of a 1:1 volume of hyaluronidase to HA in • Dysphagia
the zone of ischemia or necroses. Typically, a • Neck weakness
range of 8–16 mL vitrase 0.5 mL of HA will dis- • Perioral droop
solve the cosmetically imperfect swelling. For • Bruising
emergency situations when occlusion or ischemia • Headache
is suspected, use more. No absolute maximum • Intravascular injection
dose has been published but this author has used • Globe perforation
50 mL hyaluronidase in the area of the alar crease • Diplopia
to correct a 0.2 mL compression induced isch- Particularly distressing can be true eyelid pto-
emia of the ipsilateral ala. Per the literature, it is sis, which occurs when botox is injected or dif-
exceedingly rare to dissolve native HA with fuses into the levator palpebrae superiorus
hyaluronidase. Immediate use of nitroglycerin muscle. Though temporary, this effect can be dis-
paste to facilitate vascular dilatation and blood tressing for the patient and can impact their qual-
flow to the area should be applied [42]. ity of life. To avoid this complication, all
Additionally, anticoagulants such as aspirin and injections should be at least 1 cm above the bony
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, as well as orbital rim. If this complication occurs, iopidine
vitamins that inhibit platelet aggregation, should (apraclonidine) 0.5% drops may be used to stim-
be encouraged in any protocol to treat cutaneous ulate Muller’s muscle, providing some lid open-
tissue ischemia. ing to partially alleviate the ptosis [46].
268 A.J. Frankel and E.S. Marmur
Similar to those complications encountered tions, cardiac monitoring during the procedure
with laser treatment, the adverse effects of Botox and in the immediate recovery period, as well as
can be distressing to the patient, but few, if any, pausing treatment for 15 min between each cos-
represent a true emergency. metic unit is recommended. Regarding laryngeal
edema, heavy smokers seem to be most at risk for
this rare but serious complication.
14.7.4 Chemical Peel Emergencies One very real emergency of any chemical peel
is a burn of the eye from an accidental splash.
Common chemical peel side effects include sting- Cover the eyes with proper protection such as
ing, redness, and desquamation of the skin. These tape or stickers. Arrange the procedure tray to
side effects should be expected by any patient avoid accidental spillage; always label of the peel
who undergoes a chemical peel, as the mecha- container to ensure the proper product, and place
nism of the peel is controlled skin injury in an the original bottle on the counter as opposed to
attempt to remodel the epidermis [30, 47]. the Mayo stand, where it can more easily spill.
Chemical peels can target the superficial, medium Additionally, a clearly marked eye wash station is
or deep layers of the epidermis, depending on the essential should a splash occur. Furthermore,
type of chemical used and the desired outcome. immediate evaluation by an ophthalmologist or
Other complications of peels include contact der- transfer to the emergency department is war-
matitis, milia formation, infection, acne or rosa- ranted should an accident occur.
cea flare, and pigmentary changes [30]. It is Clinical Pearl: To avoid complications of
important to discuss the common side effects chemical peels:
prior to performing the procedure on any patient. • Take a good medication history, including use
Additionally, certain medications may potentiate of cosmeceuticals, retinoids, and glycolics, as
the effects of the peel and are thus necessary to be well as a history of previous chemical peels or
aware of prior to performing the procedure. contact dermatitis.
The most superficial chemical peels include • Consider performing a small patch test prior
alpha-hydroxy acids (AHA), such as glycolic to the procedure.
acid, and these peels are associated with minimal
side effects. The two major side effects of AHA
peels are irritation and sun sensitivity, which are 14.8 Conclusion
transient. Medium depth peels include trichloroa-
cetic acids (TCA). Side effects are similar to Dermatologic surgery is an art that involves
AHA peels but last longer. The deepest peels complex procedures involving excisions, repairs,
include phenols, and can be painful requiring injections, and devices. Thorough understand-
local anesthetic or sedation. Healing time is lon- ing of the anatomy and pathophysiology of the
ger—usually 2–3 weeks—and the most consis- skin, proper patient evaluation, appropriate
tent side effect is pigmentary alteration (hypo- or selection of procedures based on each patient,
hyperpigmentation). Other serious side effects of and divulging potential complications of each
phenol include scarring, infection, as well as rare procedure are essential to achieving optimal
cardiac arrhythmias and temporary laryngeal results and minimizing complications in cutane-
edema [30]. Patients who have impaired liver or ous procedures [30].
kidney function are most at risk of phenol toxic-
ity, as phenol is absorbed through the skin and
subsequently metabolized by the liver and
excreted by the kidneys. In addition, the size of
References
the treatment areas, rather than the concentration 1. Hurst EA, Yu SS, Grekin RC, Neuhaus IM. Bleeding
of the phenol, determines the extent of cutaneous complications in dermatologic surgery. MD Semin
absorption. To minimize these serious complica- Cutan Med Surg. 2007;26:40–6.
14 Dermatologic Surgery Complications 269
2. Bunick CG, Aasi SZ. Hemorrhagic complications in 18. Hurst EA, Grekin RC, Yu SS, Neuhaus IM. Infectious
dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Ther. 2011;24:537–50. complications and antibiotic use in dermatologic sur-
3. Dinehart SM, Henry L. Dietary supplements: altered gery. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2007;26(1):47–53.
coagulation and effects on bruising. Dermatol Surg. 19. Hirschmann JV. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in derma-
2005;31:819–26. tologic surgery. Cutis. 2007;79(6 Suppl):43–51.
4. Billingsley EM, Maloney ME. Intraoperative and 20. Shurman DL, Benedetto AV. Antimicrobials in der-
postoperative bleeding problems in patients taking matologic surgery: facts and controversies. Clin
warfarin, aspirin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory Dermatol. 2010;28(5):505–10.
agents. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:381–5. 21. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1128404-
5. Alcalay J, Alkalay R. Controversies in perioperative overview Accessed 11 Mar 2012.
management of blood thinners in dermatologic sur- 22. [Guideline] Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, et al.
gery: continue or discontinue? Dermatol Surg. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from
2004;30:1091–4. the American Heart Association: a guideline from the
6. Alcalay J. Cutaneous surgery in patients receiving American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever,
warfarin therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:756–8. Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee,
7. Otley CC, Fewkes JL, Frank W, et al. Complications Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and
of cutaneous surgery in patients who are taking warfa- the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on
rin, aspirin, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the
Arch Dermatol. 1996;132:161–6. Quality of Care and Outcomes Research
8. Lam J, Lim J, Clark J, et al. Warfarin and cutaneous Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation
surgery: a preliminary prospective study. Br J Plast 2007;116(15):1736–54.
Surg. 2001;52:372–3. 23. Saleh K, Sonesson A, Persson B, Riesbeck K,
9. Bartlett GR. Does aspirin affect the outcome of minor Schmidtchen A. A descriptive study of bacterial load
cutaneous surgery? Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:214–6. of full-thickness surgical wounds in dermatologic sur-
10. Kovich O, Oltey CC. Thrombotic complications gery. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(7):1014–22.
related to discontinuation of warfarin and aspirin ther- 24. Wood L, Warner N, Billingsley E. Infectious compli-
apy perioperatively for cutaneous operation. J Am cations of dermatologic procedures. Dermatol Ther.
Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:233–7. 2011;24:558–70.
11. Alam M, Goldberg LH. Serious adverse vascular 25. Wright TI, Baddour LM, Berbari EF, et al. Antibiotic
events associated with perioperative interruption of prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: advisory state-
antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Dermatol Surg. ment 2008. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(3):
2002;28:992–8. 464–73.
12. Schanbacher CF, Bennett RG. Postoperative stroke 26. Cordova KB, Grenier N, Chang KH, Dufresne Jr R.
after stopping warfarin for cutaneous surgery. Preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:785–9. aureus screening in Mohs surgery appears to decrease
13. Kovich O, Otley CC. Perioperative management of postoperative infections. Dermatol Surg.
anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors for cutaneous 2010;36(10):1537–40.
surgery: a survey of current practice. Dermatol Surg. 27. Delaney A, Diamantis S, Marks V. Complications of
2002;28:513–7. tissue ischemia in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol
14. Kirkorian AY, Moore BL, Siskind J, Marmur ES. Ther. 2011;24:551–7.
Perioperative management of anticoagulant therapy 28. Lawrence WT, Murphy RC, Robson MC, Heggers JP.
during cutaneous surgery: 2005 survey of Mohs sur- The detrimental effect of cigarette smoking on flap
geons. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(10):1189–97. survival: an experimental study in the rat. Br J Plast
15. Bordeaux JS, Martires KJ, Goldberg D, Pattee SF, Fu Surg. 1984;37(2):216–9.
P, Maloney ME. Prospective evaluation of dermato- 29. Khachemoune A, Kreici-Papa N, Finn DT, Rogers
logic surgery complications including patients on GS. Dehisced clean wound: resuture it or steri-strip it?
multiple antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications. J Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(3):431–2.
Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(3):576–83. Epub 2011 30. Zhang AY, Obagi S. Diagnosis and management of
Jul 22. skin resurfacing—related complications. Oral
16. Saleh K, Sonesson A, Persson B, Riesbeck K, Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 2009;21:1–12.
Schmidtchen A. A descriptive study of bacterial 31. Alam M, Warycha M. Complications of lasers and
load of full-thickness surgical wounds in dermato- light treatments. Dermatol Ther. 2011;24:571–80.
logic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(7):1014–22. 32. Batra RS, Jacob CI, Hobbs L, Arndt KA, Dover JS. A
doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02040.x. Epub 2011 prospective survey of patient experiences after laser
May 25. skin resurfacting: results from 2 ½ years of follow-up.
17. Martin JE, Speyer LA, Schmults CD. Heightened Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1295–9.
infection-control practices are associated with 33. Cohen JL. Understanding, avoiding, and managing
significantly lower infection rates in office-based dermal filler complications. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34
Mohs surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(10):1529–36. Suppl 1:S9209.
270 A.J. Frankel and E.S. Marmur
34. Grunebaum LD, Allemann IB, Dayan S, et al. The (CaHA) mixed with lidocaine and CaHA alone for
risk of alar necrosis associated with dermal filler correction of nasolabial fold wrinkles. Dermatol Surg.
injection. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:1635–40. 2008;36:760–5.
35. Winslow C. The management of dermal filler compli- 42. Sclafani A, Fagien S. Treatment of injectable soft
cations. Facial Plast Surg. 2009;25(2):124–8. tissue filler complications. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:
36. Bolognia J, Jorizzo J, Rapini R (eds) Dermatology, 1672–80.
2nd ed. Mosby, 2007. 43. Nichter LS, Morwood DT, Williams GS, Spence RJ.
37. Bailey SH, Cohen JL, Kenkel JM. Etiology, preven- Expanding the limits of composite grafting: a case report
tion and treatment of dermal filler complications. of successful nose replantation assisted by hyperbaric
Aesthetic Surg J. 2011;31:110–21. oxygen. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:337–40.
38. Cohen JL. Understanding, avoiding and managing 44. Rapley JH, Lawrence WT, Witt PD. Composite graft-
dermal filler complications. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34: ing and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in pediatric nasal
s92–9. tip reconstruction after avulsive dog bite injury. Am
39. Cohen JL, Brown MR. Anatomic considerations for Plast Surg. 2001;46:434–8.
soft tissue augmentation of the face. J Drugs Dermatol. 45. Sanchz S, Schippert W, Ulmer A, et al. Arterial embo-
2009;8:13–6. lization caused by injection of hyaluronic acid
40. Glaich D, Cohen J, Goldberg L. Injection necrosis of (Restylane). Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:928–9.
the glabella: protocol for prevention and treatment after 46. Niamtu J. Complications in fillers and botox. Oral
use of dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:276–81. Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 2009;21:13–21.
41. Grunebaum LD, Elsaie ML, Kaufman JY. Six-month, 47. Khunger N, IADVL Task Force. Standard guidelines
double-blind, randomized, split-face study to compare of care for chemical peels. Indian J Dermatol Venereol
the efficacy and safety of calcium hydroxylapatite Leprol. 2008;74(Suppl):S5–12.
Bites and Stings
15
Annemarie Uliasz
stings. Reactions limited to the skin may be the diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Immediate intra-
symptomatically treated with cold compresses, muscular epinephrine is the initial acute treat-
antihistamines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ment and patients should be discharged with a
drugs, and high potency topical corticosteroids. prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector and
Oral corticosteroids may be required for large clear instructions for use as well as an allergy
local reactions and immunotherapy may be con- identification bracelet. Additionally, all patients
sidered to reduce the risk of future stings. with systemic reactions should be referred to an
Toxic systemic reactions to vespids may result allergist for skin prick or serum immunoassays to
when a large number of stings is sustained. confirm venom-specific IgE [4] as well as venom
Although clinically similar to an allergic reac- immunotherapy which is available for both hon-
tion, toxic systemic reactions due to multiple eybee and vespid allergies. Venom immunother-
stings are caused by the vasoactive constituents apy is highly effective and has been demonstrated
of the venom rather than an allergic mechanism, to lower the risk of a subsequent systemic allergic
and radioallergosorbent testing, which detects reaction from 30 to 60% to less than 5% [5–11].
allergen-specific IgE antibodies in the serum sug-
gesting an allergic reaction, is recommended to
distinguish the etiology. 15.2.3 Formicidae
Anaphylaxis, a type I IgE-mediated hypersen-
sitivity reaction, is estimated to occur in 1.5–34% Imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta and
of patients sustaining an insect sting [3]. Those at Solenopsis richteri) are believed to have been
increased risk for severe systemic reactions imported from South America via ship to Mobile,
include those with increased age, prior venom Alabama in the 1950s with subsequent spread
sensitization, underlying cardiovascular disease, throughout the southern USA. They are also
and patients with mastocytosis. Symptoms of found in regions of Mexico, the Caribbean,
anaphylaxis may occur as early as 10 min or as New Zealand, Australia, Taiwan, and China [12].
late as 72 h after the sting. Early signs and symp- In endemic areas, they are the leading cause of
toms include generalized urticaria, angioedema, hymenoptera hypersensitivity reactions [13].
and flushing, and may progress to bronchocon- Fire ants are notoriously difficult to avoid. In fact,
striction, laryngeal edema manifesting as wheez- one study revealed that more than 50% of people
ing, hypotension, cardiovascular collapse, and, fall victim to the sting of this aggressive crea-
potentially, death. Elevated concentrations of ture within 3 weeks of moving to an endemic
serum histamine, tryptase, and mast cells support area [14].
15 Bites and Stings 273
diaphoresis, agitation, hypertension, and muscle the following weeks, a thick eschar gradually
cramping [23, 24]. Abdominal rigidity may forms and then falls off to reveal a necrotic ulcer.
mimic an acute abdomen. In rare cases, myositis A small minority of patients may experience
[25, 26], priaprism [27], respiratory arrest, and systemic reactions including hemolysis, renal
death may occur. failure, and disseminated intravascular coagula-
Treatment includes local wound care, ice, ele- tion [35–37].
vation, and immobilization. Tetanus prophylaxis Treatment includes cleaning the wound,
should be given following all envenoming spider compression, ice, elevation, analgesics, and
bites as Clostridium tetani spores and bacteria are tetanus prophylaxis. The use of dapsone has
commonly found throughout the environment been demonstrated to be ineffective [38].
and may gain entrance to the body via abrasions Furthermore, it carries the risk of methemoglo-
and wounds [28]. Muscle relaxants and analge- binemia, and in those who are glucose-6-phos-
sics are often used for black widow bites. Equine- phate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient severe
derived antivenom may be employed for severe hemolysis may occur due to oxidative denatur-
systemic cases; however, symptoms may subside ation of hemoglobin which G6PD normally
spontaneously within hours to days. Furthermore, prevents. Early excision and intralesional corti-
antivenin has been associated with immediate costeroids are contraindicated as these mea-
hypersensitivity reactions anaphylaxis, and may sures may result in more tissue damage than
produce serum sickness 1–2 weeks following conservative treatment. Healing may take sev-
administration in up to 75% of patients [29, 30]. eral weeks to occur and excision and grafting
Its use is recommended in those cases involving may be considered for chronic ulcers 6–8 weeks
patients with marked systemic symptoms unre- after the initial injury [28, 39].
sponsive to other measures. It should be used Internationally, the Australian funnel web
only in locations where anaphylaxis may be ade- spider (Atrax and Hadronyche spp.) is consid-
quately treated [31, 32]. ered the most lethal spider in the world. It resides
The brown recluse spider (Loxosceles spp.) is in southeastern and coastal Australia. Although
found in North and South America. In the USA, cases of envenomation are rare, the Australian
the brown recluse predominantly inhabits the funnel spider bite remains a relevant medical
south central USA. It is identified by its brown entity given its life-threatening nature and the
color, and in females, a characteristic darker availability of an effective antivenom. The spi-
brown violin-shaped marking on the dorsal ders are large (4 cm long) and aggressive. The
cephalothorax. The bite of the brown recluse bite of the Australian funnel spider is remarkable
may result in necrotic skin lesions due to venom for visible puncture wounds created by long,
containing sphingomyelinase D and hyaluroni- sturdy fangs up to 5 mm in length capable of
dase [33, 34]. The platelet aggregation, derma- piercing fingernails. Cases of mild envenoma-
tonecrosis, and hemolysis caused by tion with its venom, the neurotoxin d-atraco-
sphingomyelinase D is felt to result in cutaneous toxin, may yield local paresthesias, numbness,
ulceration and systemic effects. Hyaluronidase and spasms while severe envenomation results in
may increase the spread of the lesion. The bite autonomic and neuromuscular excitability with
itself may go unnoticed and commonly occurs initial hypertension, tachycardia, diaphoresis,
when the spider is trapped between bedsheets or and nausea progressing to bradycardia, hypoten-
clothing and the skin of the victim. The majority sion, respiratory edema, and in some cases,
of cases are self-limited with mild erythema and coma. Deaths have been reported to occur within
edema and heal spontaneously without support- 15 min in children [39]. Treatment consists of
ive care. In cases of dermatonecrotic loxos- application of a pressure immobilization dress-
celism, initially, a dark macule with surrounding ing until the administration of antivenom, a
erythema may appear, progressing within hours purified IgG derived from rabbits hyperimmu-
to cyanosis with a central vesicle or bulla. During nized with Atrax venom.
276 A. Uliasz
15.3.3 Centipedes
15.4 Snakes
11. Carballada F, et al. Follow-up of venom immunother- 31. Moss HS, Binder LS. A retrospective review of black
apy (VIT) based on conventional techniques and mon- widow spider envenomation. Ann Emerg Med.
itoring of immunoglobulin E to individual venom 1987;16:188–91.
allergens. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2010; 32. Clark R, Wethern-Kestner S, Vance MV, et al. Clinical
20(6):506–13. presentation and treatment of black widow spider
12. Ascunce MS, et al. Global invasion history of the fire envenomation: a review of 163 cases. Ann Emerg
ant Solenopsis invicta. Science. Med. 1992;21:782–7.
2011;331(6020):1066–8. 33. Campbell BJ, Forrester LJ, Barrett TJ. Direct lysis of
13. Caplan EL, et al. Fire ants represent an important risk red blood cells by the venom of Loxosceles reclusa.
for anaphylaxis among residents of an endemic region. Fed Proc. 1977;36:669.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(6):1274–7. 34. Forrester LJ, Barrett JT, Campbell BJ. Red blood cell
14. Tracy JM, et al. The natural history of exposure to the lysis induced by venom of the Brown Recluse spider;
imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta). J Allergy Clin the role of sphingomyelinase-D. Arch Biochem
Immunol. 1995;95(4):824–8. Biophys. 1978;187:335.
15. Mlot NJ, Tovey CA, Hu DL. Fire ants self-assemble 35. Vorse H, Seccareccio P, Woodruff K, Humphrey GB.
into waterproof rafts to survive floods. Proc Natl Acad Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy following
Sci U S A. 2011;108(19):7669–73. fatal brown recluse spider bite (necrotic arachnidism).
16. deShazo RD, et al. Fire ant attacks on patients in nurs- J Pediatr. 1972;80:1035–7.
ing homes: an increasing problem. Am J Med. 36. Elbahlawan LM, Stidham GL, Bugnitz MC, Storgion
2004;116(12):843–6. SA, Quasney MW. Severe systemic reaction to
17. Hoffman DR. Ant venoms. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Loxosceles reclusa spider bites in a pediatric popula-
Immunol. 2010;10(4):342–6. tion. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005;21(3):177–80.
18. deShazo RD, Butcher BT, Banks WA. Reactions to 37. Elston DM. Systemic manifestations and treatment of
the stings of the imported fire ant. N Engl J Med. brown recluse spider bites. Cutis. 2004;74(6):336.
1990;323(7):462–6. 338, 340.
19. Triplett RF. The imported fire ant: health hazard or 38. Elston DM, Miller S, Young III RJ, Eggers J,
nuisance? South Med J. 1976;69(3):258–9. McGlasson D, et al. Comparison of colchicine, dap-
20. Stablein JJ, Lockey RF. Adverse reactions to ant sone, triamcinolone, and diphenhydramine therapy
stings. Clin Rev Allergy. 1987;5(2):161–75. for the treatment of brown recluse spider envenoma-
21. Dietrich JJ, et al. Imported fire ant hypersensitivity: a tions: a double-blind, controlled study in a rabbit
1-day rush immunotherapy schedule without premed- model. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:595–97.
ication. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009;103(6): 39. Saucier J. Arachnid envenomation. Emerg Med Clin
535–6. North Am. 2004;22(2):405–22.
22. Diaz J. The global epidemiology, syndromic 40. Bucaretchi F, Deus Reinaldo C, Hyslop S, Madureira
classification, management, and prevention of spider PR, De-Capitani EM, Vieira RJ. A clinico-epidemio-
bites. Am J Trop Med. 2004;71(2):239–50. logical study of bites by spiders of the genus Phoneutria.
23. Sudhof T. The global epidemiology, syndromic Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2000;42:17–21.
classification, management, and prevention of spider 41. Vetter RS, Isbister GK. Medical aspects of spider
bites. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:933–62. bites. Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:409–29.
24. Henkel AW, Sankaranarayanan S. Mechanisms of 42. Chippaux JP, Goyffon M. Epidemiology of scorpi-
alpha-latrotoxin action. Cell Tissue Res. onism: a global appraisal. Acta Trop. 2008;107(2):
1999;2(296):229–33. 71–9.
25. Kose A, Bozkurt S, Lok U, Zenginol M, Yildirim C, 43. Holve S. Venomous spiders, snakes, and scorpions in
Gunay N, Kose B. Presumptive Latrodectus bite with the United States. Pediatr Ann. 2009;38(4):210–7.
ileus and myocardial involvement. Wilderness Environ 44. West PL, Hendrickson RG. Scorpions on a plane? A
Med. 2010;21(3):271–2. case series of non-endemic scorpion envenomations. J
26. Sari I, Zengin S, Davutoglu V, Yildirim C, Gunay N. Emerg Med. 2011;41(1):89.
Myocarditis after black widow spider envenomation. 45. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Utility of scorpion anti-
Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(5):630. venin vs prazosin in the management of severe
27. Quan D, Ruha A. Priapism associated with Latrodectus Mesobuthus tamulus (Indian red scorpion) envenom-
mactans envenomation. Am J Emerg Med. 2009; ing at rural setting. J Assoc Physicians India. 2007;
27(6):759. 55:14–21.
28. Sams HH, Dunnick C, Smith ML, King Jr LE. 46. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH. Efficacy and safety of
Necrotic arachnidism. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001; scorpion antivenom plus prazosin compared with pra-
44:561–73. zosin alone for venomous scorpion (Mesobuthus tam-
29. Rf C. The safety and efficacy of antivenin Latrodectus ulus) sting: randomised open label clinical trial. BMJ.
mactans. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2001;39:119–23. 2011;342:c7136.
30. O’Malley GF, Dart R, Kuffner EF. Successful treat- 47. Undheim EA, King GF. On the venom system of cen-
ment of lactrodectism with antivenin after 90 hours. N tipedes (Chilopoda), a neglected group of venomous
Eng J Med. 1999;340:657. animals. Toxicon. 2011;57(4):512–24.
15 Bites and Stings 285
48. Fung HT, Lam SK, Wong OF. Centipede bite victims: 67. Norris RL, Pfalzgraf RR, Laing G. Death following
a review of patients presenting to two emergency coral snake bite in the United States–first documented
departments in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. case (with ELISA confirmation of envenomation) in
2011;17(5):381–5. over 40 years. Toxicon. 2009;53(6):693–7.
49. Yildiz A, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in a young 68. Tibballs J. Australian venomous jellyfish, envenoma-
man caused by centipede sting. Emerg Med J. tion syndromes, toxins and therapy. Toxicon.
2006;23(4):e30. 2006;48:830–56.
50. Hasan S, Hassan K. Proteinuria associated with centi- 69. Menahem S, Shvartzman P. Recurrent dermatitis from
pede bite. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005;20(4):550–1. jellyfish envenomation. Can Fam Physician. 1994;40:
51. Logan JL, Ogden DA. Rhabdomyolysis and acute 2116–8.
renal failure following the bite of the giant desert cen- 70. Tamanaha RH, Izumi AK. Persistent cutaneous hyper-
tipede Scolopendra heros. West J Med. 1985;142(4): sensitivity reaction after a Hawaiian box jellyfish sting
549–50. (Carybdea alata). J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35(6):
52. Friedman IS, et al. Wells’ syndrome triggered by cen- 991–3.
tipede bite. Int J Dermatol. 1998;37(8):602–5. 71. Uri S, Marina G, Liubov G. Severe delayed cutaneous
53. Barnett PL. Centipede ingestion by a six-month-old reaction due to Mediterranean jellyfish (Rhopilema
infant: toxic side effects. Pediatr Emerg Care. nomadica) envenomation. Contact Dermatitis.
1991;7(4):229–30. 2005;52(5):282–3.
54. Chaou CH, et al. Comparisons of ice packs, hot water 72. Rallis E, Limas C. Recurrent dermatitis after solitary
immersion, and analgesia injection for the treatment envenomation by jellyfish partially responded to tac-
of centipede envenomations in Taiwan. Clin Toxicol rolimus ointment 0.1%. J Eur Acad Dermatol
(Phila). 2009;47(7):659–62. Venereol. 2007;21(9):1287–8.
55. Balit CR, et al. Prospective study of centipede bites 73. Di Costanzo L, et al. Successful management of a
in Australia. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(1): delayed and persistent cutaneous reaction to jellyfish
41–8. with pimecrolimus. J Dermatolog Treat. 2009;20(3):
56. Makarov SE, et al. Defensive secretions in three spe- 179–80.
cies of polydesmids (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, 74. Barnes JH. Cause and effect in Irukandji stingings.
Polydesmidae). J Chem Ecol. 2010;36(9):978–82. Med J Aust. 1964;1:897–904.
57. Radford AJ. Millipede burns in man. Trop Geogr 75. Nickson CP, et al. Irukandji syndrome case series
Med. 1975;27(3):279–87. from Australia’s Tropical Northern Territory. Ann
58. Shpall S, Frieden I. Mahogany discoloration of the Emerg Med. 2009;54(3):395–403.
skin due to the defensive secretion of a millipede. 76. Little M, Mulcahy RF, Wenck DJ. Life-threatening
Pediatr Dermatol. 1991;8(1):25–7. cardiac failure in a healthy young female with
59. Lima CA, et al. Exogenous pigmentation in toes Irukandji syndrome. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001;
feigning ischemia of the extremities: a diagnostic 29(2):178–80.
challenge brought by arthropods of the Diplopoda 77. Fenner PJ, Hadok JC. Fatal envenomation by jellyfish
Class (“millipedes”). An Bras Dermatol. 2010;85(3): causing Irukandji syndrome. Med J Aust. 2002;
391–2. 177(7):362–3.
60. De Capitani EM, et al. Human accidents involving 78. Pereira P, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage and death
Rhinocricus spp., a common millipede genus observed after envenoming by the jellyfish Carukia barnesi.
in urban areas of Brazil. Clin Toxicol (Phila). Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010;48(4):390–2.
2011;49(3):187–90. 79. Fenner PJ, Lippmann J, Gershwin LA. Fatal and non-
61. Gutierrez JM, et al. Snakebite envenoming from a fatal severe jellyfish stings in Thai waters. J Travel
global perspective: towards an integrated approach. Med. 2010;17(2):133–8.
Toxicon. 2010;56(7):1223–35. 80. Yoshimoto CM, Yanagihara AA. Cnidarian (coelen-
62. Bronstein AC, et al. 2010 Annual Report of the terate) envenomations in Hawai’i improve following
American Association of Poison Control Centers’ heat application. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;
National Poison Data System (NPDS): 28th Annual 96(3):300–3.
Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011;49(10):910–41. 81. Grady JD, Burnett JW. Irukandji-like syndrome in
63. Singletary EM, et al. Envenomations. Med Clin North South Florida divers. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(6):
Am. 2005;89(6):1195–224. 763–6.
64. Bush SP. Snakebite suction devices don’t remove 82. Yoshimoto CM. Jellyfish species distinction has
venom: they just suck. Ann Emerg Med. treatment implications. Am Fam Physician. 2006;
2004;43(2):187–8. 73(3):391.
65. Anz AW, et al. Management of venomous snakebite 83. Fenner PJ, et al. First aid treatment of jellyfish stings
injury to the extremities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. in Australia. Response to a newly differentiated spe-
2010;18(12):749–59. cies. Med J Aust. 1993;158(7):498–501.
66. Dart RC, McNally J. Efficacy, safety, and use of snake 84. Council AR. Guideline 9.4.5 envenomation: jellyfish
antivenoms in the United States. Ann Emerg Med. stings. 2010 March 2011. Available from: http://www.
2001;37(2):181–8. resus.org.au/.
286 A. Uliasz
85. Nomura JT, et al. A randomized paired comparison 93. Boer A, et al. Effective removal of sea-urchin spines
trial of cutaneous treatments for acute jellyfish by erbium: YAG laser ablation. Br J Dermatol.
(Carybdea alata) stings. Am J Emerg Med. 2002; 2001;145(1):169–70.
20(7):624–6. 94. Diaz JH. The evaluation, management, and preven-
86. Atkinson PR, et al. Is hot water immersion an effec- tion of stingray injuries in travelers. J Travel Med.
tive treatment for marine envenomation? Emerg Med 2008;15(2):102–9.
J. 2006;23(7):503–8. 95. Ikeda T. Supraventricular bigeminy following a sting-
87. Rossetto AL, de Macedo Mora J, Haddad Jr V. Sea ray envenomation: a case report. Hawaii Med J.
urchin granuloma. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1989;48(5):162. 164.
2006;48(5):303–6. 96. Parra MW, et al. Surviving a transfixing cardiac injury
88. Haddad Jr V, et al. Tropical dermatology: marine and caused by a stingray barb. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
aquatic dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009; 2010;139(5):e115–6.
61(5):733–50. quiz 751-2. 97. Fenner PJ, Williamson JA, Skinner RA. Fatal and
89. Ahmad R, et al. Sea urchin spine injuries of the hand. non-fatal stingray envenomation. Med J Aust.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008;33(5):670–1. 1989;151(11–12):621–5.
90. Wada T, et al. Sea urchin spine arthritis of the hand. 98. Trickett R, Whitaker IS, Boyce DE. Sting-ray injuries
J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(3):398–401. to the hand: case report, literature review and a sug-
91. De La Torre C, Toribio J. Sea-urchin granuloma: gested algorithm for management. J Plast Reconstr
histologic profile. A pathologic study of 50 biopsies. Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(8):e270–3.
J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28(5):223–8. 99. Clark RF, et al. Stingray envenomation: a retro-
92. Sjoberg T, de Weerd L. The usefulness of a skin spective review of clinical presentation and treat-
biopsy punch to remove sea urchin spines. ANZ J ment in 119 cases. J Emerg Med. 2007;33(1):
Surg. 2010;80(5):383. 33–7.
Index
A differential diagnosis, 69
Abrahams, I., 134 epidemiology, 61–62
Abuse etiologies, 64
bites, 252 blood products, 66–67
burns, 249–251 food, 65–66
clinical oral manifestations, 252 hymenoptera stings, 68
contusions, 248–249 idiopathic reactions, 68
cutaneous signs, 247–248 latex, 67–68
definition of, 247 medications, 66–67
demographics, 248 physical stimuli, 68–69
ecchymoses, 248–249 viral infections, 69
follicular hyperkeratosis, 252 pathophysiology, 62–63
hypovitaminosis A, 252 risk factors, 64
mistaken for abuse, 252–255 treatment, 74–76
phrynoderma, 252 Angioedema
sexual abuse, 251 clinical features, 63–64
violent hair pulling, 252 definitions, 61
workup, 248 diagnosis, 69–72
Acanthosis nigricans, 196, 203–204 differential diagnosis, 69
Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE), epidemiology, 61–62
209–210 etiologies, 64
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis blood products, 66–67
(AGEP) food, 65–66
antibiotics, 50 hymenoptera stings, 68
clinical presentation, 50 idiopathic reactions, 68
HIV-positive patient, 95 latex, 67–68
Adult-onset Still disease (AOSD) medications, 66–67
emergent complications, 226 physical stimuli, 68–69
etiology, 226 viral infections, 69
laboratory findings, 226–227 pathophysiology, 62–63
treatment, 227 risk factors, 64
Ahmed, A.R., 151 treatment, 72–74
AIDS. See HIV-positive patient Anthrax, 24–25
Akhyani, M., 134 Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)
Alkali burns, 245 definition, 214–215
American trypanosomiasis, 36–37 emergent complications, 215
Amyloidosis, 202–203 incidence, 215
Anal fissures, 253 laboratory findings,
Anaphylaxis 215–216
clinical features, 63–64 treatment, 216
definitions, 61 Apidae bites, 271–272
diagnosis, 72 Arachnids bite, 274–277
D E
D’Angelis, C., 168 Ecchymoses, 248–249
Dehiscence, 265–266 Ecthyma gangrenosum, 28–29
Dermatitis herpetiformis, 201 Eczema herpeticum, 13–14
Dermatologic surgical complications Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, 265
botox emergencies, 267–268 Elapidae bite, 279–280
chemical peel emergencies, 268 Electrical burn injury, 244
dehiscence, 265–266 Engraftment syndrome (ES), 110
filler emergencies, 266–267 Eosinophilia, 11
golden rule, prevention, 259–260 Eosinophilic folliculitis (EF), 87
hemorrhage, 260–263 Epidermolysis bullosa
infection, 263–265 causative factor, 2
laser emergencies, 266 differential diagnosis, 2
necrosis, 265 dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, 3–4
procedural emergencies, 266–268 epidemiology, 2
Dermatomyositis (DM) epidermolysis bullosa simplex, 2
characteristics, 216–217 junctional epidermolysis bullosa, 3
diagnosis, 217 Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), 166–167
emergent complications, 217–218 Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS), 2, 159–160
laboratory findings, 218 Epinephrine, 74–75
treatment, 218 Erythema multiforme, 10
Dermatoses, 133–134 Erythroderma, 14
Diabetes, 195–196 clinical manifestations, 138–139
Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), 112 complications, 142
Dowling–Meara (DM) EBS, 2 cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, 136–137
Drug allergy, 66–67 dermatoses, 133–134
Drug eruptions drug hypersensitivity reactions, 135
acute generalized exanthematous epidemiology, 133
pustulosis, 50 etiology, 133–137
clinical features, 52 GVHD, 137
drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, histopathology, 139–141
47–50 internal malignancy, 137
eosinophilia, 11 malignancy, 135–136
erythema multiforme, 10 pathogenesis, 137–138
exanthematous reaction, 9 pityriasis rubra pilaris, 135
fixed drug eruption, 9–10 prognosis, 142
rashes, 11 psoriasis, 134–135
serum sickness, 51–52 sezary syndrome, 139
serum sickness-like reaction, 9 treatment, 141–142
Stevens–Johnson syndrome, 10–11, Evans syndrome, 216
43–47
toxic epidermal necrolysis, 10–11, 43–47
urticaria, 8–9 F
Drug hypersensitivity reactions, 135. Felty syndrome, 222
See also Histamine-mediated Filler emergencies, 266–267
cutaneous lesions Fire ants, 272–274
Drug hypersensitivity syndrome (DHS), Fisher, M., 37, 168
93–94 Fluid resuscitation, burn injury, 238–239
Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms Fogo selvagem (FS), 157–158
(DRESS), 11 Follicular hyperkeratosis, 252
anticonvulsants, 49 Food allergy, 65–66
clinical presentation of, 48 Formicidae bites, 272–274
diagnostic marker, 48 Fungal infections
Gell and Coombs classification, 48 histoplasmosis, 35–36
hypersensitivity syndrome, 48–49 HIV-positive patient
incidence, 47–48 candidiasis, 88–89
and liver, 49 cryptococcus, 89–90
steroid therapy, 49–50 mucormycosis, 35
systemic features, 49 neonatal, 8
Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB), 3–4, pediatric, 16
167–168 systemic candidiasis, 34
290 Index
L
Laser emergencies, 266 N
Latex allergy, 67–68 Necrobiosis lipoidica, 195, 196
Leishmaniasis, 37 Necrosis, 265
292 Index